Enter a player name to begin or load your saved progress.
Ietsism is a belief system centered on a precisely defined, personal God who actively intervenes in human affairs.
Answer: False
Explanation: Ietsism is characterized by belief in an unspecified transcendent reality, rather than a precisely defined, personal God who actively intervenes in human affairs.
The core characteristic of Ietsism is the affirmation of a specific, named deity with defined attributes.
Answer: False
Explanation: The core characteristic of Ietsism is the affirmation of an unspecified transcendent reality, not a specific, named deity with defined attributes.
Ietsism affirms 'something' or an undefined transcendent reality without specifying its nature.
Answer: True
Explanation: The fundamental tenet of Ietsism is the belief in an unspecified 'something' or an undefined transcendent reality, without defining its specific nature or characteristics.
All individuals identifying as ietsists share the exact same beliefs about the nature of the transcendent reality.
Answer: False
Explanation: While all ietsists affirm an unspecified transcendent reality, their individual beliefs about its precise nature are diverse and not uniform.
Ietsists exclusively draw their beliefs from scientific materialism and empirical evidence.
Answer: False
Explanation: Ietsists do not exclusively draw beliefs from scientific materialism; their beliefs are characterized by an unspecified transcendent reality, which may or may not incorporate elements beyond empirical evidence.
In Ietsism, the concept of an 'end-in-itself' refers to a belief in something with intrinsic value, but its nature is not specified.
Answer: True
Explanation: Within Ietsism, an 'end-in-itself' signifies a belief in something possessing intrinsic value or purpose, with the crucial caveat that its specific nature remains undefined.
The transcendent reality believed in by ietsists is always perceived as a specific, anthropomorphic deity.
Answer: False
Explanation: The transcendent reality in Ietsism is characterized by its unspecified and undetermined nature, not as a specific, anthropomorphic deity.
The key characteristic of the transcendent reality in Ietsism is that it remains 'undetermined' and 'unspecified.'
Answer: True
Explanation: The primary characteristic of the transcendent reality in Ietsism is its 'undetermined' and 'unspecified' nature, meaning its form or attributes are not defined by the believer.
Ietsists commonly believe in a personal God who actively intervenes in daily life.
Answer: False
Explanation: Ietsists typically do not believe in a personal God who actively intervenes in daily life; their belief centers on an unspecified transcendent reality.
A common characteristic among ietsists is the lack of belief in a personal God who actively intervenes in human affairs.
Answer: True
Explanation: A prevalent characteristic among ietsists is the absence of belief in a personal God who actively intervenes in human affairs, aligning with their focus on an unspecified transcendent reality.
An ietsist believes life has no inherent meaning and rejects any possibility of transcendence.
Answer: False
Explanation: An ietsist may accept the possibility of 'something' constituting meaning or transcendence, without defining it, rather than rejecting it outright.
What is the fundamental definition of Ietsism?
Answer: An unspecified belief in a transcendent reality without specific religious doctrines.
What is the defining characteristic of an ietsist's belief system?
Answer: Affirmation of an undefined transcendent reality.
What is true about the diversity of beliefs within Ietsism?
Answer: Beliefs are highly diverse, but united by non-classification under established religion.
What is the primary characteristic of the 'transcendent reality' believed in by ietsists?
Answer: It is 'undetermined' and 'unspecified.'
The Dutch term 'ietsisme' translates directly to 'nothingism' in English.
Answer: False
Explanation: The Dutch term 'ietsisme' translates to 'somethingism' in English, derived from 'iets' meaning 'something'.
'Ietsisme' is derived from the Dutch word 'iets,' which means 'something.'
Answer: True
Explanation: The term 'ietsisme' originates from the Dutch word 'iets,' which directly translates to 'something,' indicating the core concept of belief in an unspecified entity.
The Dutch term used to refer to people holding the ietsist viewpoint is 'ietsists'.
Answer: False
Explanation: The Dutch term used to refer to people holding the ietsist viewpoint is 'ietsers,' not 'ietsists'.
In the Netherlands, the term 'ietsers' is used to describe individuals who adhere to the ietsist viewpoint.
Answer: True
Explanation: In the Netherlands, the term 'ietsers' has emerged to describe individuals who adhere to the ietsist viewpoint.
The Dutch word 'iets,' meaning 'something,' is central to the etymological understanding of Ietsism.
Answer: True
Explanation: The term 'ietsism' is etymologically rooted in the Dutch word 'iets,' meaning 'something,' underscoring the belief in an unspecified transcendent reality.
