Enter a player name to begin or load your saved progress.
The 2014 ATP Vegeta Croatia Open Umag – Doubles tournament was won by the defending champions from the previous year.
Answer: False
Explanation: The defending champions, Martin Kližan and David Marrero, chose not to participate in the 2014 tournament. The event was won by a different team, František Čermák and Lukáš Rosol.
František Čermák and Lukáš Rosol, representing the Czech Republic, were the champions of the 2014 ATP Vegeta Croatia Open Umag – Doubles tournament.
Answer: True
Explanation: The Czech team of František Čermák and Lukáš Rosol won the tournament, defeating Dušan Lajović and Franko Škugor in the final.
The final score of the 2014 ATP Vegeta Croatia Open Umag – Doubles championship match was 6–4, 7–6, with the second set tie-break ending 7–5 in favor of the champions.
Answer: True
Explanation: The final match concluded with a score of 6–4, 7–6, including a 7–5 tie-break victory in the second set for the champions, Čermák and Rosol.
The '2014 ATP Vegeta Croatia Open Umag – Doubles' specifically focused on the singles competition.
Answer: False
Explanation: The event title explicitly indicates that this component of the tournament was focused on the doubles competition, not singles.
Dušan Lajović and Franko Škugor were the runners-up in the 2014 ATP Vegeta Croatia Open Umag – Doubles final.
Answer: True
Explanation: Dušan Lajović and Franko Škugor reached the final but were defeated by František Čermák and Lukáš Rosol, thus finishing as the runners-up.
Which team emerged as the champions of the 2014 ATP Vegeta Croatia Open Umag – Doubles tournament?
Answer: František Čermák and Lukáš Rosol
Explanation: The fourth-seeded team of František Čermák and Lukáš Rosol from the Czech Republic won the tournament title.
What was the final score of the 2014 ATP Vegeta Croatia Open Umag – Doubles championship match?
Answer: 6–4, 7–6 (7–5)
Explanation: The championship match was decided in two sets, with the final score being 6–4, 7–6, including a 7–5 tie-break in the second set.
Who were the runners-up in the 2014 ATP Vegeta Croatia Open Umag – Doubles final?
Answer: Dušan Lajović and Franko Škugor
Explanation: The team of Dušan Lajović (Serbia) and Franko Škugor (Croatia) reached the final but were defeated, finishing as the tournament runners-up.
Who were the defending champions of the doubles event who chose not to participate in the 2014 tournament?
Answer: Martin Kližan and David Marrero
Explanation: The previous year's champions were Martin Kližan and David Marrero, but they elected not to defend their title in the 2014 tournament.
Julian Knowle and Oliver Marach, the first-seeded team, were eliminated in the first round of the 2014 ATP Vegeta Croatia Open Umag – Doubles tournament.
Answer: False
Explanation: The first-seeded team of Julian Knowle and Oliver Marach performed well, reaching the semifinals before being eliminated.
The third-seeded team, Mate Pavić and André Sá, were the only seeded team to be eliminated in the first round of the tournament.
Answer: True
Explanation: Mate Pavić and André Sá, the third seeds, were defeated in their opening match, making them the only seeded pair to exit the tournament in the first round.
The second-seeded team, Pablo Cuevas and Horacio Zeballos, reached the final of the tournament.
Answer: False
Explanation: The second-seeded team of Cuevas and Zeballos was eliminated in the semifinals by the unseeded pair of Lajović and Škugor.
Which seeded team was eliminated in the first round of the 2014 ATP Vegeta Croatia Open Umag – Doubles tournament?
Answer: Third seeded team: Mate Pavić and André Sá
Explanation: The third-seeded team of Mate Pavić and André Sá was the only seeded pair to be defeated in their opening match of the tournament.
What was the performance outcome for the fourth-seeded team, František Čermák and Lukáš Rosol, in the tournament?
Answer: Were the champions
Explanation: The fourth-seeded team of František Čermák and Lukáš Rosol played through the entire tournament to emerge as the champions.
What was the performance outcome for the second-seeded team, Pablo Cuevas and Horacio Zeballos, in the tournament?
Answer: Reached the semifinals
Explanation: The second-seeded team of Pablo Cuevas and Horacio Zeballos advanced to the semifinals, where they were defeated by the eventual runners-up.
In the first round, the first-seeded team of Julian Knowle and Oliver Marach defeated Aljaž Bedene and Jamie Delgado with a score of 6–4, 6–3.
Answer: True
Explanation: The top-seeded pair of Knowle and Marach successfully advanced from the first round with a straight-sets victory over Bedene and Delgado.
