Enter a player name to begin or load your saved progress.
The 1790 Census categorized inhabitants solely based on age and sex, without any distinctions related to free status or color.
Answer: False
Explanation: The 1790 Census classified inhabitants into categories including 'free white males aged 16 years and over,' 'free white males under 16 years,' 'free white females,' 'all other free persons (reported by sex and color),' and 'slaves'.
The specific categorization of 'free white males aged 16 and over' in the 1790 census was primarily intended to assess the nation's potential military strength.
Answer: True
Explanation: The enumeration of 'free white males aged 16 and over' in the 1790 census served the purpose of gauging the country's industrial and military capacity at its inception.
George Washington and Thomas Jefferson expressed confidence that the 1790 census accurately captured the entire U.S. population without any undercount.
Answer: False
Explanation: Historical accounts suggest that President George Washington and Secretary of State Thomas Jefferson harbored concerns about potential undercounts in the 1790 census, citing factors such as population dispersion and potential respondent reluctance.
The 1850 census introduced significant methodological changes, including listing individuals rather than heads of households and employing specific color markings like 'B' for Black and 'M' for Mulatto.
Answer: True
Explanation: The 1850 census represented a methodological advancement by enumerating each free person individually and utilizing specific color notations, such as 'B' for Black and 'M' for Mulatto, on separate questionnaires for free inhabitants and slaves.
The 1840 census faced criticism for allegedly undercounting enslaved Black Americans.
Answer: False
Explanation: The controversy surrounding the 1840 census primarily concerned claims made about the rates of insanity and idiocy among free Black Americans in the Northern states, rather than an undercount of enslaved individuals.
The 1890 census was the first to differentiate between various Asian ethnic groups, such as Japanese and Chinese.
Answer: True
Explanation: Due to increased immigration from specific regions, the 1890 census marked an effort to distinguish between distinct Asian ethnic groups, including Chinese and Japanese populations.
The 1790 U.S. Census categorized inhabitants into several groups. Which category was specifically intended to assess the nation's industrial and military potential?
Answer: Free white males aged 16 years and over
Explanation: The category 'free white males aged 16 years and over' in the 1790 census was specifically included to provide an estimate of the nation's potential industrial and military workforce.
What significant change in data collection methodology was introduced in the 1850 census?
Answer: Individuals were listed separately, not just by head of household, and specific color markings were used.
Explanation: The 1850 census marked a significant methodological shift by enumerating each free person individually, rather than by household head, and introducing specific color notations like 'B' for Black and 'M' for Mulatto.
The 1840 census faced controversy primarily because it:
Answer: Claimed free Black Americans had higher rates of insanity than enslaved Black Americans.
Explanation: The primary controversy surrounding the 1840 census stemmed from its assertion that free Black individuals in the Northern states exhibited higher rates of 'insane' or 'idiotic' behavior compared to enslaved Black individuals.
The 1840 census controversy regarding Black Americans stemmed from claims about their rates of:
Answer: Insane or idiotic behavior
Explanation: The controversy surrounding the 1840 census involved claims regarding elevated rates of 'insane or idiotic behavior' among free Black Americans in the Northern United States.
The 1890 census began differentiating Asian ethnic groups primarily due to:
Answer: Increased immigration from specific Asian regions.
Explanation: The differentiation of Asian ethnic groups in the 1890 census was largely a response to the growing influx of immigrants from various Asian regions.
In the 1930 census, the 'Mulatto' classification was widely used for individuals with any known African ancestry.
Answer: False
Explanation: The 1930 census instructions directed enumerators to discontinue the use of the 'Mulatto' classification. Individuals with any known African ancestry, including those with mixed white and Black heritage, were to be recorded as 'Negro'.
'Mexican' was listed as a racial category in the U.S. Census for the first and only time in 1930.
Answer: True
Explanation: The 1930 U.S. Census uniquely included 'Mexican' as a racial category, instructing enumerators to classify individuals born in or whose parents were born in Mexico under this designation.
