Explanation: The status of a free tenant was characterized by being a tenant farmer who rented or leased land, rather than owning it outright. Their distinct position within the social hierarchy was marked by specific rights and obligations, including relatively low rents paid to their manorial lord.

Explanation: Free tenants possessed the personal freedom to marry without requiring the permission of their manorial lord, a liberty generally not afforded to villeins.

Explanation: Unlike villeins who were bound to the land, free tenants could not be forcibly relocated from one estate to another by their manorial lord, indicating a greater degree of personal liberty.

Explanation: The provided short description identifies a 'Free tenant' as a 'Class of peasant in medieval England,' not as a clergyman.

Explanation: The term 'land-owning peasantry' implies precisely the opposite: peasants who possessed ownership rights over the land they cultivated, distinguishing them from those who merely rented or were tied to the land.

Explanation: While free tenants had more liberty than villeins, their movement could still be subject to certain obligations or restrictions related to their tenancy; they could not be forcibly relocated against their will, but 'without restriction' is an overstatement.

Explanation: The primary characteristic distinguishing a free tenant was the relatively low rents they paid to their manorial lord, which signified their unique position within the social hierarchy.

Explanation: A significant personal freedom enjoyed by free tenants, but typically denied to villeins, was the ability to marry without requiring the permission of their manorial lord.

Explanation: The term 'tenant farmer' implies that a free tenant leased or rented the land from a landowner, typically a manorial lord, rather than owning it outright.

Explanation: The term 'land-owning peasantry' signifies a group that possessed ownership rights over the land they cultivated, indicating a degree of economic independence and social standing.

Explanation: The description 'Class of peasant in medieval England' serves to provide a concise identification of the subject's role and historical context within the broader social structure.

Explanation: Free tenants generally had the liberty to marry individuals from other manors without requiring their lord's consent, a freedom typically not extended to villeins.

Explanation: This statement is inaccurate. Free tenants were distinguished by paying relatively low rents to their manorial lords, a key aspect of their status that contrasted with the obligations of unfree peasants.

Explanation: This assertion is incorrect. Villeins were unfree peasants bound more strictly to the land and the lord's will, possessing less personal autonomy and more legal ties than free tenants, who enjoyed greater freedom and fewer obligations.

Explanation: This description is incorrect. A 'villein' was an unfree peasant bound to the land and subject to the manorial lord's authority and obligations, possessing significantly fewer freedoms than a free tenant.

Explanation: The term 'yoke of servitude' is a metaphor representing the oppressive burden and lack of freedom associated with an unfree status, not a literal description of tools used by serfs.

Explanation: Free tenants generally possessed fewer legal ties and greater personal autonomy compared to villeins, who were unfree peasants bound more strictly to the land and the lord's will.

Explanation: A villein was an unfree peasant bound to the land and subject to the manorial lord's authority, possessing significantly fewer personal freedoms and legal rights than a free tenant.

Explanation: The metaphor 'yoke of servitude' symbolizes the oppressive burden, constraints, and lack of personal freedom experienced by those in an unfree status, such as serfs or villeins.

Explanation: A free tenant generally possessed significantly more personal autonomy and fewer obligations compared to a serf, who was bound to the land and subject to the lord's authority.

Explanation: In the context of medieval social status, 'servitude' implies the condition of being subject to a master or owner, characterized by a lack of personal freedom and autonomy.

Explanation: A key difference was that free tenants could not be forcibly relocated by their lord, whereas villeins were bound to the land and lacked this freedom of movement.

Explanation: A key difference in personal freedoms was that free tenants could marry without their lord's permission, a liberty generally not afforded to villeins.

Explanation: Ranulf de Glanvill's treatise suggests that proving freedom in the late 12th century primarily involved demonstrating descent from free relatives recognized in court, rather than presenting evidence of land ownership.

Explanation: Demonstrating descent from free ancestors was a crucial element in establishing a claim to freedom during the Middle Ages, as evidenced by legal scholarship of the period.

Explanation: Kinship in medieval legal contexts encompassed relationships through both blood (consanguinity) and marriage (affinity), and was crucial for establishing inheritance, succession, and social status.

Explanation: Ranulf de Glanvill's legal treatise indicated that proving freedom primarily involved demonstrating kinship with free relatives who were recognized by the court, rather than through land ownership or oaths.

Explanation: Proving kinship was vital in medieval legal contexts for establishing rights related to inheritance, succession, and determining an individual's social and legal status.

Explanation: Ranulf de Glanvill is significant for authoring 'Tractatus de legibus et consuetudinibus regni Angliae,' one of the earliest systematic treatises on English common law, providing crucial insights into medieval legal practices.

Explanation: In the Kingdom of France, free peasants constituted the "third estate" and were distinct from the nobility. The term 'free peasant' did not encompass members of the noble class.

Explanation: A universal definition of 'free peasant' did not exist across all medieval regions. The varied nature of manorial holdings and diverse local laws led to significant regional differences in the status and rights associated with free peasants.

Explanation: The types of taxes and legal obligations an individual was subject to were significant factors in determining their social status as free or unfree in medieval society.

