Enter a player name to begin or load your saved progress.
The East German doping program was primarily designed to improve the health and well-being of its athletes.
Answer: False
Explanation: The primary objective of the East German doping program was to enhance the country's state image and prestige through international sporting success, not to improve athlete health.
The East German doping program, which began in the 1960s, was characterized by its formalized, secret, and pervasive nature.
Answer: True
Explanation: The East German doping program, commencing in the 1960s, was indeed highly formalized, secretive, and pervasive in its operations, leading to widespread abuse.
Performance-enhancing drugs became available for both male and female athletes in East Germany in the same year, 1966.
Answer: False
Explanation: Performance-enhancing drugs became available for male athletes in 1966 and for female athletes in 1968, not the same year.
Doping became a blanket policy imposed by the GDR sports federation starting in 1974.
Answer: True
Explanation: The administration of performance-enhancing drugs was formalized into a blanket policy by the GDR sports federation beginning in 1974.
After the building of the Berlin Wall, the East German government prioritized high-level sports to gain international recognition and legitimacy.
Answer: True
Explanation: High-level sports were strategically used by the East German government to project an image of national strength and achieve international recognition after the Berlin Wall's construction.
The 'Leistungssportbeschluss' directive of 1969 aimed to equally distribute resources across all athletic disciplines in East Germany.
Answer: False
Explanation: The 'Leistungssportbeschluss' divided disciplines into 'Sport 1' (Olympic potential, state support) and 'Sport 2' (less interest, fewer resources), not equal distribution.
East Germany identified talented athletes primarily through voluntary participation in local sports clubs without government intervention.
Answer: False
Explanation: Talented athletes were systematically identified by government scouts in youth sport centers, followed by intensive Olympic training, indicating significant state intervention.
The Sportvereinigung Dynamo was specifically identified as a central hub for doping activities within East Germany.
Answer: True
Explanation: The Sportvereinigung Dynamo (Sport Club Dynamo) was indeed singled out as a central hub for doping activities within the East German athletic system.
The formalization of the doping system in the 1970s was a direct response to East Germany's poor performance in the 1972 Summer Olympics.
Answer: False
Explanation: The formalization of the doping system followed East Germany's remarkable third-place finish in the 1972 Summer Olympics, reinforcing the state's belief in its sports program.
According to Jean-Pierre de Mondenard, East German doping was unique because it was an official state policy, unlike doping in other countries.
Answer: True
Explanation: Jean-Pierre de Mondenard highlighted that the crucial difference in East Germany was that doping represented official state policy, making it a systematic and government-sanctioned program.
Johanna Sperling, a coach, sent a letter in 1963 warning her athletes against doping, indicating early awareness of its dangers.
Answer: True
Explanation: Coach Johanna Sperling's letter in 1963 demonstrates an early recognition of the health consequences of performance-enhancing drugs, predating the program's formalization.
Scholars generally view the East German regime's doping program as a testament to its commitment to athlete welfare.
Answer: False
Explanation: Scholars consistently characterize the regime as abusive and corrupt, prioritizing athletic success over the well-being of its citizens, due to the systematic nature and damaging side effects of the doping program.
When did the East German doping program officially begin?
Answer: 1960s
Explanation: The East German doping program commenced in the 1960s, characterized by its formalized, secret, and pervasive nature.
In what year did performance-enhancing drugs first become available for female athletes in East Germany?
Answer: 1968
Explanation: Performance-enhancing drugs were first made available for female athletes in East Germany in 1968, two years after their introduction for male athletes.
When did doping become a formalized blanket policy imposed by the GDR sports federation?
Answer: 1974
Explanation: Doping was institutionalized as a blanket policy by the GDR sports federation starting in 1974, making it a widespread state-mandated system.
Why did the East German government prioritize high-level sports after the construction of the Berlin Wall?
Answer: To gain international recognition and legitimacy for the state.
Explanation: High-level sports were prioritized as a strategic tool to gain international recognition and legitimacy for the East German state after the Berlin Wall's construction.
What was the primary objective of the 'Leistungssportbeschluss' (high-performance directive) of 1969?
Answer: To divide athletic disciplines into categories based on Olympic potential.
Explanation: The 'Leistungssportbeschluss' aimed to categorize athletic disciplines, prioritizing those with potential for Olympic glory for state support and development.
