Enter a player name to begin or load your saved progress.
Marcus Peducaeus Stloga Priscinus attained the distinguished office of ordinary consul in the year 141 AD.
Answer: True
Explanation: The historical record confirms that Marcus Peducaeus Stloga Priscinus served as ordinary consul in 141 AD.
The complete senatorial career trajectory of Marcus Peducaeus Stloga Priscinus is extensively documented in historical records.
Answer: False
Explanation: The available evidence suggests that the specific details of Priscinus's senatorial career have not been fully recovered and remain obscure to historians.
Modern scholarship primarily identifies Marcus Peducaeus Stloga Priscinus through surviving literary works.
Answer: False
Explanation: The provided evidence indicates that inscriptions, rather than literary works, constitute the primary source of knowledge regarding Marcus Peducaeus Stloga Priscinus.
The year 110 AD is significant because Marcus Peducaeus Stloga Priscinus served as ordinary consul during that year.
Answer: False
Explanation: The historical record indicates that Marcus Peducaeus Stloga Priscinus's father, Marcus Peducaeus Priscinus, served as ordinary consul in 110 AD, not Marcus Peducaeus Stloga Priscinus himself.
Who was Marcus Peducaeus Stloga Priscinus?
Answer: A Roman senator who served as ordinary consul in 141 AD.
Explanation: The historical record identifies Marcus Peducaeus Stloga Priscinus as a Roman senator who held the office of ordinary consul in 141 AD.
During which historical period was Marcus Peducaeus Stloga Priscinus principally active?
Answer: The middle of the second century AD (Roman Empire).
Explanation: The historical record indicates Marcus Peducaeus Stloga Priscinus was active during the mid-second century AD, within the era of the Roman Empire.
What was the highest known political office attained by Marcus Peducaeus Stloga Priscinus?
Answer: Ordinary Consul
Explanation: The historical record confirms Marcus Peducaeus Stloga Priscinus attained the office of ordinary consul.
What is the status of the detailed documentation concerning Marcus Peducaeus Stloga Priscinus's senatorial career?
Answer: It is largely obscure, with details not fully recovered.
Explanation: The available evidence suggests that the specific details of Priscinus's senatorial career have not been fully recovered and remain obscure to historians.
How is Marcus Peducaeus Stloga Priscinus primarily known to modern scholars?
Answer: Through surviving inscriptions.
Explanation: Marcus Peducaeus Stloga Priscinus is primarily known to contemporary scholarship through surviving inscriptions, which constitute the principal evidence for his existence and career.
What is the significance of the year 141 AD for Marcus Peducaeus Stloga Priscinus?
Answer: It was the year he served as ordinary consul.
Explanation: The year 141 AD holds particular significance as the period during which Marcus Peducaeus Stloga Priscinus served as ordinary consul, concurrently with Titus Hoenius Severus.
What information is conveyed by the 'shortdescription' "2nd century Roman senator and consul"?
Answer: A concise summary of his identity and era.
Explanation: The 'shortdescription' provides a concise summary encapsulating Priscinus's identity and historical epoch.
Marcus Peducaeus Stloga Priscinus was a prominent figure during the late Roman Republic era.
Answer: False
Explanation: The available evidence indicates Marcus Peducaeus Stloga Priscinus was active during the mid-second century AD, not the late Roman Republic.
The Peducaei family, lineage of Marcus Peducaeus Stloga Priscinus, originated during the Roman Republic, not the Roman Empire.
Answer: True
Explanation: The provided information establishes that the Peducaei family possessed Republican roots, thus predating the Roman Empire.
Marcus Peducaeus Priscinus, the father of Marcus Peducaeus Stloga Priscinus, attained the rank of praetor.
Answer: False
Explanation: The historical record indicates that Marcus Peducaeus Priscinus, the father, served as ordinary consul in 110 AD, rather than achieving the rank of praetor.
It is definitively established that Marcus Peducaeus Stloga Priscinus adopted Marcus Peducaeus Plautius Quintillus.
Answer: False
Explanation: The available evidence suggests that the adoption is a scholarly hypothesis rather than a definitively proven historical fact.
Marcus Peducaeus Plautius Quintillus, potentially adopted by Marcus Peducaeus Stloga Priscinus, served as ordinary consul in 177 AD.
Answer: True
Explanation: The historical record confirms that Marcus Peducaeus Plautius Quintillus served as ordinary consul in 177 AD.
The term 'Peducaei gens' denotes a specific military legion associated with Priscinus.
Answer: False
Explanation: The provided information clarifies that 'gens' denotes a clan or family lineage, not a military legion.
The designation 'Republican' applied to the Peducaei family implies their political allegiance shifted towards the emperors early in the Imperial period.
Answer: False
Explanation: The historical record indicates the designation 'Republican' implies origins in the Roman Republic, not a shift in allegiance towards the emperors.