Explanation: Paying 'merchet' was generally considered a sign of unfree or servile status, as it was a tax paid upon the marriage of a daughter, signifying the lord's control over unfree peasants.

Explanation: A 'manorial lord' was a landowner who held authority over a manor, typically possessing land and exercising rights over tenants, rather than being a peasant farmer renting land.

Explanation: Merchet was not a tax paid by free tenants for moving; it was a fee or fine paid by unfree peasants, typically upon the marriage of a daughter, signifying the lord's control over servile individuals.

Explanation: The feudal hierarchy was a complex system based on land tenure, reciprocal obligations, and loyalty, encompassing social, economic, and political structures, not solely determined by military prowess.

Explanation: The 'disparate nature' of manorial holdings signifies that they varied considerably in size, resources, and customs, rather than being identical.

Explanation: Local laws in medieval times varied significantly across regions and manors within the Kingdom of France, rather than being uniform throughout the entire realm.

Explanation: In historical French society, the 'third estate' comprised the commoners—including peasants, workers, and the bourgeoisie—and excluded the clergy (first estate) and the nobility (second estate).

Explanation: Legal privileges were not equally available to all individuals in feudal society; they were specific rights and immunities granted to certain groups based on social rank, status, or position.

Explanation: Feudal society was fundamentally hierarchical and characterized by reciprocal obligations between lords and vassals, not by democratic principles or equal rights for all individuals.

Explanation: The Danelaw region was historically characterized by the laws and customs of the Danes and Norsemen, not by Norman French legal customs.

Explanation: Kent possessed distinct local legal customs, such as gavelkind, which differed significantly from the legal traditions prevalent in the Danelaw region.

Explanation: Manorial holdings refer to the lands and properties constituting a manor, managed under the lord's authority, not solely the lord's personal movable property.

Explanation: In the Kingdom of France, free peasants were typically part of the "third estate," characterized as a land-owning, non-political segment of the population, distinct from the clergy and nobility.

Explanation: The definition and status of free peasants varied significantly across medieval regions due to the disparate nature of manorial holdings and the diversity of local laws and customs.

Explanation: A 'manorial lord' was fundamentally a landowner who held authority over a manor, exercising rights and responsibilities related to the land and its inhabitants.

Explanation: The 'disparate nature' of manorial holdings signifies that they differed considerably in their size, resources, and the customs governing them, leading to variations in the lives of those who worked them.

Explanation: 'Local laws' referred to the specific customs, rules, and regulations that governed individual manors or regions, often supplementing broader legal frameworks and contributing to regional diversity.

Explanation: Historically, the 'third estate' in France referred to the common people, encompassing the vast majority of the population, including peasants, urban workers, and the bourgeoisie, distinct from the clergy and nobility.

Explanation: The Danelaw region is historically significant for being the area in England where the laws and customs of the Danes and Norsemen were predominant following Viking settlement.

Explanation: Manorial holdings refer to the collective lands and properties that comprised a manor, managed under the authority of the manorial lord.

Explanation: The status of a free tenant could differ between regions like Kent and the Danelaw due to Kent's distinct local laws and customs (e.g., gavelkind), which contrasted with the legal traditions of other areas.

Explanation: The 'feudal hierarchy' represents the structured social, economic, and political system of medieval Europe, organized around land tenure, reciprocal obligations, and loyalty.

Explanation: The term 'manorial lord' signifies a landowner who held authority and jurisdiction over a manor, encompassing its lands and inhabitants.

Explanation: Historically, the term 'third estate' in France referred to the common people, encompassing peasants, workers, and the bourgeoisie, distinguishing them from the clergy and nobility.

Explanation: The term 'feudal hierarchy' implies that medieval society was structured with distinct levels of rank and obligation, based on land tenure and reciprocal relationships.

Explanation: The classification of 'Free tenant' within lists of feudal titles confirms its recognized position within the medieval social hierarchy, indicating a distinct status above unfree laborers.

Explanation: Contrary to this statement, the feudal hierarchy lists typically position 'Free tenant' above categories such as 'Serf' and 'Villein,' reflecting a higher social and legal standing.

Explanation: Within the typical feudal hierarchy lists, the 'Villein' is generally positioned directly below the 'Free tenant,' indicating a lower social and legal standing.

Explanation: In scholarly contexts, a 'treatise' denotes a formal, systematic, and comprehensive written work that thoroughly discusses a particular subject, aiming for detailed analysis.

Explanation: The inclusion of 'Free tenant' in lists of feudal titles signifies its recognized position within the established social hierarchy, typically above unfree peasant categories.

Explanation: This assertion is inaccurate. A 'More citations needed' template indicates that the article requires additional references from reliable sources to substantiate its claims, underscoring the need for further verification rather than signifying completeness.

Explanation: This is incorrect. The 'External links' section is intended to provide references to relevant websites and resources that exist outside the primary publication or platform, offering supplementary information and diverse perspectives.

Explanation: This assertion is erroneous. A 'stub' notice indicates that an article is incomplete or underdeveloped and could benefit from expansion, rather than suggesting it is overly detailed and requires summarization.

Explanation: A 'stub' notice indicates that an article is considered incomplete or underdeveloped and could benefit from further expansion with additional details or sources.