Enter a player name to begin or load your saved progress.
The Howard government served continuously from March 1996 until December 2007.
Answer: True
Explanation: The Howard government, led by Prime Minister John Howard, governed Australia for over eleven years, commencing on 11 March 1996 and concluding on 3 December 2007.
John Howard's government was solely composed of the Liberal Party, without coalition partners.
Answer: False
Explanation: The Howard government was formed by the Liberal-National Coalition, comprising the Liberal Party of Australia and the National Party of Australia. This coalition structure was fundamental to its governance.
Peter Costello served as Treasurer, and Alexander Downer as Minister for Foreign Affairs, for the entirety of the Howard government's time in office.
Answer: True
Explanation: Peter Costello served as Treasurer, and Alexander Downer served as Minister for Foreign Affairs, holding these senior cabinet positions for the entire duration of the Howard government's time in office. Their consistent roles provided stability in key economic and foreign policy portfolios.
The Howard government held a majority in the Australian Senate for its entire period in office.
Answer: False
Explanation: The Howard government did not hold a majority in the Australian Senate for its first three terms, requiring negotiation with other parties. A Senate majority was achieved only in the final months of its fourth term following the 2004 election.
Which two political parties formed the Liberal-National Coalition that constituted the Howard government?
Answer: The Liberal Party of Australia and the National Party of Australia
Explanation: The governing coalition was formed by the Liberal Party of Australia and the National Party of Australia, a long-standing political alliance in Australian federal politics.
Who served as Treasurer throughout John Howard's entire prime ministership?
Answer: Peter Costello
Explanation: Peter Costello held the position of Treasurer for the entirety of John Howard's tenure as Prime Minister, providing continuity in economic management.
For how long did the Howard government *not* hold a majority in the Australian Senate?
Answer: For its first three terms, until the 2004 election.
Explanation: The Howard government did not command a majority in the Australian Senate for its initial three terms, necessitating negotiation with other parties. A Senate majority was achieved only in the final months of its fourth term following the 2004 election.
The introduction of a Goods and Services Tax (GST) was a central policy of the Howard government.
Answer: True
Explanation: The implementation of a Goods and Services Tax (GST) was a significant and defining economic policy initiative of the Howard government, introduced on 1 July 2000.
The Howard government inherited a budget surplus and focused on increasing spending.
Answer: False
Explanation: Contrary to the assertion, the Howard government claimed to have inherited a substantial budget deficit and subsequently implemented significant spending cuts to achieve fiscal consolidation, rather than increasing spending.
The introduction of the 10% GST on 1 July 2000 faced minimal public opposition.
Answer: False
Explanation: The introduction of the 10% GST on 1 July 2000 encountered considerable public opposition and significant lobbying efforts for exemptions, despite its eventual passage through Parliament.
The Howard government achieved full repayment of the Commonwealth's net debt during its term.
Answer: True
Explanation: A significant fiscal achievement of the Howard government was the complete repayment of the Commonwealth's net debt, which stood at $96 billion upon their election in 1996.
How did the Howard government address the budget deficit it claimed to inherit?
Answer: By implementing significant spending cuts and calling some promises 'non-core'.
Explanation: The Howard government addressed the claimed budget deficit through substantial spending cuts across government departments and by designating certain election promises as 'non-core' to achieve fiscal consolidation.
What measure was taken to appease the Australian Democrats and secure passage of the GST legislation in the Senate?
Answer: Exempting basic food items from the GST.
Explanation: To secure the passage of the GST legislation through the Senate, concessions were made to the Australian Democrats, notably the exemption of basic food items from the tax.
Which of the following was a key economic achievement of the Howard government?
Answer: Creating over 855,000 new jobs and repaying net debt.
Explanation: Key economic achievements during the Howard government's tenure included the creation of over 855,000 new jobs and the complete repayment of the Commonwealth's net debt.
The Howard government pursued the partial privatization of which major telecommunications company?
Answer: Telstra
Explanation: The Howard government engaged in the partial privatization of Telstra, Australia's primary telecommunications company, as part of its broader economic reform agenda.
The 'Pacific Solution' involved processing asylum seekers on Australian territory.
Answer: False
Explanation: The 'Pacific Solution' policy involved processing asylum seekers in offshore facilities, primarily on Nauru and Manus Island, rather than on Australian territory, as a measure to deter unauthorized boat arrivals.
