Enter a player name to begin or load your saved progress.
René-Robert Cavelier, Sieur de La Salle, a prominent figure in 17th-century North American exploration, was primarily engaged as a French explorer and fur trader.
Answer: True
Explanation: The historical record confirms René-Robert Cavelier, Sieur de La Salle, was indeed a French explorer and fur trader whose activities were concentrated in North America during the 17th century.
René-Robert Cavelier was born in Rouen, France, on November 22, 1643.
Answer: True
Explanation: Biographical records confirm that René-Robert Cavelier was born in Rouen, France, on November 22, 1643.
Prior to his extensive explorations, Cavelier pursued studies with the Jesuits and subsequently emigrated to New France as a colonist.
Answer: True
Explanation: Historical accounts indicate that René-Robert Cavelier studied with the Jesuits and later traveled to New France in 1666, initially intending to establish himself as a colonist.
Cavelier departed the Jesuit order due to his appointment to lead a significant expedition to the Americas.
Answer: False
Explanation: Cavelier was released from the Jesuit order in 1667, citing moral weaknesses, not due to an appointment to lead an expedition. This departure allowed him to pursue his own ventures, including acquiring land and engaging in trade.
The title 'Sieur de La Salle' denoted that its holder was in command of a French military garrison.
Answer: False
Explanation: The title 'Sieur de La Salle' was a seigneurial title, indicating land ownership under the French feudal system, rather than a military command.
La Salle financed his ambitious ventures through the divestment of his holdings in the Lachine seigneury.
Answer: True
Explanation: To fund his extensive explorations and ventures, La Salle sold his interests in the Lachine seigneury, thereby acquiring the necessary capital.
René-Robert Cavelier, Sieur de La Salle, was married to Madeleine de Roybon d'Allonne, who was a colonist in New France.
Answer: False
Explanation: René-Robert Cavelier, Sieur de La Salle, never married. While Madeleine de Roybon d'Allonne was an early colonist in New France, she was not his wife.
The 'Récit d’un ami de l’abbé de Gallinée' is a primary source that presents conflicting accounts regarding La Salle's initial expeditions.
Answer: True
Explanation: The 'Récit d’un ami de l’abbé de Gallinée,' among other early accounts, contains information that can present conflicting narratives concerning the precise details and chronology of La Salle's early exploratory activities.
La Salle himself asserted in a letter to Intendant Talon that he had discovered the Ohio River.
Answer: False
Explanation: In a letter to Intendant Talon, La Salle described a fictitious river called the Baudrane, rather than claiming discovery of the Ohio River. This indicates a tendency towards embellishment or invention of geographical features in his correspondence.
Who was René-Robert Cavelier, Sieur de La Salle?
Answer: A French explorer and fur trader known for his North American expeditions.
Explanation: René-Robert Cavelier, Sieur de La Salle, was a prominent French explorer and fur trader recognized for his extensive expeditions throughout North America, particularly his exploration of the Mississippi River and the Great Lakes region.
Where was René-Robert Cavelier born?
Answer: Rouen, Kingdom of France
Explanation: René-Robert Cavelier, Sieur de La Salle, was born in Rouen, a significant port city in the Kingdom of France.
What circumstance led to La Salle's departure from the Jesuit order?
Answer: He was released after citing moral weaknesses and financial difficulties.
Explanation: René-Robert Cavelier was released from the Jesuit order in 1667, citing personal reasons including moral weaknesses and financial considerations, which allowed him to pursue secular endeavors.
How did La Salle secure the financial resources for his initial expeditions into unexplored territories?
Answer: By selling his interests in the Lachine seigneury.
Explanation: To finance his ambitious exploratory endeavors, La Salle liquidated his assets, specifically selling his holdings in the Lachine seigneury.
Which of the following statements is inaccurate regarding René-Robert Cavelier, Sieur de La Salle?
Answer: He died peacefully of old age in France.
Explanation: René-Robert Cavelier, Sieur de La Salle, was born in Rouen, France, explored the Mississippi to the Gulf, and never married. However, he did not die peacefully of old age; he was assassinated in Texas in 1687.
The title 'Sieur de La Salle' is best understood as:
Answer: A noble title indicating land ownership under the French feudal system.
Explanation: The title 'Sieur de La Salle' was a seigneurial designation in the French feudal system, signifying ownership of a landed estate (seigneurie), rather than a military rank or ecclesiastical office.
What significant historical source, crucial for understanding La Salle's early expeditions, was reportedly lost in 1756?
Answer: La Salle's own journal
Explanation: La Salle's personal journal, a potentially invaluable primary source for his expeditions, is documented as having been lost in 1756.
What was the primary motivation behind La Salle's decision to sell his interests in the Lachine seigneury?
Answer: To finance his ambitious expeditions into unexplored territories.
