Enter a player name to begin or load your saved progress.
Forward Operating Base Danger was primarily operated by the United States Marine Corps.
Answer: False
Explanation: The source explicitly states that Forward Operating Base Danger was operated by the United States Army, not the Marine Corps.
Saddam Hussein's presidential palace complex in Tikrit served as the central point of Forward Operating Base Danger.
Answer: True
Explanation: The source confirms that Saddam Hussein's presidential palace complex in Tikrit was indeed the central point of Forward Operating Base Danger.
The initial designation of the installation that subsequently became Forward Operating Base Danger was Forward Operating Base Patriot.
Answer: False
Explanation: The installation that became Forward Operating Base Danger was initially named Forward Operating Base Ironhorse, not Patriot.
Forward Operating Base Danger was situated in East Baghdad.
Answer: False
Explanation: Forward Operating Base Danger was located in Tikrit, Northern Iraq, not East Baghdad. Other FOBs like Iron Horse, Patriot, and Loyalty were in East Baghdad.
Forward Operating Base Danger was primarily utilized for humanitarian aid distribution during the Iraq War.
Answer: False
Explanation: The primary purpose of Forward Operating Base Danger was to support tactical military operations, not humanitarian aid distribution.
Forward Operating Base Danger was associated with the Vietnam War.
Answer: False
Explanation: Forward Operating Base Danger was associated with the Iraq War, not the Vietnam War.
The primary function of Forward Operating Base Danger was to serve as a prison facility.
Answer: False
Explanation: Forward Operating Base Danger's primary purpose was to support tactical military operations, not to house a prison. The East Baghdad FOB Ironhorse housed a prison.
The presidential palace complex in Tikrit constituted the core of Forward Operating Base Danger.
Answer: True
Explanation: The source indicates that Saddam Hussein's presidential palace complex in Tikrit served as the central point and core of Forward Operating Base Danger.
Forward Operating Base Danger was situated in the northern region of Iraq.
Answer: True
Explanation: Forward Operating Base Danger was located in Tikrit, which is in Northern Iraq.
Which military branch primarily operated Forward Operating Base Danger?
Answer: United States Army
Explanation: Forward Operating Base Danger was operated by the United States Army.
What was the initial designation of the installation in Tikrit that subsequently became Forward Operating Base Danger?
Answer: Forward Operating Base Ironhorse
Explanation: The installation that became Forward Operating Base Danger was initially founded as Forward Operating Base Ironhorse.
What prominent structure served as the central point and dominated Forward Operating Base Danger?
Answer: Saddam Hussein's presidential palace
Explanation: Saddam Hussein's presidential palace complex in Tikrit served as the central point and dominant structure of Forward Operating Base Danger.
What constituted the primary strategic objective of Forward Operating Base Danger for the United States Army?
Answer: To support tactical military operations.
Explanation: Forward Operating Base Danger served as a military installation used to support tactical operations for the United States Army.
With which major military conflict was Forward Operating Base Danger associated?
Answer: Iraq War
Explanation: Forward Operating Base Danger was associated with the Iraq War.
What classification of military installation was Forward Operating Base Danger?
Answer: A forward operating base
Explanation: Forward Operating Base Danger was classified as a forward operating base, a secure operational facility used to support military operations.
In which specific geographical region of Iraq was Forward Operating Base Danger situated?
Answer: Northern Iraq
Explanation: Forward Operating Base Danger was located in Tikrit, which is in Northern Iraq.
What function did Saddam Hussein's presidential palace complex in Tikrit serve for Forward Operating Base Danger?
Answer: It served as the central point of the base.
Explanation: Saddam Hussein's presidential palace complex in Tikrit dominated Forward Operating Base Danger, serving as its central point.
Forward Operating Base Danger was utilized by the United States Army from 2003 until December 2005.
Answer: False
Explanation: The United States Army operated Forward Operating Base Danger from 2003 until November 2005, not December 2005.
The 4th Infantry Division garrisoned FOB Danger from March 2004 to February 2005.
Answer: False
Explanation: The 4th Infantry Division garrisoned FOB Danger from March 2003 to March 2004, not from March 2004 to February 2005. The latter period was for the 1st Infantry Division.
The 42nd Infantry Division was the final United States Army division to garrison Forward Operating Base Danger prior to its handover.
Answer: True
Explanation: The 42nd Infantry Division garrisoned FOB Danger from February to November 2005, and the base was handed over in November 2005, making them the last division.
The 1st Infantry Division maintained garrison duties at Forward Operating Base Danger for a longer duration than the 4th Infantry Division.