How did East Germany primarily identify talented athletes for its Olympic program?
Answer: By scouting children in youth sport centers across the country.
Explanation: Talented athletes were systematically identified by government scouts in youth sport centers, who then selected promising prospects for intensive Olympic training.
Which specific sports organization was identified as a central hub for doping activities in East Germany?
Answer: The Sportvereinigung Dynamo (Sport Club Dynamo)
Explanation: The Sportvereinigung Dynamo (Sport Club Dynamo) was specifically identified as a central hub for doping activities within East Germany's athletic system.
What event led to the formalization of the doping system in the 1970s?
Answer: East Germany's remarkable third-place finish in the 1972 Summer Olympics.
Explanation: The formalization of the doping system followed East Germany's impressive third-place finish in the 1972 Summer Olympics, which reinforced the state's commitment to the program.
According to Jean-Pierre de Mondenard, what was the crucial difference between doping in East Germany and other countries?
Answer: Doping in East Germany was an official state policy.
Explanation: Jean-Pierre de Mondenard emphasized that the defining characteristic of East German doping was its status as official state policy, making it a systematic and government-sanctioned program.
What action did coach Johanna Sperling take as early as 1963 regarding doping?
Answer: She sent a letter to her athletes warning them against doping.
Explanation: In 1963, coach Johanna Sperling issued an early warning to her athletes against doping, indicating an awareness of its dangers before the program's formalization.
How do scholars generally characterize the East German regime in light of the doping revelations?
Answer: As abusive and corrupt, prioritizing athletic success over citizen well-being.
Explanation: Scholars consistently characterize the East German regime as abusive and corrupt, having prioritized athletic success through doping over the fundamental well-being of its citizens.
Chlorodehydromethyltestosterone, known as Turinabol, was the initial performance-enhancing drug administered to East German athletes.
Answer: False
Explanation: Initially, East German athletes were administered testosterone esters; Chlorodehydromethyltestosterone (Turinabol) became the drug of choice later in the program.
East German athletes were fully informed about the performance-enhancing drugs they were taking and their potential side effects.
Answer: False
Explanation: Athletes were often deceived, sworn to secrecy, or simply not informed about the drugs, frequently being told they were merely 'vitamins'.
The Kreischa laboratory publicly reported numerous positive drug tests for East German athletes, leading to international sanctions.
Answer: False
Explanation: Despite internal positive results, the IOC-approved Kreischa laboratory virtually never reported an East German athlete failing an official drug test publicly, indicating concealment.
State-sponsored doping research in East Germany focused exclusively on male athletes due to their greater performance boost.
Answer: False
Explanation: Particular attention was paid to doping women and adolescent girls, as they showed the greatest performance boost from the substances.
The 'uM group' was created in 1974 with the primary goal of improving athlete nutrition and training methods.
Answer: False
Explanation: The 'uM group' was created in 1974 with the primary objectives of improving doping effects on athletes and developing techniques to evade detection.
Oral Turinabol was a key component in the East German doping program, produced by a state-owned pharmaceuticals firm.
Answer: True
Explanation: Oral Turinabol, an anabolic-androgenic steroid produced by the state-owned firm Jenapharm, was a predominant and widely used drug in the program.
State Research Plan 14.25 was a public initiative designed to promote healthy athletic development in East Germany.
Answer: False
Explanation: State Research Plan 14.25 was a highly centralized, clandestine program for systematic state doping, not a public health initiative.
The Ministry of State Security (Stasi) played a minor role in the doping program, primarily focused on general security.
Answer: False
Explanation: The Stasi was heavily involved in the doping program, primarily to ensure its secrecy and conceal the activities from international scrutiny.
After Ilona Slupianek tested positive in 1977, the GDR government immediately ceased all doping activities to avoid further international embarrassment.
Answer: False
Explanation: Following Ilona Slupianek's positive test, the GDR government took over the Kreischa testing laboratory and allowed her to continue training unchecked with anabolic steroids.
East Germany managed positive internal drug tests by publicly announcing athlete withdrawals due to doping violations.
Answer: False
Explanation: East Germany concealed positive internal drug tests by publicly citing 'injury' or 'fabricated medical condition' for athlete withdrawals, not doping violations.
Which performance-enhancing drug became the 'drug of choice' later in the East German doping program, commercially known as Turinabol?
