Enter a player name to begin or load your saved progress.
The Principality of the Pindus constituted a recognized political entity established during the interwar period.
Answer: False
Explanation: The Principality of the Pindus was a self-declared, autonomous Aromanian political entity that existed in Greece during World War II (1941-1942) within territory occupied by Axis powers. It was under the control of Fascist Italy but remained unrecognized by any major power, thus it was not a recognized political entity established during the interwar period.
The 'Samarina Republic,' declared in 1917, is sometimes referenced in historical accounts as an antecedent or parallel to the Principality of the Pindus.
Answer: True
Explanation: The 'Samarina Republic,' a short-lived political entity declared in 1917, is indeed sometimes referred to in historical contexts alongside or as an early iteration of the aspirations that later manifested as the Principality of the Pindus.
The Kingdom of Greece represented the preceding political authority in the territory where the Principality of the Pindus was later declared.
Answer: True
Explanation: The Kingdom of Greece was the established political entity in the region prior to the events surrounding the self-declaration of the Principality of the Pindus during the Axis occupation.
The Principality of the Pindus is associated with the historical period of the Balkan Wars.
Answer: False
Explanation: The Principality of the Pindus belongs to the historical era of World War II, not the Balkan Wars, as it emerged during the Axis occupation of Greece.
What was the Principality of the Pindus?
Answer: A short-lived, self-declared Aromanian political entity during WWII.
Explanation: The Principality of the Pindus was a transient, self-proclaimed Aromanian political entity that emerged during the Second World War within territory occupied by Axis powers.
Which historical entity preceded the Principality of the Pindus in the region?
Answer: The Kingdom of Greece
Explanation: The Kingdom of Greece was the established political authority in the territory prior to the period of Axis occupation and the subsequent declaration of the Principality of the Pindus.
What was the 'Samarina Republic'?
Answer: A short-lived political entity declared in 1917, sometimes called the Principality of the Pindus.
Explanation: The 'Samarina Republic' was a political entity declared in 1917, which historical accounts sometimes associate with the concept or aspirations later embodied by the Principality of the Pindus.
Which entity succeeded the Principality of the Pindus in the region?
Answer: The Kingdom of Greece
Explanation: Following the period of the self-declared Principality of the Pindus, the Kingdom of Greece reasserted its authority in the region, marking the end of the principality's transient existence.
The Principality of the Pindus existed during which major global conflict?
Answer: World War II
Explanation: The Principality of the Pindus emerged and existed during the period of World War II, specifically within the context of the Axis occupation of Greece.
Alcibiades Diamandi was identified as the leader of the Greek Resistance who actively opposed the establishment of the Principality of the Pindus.
Answer: False
Explanation: Alcibiades Diamandi was an Aromanian figure who promoted the idea of a semi-independent state, later referred to as the Principality of the Pindus, and was associated with the collaborationist Roman Legion, not the Greek Resistance.
Nicolaos Matussis succeeded Alcibiades Diamandi and subsequently engaged in active collaboration with the Italian occupation forces.
Answer: False
Explanation: While Nicolaos Matussis succeeded Alcibiades Diamandi within the Roman Legion, he later denied any association with the organization and claimed accusations of collaboration were fabricated.
The Roman Legion was an anti-Axis resistance group operating in Greece.
Answer: False
Explanation: The Roman Legion was a collaborationist organization formed by Alcibiades Diamandi with Italian support, aiming to promote Aromanian autonomy, rather than an anti-Axis resistance group.
Alcibiades Diamandi departed from Greece for Italy in July 1942.
Answer: False
Explanation: Alcibiades Diamandi departed from Greece in July 1942, but his destination was Romania, not Italy.
Who was Alcibiades Diamandi?
Answer: An Aromanian figure active in promoting a semi-independent state with Italian support.
Explanation: Alcibiades Diamandi was an Aromanian individual who actively promoted the concept of a semi-independent state, often referred to as the Principality of the Pindus, and was associated with the collaborationist Roman Legion.
Who succeeded Alcibiades Diamandi as the leader of the Roman Legion?
Answer: Nicolaos Matussis
Explanation: Nicolaos Matussis, who served as second-in-command, succeeded Alcibiades Diamandi as the leader of the Roman Legion.
When did Alcibiades Diamandi depart from Greece?
