Enter a player name to begin or load your saved progress.
Were regions with a non-Christian majority, such as Mountain Province, initially excluded from representation in the lower house of the Philippine Legislature upon its establishment in 1907?
Answer: True
Explanation: Upon the establishment of the Philippine Legislature in 1907, areas characterized by a non-Christian majority, including Mountain Province, were initially excluded from representation in the lower house.
Prior to 1969, did the legislative representation for the undivided Mountain Province encompass areas that are now constituent parts of Benguet, Ifugao, and Kalinga?
Answer: True
Explanation: Before 1969, the legislative representation for the undivided Mountain Province included territories that subsequently formed the provinces of Benguet, Ifugao, and Kalinga, among others.
Following 1917, were the non-Christian majority areas collectively represented by two senators appointed by the Governor-General, constituting the 12th senatorial district?
Answer: True
Explanation: After 1917, the non-Christian majority areas were represented in the upper house by two senators appointed by the Governor-General, forming the 12th senatorial district as stipulated by the Revised Administrative Code.
Between 1917 and 1935, was the Mountain Province, along with Baguio City, represented by three assembly members elected through popular vote?
Answer: False
Explanation: From 1917 to 1935, the Mountain Province and Baguio City were represented by three assembly members, but these representatives were appointed by the Governor-General, not elected by popular vote.
Were appointed representatives for the Mountain Province during the American colonial period mandated to be residents of the province they represented?
Answer: False
Explanation: Appointed representatives for the Mountain Province during the American colonial period were not required to be residents of the province; some resided in other regions, such as Manila or Rizal.
Did Act No. 4203, enacted in 1935, permit voters in areas transferred from Mountain Province to elect representatives within their new provincial jurisdictions?
Answer: True
Explanation: Act No. 4203, enacted in 1935, facilitated the election of representatives by voters in municipalities and municipal districts previously transferred from Mountain Province to other provinces like Ilocos Sur, La Union, and Cagayan.
Did Act No. 4203, enacted in 1935, divide the Mountain Province into three districts and establish representation through popular election?
Answer: True
Explanation: Act No. 4203, enacted in 1935, restructured representation by dividing the province into three districts and making election by popular vote the method of representation to the National Assembly.
Under Act No. 4203, was the western portion of the former Bontoc sub-province incorporated into the second district?
Answer: False
Explanation: Under Act No. 4203, the western portion of the former Bontoc sub-province, which included areas from the abolished Lepanto sub-province, was represented in the third district, not the second.
During the Japanese occupation, was the sole representative for Mountain Province in the National Assembly the provincial governor serving ex officio?
Answer: False
Explanation: During the Japanese occupation, Mountain Province had two delegates to the National Assembly: one was the provincial governor serving ex officio, and the other was elected by members of KALIBAPI. Baguio was represented separately.
Did Act No. 1964, enacted in 1909, render Baguio an independent city while requiring it to vote with Mountain Province for congressional representation?
Answer: True
Explanation: Act No. 1964 established Baguio as an independent city, separating it from provincial governance, but it continued to vote as part of Mountain Province specifically for congressional representation.
In 1920, were areas transferred from Mountain Province to Ilocos Sur and La Union, with the Lepanto sub-province being annexed to Benguet?
Answer: False
Explanation: In 1920, areas were transferred from Mountain Province to Ilocos Sur and La Union, and the Lepanto sub-province was abolished and its territories annexed to the Bontoc sub-province, not Benguet.
Is the Philippine Autonomy Act of 1916 commonly referred to as the Jones Law?
Answer: True
Explanation: The Philippine Autonomy Act, enacted by the United States Congress in 1916, is widely known as the Jones Law.
Which legislative act, enacted by the U.S. Congress in 1916, extended representation to areas such as the Mountain Province that were previously excluded?
Answer: The Philippine Autonomy Act
Explanation: The Philippine Autonomy Act of 1916, also known as the Jones Law, was instrumental in extending legislative representation to areas previously excluded, including the non-Christian majority regions like Mountain Province.