The term 'ietsers' is the English equivalent for people who follow Ietsism.
Answer: False
Explanation: The term 'ietsers' is a Dutch term used in the Netherlands for adherents of Ietsism; it is not the English equivalent.
'Ietsers' is a Dutch term used in the Netherlands to refer to adherents of Ietsism.
Answer: True
Explanation: In the Netherlands, 'ietsers' is the term used to refer to individuals who adhere to the ietsist viewpoint.
What is the literal English translation of the Dutch term 'ietsisme'?
Answer: Somethingism
What is the Dutch term used for people who hold the viewpoint of Ietsism?
Answer: Ietsers
'Ietsism' is the North American term used to describe individuals who are 'spiritual but not religious.'
Answer: False
Explanation: The term 'ietsism' is primarily used in Europe, while 'spiritual but not religious' is the more common North American equivalent for similar sentiments.
Ietsism is closely related to the concept of being 'spiritual but not religious,' with 'ietsism' being the preferred European term.
Answer: True
Explanation: Ietsism is closely aligned with the concept of being 'spiritual but not religious,' with 'ietsism' being the term more commonly adopted in European contexts.
The term 'ietsisme' was added to the Dutch Language Dictionary (*Dikke Van Dale*) in 2015.
Answer: False
Explanation: The term 'ietsisme' was officially recognized and added to the Dutch Language Dictionary (*Dikke Van Dale*) in October 2005, not 2015.
The Dutch term 'ietsisme' was officially recognized in the 14th edition of the *Dikke Van Dale* in October 2005.
Answer: True
Explanation: The term 'ietsisme' was officially recognized and included in the 14th edition of the Dutch Language Dictionary, known as *Dikke Van Dale*, in October 2005.
The term 'ietsism' began circulating in English as a loanword around the year 2000.
Answer: False
Explanation: The term 'ietsism' began circulating as a loanword in English approximately in 2012, not around the year 2000.
'Ietsism' started circulating among English speakers as a loanword approximately in 2012.
Answer: True
Explanation: The term 'ietsism' began circulating among English speakers as a loanword approximately in 2012, indicating its increasing recognition beyond the Netherlands.
How does 'Ietsism' relate to the concept of 'spiritual but not religious'?
Answer: 'Ietsism' is the European term for similar sentiments.
Who played a significant role in the origin and popularization of the term 'ietsism'?
Answer: Ronald Plasterk in a 1997 article and television appearance.
When was 'ietsisme' officially recognized in the Dutch Language Dictionary (*Dikke Van Dale*)?
Answer: October 2005
Around what year did 'ietsism' begin circulating as a loanword in English?
Answer: 2012
Ietsists, unlike traditional agnostics, typically express certainty about the non-existence of God.
Answer: False
Explanation: Unlike traditional agnostics who state they 'can't know,' ietsists often express an intuition like 'there must be something out there,' indicating a belief in an unspecified transcendent reality rather than certainty about non-existence.
While agnostics state they 'can't know,' ietsists often express an intuition like 'there must be something out there.'
Answer: True
Explanation: Traditional agnostics often express skepticism by stating 'We can't know,' whereas ietsists frequently articulate an intuition such as 'there must be something out there,' signifying a belief in an unspecified transcendent reality.
Ietsism is considered incompatible with religious liberalism due to its lack of defined doctrines.
Answer: False
Explanation: Ietsism aligns with religious liberalism by allowing belief in transcendence without adherence to specific religious structures or defined doctrines.
Ietsism aligns with religious liberalism by allowing belief in transcendence without adherence to specific religious structures.
Answer: True
Explanation: Ietsism aligns with religious liberalism by enabling individuals to believe in a transcendent reality without being bound by the specific doctrines or structures of established religions.
Ietsism is considered the opposite of nihilism, affirming absolute meaning and purpose in existence.
Answer: False
Explanation: Ietsism functions as a minimal counterpart to nihilism by affirming 'something' (potential meaning) while assuming as little as possible about its nature, thus minimizing existential claims, rather than affirming absolute meaning and purpose.
Ietsism functions as a minimal counterpart to nihilism by affirming 'something' without defining it, thus minimizing existential claims.
Answer: True
Explanation: Ietsism serves as a minimal counterpart to nihilism by affirming the existence of 'something' (potential meaning) while making the fewest possible assumptions about its nature, thereby minimizing existential claims.