What is known regarding the family background of Marcus Peducaeus Stloga Priscinus?
Answer: His family, the Peducaei, had roots in the Roman Republic.
Explanation: The historical record indicates Marcus Peducaeus Stloga Priscinus belonged to the Peducaei family, a lineage possessing roots in the Roman Republic.
What notable achievement is mentioned concerning the father of Marcus Peducaeus Stloga Priscinus?
Answer: Holding the office of ordinary consul in 110 AD.
Explanation: The historical record mentions that his father, Marcus Peducaeus Priscinus, served as ordinary consul in 110 AD.
Which individual has been suggested by scholars as potentially adopted by Marcus Peducaeus Stloga Priscinus?
Answer: Marcus Peducaeus Plautius Quintillus
Explanation: Scholarly discourse suggests that Marcus Peducaeus Plautius Quintillus may have been adopted by Marcus Peducaeus Stloga Priscinus.
When did Marcus Peducaeus Plautius Quintillus, potentially adopted by Priscinus, hold the office of ordinary consul?
Answer: 177 AD
Explanation: The historical record indicates Marcus Peducaeus Plautius Quintillus served as ordinary consul in 177 AD.
What does the reference to the 'Peducaei gens' indicate concerning Marcus Peducaeus Stloga Priscinus's family?
Answer: Their origins were tied to the Roman Republic era.
Explanation: The reference to the 'Peducaei gens' indicates that the family lineage possessed origins in the Roman Republic.
An inscription discovered in Rome suggests Marcus Peducaeus Stloga Priscinus served as governor of the province of Asia.
Answer: False
Explanation: The provided information specifies that the inscription potentially linking Priscinus to a governorship was discovered in Ephesus, not Rome.
Professor Géza Alföldy endorsed the scholarly identification of Marcus Peducaeus Stloga Priscinus as the Proconsul of Asia, citing evidence from the Ephesus inscription.
Answer: True
Explanation: The historical record confirms Professor Géza Alföldy's endorsement of the identification of Marcus Peducaeus Stloga Priscinus as the Proconsul of Asia, predicated upon the Ephesus inscription.
The identification of Marcus Peducaeus Stloga Priscinus as the Proconsul of Asia has been universally accepted by all historians.
Answer: False
Explanation: The historical record indicates that this identification is subject to scholarly debate, with figures such as Ronald Syme proposing alternative interpretations.
Ronald Syme contended that the Ephesus inscription referred to Marcus Peducaeus Stloga Priscinus's adopted son, Marcus Peducaeus Plautius Quintillus.
Answer: False
Explanation: The historical record indicates that Ronald Syme argued the inscription referred to Priscinus's father, not his adopted son.
The inscription potentially identifying Priscinus as governor was discovered in the Roman Forum.
Answer: False
Explanation: The provided information specifies that the inscription was discovered in the Great Theatre at Ephesus, not the Roman Forum.
The province of Asia constituted a minor administrative region in the northern sector of the Roman Empire.
Answer: False
Explanation: The provided information characterizes the province of Asia as a significant and affluent region located in modern-day Turkey, contradicting the notion of it being a minor northern territory.
Which Roman province has been tentatively associated with Marcus Peducaeus Stloga Priscinus in the capacity of governor?
Answer: Asia
Explanation: The historical record tentatively associates Marcus Peducaeus Stloga Priscinus with the governorship of the province of Asia.
Where was the inscription discovered that potentially identifies Marcus Peducaeus Stloga Priscinus as a governor?
Answer: In Ephesus, within the Great Theatre.
Explanation: The inscription was discovered within the Great Theatre at Ephesus.
Who is the prominent historian who disputed the identification of Marcus Peducaeus Stloga Priscinus as the Proconsul of Asia?
Answer: Ronald Syme
Explanation: Ronald Syme is the prominent historian who disputed this identification.
What was Ronald Syme's alternative interpretation concerning the Ephesus inscription?
Answer: It referred to Marcus Peducaeus Stloga Priscinus's father.
Explanation: Syme contended that the inscription referred to Marcus Peducaeus Stloga Priscinus's father.
What potential ambiguity exists concerning the Marcus Peducaeus Priscinus referenced in the Ephesus inscription?
Answer: Whether the inscription referred to him or his father.
Explanation: The ambiguity pertains to whether the inscription refers to Marcus Peducaeus Stloga Priscinus or his father.
What was the probable role of the province of Asia within the Roman Empire?
Answer: A significant and wealthy province in the western part of modern Turkey.
Explanation: The historical record characterizes the province of Asia as a significant and affluent territory situated in modern-day Turkey.
Titus Hoenius Severus served as the colleague of Marcus Peducaeus Stloga Priscinus during their tenure as ordinary consuls.
Answer: True
Explanation: The historical record explicitly states that Titus Hoenius Severus served as the colleague of Marcus Peducaeus Stloga Priscinus during their joint term as ordinary consuls in 141 AD.
