Enter a player name to begin or load your saved progress.
The article 'Cavite's at-large congressional district' primarily details the historical evolution of Cavite's representation in national legislatures, rather than its current system.
Answer: True
Explanation: The source material indicates that the article focuses on the historical representation of Cavite in various national legislatures where representatives were elected province-wide, contrasting this with the later creation of distinct congressional districts.
The term 'at-large' in legislative representation signifies election to serve an entire province or region, rather than a specific, smaller geographical subdivision.
Answer: True
Explanation: As defined in the source, 'at-large' representation means a legislator is elected to serve an entire province or region, not a specific subdivision within it.
Cavite elected representatives at-large for the Malolos Congress, the Philippine Commonwealth, and the Regular Batasang Pambansa.
Answer: True
Explanation: Cavite's history of at-large representation includes the Malolos Congress (First Philippine Republic), the Philippine Commonwealth, and the Regular Batasang Pambansa, as documented in the provided information.
Four representatives were elected at-large for Cavite to the Malolos Congress.
Answer: True
Explanation: The Malolos Congress, the national assembly of the First Philippine Republic, saw Cavite elect four representatives on an at-large basis.
Severino de las Alas, José Basa, Hugo Ilagan, and José Salamanca were the representatives elected at-large for Cavite to the Malolos Congress.
Answer: True
Explanation: The four individuals elected as at-large representatives for Cavite to the Malolos Congress were Severino de las Alas, José Basa, Hugo Ilagan, and José Salamanca.
The four representatives elected to the Malolos Congress from Cavite were affiliated with the Independent party, not the Nacionalista Party.
Answer: True
Explanation: Contrary to the assertion, the four representatives elected at-large for Cavite to the Malolos Congress were affiliated with the Independent party.
Cavite elected multiple representatives at-large for the Malolos Congress and the Second Philippine Republic, but not for the 7th Philippine Congress.
Answer: True
Explanation: While Cavite did elect multiple representatives at-large for the Malolos Congress and the Second Philippine Republic, the provided information does not indicate multiple at-large representatives for the 7th Philippine Congress.
What does the term 'at-large' signify in the context of legislative representation?
Answer: Representation elected to serve an entire province or region, rather than a specific subdivision.
Explanation: In legislative contexts, 'at-large' signifies representation elected to serve an entire province or region, rather than a specific subdivision within it.
Which legislative body convened from 1898 to 1901, for which Cavite elected four representatives at-large?
Answer: The Malolos Congress
Explanation: The Malolos Congress, convened from 1898 to 1901, was the legislative body for which Cavite elected four representatives at-large.
Who were among the four Independent party representatives elected at-large for Cavite to the Malolos Congress?
Answer: Severino de las Alas and Hugo Ilagan
Explanation: Severino de las Alas and Hugo Ilagan were among the four Independent party representatives elected at-large for Cavite to the Malolos Congress.
Which of the following legislative bodies did NOT have representatives elected at-large from Cavite, according to the article?
Answer: Senate of the Philippines
Explanation: According to the article, the Senate of the Philippines did not have representatives elected at-large from Cavite, unlike the Malolos Congress and the Philippine Assembly.
Cavite's at-large congressional district did not cease to exist in 1907; rather, it was re-established for the Philippine Assembly in that year.
Answer: True
Explanation: The source indicates that Cavite's at-large district was re-established in 1907 for the Philippine Assembly, rather than ceasing to exist.
Rafael Palma was not the first representative elected at-large for Cavite to the Malolos Congress; he was the first for the Philippine Assembly.
Answer: True
Explanation: Rafael Palma served as the first at-large representative for Cavite to the Philippine Assembly, not the Malolos Congress.
Rafael Palma represented the Nacionalista Party during his term in the Philippine Assembly.
Answer: True
Explanation: During his tenure as the at-large representative for Cavite in the Philippine Assembly, Rafael Palma was affiliated with the Nacionalista Party.
Emiliano Tria Tirona was initially elected to the Philippine Assembly to fill a vacancy caused by Rafael Palma's resignation.
Answer: True
Explanation: Emiliano Tria Tirona's entry into the Philippine Assembly as Cavite's at-large representative occurred via a special election in 1909, necessitated by Rafael Palma's resignation.
