Welcome!

Enter a player name to begin or load your saved progress.

Intermediate-Range Nuclear Forces Treaty Wiki2Web Clarity Challenge

Home Return to Study Hints Random
Global Score: 0
Trophies: 0 🏆

‹ Back

Score: 0 / 100

Study Guide: The Intermediate-Range Nuclear Forces (INF) Treaty: History, Provisions, and Demise

Cheat Sheet:
The Intermediate-Range Nuclear Forces (INF) Treaty: History, Provisions, and Demise Study Guide

Founding and Core Provisions of the INF Treaty

The Intermediate-Range Nuclear Forces Treaty was primarily focused on regulating air-launched and sea-launched missiles.

Answer: False

Explanation: The INF Treaty specifically prohibited ground-launched ballistic and cruise missiles, while explicitly stating that it did not apply to air- or sea-launched missiles.

Return to Game

The formal name of the INF Treaty included a specific mention of both intermediate-range and shorter-range missiles.

Answer: True

Explanation: The formal name of the treaty was 'Treaty Between the United States of America and the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics on the Elimination of Their Intermediate-Range and Shorter-Range Missiles,' explicitly mentioning both categories.

Return to Game

The INF Treaty was signed in Moscow, Russia, in December 1987.

Answer: False

Explanation: The INF Treaty was signed on 8 December 1987, at the White House in Washington, D.C., United States, not in Moscow.

Return to Game

Ronald Reagan and Mikhail Gorbachev were the key signatories of the Intermediate-Range Nuclear Forces Treaty.

Answer: True

Explanation: Mikhail Gorbachev, representing the Soviet Union, and Ronald Reagan, representing the United States, were the principal signatories of the INF Treaty.

Return to Game

The INF Treaty became effective immediately upon its signing in December 1987.

Answer: False

Explanation: The INF Treaty was signed in December 1987 but became effective on 1 June 1988, after ratification by both parties.

Return to Game

The INF Treaty included a clause allowing parties to withdraw with six months' notice if their supreme interests were jeopardized by extraordinary events.

Answer: True

Explanation: The treaty explicitly stated that each party had the right to withdraw with six months' notice if 'extraordinary events related to the subject matter of this Treaty have jeopardized its supreme interests'.

Return to Game

What was the primary classification of the Intermediate-Range Nuclear Forces Treaty?

Answer: A nuclear disarmament treaty

Explanation: The Intermediate-Range Nuclear Forces Treaty was classified as a nuclear disarmament treaty, specifically aimed at reducing or eliminating certain categories of nuclear weapons.

Return to Game

On what date and where was the INF Treaty signed?

Answer: 8 December 1987, at the White House in Washington, D.C.

Explanation: The INF Treaty was signed on 8 December 1987, at the White House in Washington, D.C., United States.

Return to Game

Which of the following missile ranges were prohibited by the INF Treaty for ground-launched systems?

Answer: 1,000–5,500 kilometers (intermediate-range) and 500–1,000 kilometers (shorter-range)

Explanation: The INF Treaty prohibited ground-launched ballistic and cruise missiles with ranges of 1,000–5,500 kilometers (intermediate-range) and 500–1,000 kilometers (shorter-range).

Return to Game

Historical Context and Initial Negotiations (1970s-1983)

The Soviet Union's deployment of the SS-20 Saber in 1976 was perceived as a more formidable threat than its predecessors due to its improved accuracy and mobility.

Answer: True

Explanation: The SS-20 Saber offered significant improvements in accuracy, mobility, greater range, and multiple warheads, making it a much more formidable and offensive threat compared to the older SS-4 and SS-5.

Return to Game

President Jimmy Carter immediately called for the deployment of new intermediate-range missiles in Europe in response to the SS-20 deployment.

Answer: False

Explanation: Initially, President Jimmy Carter's administration considered existing strategic nuclear weapons and nuclear-capable aircraft sufficient to counter the SS-20, not immediately calling for new intermediate-range missile deployments.

Return to Game

The NATO Double-Track Decision, made in 1979, involved both negotiations with the Soviet Union and, if necessary, modernization of NATO's own intermediate-range nuclear forces.

Answer: True

Explanation: The NATO Double-Track Decision, adopted in December 1979, explicitly pursued two paths: bilateral negotiations with the Soviet Union to limit theater nuclear forces, and, if negotiations failed, the modernization of NATO's intermediate-range nuclear forces.