In 1940, U.S. government policy classified people of Mexican descent as 'White' to align with the 'Good Neighbor policy'.
Answer: True
Explanation: Influenced by President Franklin D. Roosevelt's 'Good Neighbor policy,' the U.S. government classified individuals of Mexican descent as 'White' in the 1940 census to foster improved diplomatic relations and reduce discrimination.
The Census Bureau's data played a role in the internment of Japanese Americans during World War II.
Answer: True
Explanation: Although initially denied, historical evidence confirmed in 2007 that data collected by the Census Bureau was utilized in the internment process of Japanese Americans during World War II.
In the 1930 census, individuals with mixed black and American Indian ancestry were classified as 'American Indian' if they were predominantly of that lineage.
Answer: False
Explanation: The 1930 census instructions stipulated that individuals with mixed Black and American Indian ancestry were to be classified as 'Negro' unless they were considered predominantly American Indian and accepted as such by their community.
The term 'Negro' was removed from U.S. Census forms by the year 2000.
Answer: False
Explanation: The term 'Negro' was removed from U.S. Census forms for the 2000 Census, but its usage persisted in earlier censuses, with 'Black or African Am.' becoming the standard term later.
The 1910 census collected information on the 'mother tongue' to understand the language diversity among foreign-born individuals and their children.
Answer: True
Explanation: The 1910 census included a question regarding 'mother tongue' to gather data on the linguistic diversity present within the foreign-born population and their offspring.
The 'one-drop rule' applied in the 1930 census meant that any known white ancestry would override black classification.
Answer: False
Explanation: The 'one-drop rule' as applied in the 1930 census operated conversely: any known Black ancestry mandated classification as 'Negro,' regardless of the proportion of white lineage.
The 1940 census classification of people of Mexican descent as white was intended to foster better diplomatic relations with Mexico.
Answer: True
Explanation: Classifying individuals of Mexican descent as 'White' in the 1940 census was a policy decision aimed at improving diplomatic relations with Mexico under the framework of the 'Good Neighbor policy'.
The 1910 census Indian Population Schedule asked about the proportion of white and black lineage but not American Indian lineage.
Answer: False
Explanation: The 1910 census Indian Population Schedule inquired about the proportion of lineage that was white, black, or American Indian, thus including American Indian lineage.
The term 'Negro' was consistently used in U.S. Census forms from 1790 until its removal in 2020.
Answer: False
Explanation: The term 'Negro' was not used in the 1790 census and was removed from census forms prior to 2020. Terminology evolved over time, including 'Black' and 'African American'.
The 1930 census primary change regarding mixed-race individuals with black ancestry was to classify them as 'Mulatto' if they had any white lineage.
Answer: False
Explanation: The 1930 census instructions mandated the discontinuation of the 'Mulatto' classification. Individuals with any known Black ancestry, including mixed Black and White lineage, were to be classified as 'Negro'.
Which of the following statements accurately describes the 'Mulatto' classification in the 1930 Census?
Answer: Enumerators were instructed to stop using it and classify mixed-ancestry individuals as 'Negro'.
Explanation: In 1930, census instructions mandated the cessation of the 'Mulatto' classification; individuals with any known Black ancestry were to be recorded as 'Negro', reflecting the 'one-drop rule'.
For what reason was 'Mexican' listed as a race in the 1930 U.S. Census?
Answer: It was a temporary classification for individuals of Mexican origin, appearing only in that census.
Explanation: The inclusion of 'Mexican' as a racial category in the 1930 census was a unique and temporary measure, intended to classify individuals of Mexican origin during that specific enumeration.
How did U.S. government policy in 1940 affect the census classification of people of Mexican descent?
Answer: They were uniformly classified as 'White' to improve relations with Mexico.
Explanation: In alignment with the 'Good Neighbor policy,' U.S. government policy in 1940 led to the uniform classification of people of Mexican descent as 'White' in the census to foster positive relations with Mexico.