Emiliano Tria Tirona was affiliated with the Nacionalista Party during his service in the Philippine Assembly, not the Demócrata Party.
Answer: True
Explanation: Sources indicate that Emiliano Tria Tirona was affiliated with the Nacionalista Party during his service in the Philippine Assembly, contradicting the notion of continuous affiliation with the Demócrata Party during that period.
Florentino Joya represented Cavite's at-large district in the 3rd Philippine Legislature, belonging to the Nacionalista Party.
Answer: True
Explanation: Florentino Joya served as the at-large representative for Cavite in the 3rd Philippine Legislature and was a member of the Nacionalista Party.
Cavite's representation did not shift entirely to single-member districts with the 4th Philippine Legislature in 1916; the article suggests a transition period or specific circumstances involving at-large representation continuing.
Answer: True
Explanation: The transition to single-member districts was not absolute in 1916 with the commencement of the 4th Philippine Legislature, as the article notes Emiliano Tría Tirona was elected for the at-large district in that year.
Emiliano Tría Tirona belonged to the Demócrata Party when he represented Cavite's at-large district in the 4th Philippine Legislature.
Answer: True
Explanation: During his representation of Cavite's at-large district in the 4th Philippine Legislature, Emiliano Tría Tirona was a member of the Demócrata Party.
Emilio P. Virata succeeded Emiliano Tria Tirona, not Emiliano P. Virata, as the at-large representative for Cavite in the 5th Philippine Legislature.
Answer: True
Explanation: Emilio P. Virata took over the role of at-large representative for Cavite in the 5th Philippine Legislature, succeeding Emiliano Tria Tirona.
Pedro F. Espiritu, a member of the Demócrata Party, represented Cavite's at-large district in the 6th Philippine Legislature.
Answer: True
Explanation: Pedro F. Espiritu represented Cavite's at-large district in the 6th Philippine Legislature, and he was affiliated with the Demócrata Party.
Antero Soriano was elected to fill a vacancy in the 7th Philippine Legislature, but it was caused by the death of Augusto A. Reyes, not Emiliano Tria Tirona.
Answer: True
Explanation: Antero Soriano's election to the 7th Philippine Legislature filled a vacancy created by the death of Augusto A. Reyes, not Emiliano Tria Tirona.
Fidel Ibáñez represented Cavite's at-large district in the 8th Philippine Legislature, belonging to the Nacionalista Party Consolidado.
Answer: True
Explanation: Fidel Ibáñez served as the at-large representative for Cavite in the 8th Philippine Legislature, affiliated with the Nacionalista Party Consolidado.
Francisco Arca represented Cavite's at-large district in the 10th Philippine Legislature, but he was a member of the Nacionalista Party Democrático, not the Demócrata Party.
Answer: True
Explanation: Francisco Arca's affiliation during his representation of Cavite's at-large district in the 10th Philippine Legislature was with the Nacionalista Party Democrático, not the Demócrata Party.
When was Cavite's at-large district re-established for the Philippine Assembly?
Answer: 1907
Explanation: Cavite's at-large district was re-established for the Philippine Assembly on January 9, 1907.
Rafael Palma, the first at-large representative for Cavite to the Philippine Assembly, resigned due to what?
Answer: Appointment as a Philippine commissioner
Explanation: Rafael Palma resigned from his position as the first at-large representative for Cavite to the Philippine Assembly upon his appointment as a Philippine commissioner.
Which party did Emiliano Tria Tirona primarily represent during his terms in the Philippine Assembly?
Answer: Nacionalista Party
Explanation: Emiliano Tria Tirona primarily represented the Nacionalista Party during his terms in the Philippine Assembly.
Who represented Cavite's at-large district in the 3rd Philippine Legislature (1912-1916)?
Answer: Florentino Joya
Explanation: Florentino Joya represented Cavite's at-large district in the 3rd Philippine Legislature, serving from 1912 to 1916.
In which legislative body did Emiliano Tría Tirona represent Cavite as a member of the Demócrata Party?
Answer: 4th Philippine Legislature
Explanation: Emiliano Tría Tirona represented Cavite as a member of the Demócrata Party during the 4th Philippine Legislature.
