Enter a player name to begin or load your saved progress.
Electronic warfare (EW) is solely focused on disrupting enemy radar systems.
Answer: False
Explanation: Electronic warfare (EW) encompasses a broader strategic objective of controlling the electromagnetic spectrum, which includes enabling friendly operations and disrupting adversaries, not solely focusing on radar disruption.
The primary objective of electronic warfare is to ensure friendly forces can use the electromagnetic spectrum without interference while denying this advantage to adversaries.
Answer: True
Explanation: This statement accurately reflects the dual objective of EW: enabling friendly use of the electromagnetic spectrum while simultaneously denying the same advantage to opponents.
Electronic warfare can only be conducted from the air domain.
Answer: False
Explanation: Electronic warfare operations are conducted across multiple domains, including air, sea, land, and space, utilizing both crewed and uncrewed systems.
The electromagnetic environment (EME) is considered a warfighting domain by NATO.
Answer: True
Explanation: NATO recognizes the electromagnetic environment (EME) as a warfighting domain, comparable to air, land, and sea, emphasizing its strategic significance in modern conflict.
What is the fundamental definition of Electronic Warfare (EW)?
Answer: The strategic use of the electromagnetic spectrum or directed energy to control it.
Explanation: Electronic warfare (EW) is defined as the strategic utilization of the electromagnetic spectrum or directed energy to achieve spectrum control, thereby enabling friendly operations while disrupting adversaries.
Which of the following is a primary objective of Electronic Warfare?
Answer: To ensure friendly forces can operate without interference in the electromagnetic spectrum while denying it to opponents.
Explanation: A primary objective of EW is to maintain friendly freedom of action within the electromagnetic spectrum while preventing adversaries from achieving the same advantage.
From which domains can electronic warfare operations be conducted?
Answer: Air, sea, land, and space, using crewed and uncrewed systems.
Explanation: Electronic warfare operations are versatile and can be executed across air, sea, land, and space domains, employing both manned and unmanned platforms.
What does the term 'electromagnetic environment (EME)' refer to in the context of military operations?
Answer: The portion of the information environment that utilizes the electromagnetic spectrum.
Explanation: The electromagnetic environment (EME) denotes the segment of the information environment that is predicated upon the utilization of the electromagnetic spectrum, critical for modern military operations.
Electronic attack (EA) is synonymous with electronic protection (EP).
Answer: False
Explanation: Electronic Attack (EA) and Electronic Protection (EP) are distinct subdivisions of EW; EA involves offensive actions using electromagnetic energy, while EP focuses on defensive measures to safeguard friendly operations.
Electronic warfare support (ES) involves actively disrupting enemy communications.
Answer: False
Explanation: Electronic Warfare Support (ES) primarily involves detecting, identifying, and locating sources of electromagnetic energy, rather than actively disrupting communications, which falls under Electronic Attack (EA).
Jamming is a technique used in electronic attack (EA) to disrupt enemy systems.
Answer: True
Explanation: Jamming is a fundamental technique within Electronic Attack (EA), employed to interfere with and disrupt enemy communications or radar systems by emitting targeted electromagnetic energy.
Anti-radiation weapons are designed to enhance enemy radar capabilities.
Answer: False
Explanation: Anti-radiation weapons are offensive tools utilized in Electronic Attack (EA) to target and destroy enemy radar and radio emitters by homing in on their emitted signals.
Electronic protection (EP) measures include using flares to distract infrared-guided missiles.
Answer: True
Explanation: The deployment of countermeasures such as flares, designed to decoy infrared-guided missiles, is a recognized example of Electronic Protection (EP).
Electronic warfare self-protection (EWSP) primarily refers to measures fitted to aircraft to protect them from enemy fire.
Answer: True
Explanation: Electronic Warfare Self-Protection (EWSP) specifically denotes countermeasures integrated into platforms, particularly aircraft, to defend against various threats, including enemy fire.
