Enter a player name to begin or load your saved progress.
The Delhi Sultanate maintained its existence for precisely 300 years, spanning from 1206 to 1506.
Answer: False
Explanation: The Delhi Sultanate existed for a total of 320 years, from its formation on June 25, 1206, until its abolition on April 21, 1526.
The Sultan of Delhi exercised supreme political and military authority as the absolute monarch of the Delhi Sultanate.
Answer: True
Explanation: The Sultan of Delhi was indeed the absolute monarch, possessing supreme political and military authority over the vast territories of the Sultanate.
The Delhi Sultanate was governed by four distinct dynasties, all of which were closely related by consanguinity.
Answer: False
Explanation: The Delhi Sultanate was ruled by five distinct and largely unrelated dynasties, not four closely related ones.
The geographical dominion of the Delhi Sultanate was primarily confined to the territory of modern-day India.
Answer: False
Explanation: The Delhi Sultanate extended over large parts of the Indian subcontinent, including significant territories of modern-day India, Pakistan, and Bangladesh.
The Sultans of Delhi exclusively employed the title 'Sultan' and refrained from adopting any other appellations.
Answer: False
Explanation: The Sultans of Delhi adopted various titles, including Sultan, Sultan of Sultans, Shah, Ghazi, Khan, Sikander, and Malik.
Delhi served as the initial capital city of the Delhi Sultanate and maintained its status as the exclusive capital throughout the Sultanate's entire duration.
Answer: False
Explanation: The initial capital of the Delhi Sultanate was Lahore, and the capital city shifted multiple times throughout its history, including to Badayun, Delhi, Daulatabad, and Agra.
The succession protocol for the Sultans of Delhi was exclusively merit-based, devoid of any hereditary elements.
Answer: False
Explanation: The method of succession for the Sultans of Delhi was hereditary, with power typically passed down within the ruling family.
The Khalji dynasty exercised governance over the Delhi Sultanate for the most extended duration among all five dynastic lines.
Answer: False
Explanation: The Tughluq dynasty (1320-1414) ruled for 94 years, making it one of the longest-reigning dynasties, while the Khalji dynasty (1290-1320) ruled for 30 years.
The Lodi dynasty was the second dynastic line to govern the Delhi Sultanate.
Answer: False
Explanation: The Lodi dynasty was the fifth and final dynasty to rule the Delhi Sultanate, succeeding the Sayyid dynasty.
What was the total chronological span of the Delhi Sultanate's existence?
Answer: 320 years
Explanation: The Delhi Sultanate existed for a total of 320 years, from its formation on June 25, 1206, until its abolition on April 21, 1526.
Which of the following appellations was NOT adopted by the Sultans of Delhi?
Answer: Caliph
Explanation: The Sultans of Delhi adopted titles such as Sultan, Sultan of Sultans, Shah, Ghazi, Khan, Sikander, and Malik, but 'Caliph' is not listed among them.
Which of the following contemporary nations was NOT encompassed within the geographical extent of the Delhi Sultanate?
Answer: Afghanistan
Explanation: The Delhi Sultanate stretched over large parts of the Indian subcontinent, encompassing significant territories of modern-day India, Pakistan, and Bangladesh. Afghanistan is not listed as part of its extent.
What city served as the initial capital of the Delhi Sultanate?
Answer: Lahore
Explanation: The initial capital of the Delhi Sultanate was Lahore (1206–1210).
Which dynasty succeeded the Mamluk dynasty in governing the Delhi Sultanate?
Answer: Khalji dynasty
Explanation: The five dynasties ruled in succession: Mamluk (1206–1290), Khalji (1290–1320), Tughlaq (1320–1414), Sayyid (1414–1451), and Lodi (1451–1526). Thus, the Khalji dynasty immediately followed the Mamluk dynasty.
Which dynastic line was the final one to govern the Delhi Sultanate?
Answer: Lodi dynasty
Explanation: The Lodi dynasty (1451-1526) was the last of the five dynasties to rule the Delhi Sultanate.
Which of the following urban centers functioned as the capital of the Delhi Sultanate during the period of 1327–1334?
Answer: Daulatabad
Explanation: The primary residence of the Sultans shifted to Daulatabad from 1327–1334.
Qutb ud-Din Aibak served as the inaugural monarch of the Delhi Sultanate, commencing his reign in 1206.