How were the non-Christian majority areas represented in the upper house of the Philippine Legislature subsequent to 1917?
Answer: Through two senators appointed by the Governor-General, forming the 12th senatorial district.
Explanation: Following 1917, the non-Christian majority areas were collectively represented in the upper house by two senators appointed by the Governor-General, constituting the 12th senatorial district.
What was a distinctive characteristic of the appointed representatives for Mountain Province between 1917 and 1935?
Answer: They were not necessarily residents of the areas they represented.
Explanation: A notable aspect of the appointed representatives for Mountain Province between 1917 and 1935 was that their residency was not restricted to the areas they represented; some resided in Manila or Rizal.
Which legislative Act, enacted in 1935, significantly altered Mountain Province's representation by making it elective and dividing it into three districts?
Answer: Act No. 4203
Explanation: Act No. 4203, passed in 1935, transitioned representation to an elective system based on popular vote and divided the province into three districts for the National Assembly.
During the Japanese occupation and the Second Philippine Republic, how was one of the two representatives for Mountain Province selected?
Answer: Elected by members of KALIBAPI.
Explanation: During the Japanese occupation, one of the two representatives for Mountain Province was elected by members of KALIBAPI, the ruling political party of the Second Philippine Republic.
According to the source, how was the western part of the former Lepanto sub-province represented following the implementation of Act No. 4203?
Answer: It was included in the 3rd District.
Explanation: Following Act No. 4203, the western portion of the former Lepanto sub-province was incorporated into the third district of the Mountain Province.
Did the 1st District of the undivided Mountain Province include the Sub-province of Benguet?
Answer: False
Explanation: The 1st District of the undivided Mountain Province comprised Apayao, Kalinga, and parts of Bontoc; Benguet was part of the 2nd District.
Did the 2nd District of the undivided Mountain Province encompass both the city of Baguio and the Sub-province of Benguet?
Answer: True
Explanation: The 2nd District of the undivided Mountain Province included the independent city of Baguio and the Sub-province of Benguet.
Did Felipe E. Jose represent the 2nd District of the undivided Mountain Province in the 1st National Assembly (1935-1938)?
Answer: True
Explanation: Felipe E. Jose served as the representative for the 2nd District of the undivided Mountain Province during the 1st National Assembly, from 1935 to 1938.
Did the 3rd District of the undivided Mountain Province include the Sub-province of Ifugao and portions of the Bontoc sub-province?
Answer: True
Explanation: The 3rd District of the undivided Mountain Province comprised the Sub-province of Ifugao and specific areas of the Sub-province of Bontoc.
Did George K. Tait represent the 3rd District of the undivided Mountain Province in the 1st National Assembly?
Answer: True
Explanation: George K. Tait served as the representative for the 3rd District of the undivided Mountain Province during the 1st National Assembly (1935-1938).
Did the 'At-Large' district for Mountain Province between 1917 and 1935 exclude the city of Baguio?
Answer: False
Explanation: The 'At-Large' district for Mountain Province between 1917 and 1935 included the city of Baguio, along with other sub-provinces and territories.
Which geographical areas constituted the 1st District of the undivided Mountain Province?
Answer: Apayao, Kalinga, and parts of Bontoc
Explanation: The 1st District of the undivided Mountain Province encompassed the Sub-province of Apayao, the Sub-province of Kalinga, and specific portions of the Sub-province of Bontoc.
Who served as the representative for the 2nd District of the undivided Mountain Province in the 1st National Assembly (1935-1938)?
Answer: Felipe E. Jose
Explanation: Felipe E. Jose represented the 2nd District of the undivided Mountain Province in the 1st National Assembly from 1935 to 1938.
Which of the following was NOT part of the 'At-Large' district for Mountain Province between 1917 and 1935?
Answer: The newly formed Province of Mountain Province in 1966
Explanation: The 'At-Large' district designation applied to the period between 1917 and 1935; the province of Mountain Province as reorganized in 1966 falls outside this historical context.
What legislative change occurred in 1920 concerning the territorial composition of Mountain Province's districts?