The September 11, 2001 attacks led Australia to withdraw from international military commitments.
Answer: False
Explanation: In response to the September 11, 2001 attacks, Australia, under the Howard government, increased its international military commitments, notably deploying troops to Afghanistan and later Iraq, as part of the global 'War on Terror'.
Australia's deployment to the Iraq War in 2003 was met with widespread bipartisan support.
Answer: False
Explanation: Australia's deployment to the Iraq War in 2003 was a contentious issue, facing significant opposition from political parties and segments of the public, rather than widespread bipartisan support.
The MV Tampa incident significantly harmed John Howard's popularity and contributed to his election loss in 2001.
Answer: False
Explanation: The MV Tampa incident, and the government's firm response to it, is widely considered to have significantly boosted John Howard's popularity and contributed to his electoral victory in 2001, rather than causing his loss.
John Howard's immigration policy was characterized by a focus solely on reducing overall immigration numbers.
Answer: False
Explanation: John Howard's immigration policy was characterized by a dual approach: appearing tough on illegal immigration while maintaining high levels of legal immigration, a strategy described by some as 'tricky'.
Australia played a minor role in the UN peacekeeping force deployed to East Timor in 1999.
Answer: False
Explanation: Australia played a leading role in the UN peacekeeping force (INTERFET) deployed to East Timor in September 1999, demonstrating significant regional engagement.
Australia ratified the Kyoto Protocol early in John Howard's prime ministership.
Answer: False
Explanation: Australia did not ratify the Kyoto Protocol during the Howard government's tenure. The government cited concerns regarding its economic impact and effectiveness without broader international participation.
The 'Pacific Solution' policy aimed to address asylum seeker arrivals by:
Answer: Processing asylum claims in offshore facilities like Nauru and Manus Island.
Explanation: The 'Pacific Solution' policy involved processing asylum seeker claims in offshore detention centers, such as those on Nauru and Manus Island, to deter unauthorized maritime arrivals.
Following the September 11, 2001 attacks, Australia committed troops to which two major international conflicts under the Howard government?
Answer: Afghanistan and Iraq
Explanation: In the aftermath of the September 11, 2001 attacks, the Howard government committed Australian forces to military operations in both Afghanistan and Iraq as part of the global 'War on Terror'.
The government's handling of which incident significantly boosted John Howard's popularity and is considered a factor in his 2001 election victory?
Answer: The MV Tampa incident
Explanation: The government's decisive handling of the MV Tampa incident in 2001, concerning asylum seekers, is widely regarded as having significantly enhanced John Howard's public standing and contributed to his electoral success in that year.
According to economist Ross Gittins, John Howard's immigration policy was described as 'tricky' because it:
Answer: Appeared tough on illegal immigration while promoting high legal immigration.
Explanation: Economist Ross Gittins characterized John Howard's immigration policy as 'tricky' due to its apparent duality: projecting a strong stance against illegal immigration while simultaneously facilitating high levels of legal immigration.
What role did Australia play in the UN peacekeeping force deployed to East Timor in September 1999?
Answer: Australia led the UN peacekeeping force (INTERFET).
Explanation: Australia assumed a leading role in the UN peacekeeping force, known as INTERFET (International Force East Timor), deployed to the region in September 1999.
Why did the Howard government choose not to ratify the Kyoto Protocol?
Answer: It argued the protocol would harm Australia's coal industry and competitive advantage without significant global impact due to non-participation by major emitters.
Explanation: The Howard government declined to ratify the Kyoto Protocol, asserting that it would disadvantage Australia's industries, particularly the coal sector, without achieving substantial global emissions reductions due to the non-participation of key emitters like the United States and major developing nations.
The 'Children Overboard Affair' involved allegations related to the government's handling of:
Answer: Asylum seekers throwing children into the water to force rescue.
Explanation: The 'Children Overboard Affair' concerned allegations that the government had misrepresented or fabricated claims regarding asylum seekers throwing children overboard to compel rescue, highlighting controversies surrounding its asylum seeker policies.
John Howard's foreign policy approach was summarized as 'Asia first, not Asia only,' indicating a strategy to:
Answer: Deepen engagement with Asia while maintaining traditional ties with allies like the US.
