Explanation: The Intendancy of San Salvador was established in 1785, not the early 1770s. While the broader context of Spanish reforms was influenced by global events, including the American Revolution, the specific establishment date is later.

Explanation: The Intendancy of San Salvador was an administrative division *within* the Captaincy General of Guatemala, which was part of the Viceroyalty of New Spain and thus integral to the Spanish Empire. It was not an independent entity.

Explanation: The primary objective of the Bourbon Reforms was to centralize governance and strengthen royal authority, not to decentralize power or grant more autonomy to local elites. These reforms aimed to diminish the influence of colonial elites.

Explanation: Indeed, before the creation of the Intendancy of San Salvador in 1785, the administrative structure in place was the Greater Mayorship of San Salvador, which represented an earlier form of colonial governance.

Explanation: Conversely, the creation of the Intendancy of San Salvador, along with other similar administrative units, significantly diminished the power and influence previously held by the Captaincy General of Guatemala.

Explanation: On the contrary, the formation of the Intendancy of San Salvador in 1785 diminished Guatemala's economic control, as it gained direct management over the significant indigo export revenues that were previously managed by Guatemala.

Explanation: This is correct. The Intendancy of San Salvador was established in 1785 as part of the broader Bourbon Reforms, which were heavily influenced by Enlightenment ideals concerning rational governance and administrative efficiency.

Explanation: This is incorrect. The infobox for the Intendancy of San Salvador displays the flag of Spain and the coat of arms of New Spain, not the flag of the United States.

Explanation: This is correct. The Bourbon Reforms were a series of measures implemented by the Spanish Crown with the explicit aim of centralizing power, increasing administrative efficiency, and strengthening royal control over the colonies.

Explanation: The Intendancy of San Salvador functioned as an administrative division within the Captaincy General of Guatemala, which itself was part of the Viceroyalty of New Spain, and thus an integral component of the Spanish Empire.

Explanation: The Intendancy of San Salvador was established as part of the comprehensive Bourbon Reforms, a series of administrative and economic changes implemented by the Spanish Crown in the late 18th century.

Explanation: The Intendancy of San Salvador replaced the Greater Mayorship of San Salvador, which had been the primary administrative unit governing the region prior to the implementation of the Bourbon Reforms.

Explanation: The creation of the Intendancy of San Salvador led to a significant reduction in the power and influence of the Captaincy General of Guatemala, as direct royal administration was implemented in the region.

Explanation: While Comayagua, León, and San Salvador were established as intendancies during the Bourbon Reforms, Guatemala City remained the seat of the Captaincy General and was not itself established as a new intendancy during that specific reform period.

Explanation: The primary goal of the Bourbon Reforms was to centralize governance structures and significantly strengthen the Spanish monarchy's direct authority over its colonial possessions.

Explanation: The Intendancy of San Salvador was established in 1785 during the reign of Charles III, who was a key proponent of the Bourbon Reforms.

Explanation: Yes, San Salvador was indeed the capital city of the Intendancy of San Salvador throughout its existence from 1785 to 1821.

Explanation: This statement is incorrect. Manuel Fradique y Goyena was the former mayor of the region. The first colonial intendant appointed was José Ortiz de la Peña, who took office in 1786.

Explanation: This statement is false. A total of eight interim intendants served during the period between Ignacio Santiago Ulloa's death and the appointment of Antonio Gutiérrez y Ulloa.

Explanation: The first colonial intendant appointed to lead the Intendancy of San Salvador was José Ortiz de la Peña, who commenced his duties in 1786.

Explanation: A total of eight interim intendants served during the period from 1798, following Ulloa's death, until 1805 when Antonio Gutiérrez y Ulloa was appointed.

Explanation: Pedro Barriere served as the last colonial intendant of San Salvador, holding the office from 1819 until the intendancy's dissolution in 1821.

Explanation: The Intendancy of San Salvador was governed by a colonial intendant, an official appointed directly by the Spanish Crown, as part of the centralized administrative reforms.