Return to Game

The US planned to deploy Pershing II launchers and BGM-109G Ground Launched Cruise Missiles (GLCMs) in Europe as part of the NATO Double-Track Decision.

Answer: True

Explanation: As part of the NATO Double-Track Decision's modernization component, the US planned to deploy Pershing II launchers and BGM-109G Ground Launched Cruise Missiles (GLCMs) in Europe to counter Soviet SS-20 missiles.

Return to Game

Formal INF talks began in Geneva in October 1980, immediately after the Soviet invasion of Afghanistan.

Answer: False

Explanation: Preliminary INF talks began in Geneva in October 1980, amidst strained relations due to the 1979 Soviet invasion of Afghanistan. Formal talks, however, commenced in November 1981.

Return to Game

Ronald Reagan's 'Zero Option' proposal called for the US to deploy more GLCM and Pershing II systems if the Soviet Union did not eliminate its SS-4, SS-5, and SS-20 missiles.

Answer: False

Explanation: Reagan's 'Zero Option' proposal called for the US to halt its deployment of GLCM and Pershing II systems *if* the Soviet Union eliminated all its SS-4, SS-5, and SS-20 missiles, not to deploy more.

Return to Game

The Soviet Union readily accepted Reagan's 'Zero Option' proposal, seeing it as a fair path to disarmament.

Answer: False

Explanation: The Soviet Union rejected the Zero Option proposal, arguing that both the US and USSR should retain intermediate-range missiles in Europe.

Return to Game

The 'walk in the woods' initiative was a formal proposal introduced by the US and Soviet delegations to break the INF negotiating deadlock.

Answer: False

Explanation: The 'walk in the woods' was an *independent, informal* attempt by US and Soviet negotiators to bypass bureaucratic procedures, and it was never formally introduced into negotiations.

Return to Game

The 'walk in the woods' proposal was ultimately rejected by both Washington and Moscow.

Answer: True

Explanation: The 'walk in the woods' proposal found little traction in either capital, being opposed by the US Office of the Secretary of Defense and rejected by Moscow.

Return to Game

The Soviet Union ended INF negotiations in November 1983 after the US deployed its first Pershing II missiles in West Germany.

Answer: True

Explanation: The Soviet Union terminated INF negotiations in November 1983 following the arrival of the first US Pershing II missiles in West Germany, viewing this deployment as a direct threat.

Return to Game

What Soviet missile deployment in March 1976 prompted the Western response that eventually led to the INF Treaty?

Answer: SS-20 Saber (RSD-10 Pioneer)

Explanation: In March 1976, the Soviet Union first deployed the RSD-10 Pioneer, known as the SS-20 Saber in the West, which prompted the Western response.

Return to Game

Who was the Chancellor of West Germany who, in 1977, argued for a Western response to the SS-20 deployment?

Answer: Helmut Schmidt

Explanation: Helmut Schmidt, the Chancellor of West Germany, argued in a 1977 speech that a Western response to the SS-20 deployment should be explored.

Return to Game

What was one of the two main policy 'tracks' of the NATO Double-Track Decision made in 1979?

Answer: To pursue bilateral negotiations with the Soviet Union to limit theater nuclear forces.

Explanation: One of the two main policy 'tracks' of the NATO Double-Track Decision was to pursue bilateral negotiations with the Soviet Union to limit theater nuclear forces.

Return to Game

Who led the US delegation when formal INF talks began in November 1981?

Answer: Ronald Reagan

Explanation: When formal INF talks began on 30 November 1981, the US negotiators were led by President Ronald Reagan, with Paul Nitze leading the US delegation.

Return to Game

What was Ronald Reagan's 'Zero Option' proposal, made in November 1981?

Answer: A call for the US to halt its GLCM and Pershing II deployment if the Soviet Union eliminated all its SS-4, SS-5, and SS-20 missiles.

Explanation: Ronald Reagan's 'Zero Option' proposal called for the US to halt its deployment of GLCM and Pershing II systems if the Soviet Union eliminated all of its SS-4, SS-5, and SS-20 missiles.

Return to Game

What was the primary reason the 'walk in the woods' proposal failed to gain traction in Washington?

Answer: The Office of the Secretary of Defense opposed it because it would allow Soviet missile deployment while blocking American ones.

