Welcome!

Enter a player name to begin or load your saved progress.

Piraeus Lion Wiki2Web Clarity Challenge

Home Return to Study Hints Random
Global Score: 0
Trophies: 0 🏆

‹ Back

Score: 0 / 100

Study Guide: The Piraeus Lion: History and Significance

Cheat Sheet:
The Piraeus Lion: History and Significance Study Guide

The Piraeus Lion: Origin and Description

The Piraeus Lion is a marble sculpture, approximately three meters in height, presently housed within the Venetian Arsenal in Italy.

Answer: True

Explanation: The Piraeus Lion is indeed a marble sculpture of considerable size, approximately three meters in height, and is currently displayed at the Venetian Arsenal in Italy.

Return to Game

The Piraeus Lion statue was not originally situated in Rome; its initial placement was in Piraeus harbor, Athens.

Answer: True

Explanation: The Piraeus Lion statue's original location was the harbor of Piraeus, Athens, not Rome.

Return to Game

The sculptor of the Piraeus Lion remains unidentified; it is not Michelangelo.

Answer: True

Explanation: The artist responsible for sculpting the Piraeus Lion is unknown, and it is certainly not Michelangelo.

Return to Game

Replicas of the Piraeus Lion statue are located in Stockholm and within the Piraeus Archaeological Museum in Athens.

Answer: True

Explanation: Copies of the Piraeus Lion statue can be found in Stockholm and at the Piraeus Archaeological Museum.

Return to Game

The Piraeus Lion statue is dated to approximately 360 BC.

Answer: True

Explanation: The statue is estimated to have been sculpted around 360 BC.

Return to Game

The Piraeus Lion was not originally known by the designation 'Marble Beast of Athens'.

Answer: True

Explanation: There is no historical record indicating that the Piraeus Lion was originally known as the 'Marble Beast of Athens'.

Return to Game

The Piraeus Lion has been situated in Piraeus harbor since approximately the 1st or 2nd century AD.

Answer: True

Explanation: The statue has been a landmark in Piraeus harbor since the 1st or 2nd century AD.

Return to Game

The statue was originally located in the port of Piraeus, which is the port of Athens, not near Thessaloniki.

Answer: True

Explanation: The Piraeus Lion was situated in Piraeus, the port city of Athens, Greece.

Return to Game

The Piraeus Lion is not currently located in the Piraeus Archaeological Museum; it is housed in the Venetian Arsenal.

Answer: True

Explanation: The Piraeus Lion is displayed at the Venetian Arsenal in Italy, not in the Piraeus Archaeological Museum.

Return to Game

Regarding its material composition and dimensions, what is the Piraeus Lion primarily fashioned from, and what is its approximate height?

Answer: Marble, approximately 3 meters high

Explanation: The Piraeus Lion is a marble sculpture standing approximately 3 meters (9 feet) high.

Return to Game

Identify the original location of the Piraeus Lion prior to its relocation to Venice.

Answer: The harbor of Piraeus, Athens

Explanation: The Piraeus Lion was originally situated in the harbor of Piraeus, the port city of Athens.

Return to Game

Determine the approximate period during which the Piraeus Lion statue was sculpted.

Answer: Around 360 BC

Explanation: The Piraeus Lion statue is estimated to have been sculpted around 360 BC.

Return to Game

Identify the location that is NOT mentioned as housing a replica of the Piraeus Lion statue.

Answer: The British Museum, London

Explanation: While replicas exist in Stockholm and the Piraeus Archaeological Museum, the British Museum is not mentioned as housing a copy.

Return to Game

For approximately how long has the Piraeus Lion served as a landmark in the port of Piraeus?

Answer: Since the 1st or 2nd century AD

Explanation: The Piraeus Lion has been a landmark in Piraeus harbor since approximately the 1st or 2nd century AD.

Return to Game

Historical Context: Looting and Relocation

The Piraeus Lion was not looted from Greece by the French during the Napoleonic Wars; its removal occurred under different circumstances.

Answer: True

Explanation: The Piraeus Lion was removed from Greece by Venetian forces under Francesco Morosini during the Great Turkish War, not by the French during the Napoleonic Wars.

Return to Game

During the Venetian siege of Athens in 1687, Francesco Morosini's military actions, which resulted in the acquisition of the Piraeus Lion, also led to substantial damage to the Parthenon.

Answer: True

Explanation: Francesco Morosini's campaign in Athens in 1687, which included the looting of the lion, also resulted in significant damage to the Parthenon.

Return to Game

Identify the individual credited with the removal of the Piraeus Lion from Greece and the specific historical conflict during which this occurred.

Answer: Francesco Morosini during the Great Turkish War

Explanation: Francesco Morosini, the Venetian commander, looted the Piraeus Lion in 1687 during the Great Turkish War.

Return to Game

Identify the specific historical conflict directly associated with the looting of the Piraeus Lion.