An electronic warfare tactics range (EWTR) is used for offensive electronic attack training only.
Answer: False
Explanation: Electronic Warfare Tactics Ranges (EWTRs) are utilized for comprehensive EW training, simulating various threats and scenarios for personnel, encompassing both offensive and defensive operational aspects.
Antifragile EW describes a system where capability improves when subjected to jamming.
Answer: True
Explanation: Antifragile EW refers to a specific type of electronic protection where a system's performance actually enhances under jamming conditions, a phenomenon dependent on precise jamming techniques.
The primary purpose of ES is to provide strategic intelligence for long-term planning.
Answer: False
Explanation: The primary purpose of Electronic Warfare Support (ES) is to furnish battlefield commanders with immediate threat recognition and targeting information, rather than long-term strategic intelligence.
NATO has retained traditional EW terms like ECM, EPM, and ESM to support broader EW activities.
Answer: True
Explanation: NATO continues to utilize traditional EW terminology, including Electronic Countermeasures (ECM), Electronic Protective Measures (EPM), and Electronic Support Measures (ESM), as these terms support and complement the broader EW activities.
Electronic warfare support (ES) actions are primarily focused on identifying and locating sources of electromagnetic energy.
Answer: True
Explanation: The principal function of Electronic Warfare Support (ES) is the detection, identification, and localization of electromagnetic energy sources to provide actionable intelligence for immediate threat recognition.
The term 'electronic countermeasures' (ECM) is the modern NATO term for electronic attack (EA).
Answer: False
Explanation: While related, Electronic Countermeasures (ECM) is a traditional term often used interchangeably with Electronic Attack (EA); however, EA is the current NATO designation for this function.
Which of the following is one of the three main subdivisions of electronic warfare?
Answer: Electronic Warfare Support (ES)
Explanation: The three principal subdivisions of electronic warfare are Electronic Attack (EA), Electronic Protection (EP), and Electronic Warfare Support (ES).
What is the purpose of Electronic Attack (EA)?
Answer: To degrade, neutralize, or destroy enemy combat capabilities using electromagnetic energy.
Explanation: The purpose of Electronic Attack (EA) is to degrade, neutralize, or destroy enemy combat capabilities through the application of electromagnetic energy, directed energy, or anti-radiation weapons.
Which traditional term is also known as Electronic Attack (EA)?
Answer: Electronic Countermeasures (ECM)
Explanation: Electronic Countermeasures (ECM) is a traditional term that is often used synonymously with Electronic Attack (EA), representing the offensive use of electromagnetic energy.
What action is taken during Electronic Protection (EP)?
Answer: Defending against enemy electronic attacks or preventing friendly interference.
Explanation: Electronic Protection (EP) involves implementing measures to defend against enemy electronic attacks or to prevent interference among friendly electronic systems.
Which of the following is an example of Electronic Protection (EP)?
Answer: Implementing emissions control (EMCON) and using low observability (stealth) technology.
Explanation: Implementing emissions control (EMCON) and employing low observability (stealth) technologies are examples of Electronic Protection (EP) measures designed to enhance survivability.
What is the primary function of Electronic Warfare Support (ES)?
Answer: To provide immediate threat recognition and targeting information for battlefield commanders.
Explanation: The primary function of Electronic Warfare Support (ES) is to furnish battlefield commanders with timely threat recognition and targeting data derived from electromagnetic emissions.
What is the significance of the term 'antifragile EW'?
Answer: It refers to EW systems that improve their capability when subjected to jamming.
Explanation: 'Antifragile EW' denotes electronic warfare systems designed such that their capabilities are enhanced when subjected to jamming, representing an advanced form of electronic protection.
Which traditional EW terms have been retained by NATO to support broader EW activities?
Answer: ECM, EPM, ESM
Explanation: NATO retains traditional terms such as Electronic Countermeasures (ECM), Electronic Protective Measures (EPM), and Electronic Support Measures (ESM) to complement and support its broader EW framework.
