Enter a player name to begin or load your saved progress.
The Federal Court of Appeal was created as a separate entity in 2003.
Answer: True
Explanation: The Federal Court of Appeal was established as a distinct court on July 2, 2003, pursuant to the Courts Administration Service Act. This legislative action separated the appellate functions from the former Federal Court of Canada.
Parliament's authority to establish federal courts stems from Section 101 of the Constitution Act, 1867.
Answer: True
Explanation: Section 101 of the Constitution Act, 1867, explicitly empowers the Parliament of Canada to constitute courts inferior to the Supreme Court of Canada, thereby providing the constitutional foundation for federal courts such as the Federal Court of Appeal.
The Federal Court of Canada, created in 1971, initially had only one division.
Answer: False
Explanation: The Federal Court of Canada, established in 1971, was initially constituted with two divisions: the Trial Division and the Appeal Division.
The Exchequer Court of Canada was replaced by the Appeal Division of the Federal Court.
Answer: False
Explanation: The Exchequer Court of Canada was succeeded by the Trial Division of the Federal Court of Canada upon its establishment in 1971. The Appeal Division was a separate component of the new Federal Court.
The Federal Court of Appeal inherited the trial functions when the Federal Court was split.
Answer: False
Explanation: When the Federal Court of Canada was split into two separate courts in 2003, the Federal Court of Appeal inherited the appellate functions, while the new Federal Court assumed the trial functions.
The Courts Administration Service Act was responsible for creating the Federal Court of Appeal as a distinct entity.
Answer: True
Explanation: The Courts Administration Service Act, enacted in 2003, formally established the Federal Court of Appeal as a separate court, distinct from the Federal Court.
The Federal Court of Appeal succeeded the Appeal Division of the Federal Court of Canada.
Answer: True
Explanation: Upon the legislative separation of the Federal Court into two distinct entities in 2003, the Federal Court of Appeal assumed the appellate responsibilities previously held by the Appeal Division of the Federal Court of Canada.
When was the Federal Court of Appeal officially established as a separate court?
Answer: 2003
Explanation: The Federal Court of Appeal was established as a distinct court on July 2, 2003, through the Courts Administration Service Act, which separated its appellate functions from the Federal Court.
Which of the following legal acts authorizes the existence and operation of the Federal Court of Appeal?
Answer: The Constitution Act, 1867, and the Federal Courts Act
Explanation: The Federal Court of Appeal's existence and jurisdiction are founded upon constitutional authority derived from Section 101 of the Constitution Act, 1867, and further defined by the Federal Courts Act and the Courts Administration Service Act.
Section 101 of which Act empowers the Parliament of Canada to establish federal courts?
Answer: Constitution Act, 1867
Explanation: Section 101 of the Constitution Act, 1867, grants Parliament the authority to establish courts inferior to the Supreme Court of Canada.
The Federal Court of Canada, established in 1971, originally comprised which two divisions?
Answer: Trial Division and Appeal Division
Explanation: Upon its creation in 1971, the Federal Court of Canada was structured into two divisions: the Trial Division and the Appeal Division.
Which court did the Trial Division of the Federal Court of Canada replace?
Answer: The Exchequer Court of Canada
Explanation: The Trial Division of the Federal Court of Canada, established in 1971, assumed the functions and jurisdiction previously exercised by the Exchequer Court of Canada.
The Federal Court of Appeal inherited which functions when the Federal Court was split?
Answer: Appellate functions
Explanation: Upon the legislative division of the Federal Court of Canada in 2003, the Federal Court of Appeal was constituted to handle the appellate jurisdiction, while the new Federal Court assumed the trial functions.
The Federal Court of Appeal is Canada's highest court for matters involving federal law.
Answer: False
Explanation: The Supreme Court of Canada serves as the ultimate judicial authority for all legal matters in Canada, including those involving federal law. The Federal Court of Appeal's primary role is to hear appeals from decisions rendered by the Federal Court and the Tax Court of Canada.