Answer: The Great Turkish War

Explanation: The looting of the Piraeus Lion by Francesco Morosini occurred during the Great Turkish War (1683-1699).

Return to Game

Runic Inscriptions: Decipherment and Content

Runic inscriptions discovered on the Piraeus Lion are generally attributed to Scandinavians and are believed to have been carved during the 11th century AD.

Answer: True

Explanation: Scholarly consensus suggests that the runic inscriptions found on the Piraeus Lion were carved by Scandinavians in the 11th century AD.

Return to Game

The runic inscriptions on the Piraeus Lion present significant challenges to translation due to their eroded state, requiring considerable reconstruction by scholars.

Answer: True

Explanation: The runic inscriptions are heavily eroded, making them difficult to read and necessitating reconstruction by translators.

Return to Game

The identification of the markings on the Piraeus Lion as runic script was first made in the mid-19th century by Carl Christian Rafn.

Answer: False

Explanation: While Carl Christian Rafn was instrumental in translating the runes, the initial identification of the markings as runes occurred earlier, in the late 18th century by Johan David Åkerblad.

Return to Game

Erik Brate's 1914 interpretation is widely regarded as the most successful attempt at translating the runic inscriptions, not the least successful.

Answer: True

Explanation: Erik Brate's 1914 interpretation is considered the most successful and comprehensive attempt at translating the runic inscriptions.

Return to Game

The runic inscriptions do not mention an expedition involving Egil and Ragnar into Persia and India.

Answer: True

Explanation: While expeditions are mentioned in some translations, the specific combination of Egil and Ragnar traveling to Persia and India is not detailed in the runic inscriptions.

Return to Game

The runic inscriptions contain specific references, such as 'The Swedes set this on the lion,' and name individuals like Æskell and Þorleif, associated with the region of Roslagen.

Answer: True

Explanation: Translations of the runic inscriptions mention 'The Swedes set this on the lion' and name warriors such as Æskell and Þorleif from Roslagen.

Return to Game

The definitive confirmation of Harald Hardrada's name within the runic inscriptions is considered unlikely by scholars.

Answer: True

Explanation: Scholarly analysis suggests that the historical period associated with Harald Hardrada does not align with the likely dating of the runic inscriptions, making his definitive confirmation improbable.

Return to Game

Carl Christian Rafn's translation of the runic inscriptions occurred in the mid-19th century, not the early 19th century.

Answer: True

Explanation: Carl Christian Rafn completed his translation of the runic inscriptions in the mid-19th century, specifically around 1854.

Return to Game

According to translations of the runic inscriptions, actions included the capture of an individual named Dalk and the imposition of a fine upon the Greek populace.

Answer: True

Explanation: Translations of the runic inscriptions mention the capture of a person named Dalk and the levying of a fine on the Greeks.

Return to Game

The runic inscriptions commemorate Horsi, described as a valiant warrior who acquired wealth and for whom these runes were inscribed.

Answer: True

Explanation: According to interpretations of the runic inscriptions, Horsi is mentioned as a distinguished warrior who obtained gold and for whom the runes were carved in memory.

Return to Game

What unique feature on the surface of the Piraeus Lion distinguishes it from other ancient Greek sculptures?

Answer: It features two lengthy runic inscriptions.

Explanation: The Piraeus Lion is distinguished by the presence of two extensive runic inscriptions carved onto its shoulders and flanks.

Return to Game

Based on scholarly consensus, who are the presumed carvers of the runic inscriptions, and in which century is this activity generally dated?

Answer: Scandinavians (Vikings/Varangians), in the 11th century AD

Explanation: Scholars generally agree that the runic inscriptions were carved by Scandinavians, likely Vikings or Varangians, during the 11th century AD.

Return to Game

Identify the individual who first recognized the markings on the lion as runes, and specify the century in which this identification occurred.

Answer: Johan David Åkerblad, late 18th century

Explanation: Johan David Åkerblad first identified the markings on the Piraeus Lion as runes in the late 18th century.

Return to Game

According to Erik Brate's translation of the runic inscriptions, which group performed the action of 'cutting him down in the midst of his forces'?

Answer: The Swedes

Explanation: Erik Brate's translation indicates that 'The Swedes' performed the action of 'cutting him down in the midst of his forces'.

Return to Game

What significant challenge do scholars encounter when attempting to interpret the runic inscriptions on the Piraeus Lion?

Answer: The runes are heavily eroded and difficult to read.

Explanation: The primary challenge in translating the runic inscriptions is their heavily eroded condition, which obscures many runes and necessitates scholarly reconstruction.

Return to Game

Carl Christian Rafn's translation of the runic inscriptions posits that Hakon and his companions engaged in specific actions, including the conquest of the port, levying a fine on the Greeks, and holding a captive named Dalk.

Answer: They conquered the port, fined the Greeks, and detained someone named Dalk.