Answer: The sub-province of Lepanto was abolished and its areas annexed to Bontoc.
Explanation: In 1920, legislative changes included the abolition of the Lepanto sub-province, with its territories being annexed to the Bontoc sub-province, alongside other territorial adjustments.
What significant legislative action did Republic Act No. 4695, enacted in 1966, undertake concerning Mountain Province?
Answer: Transformed the sub-province of Bontoc into a full province named Mountain Province.
Explanation: Republic Act No. 4695, enacted on June 18, 1966, formally transformed the sub-province of Bontoc into a full province retaining the name 'Mountain Province'.
In what year did the newly constituted Mountain Province commence electing its own single representative?
Answer: 1969
Explanation: Following the reorganization under Republic Act No. 4695, the reduced Mountain Province began electing its lone representative in 1969.
Did the Philippine Independence Act of 1946 grant legislative representation to the non-Christian majority areas of the Philippines?
Answer: False
Explanation: The Philippine Independence Act of 1946 marked the Philippines' independence. Representation for non-Christian majority areas was primarily established earlier, notably by the Philippine Autonomy Act of 1916.
Did Republic Act No. 4695, enacted in 1966, establish the current lone congressional district for Mountain Province?
Answer: False
Explanation: Republic Act No. 4695 in 1966 reorganized the province by making Bontoc a full province named Mountain Province. The establishment of the lone congressional district structure was later formalized by the 1987 Constitution.
Did the reduced Mountain Province commence electing its own lone representative in 1969?
Answer: True
Explanation: Following the reorganization under Republic Act No. 4695, the Mountain Province began electing its lone representative in 1969.
Does Mountain Province currently comprise multiple congressional districts representing its population in the Philippine House of Representatives?
Answer: False
Explanation: Mountain Province currently constitutes a single, lone congressional district, represented by one member in the Philippine House of Representatives.
Was the legislative representation of Mountain Province exclusively confined to the former sub-province of Bontoc starting in 1979?
Answer: False
Explanation: The legislative representation of Mountain Province was not confined solely to the former sub-province of Bontoc starting in 1979. The province has maintained its distinct representation, evolving into a lone district.
Did the 1987 Constitution formally establish Mountain Province as a lone congressional district?
Answer: True
Explanation: The Constitution promulgated in 1987 established Mountain Province as a lone congressional district, solidifying its current representative structure.
According to the 2015 census data, did the population of Mountain Province's lone district exceed 200,000 individuals?
Answer: False
Explanation: The 2015 census indicated that the population of Mountain Province's lone district was 154,590, which is below the 200,000 threshold.
Was Alfredo G. Lamen the inaugural representative for Mountain Province's lone district following its re-establishment in 1969?
Answer: True
Explanation: Alfredo G. Lamen served as the first representative for the lone district of Mountain Province in the 7th Congress, commencing in 1969.
Did Victor S. Dominguez represent Mountain Province for three consecutive terms, commencing in 1987?
Answer: True
Explanation: Victor S. Dominguez represented Mountain Province for three successive terms, covering the 8th through the 10th Congresses, beginning in 1987.
Was Josephine D. Dominguez the representative for Mountain Province during the 12th Congress?
Answer: False
Explanation: Josephine D. Dominguez served as the representative for Mountain Province during the 11th Congress, not the 12th.
Did Victor S. Dominguez represent Mountain Province in the 13th Congress and a portion of the 14th Congress before his passing?
Answer: True
Explanation: Victor S. Dominguez represented Mountain Province during the 13th Congress and the initial part of the 14th Congress before his death occurred.
Did Maximo B. Dalog represent Mountain Province in the 15th and 16th Congresses?
Answer: True
Explanation: Maximo B. Dalog served as the representative for Mountain Province during the 15th and 16th Congresses.
Was Maximo Y. Dalog Jr. the representative for Mountain Province in the 17th Congress, succeeding his father?
Answer: False
Explanation: Maximo B. Dalog represented Mountain Province in the 17th Congress. His son, Maximo Y. Dalog Jr., represented the province in the 18th Congress.