Answer: False
Explanation: The 1st Infantry Division garrisoned FOB Danger from March 2004 to February 2005 (11 months), while the 4th Infantry Division garrisoned it from March 2003 to March 2004 (12 months). Therefore, the 1st ID's tenure was shorter.
The 4th Infantry Division served as the headquarters garrison for the installation, then known as Forward Operating Base Ironhorse, from April 2003 until its redesignation in May 2004.
Answer: True
Explanation: The source confirms that the 4th Infantry Division was the headquarters garrison for FOB Ironhorse from April 2003 until its redesignation in May 2004.
The 1st Infantry Division Headquarters issued a press release concerning 'Task Force Danger' in July 2004.
Answer: True
Explanation: Headquarters, 1st Infantry Division, issued a press release on July 4, 2004, related to 'Task Force Danger'.
The 42nd Infantry Division's deployment at Forward Operating Base Danger spanned approximately nine months.
Answer: True
Explanation: The 42nd Infantry Division was present from February to November 2005, which is a duration of nine months.
The 4th Infantry Division's tenure as headquarters garrison at the installation (then Forward Operating Base Ironhorse) concluded in March 2004.
Answer: False
Explanation: The 4th Infantry Division's tenure as headquarters garrison for FOB Ironhorse ended in May 2004, not March 2004.
The 1st Infantry Division's deployment at Forward Operating Base Danger concluded in February 2005.
Answer: True
Explanation: The 1st Infantry Division was present at Forward Operating Base Danger from March 2004 to February 2005, confirming its conclusion in February 2005.
The United States Army operated Forward Operating Base Danger for approximately two years.
Answer: True
Explanation: FOB Danger was in use from 2003 until November 2005, which is approximately two years (2003, 2004, part of 2005).
The 4th Infantry Division was the inaugural United States Army division to garrison the installation that later became Forward Operating Base Danger.
Answer: True
Explanation: The 4th Infantry Division garrisoned FOB Danger from March 2003 to March 2004, making it the first division to do so.
The 1st Infantry Division assumed garrison responsibilities at Forward Operating Base Danger directly from the 42nd Infantry Division.
Answer: False
Explanation: The 4th Infantry Division garrisoned FOB Danger from March 2003 to March 2004, followed by the 1st Infantry Division from March 2004 to February 2005, and then the 42nd Infantry Division from February to November 2005. Thus, the 1st ID did not take over directly from the 42nd ID.
The 4th Infantry Division's tenure at the Tikrit installation concluded with its redesignation under the 1st Infantry Division in May 2004.
Answer: True
Explanation: The 4th Infantry Division's tenure as headquarters garrison for the installation (then FOB Ironhorse) ended with its handover and redesignation under the 1st Infantry Division in May 2004.
The term 'Task Force Danger' was associated with the 1st Infantry Division's command or operational involvement with Forward Operating Base Danger.
Answer: True
Explanation: Headquarters, 1st Infantry Division, issued a press release on July 4, 2004, related to 'Task Force Danger,' indicating their command or operational involvement with the base.
Which United States Army division maintained garrison duties at Forward Operating Base Danger from March 2003 to March 2004?
Answer: 4th Infantry Division
Explanation: The 4th Infantry Division garrisoned Forward Operating Base Danger from March 2003 to March 2004.
Which United States Army division garrisoned Forward Operating Base Danger from March 2004 to February 2005?
Answer: 1st Infantry Division
Explanation: The 1st Infantry Division garrisoned Forward Operating Base Danger from March 2004 to February 2005.
Which United States Army division maintained garrison duties at Forward Operating Base Danger from February to November 2005?
Answer: 42nd Infantry Division
Explanation: The 42nd Infantry Division garrisoned Forward Operating Base Danger from February to November 2005.
The 4th Infantry Division's tenure as headquarters garrison for the Tikrit installation (then Forward Operating Base Ironhorse) concluded in May 2004 with its redesignation under which division?
Answer: 1st Infantry Division
Explanation: The 4th Infantry Division's tenure as headquarters garrison for the installation, then known as Forward Operating Base Ironhorse, ended with its handover and redesignation under the 1st Infantry Division in May 2004.
Which of the following sets of divisions accurately identifies those that garrisoned Forward Operating Base Danger at different periods?
Answer: 4th Infantry Division, 1st Infantry Division, 42nd Infantry Division
Explanation: The 4th Infantry Division, 1st Infantry Division, and 42nd Infantry Division of the United States Army garrisoned Forward Operating Base Danger at different times.
What was the operational duration of the 4th Infantry Division's presence at Forward Operating Base Danger?