Answer: Chlorodehydromethyltestosterone (CDMT)
Explanation: Chlorodehydromethyltestosterone (CDMT), commercially known as Turinabol, became the primary performance-enhancing drug administered to East German athletes later in the program.
How were East German athletes typically deceived about the drugs they were taking?
Answer: They were frequently told the pills were merely 'vitamins'.
Explanation: Athletes were often deceived by being told the pills they received were simply 'vitamins,' concealing the true nature of the performance-enhancing substances.
What was the primary function of the Kreischa laboratory within the East German doping system?
Answer: To conduct official IOC-approved drug tests while concealing positive results for East German athletes.
Explanation: The Kreischa laboratory, an IOC-approved facility, was used to test East German athletes, but positive results were systematically concealed to avoid public exposure.
What specific demographic group received particular attention in state-sponsored doping research due to showing the greatest performance boost?
Answer: Women and adolescent girls
Explanation: State-sponsored doping research specifically focused on women and adolescent girls, as they demonstrated the most significant performance enhancement from the administered substances.
What was the primary objective of the 'uM group' created in 1974?
Answer: To improve doping effects and evade detection.
Explanation: The 'uM group' was established in 1974 with the primary goals of enhancing doping effects on athletes and developing techniques to prevent detection.
What was the significance of Oral Turinabol in the East German doping program?
Answer: It was a predominant anabolic-androgenic steroid produced by a state-owned firm and widely used.
Explanation: Oral Turinabol, an anabolic-androgenic steroid produced by the state-owned firm Jenapharm, was a predominant and widely used drug, central to the systematic doping efforts.
What was State Research Plan 14.25?
Answer: A highly centralized, clandestine program for systematic state doping.
Explanation: State Research Plan 14.25 was a clandestine, highly centralized program established in 1974, integral to the systematic state doping efforts in East Germany.
What role did the Ministry of State Security (Stasi) play in the East German doping program?
Answer: They were heavily involved in ensuring the program's secrecy.
Explanation: The Stasi was deeply involved in the East German doping program, primarily to ensure its clandestine nature and prevent any public exposure of the activities.
What was the GDR government's response after shot-putter Ilona Slupianek tested positive for anabolic steroids in 1977?
Answer: They took over the Kreischa testing laboratory and allowed her to train unchecked.
Explanation: Following Ilona Slupianek's positive test, the GDR government assumed control of the Kreischa testing laboratory and permitted her to continue training with anabolic steroids without further checks.
How did East Germany typically handle athletes who tested positive in secret internal drug tests before international competitions?
Answer: They were removed from competition, with 'injury' or 'fabricated medical condition' cited publicly.
Explanation: Athletes who tested positive internally were withdrawn from competitions, with public explanations of 'injury' or 'fabricated medical condition' to conceal doping.
The health consequences for East German athletes involved in the doping program were generally minor and temporary.
Answer: False
Explanation: The doping program often had devastating and lasting physical and psychological effects on athletes, including virilization, cardiovascular issues, and liver problems.
Birgit Boese was informed by her coach about the true nature of the pills she was taking and encouraged to discuss them with her parents.
Answer: False
Explanation: Birgit Boese was explicitly instructed by her coach not to tell anyone, including her parents, about the pills she was given.
Rica Reinisch, an Olympic champion, suffered from recurring ovarian cysts and miscarriages, believed to be consequences of the doping program.
Answer: True
Explanation: Rica Reinisch, a triple Olympic champion, indeed suffered from numerous miscarriages and recurring ovarian cysts, which are attributed to the doping program.
Hans-Georg Aschenbach, a defecting ski-jumper, claimed that for every Olympic champion, there were at least 350 invalids due to the doping program.
Answer: True
Explanation: Hans-Georg Aschenbach indeed stated that 'for every Olympic champion, there are at least 350 invalids,' highlighting the severe human cost of the doping program.
Renate Neufeld's defection and revelations about doping had no significant repercussions for her family in East Germany.
Answer: False
Explanation: After Renate Neufeld's defection, her father lost his job and her sister was expelled from her handball club, demonstrating severe repercussions.
Andreas Krieger, formerly Heidi Krieger, underwent sex reassignment surgery, attributing the decision partly to the effects of systematic anabolic steroid doping.
Answer: True
Explanation: Andreas Krieger, systematically doped from age 16, attributed his decision to undergo sex reassignment surgery partly to the chemical changes exacerbated by anabolic steroid use.