Explanation: The Office of the Secretary of Defense opposed the 'walk in the woods' proposal because it would have allowed Soviet missile deployment while blocking American ones, leading to its rejection in Washington.

Return to Game

What event led to the Soviet Union ending INF negotiations in November 1983?

Answer: The first US Pershing II missiles arrived in West Germany.

Explanation: The Soviet Union terminated INF negotiations in November 1983 following the arrival of the first US Pershing II missiles in West Germany.

Return to Game

Resumption of Negotiations and Treaty Signing (1986-1987)

British Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher played a significant role in brokering the resumption of negotiations between Reagan and Gorbachev in the mid-1980s.

Answer: True

Explanation: British Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher played a pivotal diplomatic role in brokering the negotiations between US President Ronald Reagan and Soviet General Secretary Mikhail Gorbachev in 1986-1987.

Return to Game

At the Reykjavík Summit in 1986, Reagan and Gorbachev agreed to eliminate all nuclear weapons by the year 2000.

Answer: False

Explanation: At the Reykjavík Summit in October 1986, Reagan and Gorbachev agreed in principle to remove INF systems from Europe and establish equal global limits of 100 INF missile warheads, not to eliminate all nuclear weapons globally by 2000.

Return to Game

West German Chancellor Helmut Kohl initially supported the total elimination of Pershing missiles but later reversed his stance, becoming an obstacle to the INF Treaty.

Answer: False

Explanation: West German Chancellor Helmut Kohl initially *opposed* the total elimination of Pershing missiles but later decided to remove the joint US-West German Pershing 1a systems, thereby removing a significant obstacle to the treaty.

Return to Game

Who played a key role in brokering the restarted negotiations between Reagan and Gorbachev in 1986-1987?

Answer: British Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher

Explanation: British Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher played a pivotal diplomatic role in brokering the negotiations between US President Ronald Reagan and Soviet General Secretary Mikhail Gorbachev in 1986-1987.

Return to Game

What significant agreement was reached in principle at the Reykjavík Summit in October 1986 regarding INF systems?

Answer: To remove INF systems from Europe and establish equal global limits of 100 INF missile warheads.

Explanation: At the Reykjavík Summit in October 1986, Reagan and Gorbachev agreed in principle to remove INF systems from Europe and establish equal global limits of 100 INF missile warheads.

Return to Game

Treaty Implementation and Post-Soviet Era (1988-2001)

By the treaty's deadline in 1991, the United States had eliminated more missiles than the Soviet Union.

Answer: False

Explanation: By the deadline of June 1, 1991, the US had destroyed 846 weapons, while the Soviet Union had destroyed 1,846 weapons, meaning the Soviet Union eliminated more missiles.

Return to Game

After the collapse of the Soviet Union, the US primarily focused on preserving the INF Treaty with Russia.

Answer: False

Explanation: After the dissolution of the Soviet Union, the US primarily focused on preserving the START I treaty with Belarus, Kazakhstan, Russia, and Ukraine, as the disarmament of INF missiles had already been completed.

Return to Game

On-site inspections for INF missile sites continued indefinitely after the treaty's signing.

Answer: False

Explanation: On-site inspections of INF missile sites continued until May 31, 2001, as stipulated by a 13-year inspection agreement, not indefinitely.

Return to Game

What was the total number of missiles eliminated by the United States and the Soviet Union by May 1991 under the INF Treaty?

Answer: 2,692 missiles

Explanation: By May 1991, the United States and the Soviet Union had eliminated a total of 2,692 missiles under the INF Treaty.

Return to Game

Which of the following US missiles was destroyed under the INF Treaty?

Answer: BGM-109G Ground Launched Cruise Missile

Explanation: The BGM-109G Ground Launched Cruise Missile was among the specific US missiles destroyed under the INF Treaty.

Return to Game

Which of the following Soviet missiles (by NATO reporting name) was destroyed under the INF Treaty?

Answer: SS-20 Saber

Explanation: The SS-20 Saber (RSD-10 Pioneer) was among the specific Soviet missiles destroyed under the INF Treaty.

Return to Game

After the collapse of the Soviet Union in December 1991, what was the primary focus of the United States regarding arms control?

Answer: Preserving the START I treaty with Belarus, Kazakhstan, Russia, and Ukraine.

Explanation: After the dissolution of the Soviet Union, the United States primarily focused on negotiations with Belarus, Kazakhstan, Russia, and Ukraine to preserve the START I treaty.