What role did the Census Bureau's data play concerning Japanese Americans during World War II?
Answer: The data was used to identify and facilitate their internment.
Explanation: Census Bureau data was utilized in the identification and subsequent internment of Japanese Americans during World War II, a fact later substantiated by historical evidence.
What was the primary classification for individuals with mixed black and American Indian ancestry in the 1930 Census?
Answer: Negro
Explanation: According to 1930 census instructions, individuals with mixed Black and American Indian ancestry were classified as 'Negro' unless they were predominantly American Indian and accepted as such by their community.
Which term was used in the 1900 and 1930 U.S. Censuses to classify Black individuals, before evolving to 'Black' later?
Answer: Negro or Negro descent
Explanation: The term 'Negro' or 'Negro descent' was explicitly used in the 1900 and 1930 U.S. Censuses for the classification of Black individuals, preceding later terminology like 'Black' or 'African American'.
How did the 1910 census gather information about American Indians' lineage?
Answer: By asking about the proportion of their lineage that was white, black, or American Indian.
Explanation: The 1910 census Indian Population Schedule collected information on lineage by asking individuals to report the proportion of their ancestry that was white, black, or American Indian.
The 1930 census instructions regarding the 'Mulatto' classification stipulated they should be recorded as 'Negro' unless:
Answer: They identified primarily as American Indian and were accepted as such by their community.
Explanation: In the 1930 census, individuals with mixed Black and American Indian ancestry were to be classified as 'Negro' unless they were predominantly American Indian and recognized as such by their community.
What was the historical progression of terminology used to classify Black individuals in the U.S. Census, according to the source?
Answer: Other free persons -> Black/Mulatto -> Negro -> Black or African Am.
Explanation: The terminology for classifying Black individuals in the U.S. Census evolved from 'other free persons' and 'slaves' in 1790, through 'Black/Mulatto' (1850-1880), 'Negro' (1900-1970), to 'Black or African Am.' by 2020.
The 1930 census instructions regarding the 'Mulatto' classification indicated that:
Answer: It should no longer be used, and mixed individuals should be classified as 'Negro'.
Explanation: The 1930 census instructions stipulated that the 'Mulatto' classification should be discontinued, and individuals with mixed Black ancestry should be recorded as 'Negro'.
How did the 1940 census classification of people of Mexican descent align with President Roosevelt's policy?
Answer: It classified them as 'White' to improve relations under the 'Good Neighbor policy'.
Explanation: The 1940 census classified individuals of Mexican descent as 'White,' a decision aligned with President Roosevelt's 'Good Neighbor policy' aimed at fostering positive relations with Mexico.
Prior to the 1970 Census, who was responsible for assigning a person's race?
Answer: True
Explanation: From the inaugural U.S. Census in 1790 through the 1960 Census, government enumerators were tasked with assigning the race of each individual counted.
The transition to racial self-identification in the U.S. Census was primarily influenced by legislative changes related to civil rights, not economic policies of the 1960s.
Answer: True
Explanation: The shift towards allowing individuals to self-identify their race, beginning with the 1970 Census, was significantly influenced by the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and the Voting Rights Act of 1965, which aimed to improve data accuracy and address systemic inequalities.
Since the 1980 Census, race and ethnicity have been collected as a single, combined category.
Answer: False
Explanation: Beginning with the 1980 Census, race and ethnicity have been collected as separate, distinct categories. Respondents are asked to identify their race(s) and separately indicate whether they are of 'Hispanic or Latino' origin or 'Not Hispanic or Latino'.
The 1970 census included 'Korean' as a racial option and counted East Indians as 'Asian'.
Answer: False
Explanation: In the 1970 census, 'Korean' was indeed re-added as a racial option. However, individuals from the Indian subcontinent (East Indians) were classified as 'White,' not 'Asian'.
The 1990 census was designed to accurately capture multiple racial write-in responses by coding them based on all mentioned races.
