Enter a player name to begin or load your saved progress.
Marduk-zer-X was a ruler during the Neo-Babylonian period.
Answer: False
Explanation: This statement is incorrect. While the term Neo-Babylonian is sometimes used broadly, Marduk-zer-X reigned during the Middle Babylonian period as part of the Second Dynasty of Isin.
Marduk-zer-X reigned as a monarch during the First Dynasty of Babylon.
Answer: False
Explanation: This statement is incorrect. Marduk-zer-X was a ruler of the Second Dynasty of Isin, not the First Dynasty of Babylon.
Marduk-zer-X's predecessor on the throne of Babylon was Nabu-shum-libur.
Answer: False
Explanation: This statement is false. Marduk-zer-X's predecessor was Marduk-ahhe-eriba.
The familial relationship between Marduk-zer-X and his successor, Nabu-shum-libur, is well-documented.
Answer: False
Explanation: This statement is false. The available historical records indicate that the relationship between Marduk-zer-X and his successor, Nabu-shum-libur, is uncertain.
According to the navbox, Marduk-zer-X is listed as the fourth king of the Second Dynasty of Isin.
Answer: False
Explanation: This statement is false. The navbox indicates that Marduk-zer-X was the tenth king listed within the Second Dynasty of Isin.
The term 'penultimate' denotes the final ruler in a historical sequence.
Answer: False
Explanation: This statement is false. 'Penultimate' signifies the second-to-last position in a sequence.
The historical designation 'Fourth Dynasty of Babylon' refers to a distinct ruling house separate from the Second Dynasty of Isin.
Answer: False
Explanation: This statement is false. The Second Dynasty of Isin is historically recognized as the Fourth Dynasty of Babylon.
Marduk-zer-X held the position of the penultimate ruler within the Second Dynasty of Isin.
Answer: True
Explanation: This statement is accurate. As the second-to-last ruler, Marduk-zer-X occupied the penultimate position in his dynasty.
Marduk-zer-X was a ruler associated with the Second Dynasty of Isin, which is also identified as the Fourth Dynasty of Babylon.
Answer: True
Explanation: This statement is accurate. The Second Dynasty of Isin is commonly referred to as the Fourth Dynasty of Babylon in historical classifications.
Identify the historical figure Marduk-zer-X.
Answer: A Babylonian king of the 2nd Dynasty of Isin (also known as the 4th Dynasty of Babylon).
Explanation: Marduk-zer-X was a ruler of the Second Dynasty of Isin, which is also recognized as the Fourth Dynasty of Babylon. He reigned during the Middle Babylonian period.
To which Babylonian dynasty did Marduk-zer-X belong?
Answer: The 2nd Dynasty of Isin
Explanation: Marduk-zer-X was a ruler of the Second Dynasty of Isin, a significant ruling house in Babylonian history.
Identify Marduk-zer-X's immediate predecessor on the Babylonian throne.
Answer: Marduk-ahhe-eriba
Explanation: The historical records indicate that Marduk-zer-X's predecessor on the throne was Marduk-ahhe-eriba.
Identify the successor to Marduk-zer-X as King of Babylon.
Answer: Nabu-shum-libur
Explanation: Following Marduk-zer-X's reign, Nabu-shum-libur ascended to the throne of Babylon.
What is the extent of knowledge regarding the dynastic relationship between Marduk-zer-X and his successor, Nabu-shum-libur?
Answer: Their relationship is uncertain according to available records.
Explanation: The historical documentation does not provide clear information about the familial or dynastic connection between Marduk-zer-X and his successor, Nabu-shum-libur.
Define the term 'penultimate' in the context of Marduk-zer-X's position within his dynasty.
Answer: The second-to-last ruler of the dynasty.
Explanation: 'Penultimate' signifies the position immediately preceding the last one in a sequence. Therefore, Marduk-zer-X was the second-to-last ruler of his dynasty.
To which Babylonian dynasty is the designation 'Fourth Dynasty of Babylon' synonymous?
Answer: The 2nd Dynasty of Isin
Explanation: The designation 'Fourth Dynasty of Babylon' is historically synonymous with the Second Dynasty of Isin, to which Marduk-zer-X belonged.
Which of the following statements regarding Marduk-zer-X is FALSE?
Answer: He was succeeded by Marduk-ahhe-eriba.
Explanation: The statement that Marduk-zer-X was succeeded by Marduk-ahhe-eriba is false. Marduk-ahhe-eriba was his predecessor; his successor was Nabu-shum-libur.
What does the term 'penultimate' mean regarding Marduk-zer-X's position?
Answer: The second-to-last king in his dynasty.
Explanation: The term 'penultimate' refers to the second position from the end in a sequence, thus indicating that Marduk-zer-X was the second-to-last ruler of his dynasty.
Marduk-zer-X's reign is estimated to have spanned approximately twenty years, from circa 1041 to 1021 BC.
Answer: False
Explanation: This statement is false. While the dates are approximate, the duration is closer to eleven years (c. 1041–1030 BC), not twenty.
King List A records that Marduk-zer-X ruled for exactly twelve years.