Who succeeded Emiliano Tría Tirona as the at-large representative for Cavite in the 5th Philippine Legislature?
Answer: Emilio P. Virata
Explanation: Emilio P. Virata succeeded Emiliano Tria Tirona as the at-large representative for Cavite in the 5th Philippine Legislature.
What party affiliation did Pedro F. Espiritu have during his representation in the 6th Philippine Legislature?
Answer: Demócrata Party
Explanation: Pedro F. Espiritu was affiliated with the Demócrata Party during his representation of Cavite's at-large district in the 6th Philippine Legislature.
Antero Soriano was elected to the 7th Philippine Legislature to fill a vacancy caused by the death of which representative?
Answer: Augusto A. Reyes
Explanation: Antero Soriano was elected to the 7th Philippine Legislature to fill a vacancy caused by the death of Augusto A. Reyes.
Fidel Ibáñez represented Cavite's at-large district in the 8th Philippine Legislature and was a member of which party?
Answer: Nacionalista Party Consolidado
Explanation: Fidel Ibáñez represented Cavite's at-large district in the 8th Philippine Legislature as a member of the Nacionalista Party Consolidado.
Which representative served Cavite's at-large district in the 9th Philippine Legislature (1931-1934) as a member of the Demócrata Party?
Answer: Emiliano Tria Tirona
Explanation: Emiliano Tria Tirona served Cavite's at-large district in the 9th Philippine Legislature (1931-1934) as a member of the Demócrata Party.
Francisco Arca represented Cavite's at-large district in the 10th Philippine Legislature until its dissolution on what date?
Answer: September 16, 1935
Explanation: Francisco Arca represented Cavite's at-large district in the 10th Philippine Legislature until its dissolution on September 16, 1935.
Justiniano Montano was the first representative elected at-large for Cavite to the National Assembly of the Commonwealth.
Answer: True
Explanation: Justiniano Montano holds the distinction of being the first representative elected at-large for Cavite to the National Assembly of the Commonwealth of the Philippines.
Justiniano Montano's 1938 election to the 2nd National Assembly was annulled, and Manuel S. Rojas was declared the winner.
Answer: True
Explanation: The 1938 election for Cavite's at-large district in the 2nd National Assembly resulted in Justiniano Montano's election being annulled, with Manuel S. Rojas subsequently declared the victor.
During the Second Philippine Republic, Cavite sent two representatives at-large, Demetrio B. Encarnación and Luis Y. Ferrer, both affiliated with the KALIBAPI party, not the Nacionalista Party.
Answer: True
Explanation: The Second Philippine Republic saw Cavite represented by two at-large delegates, Demetrio B. Encarnación and Luis Y. Ferrer, who were members of the KALIBAPI party.
Justiniano Montano represented Cavite's at-large district in the House of Representatives of the Commonwealth after its re-creation in 1945.
Answer: True
Explanation: Following the re-creation of Cavite's at-large district in the House of Representatives of the Commonwealth in 1945, Justiniano Montano served as its representative.
When was Cavite's at-large district established for the National Assembly of the Commonwealth of the Philippines?
Answer: 1935
Explanation: Cavite's at-large district was established for the National Assembly of the Commonwealth of the Philippines on September 16, 1935.
Justiniano Montano was first elected at-large for Cavite to the Commonwealth's National Assembly in 1935, representing which party?
Answer: Nacionalista Party Democrático
Explanation: Justiniano Montano was first elected at-large for Cavite to the Commonwealth's National Assembly in 1935, representing the Nacionalista Party Democrático.
Manuel S. Rojas was declared the winner of the 1938 elections for Cavite's at-large district after an electoral protest against whom?
Answer: Justiniano Montano
Explanation: Manuel S. Rojas was declared the winner of the 1938 elections for Cavite's at-large district following an electoral protest lodged against Justiniano Montano.
During the Second Philippine Republic (1943-1944), Cavite sent two representatives at-large. What party were they affiliated with?
Answer: KALIBAPI
Explanation: During the Second Philippine Republic (1943-1944), the two representatives elected at-large for Cavite were affiliated with the KALIBAPI party.
