Explanation: The assertion that 'Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows – Part 2' is the seventh film in the series is inaccurate. It represents the eighth and final installment of the film adaptation of J. K. Rowling's Harry Potter novels.

Explanation: The film's duration is precisely 130 minutes, which equates to 2 hours and 10 minutes, as stated in the provided information.

Explanation: The film that serves as the conclusion to the Harry Potter film series is officially titled 'Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows – Part 2'.

Explanation: The film's duration is precisely 130 minutes, which equates to 2 hours and 10 minutes, as stated in the provided information.

Explanation: The screenplay for 'Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows – Part 2' was adapted by Steve Kloves, not J. K. Rowling, who authored the original novel.

Explanation: Philip Womack's interpretation suggested that the film's ultimate message centered on the idea that 'there is darkness in all of us, but we can overcome it,' resonating with viewers through this theme of internal struggle and resilience.

Explanation: The cinematic adaptation 'Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows – Part 2' is based upon the 2007 novel of the same title, authored by J. K. Rowling.

Explanation: The central narrative thrust of the film follows Harry Potter's definitive quest to locate and annihilate Lord Voldemort's remaining Horcruxes, thereby enabling his ultimate defeat.

Explanation: Philip Womack posited that the film conveyed a profound message concerning the internal struggle against darkness, suggesting that 'there is darkness in all of us, but we can overcome it.'

Explanation: While David Yates directed 'Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows – Part 2,' he did not direct all films in the series. His tenure as director began with 'Harry Potter and the Order of the Phoenix' and continued through the final two installments.

Explanation: Daniel Radcliffe, Rupert Grint, and Emma Watson indeed reprised their iconic roles as Harry Potter, Ron Weasley, and Hermione Granger, respectively, for the concluding film.

Explanation: The assertion that principal photography concluded in early 2009 is incorrect. Filming commenced in February 2009 and concluded on June 12, 2010, with additional reshoots taking place later that year.

Explanation: Production designer Stuart Craig's description of the Gringotts Wizarding Bank set was quite the opposite of small and understated. He characterized it as grand, solid, and marble-clad, emphasizing its imposing scale and opulence.

Explanation: The depiction of Hogwarts' destruction was identified as a significant challenge in production design, not a minor one. The complexity involved creating realistic devastation, including ruined walls and the Great Hall's damaged roof.

Explanation: David Yates helmed the directorial duties for 'Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows – Part 2'.

Explanation: Production designer Stuart Craig envisioned the Gringotts Wizarding Bank set as a monumental space, characterized by a marble banking hall featuring expansive columns. Its scale, weight, and luminosity were exaggerated to project an image of grandeur and impregnability. The vaults were furnished with thousands of vacuum-metallized gold and silver pieces, and a dynamic floor mechanism simulated the accumulation of vast wealth.

Explanation: The principal challenge faced by the production design team was the realistic portrayal of the castle's destruction during the climactic Battle of Hogwarts. This encompassed rendering extensive wall damage, the ruined roof of the Great Hall, and the pervasive devastation across the entire structure.

Explanation: The musical score for 'Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows – Part 2' was ultimately composed by Alexandre Desplat, who had previously scored 'Part 1' of the adaptation.

Explanation: The combined production budget allocated for both 'Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows – Part 1' and 'Part 2' was $250 million.

Explanation: This statement is accurate. 'Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows – Part 2' holds the distinction of being the sole film within the Harry Potter series to be released in the 3D format.

Explanation: Contrary to the statement, visual effects supervisors regarded the 3D conversion of the film as exceptionally well-executed, particularly given the extensive use of CGI and the complexity of the conversion process.

Explanation: This statement is inaccurate. Alexandre Desplat, who composed the score for 'Part 1,' did indeed return to score 'Part 2.' The scheduling conflicts mentioned were related to John Williams's potential involvement, not Desplat's.

Explanation: Alexandre Desplat indicated that the musical themes established by John Williams would feature with increased prominence in 'Part 2' compared to their presence in 'Part 1'.

Explanation: Mark Kermode's critique of 'Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows – Part 2' included criticism of its post-converted 3D presentation, despite acknowledging the film's overall ambition and solid adaptation.

Explanation: The film achieved significant commercial success, with its total worldwide gross surpassing the $1.3 billion mark.

Explanation: The marketing tagline 'It All Ends 7.15' did not refer to the production start date; rather, it indicated the film's international release date of July 15th.

Explanation: This statement is accurate. 'Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows – Part 2' was indeed the first film in the series to be assigned a 12A certificate by the BBFC, and it notably carried a warning for injury detail, a distinction unique among the franchise's installments.

Explanation: The film's release on home media was met with significant consumer demand, evidenced by record-breaking pre-order sales on platforms such as Amazon.

Explanation: Roger Ebert's review offered praise for the film, awarding it three and a half stars. He described the finale as conjuring 'enough awe and solemnity to serve as an appropriate and dramatic conclusion to the series,' rather than finding it underwhelming.

Explanation: The film established a worldwide IMAX opening-weekend record, grossing $23.2 million, surpassing the $20 million threshold mentioned.

Explanation: The film achieved the $1 billion milestone in worldwide earnings in just 19 days, tying a record previously held by 'Avatar.'

Explanation: The assertion that over half of the US opening weekend gross came from 3D showings is inaccurate. Approximately 43% of the opening weekend revenue originated from 3D venues.

Explanation: The critical consensus, as indicated by sources such as Rotten Tomatoes, was largely positive, describing the film as a satisfying and magical conclusion to the saga, contrary to the notion of widespread disappointment.

Explanation: 'Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows – Part 2' achieved the status of the highest-grossing film worldwide in the year of its release, 2011.

Explanation: During its opening weekend in the United States, approximately 43% of the total gross revenue was generated from 3D showings.