Answer: True
Explanation: This statement is accurate. King List A provides a specific duration of twelve years for Marduk-zer-X's reign.
Research published by Paul-Alain Beaulieu in 2018 revised the estimated reign dates of Marduk-zer-X to circa 1041–1030 BC.
Answer: True
Explanation: This statement is accurate. Beaulieu's 2018 work provides revised chronological estimates for Marduk-zer-X's reign.
Prior to Paul-Alain Beaulieu's 2018 revision, Marduk-zer-X's reign was dated approximately from 1046 to 1033 BC.
Answer: True
Explanation: This statement is accurate. The previous dating of Marduk-zer-X's reign has been updated by more recent scholarly research.
The abbreviation 'c.' preceding historical dates signifies 'circa,' indicating an approximate timeframe.
Answer: True
Explanation: This statement is accurate. 'c.' is the standard abbreviation for 'circa,' used to denote approximate dates in historical contexts.
The reign of Marduk-zer-X is estimated to have occurred during the late 12th century BC.
Answer: False
Explanation: This statement is incorrect. Current scholarship places Marduk-zer-X's reign in the early 11th century BC, specifically circa 1041–1030 BC.
According to revised scholarship, what was the approximate reign period of Marduk-zer-X?
Answer: c. 1041 to 1030 BC
Explanation: Revised scholarship, notably by Paul-Alain Beaulieu in 2018, places Marduk-zer-X's reign approximately from circa 1041 to 1030 BC.
According to King List A, what was the duration of Marduk-zer-X's reign?
Answer: Twelve years
Explanation: King List A explicitly records that Marduk-zer-X reigned for a period of twelve years.
The abbreviation 'c.' preceding historical dates signifies 'circa,' indicating an approximate timeframe.
Answer: Circa (approximately)
Explanation: The abbreviation 'c.' is standard notation for 'circa,' signifying that the associated date is an approximation rather than an exact figure.
Marduk-zer-X is primarily identified as a historical figure through surviving royal inscriptions dating from his reign.
Answer: False
Explanation: This statement is false. Marduk-zer-X is primarily identified through ancient king lists, such as King List A and the Synchronistic King List, as direct royal inscriptions from his reign are not definitively known.
The accompanying image within the source material depicts a statue of Marduk-zer-X.
Answer: False
Explanation: This statement is false. The image displays Marduk-zer-X's name rendered in Akkadian script, not a statue.
King List A is identified by the tablet number Assur 14646c.
Answer: False
Explanation: This statement is false. King List A is identified by the tablet number BM 33332. Assur 14646c refers to the Synchronistic King List.
The Synchronistic King List is referenced by the tablet number VAT 10179.
Answer: False
Explanation: This statement is false. VAT 10179 is the tablet number associated with the Prophecy A text. The Synchronistic King List is identified as Assur 14646c.
The Synchronistic King List is crucial for identifying Marduk-zer-X, and it is noted as being fully intact.
Answer: False
Explanation: This statement is false. While crucial, the Synchronistic King List, like King List A, is known to be damaged in critical sections, making its information incomplete.
What is the principal form of evidence utilized for the identification of Marduk-zer-X as a historical ruler?
Answer: Ancient king lists like King List A and the Synchronistic King List
Explanation: Marduk-zer-X is primarily identified through his inclusion in ancient Mesopotamian king lists, which are fundamental primary sources for reconstructing royal successions.
Are there any definitively dated inscriptions originating from Marduk-zer-X's reign?
Answer: No inscriptions have been definitively identified as being from his reign.
Explanation: Currently, no inscriptions have been conclusively attributed to Marduk-zer-X's reign, making the king lists the primary source for his historical existence.
By which tablet number is King List A identified?
Answer: BM 33332
Explanation: King List A, a crucial source for identifying Babylonian rulers, is identified by the tablet number BM 33332.
What are the source references (tablet numbers) for the Prophecy A text?
Answer: VAT 10179 and KAR 421
Explanation: The Prophecy A text is referenced in scholarly literature by the tablet numbers VAT 10179 and KAR 421.
The Synchronistic King List is identified by which tablet number?
Answer: Assur 14646c
Explanation: The Synchronistic King List, a vital source for Mesopotamian chronology, is identified by the tablet number Assur 14646c.
Which of the following is not considered a primary source for the identification of Marduk-zer-X?
Answer: Walker Chronicle
Explanation: While the Walker Chronicle is a valuable historical source, it is generally considered a secondary or interpretive source in relation to the direct identification of rulers like Marduk-zer-X, unlike king lists or prophecies which directly name or allude to them.
The presence of 'X' in the name Marduk-zer-X signifies that the terminal portion of his name is indeterminate due to damage in the extant historical records.
Answer: True
Explanation: This statement is accurate. The 'X' is a scholarly convention used when the final part of a name is missing or illegible in the primary sources, such as King List A and the Synchronistic King List.
Scholarly consensus confirms that the 'zer' component of Marduk-zer-X's name is definitively read as 'zer'.
Answer: False
Explanation: This statement is false. Scholars propose that the cuneiform character might actually be MU, suggesting alternative readings or interpretations for the 'zer' component.