Return to Game

When did on-site inspections for INF missile sites conclude, as stipulated by the treaty's agreement?

Answer: May 31, 2001

Explanation: On-site inspections of INF missile sites continued until May 31, 2001, as stipulated by the 13-year inspection agreement within the treaty.

Return to Game

Challenges, Violations, and US Withdrawal (2007-2019)

The United States cited Russian non-compliance with the SSC-8 missile as the primary reason for its withdrawal from the INF Treaty.

Answer: True

Explanation: President Donald Trump announced the US withdrawal, primarily citing Russian non-compliance, specifically the development and deployment of the intermediate-range cruise missile known as the SSC-8 (Novator 9M729).

Return to Game

Russian President Vladimir Putin expressed concerns in 2007 that the INF Treaty unfairly restricted only Russia and the US, while other countries were unconstrained.

Answer: True

Explanation: In his 2007 Munich Security Conference speech, Vladimir Putin stated that the INF Treaty should be revisited as it only restricted Russia and the US, leaving other countries unconstrained.

Return to Game

Russia claimed its SSC-8 cruise missile had a range of 3,000 kilometers, which the US disputed as a violation of the INF Treaty.

Answer: False

Explanation: US officials claimed the Russian SSC-8 cruise missile had a range of 3,000 kilometers, violating the treaty. Russia, however, rejected this, stating its maximum range was only 480 kilometers.

Return to Game

NATO formally supported US claims of Russian INF Treaty violations in 2018.

Answer: True

Explanation: In 2018, NATO formally supported the US claims and accused Russia of breaking the INF Treaty, underscoring the seriousness of the allegations.

Return to Game

Russia counter-accused the US of violating the INF Treaty through its deployment of missile defense systems in Europe, which they argued could be retrofitted with offensive capabilities.

Answer: True

Explanation: Russian officials claimed that US missile defense systems in Europe violated the INF Treaty, arguing they could be quickly retrofitted with offensive capabilities, an assertion rejected by US and NATO officials.

Return to Game

US officials, even before the Trump administration, were concerned about China's arms buildup in the Pacific because China was a signatory to the INF Treaty but not complying.

Answer: False

Explanation: US officials were concerned about China's arms buildup because China was *not* a signatory to the INF Treaty, allowing it to operate without restriction, not because it was non-compliant as a signatory.

Return to Game

It was estimated that if China were a party to the INF Treaty, approximately 50% of its ground missile arsenal would have been outlawed.

Answer: False

Explanation: It was estimated that 90% of China's ground missile arsenal would have been outlawed if China were a party to the INF Treaty, not 50%.

Return to Game

The US President requires congressional approval to unilaterally withdraw from international treaties like the INF Treaty.

Answer: False

Explanation: A precedent has been established that the US President and executive branch can unilaterally withdraw from a treaty without congressional approval, as Congress has rarely acted to stop such decisions.

Return to Game

Besides Russian non-compliance, what additional reason did the Trump administration provide for withdrawing from the INF Treaty?

Answer: To counter a Chinese arms buildup in the Pacific

Explanation: The Trump administration also cited the need to counter a Chinese arms buildup in the Pacific, as China was not a signatory to the treaty, as an additional reason for withdrawal.

Return to Game

When did the United States formally withdraw from the INF Treaty?

Answer: 2 August 2019

Explanation: The United States formally withdrew from the INF Treaty on 2 August 2019, after suspending it on 1 February 2019.

Return to Game

In his 2007 Munich Security Conference speech, what did Russian President Vladimir Putin state about the INF Treaty?

Answer: He stated the treaty should be revisited as it only restricted Russia and the US but not other countries.

Explanation: In his 2007 Munich Security Conference speech, Vladimir Putin stated that the INF Treaty should be revisited to ensure security, as it only restricted Russia and the US but not other countries.

Return to Game

What specific Russian missile did US officials claim violated the INF Treaty in 2008?

Answer: SSC-8 cruise missile (Novator 9M729)

Explanation: US officials claimed Russia violated the INF Treaty in 2008 by testing the SSC-8 cruise missile (Novator 9M729), which they asserted had a range of 3,000 kilometers.

Return to Game

What was Russia's counter-accusation regarding US missile defense systems in Europe as a violation of the INF Treaty?

Answer: They could be quickly retrofitted with offensive capabilities.

Explanation: Russian officials claimed that US missile defense systems in Europe violated the INF Treaty because they could be quickly retrofitted with offensive capabilities.