Answer: True
Explanation: Qutb ud-Din Aibak is recognized as the first monarch of the Delhi Sultanate, with his reign beginning on June 25, 1206.
The Mamluk dynasty constituted the first of the five dynastic lines to govern the Delhi Sultanate, ruling from 1206 to 1290.
Answer: True
Explanation: The Mamluk dynasty ruled the Delhi Sultanate from 1206 to 1290, establishing itself as the first of the five major dynasties.
Aram Shah succeeded Qutb ud-Din Aibak and maintained a lengthy reign exceeding two decades.
Answer: False
Explanation: Aram Shah succeeded Qutb ud-Din Aibak but reigned for a relatively short period, from December 1210 to June 1211.
Shams ud-Din Iltutmish was the son-in-law of Qutb ud-Din Aibak.
Answer: True
Explanation: Shams ud-Din Iltutmish was indeed the son-in-law of Qutb ud-Din Aibak, a marital alliance that strengthened his political legitimacy.
Jalalat ud-Din Razia, the first female Sultan of Delhi, was a member of the Khalji dynasty.
Answer: False
Explanation: Jalalat ud-Din Razia was the first female Sultan of Delhi, but she belonged to the Mamluk dynasty, not the Khalji dynasty.
Ghiyas ud-Din Balban, a Turkish noble, served in the court of Iltutmish prior to his ascension as Sultan.
Answer: True
Explanation: Ghiyas ud-Din Balban was a Turkish noble who served in the court of Iltutmish before he became Sultan himself, demonstrating a rise through the ranks of the Mamluk administration.
Muiz ud-Din Qaiqabad was the son of Ghiyas ud-Din Balban.
Answer: False
Explanation: Muiz ud-Din Qaiqabad was the grandson of Ghiyas ud-Din Balban, not his son.
Who is historically recognized as the inaugural monarch of the Delhi Sultanate?
Answer: Qutb ud-Din Aibak
Explanation: Qutb ud-Din Aibak is recognized as the first monarch of the Delhi Sultanate, beginning his reign on June 25, 1206.
Identify the first female Sultan to rule Delhi.
Answer: Razia Sultan
Explanation: Jalalat ud-Din Razia, also known as Razia Sultan, was the first female Sultan of Delhi, ruling from November 1236 to April 20, 1240.
What was the familial relationship connecting Shams ud-Din Iltutmish and Qutb ud-Din Aibak?
Answer: Son-in-law
Explanation: Shams ud-Din Iltutmish was the son-in-law of Qutb ud-Din Aibak.
Which Mamluk Sultan, prior to his ascension, served as a Turkish noble in the court of Iltutmish?
Answer: Ghiyas ud-Din Balban
Explanation: Ghiyas ud-Din Balban was a Turkish noble who served in the court of Iltutmish before becoming Sultan himself.
Identify the final recognized ruler of the Mamluk dynasty.
Answer: Shams ud-Din Kayumars
Explanation: Shams ud-Din Kayumars, the son of Qaiqabad, was the last ruler of the Mamluk dynasty.
Which descendant of Iltutmish, specifically his grandson, reigned from June 10, 1246, to February 18, 1266?
Answer: Nasir ud-Din Mahmud I
Explanation: Nasir ud-Din Mahmud I was the grandson of Iltutmish, and he ruled from June 10, 1246, to February 18, 1266.
Jalal ud-Din Khalji was the progenitor of the Khalji dynasty.
Answer: True
Explanation: Jalal ud-Din Khalji founded the Khalji dynasty, reigning from June 13, 1290, until his death on July 19, 1296.
Ala ud-Din Khalji was the son of Jalal ud-Din Khalji and directly succeeded him to the throne.
Answer: False
Explanation: Ala ud-Din Khalji was the nephew of Jalal ud-Din Khalji, whom he succeeded. There was also a brief titular reign by Rukn ud-Din Ibrahim between them.
Nasir ud-Din Khusrau founded a new dynastic line subsequent to the Khalji dynasty, which endured for multiple decades.
Answer: False
Explanation: Nasir ud-Din Khusrau ruled for a very short period (July 10 to September 5, 1320) and did not establish a new dynasty, marking a brief interregnum.
Who was the founder of the Khalji dynasty?
Answer: Jalal ud-Din Khalji
Explanation: Jalal ud-Din Khalji founded the Khalji dynasty, reigning from June 13, 1290.
Describe the familial relationship between Ala ud-Din Khalji and Jalal ud-Din Khalji.