It is impossible for someone to be both an ietsist and an atheist simultaneously.
Answer: False
Explanation: It is possible for someone to be both an ietsist and an atheist, as belief in an unspecified 'something' does not necessitate belief in a personal God.
An individual can be both an ietsist and an atheist, as belief in 'something' doesn't necessitate belief in a personal God.
Answer: True
Explanation: An individual can simultaneously identify as an ietsist and an atheist, as the belief in an unspecified 'something' does not inherently require the affirmation of a personal, intervening deity.
Ietsism touches upon similar ideas to the perennial philosophy, which suggests commonality in religious traditions.
Answer: True
Explanation: Ietsism resonates with concepts found in the perennial philosophy, which posits an underlying unity or commonality across diverse religious and spiritual traditions.
Agnostic theism and Ietsism are identical in their approach to defining God.
Answer: False
Explanation: Agnostic theism and Ietsism differ in their approach; while both involve uncertainty, agnostic theists believe in God but acknowledge limits of knowledge, whereas many ietsists reject the conventional concept of 'God' altogether.
While both involve uncertainty, ietsists often reject the conventional concept of 'God' more readily than agnostic theists.
Answer: True
Explanation: While both agnostic theists and ietsists acknowledge uncertainty, ietsists are more inclined to reject the conventional concept of 'God' in favor of an unspecified transcendent reality.
The concept of the 'Unknown God' is unrelated to Ietsism's belief in an undefined transcendent reality.
Answer: False
Explanation: The 'Unknown God' concept is relevant to Ietsism as both point to a divine or transcendent reality whose specific nature remains unknown or undefined by the believer.
The 'Unknown God' concept is relevant to Ietsism as both point to a divine reality whose nature is unknown.
Answer: True
Explanation: The 'Unknown God' concept is relevant to Ietsism, as both frameworks acknowledge a divine or transcendent reality whose specific nature remains unknown or undefined by the adherent.
Deism believes in an unspecified higher power, while Ietsism posits a defined creator.
Answer: False
Explanation: Deism typically posits a more defined creator than the unspecified 'something' central to Ietsism, which believes in an unspecified higher power.
While both may involve a non-interventionist higher power, Deism typically posits a more defined creator than the unspecified 'something' in Ietsism.
Answer: True
Explanation: While both Deism and Ietsism may involve a non-interventionist higher power, Deism generally posits a more defined creator compared to the unspecified 'something' that is central to Ietsism.
The term 'Higher Power' is unrelated to the ietsist belief in 'something' transcendent.
Answer: False
Explanation: The concept of a 'Higher Power' aligns with the ietsist belief in a force greater than oneself, without specific definition, thus it is related to the belief in 'something' transcendent.
The concept of a 'Higher Power' aligns with the ietsist belief in a force greater than oneself, without specific definition.
Answer: True
Explanation: The term 'Higher Power' resonates with the ietsist belief in a force or entity greater than oneself, aligning with the concept of 'something' transcendent without requiring specific definition.
Classical theism is characterized by an unspecified transcendent reality, similar to Ietsism.
Answer: False
Explanation: Classical theism refers to specific philosophical conceptions of God (e.g., immutable), unlike Ietsism's unspecified transcendent reality.
Classical theism refers to specific philosophical conceptions of God (e.g., immutable), unlike Ietsism's unspecified reality.
Answer: True
Explanation: Classical theism is defined by specific philosophical conceptions of God, such as immutability, which contrasts with Ietsism's focus on an unspecified transcendent reality.
Fideism emphasizes faith in specific doctrines, whereas Ietsism lacks specific doctrines.
Answer: True
Explanation: Fideism is characterized by an emphasis on faith in specific doctrines, contrasting with Ietsism, which is defined by its lack of specific doctrines and its belief in an unspecified transcendent reality.
Moralistic Therapeutic Deism (MTD) involves belief in an unspecified transcendent reality, while Ietsism defines God's role.
Answer: False
Explanation: MTD sees God as a helper for happiness, often with a more defined role than the unspecified 'something' in Ietsism, which does not define God's role.
MTD sees God as a helper for happiness, often more defined than the unspecified 'something' in Ietsism.
Answer: True
Explanation: Moralistic Therapeutic Deism (MTD) typically views God as a facilitator of personal happiness, often assigning a more defined role than the fundamentally unspecified 'something' central to Ietsism.