The Federal Court of Appeal operates under the authority of the Criminal Code of Canada.
Answer: False
Explanation: The Federal Court of Appeal's operations and jurisdiction are primarily governed by the Constitution Act, 1867, the Federal Courts Act, and the Courts Administration Service Act, not the Criminal Code of Canada.
The primary function of the Federal Court of Appeal is to hear cases concerning federal matters within Canada.
Answer: True
Explanation: The principal mandate of the Federal Court of Appeal is to adjudicate appeals arising from decisions made by the Federal Court and the Tax Court of Canada, thereby addressing matters of federal law.
The Federal Court of Appeal exclusively hears appeals from the Federal Court.
Answer: False
Explanation: In addition to hearing appeals from the Federal Court, the Federal Court of Appeal also adjudicates appeals from decisions of the Tax Court of Canada.
The Federal Court of Appeal hears appeals from decisions made by the Provincial Courts of Appeal.
Answer: False
Explanation: The Federal Court of Appeal's jurisdiction does not extend to hearing appeals from provincial courts of appeal. Its appellate mandate is limited to appeals from the Federal Court and the Tax Court of Canada.
What is the primary role of the Federal Court of Appeal?
Answer: To hear appeals from decisions of the Federal Court and the Tax Court of Canada.
Explanation: The Federal Court of Appeal's principal function is to hear and determine appeals from judgments rendered by the Federal Court and the Tax Court of Canada.
Appeals from the Federal Court of Appeal are ultimately heard by which court?
Answer: The Supreme Court of Canada
Explanation: Appeals from decisions of the Federal Court of Appeal may be further appealed to the Supreme Court of Canada, which serves as the final court of appeal in the Canadian judicial system.
Besides the Federal Court, from which other court does the Federal Court of Appeal hear appeals?
Answer: The Tax Court of Canada
Explanation: The Federal Court of Appeal hears appeals not only from the Federal Court but also from decisions rendered by the Tax Court of Canada.
The Federal Court of Appeal does not possess any original jurisdiction.
Answer: False
Explanation: The Federal Court of Appeal does possess original jurisdiction, notably in applications for judicial review of decisions made by federal boards, commissions, and tribunals, as well as certain specific statutory appeals.
The Canadian Radio-television and Telecommunications Commission (CRTC) is one of the tribunals whose decisions can be judicially reviewed by the Federal Court of Appeal.
Answer: True
Explanation: Under section 28 of the Federal Courts Act, the Federal Court of Appeal exercises jurisdiction to review decisions of numerous federal tribunals, including the Canadian Radio-television and Telecommunications Commission (CRTC).
The Federal Court of Appeal exercises original jurisdiction over applications for judicial review.
Answer: True
Explanation: The Federal Court of Appeal possesses original jurisdiction concerning applications for judicial review of decisions made by federal boards, commissions, and tribunals, as stipulated by section 28 of the Federal Courts Act.
The Federal Court of Appeal has original jurisdiction over the Canada Industrial Relations Board.
Answer: True
Explanation: The Federal Court of Appeal exercises original jurisdiction for judicial review of decisions made by federal boards, commissions, and tribunals, which includes the Canada Industrial Relations Board.
What type of original jurisdiction does the Federal Court of Appeal exercise?
Answer: Judicial review of federal tribunals and certain specific appeals.
Explanation: The Federal Court of Appeal exercises original jurisdiction primarily through applications for judicial review of decisions made by federal boards, commissions, and tribunals, as well as specific statutory appeals.
Which of the following is NOT listed as a federal tribunal subject to judicial review by the Federal Court of Appeal under section 28 of the Federal Courts Act?
Answer: Provincial Human Rights Commissions
Explanation: The Federal Court of Appeal's judicial review jurisdiction under section 28 of the Federal Courts Act pertains to federal tribunals. Provincial Human Rights Commissions are provincial bodies, and their decisions are typically subject to provincial superior court review.