Explanation: The foreign policy doctrine of 'Asia first, not Asia only' signified a strategic intent to enhance Australia's engagement with Asian nations while concurrently preserving its established alliances, particularly with the United States.
The Howard government's anti-terrorism legislation introduced in 2005 included modifications to which area of law?
Answer: Sedition laws
Explanation: The anti-terrorism legislation enacted by the Howard government in 2005 included amendments to sedition laws, among other measures aimed at enhancing national security.
No questions available for this topic.
John Howard became Leader of the Opposition for the second time on 30 January 1995.
Answer: True
Explanation: John Howard assumed the leadership of the Opposition for the second time on 30 January 1995, following his earlier tenure as Opposition Leader from 1985 to 1989.
The 'Fightback!' policy, central to the 1993 election, was primarily focused on environmental protection.
Answer: False
Explanation: The 'Fightback!' policy, proposed by the Liberal Party for the 1993 election, was primarily an economic reform package centered on the introduction of a Goods and Services Tax (GST), not environmental protection.
The 1998 Australian Constitutional Convention decided to hold a referendum on becoming a republic.
Answer: True
Explanation: The 1998 Australian Constitutional Convention recommended holding a referendum on the question of Australia becoming a republic, with a proposed model for a president appointed by Parliament.
John Howard argued in favor of Australia becoming a republic during the 1998 Constitutional Convention.
Answer: False
Explanation: During the 1998 Constitutional Convention, Prime Minister John Howard argued in favor of retaining the constitutional monarchy, emphasizing its stability, while Treasurer Peter Costello supported the republican model.
The 1999 referendum on Australia becoming a republic was approved by a majority of voters.
Answer: False
Explanation: The 1999 referendum on Australia becoming a republic failed to gain majority support. A significant majority of voters, and all states, voted against the proposal.
John Howard retained his own seat of Bennelong in the 2007 federal election.
Answer: False
Explanation: In the federal election of 2007, which resulted in the defeat of the Howard government, John Howard lost his own seat of Bennelong.
What was the central component of the Liberal Party's 'Fightback!' policy for the 1993 federal election?
Answer: The introduction of a Goods and Services Tax (GST)
Explanation: The 'Fightback!' policy, presented by the Liberal Party for the 1993 federal election, centered on the introduction of a Goods and Services Tax (GST) as its primary economic reform proposal.
What was the outcome of the 1999 referendum concerning Australia becoming a republic?
Answer: It failed, with 55% voting 'no'.
Explanation: The 1999 referendum on Australia becoming a republic did not pass, with approximately 55% of voters choosing 'no' and all states voting against the proposal.
What was a key factor contributing to the Howard government's defeat in the 2007 federal election?
Answer: Public opposition to the 'WorkChoices' policy.
Explanation: Significant public opposition to the 'WorkChoices' industrial relations policy emerged as a critical factor contributing to the Howard government's electoral defeat in 2007.
What was the outcome of the 2004 federal election regarding the Coalition's control of the Senate?
Answer: The Coalition gained a majority in the Senate for the first time since 1981.
Explanation: The 2004 federal election resulted in the Coalition securing a majority in the Australian Senate, a position it had not held since 1981, thereby enhancing its legislative capacity.
Social and Industrial Relations
The Port Arthur massacre occurred shortly after the Howard government took office in 1996.
Answer: True
Explanation: The tragic Port Arthur massacre occurred on 28 April 1996, just eight weeks after the Howard government was sworn into office, prompting immediate and significant legislative action on gun control.
The *National Firearms Program Implementation Act 1996* significantly restricted the ownership of certain types of firearms.
Answer: True
Explanation: The *National Firearms Program Implementation Act 1996* enacted stringent restrictions on the ownership of specific firearms, including semi-automatic and pump-action models, following the Port Arthur massacre.
The *Workplace Relations Act 1996* was the only significant industrial relations reform undertaken by the Howard government.
Answer: False
Explanation: The Howard government undertook multiple significant industrial relations reforms, including the *Workplace Relations Act 1996* and the later, more controversial, 'WorkChoices' policy.
During the 1998 waterfront dispute, the government supported the replacement of unionized workers with non-union labor.
Answer: True
Explanation: During the 1998 Australian waterfront dispute, the Howard government supported Patrick Corporation's strategy of replacing its unionized workforce with non-union labor, utilizing legislative measures to facilitate this change.