Explanation: La Salle divested himself of his Lachine seigneury holdings primarily to generate the substantial capital required to fund his extensive and costly expeditions into the North American interior.
What significant personal complication arose from La Salle's departure from the Jesuit order?
Answer: He had to reject his father's legacy, leaving him nearly destitute.
Explanation: Upon entering the Jesuit order, Cavelier was required to renounce his paternal inheritance, a decision that left him in a state of near destitution and significantly impacted his early financial independence.
La Salle's 1682 expedition successfully established a permanent French colony at the mouth of the Mississippi River.
Answer: False
Explanation: While La Salle's 1682 expedition reached the Gulf of Mexico and claimed the Mississippi River basin for France, it did not result in the establishment of a permanent colony at the river's mouth at that time. Subsequent attempts, such as the Texas expedition, aimed to establish such colonies but faced significant challenges.
Upon reaching the Gulf of Mexico in 1682, La Salle claimed the territory for Spain.
Answer: False
Explanation: La Salle claimed the territory for France in 1682, naming it La Louisiane in honor of King Louis XIV, not for Spain.
La Salle's expedition reached the Mississippi River in February 1682 and subsequently established Fort Prudhomme near present-day Vicksburg.
Answer: False
Explanation: La Salle's group reached the Mississippi River in February 1682 and established Fort Prudhomme, but this fort was located near present-day Memphis, Tennessee, not Vicksburg.
What significant territory did La Salle claim for France in 1682?
Answer: The Mississippi River basin, named La Louisiane.
Explanation: In 1682, upon reaching the Gulf of Mexico via the Mississippi River, La Salle claimed the entire river basin for France, naming it La Louisiane in honor of King Louis XIV.
How is La Salle's claim of Louisiana for France characterized in the historical sources?
Answer: A 'vain boast' that nonetheless pointed the way for future colonization.
Explanation: La Salle's claim of Louisiana is sometimes described as initially a 'vain boast' due to the practical difficulties in asserting it, yet it undeniably laid the conceptual groundwork for subsequent French colonial expansion in the region.
What was the primary significance of La Salle's 1682 expedition reaching the Gulf of Mexico?
Answer: It resulted in the claim of the entire Mississippi River basin for France.
Explanation: The expedition's arrival at the Gulf of Mexico in 1682 was significant as it allowed La Salle to formally claim the vast Mississippi River basin for France, a pivotal moment in French colonial ambitions in North America.
The Seneca tribe informed La Salle about a significant river, the Ohio, which they erroneously believed flowed into the Pacific Ocean.
Answer: False
Explanation: The Seneca tribe told La Salle about the Ohio River, but they believed it flowed into a western sea, not specifically the Pacific Ocean. This information was a catalyst for his exploration.
Fort Frontenac was primarily established to facilitate missionary endeavors among the Iroquois population.
Answer: False
Explanation: While missionary work was a component of French colonial efforts, Fort Frontenac's primary purpose was to control the lucrative fur trade in the Great Lakes region and serve as a defensive post.
René-Robert Cavelier and Henri de Tonti hold the distinction of being the first Europeans documented to have witnessed Niagara Falls in December 1678.
Answer: True
Explanation: La Salle and his associate Henri de Tonti are credited as the first Europeans to document their observation of Niagara Falls in December 1678.
The portage route situated at Lewiston, New York, was instrumental for La Salle in transiting goods around the Great Lakes.
Answer: False
Explanation: The portage route at Lewiston, New York, was crucial for bypassing Niagara Falls, not for general transit around the Great Lakes. It allowed for the movement of boats and supplies up the Niagara River.
Fort Miami was constructed by La Salle at the confluence of the St. Joseph River and Lake Michigan's western shore.
Answer: True
Explanation: La Salle established Fort Miami in November 1679 at the mouth of the St. Joseph River on the western side of Lake Michigan.
Fort Crèvecœur was erected near present-day Peoria, Illinois, with the objective of supporting the local Peoria tribe against Iroquois incursions.
Answer: True
Explanation: Fort Crèvecœur was built in January 1680 near Peoria, Illinois, to provide assistance to the Peoria tribe in their defense against the Iroquois.
Fort Saint-Louis of Illinois was established by La Salle and Tonti at Starved Rock on the Illinois River to solidify French control over the region.
Answer: True
Explanation: Between 1682 and 1683, La Salle and Henri de Tonti constructed Fort Saint-Louis of Illinois at Starved Rock on the Illinois River, serving as a strategic post to secure French interests.
What was the primary strategic purpose of Fort Frontenac?
Answer: To control the fur trade in the Great Lakes region and act as a defensive post.
Explanation: Fort Frontenac, established by Governor Frontenac and managed by La Salle, served as a critical hub for controlling the lucrative fur trade in the Great Lakes basin and functioned as a strategic defensive position.