The Federal Court of Appeal is headquartered in Toronto, Ontario.
Answer: False
Explanation: The Federal Court of Appeal is constitutionally and administratively based in Ottawa, Ontario, serving as its primary seat of justice.
The Federal Court of Appeal has a total of 20 judicial positions.
Answer: False
Explanation: The Federal Court of Appeal is authorized to have a total of 18 judicial positions, comprising one Chief Justice and seventeen puisne judges.
Judges' salaries for the Federal Court of Appeal are set by the Prime Minister.
Answer: False
Explanation: Judges' salaries are determined annually by the Judicial Compensation and Benefits Commission, not directly set by the Prime Minister.
The notation (S) next to a judge's name signifies they are the Chief Justice.
Answer: False
Explanation: The notation (S) next to a judge's name indicates that the judge is a supernumerary judge, signifying a reduced caseload while retaining their judicial status, not that they are the Chief Justice.
Where is the Federal Court of Appeal primarily located?
Answer: Ottawa, Ontario
Explanation: The Federal Court of Appeal maintains its principal seat and headquarters in Ottawa, Ontario.
How many judicial positions are designated for the Federal Court of Appeal?
Answer: 18
Explanation: The Federal Court of Appeal is authorized to have a total of 18 judicial positions, consisting of one Chief Justice and seventeen puisne judges.
What does the notation (S) next to a judge's name in the navbox signify?
Answer: Supernumerary Judge
Explanation: The notation (S) adjacent to a judge's name indicates that the individual holds the status of a supernumerary judge, signifying a reduced judicial workload while retaining their position.
Yves de Montigny is the current Chief Justice of the Federal Court of Appeal, appointed in 2021.
Answer: False
Explanation: While Yves de Montigny is the current Chief Justice, his appointment to that specific role occurred in 2023. He was initially appointed as a puisne judge of the Federal Court of Appeal in 2015.
Richard Boivin was appointed to the Federal Court of Appeal after serving on the Tax Court of Canada.
Answer: False
Explanation: Richard Boivin was appointed to the Federal Court of Appeal after previously serving as a judge on the Federal Court, not the Tax Court of Canada.
David W. Stratas was appointed to the Federal Court of Appeal in 2009.
Answer: True
Explanation: David W. Stratas was appointed to the Federal Court of Appeal in 2009 by Prime Minister Stephen Harper.
Mary J. L. Gleason previously served as a judge on the Tax Court of Canada before joining the Federal Court of Appeal.
Answer: False
Explanation: Mary J. L. Gleason served on the Federal Court prior to her appointment to the Federal Court of Appeal in 2015.
Judith Woods was appointed to the Federal Court of Appeal under Prime Minister Justin Trudeau.
Answer: True
Explanation: Judith Woods was appointed to the Federal Court of Appeal in 2016, during the tenure of Prime Minister Justin Trudeau.
John B. Laskin's background before his 2017 appointment involved being a partner at a major law firm.
Answer: True
Explanation: Prior to his appointment to the Federal Court of Appeal in 2017, John B. Laskin was a partner at Torys LLP, a prominent law firm.
Anne Mactavish served on the Federal Court before her appointment to the Federal Court of Appeal in 2019.
Answer: True
Explanation: Anne Mactavish's prior judicial experience included service on the Federal Court before her appointment to the Federal Court of Appeal in 2019.
René Leblanc previously served on the Tax Court of Canada before his appointment to the Federal Court of Appeal.
Answer: False
Explanation: René Leblanc served on the Federal Court prior to his appointment to the Federal Court of Appeal in 2020.
Siobhan Monaghan was appointed to the Federal Court of Appeal in 2021, having previously served on the Federal Court.
Answer: False
Explanation: Siobhan Monaghan was appointed to the Federal Court of Appeal in 2021, having previously served on the Tax Court of Canada.
Sylvie Roussel was appointed to the Federal Court of Appeal in 2022 after practicing law privately.