The *Native Title Amendment Act 1998* strengthened native title rights following the Wik decision.
Answer: False
Explanation: The *Native Title Amendment Act 1998* weakened native title rights by allowing for the extinguishment of native title on pastoral leases, contrary to the High Court's Wik decision which recognized coexistence.
The Howard government issued a national apology to Indigenous Australians for past injustices, as recommended by the *Bringing Them Home Report*.
Answer: False
Explanation: While the Howard government accepted most recommendations from the *Bringing Them Home Report*, it notably declined to issue a formal national apology from Parliament to the Stolen Generations, stating that the current generation should not accept responsibility for past actions.
The Howard government amended laws to allow same-sex couples to inherit superannuation but did not change the definition of marriage.
Answer: True
Explanation: In 2004, the Howard government enacted legislation permitting same-sex couples to inherit private sector superannuation benefits, while concurrently passing legislation that defined marriage exclusively as the union of a man and a woman.
The 'Northern Territory National Emergency Response' (NTER) focused primarily on economic development in Indigenous communities.
Answer: False
Explanation: The 'Northern Territory National Emergency Response' (NTER), often referred to as 'The Intervention,' was primarily aimed at addressing issues of child abuse and disadvantage in Indigenous communities, rather than economic development.
The 'Work for the Dole' scheme was introduced during the Howard government's first term.
Answer: True
Explanation: The 'Work for the Dole' scheme, a program requiring eligible job seekers to participate in work-like activities, was enacted during the Howard government's first term, following its initial proposal.
What significant event, occurring just eight weeks into the government's term, prompted major gun control reforms?
Answer: The Port Arthur massacre
Explanation: The Port Arthur massacre, which occurred on 28 April 1996, just eight weeks after the government took office, was the catalyst for the Howard government's significant gun control reforms.
Which piece of legislation, enacted in 2005, significantly deregulated the Australian employment market under the Howard government?
Answer: The 'WorkChoices' policy
Explanation: The 'WorkChoices' policy, enacted in 2005, represented a significant deregulation of the Australian employment market, introducing Australian Workplace Agreements (AWAs) and altering conditions of employment.
What was the Howard government's strategy during the 1998 Australian waterfront dispute?
Answer: To support Patrick Corporation in replacing its unionized workforce with non-union labor.
Explanation: During the 1998 Australian waterfront dispute, the Howard government supported Patrick Corporation's strategy of replacing its unionized workforce with non-union labor, utilizing legislative measures to facilitate this change.
What key recommendation from the *Bringing Them Home Report* did the Howard government decline to implement?
Answer: A national apology from Parliament to the Stolen Generations.
Explanation: While accepting most recommendations from the *Bringing Them Home Report*, the Howard government declined to issue a formal national apology from Parliament to the Stolen Generations, stating that the current generation should not accept responsibility for past actions.
In 2004, the Howard government amended superannuation law concerning same-sex couples to allow:
Answer: Inheritance of private sector superannuation by partners.
Explanation: In 2004, the Howard government amended superannuation legislation to permit same-sex couples to inherit private sector superannuation benefits, although this did not extend to government schemes or alter the definition of marriage.
The 'Northern Territory National Emergency Response' (NTER), announced in 2007, was primarily aimed at addressing:
Answer: Child abuse and disadvantage in Indigenous communities.
Explanation: The 'Northern Territory National Emergency Response' (NTER), initiated in 2007, was primarily designed to address critical issues of child abuse and disadvantage within Indigenous communities in the Northern Territory.
What controversial industrial relations policy, implemented in 2006, faced significant opposition and contributed to the Coalition's defeat in 2007?
Answer: The 'WorkChoices' policy
Explanation: The 'WorkChoices' policy, implemented in 2006, significantly deregulated industrial relations and faced substantial opposition from unions and the public, becoming a key factor in the Coalition's defeat in the 2007 federal election.
What was the government's stance on a formal national apology to Indigenous Australians for past injustices?
Answer: It opposed a formal apology, believing the current generation shouldn't accept responsibility for past actions.
Explanation: The Howard government maintained opposition to a formal national apology from Parliament to Indigenous Australians for past injustices, arguing that the contemporary generation should not bear responsibility for historical actions.