Is Maximo Y. Dalog Jr. the current representative for Mountain Province in the 19th Congress?
Answer: True
Explanation: Maximo Y. Dalog Jr. is the current representative for Mountain Province, serving in the 19th Congress.
What is the current legislative status of Mountain Province within the House of Representatives?
Answer: It has a lone congressional district.
Explanation: Mountain Province currently holds the status of a lone congressional district, meaning it is represented by a single member in the House of Representatives.
Which legislative body did Mountain Province send one representative to, elected at-large in 1984?
Answer: The Regular Batasang Pambansa
Explanation: In 1984, Mountain Province elected one representative at-large to the Regular Batasang Pambansa, during a period when it was part of Region I for representation purposes.
Who served as the representative for Mountain Province for three consecutive terms, spanning the 8th to the 10th Congress?
Answer: Victor S. Dominguez
Explanation: Victor S. Dominguez represented Mountain Province for three consecutive terms, from the 8th Congress (1987-1992) through the 10th Congress (1995-1998).
What transpired regarding Victor S. Dominguez's seat during the latter part of the 14th Congress?
Answer: His seat became vacant after his death.
Explanation: Victor S. Dominguez's seat for Mountain Province became vacant during the latter part of the 14th Congress following his death on February 8, 2008.
Who represented Mountain Province in the 15th and 16th Congresses?
Answer: Maximo B. Dalog
Explanation: Maximo B. Dalog served as the representative for Mountain Province during the 15th and 16th Congresses.
Who is the current representative for Mountain Province in the 19th Congress?
Answer: Maximo Y. Dalog Jr.
Explanation: Maximo Y. Dalog Jr. currently holds the position of representative for Mountain Province in the 19th Congress.
What was the population of Mountain Province's lone district based on the 2015 census?
Answer: 154,590
Explanation: According to the 2015 census, the population count for Mountain Province's lone congressional district was recorded as 154,590.
From 1978 to 1984, did Mountain Province elect one representative at-large to the National Assembly?
Answer: False
Explanation: From 1978 to 1984, Mountain Province was part of Region I for representation and elected one representative at-large to the Regular Batasang Pambansa in 1984, not the National Assembly.
Was the Batasang Pambansa the legislative body functioning during the Commonwealth period (1935-1946)?
Answer: False
Explanation: The legislative body during the Commonwealth period (1935-1946) was the National Assembly. The Batasang Pambansa served as the legislature during later periods under the 1973 Constitution.
Was the Batasang Pambansa the legislative body during the Commonwealth period (1935-1946)?
Answer: False
Explanation: The National Assembly served as the legislative body during the Commonwealth period (1935-1946). The Batasang Pambansa was established later under the 1973 Constitution.
In the context of the Philippine Congress, what does the term 'legislative district' signify?
Answer: A geographical area entitled to representation in the House of Representatives.
Explanation: A legislative district refers to a defined geographical area within the Philippines that is allocated representation in the House of Representatives, with each district typically electing one representative.
Who possessed the authority to appoint legislators for certain Philippine territories during the American colonial period, as indicated by the source?
Answer: The Governor-General of the Philippines
Explanation: During the American colonial era, the Governor-General of the Philippines held the power to appoint legislators, particularly for regions like Mountain Province that were initially excluded from direct popular elections.
What was the primary objective of the Revised Administrative Code of 1917?
Answer: To organize the administrative structure and representation of the Philippines.
Explanation: The Revised Administrative Code of 1917 served as a foundational legislation that organized the administrative framework of the Philippines, including provisions for legislative representation across various territories.
What was the nature of the National Assembly during the Commonwealth period of the Philippines?
Answer: It was a unicameral legislative body.
Explanation: The National Assembly, functioning during the Commonwealth period (1935-1946), was a unicameral legislative body, comprising a single chamber.
What was the Batasang Pambansa?
Answer: A unicameral legislature established under the 1973 Constitution.
Explanation: The Batasang Pambansa was the national legislature of the Philippines during specific periods, notably functioning as a unicameral body under the 1973 Constitution.