Answer: False
Explanation: The 1990 census did not effectively capture multiple racial write-in responses. When individuals provided multiple identities, the response was coded based solely on the first race mentioned, limiting the accurate representation of multiracial identities.
The American Anthropological Association recommended combining race and ethnicity into a single category for the census in 1997.
Answer: True
Explanation: In 1997, the American Anthropological Association proposed that the OMB combine race and ethnicity into a singular 'race/ethnicity' question, arguing for clearer definitions and better respondent understanding.
The OMB's 1997 decision to allow multiple race selections was primarily driven by a desire to simplify data processing.
Answer: False
Explanation: The OMB's 1997 decision to permit multiple race selections was motivated by evidence of increasing multiracial populations and a need to accurately capture this diversity, rather than solely by data processing simplification.
The 1970 census sample questionnaire included questions about origin or descent. Which of the following was listed as a specific option?
Answer: Mexican
Explanation: The 1970 census sample questionnaire included specific options for origin or descent, among which 'Mexican' was listed, alongside Puerto Rican, Cuban, Central/South American, and Other Spanish.
The OMB's 1997 revisions aimed to standardize race and ethnicity data collection across states for local program implementation.
Answer: False
Explanation: The primary purpose of the OMB's 1997 revisions was to establish consistent federal data standards for race and ethnicity collection, primarily to ensure effective enforcement of civil rights laws across federal agencies, not specifically for state-level program implementation.
In the 1990 census, if an individual wrote 'white-black', the response was coded as 'white'.
Answer: True
Explanation: The 1990 census coding procedure for multiple racial write-in responses assigned the code based on the order of mention. Thus, 'white-black' would be coded as 'white', while 'black-white' would be coded as 'black'.
Which legislative acts were key influences in the U.S. Census shifting to allow individuals to self-identify their race starting in 1970?
Answer: The Civil Rights Act of 1964 and the Voting Rights Act of 1965.
Explanation: The landmark Civil Rights Act of 1964 and the Voting Rights Act of 1965 were pivotal legislative influences that spurred the U.S. Census to adopt self-identification for race beginning in 1970.
What change occurred in the U.S. Census starting in 1980 regarding race and ethnicity?
Answer: Race and ethnicity were collected as separate, distinct categories.
Explanation: Commencing with the 1980 Census, race and ethnicity were treated as separate data points. Respondents were asked to identify their race(s) and, distinctly, whether they were 'Hispanic or Latino' or 'Not Hispanic or Latino'.
In the 1970 Census, how were individuals from the Indian subcontinent (East Indians) classified?
Answer: As 'White'
Explanation: During the 1970 Census, individuals originating from the Indian subcontinent, often referred to as East Indians, were categorized under the 'White' racial classification.
How did the 1990 Census handle write-in responses for race when an individual marked the 'other' category and provided multiple racial identities?
Answer: The response was assigned based on the first race mentioned in the write-in.
Explanation: In the 1990 Census, when multiple racial identities were provided in the 'other' category, the response was coded based on the first race listed by the respondent, limiting the capture of complex identities.
What recommendation did the American Anthropological Association make in 1997 regarding census categories?
Answer: To combine 'race' and 'ethnicity' into a single 'race/ethnicity' question.
Explanation: In 1997, the American Anthropological Association recommended that the OMB consolidate race and ethnicity into a single 'race/ethnicity' question, citing definitional ambiguities and respondent perceptions.
The OMB's 1997 decision to allow multiple race selections was based on which rationale?
Answer: Evidence of increasing mixed-race populations and a need to record diversity.
Explanation: The OMB's 1997 decision to permit multiple race selections was primarily motivated by evidence of a growing multiracial population and the necessity to accurately document this diversity, responding to public demand.
How did the 1990 census handle write-in responses like 'black-white' versus 'white-black' when marking the 'other' race category?
Answer: 'black-white' was coded as 'black', and 'white-black' was coded as 'white'.
Explanation: In the 1990 census, the coding of multiple racial write-in responses was determined by the order of mention; 'black-white' was coded as 'black', whereas 'white-black' was coded as 'white'.