Answer: March 2003 to March 2004
Explanation: The 4th Infantry Division was present at Forward Operating Base Danger from March 2003 to March 2004.
Which United States Army division maintained a presence at Forward Operating Base Danger from March 2004 to February 2005?
Answer: 1st Infantry Division
Explanation: The 1st Infantry Division was present at Forward Operating Base Danger from March 2004 to February 2005.
Approximately how many months did the 42nd Infantry Division maintain its presence at Forward Operating Base Danger?
Answer: 9 months
Explanation: The 42nd Infantry Division was present at Forward Operating Base Danger from February to November 2005, which constitutes a period of nine months.
The operational period of Forward Operating Base Danger under the United States Army extended from:
Answer: 2003-2005
Explanation: Forward Operating Base Danger was in use by the United States Army from 2003 until November 2005.
In which month and year did the 4th Infantry Division's tenure as headquarters garrison for the Tikrit installation (then Forward Operating Base Ironhorse) conclude?
Answer: May 2004
Explanation: The 4th Infantry Division's tenure as headquarters garrison for the installation, then known as Forward Operating Base Ironhorse, ended in May 2004.
Which of the following divisions was NOT explicitly mentioned as having occupied Forward Operating Base Danger?
Answer: 3rd Infantry Division
Explanation: The 4th, 1st, and 42nd Infantry Divisions are listed as having garrisoned FOB Danger. The 3rd Infantry Division is mentioned in relation to the East Baghdad FOB Iron Horse, not FOB Danger in Tikrit.
The Tikrit installation, initially designated Forward Operating Base Ironhorse, was transferred and redesignated under the 1st Infantry Division in May 2004 by which preceding division?
Answer: 4th Infantry Division
Explanation: The 4th Infantry Division's tenure as headquarters garrison for the installation, then known as Forward Operating Base Ironhorse, ended with its handover and redesignation under the 1st Infantry Division in May 2004.
Approximately how many months did the 1st Infantry Division maintain its presence at Forward Operating Base Danger?
Answer: 11 months
Explanation: The 1st Infantry Division was present at Forward Operating Base Danger from March 2004 to February 2005, which is a duration of 11 months.
In which month and year did the 4th Infantry Division's tenure as headquarters garrison for the installation (then Forward Operating Base Ironhorse) commence?
Answer: April 2003
Explanation: The 4th Infantry Division served as the headquarters garrison for the installation when it was known as Forward Operating Base Ironhorse from April 2003.
Captain Phillip Esposito and 1st Lieutenant Louis Allen were killed at FOB Danger, marking the first recorded instance of fragging among United States forces during the Iraq War.
Answer: True
Explanation: The source explicitly states that the deaths of Captain Esposito and 1st Lieutenant Allen at FOB Danger constituted the first recorded fragging incident among US forces in the Iraq War.
Fragging, as defined in the source, exclusively refers to the killing of a fellow soldier using a fragmentation grenade.
Answer: False
Explanation: The definition of fragging in the source clarifies that while a fragmentation grenade is typically associated, the term can apply to other methods of killing or attempting to kill a fellow soldier.
The incident involving Captain Esposito and 1st Lieutenant Allen transpired in 2004.
Answer: False
Explanation: The incident involving Captain Esposito and 1st Lieutenant Allen occurred on June 7, 2005, not in 2004.
The term 'fragging' specifically denotes the use of a fragmentation grenade.
Answer: False
Explanation: While fragging typically involves a fragmentation grenade, the source clarifies that the term can apply to other methods of killing or attempting to kill a fellow soldier.
The fragging incident at Forward Operating Base Danger involved officers from the 1st Infantry Division.
Answer: False
Explanation: The officers involved in the fragging incident, Captain Phillip Esposito and 1st Lieutenant Louis Allen, were from the 42nd Infantry Division, not the 1st Infantry Division.
On what specific date did Captain Phillip Esposito and 1st Lieutenant Louis Allen of the 42nd Infantry Division perish at Forward Operating Base Danger?
Answer: June 7, 2005
Explanation: Captain Phillip Esposito and 1st Lieutenant Louis Allen were killed at Forward Operating Base Danger on June 7, 2005.
The fragging incident at Forward Operating Base Danger on June 7, 2005, involved officers from which United States Army division?
Answer: 42nd Infantry Division
Explanation: Captain Phillip Esposito and 1st Lieutenant Louis Allen, who were killed in the fragging incident, were from the 42nd Infantry Division.
Captain Phillip Esposito and 1st Lieutenant Louis Allen were officers affiliated with which United States Army division?