The earliest documented use of electronic warfare involved jamming Boer signals using searchlights during the Second Boer War.
Answer: True
Explanation: The Second Boer War is cited as the historical context for the earliest documented instance of electronic warfare, involving British attempts to disrupt Boer communications using searchlights.
During World War II, chaff was introduced to enhance enemy radar tracking.
Answer: False
Explanation: During World War II, chaff was developed and deployed as a countermeasure (Electronic Attack) intended to confuse and degrade enemy radar tracking systems, not enhance them.
During the Russo-Japanese War, a Russian admiral's decision not to jam Japanese radio communications potentially contributed to their naval defeat.
Answer: True
Explanation: Historical accounts suggest that a Russian admiral's refusal to permit jamming of Japanese radio communications during the Russo-Japanese War may have compromised crucial intelligence gathering, contributing to their naval defeat.
In the Vietnam War, US aircraft heavily relied on EW for survival, and Vietnamese counter-measures were ineffective.
Answer: False
Explanation: While US aircraft relied heavily on EW during the Vietnam War for survival, Vietnamese electronic counter-countermeasures (ECCM) were often effective, posing a significant challenge.
During the Gulf War, EW was used to disrupt Iraq's surface-to-air missile (SAM) and ground-controlled interception (GCI) networks.
Answer: True
Explanation: The Gulf War saw extensive use of EW by coalition forces, specifically targeting and disrupting Iraq's integrated air defense system, including surface-to-air missile (SAM) and ground-controlled interception (GCI) networks.
Israel's Operation Orchard involved using EW to enhance Syrian air defenses.
Answer: False
Explanation: Operation Orchard involved Israeli EW systems being employed to disrupt Syrian air defenses, thereby facilitating the safe passage and return of Israeli aircraft.
What historical event saw the earliest documented use of electronic warfare, involving jamming Boer signals with searchlights?
Answer: The Second Boer War
Explanation: The earliest documented application of electronic warfare, involving the use of searchlights for jamming signals, occurred during the Second Boer War.
What role did EW play for aircraft survival during the Vietnam War?
Answer: Aircraft relied heavily on it, but Vietnamese counter-measures (ECCM) were often effective.
Explanation: During the Vietnam War, electronic warfare was critical for aircraft survival, though it faced significant challenges from effective Vietnamese electronic counter-countermeasures (ECCM).
How was EW employed by US forces during the Gulf War?
Answer: To disrupt Iraq's surface-to-air missile (SAM) and ground-controlled interception (GCI) networks.
Explanation: During the Gulf War, electronic warfare was extensively utilized by U.S. forces to disrupt Iraq's integrated air defense systems, including surface-to-air missile (SAM) and ground-controlled interception (GCI) networks.
What was the function of Israeli EW systems in Operation Orchard?
Answer: To disrupt Syrian air defenses, allowing Israeli jets to operate safely.
Explanation: In Operation Orchard, Israeli electronic warfare systems were employed to disrupt Syrian air defenses, thereby ensuring the safe passage and return of Israeli aircraft.
Cognitive Electronic Warfare (CEW) integrates artificial intelligence (AI) to improve EW system capabilities.
Answer: True
Explanation: Cognitive Electronic Warfare (CEW) represents an advancement in digital EW, characterized by the integration of artificial intelligence to enhance system performance and adaptability in dynamic electromagnetic environments.
The Russian Krasukha system is designed for electronic protection (EP).
Answer: False
Explanation: The Krasukha system is identified as a Russian electronic warfare system designed for Electronic Attack (EA), specifically intended to jam airborne radars and missiles.
The Borisoglebsk 2 system is a Russian air-based EW system focused on jamming enemy aircraft radar.
Answer: False
Explanation: The Borisoglebsk 2 is a Russian land-based EW system designed to suppress satellite communications and navigation signals, not an air-based system for jamming aircraft radar.