Marco Cecchinato and Fabio Fognini were defeated by Gero Kretschmer and Alexander Satschko in the first round.
Answer: False
Explanation: The Italian pair of Marco Cecchinato and Fabio Fognini were victorious in their first-round match, defeating Kretschmer and Satschko 7–5, 6–1.
The eventual champions, František Čermák and Lukáš Rosol, won their first-round match against Paul Hanley and Jonathan Marray in three sets.
Answer: False
Explanation: Čermák and Rosol won their first-round match in straight sets, with a score of 7–6 (7–4), 6–1.
Wild card entrants Toni Androić and Marin Čilić advanced to the quarterfinals after winning their first-round match.
Answer: False
Explanation: The wild card team of Androić and Čilić was defeated in the first round by Guillermo Durán and Teymuraz Gabashvili in a three-set match.
Lukáš Dlouhý and Jiří Veselý defeated the third-seeded team of Mate Pavić and André Sá in the first round.
Answer: True
Explanation: Dlouhý and Veselý caused an upset in the first round by eliminating the third-seeded team of Pavić and Sá in a close three-set match.
In the quarterfinals, the first-seeded team of Julian Knowle and Oliver Marach defeated Marco Cecchinato and Fabio Fognini with a dominant score of 6–0, 6–3.
Answer: True
Explanation: The top-seeded pair of Knowle and Marach advanced to the semifinals with a convincing 6–0, 6–3 victory over Cecchinato and Fognini.
The fourth-seeded team, František Čermák and Lukáš Rosol, won their quarterfinal match against Pere Riba and João Sousa in straight sets.
Answer: False
Explanation: Čermák and Rosol won their quarterfinal match, but it was a three-set contest with a final score of 3–6, 6–3, [10–6].
Dušan Lajović and Franko Škugor defeated Guillermo Durán and Teymuraz Gabashvili in the quarterfinals.
Answer: True
Explanation: Lajović and Škugor advanced to the semifinals after winning their quarterfinal match against Durán and Gabashvili in three sets.
The second-seeded team, Pablo Cuevas and Horacio Zeballos, were defeated in the quarterfinals by Lukáš Dlouhý and Jiří Veselý.
Answer: False
Explanation: The second-seeded team of Cuevas and Zeballos won their quarterfinal match against Dlouhý and Veselý in a very close three-set contest.
In the semifinals, the fourth-seeded team of František Čermák and Lukáš Rosol defeated the first-seeded team of Julian Knowle and Oliver Marach.
Answer: True
Explanation: The eventual champions, Čermák and Rosol (fourth seed), advanced to the final by defeating the top-seeded team of Knowle and Marach in a three-set semifinal.
Dušan Lajović and Franko Škugor lost their semifinal match against the second-seeded team, Pablo Cuevas and Horacio Zeballos.
Answer: False
Explanation: In an upset, Dušan Lajović and Franko Škugor defeated the second-seeded team of Cuevas and Zeballos in a three-set semifinal to advance to the final.
What was the outcome of the first-round match between the first seeds, Julian Knowle and Oliver Marach, and the team of Aljaž Bedene and Jamie Delgado?
Answer: Knowle/Marach won 6–4, 6–3
Explanation: The top-seeded team of Julian Knowle and Oliver Marach secured a comfortable straight-sets victory in their opening match.
What was the result of the quarterfinal match between the first seeds, Julian Knowle/Oliver Marach, and Marco Cecchinato/Fabio Fognini?
Answer: Knowle/Marach won 6–0, 6–3
Explanation: The first-seeded team of Knowle and Marach advanced to the semifinals with a dominant 6–0, 6–3 victory over the Italian pair.
Which team did Dušan Lajović and Franko Škugor defeat in the quarterfinals?
Answer: Guillermo Durán and Teymuraz Gabashvili
Explanation: Dušan Lajović and Franko Škugor won their quarterfinal match against Guillermo Durán and Teymuraz Gabashvili in three sets to advance to the semifinals.
What was the outcome of the semifinal match between the first seeds, Julian Knowle/Oliver Marach, and the fourth seeds, František Čermák/Lukáš Rosol?
Answer: Čermák/Rosol won 6–4, 3–6, [10–3]
Explanation: The fourth-seeded team of Čermák and Rosol defeated the top-seeded team of Knowle and Marach in a three-set semifinal to advance to the championship match.
What was the result of the first-round match between Dušan Lajović/Franko Škugor and Paolo Lorenzi/Andreas Seppi?