Answer: July 1942
Explanation: Alcibiades Diamandi left Greece in July 1942, relocating to Romania.
Nicolaos Matussis claimed what regarding accusations of collaboration?
Answer: He denied any association with the Roman Legion and called accusations fabricated.
Explanation: Nicolaos Matussis consistently denied any involvement with the Roman Legion, asserting that accusations of collaboration against him were baseless fabrications.
Where did Alcibiades Diamandi go after leaving Greece in July 1942?
Answer: Romania
Explanation: Following his departure from Greece in July 1942, Alcibiades Diamandi relocated to Romania.
The Principality of the Pindus existed under the direct administrative control of Fascist Italy.
Answer: True
Explanation: The self-declared Principality of the Pindus was established in territory occupied by Axis powers and operated under the control of Fascist Italy, although it lacked formal recognition from major powers.
Italy perceived the Aromanians primarily as a significant threat to its strategic objectives in the Balkan region.
Answer: False
Explanation: Italian assessments viewed the Aromanians not as a threat, but as a potential element to be utilized in Italy's plans for the region. They were surveyed for their attitudes, with the understanding that their aspirations for autonomy could serve Italian interests.
The accompanying map illustrates the territory designated for the Principality of the Pindus within the context of Axis-occupied Greece.
Answer: True
Explanation: The map included in the source material visually delineates the territory proposed for the Principality of the Pindus, situated within the broader geographical area of Axis-occupied Greece during World War II.
Under which power was the Principality of the Pindus established?
Answer: Fascist Italy
Explanation: The Principality of the Pindus was established in territory occupied by Axis powers and operated under the control and influence of Fascist Italy.
Which historical event led to the territory where the Principality of the Pindus was declared being occupied by Axis powers?
Answer: World War II
Explanation: The occupation of Greece by Axis powers, which created the conditions for the declaration of the Principality of the Pindus, was a direct consequence of World War II.
The Aromanian designation for the Principality of the Pindus was 'Printsipat di la Pind'.
Answer: True
Explanation: The Aromanian name for the Principality of the Pindus was indeed 'Printsipat di la Pind', reflecting the linguistic identity of the Aromanian population associated with this self-declared entity.
Romania actively supported the establishment of the Principality of the Pindus under Alcibiades Diamandi.
Answer: False
Explanation: While Romania had historical interests in Aromanian populations and supported cultural initiatives, its fascist government ultimately rejected Alcibiades Diamandi's proposals for establishing a principality.
Greek was identified as one of the common languages spoken within the context of the Principality of the Pindus.
Answer: True
Explanation: Greek was among the languages associated with the Principality of the Pindus, reflecting the complex linguistic environment of the Aromanian communities and the region during that period.
The Italian nomenclature for the Principality was 'Principato del Pindo'.
Answer: True
Explanation: The Italian designation used for the Principality of the Pindus was indeed 'Principato del Pindo', reflecting the administrative language of the occupying power.
The Greek Prime Minister Eleftherios Venizelos consented in 1913 to the continued operation of Romanian schools within newly acquired Greek territories.
Answer: True
Explanation: Following the Balkan Wars, Greek Prime Minister Eleftherios Venizelos agreed in 1913 to permit the continued functioning of Romanian-funded schools in territories that had come under Greek sovereignty.
The 'Ullah millet,' established by the Ottoman Sultan in 1905, recognized Aromanians as a distinct group, with support from Romania.
Answer: True
Explanation: In 1905, the Ottoman Sultan issued a decree recognizing the Aromanians as a separate millet ('Ullah millet' or 'Vlach millet'), granting them rights to establish their own churches and schools, a move supported by Romania.
The Romanian designation for the Principality was 'Principatul de Pind'.
Answer: True
Explanation: The Romanian name attributed to the Principality of the Pindus was 'Principatul de Pind', reflecting Romania's historical engagement with Aromanian communities.
Italian assessments indicated that the majority of Aromanians in Greece were strongly independent and resistant to Greek assimilation.
Answer: False
Explanation: Italian assessments suggested that most Aromanians in Greece had been largely assimilated into the Greek community, with only some groups exhibiting pro-Italian or pro-Romanian sentiments.
Romania's efforts to exert influence over Aromanian populations commenced subsequent to the conclusion of World War II.
