Enter a player name to begin or load your saved progress.
Kate Steinle was fatally shot on July 1, 2015, while walking near Pier 14 in San Francisco.
Answer: True
Explanation: According to the source, Kate Steinle was fatally shot on July 1, 2015, while walking near Pier 14 in San Francisco.
The gunshot wound that killed Kate Steinle entered through her chest and pierced her lungs.
Answer: False
Explanation: The source indicates that the gunshot wound entered Kate Steinle's back and pierced her aorta, not her chest and lungs.
Kate Steinle was a 32-year-old resident of Pleasanton, California, who worked for a medical device company.
Answer: True
Explanation: The source identifies Kate Steinle as a 32-year-old resident of Pleasanton, California, who was employed by Medtronic.
Kate Steinle was approximately 90 feet away from the shooter when she was struck by the bullet.
Answer: True
Explanation: The source states that Kate Steinle was approximately 90 feet away from the shooter when she was struck by the bullet.
The gunshot wound directly caused Kate Steinle's death by piercing her aorta.
Answer: True
Explanation: The gunshot wound entered Kate Steinle's back, pierced her aorta, and directly led to her death.
Kate Steinle's funeral was held in San Francisco shortly after her death.
Answer: False
Explanation: Kate Steinle's funeral was held in Pleasanton, California, not in San Francisco.
The shooting occurred on July 4, 2015.
Answer: False
Explanation: The fatal shooting of Kate Steinle occurred on July 1, 2015, not July 4, 2015.
The incident took place at Pier 7.
Answer: False
Explanation: The incident occurred at Pier 14, not Pier 7.
Kate Steinle was 28 years old at the time of her death.
Answer: False
Explanation: Kate Steinle was 32 years old at the time of her death, not 28.
Where did the fatal shooting of Kate Steinle occur?
Answer: While walking along Pier 14 in San Francisco's Embarcadero district.
Explanation: Kate Steinle was shot and killed while walking along Pier 14 in San Francisco's Embarcadero district.
How did Kate Steinle die, according to the source?
Answer: She succumbed to injuries from a ricochet shot that pierced her aorta.
Explanation: Kate Steinle died from a single gunshot wound that pierced her aorta, resulting from a bullet that had ricocheted off the pier.
What was the distance between Kate Steinle and the shooter at the moment she was hit?
Answer: Approximately 90 feet.
Explanation: Kate Steinle was approximately 90 feet away from the shooter when she was struck by the bullet.
José Inez García Zárate claimed he accidentally discharged the firearm after finding it beneath a bench.
Answer: True
Explanation: José Inez García Zárate asserted that he found the firearm beneath a bench and that it discharged accidentally when he picked it up.
The person accused of shooting Kate Steinle was identified only as Juan Francisco López-Sánchez.
Answer: False
Explanation: The accused individual was identified by both the name José Inez García Zárate and Juan Francisco López-Sánchez.
García Zárate was a U.S. citizen who had never been deported prior to the incident.
Answer: False
Explanation: García Zárate was an undocumented immigrant who had been deported from the U.S. multiple times prior to the incident.
García Zárate was deported from the U.S. for the seventh time on March 1, 2024.
Answer: True
Explanation: According to the provided text, José Inéz García Zárate was deported from the United States for the seventh time on March 1, 2024.
What was José Inez García Zárate's explanation for the shooting?
Answer: He stated he found the gun under a bench and it discharged accidentally when he picked it up.
Explanation: García Zárate claimed he found the gun under a bench and that it discharged accidentally when he picked it up.
What was García Zárate's immigration status and history relevant to the case?
Answer: He was an undocumented immigrant deported five times previously.
Explanation: García Zárate was an undocumented immigrant who had been deported from the U.S. five times prior to the incident.
The provided text focuses solely on the legal acquittal of José Inez García Zárate for the murder of Kate Steinle.
Answer: False
Explanation: The provided source material details the incident, the accused's background, the legal proceedings, the firearm involved, and the subsequent political and legal ramifications, extending beyond solely the acquittal.
A jury found García Zárate guilty of murder and manslaughter charges after deliberation.
Answer: False
Explanation: The jury acquitted García Zárate of murder and manslaughter charges; he was not found guilty of these charges.