Answer: Nephew
Explanation: Ala ud-Din Khalji was the nephew of Jalal ud-Din Khalji, whom he succeeded.
Which ruler, succeeding the Khalji dynasty, failed to establish a new dynastic line and instead marked a brief interregnum?
Answer: Nasir ud-Din Khusrau
Explanation: Nasir ud-Din Khusrau ruled for a short period and did not establish a dynasty, marking a brief interregnum between the Khalji and Tughluq dynasties.
The Tughluq dynasty was inaugurated by Ghiyas ud-Din Tughluq I.
Answer: True
Explanation: Ghiyas ud-Din Tughluq I was the founder and inaugural ruler of the Tughluq dynasty, reigning from September 8, 1320.
Muhammad II bin Tughluq was the son-in-law of Ghiyath al-Din Tughluq I.
Answer: False
Explanation: Muhammad II bin Tughluq was the son of Ghiyath al-Din Tughluq I, not his son-in-law.
Firuz III Shah Tughluq was the son-in-law of Ghiyath al-Din Tughluq I.
Answer: True
Explanation: Firuz III Shah Tughluq was indeed the son-in-law of Ghiyath al-Din Tughluq I, reigning from March 23, 1351.
Nasir ud-Din Nusrat was a legitimate monarch who governed peacefully during the Tughluq dynasty.
Answer: False
Explanation: Nasir ud-Din Nusrat was an anti-king and claimant to the throne, serving as a sub-ruler during a period of internal conflict within the Tughluq dynasty, not a legitimate or peaceful ruler.
Ala ud-Din Sikandar I was the son of Nasir ud-Din Muhammad Shah III.
Answer: True
Explanation: Ala ud-Din Sikandar I was indeed the son of Nasir ud-Din Muhammad Shah III and had a brief reign in 1394.
Which dynastic line governed the Delhi Sultanate during the period of 1320 to 1414?
Answer: Tughluq dynasty
Explanation: The Tughluq dynasty ruled the Delhi Sultanate from 1320 to 1414.
Identify the inaugural ruler of the Tughluq dynasty.
Answer: Ghiyas ud-Din Tughluq I
Explanation: Ghiyas ud-Din Tughluq I was the founder and inaugural ruler of the Tughluq dynasty.
What was the familial relationship between Muhammad II bin Tughluq and Ghiyath al-Din Tughluq I?
Answer: Son
Explanation: Muhammad II bin Tughluq was the son of Ghiyath al-Din Tughluq I.
Firuz III Shah Tughluq was related to Ghiyath al-Din Tughluq I in what familial capacity?
Answer: Son-in-law
Explanation: Firuz III Shah Tughluq was the son-in-law of Ghiyath al-Din Tughluq I.
During which dynastic period did Nasir ud-Din Nusrat function as an anti-king and claimant to the throne?
Answer: Tughluq dynasty
Explanation: Nasir ud-Din Nusrat served as an anti-king and claimant to the throne during a period of internal conflict within the Tughluq dynasty.
The image presented in the infobox portrays the court of which specific Tughluq Sultan?
Answer: Muhammad II bin Tughluq
Explanation: The image in the infobox depicts the court of Muhammad bin Tughluq, who reigned from February 1, 1325, to March 20, 1351.
Identify the two Tughluq rulers who were grandsons of Firuz Shah Tughlaq.
Answer: Ghiyas ud-Din Tughluq II and Abu Bakr Shah
Explanation: Ghiyas ud-Din Tughluq II and Abu Bakr Shah were both grandsons of Firuz Shah Tughlaq.
Ibrahim Khan Lodi was the final monarch of the Delhi Sultanate, and his reign concluded in 1526.
Answer: True
Explanation: Ibrahim Khan Lodi was indeed the last monarch of the Delhi Sultanate, and his reign, along with the Sultanate itself, ended on April 21, 1526.
The Sayyid dynasty was established by Khizr Khan and governed from 1414 to 1451.
Answer: True
Explanation: Khizr Khan was the founder of the Sayyid dynasty, which held power in the Delhi Sultanate from 1414 to 1451.
Muhammad Shah IV was the son of Khizr Khan and succeeded him as Sultan.
Answer: False
Explanation: Muhammad Shah IV was the grandson of Khizr Khan. Muiz ud-Din Mubarak II, Khizr Khan's son, succeeded him.