Answer: False
Explanation: Romania's engagement with Aromanian populations, including the funding of schools, began much earlier, notably in the late 19th and early 20th centuries, well before World War II concluded.
The principal objective of Romanian-funded schools was the promotion of Aromanian cultural independence.
Answer: False
Explanation: The primary aim of Romanian schools was to foster a sense of Romanian identity among Aromanian students, rather than solely promoting independent Aromanian culture.
Which of the following was NOT identified as a language associated with the Principality of the Pindus?
Answer: Bulgarian
Explanation: Aromanian, Italian, and Greek were languages associated with the Principality of the Pindus, reflecting the linguistic landscape of the region and the influences of the time. Bulgarian was not identified as a primary language in this context.
The Aromanian name for the Principality was:
Answer: Printsipat di la Pind
Explanation: The Aromanian designation for the Principality of the Pindus was 'Printsipat di la Pind', reflecting the vernacular language of the associated population.
Romania's historical efforts to influence Aromanians included:
Answer: Funding Romanian schools in Ottoman territories.
Explanation: Romania historically engaged with Aromanian populations by funding schools in territories where they resided, aiming to foster a sense of Romanian identity through linguistic and cultural ties.
What right did the 1905 decree by Sultan Abdulhamid II grant to Aromanians?
Answer: Recognition as a separate millet ('Ullah millet') with rights to establish own churches and schools.
Explanation: The 1905 decree by Sultan Abdulhamid II recognized the Aromanians as a distinct 'Ullah millet' (Vlach millet), granting them administrative rights over their religious and educational institutions.
What did Italian assessments suggest about the Aromanian population in Greece?
Answer: They were largely assimilated into the Greek community, with some exceptions.
Explanation: Italian surveys indicated that the majority of Aromanians in Greece had assimilated into the Greek populace, although certain groups displayed pro-Italian or pro-Romanian sentiments.
What was the primary objective of Romania's funding of schools for Aromanians?
Answer: To foster a sense of Romanian identity among Aromanians.
Explanation: Romania's educational initiatives among Aromanian communities were primarily aimed at cultivating a Romanian national identity, leveraging linguistic similarities.
What was the Italian name given to the Principality?
Answer: Principato del Pindo
Explanation: The Italian designation for the Principality was 'Principato del Pindo', reflecting the administrative language of Fascist Italy during the occupation.
What was the 'Ullah millet'?
Answer: An Ottoman decree recognizing Aromanians as a distinct millet.
Explanation: The 'Ullah millet' (or Vlach millet) was an administrative designation established by the Ottoman Empire in 1905, acknowledging the Aromanians as a separate community with rights to manage their own religious and educational affairs.
Nazi Germany formally approved the creation of an Aromanian principality in the Pindus region.
Answer: False
Explanation: Contrary to approval, Nazi Germany explicitly refused to endorse the establishment of an Aromanian principality in the Pindus region.
Alcibiades Diamandi's proposals for an autonomous Aromanian entity were accepted by the Greek collaborationist Prime Minister Georgios Tsolakoglou.
Answer: False
Explanation: Georgios Tsolakoglou, the Greek collaborationist Prime Minister, rejected Alcibiades Diamandi's demands for an autonomous Aromanian entity during their meeting in 1941.
Italian military authorities actively supported Aromanian self-administration as a means to foster genuine local autonomy.
Answer: False
Explanation: Italian military authorities declined to permit Aromanian self-administration, recognizing that purported desires for autonomy were often a facade for minority movements seeking political and economic advantages.
Fascist Italy actively opposed the establishment and existence of the Principality of the Pindus.
Answer: True
Explanation: Despite initial involvement in the region, Fascist Italy, along with Nazi Germany and other powers, ultimately opposed the self-declared Principality of the Pindus.
What was the status of the Principality of the Pindus concerning recognition by major world powers?
Answer: It was unrecognized by any major power.
Explanation: Despite its existence under Italian control during World War II, the Principality of the Pindus did not receive formal recognition from any major world power.
Why did Italian military authorities refuse Aromanian self-administration?
Answer: They saw it as a facade for a minority movement seeking advantages.
Explanation: Italian authorities declined Aromanian self-administration, perceiving their aspirations as a strategic maneuver by a minority movement seeking political and economic benefits, rather than a genuine desire for autonomy.