García Zárate was convicted of being a felon in possession of a firearm in the state trial, but this conviction was later upheld on appeal.
Answer: False
Explanation: While García Zárate was convicted of being a felon in possession of a firearm in the state trial, this conviction was subsequently overturned on appeal.
Federal charges against García Zárate included involuntary manslaughter and assault with a deadly weapon, but these were dropped.
Answer: True
Explanation: The federal charges of involuntary manslaughter and assault with a deadly weapon were dropped due to lack of evidence, although he later pleaded guilty to being a felon in possession of a firearm.
García Zárate received a sentence of ten years in jail for the federal firearm charge.
Answer: False
Explanation: In the federal case, García Zárate was sentenced to seven years in jail, not ten.
García Zárate was initially charged with second-degree murder and illegal possession of narcotics.
Answer: False
Explanation: García Zárate was initially charged with first-degree murder and possession of illegal narcotics, not second-degree murder.
The jury convicted García Zárate of manslaughter but acquitted him of the firearm possession charge.
Answer: False
Explanation: The jury acquitted García Zárate of manslaughter and murder charges but convicted him of the firearm possession charge.
García Zárate pleaded guilty to involuntary manslaughter in federal court.
Answer: False
Explanation: García Zárate pleaded guilty to being a felon in possession of a firearm in federal court, not involuntary manslaughter.
García Zárate's state conviction for firearm possession was overturned because the jury instructions were deemed accurate.
Answer: False
Explanation: García Zárate's state conviction for firearm possession was overturned on appeal because the judge had failed to provide the jury with instructions regarding one of the defendant's defenses.
Federal Judge Vince Chhabria warned García Zárate against returning to the United States after his sentencing.
Answer: True
Explanation: Federal Judge Vince Chhabria issued a stern warning to García Zárate not to return to the United States after his sentencing.
García Zárate pleaded guilty to involuntary manslaughter as his final federal charge.
Answer: False
Explanation: García Zárate pleaded guilty to being a felon in possession of a firearm in federal court, not involuntary manslaughter.
The defense called the lead prosecutor as their first witness after the prosecution rested.
Answer: False
Explanation: The defense called the crime lab supervisor as their first witness after the prosecution rested, not the lead prosecutor.
What was the verdict reached by the jury regarding the murder and manslaughter charges against García Zárate?
Answer: Not guilty on all counts (acquitted).
Explanation: The jury acquitted García Zárate of all murder and manslaughter charges.
In the state trial, what charge was García Zárate convicted of, and what happened to that conviction?
Answer: Convicted of firearm possession; conviction overturned on appeal.
Explanation: García Zárate was convicted of being a felon in possession of a firearm in the state trial, but this conviction was later overturned on appeal.
What was the final federal court outcome for José Inéz García Zárate?
Answer: Pleaded guilty to being a felon in possession of a firearm and received a seven-year sentence.
Explanation: García Zárate pleaded guilty to being a felon in possession of a firearm in federal court and received a seven-year sentence.
Why was García Zárate's state conviction for being a felon in possession of a firearm overturned?
Answer: The judge failed to instruct the jury on one of the defendant's defenses.
Explanation: García Zárate's state conviction for firearm possession was overturned on appeal because the judge had failed to provide the jury with instructions regarding one of the defendant's defenses.
What warning did federal judge Vince Chhabria issue to García Zárate at his sentencing?
Answer: A stern warning not to return to the United States.
Explanation: Federal Judge Vince Chhabria issued a stern warning to García Zárate not to return to the United States after his sentencing.
What specific charge did García Zárate plead guilty to in federal court?
Answer: Being a felon in possession of a firearm.
Explanation: García Zárate pleaded guilty to the federal charge of being a felon in possession of a firearm.
The handgun used in the shooting was purchased legally by García Zárate a month before the incident.
Answer: False
Explanation: The firearm used in the shooting was reported as stolen from a BLM ranger's vehicle, not legally purchased by García Zárate.
The BLM ranger testified that he kept his firearm secured in his patrol car, not his personal vehicle.
Answer: False
Explanation: The BLM ranger testified that he kept the firearm in a backpack under the front seat of his personal vehicle, not his patrol car.