What was the primary purpose of the OMB's 1997 revisions to federal data standards on race and ethnicity?
Answer: To establish consistent data collection across federal agencies for civil rights enforcement.
Explanation: The primary objective of the OMB's 1997 revisions to federal data standards on race and ethnicity was to ensure consistency across federal agencies, particularly for the enforcement of civil rights legislation.
The 1990 census's handling of multiple racial write-in responses, coding only the first mentioned, highlights a limitation in:
Answer: Capturing the complexity of multiracial identities.
Explanation: The 1990 census methodology, which coded only the first mentioned race from multiple write-in responses, demonstrated a significant limitation in accurately capturing the complexity of multiracial identities.
The 2000 Census marked the first instance where individuals were permitted to identify with more than one race.
Answer: True
Explanation: The 2000 Census was the first to allow respondents to select multiple racial categories, a change implemented following the OMB's 1997 revisions to better reflect the diversity of the U.S. population.
The ability to select multiple races in the 2000 Census means its racial data is directly comparable to all previous censuses.
Answer: False
Explanation: The introduction of multiple race selections in the 2000 Census renders its racial data not directly comparable to data from prior censuses, necessitating careful methodological considerations when analyzing trends over time.
In the 2000 Census, the definition of 'White' included people with origins in Europe, the Middle East, or North Africa.
Answer: True
Explanation: The 2000 Census defined the 'White' category to encompass individuals with origins in Europe, the Middle East, or North Africa, explicitly including groups such as Arab and Polish populations.
The 2010 Census explicitly stated that Hispanic origins should be considered a race.
Answer: False
Explanation: The 2010 Census clarified the distinction between Hispanic origin and race by explicitly stating, 'For this census, Hispanic origins are not races,' thereby reinforcing that Hispanic ethnicity is separate from racial classification.
The 2020 Census was the first to include Middle Eastern North African (MENA) as a distinct racial category on the main form.
Answer: False
Explanation: While the 2020 Census provided options for Middle Eastern or North African (MENA) origins, it was primarily as a write-in option within the 'White' racial category, not as a distinct primary category on the main form.
The coronavirus pandemic and related operational delays were identified as factors contributing to miscounts in the 2020 Census.
Answer: True
Explanation: The 2020 Census experienced challenges including the coronavirus pandemic and subsequent operational delays, which were cited as contributing factors to potential miscounts and enumeration difficulties.
OMB revisions in March 2024 proposed combining race and ethnicity questions and adding a distinct MENA category.
Answer: True
Explanation: Proposed revisions by the OMB in March 2024 included integrating race and ethnicity into a single question and establishing a distinct Middle Eastern or North African (MENA) category.
The 'Some other race' category in the 2010 Census was officially recognized as a distinct racial group by the Census Bureau.
Answer: False
Explanation: The 'Some other race' category in the 2010 Census was not officially recognized as a distinct race but was utilized by various groups to specify their unique ethnic or national backgrounds, often encouraged by advocacy campaigns.
The 2010 Census modified the Hispanic origin question to explicitly state that Hispanic origins are not races.
Answer: True
Explanation: To clarify the distinction, the 2010 Census included the explicit statement, 'For this census, Hispanic origins are not races,' alongside modifications to the Hispanic origin question.
The 2020 Census updated the 'Some Other Race' category instructions to prompt users to print their specific race or origin.
Answer: True
Explanation: In the 2020 Census, the instructions for the 'Some Other Race' category were revised to prompt respondents to 'Print race or origin,' aligning with the overall instruction to mark one or more boxes and provide specific origins.
The Census Bureau defines 'Hispanic or Latino' as a person whose origins are exclusively from Spain.
Answer: False
Explanation: The Census Bureau defines 'Hispanic or Latino' broadly to include persons of Cuban, Mexican, Puerto Rican, South or Central American, or other Spanish culture or origin, not exclusively from Spain.