Secular Buddhism shares with Ietsism a departure from traditional religious dogma, but Secular Buddhism is rooted in a specific tradition.
Answer: True
Explanation: Secular Buddhism, like Ietsism, represents a departure from traditional religious dogma; however, Secular Buddhism remains grounded in the specific philosophical and ethical framework of Buddhism.
Spiritual naturalism grounds itself in nature, whereas Ietsism's 'something' is explicitly transcendent and undefined.
Answer: True
Explanation: Spiritual naturalism anchors its beliefs within a naturalistic worldview, whereas Ietsism posits the existence of a 'something' that is explicitly transcendent and remains undefined.
Religious humanism emphasizes human reason and ethics, positing meaning within human experience rather than a transcendent deity.
Answer: True
Explanation: Religious humanism prioritizes human reason and ethics, finding meaning within human experience rather than relying on a transcendent deity, which distinguishes it from Ietsism's belief in an unspecified transcendent reality.
How does an ietsist's typical statement differ from a traditional agnostic's?
Answer: Ietsists express intuition ('something out there'); agnostics express skepticism ('can't know').
In what way does Ietsism serve as a minimal counterpart to nihilism?
Answer: It affirms 'something' (potential meaning) while assuming as little as possible, minimizing existential claims.
Can someone be both an ietsist and an atheist?
Answer: Yes, belief in 'something' does not preclude atheism.
How is Ietsism described in relation to 'intrinsic aliquidism'?
Answer: As a form of 'intrinsic aliquidism' without further specification.
How does Ietsism differ from Deism?
Answer: Deism typically posits a more defined creator than the unspecified 'something' in Ietsism.
How does the concept of a 'Higher Power' relate to Ietsism?
Answer: It represents a belief in something greater, aligning with the unspecified 'something' in Ietsism.
What distinguishes Ietsism from 'classical theism'?
Answer: Classical theism refers to specific philosophical conceptions of God (e.g., immutable), unlike Ietsism's unspecified reality.
What is a key difference between Fideism and Ietsism?
Answer: Fideism emphasizes faith in specific doctrines, whereas Ietsism lacks specific doctrines.
What distinguishes Moralistic Therapeutic Deism (MTD) from Ietsism?
Answer: MTD sees God as a helper for happiness, often more defined than the unspecified 'something' in Ietsism.
What is a similarity between Secular Buddhism and Ietsism mentioned in the source?
Answer: Both represent a departure from traditional religious dogma.
How does 'Spiritual naturalism' compare to Ietsism?
Answer: Spiritual naturalism grounds itself in nature, whereas Ietsism's 'something' is explicitly transcendent and undefined.
What does 'religious humanism' entail, and how does it differ from Ietsism?
Answer: Religious humanism emphasizes human reason and ethics, positing meaning within human experience rather than a transcendent deity.
While diverse, all ietsists share the characteristic that their beliefs are not classifiable under a traditional, established religion.
Answer: True
Explanation: Despite the diversity in their specific beliefs, a unifying characteristic of ietsists is that their worldview is not classifiable under a traditional, established religious framework.
A 2004 poll by the Dutch newspaper *Trouw* suggested approximately 40% of its readership felt aligned with the ietsist viewpoint.
Answer: True
Explanation: An opinion poll conducted by the Dutch newspaper *Trouw* in October 2004 indicated that roughly 40% of its readership expressed sentiments broadly aligned with the ietsist viewpoint.
According to a 2014 survey, the majority of the Dutch population identified as ietsists.
Answer: False
Explanation: A 2014 survey indicated that 27% of the Dutch population identified as ietsists, not a majority.
According to a 2014 survey, 27% of the Dutch population identified as ietsists.
Answer: True
Explanation: A survey conducted in December 2014 by the Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam found that 27% of the Dutch population identified as ietsists.
Ietsism poses no challenges for statistical analysis of religious demographics due to its clear and unambiguous definition.
Answer: False
Explanation: The ambiguity inherent in Ietsism's definition presents challenges for accurate statistical classification within religious demographics.
The ambiguity of Ietsism makes it problematic for accurate statistical classification in religious demographics.
Answer: True
Explanation: The lack of precise definition for Ietsism makes it difficult to accurately classify individuals within religious demographics, posing challenges for statistical analysis.
Ietsism is typically classified under 'Monotheistic religion' in broader categorizations.
Answer: False
Explanation: Ietsism is typically classified under 'Nontheistic religion' or similar categories, as it does not adhere to the tenets of monotheism or any specific defined deity.