Explanation: Rafn's translation suggests that Hakon and his companions conquered the port, imposed a fine on the Greeks, and captured an individual named Dalk.

Return to Game

Explain the reasoning behind considering the association of Harald Hardrada with the runic inscriptions as unlikely.

Answer: The historical period does not align with his known activities.

Explanation: The primary reason the association with Harald Hardrada is considered unlikely is that the estimated period of the inscriptions' carving does not correspond with his known historical activities.

Return to Game

Erik Brate's interpretation of the runic inscriptions indicates that they were carved in memory of Horsi, who is characterized as a distinguished warrior.

Answer: They were carved in his memory.

Explanation: Erik Brate's translation suggests the runes were inscribed in memory of Horsi, described as a good warrior.

Return to Game

Identify the publication cited in 1984 that discusses the Piraeus Lion's runic inscriptions.

Answer: Nordisk Tidskrift

Explanation: The publication cited from 1984 concerning the Piraeus Lion's runic inscriptions is Nordisk Tidskrift.

Return to Game

Interpretations and Significance

The Italian designation for the Piraeus Lion is not 'Leone di Atene'.

Answer: True

Explanation: The Italian name for the Piraeus Lion is 'Leone del Pireo', not 'Leone di Atene'.

Return to Game

Evidence suggests the Piraeus Lion may have served a functional purpose, potentially as a fountain, indicated by features such as a hollow throat and the presence of a pipe conduit.

Answer: True

Explanation: The statue's hollow throat and evidence of a pipe conduit suggest it might have been designed to function as a fountain.

Return to Game

The port of Piraeus became known as 'Porto Leone' not because it was the birthplace of Francesco Morosini, but due to the prominent presence of the Piraeus Lion statue.

Answer: True

Explanation: The port of Piraeus acquired the Italian name 'Porto Leone' (Lion Port) due to the statue's prominence, not due to Morosini's origin.

Return to Game

The term 'lindworm,' referring to a type of dragon, is relevant to the Piraeus Lion's runic inscription style, which is carved in a similar serpentine form.

Answer: True

Explanation: The runic inscriptions are carved in a style resembling a lindworm, a serpentine dragon, which is a common motif in Scandinavian art.

Return to Game

At its current location in the Venetian Arsenal, the Piraeus Lion serves as a symbol representing Venice's patron saint, Saint Mark.

Answer: True

Explanation: The Piraeus Lion is displayed at the Venetian Arsenal and symbolizes Saint Mark, the patron saint of Venice.

Return to Game

The runic inscriptions are characterized by their carving in the shape of an elaborate scroll, often likened to a lindworm.

Answer: True

Explanation: The style of the runic inscriptions is described as resembling an elaborate scroll or a lindworm, a serpentine dragon.

Return to Game

The Piraeus Lion is notable as one of the few ancient Greek sculptures bearing known runic inscriptions.

Answer: True

Explanation: The presence of runic inscriptions on an ancient Greek sculpture like the Piraeus Lion is a rare and significant historical phenomenon.

Return to Game

At the Venetian Arsenal, the Piraeus Lion holds significance primarily as a symbol representing Venice's patron saint, Saint Mark.

Answer: It symbolizes Venice's patron saint, Saint Mark.

Explanation: In its current location at the Venetian Arsenal, the Piraeus Lion functions symbolically as an emblem of Saint Mark, the patron saint of Venice.

Return to Game

What is the translation of the Italian name 'Porto Leone,' and what is the historical reason for the port of Piraeus being referred to by this name?

Answer: 'Lion Port'; due to the Piraeus Lion statue being a prominent landmark.

Explanation: 'Porto Leone' translates to 'Lion Port' in Italian, a name adopted because the Piraeus Lion statue was a significant and recognizable landmark for centuries.

Return to Game

What specific physical characteristics and historical descriptions suggest the Piraeus Lion may have functioned as a fountain?

Answer: A hollow throat and a mark where a pipe once ran.

Explanation: The statue's hollow throat and evidence of a pipe conduit, along with historical descriptions noting water flow, suggest it may have functioned as a fountain.

Return to Game

The style in which the runic inscriptions are carved on the Piraeus Lion is compared to that of a specific mythical creature known as a:

Answer: Lindworm

Explanation: The style of the runic inscriptions is compared to that of a lindworm, a type of dragon.

Return to Game

A 17th-century description from the 1670s provides evidence suggesting the Piraeus Lion may have functioned as a fountain, noting that water flowed from its mouth into a cistern.

Answer: Water flowed from its mouth into a cistern.

Explanation: A description from the 1670s indicates that water flowed from the lion's mouth into a cistern, supporting the fountain theory.

Return to Game

The Piraeus Lion serves as a unique artifact connecting the domain of ancient Greek sculpture with what other significant historical element?

Answer: Medieval Scandinavian history and language

Explanation: The Piraeus Lion bridges ancient Greek sculpture with medieval Scandinavian history and language through its runic inscriptions.

Return to Game