The 2000 Census Quality Survey was primarily designed to assess the accuracy of population counts in rural areas.
Answer: False
Explanation: The primary purpose of the 2000 Census Quality Survey was to evaluate the accuracy of race and Hispanic origin reporting and to develop methodologies for comparing data across different census years.
Michael Wines of The New York Times cited the migration of college students as a factor contributing to tally discrepancies in the 2020 Census.
Answer: True
Explanation: Journalist Michael Wines highlighted the movement of college students, particularly their return home due to the pandemic, as a factor complicating accurate enumeration in the 2020 Census.
The OMB's review of guidelines aimed to move MENA identities from the 'White' category to a new, separate classification.
Answer: True
Explanation: The OMB's review process considered reclassifying Middle Eastern or North African (MENA) identities, moving them from the existing 'White' category to a distinct classification, acknowledging that many individuals in these communities do not self-identify as White.
Prior to the 2000 Census, the 'Some other race' category was considered an official race by the Census Bureau.
Answer: False
Explanation: The 'Some other race' category was not officially recognized as a distinct race by the Census Bureau prior to the 2000 Census; rather, it served as a residual category for individuals whose identities did not fit established classifications.
A 2015 Rutgers University study suggested that Arab populations might benefit from a separate census category due to socioeconomic differences compared to White populations.
Answer: True
Explanation: A 2015 study conducted by Rutgers University indicated that significant socioeconomic disparities between Arab and White populations might warrant the creation of a distinct census category for Arab individuals.
The 2010 Census table on coverage error indicated a significant undercount for the 'Non-Hispanic White alone' category.
Answer: True
Explanation: Analysis of the 2010 Census coverage error indicated statistically significant differences from zero for the 'Non-Hispanic White alone' category, suggesting potential undercounts or overcounts compared to demographic estimates.
What was a major consequence of allowing respondents to select multiple races starting in the 2000 Census?
Answer: It made data from 2000 not directly comparable to data from prior censuses.
Explanation: A significant consequence of permitting multiple race selections in the 2000 Census was the disruption of direct comparability with data from earlier censuses, necessitating careful interpretation of longitudinal trends.
Which group(s) were included in the definition of 'White' for the 2000 U.S. Census?
Answer: People with origins in Europe, the Middle East, or North Africa.
Explanation: The 2000 Census definition of 'White' encompassed individuals with origins in Europe, the Middle East, or North Africa, explicitly including populations such as Arab and North African communities.
How did the 2010 Census attempt to clarify the distinction between Hispanic origin and race?
Answer: By adding the statement, 'Hispanic origins are not races'.
Explanation: The 2010 Census explicitly stated 'Hispanic origins are not races' and modified the Hispanic origin question to 'Hispanic, Latino or Spanish origin' to clearly differentiate ethnicity from racial categories.
The 2020 Census was notable for including Middle Eastern North African (MENA) responses in what way?
Answer: As a write-in option specifically within the White racial category.
Explanation: The 2020 Census allowed for Middle Eastern North African (MENA) responses, primarily through a write-in option integrated within the 'White' racial category, reflecting ongoing discussions about MENA classification.
Factors such as the coronavirus pandemic and operational delays were cited as contributing to which issue in the 2020 Census?
Answer: Miscounting of certain demographic groups.
Explanation: The 2020 Census faced challenges including the pandemic and operational delays, which were identified as factors contributing to the miscounting of specific demographic groups.
What did the OMB's proposed revisions in 2023 and March 2024 include regarding race and ethnicity data standards?
Answer: A combined question for race and ethnicity, plus a MENA category.
Explanation: Proposed OMB revisions in 2023 and March 2024 included integrating race and ethnicity into a single question and introducing a distinct Middle Eastern or North African (MENA) category.
What was the significance of the 'Some other race' category in the 2010 Census?
Answer: It was not an official race, but used by groups to indicate specific ethnic backgrounds.