Scholars Hallo and Younger posited that the text known as Prophecy A may refer to rulers within Marduk-zer-X's dynastic lineage.
Answer: True
Explanation: This statement is accurate. Hallo and Younger are noted for their speculative interpretations linking Prophecy A to kings of this period.
Within the speculative interpretation of Prophecy A, Marduk-zer-X is identified as King III.
Answer: False
Explanation: This statement is false. In the speculative interpretation by Hallo and Younger, Marduk-zer-X is identified with King VI, not King III.
The discovery of the Walker Chronicle has corroborated the interpretation of Prophecy A concerning rulers of this historical period.
Answer: False
Explanation: This statement is false. The Walker Chronicle has, in fact, challenged or undermined certain previous interpretations of Prophecy A, particularly regarding the sequence and identity of rulers.
Recent research, particularly by Beaulieu (2018), challenges the prior assumption that Marduk-kabit-ahheshu, the founder of the second dynasty of Isin, ruled concurrently with the last Kassite king.
Answer: True
Explanation: This statement is accurate. New research has led to revisions in the understanding of the chronological relationship between the end of the Kassite period and the beginning of the Second Dynasty of Isin.
In a speculative interpretation of the Prophecy A text, the phenomenon of rivers filling with silt is associated with King III.
Answer: False
Explanation: This statement is false. The detail concerning rivers filling with silt is associated with King VI in the speculative interpretation, not King III.
The Walker Chronicle confirmed the interpretation that Adad-apla-iddina was a usurper.
Answer: False
Explanation: This statement is false. The Walker Chronicle's findings have instead challenged or cast doubt on previous interpretations regarding Adad-apla-iddina and other rulers.
What does the 'X' appended to the name Marduk-zer-X signify?
Answer: It signifies that the final part of his name is unknown due to damaged sources.
Explanation: The 'X' is a scholarly convention indicating that the terminal portion of Marduk-zer-X's name is missing or illegible in the primary historical sources, such as king lists.
Which of the following statements accurately reflects the scholarly understanding of the 'zer' component in Marduk-zer-X's name?
Answer: Scholars suggest it might be a different cuneiform character, possibly 'MU'.
Explanation: Scholarly analysis indicates uncertainty regarding the reading of the 'zer' component, with suggestions that the cuneiform sign might actually represent 'MU'.
Which scholars speculated about the Prophecy A text referring to kings of Marduk-zer-X's dynasty?
Answer: Hallo and Younger
Explanation: Scholars George E. Mendenhall and Morton Smith are credited with early work on Prophecy A, but Hallo and Younger are specifically mentioned in the context of speculating about its connection to Marduk-zer-X's dynasty.
Within the speculative interpretation of Prophecy A, which king is posited to represent Marduk-zer-X?
Answer: King VI
Explanation: In the speculative interpretation of Prophecy A by scholars like Hallo and Younger, Marduk-zer-X is identified with the figure designated as King VI.
What specific detail is mentioned in the fragmented text of King VI (speculatively Marduk-zer-X) within Prophecy A?
Answer: The rivers were said to have filled with silt.
Explanation: The fragmented text associated with King VI in Prophecy A includes a mention that the rivers were described as having filled with silt.
Which discovery has challenged the established interpretations of Prophecy A concerning the rulers of this historical period?
Answer: The Walker Chronicle
Explanation: The discovery and analysis of the Walker Chronicle have introduced new evidence that challenges or modifies previous scholarly interpretations of Prophecy A and its correlation with earlier kings.
Within the speculative interpretation of Prophecy A, which king is identified as Marduk-nadin-ahhe?
Answer: King III
Explanation: In the speculative interpretation of Prophecy A by scholars like Hallo and Younger, Marduk-nadin-ahhe is identified with the figure designated as King III.
In the context of the provided source material, what is the likely function of the term 'infobox-label'?
Answer: Descriptive text identifying data within the infobox (e.g., 'Predecessor').
Explanation: 'Infobox-label' typically serves as the descriptive text that identifies specific data points within an infobox, such as 'Reign,' 'Predecessor,' or 'Dynasty.'
Ashurnasirpal I of Assyria was a contemporary monarch during the reign of Marduk-zer-X.
Answer: True
Explanation: This statement is accurate. Ashurnasirpal I of Assyria reigned during the same general period as Marduk-zer-X, indicating concurrent political entities in Mesopotamia.
The navbox places the Second Dynasty of Isin (Dynasty IV) within the Neo-Babylonian period.
Answer: False
Explanation: This statement is false. The navbox lists the Second Dynasty of Isin (Dynasty IV) as belonging to the Middle Babylonian period.
Which Assyrian monarch reigned concurrently with Marduk-zer-X?
Answer: Ashurnasirpal I
Explanation: Ashurnasirpal I of Assyria was a contemporary ruler during the period when Marduk-zer-X held the throne in Babylon.
According to the navbox, within which historical period is the Second Dynasty of Isin situated?
Answer: Middle Babylonian period
Explanation: The navbox explicitly places the Second Dynasty of Isin, also designated as Dynasty IV, within the broader historical context of the Middle Babylonian period.