In the 2022 invasion of Ukraine, Russian EW initially disrupted Ukrainian air defense but later allowed Ukrainian SAMs to regain effectiveness.
Answer: True
Explanation: Initial Russian EW efforts in Ukraine disrupted Ukrainian air defenses; however, subsequent interference with Russian communications and Ukrainian adaptation allowed Ukrainian SAMs to regain operational effectiveness.
Russian EW complexes in Ukraine significantly reduced Ukrainian drone losses by improving GPS signal stability.
Answer: False
Explanation: Reports indicate that Russian EW complexes in Ukraine caused significant losses of Ukrainian UAVs by disrupting GPS and radio signals, thereby reducing their operational capabilities.
The disruption of GPS signals by Russian EW improved the accuracy of weapons like HIMARS and JDAMs.
Answer: False
Explanation: Russian EW's disruption of GPS signals negatively impacted the accuracy of precision-guided munitions such as HIMARS and JDAMs, forcing reliance on less precise inertial navigation.
Electronic warfare systems using AI to automatically classify new signals and adapt to the electromagnetic spectrum.
Answer: True
Explanation: Cognitive Electronic Warfare (CEW) systems leverage artificial intelligence to automate the detection and classification of novel signals, facilitating real-time adaptation to the dynamic electromagnetic spectrum.
DARPA has utilized CEW in SIGINT studies, employing projects like Blade and ARC.
Answer: True
Explanation: The Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA) has conducted Cognitive Electronic Warfare (CEW) studies within Signals Intelligence (SIGINT), notably through projects such as Blade and ARC.
The Israel Aerospace Industries' Scorpius system can disrupt radar and communications across various platforms.
Answer: True
Explanation: The Scorpius system, developed by Israel Aerospace Industries, possesses the capability to simultaneously disrupt radar and communication signals across diverse platforms, including ships and UAVs.
The effectiveness of Ukrainian electronic warfare against Russian drones has been reported as increasing.
Answer: True
Explanation: Reports indicate a growing effectiveness of Ukrainian electronic warfare capabilities in countering Russian drone operations, leading to increased success rates against these platforms.
Which Russian EW system is mentioned as being designed to jam airborne radars, particularly those used by AWACS aircraft?
Answer: Krasukha
Explanation: The Krasukha system is identified as a Russian EW system specifically designed to jam airborne radars, including those utilized by AWACS aircraft.
What capability does the Israel Aerospace Industries' Scorpius system possess?
Answer: It can simultaneously disrupt radar and communications from multiple platforms like ships and UAVs.
Explanation: The Scorpius system from Israel Aerospace Industries is capable of simultaneously disrupting radar and communication signals across various platforms, such as ships and unmanned aerial vehicles.
How has Ukrainian electronic warfare reportedly impacted Russian drones?
Answer: It has led to increased success against Russian drones, causing them to fail their missions.
Explanation: Reports indicate that Ukrainian electronic warfare efforts have achieved greater success against Russian drones, leading to mission failures due to signal disruption.
What is Cognitive Electronic Warfare (CEW)?
Answer: An evolution of digital EW integrating artificial intelligence (AI).
Explanation: Cognitive Electronic Warfare (CEW) represents an advancement in digital EW, characterized by the integration of artificial intelligence to enhance system capabilities and adaptability.
How does AI contribute to CEW systems?
Answer: By automating signal detection, classification, and enabling real-time adaptation.
Explanation: Artificial intelligence in CEW systems facilitates automated signal detection and classification, enhances situational assessment, and enables real-time adaptation to the electromagnetic spectrum.
Which organization has utilized CEW in SIGINT studies, employing projects like Blade and ARC?
Answer: DARPA (Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency)
Explanation: DARPA (Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency) has conducted Cognitive Electronic Warfare (CEW) studies within SIGINT, utilizing projects such as Blade and ARC.
What is the Borisoglebsk 2 system, according to the source?