Answer: False
Explanation: Sylvie Roussel was appointed to the Federal Court of Appeal in 2022 after previously serving as a judge on the Federal Court.
Nathalie Goyette was appointed to the Federal Court of Appeal in 2022, having previously been a partner at Davies.
Answer: True
Explanation: Nathalie Goyette was appointed to the Federal Court of Appeal in 2022. Prior to her appointment, she was a partner at the law firm Davies.
Gerald Heckman was appointed to the Federal Court of Appeal in 2023 after serving as a judge on the Federal Court.
Answer: False
Explanation: Gerald Heckman was appointed to the Federal Court of Appeal in 2023. Prior to this, he held a position as a Professor at the University of Manitoba, not as a judge on the Federal Court.
Monica Biringer was appointed to the Federal Court of Appeal in 2023, previously serving on the Federal Court.
Answer: False
Explanation: Monica Biringer was appointed to the Federal Court of Appeal in 2023, having previously served as a judge on the Tax Court of Canada.
Elizabeth Walker was appointed to the Federal Court of Appeal in 2024, having previously served on the Tax Court of Canada.
Answer: False
Explanation: Elizabeth Walker was appointed to the Federal Court of Appeal in 2024, having previously served on the Federal Court.
Vanessa Rochester was appointed to the Federal Court of Appeal in 2024, previously serving on the Federal Court.
Answer: True
Explanation: Vanessa Rochester was appointed to the Federal Court of Appeal in 2024, having previously served on the Federal Court.
Panagiotis Pamel was appointed to the Federal Court of Appeal in 2024 after serving on the Tax Court of Canada.
Answer: False
Explanation: Panagiotis Pamel was appointed to the Federal Court of Appeal in 2024, having previously served on the Federal Court.
Wyman W. Webb was appointed to the Federal Court of Appeal in 2012, having previously served on the Federal Court.
Answer: False
Explanation: Wyman W. Webb was appointed to the Federal Court of Appeal in 2012, having previously served on the Tax Court of Canada.
Yves De Montigny was first appointed to the Federal Court of Appeal under Prime Minister Justin Trudeau.
Answer: False
Explanation: Yves De Montigny was initially appointed as a puisne judge of the Federal Court of Appeal in 2015 under Prime Minister Stephen Harper. He later became Chief Justice in 2023 under Prime Minister Justin Trudeau.
Who is the current Chief Justice of the Federal Court of Appeal as of the source information?
Answer: Yves de Montigny
Explanation: Yves de Montigny currently holds the position of Chief Justice of the Federal Court of Appeal. He assumed this role in 2023.
Who appointed Justice Richard Boivin to the Federal Court of Appeal, and what was his prior judicial role?
Answer: Stephen Harper; Federal Court
Explanation: Richard Boivin was appointed to the Federal Court of Appeal in 2011 by Prime Minister Stephen Harper, having previously served as a judge on the Federal Court.
Before joining the Federal Court of Appeal in 2009, David W. Stratas held what position?
Answer: Partner at Heenan Blaikie LLP
Explanation: Prior to his appointment to the Federal Court of Appeal in 2009, David W. Stratas was a partner at the law firm Heenan Blaikie LLP.
Which Prime Minister appointed Wyman W. Webb to the Federal Court of Appeal in 2012?
Answer: Stephen Harper
Explanation: Wyman W. Webb was appointed to the Federal Court of Appeal in 2012 by Prime Minister Stephen Harper.
What was Mary J. L. Gleason's previous judicial affiliation before her appointment to the Federal Court of Appeal in 2015?
Answer: Federal Court
Explanation: Before her appointment to the Federal Court of Appeal in 2015, Mary J. L. Gleason served as a judge on the Federal Court.
Judith Woods, appointed in 2016, previously served on which court?
Answer: Tax Court of Canada
Explanation: Prior to her appointment to the Federal Court of Appeal in 2016, Judith Woods served as a judge on the Tax Court of Canada.