Answer: 42nd Infantry Division
Explanation: Captain Phillip Esposito and 1st Lieutenant Louis Allen were officers from the 42nd Infantry Division.
Forward Operating Base Ironhorse, located in East Baghdad, was subsequently redesignated as FOB Danger.
Answer: False
Explanation: The Forward Operating Base Ironhorse in East Baghdad was renamed FOB Patriot and then FOB Loyalty. Forward Operating Base Danger was a separate installation in Tikrit, initially named FOB Ironhorse (Tikrit).
The 1st Brigade of the 1st Cavalry Division commenced operations at the Forward Operating Base Iron Horse situated in East Baghdad.
Answer: True
Explanation: The source explicitly states that the 1st Cavalry Division's 1st Brigade began its operations at FOB Iron Horse in East Baghdad.
The 3rd Infantry Division arrived at the East Baghdad Forward Operating Base Iron Horse in December 2004/January 2005.
Answer: True
Explanation: The source indicates that the 3rd Infantry Division arrived at the East Baghdad FOB Iron Horse in December/January 2005.
Forward Operating Base Loyalty was a subsequent designation for the Forward Operating Base situated in Tikrit.
Answer: False
Explanation: FOB Loyalty was a subsequent name for the FOB Ironhorse located in East Baghdad, not the FOB in Tikrit (FOB Danger).
Which of the following Forward Operating Bases was situated in East Baghdad and contained a prison facility?
Answer: Forward Operating Base Ironhorse (East Baghdad)
Explanation: The source indicates that Forward Operating Base Ironhorse in East Baghdad housed a prison.
What was the principal geographical differentiation between Forward Operating Base Danger and the Forward Operating Bases such as Iron Horse, Patriot, and Loyalty?
Answer: FOB Danger was in the North (Tikrit), while others were in East Baghdad.
Explanation: FOB Danger was located in Tikrit, Northern Iraq, while other FOBs like Iron Horse, Patriot, and Loyalty were situated in East Baghdad.
At which specific Forward Operating Base location did the 1st Brigade of the 1st Cavalry Division commence its operations?
Answer: FOB Iron Horse in East Baghdad
Explanation: The 1st Cavalry Division's 1st Brigade started at FOB Iron Horse, which was located in East Baghdad.
The Forward Operating Base Ironhorse, which was subsequently redesignated as FOB Patriot and then FOB Loyalty, was situated in:
Answer: East Baghdad
Explanation: The Forward Operating Base Ironhorse that was renamed FOB Patriot and FOB Loyalty was located in East Baghdad.
When did the 3rd Infantry Division arrive at the East Baghdad Forward Operating Base Iron Horse?
Answer: December/January 2005
Explanation: The 3rd Infantry Division arrived at the East Baghdad FOB Iron Horse in December 2004/January 2005.
Which of the following served as a subsequent designation for the Forward Operating Base Ironhorse situated in East Baghdad?
Answer: Forward Operating Base Patriot
Explanation: The Forward Operating Base Ironhorse in East Baghdad was renamed FOB Patriot and then subsequently FOB Loyalty.
Which of the following was NOT a designation for the East Baghdad Forward Operating Base that originated as Iron Horse?
Answer: FOB Danger
Explanation: The East Baghdad FOB Iron Horse was renamed FOB Patriot and then FOB Loyalty. FOB Danger was a separate installation in Tikrit.
Forward Operating Base Danger was transferred to the government of Iraq in February 2005.
Answer: False
Explanation: Forward Operating Base Danger was handed over to the government of Iraq in November 2005, not February 2005.
The transfer of Forward Operating Base Danger to the Iraqi government coincided with the conclusion of the 42nd Infantry Division's tenure.
Answer: True
Explanation: The 42nd Infantry Division's tenure ended in November 2005, which is also when FOB Danger was handed over to the Iraqi government.
The transfer of Forward Operating Base Danger to the Iraqi government marked the commencement of its operation by the United States Army.
Answer: False
Explanation: The handover of FOB Danger to the Iraqi government in November 2005 marked the *end* of its operation by the United States Army, not the beginning.
In which month and year did the transfer of Forward Operating Base Danger to the government of Iraq take place?
Answer: November 2005
Explanation: Forward Operating Base Danger was handed over to the government of Iraq in November 2005.
The transfer of Forward Operating Base Danger to the Iraqi government in November 2005 signified what important event?
Answer: The end of its operation by the United States Army.
Explanation: The handover of Forward Operating Base Danger to the government of Iraq in November 2005 marked the end of its operation by the United States Army.