Ala ud-Din Alam served as the ultimate ruler of the Sayyid dynasty.
Answer: True
Explanation: Ala ud-Din Alam was indeed the final ruler of the Sayyid dynasty, reigning from January 1, 1445, to April 19, 1451.
Bahlul Khan Lodi was the inaugural Sultan of the Lodi dynasty.
Answer: True
Explanation: Bahlul Khan Lodi was the first Sultan of the Lodi dynasty, reigning from April 19, 1451.
Sikandar II Khan Lodi was the grandson of Bahlul Khan Lodi.
Answer: False
Explanation: Sikandar II Khan Lodi was the son of Bahlul Khan Lodi, whom he succeeded.
Ibrahim Khan Lodi was the son of Sikandar Lodi and the final ruler of the Delhi Sultanate.
Answer: True
Explanation: Ibrahim Khan Lodi was the son of Sikandar Lodi and served as the last ruler of both the Lodi dynasty and the Delhi Sultanate, dying on April 21, 1526.
Identify the founder of the Sayyid dynasty.
Answer: Khizr Khan
Explanation: Khizr Khan was the founder of the Sayyid dynasty, reigning from May 28, 1414.
What was the genealogical relationship of Muhammad Shah IV within the Sayyid dynasty?
Answer: Grandson of Khizr Khan
Explanation: Muhammad Shah IV was the grandson of Khizr Khan, reigning from February 1434.
Identify the ultimate ruler of the Sayyid dynasty.
Answer: Ala ud-Din Alam
Explanation: Ala ud-Din Alam was the final ruler of the Sayyid dynasty, reigning from January 1, 1445.
Identify the inaugural Sultan of the Lodi dynasty.
Answer: Bahlul Khan Lodi
Explanation: Bahlul Khan Lodi was the first Sultan of the Lodi dynasty, reigning from April 19, 1451.
What was the familial relationship between Sikandar II Khan Lodi and Bahlul Khan Lodi?
Answer: Son
Explanation: Sikandar II Khan Lodi was the son of Bahlul Khan Lodi, whom he succeeded.
Muiz ud-Din Mubarak II, the second ruler of the Sayyid dynasty, bore what familial relationship to Khizr Khan?
Answer: Son
Explanation: Muiz ud-Din Mubarak II was the son of Khizr Khan, and he succeeded his father.
Ibrahim Khan Lodi was the son of which specific Lodi Sultan?
Answer: Sikandar II Khan Lodi
Explanation: Ibrahim Khan Lodi was the son of Sikandar Lodi, and he was the last ruler of the Lodi dynasty.
Qutb ud-Din Aibak was born in the year 1200.
Answer: False
Explanation: Qutb ud-Din Aibak, the first Sultan of Delhi, was born in 1150.
Razia Sultan was born in 1205 and was the daughter of Iltutmish.
Answer: True
Explanation: Jalalat ud-Din Razia, or Razia Sultan, was born in 1205 and was indeed the daughter of Iltutmish.
Alauddin Khalji was born in 1266 and emerged as a significant ruler of the Khalji dynasty.
Answer: True
Explanation: Alauddin Khalji, a prominent ruler of the Khalji dynasty, was born in 1266 and reigned from July 19, 1296, to January 4, 1316.
Firuz III Shah Tughluq was born in 1309.
Answer: True
Explanation: Firuz III Shah Tughluq, a prominent ruler of the Tughluq dynasty, was born in 1309.
In what specific year was Qutb ud-Din Aibak born?
Answer: 1150
Explanation: Qutb ud-Din Aibak, the first Sultan of Delhi, was born in 1150.
On what date did Ibrahim Khan Lodi, the final Sultan of Delhi, meet his demise?
Answer: April 21, 1526
Explanation: Ibrahim Khan Lodi, the last Sultan of Delhi, died on April 21, 1526, marking the end of the Delhi Sultanate.
What was the birth year of Razia Sultan?
Answer: 1205
Explanation: Jalalat ud-Din Razia, or Razia Sultan, was born in 1205.
In what year was Alauddin Khalji born?
Answer: 1266
Explanation: Alauddin Khalji, a significant ruler of the Khalji dynasty, was born in 1266.
In what year was Bahlul Khan Lodi, the founder of the Lodi dynasty, born?
Answer: 1420
Explanation: Bahlul Khan Lodi, the founder of the Lodi dynasty, was born in 1420.