Answer: Lajović/Škugor won 7–5, 6–2
Explanation: The eventual runners-up, Lajović and Škugor, began their tournament run with a straight-sets victory over the Italian pair of Lorenzi and Seppi.
Which team defeated the third-seeded team of Mate Pavić and André Sá in the first round?
Answer: Lukáš Dlouhý and Jiří Veselý
Explanation: The Czech team of Lukáš Dlouhý and Jiří Veselý were responsible for the first-round upset of the third-seeded team, Pavić and Sá.
What was the outcome of the quarterfinal match between the fourth seeds, František Čermák/Lukáš Rosol, and Pere Riba/João Sousa?
Answer: Čermák/Rosol won 3–6, 6–3, [10–6]
Explanation: The eventual champions, Čermák and Rosol, overcame a first-set loss to win their quarterfinal match in a deciding super tie-break.
Which team did Dušan Lajović and Franko Škugor defeat in the semifinals?
Answer: Pablo Cuevas and Horacio Zeballos
Explanation: Dušan Lajović and Franko Škugor pulled off an upset in the semifinals, defeating the second-seeded team of Pablo Cuevas and Horacio Zeballos to advance to the final.
What was the result of the first-round match involving the eventual champions, František Čermák/Lukáš Rosol, against Paul Hanley/Jonathan Marray?
Answer: Čermák/Rosol won 7–6 (7–4), 6–1
Explanation: The fourth-seeded team of Čermák and Rosol began their championship run with a straight-sets victory over Hanley and Marray in the first round.
In a tennis draw, 'Q' signifies a player who has withdrawn from the tournament due to injury.
Answer: False
Explanation: 'Q' stands for 'Qualifier,' indicating a player who earned their spot in the main draw by winning a preliminary qualifying tournament.
A 'Wild card' entry (WC) allows a player or team direct entry into a tournament without meeting usual ranking or qualification criteria.
Answer: True
Explanation: A 'Wild card' (WC) is an invitation extended by tournament organizers to a player or team, granting them direct entry regardless of their ranking.
The term 'Lucky loser' (LL) in a tennis draw key refers to a player who won the qualifying tournament but was then randomly drawn into the main draw.
Answer: False
Explanation: A 'Lucky loser' (LL) is a player who lost in the final round of qualifying but still gains entry into the main draw when another player withdraws.
An 'Alternate' (Alt) in a tennis draw is a player who is next in line to enter the main draw if a spot becomes available.
Answer: True
Explanation: An 'Alternate' (Alt) is a player or team on standby, ready to enter the main draw if another participant withdraws before the tournament begins.
'ITF' in a tennis draw key denotes a player who gained entry based on their ranking or performance in events sanctioned by the International Tennis Federation.
Answer: True
Explanation: 'ITF entry' signifies that a player's entry into the tournament is based on their ranking or results in events on the International Tennis Federation circuit.
A 'Protected ranking' (PR) is a special ranking given to a player who has been absent due to injury, allowing them to enter a limited number of tournaments using their pre-injury ranking.
Answer: True
Explanation: A 'Protected ranking' (PR) or 'Special ranking' (SR) allows players returning from long-term injury to use their former ranking to gain entry into tournaments for a limited time.
'SE' in a tennis draw stands for 'Senior exempt', granted to older players with a long career history.
Answer: False
Explanation: 'SE' stands for 'Special exempt,' which is granted to a player who cannot compete in a qualifying tournament because they are still playing in another tournament.
The term 'w/o' in a tennis match result indicates that a player retired from the match due to injury.
Answer: False
Explanation: 'w/o' signifies a 'Walkover,' which occurs when a player's opponent is unable to start the match. A mid-match withdrawal is denoted by 'r' for 'Retired'.
A 'd' in a tennis match result signifies that a player was disqualified from the match due to a violation of rules or conduct.
Answer: True
Explanation: The notation 'd' indicates that a player or team 'Defaulted' the match, meaning they were disqualified for a code of conduct violation or other rule infringement.
'JR' in a tennis draw key indicates a player who gained entry through a program designed to help accelerate promising junior players into the professional tennis circuit.
Answer: True
Explanation: 'JR' stands for 'Junior Accelerator Programme entrant,' signifying a player's entry via a developmental pathway for high-ranking junior players.
What does 'WC' indicate in a tennis tournament draw?
Answer: Wild card
Explanation: 'WC' stands for 'Wild card,' a direct entry into the tournament granted by organizers to a player or team who did not qualify through ranking.
Which of the following terms signifies a player who lost in the final round of a qualifying tournament but gains entry into the main draw due to a withdrawal?