Sidebar navigation often classifies Ietsism under the broader category of 'Nontheistic religion.'
Answer: True
Explanation: Sidebar navigation and broader categorizations often place Ietsism under 'Nontheistic religion,' alongside related concepts like Agnosticism and Atheism.
Ietsism is considered the opposite of irreligion, requiring explicit adherence to non-religious systems.
Answer: False
Explanation: Ietsism is not the opposite of irreligion; rather, it can be considered a form of irreligion as it does not adhere to the doctrines of established religions.
Ietsism could potentially fit under 'transtheism' as it transcends specific religious definitions of God.
Answer: True
Explanation: Ietsism could potentially be categorized under 'transtheism' due to its nature of transcending specific, conventional religious definitions of God.
Ietsism is considered the opposite of irreligion, requiring explicit adherence to non-religious systems.
Answer: False
Explanation: Ietsism is not the opposite of irreligion; rather, it can be considered a form of irreligion as it does not adhere to the doctrines of established religions.
Ietsism is a form of irreligion as it doesn't adhere to the doctrines of established religions.
Answer: True
Explanation: Ietsism can be classified as a form of irreligion because it does not conform to the doctrines or practices of established religious institutions.
What did a 2004 opinion poll by the Dutch newspaper *Trouw* reveal?
Answer: That approximately 40% of its readership felt broadly aligned with the ietsist viewpoint.
According to a December 2014 survey by Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, what percentage of the Dutch population identified as ietsists?
Answer: 27%
Why is Ietsism considered problematic for statistical analysis of religious demographics?
Answer: Its ambiguity makes neat classification as religious or non-religious difficult.
Under which broader category is Ietsism typically classified in sidebar navigation?
Answer: Nontheistic Religion
How might Ietsism be related to 'transtheism'?
Answer: Ietsism could fall under transtheism as it transcends specific religious definitions of God.
Where does Ietsism fit within the concept of 'irreligion'?
Answer: Ietsism is a form of irreligion as it doesn't adhere to the doctrines of established religions.
A typical ietsist response when asked about belief in God is, 'I am certain God exists and follows a specific doctrine.'
Answer: False
Explanation: A typical ietsist response is more akin to 'No, but there must be something,' reflecting belief in an unspecified transcendent reality rather than certainty about a specific doctrine.
An ietsist might commonly say, 'No, but there must be something,' indicating belief in an undefined transcendent reality.
Answer: True
Explanation: The phrase 'No, but there must be something' is a common expression for ietsists, signifying their belief in an unspecified transcendent reality beyond the material world.
Individuals identifying as ietsists are prohibited from claiming any cultural affiliation with a specific religion.
Answer: False
Explanation: Individuals identifying as ietsists are not prohibited from claiming cultural affiliation with a specific religion; they may do so without necessarily believing its specific theological teachings.
An ietsist may identify culturally with a religion without believing its specific theological teachings.
Answer: True
Explanation: It is common for an ietsist to maintain a cultural affiliation with a religion while not subscribing to its specific theological doctrines or dogma.
An ietsist might combine elements from various religions, folk beliefs, or superstitions without fully adhering to any single one.
Answer: True
Explanation: An individual identifying as an ietsist may integrate concepts from diverse religious traditions, folk beliefs, or superstitions into their personal worldview, without committing to the tenets of any single established religion.
An ietsist may accept there might be 'something' constituting meaning, without defining it.
Answer: True
Explanation: An ietsist may acknowledge the potential existence of meaning or a greater purpose, represented by 'something,' without specifying or defining its exact nature.
An ietsist might engage in mystical practices seeking experience of the unspecified transcendent reality.
Answer: True
Explanation: It is plausible for an ietsist to engage in mystical practices as a means to seek direct experience of the unspecified transcendent reality they believe in.
Which phrase commonly encapsulates an ietsist's perspective when asked about belief in God?
Answer: No, but there must be something.
Can an ietsist also have a cultural affiliation with a specific religion?
Answer: Yes, cultural affiliation is common without doctrinal belief.
What might an ietsist incorporate into their personal belief system?
Answer: Elements from various religions, folk beliefs, or superstitions.
How might an ietsist approach the concept of the 'meaning of life'?
Answer: They accept there might be 'something' constituting meaning, without defining it.
How might mysticism intersect with Ietsism?
Answer: An ietsist might engage in mystical practices seeking experience of the unspecified transcendent reality.