Return to Game

What percentage of China's ground missile arsenal was estimated to have been outlawed if China were a party to the INF Treaty?

Answer: 90%

Explanation: It was estimated that 90% of China's ground missile arsenal would have been outlawed if China were a party to the INF Treaty.

Return to Game

What action did Russia take at the United Nations General Assembly in October 2018 regarding the INF Treaty?

Answer: It called for a vote to consider calling on Washington and Moscow to preserve and strengthen the treaty.

Explanation: In October 2018, Russia unsuccessfully called for a vote at the United Nations General Assembly to consider calling on Washington and Moscow to preserve and strengthen the INF Treaty.

Return to Game

What was Russia's response to the US ultimatum in December 2018, giving Russia 60 days to comply with the treaty?

Answer: Russia revealed their Peresvet combat laser, stating it had been deployed since 2017.

Explanation: In response to the US ultimatum in December 2018, Russia revealed their Peresvet combat laser, stating it had been deployed since 2017, a defiant gesture rather than a step towards compliance.

Return to Game

Consequences and Post-Treaty Landscape

Russia's immediate response to the US suspension of the INF Treaty in February 2019 was to announce a 'mirror response' and begin developing new intermediate-range hypersonic missiles.

Answer: True

Explanation: Immediately following the US suspension on February 2, 2019, Putin announced Russia's own suspension in a 'mirror response' and commenced work on new intermediate-range hypersonic missiles and land-based 3M-54 Kalibr systems.

Return to Game

Following the INF Treaty's demise, the US tested a ground-based version of the Tomahawk missile, which had been previously banned by the treaty.

Answer: True

Explanation: On August 18, 2019, after formally withdrawing from the INF Treaty, the US conducted a test firing of a ground-based version of the Tomahawk missile, similar to the BGM-109G that had been banned.

Return to Game

Former Soviet General Secretary Mikhail Gorbachev praised Trump's withdrawal from the INF Treaty as a necessary step for global security.

Answer: False

Explanation: Former Soviet General Secretary Mikhail Gorbachev criticized the US withdrawal as 'not the work of a great mind' and stated that 'a new arms race has been announced'.

Return to Game

NATO chief Stoltenberg suggested expanding the INF Treaty to include countries like China and India after its collapse.

Answer: True

Explanation: NATO chief Stoltenberg suggested that the INF Treaty could be expanded to include countries such as China and India, an idea both the US and Russia had indicated openness to.

Return to Game

What new missile systems did Russia begin developing immediately after suspending the INF Treaty in February 2019?

Answer: Intermediate-range hypersonic missiles and land-based 3M-54 Kalibr systems.

Explanation: After suspending the INF Treaty, Russia immediately began work on new intermediate-range hypersonic missiles along with land-based 3M-54 Kalibr systems.

Return to Game

What type of missile did the US test fire on August 18, 2019, after formally withdrawing from the INF Treaty?

Answer: A ground-based version of the Tomahawk missile.

Explanation: On August 18, 2019, the US conducted a test firing of a ground-based version of the Tomahawk missile, a capability previously banned by the INF Treaty.

Return to Game

How did former Soviet General Secretary Mikhail Gorbachev react to Trump's nuclear treaty withdrawal?

Answer: He called it 'not the work of a great mind' and stated 'a new arms race has been announced.'

Explanation: Former Soviet General Secretary Mikhail Gorbachev criticized the US withdrawal from the nuclear treaty as 'not the work of a great mind' and stated that 'a new arms race has been announced'.

Return to Game

What new weapon system was developed and deployed by the US in 2023 following the INF Treaty's demise?

Answer: The Typhon Medium Range Capability weapon system

Explanation: Following the United States' withdrawal from the INF Treaty, the Typhon Medium Range Capability weapon system was developed and deployed in 2023, representing a capability previously prohibited.

Return to Game

According to Brazilian journalist Augusto Dall'Agnol, what broader context is important for understanding the INF Treaty's demise?

Answer: The gradual erosion of the strategic arms control regime, beginning with the US withdrawal from the ABM Treaty in 2002.

Explanation: Brazilian journalist Augusto Dall'Agnol suggests that the INF Treaty's demise should be understood within the broader context of the gradual erosion of the strategic arms control regime, initiated by the US withdrawal from the ABM Treaty in 2002.

Return to Game