Answer: Lucky loser (LL)
Explanation: A 'Lucky loser' (LL) is a player who, despite losing in the final qualifying round, gets a spot in the main draw when another player withdraws.
What does 'PR' signify in a tennis draw?
Answer: Protected ranking
Explanation: 'PR' stands for 'Protected ranking' (or SR for 'Special ranking'), which allows a player returning from a long-term injury to use their pre-injury ranking for tournament entry.
What does 'r' indicate in a tennis match result?
Answer: Retired
Explanation: The notation 'r' indicates that a player 'Retired' from the match, meaning they withdrew during play, typically due to injury or illness.
What does 'ITF' denote in a tennis draw key?
Answer: International Tennis Federation entry
Explanation: 'ITF' signifies that a player gained entry into the tournament based on their ranking or performance in events sanctioned by the International Tennis Federation.
What does 'd' signify in a tennis match result?
Answer: Defaulted
Explanation: The notation 'd' indicates that a player or team 'Defaulted' the match, which is a disqualification due to a violation of rules or conduct.
What does 'CO' stand for in a tennis draw key?
Answer: College Accelerator Programme entrant
Explanation: 'CO' indicates a player who gained entry into the tournament through a program designed to help accelerate college tennis players into the professional circuit.
What does 'NG' mean in a tennis draw key?
Answer: Next Gen Accelerator Program entrant
Explanation: 'NG' indicates a player who gained entry through a program associated with the Next Gen ATP Finals, which is designed for younger, rising players on the ATP Tour.
What does 'w/o' denote in a tennis match result?
Answer: Walkover
Explanation: 'w/o' stands for 'Walkover,' which is a victory awarded to a player or team when their opponent is unable to compete in the match at all.
The 2014 ATP World Tour navigation template lists only Grand Slam and Masters 1000 events.
Answer: False
Explanation: The 2014 ATP World Tour comprised multiple tiers, including Grand Slams, Masters 1000, 500 series, 250 series, team events, and the year-end ATP World Tour Finals.
Wimbledon was one of the Grand Slam events part of the 2014 ATP World Tour, featuring singles, doubles, and mixed doubles competitions.
Answer: True
Explanation: The four Grand Slam events in 2014 were the Australian Open, French Open, Wimbledon, and US Open, all of which included singles, doubles, and mixed doubles.
The ATP World Tour Masters 1000 events in 2014 included only singles competitions.
Answer: False
Explanation: All ATP World Tour Masters 1000 events in 2014, such as Indian Wells, Miami, and Madrid, featured both singles and doubles competitions.
The ATP World Tour 500 series tournaments listed for 2014 included Rotterdam, Rio, and Dubai.
Answer: True
Explanation: The 2014 ATP World Tour 500 series featured several tournaments, including those held in Rotterdam, Rio de Janeiro, and Dubai.
The Davis Cup was the only team event listed as part of the 2014 ATP World Tour.
Answer: True
Explanation: According to the provided navigation, the Davis Cup was the primary team event listed for the 2014 ATP World Tour season.
The ATP World Tour Finals, the culminating event of the 2014 ATP World Tour, was held in Paris.
Answer: False
Explanation: The 2014 ATP World Tour Finals, the season-ending championship, was held in London.
Which of the following Grand Slam events was NOT part of the 2014 ATP World Tour, according to the provided navigation?
Answer: Italian Open
Explanation: The four Grand Slam events are the Australian Open, French Open, Wimbledon, and US Open. The Italian Open is a prestigious ATP Masters 1000 event, but not a Grand Slam.
Which of these cities hosted an ATP World Tour Masters 1000 event in the 2014 season?
Answer: Miami
Explanation: Miami was one of the nine host cities for the ATP World Tour Masters 1000 series in 2014. Rotterdam and Barcelona hosted 500 series events, while London hosted the ATP Finals.
What was the culminating event of the 2014 ATP World Tour?
Answer: ATP World Tour Finals
Explanation: The ATP World Tour Finals, held in London, is the season-ending championship that serves as the culmination of the ATP Tour season.
Which ATP World Tour 500 series tournament was listed for the 2014 season?
Answer: Hamburg
Explanation: Hamburg was one of the eleven tournaments that constituted the ATP World Tour 500 series in 2014. Indian Wells and Monte Carlo are Masters 1000 events, while Kitzbühel is a 250 series event.
Which of the following ATP World Tour 250 series tournaments was listed for the 2014 season?
Answer: Umag
Explanation: Umag, the location of the tournament in this kit, was one of the many events in the ATP World Tour 250 series for 2014. Beijing and Dubai were 500 series events, and Toronto was a Masters 1000 event.