Manuel S. Rojas represented Cavite's at-large district in the 2nd Congress of the Philippines as a member of the Liberal Party, not the Nacionalista Party.
Answer: True
Explanation: Manuel S. Rojas, during his tenure representing Cavite's at-large district in the 2nd Congress of the Philippines, was affiliated with the Liberal Party.
José T. Cajulis represented Cavite's at-large district in the 3rd Congress of the Philippines as a member of the Nacionalista Party.
Answer: True
Explanation: José T. Cajulis served as the at-large representative for Cavite in the 3rd Congress of the Philippines, belonging to the Nacionalista Party.
Justiniano Montano served in the 4th, 5th, and 6th Congresses, representing the Nacionalista Party, not the Liberal Party.
Answer: True
Explanation: Justiniano Montano's service in the 4th, 5th, and 6th Congresses was as a representative of the Nacionalista Party, not the Liberal Party.
Justiniano Montano's term in the 7th Congress was cut short by the imposition of martial law.
Answer: True
Explanation: The term of Justiniano Montano in the 7th Congress was indeed curtailed due to the imposition of martial law.
The dissolution of Cavite's at-large district led to its replacement by the twenty-seat Southern Tagalog (Region IV-A)'s at-large district for the Interim Batasang Pambansa.
Answer: True
Explanation: The dissolution of Cavite's at-large district led to its replacement by the twenty-seat Southern Tagalog (Region IV-A)'s at-large district for the Interim Batasang Pambansa.
Helena Benitez, Renato P. Dragon, and Cesar Virata were elected at-large for Cavite to the Regular Batasang Pambansa, but they belonged to the Kilusang Bagong Lipunan (KBL) party, not the Nacionalista Party.
Answer: True
Explanation: The representatives elected at-large for Cavite to the Regular Batasang Pambansa—Helena Benitez, Renato P. Dragon, and Cesar Virata—were members of the Kilusang Bagong Lipunan (KBL) party.
Which representative served Cavite's at-large district in the 1st Congress of the Philippines (1946-1949)?
Answer: Justiniano Montano
Explanation: Justiniano Montano served as the representative for Cavite's at-large district in the 1st Congress of the Philippines (1946-1949).
Manuel S. Rojas represented Cavite's at-large district in the 2nd Congress of the Philippines (1949-1953) as a member of which party?
Answer: Liberal Party
Explanation: Manuel S. Rojas represented Cavite's at-large district in the 2nd Congress of the Philippines (1949-1953) as a member of the Liberal Party.
Who represented Cavite's at-large district in the 3rd Congress of the Philippines (1953-1957)?
Answer: José T. Cajulis
Explanation: José T. Cajulis represented Cavite's at-large district in the 3rd Congress of the Philippines (1953-1957).
Justiniano Montano was re-elected for the 7th Congress in 1969, representing which party?
Answer: Liberal Party
Explanation: Justiniano Montano was re-elected for the 7th Congress in 1969, representing the Liberal Party.
Cavite's at-large district was dissolved after the 7th Congress and replaced by representation for which region in the Interim Batasang Pambansa?
Answer: Southern Tagalog (Region IV-A)
Explanation: Following the dissolution of Cavite's at-large district after the 7th Congress, representation for the Interim Batasang Pambansa was established for the Southern Tagalog (Region IV-A) region.
Who were the three representatives elected at-large for Cavite to the Regular Batasang Pambansa (1984-1986), all members of the KBL party?
Answer: Helena Benitez, Renato P. Dragon, Cesar Virata
Explanation: Helena Benitez, Renato P. Dragon, and Cesar Virata were the three representatives elected at-large for Cavite to the Regular Batasang Pambansa (1984-1986), all members of the KBL party.
After the dissolution of the Regular Batasang Pambansa, Cavite's representation was divided into distinct congressional districts.
Answer: True
Explanation: Following the dissolution of the Regular Batasang Pambansa, Cavite's legislative representation transitioned to distinct congressional districts.
When did Cavite's at-large congressional district officially cease to exist with the creation of distinct districts?
Answer: 1987
Explanation: Cavite's at-large congressional district officially ceased to exist with the creation of distinct districts on February 2, 1987.