The defense argued that the Sig Sauer P239 pistol had a safety mechanism that prevented accidental discharge.
Answer: False
Explanation: The defense argued that the Sig Sauer P239 pistol lacked an external safety mechanism, making accidental discharge plausible, not that it had a mechanism preventing it.
A San Francisco Police Department crime lab supervisor testified that the gun could have fired without the trigger being pulled.
Answer: False
Explanation: The SFPD crime lab supervisor testified that the gun would not have fired unless the trigger was pulled, contradicting the idea that it could fire without user interaction.
The prosecution argued that the bullet was fired intentionally towards Kate Steinle after ricocheting off the pier.
Answer: True
Explanation: The prosecution contended that the bullet was fired intentionally towards Kate Steinle, and evidence suggested it ricocheted off the pier before striking her.
Ballistics experts determined the bullet struck the pier, ricocheted, and then traveled approximately 78 feet to hit Kate Steinle.
Answer: True
Explanation: Investigators and ballistics experts agreed that the bullet struck the pier, ricocheted, and then traveled approximately 78 feet to hit Kate Steinle.
The defense argued that the SIG Sauer P239's lack of an external safety made an accidental discharge plausible when handling the weapon.
Answer: True
Explanation: The defense emphasized that the SIG Sauer P239's lack of an external safety mechanism contributed to the plausibility of an accidental discharge during handling.
The prosecution's firearms expert, John Evans, stated that the bullet showed no signs of a ricochet.
Answer: False
Explanation: The prosecution's firearms expert, John Evans, testified that evidence on the bullet, such as a divot, indicated that a ricochet had occurred.
The firearm used in the shooting was recovered from García Zárate's residence the day after the incident.
Answer: False
Explanation: The firearm was recovered by divers from the bay alongside Pier 14 the day after the incident, not from García Zárate's residence.
The prosecution argued in closing that the gun could have fired accidentally due to its condition.
Answer: False
Explanation: In closing arguments, the prosecution contended that the firearm required the trigger to be pulled to fire, contradicting the notion that it could discharge accidentally due to its condition.
Defense experts suggested the SIG Sauer pistol's design made accidental firing impossible.
Answer: False
Explanation: Defense experts suggested that the SIG Sauer pistol's design, particularly its trigger mechanism, made accidental discharge plausible, not impossible.
What did the defense emphasize about the SIG Sauer P239 handgun?
Answer: It lacked an external safety mechanism and could be fired easily.
Explanation: The defense highlighted that the SIG Sauer P239 lacked an external safety mechanism, making it easier to fire accidentally.
What crucial point did the prosecution's firearms expert, John Evans, testify about the bullet?
Answer: The bullet showed signs of a ricochet.
Explanation: John Evans, the prosecution's firearms expert, testified that evidence on the bullet indicated that a ricochet had occurred.
What was the caliber and model of the handgun used in the shooting?
Answer: .40-caliber SIG Sauer P239.
Explanation: The handgun used in the shooting was a .40-caliber SIG Sauer P239.
San Francisco's sanctuary city policy prevented the city from cooperating with ICE detainers for immigrants facing violent felony charges.
Answer: False
Explanation: San Francisco's sanctuary city policy, specifically the 'Due Process for All' ordinance, did not prevent all cooperation with ICE detainers; it limited cooperation to cases involving current and prior violent felony charges.
The 'Due Process for All' ordinance allowed San Francisco to automatically honor all ICE detainers.
Answer: False
Explanation: The 'Due Process for All' ordinance restricted San Francisco's cooperation with ICE detainers, rather than allowing automatic honoring of all requests.
The San Francisco Sheriff's Department released García Zárate despite an ICE detainer because he had a recent conviction for violent assault.
Answer: False
Explanation: The San Francisco Sheriff's Department released García Zárate due to the city's sanctuary city ordinance, which limited cooperation with ICE detainers unless specific criteria regarding violent felony charges were met, not due to a recent conviction for violent assault.
Sheriff Ross Mirkarimi blamed Kate Steinle for the events leading to García Zárate's release.
Answer: False
Explanation: Sheriff Ross Mirkarimi attributed the circumstances leading to García Zárate's release not to Kate Steinle, but to federal prison and immigration officials.