Explanation: In the 2010 Census, the 'Some other race' category, while not an official race, was utilized by various groups, including Arab Americans and non-Hispanic West Indian Americans, to specify their distinct ethnic or national origins.
What did the 2015 Rutgers University study suggest regarding Arab populations and census classification?
Answer: That socioeconomic differences might justify a separate census category for Arab populations.
Explanation: The 2015 Rutgers University study proposed that disparities in socioeconomic indicators between Arab and White populations could provide justification for establishing a distinct census category for Arab individuals.
What does the Census Bureau define as 'Hispanic or Latino'?
Answer: A person of Cuban, Mexican, Puerto Rican, South or Central American, or other Spanish culture or origin.
Explanation: The Census Bureau defines 'Hispanic or Latino' as encompassing individuals of Cuban, Mexican, Puerto Rican, South or Central American, or other Spanish culture or origin, irrespective of their racial classification.
Michael Wines of The New York Times cited which specific type of location as having significant tally discrepancies in the 2020 Census?
Answer: Group quarters like college dormitories and prisons
Explanation: Michael Wines identified group quarters, such as college dormitories and correctional facilities, as locations experiencing significant tally discrepancies in the 2020 Census enumeration.
Which census was the first to specifically solicit Middle Eastern North African (MENA) responses?
Answer: 2020 Census
Explanation: The 2020 Census was the first to explicitly solicit Middle Eastern North African (MENA) responses, primarily through a write-in option within the 'White' category.
What was the primary reason cited for the decline in Mexican immigration to the U.S. after 2007?
Answer: Shifts in political authority and policy changes, including pandemic-related effects.
Explanation: The decline in Mexican immigration post-2007 is attributed to shifts in political landscapes, policy modifications, and the impact of events such as the coronavirus pandemic, which influenced legal residency and border apprehensions.
What was the purpose of the 2000 Census Quality Survey?
Answer: To assess the accuracy of race and Hispanic origin reporting and develop comparative methods.
Explanation: The 2000 Census Quality Survey was designed to evaluate the precision of race and Hispanic origin reporting and to establish methods for comparing this data with that from previous censuses.
The 2000 Census definition of 'White' included people with origins from which regions?
Answer: Europe, the Middle East, or North Africa
Explanation: The 2000 Census definition of 'White' encompassed individuals with origins in Europe, the Middle East, or North Africa.
The definition and selection of self-identified racial and ethnic categories for inclusion in the U.S. Census are determined collaboratively by which two governmental bodies?
Answer: The U.S. Census Bureau and the Office of Management and Budget (OMB)
Explanation: The U.S. Census Bureau, in conjunction with the Office of Management and Budget (OMB), is responsible for establishing the set of self-identified racial and ethnic categories presented to respondents for selection.
Contrary to scientific or anthropological classifications, how does the U.S. Census Bureau define racial categories?
Answer: False
Explanation: The U.S. Census Bureau defines racial categories not as precise scientific or anthropological classifications, but as social and political constructs reflecting self-perception and societal recognition, incorporating social and cultural characteristics alongside ancestry.
Census data on race and ethnicity are primarily utilized for historical research and academic studies, with limited application in current policy.
Answer: False
Explanation: Census data on race and ethnicity are critical for numerous contemporary applications, including the enforcement of civil rights legislation, the administration of federal programs aimed at addressing disparities, legislative redistricting, and monitoring compliance with voting rights.
The American Anthropological Association recommended eliminating the term 'race' entirely from federal data standards, advocating for terms like 'ethnicity'.
Answer: True
Explanation: The American Anthropological Association has advocated for the removal of the term 'race' from federal data standards, positing that it is not a scientifically valid biological concept and suggesting the use of more appropriate terms such as 'ethnicity'.
According to the U.S. Census Bureau, how are racial categories defined?
Answer: As social and political constructs reflecting self-perception and societal recognition.
Explanation: The U.S. Census Bureau defines racial categories as social and political constructs that reflect self-perception and societal recognition, rather than as strict biological or genetic classifications.