The death of teenage swimmer Jörg Sievers was officially attributed to influenza, despite parental suspicions of anabolic steroid use.
Answer: True
Explanation: Jörg Sievers' death was officially attributed to influenza, but his parents suspected anabolic steroid use due to his enlarged heart, despite an inconclusive post-reunification investigation.
Which of the following was NOT a common health consequence for athletes involved in the East German doping program?
Answer: Enhanced immune system function
Explanation: Common health consequences included virilization, cardiovascular disease, liver problems, and mood swings; enhanced immune function was not a reported outcome.
What was Birgit Boese instructed to do regarding the pills she was given at age twelve?
Answer: Not to tell anyone, including her parents, about them.
Explanation: Birgit Boese was explicitly instructed by her coach to maintain secrecy about the pills, even from her parents, highlighting the deceptive practices.
What specific health issues did former East German swimmer Rica Reinisch suffer, believed to be consequences of doping?
Answer: Numerous miscarriages and recurring ovarian cysts.
Explanation: Rica Reinisch, an Olympic champion, suffered from numerous miscarriages and recurring ovarian cysts, which are attributed to the doping program.
What did defecting ski-jumper Hans-Georg Aschenbach claim about the human cost of the doping program?
Answer: That for every Olympic champion, there are at least 350 invalids.
Explanation: Hans-Georg Aschenbach asserted that the doping program created 'at least 350 invalids' for every Olympic champion, emphasizing its severe human cost.
What were the consequences for Renate Neufeld's family after she defected and spoke out about doping?
Answer: Her father lost his job and her sister was expelled from her handball club.
Explanation: Renate Neufeld's family faced severe retaliation, with her father losing his job and her sister being expelled from her sports club, after her defection and revelations.
What significant personal change did Andreas Krieger (formerly Heidi Krieger) undergo, which he attributed partly to doping?
Answer: He underwent sex reassignment surgery and changed his name.
Explanation: Andreas Krieger, systematically doped as Heidi Krieger, underwent sex reassignment surgery and changed his name, attributing this decision partly to the effects of anabolic steroid doping.
What was the official cause of death given for teenage swimmer Jörg Sievers in 1973, despite parental suspicions?
Answer: Influenza
Explanation: Despite parental suspicions of anabolic steroid use due to an enlarged heart, the official cause of death for Jörg Sievers was recorded as influenza.
The scale of the East German doping program was primarily revealed through international investigations rather than internal documents.
Answer: False
Explanation: The scale of the program was significantly revealed by the opening of East German government's secret records in 1993, alongside accounts from former athletes.
The ZERV was an international organization established to investigate doping crimes globally after the Cold War.
Answer: False
Explanation: The ZERV was a special division of the German criminal police, established to investigate doping crimes specifically committed under the East German regime.
Manfred Ewald and Manfred Höppner were convicted as accessories to 'intentional bodily harm of athletes, including minors,' for their roles in the doping program.
Answer: True
Explanation: Manfred Ewald, the Minister of Sport, and Manfred Höppner, the top sports doctor, were indeed convicted for their roles in the systematic doping of athletes, including minors.
The German government has provided financial compensation to former East German doping victims through specific legislative acts.
Answer: True
Explanation: The German government has provided financial assistance to victims, notably through the Second Doping Victims Assistance Act in 2016, establishing a fund for those with significant health damage.
Brigitte Berendonk and Werner Franke were proponents of doping who helped develop new performance-enhancing substances for East Germany.
Answer: False
Explanation: Brigitte Berendonk and Werner Franke were opponents of doping who published secret research documents, instrumental in exposing the state-run program.
Christian Schenk's request for doping victim compensation was universally accepted without debate, as he admitted to using drugs.
Answer: False
Explanation: Christian Schenk's case sparked debate on whether athletes who knowingly doped should be considered victims entitled to compensation, indicating it was not universally accepted.
The majority of athletes invited by the ZERV to testify about doping crimes did so, eager to share their experiences.
Answer: False
Explanation: Only about 300 of the approximately 1,000 invited athletes testified, suggesting various reasons for non-participation, including potential complicity or desire for privacy.
How was the systematic nature of the East German doping program primarily revealed after the fall of the Berlin Wall?
Answer: By the East German government's secret records, opened in 1993.