The 'Due Process for All' ordinance aimed to increase cooperation between San Francisco and federal immigration authorities.
Answer: False
Explanation: The 'Due Process for All' ordinance was designed to restrict, not increase, cooperation between San Francisco and federal immigration authorities regarding ICE detainers.
Why was García Zárate released from county jail despite an ICE detainer?
Answer: San Francisco's sanctuary city policy prevented cooperation with ICE under the circumstances.
Explanation: San Francisco's sanctuary city policy restricted cooperation with ICE detainers unless specific criteria regarding violent felony charges were met, leading to García Zárate's release.
What did Sheriff Ross Mirkarimi attribute the circumstances leading to García Zárate's release to?
Answer: Federal prison and immigration officials.
Explanation: Sheriff Ross Mirkarimi blamed federal prison and immigration officials for the series of events that led to García Zárate's release from custody.
Kate Steinle's death did not significantly influence political discussions regarding immigration policy.
Answer: False
Explanation: Kate Steinle's death significantly influenced political discussions, particularly regarding immigration policy and sanctuary city laws.
"Kate's Law" is a nickname for legislation proposing mandatory minimum sentences for illegal reentry.
Answer: True
Explanation: The term "Kate's Law" refers to proposed legislation aimed at establishing mandatory minimum sentences for individuals who illegally reenter the United States.
Kate Steinle's family actively promoted the use of her name in political campaigns and legislation like "Kate's Law."
Answer: False
Explanation: According to reports, Kate Steinle's family did not wish for her death to become a political controversy and did not coin the term "Kate's Law."
Hillary Clinton supported San Francisco's sanctuary city policy following the incident.
Answer: False
Explanation: Hillary Clinton condemned San Francisco's sanctuary city policy following the incident, stating the city made a mistake by not deporting the accused individual.
The Victims of Immigration Crime Engagement (VOICE) Office was established partly in response to the death of Kate Steinle.
Answer: True
Explanation: The establishment of the Victims of Immigration Crime Engagement (VOICE) Office by President Trump cited the death of Kate Steinle, among other cases, as part of its rationale.
Senator Dianne Feinstein argued that the Sheriff's Department's failure to notify ICE contributed to the tragedy.
Answer: True
Explanation: Senator Dianne Feinstein argued that the Sheriff's Department's failure to notify ICE of García Zárate's release was a contributing factor to the tragedy.
President Trump created the VOICE Office before the Steinle incident occurred.
Answer: False
Explanation: President Trump established the VOICE Office in April 2017, which was after the July 2015 incident involving Kate Steinle.
How did Hillary Clinton comment on San Francisco's policy in relation to the incident?
Answer: She stated the city made a mistake by not deporting the individual.
Explanation: Hillary Clinton stated that San Francisco made a mistake by not deporting the individual whom the federal government believed should be deported.
The Victims of Immigration Crime Engagement (VOICE) Office was established under which administration?
Answer: The Trump Administration.
Explanation: The Victims of Immigration Crime Engagement (VOICE) Office was established by President Trump within the Department of Homeland Security.
What was the ultimate fate of the Senate bill S. 2193, often referred to as "Kate's Law"?
Answer: It failed to pass the Senate due to a filibuster.
Explanation: The Senate bill S. 2193, known as "Kate's Law," failed to pass due to a filibuster, meaning it did not achieve sufficient votes to overcome procedural obstruction.
The Steinle family's lawsuit against the City of San Francisco was successful and resulted in a settlement.
Answer: False
Explanation: The Steinle family's lawsuit against the City of San Francisco was ultimately dismissed, and this decision was upheld on appeal.
The Steinle family's lawsuit against ICE was dismissed by a federal judge.
Answer: True
Explanation: A federal judge, Magistrate Judge Joseph C. Spero, dismissed the Steinle family's lawsuit against ICE.
What was the outcome of the Steinle family's lawsuit against the City of San Francisco?
Answer: The lawsuit was dismissed and the decision was upheld on appeal.
Explanation: The Steinle family's lawsuit against the City of San Francisco was ultimately dismissed, and this decision was upheld on appeal.