Explanation: Spanish was the official language of the Spanish Empire and was indeed the commonly spoken language within the Intendancy of San Salvador. While indigenous languages may have persisted in certain communities, Spanish held official status and prevalence.

Explanation: Yes, Carondelet's administration is associated with a decrease in indigo production. This decline was linked to the reduced availability of indigenous labor, partly due to his recruitment policies for Spanish laborers.

Explanation: This is incorrect. Carondelet's recruitment policies led to an *increase* in the lighter-skinned population in northern El Salvador, as Spanish laborers were brought into the region.

Explanation: This is false. The Spanish Crown policy implemented in 1782 involved the reduction of tariffs and fees on trade, which stimulated economic activity, leading to increased imports and exports and overall economic growth in San Salvador.

Explanation: Indigo was the predominant cash crop and the primary export commodity, forming the backbone of the Intendancy's economy.

Explanation: During Carondelet's tenure, the recruitment of Spanish laborers led to a significant increase in the lighter-skinned population in northern El Salvador, particularly in areas like the Chalatenango Department.

Explanation: The 1782 policy, which reduced trade tariffs and fees, significantly boosted economic activity by increasing both imports and exports, thereby fostering economic growth within San Salvador.

Explanation: By the year 1800, the population of the Intendancy of San Salvador was recorded at 145,906 individuals.

Explanation: The stated purpose of Carondelet's recruitment was to increase the Spanish population in the region. However, this policy inadvertently led to a decrease in indigo production due to the displacement or decline of the indigenous labor force.

Explanation: Between 1778 and 1800, the population of the Intendancy of San Salvador experienced growth, increasing from approximately 117,436 to 145,906, representing an increase of nearly 30,000 individuals.

Explanation: The 1782 policy's significance lay in its reduction of trade tariffs and fees between Spain and its colonies, which stimulated economic activity by increasing both imports and exports.

Explanation: The decline in the indigenous population, partly due to Carondelet's labor recruitment policies, contributed directly to a decrease in the overall production of indigo, a key economic commodity.

Explanation: The 1811 Independence Movement was a significant event that led to the temporary overthrow of the Intendant, but it did not result in the permanent establishment of independence from Spain at that time. Full independence was achieved later.

Explanation: The Act of Independence of Central America was signed on September 15, 1821. While September 21, 1821, marks the date the Intendancy of San Salvador accepted this declaration and was dissolved, the signing date of the Act itself was September 15th.

Explanation: This is accurate. Following the acceptance of the Act of Independence of Central America, the Intendancy of San Salvador was dissolved and reorganized into the Province of San Salvador.

Explanation: This is incorrect. Pedro Barriere, the last intendant, did not retire immediately. Following the dissolution in 1821, he transitioned to the role of political chief of the newly formed Province of San Salvador.

Explanation: The Intendancy of San Salvador was succeeded by the Province of San Salvador, which then became part of the United Provinces of Central America. It was not succeeded by the Captaincy General of Guatemala, whose influence had already waned.

Explanation: This is accurate. The Intendancy of San Salvador was dissolved on September 21, 1821, following the formal acceptance of the Act of Independence of Central America.

Explanation: José Matías Delgado was among the prominent figures involved in the drafting and advocacy for the Act of Independence of Central America.

Explanation: The Act of Independence of Central America was formally signed on September 15, 1821.

Explanation: The Intendancy of San Salvador was succeeded by the Province of San Salvador, which subsequently became part of the newly formed United Provinces of Central America.

Explanation: After the dissolution of the intendancy and the achievement of independence, Pedro Barriere transitioned from his role as Intendant to serve as the political chief of the Province of San Salvador.

Explanation: Following its dissolution, the Intendancy of San Salvador joined the United Provinces of Central America, a new nation formed after independence from Spain.

Explanation: The Intendancy of San Salvador ceased to exist in the year 1821, coinciding with the declaration of independence for Central America.