John B. Laskin was appointed to the Federal Court of Appeal in 2017. What was his professional background?
Answer: Partner at Torys LLP
Explanation: Before his appointment to the Federal Court of Appeal in 2017, John B. Laskin practiced as a partner at Torys LLP.
Who appointed George R. Locke to the Federal Court of Appeal, and what was his prior judicial experience?
Answer: Justin Trudeau; Federal Court
Explanation: George R. Locke was appointed to the Federal Court of Appeal in 2019 by Prime Minister Justin Trudeau. He previously served on the Federal Court.
Anne Mactavish's prior experience before her 2019 appointment to the Federal Court of Appeal included service on which court?
Answer: Federal Court
Explanation: Before her appointment to the Federal Court of Appeal in 2019, Anne Mactavish had served as a judge on the Federal Court.
René Leblanc was appointed to the Federal Court of Appeal in 2020. What was his previous judicial office?
Answer: Federal Court
Explanation: René Leblanc served on the Federal Court prior to his appointment to the Federal Court of Appeal in 2020.
Siobhan Monaghan, appointed in 2021, previously served on which court?
Answer: Tax Court of Canada
Explanation: Siobhan Monaghan was appointed to the Federal Court of Appeal in 2021, having previously served as a judge on the Tax Court of Canada.
Sylvie Roussel was appointed to the Federal Court of Appeal in 2022. What was her prior judicial role?
Answer: Judge on the Federal Court
Explanation: Prior to her appointment to the Federal Court of Appeal in 2022, Sylvie Roussel served as a judge on the Federal Court.
Nathalie Goyette was appointed in 2022. What was her professional background prior to this appointment?
Answer: Partner at Davies
Explanation: Before her appointment to the Federal Court of Appeal in 2022, Nathalie Goyette was a partner at the law firm Davies.
Gerald Heckman was appointed to the Federal Court of Appeal in 2023. What was his role before this appointment?
Answer: Professor at the University of Manitoba
Explanation: Prior to his appointment to the Federal Court of Appeal in 2023, Gerald Heckman held a professorial position at the University of Manitoba.
Monica Biringer, appointed in 2023, previously held a judicial position on which court?
Answer: Tax Court of Canada
Explanation: Monica Biringer was appointed to the Federal Court of Appeal in 2023, having previously served as a judge on the Tax Court of Canada.
Who appointed Elizabeth Walker to the Federal Court of Appeal in 2024?
Answer: Justin Trudeau
Explanation: Elizabeth Walker was appointed to the Federal Court of Appeal in 2024 by Prime Minister Justin Trudeau.
What was Panagiotis Pamel's prior judicial role before his 2024 appointment?
Answer: Judge on the Federal Court
Explanation: Before his appointment to the Federal Court of Appeal in 2024, Panagiotis Pamel served as a judge on the Federal Court.
A 2014 ruling by the Federal Court of Appeal extended certain Aboriginal protections to off-reserve Métis people.
Answer: True
Explanation: In April 2014, the Federal Court of Appeal issued a significant ruling that recognized and extended certain Aboriginal protections to Métis people residing off-reserve.
The Federal Court of Appeal upheld a ban on the niqab at citizenship ceremonies in a 2015 decision.
Answer: False
Explanation: In September 2015, the Federal Court of Appeal dismissed an appeal by the Government of Canada against a Federal Court ruling that had found a rule banning the niqab at citizenship ceremonies to be unconstitutional.
What was the significance of the Federal Court of Appeal's April 2014 ruling concerning the Métis people?
Answer: It recognized specific Aboriginal protections for off-reserve Métis.
Explanation: The Federal Court of Appeal's April 2014 ruling affirmed specific Aboriginal protections for Métis individuals residing off-reserve, marking a significant development in Indigenous rights law.
The 'Canadian law' sidebar lists only statutes as sources of law.