Explanation: The systematic nature of the program was primarily revealed through the opening of the East German government's secret records in 1993, corroborated by former athletes' accounts.
What was the ZERV (Zentrale Ermittlungsstelle für Regierungs- und Vereinigungskriminalität) responsible for after German reunification?
Answer: Investigating doping crimes committed under the East German regime.
Explanation: The ZERV was a special division of the German criminal police tasked with investigating doping crimes specifically committed under the East German regime after reunification.
Who was Manfred Ewald, and what was his primary role in the East German doping program?
Answer: The East German Minister of Sport who initiated and imposed the blanket doping system.
Explanation: Manfred Ewald was the East German Minister of Sport and head of the GDR sports federation, instrumental in initiating and imposing the systematic doping program.
What was the purpose of the Second Doping Victims Assistance Act passed by the German Bundestag in 2016?
Answer: To provide financial assistance to victims of doping in the former GDR with significant health damage.
Explanation: The Second Doping Victims Assistance Act established a fund to provide financial assistance to former GDR doping victims who suffered significant health damage.
Who were Brigitte Berendonk and Werner Franke, and what was their significant contribution to exposing East German doping?
Answer: Opponents of doping who published secret research documents documenting the state-run program.
Explanation: Brigitte Berendonk and Werner Franke were anti-doping advocates who published secret research documents, critically exposing the systematic nature of the state-run doping program.
What controversy surrounded Christian Schenk's consideration for doping victim compensation?
Answer: It sparked debate on whether athletes who knowingly doped should be considered victims.
Explanation: Christian Schenk's case for compensation, despite admitting to doping, initiated a debate on the eligibility of athletes who knowingly used performance-enhancing drugs for victim status.
Approximately how many athletes invited by the ZERV to testify about doping crimes actually did so?
Answer: Around 300
Explanation: Of the approximately 1,000 athletes invited by the ZERV to testify about doping crimes, only about 300 ultimately participated.
East Germany's Olympic medal rankings consistently placed them in the top ten, but never higher than fifth place.
Answer: False
Explanation: East Germany placed second overall in the Olympic medal counts in both the 1976 and 1980 Summer Olympics, demonstrating a higher ranking than fifth place.
The International Olympic Committee (IOC) decided to redistribute medals from events where East German athletes were later found to have doped.
Answer: False
Explanation: The IOC executive board announced it had no intention of revising the Olympic record books or redistributing medals, despite appeals.
In the 1980s, the IOC successfully halted East German doping through robust and effective doping controls.
Answer: False
Explanation: While the IOC reinforced doping controls in the 1980s, its investigations were severely hampered by a lack of adequate tools and expertise, failing to halt the program.
East Germany's Olympic medal count showed a steady decline from 1964 to 1976, indicating a failing sports program.
Answer: False
Explanation: East Germany's Olympic medal count showed a substantial increase from 1964 to 1976, doubling to 40 medals in 1976, indicating a highly successful, albeit illicit, sports program.
What was the primary motivation behind the East German government's state-sponsored doping program?
Answer: To enhance the country's state image and prestige through international sporting success.
Explanation: The primary motivation was to enhance East Germany's state image and prestige by achieving numerous medals in international sporting competitions, demonstrating perceived national superiority.
How did East Germany's Olympic medal ranking reflect the success of its doping program in the 1970s?
Answer: They placed second overall in both the 1976 and 1980 Summer Olympics.
Explanation: East Germany's doping program contributed to its high Olympic medal rankings, including placing second overall in the 1976 and 1980 Summer Olympics.
What was the International Olympic Committee's (IOC) stance on redistributing medals after the East German doping revelations?
Answer: They announced no intention of revising the Olympic record books.
Explanation: The IOC executive board explicitly stated it had no intention of revising the Olympic record books or redistributing medals, despite appeals.
How effective were the IOC's investigations into East German doping in the 1980s?
Answer: They were severely hampered by a lack of adequate tools and expertise.
Explanation: Despite reinforced doping controls, the IOC's investigations in the 1980s were significantly hampered by a lack of adequate tools and expertise, preventing full exposure of the program.
How did East Germany's Olympic medal count change from 1964 to 1976?
Answer: It showed a substantial increase, doubling to 40 medals in 1976.
Explanation: East Germany's Olympic medal count demonstrated a substantial increase from 1964 to 1976, doubling to 40 medals in the latter year.