A 'proconsular governor' functioned as a low-ranking official tasked with local tax collection.
Answer: False
Explanation: The provided definition characterizes a proconsular governor as an official possessing significant military and civil authority, rather than a low-ranking tax collector.
The office of 'ordinary consul' constituted a secondary magistracy, subordinate in rank to the praetors.
Answer: False
Explanation: The historical record defines the ordinary consul as the highest regular magistracy, not subordinate to the praetors.
Suffect consuls assumed the duties of ordinary consuls solely in instances where the latter were convicted of treason.
Answer: False
Explanation: The provided information indicates that suffect consuls replaced ordinary consuls to serve partial terms, not exclusively in cases of treason.
Marcus Barbius Aemilianus and Titus Flavius Julianus served as ordinary consuls immediately subsequent to Marcus Peducaeus Stloga Priscinus in 141 AD.
Answer: False
Explanation: The historical record indicates that Gaius Julius Pisibanus and Lepidus succeeded Priscinus and Severus, not Marcus Barbius Aemilianus and Titus Flavius Julianus.
Gaius Julius Pisibanus and Lepidus succeeded Priscinus and Severus as ordinary consuls in 141 AD.
Answer: False
Explanation: The historical record indicates that Pisibanus and Lepidus succeeded Priscinus and Severus as consuls, presumably as suffect consuls, rather than as ordinary consuls for the full annual term.
Suffect consuls replaced ordinary consuls only if the latter were found guilty of treason.
Answer: False
Explanation: The provided information indicates that suffect consuls replaced ordinary consuls to serve partial terms, not exclusively in cases of treason.
Marcus Barbius Aemilianus and Titus Flavius Julianus served as ordinary consuls immediately subsequent to Marcus Peducaeus Stloga Priscinus in 141 AD.
Answer: False
Explanation: The historical record indicates that Gaius Julius Pisibanus and Lepidus succeeded Priscinus and Severus, not Marcus Barbius Aemilianus and Titus Flavius Julianus.
Gaius Julius Pisibanus and Lepidus succeeded Priscinus and Severus as ordinary consuls in 141 AD.
Answer: False
Explanation: The historical record indicates that Pisibanus and Lepidus succeeded Priscinus and Severus as consuls, presumably as suffect consuls, rather than as ordinary consuls for the full annual term.
Who served as the colleague of Marcus Peducaeus Stloga Priscinus during his tenure as ordinary consul?
Answer: Titus Hoenius Severus
Explanation: The historical record identifies Titus Hoenius Severus as the colleague of Marcus Peducaeus Stloga Priscinus during their joint ordinary consulship in 141 AD.
What does the term 'ordinary consul' signify within the Roman political system?
Answer: The highest regular magistracy with supreme executive power.
Explanation: The ordinary consul represented the highest regular magistracy within both the Roman Republic and Empire.
What role did 'suffect consuls' fulfill within the Roman political system?
Answer: They were appointed to serve for a partial term as consul.
Explanation: Suffect consuls fulfilled roles by serving partial terms, stepping in when ordinary consuls were unable to complete their designated tenure.
According to the succession data, who served as suffect consuls immediately preceding the consulship of Priscinus and Severus in 141 AD?
Answer: Marcus Barbius Aemilianus and Titus Flavius Julianus
Explanation: The succession data lists Marcus Barbius Aemilianus and Titus Flavius Julianus as the suffect consuls who preceded Priscinus and Severus.
Ronald Syme's scholarly article challenging the identification of the Proconsul of Asia was published within a volume dedicated to Roman law.
Answer: False
Explanation: The historical record indicates that Syme's article was published in the journal *Zeitschrift für Papyrologie und Epigraphik*, not within a book on Roman law.
Ronald Syme's article disputing the Proconsul of Asia was published in a book on Roman law.
Answer: False
Explanation: The historical record indicates that Syme's article was published in the journal *Zeitschrift für Papyrologie und Epigraphik*, not within a book on Roman law.
What does the reference to Olli Salomies' scholarly work suggest regarding the study of Roman figures such as Priscinus?
Answer: It highlights the study of Roman naming conventions and adoption.
Explanation: The reference to Olli Salomies' scholarly work emphasizes the critical importance of understanding Roman naming conventions, particularly concerning adoption, for the accurate identification of historical figures.
What does the instruction "DO NOT OMIT SECTIONS" imply for the generation of Q&A content?
Answer: Ensure the generated questions cover the entire source document comprehensively.
Explanation: This instruction implies that all sections of the source document must be comprehensively addressed within the generated questions.
What is the primary constraint imposed upon the AI concerning external knowledge during the generation of questions and answers?
Answer: Knowledge is strictly confined to the provided source text, with limited use of general knowledge only for context.
Explanation: The AI is strictly confined to the provided source text, with general knowledge permitted solely for contextual clarification, not for the introduction of new factual information.