Answer: False
Explanation: The 'Canadian law' sidebar lists the Constitution of Canada, Federal statutes, and Provincial statutes as sources of law. It also implicitly includes common law principles through its mention of core legal areas.
Administrative law is considered a core area of Canadian law according to the sidebar.
Answer: True
Explanation: The 'Canadian law' sidebar explicitly identifies Administrative law as one of the core areas of Canadian law.
The 'Canadian law' sidebar details Intellectual property law but does not specify its sub-categories.
Answer: False
Explanation: The 'Canadian law' sidebar details Intellectual Property law and explicitly lists its sub-categories, including Copyright, Patent, Trademark, and Trade secrets.
Provincial/Territorial courts are listed under the 'Courts' section in the sidebar.
Answer: True
Explanation: The 'Courts' section within the 'Canadian law' sidebar enumerates various levels of courts, including Provincial/Territorial courts, alongside federal courts.
The 'See also' section provides a link to information about the history of the Canadian judiciary.
Answer: False
Explanation: The 'See also' section in the provided context links to 'Portal: Canada' and a 'List of notable Canadian Courts of Appeal cases,' not directly to the history of the Canadian judiciary.
Ian Bushnell authored 'The Federal Court of Appeal and the Federal Court: 50 Years of History'.
Answer: False
Explanation: Ian Bushnell authored 'The Federal Court of Canada: A History, 1875-1992.' The book 'The Federal Court of Appeal and the Federal Court: 50 Years of History' has a different author and ISBN.
The ISBN 978-1-55221-548-7 is associated with a book detailing 50 years of history for the Federal Court of Appeal and the Federal Court.
Answer: True
Explanation: The ISBN 978-1-55221-548-7 corresponds to the publication 'The Federal Court of Appeal and the Federal Court: 50 Years of History'.
The 'Authority control' section indicates the Federal Court of Appeal is listed in the United States Library of Congress authorities.
Answer: True
Explanation: The 'Authority control' section confirms that the Federal Court of Appeal is cataloged within the United States Library of Congress authorities, alongside international databases like VIAF and ISNI.
The official website address for the Federal Court of Appeal is www.fca-caf.gc.ca.
Answer: True
Explanation: The official web domain for the Federal Court of Appeal is indeed www.fca-caf.gc.ca, providing access to court information and resources.
Which of the following is listed as a core area of Canadian law in the sidebar?
Answer: Property Law
Explanation: The 'Canadian law' sidebar identifies Property Law as one of the core areas of Canadian law, alongside Constitutional, Administrative, Criminal, Contract, and Tort law.
The 'Canadian law' sidebar lists which of the following as sources of Canadian law?
Answer: Constitution of Canada, Federal Statutes, and Provincial Statutes
Explanation: The 'Canadian law' sidebar explicitly lists the Constitution of Canada, Federal statutes, and Provincial statutes as primary sources of Canadian law.
Which courts are mentioned in the 'Courts' section of the 'Canadian law' sidebar?
Answer: Supreme Court, Federal Court, Appeal Court, Tax Court, Provincial/Territorial Courts
Explanation: The 'Courts' section of the 'Canadian law' sidebar enumerates the Supreme Court, Federal Court, Federal Court of Appeal (referred to as Appeal Court), Tax Court, and various Provincial/Territorial courts, including Courts of Appeal and Superior Courts.
Which of the following is NOT listed as an area of law detailed in the 'Canadian law' sidebar?
Answer: Environmental Law
Explanation: The 'Canadian law' sidebar details areas such as Family Law, Criminal Law, and Labour and Employment Law, but Environmental Law is not explicitly listed among the detailed categories.
What does the 'Authority control' section suggest about the Federal Court of Appeal's international recognition?
Answer: It is listed in international databases like VIAF and ISNI.
Explanation: The 'Authority control' section indicates that the Federal Court of Appeal is cataloged in international databases such as VIAF and ISNI, alongside national authorities like the U.S. Library of Congress.