Answer: A Russian land-based EW system targeting satellite communications and navigation.
Explanation: The Borisoglebsk 2 is identified as a Russian land-based electronic warfare system designed to suppress satellite communications and navigation signals.
What impact did Russian EW have on Ukrainian UAVs during the 2022 invasion?
Answer: It caused heavy losses by suppressing GPS and radio signals, reducing mission success.
Explanation: Russian EW systems deployed in Ukraine reportedly inflicted substantial losses on Ukrainian UAVs by suppressing GPS and radio signals, thereby diminishing their operational success rates.
How did Russian EW affect the accuracy of precision-guided munitions like HIMARS and JDAMs?
Answer: It reduced their accuracy by disrupting GPS signals, forcing reliance on inertial navigation.
Explanation: Russian EW's disruption of GPS signals compromised the accuracy of precision-guided munitions such as HIMARS and JDAMs, necessitating a greater reliance on inertial navigation systems.
Signals intelligence (SIGINT) is completely separate from electronic warfare support (ES).
Answer: False
Explanation: Signals Intelligence (SIGINT) and Electronic Warfare Support (ES) are closely related disciplines with significant overlap, often sharing collection assets and data, and are not entirely separate.
Communications intelligence (COMINT) involves the analysis of non-communication signals like radar.
Answer: False
Explanation: Communications Intelligence (COMINT) specifically pertains to the interception and analysis of communication signals, whereas radar and other non-communication signals fall under Electronic Intelligence (ELINT).
The distinction between SIGINT and ES is solely based on the type of information collected.
Answer: False
Explanation: The distinction between SIGINT and ES is multifaceted, involving factors such as control of collection assets, the nature of the information provided, and the intended operational purpose, not solely the type of data collected.
Electronic warfare is considered an element of information warfare within broader information operations.
Answer: True
Explanation: Within the comprehensive framework of information operations, EW is recognized as an integral element of information warfare and contributes to counterinformation strategies.
How is Electronic Warfare (EW) categorized within Information Operations?
Answer: As an element of information warfare and a component of counterinformation strategies.
Explanation: Within the broader context of information operations, EW is recognized as an integral element of information warfare and contributes to counterinformation strategies.
What is the distinction between SIGINT and ES based on control and purpose?
Answer: ES is typically for tactical information under a commander's control, while SIGINT can be for strategic intelligence purposes.
Explanation: The distinction between SIGINT and ES lies in their typical control and purpose: ES generally provides tactical information under direct command control, whereas SIGINT often serves broader strategic intelligence objectives.
The image of US Space Force personnel operating a satellite antenna relates to EW training exercises.
Answer: True
Explanation: The imagery depicting US Space Force personnel operating a satellite antenna is associated with military exercises focused on electronic warfare capabilities.
The image of the USAF Boeing E-4 shows it being tested against a simulated electromagnetic pulse (EMP).
Answer: True
Explanation: The photograph of the USAF Boeing E-4 advanced airborne command post illustrates it undergoing testing within an electromagnetic pulse (EMP) simulator environment, highlighting its resilience testing.
RAF Menwith Hill is identified as a site relevant to electronic intelligence gathering under the UK-USA Security Agreement.
Answer: True
Explanation: RAF Menwith Hill is recognized as a significant facility involved in electronic intelligence gathering, operating under the framework of the UK-USA Security Agreement.
The image of the downed Russian Grifon 12 drone shows Ukrainian personnel displaying drone jammers.
Answer: True
Explanation: The image of a downed Russian Grifon 12 drone depicts Ukrainian personnel exhibiting drone jamming equipment, illustrating the practical application of EW countermeasures in the conflict.
What does the image of the USAF Boeing E-4 undergoing testing depict?
Answer: Testing on an electromagnetic pulse (EMP) simulator.
Explanation: The image of the USAF Boeing E-4 advanced airborne command post illustrates its testing within an electromagnetic pulse (EMP) simulator, highlighting its resilience testing.