What crucial geographical information did the Seneca tribe impart to La Salle, influencing his subsequent exploration plans?
Answer: Knowledge of a great river called the Ohio flowing to a western sea.
Explanation: The Seneca tribe provided La Salle with intelligence regarding the Ohio River, describing it as flowing towards a western sea, which significantly fueled his ambition to find a westward passage.
What was the strategic role of Fort Crèvecœur within La Salle's broader exploration plans?
Answer: It served as a base to assist the Peoria tribe against the Iroquois.
Explanation: Fort Crèvecœur was constructed near Peoria, Illinois, primarily to serve as a strategic outpost and to provide support to the local Peoria tribe in their conflicts with the Iroquois.
René-Robert Cavelier and Henri de Tonti are documented as the first Europeans to witness which significant natural landmark?
Answer: Niagara Falls
Explanation: La Salle and Henri de Tonti are credited with being the first Europeans to document their observation of Niagara Falls in December 1678.
The portage route at Lewiston, New York, was essential for La Salle's expeditions primarily to circumvent:
Answer: The rapids and cataract of Niagara Falls.
Explanation: The portage route at Lewiston, New York, was critical for La Salle's expeditions as it provided the necessary means to bypass the formidable rapids and the cataract of Niagara Falls, enabling the transport of supplies and vessels.
What action did La Salle take between 1682 and 1683 to consolidate French presence along the Illinois River?
Answer: He established Fort Saint-Louis of Illinois at Starved Rock.
Explanation: During the period of 1682-1683, La Salle, along with Henri de Tonti, established Fort Saint-Louis of Illinois at the strategic location of Starved Rock on the Illinois River, thereby reinforcing French territorial claims.
La Salle's initial vessel, the Frontenac, was lost during a storm on Lake Ontario in January 1679.
Answer: True
Explanation: The Frontenac, one of La Salle's early ships, met its end when it was lost in a storm on Lake Ontario in January 1679.
La Salle's ship, Le Griffon, vanished after its departure from Niagara carrying a valuable cargo of furs and has never been recovered.
Answer: True
Explanation: The ship Le Griffon, laden with furs, disappeared after departing Niagara in 1679 and remains lost to history.
Following La Salle's departure from Fort Crèvecœur to procure supplies, the garrison remained steadfastly loyal to Henri de Tonti.
Answer: False
Explanation: Upon La Salle's departure, the soldiers at Fort Crèvecœur mutinied, destroyed the fort, and exiled Henri de Tonti, demonstrating a lack of loyalty.
La Salle met his end through assassination by his lieutenant, Henri de Tonti, stemming from territorial disputes.
Answer: False
Explanation: La Salle was assassinated in 1687 by Pierre Duhaut and his followers, not by Henri de Tonti.
Potential wreckage of Le Griffon has been discovered near the Florida coast, though its authenticity remains subject to debate.
Answer: False
Explanation: Potential remains of Le Griffon have been investigated in the Great Lakes region (Lake Huron and Lake Michigan), not the Florida coast. The authenticity and location of its wreckage are still debated.
La Salle's personal journal, a vital record of his expeditions, was lost during a shipwreck in 1687.
Answer: False
Explanation: While La Salle's life ended in 1687, his personal journal was not lost in a shipwreck that year. It was reportedly lost much later, in 1756.
Which vessel, constructed by La Salle, disappeared following its initial voyage carrying a cargo of furs?
Answer: Le Griffon
Explanation: Le Griffon, a significant ship built by La Salle, vanished after its maiden voyage in 1679, carrying a valuable cargo of furs, and its fate remains unknown.
Who was responsible for the assassination of La Salle in 1687?
Answer: Pierre Duhaut
Explanation: René-Robert Cavelier, Sieur de La Salle, was assassinated on March 19, 1687, by Pierre Duhaut and his followers.
The principal objective of La Salle's 1684 expedition was the establishment of a French colony at the mouth of the St. Lawrence River.
Answer: False
Explanation: The 1684 expedition's primary goal was to establish a French colony at the mouth of the Mississippi River on the Gulf of Mexico, not the St. Lawrence River. This expedition ultimately led to the Texas settlement.
La Salle's ill-fated Texas expedition encountered significant difficulties, including pirate engagements, navigational errors, and the loss of vessels such as La Belle.
Answer: True
Explanation: The expedition to Texas was plagued by numerous setbacks, including pirate attacks, navigational inaccuracies, and the critical loss of ships, most notably La Belle, which sank in Matagorda Bay.
The French settlement established by La Salle in Texas was situated near present-day Houston.
Answer: False
Explanation: The French settlement established by La Salle in Texas was located near Matagorda Bay, in the vicinity of present-day Victoria, Texas, not Houston.
The Spanish military forces were responsible for the destruction of the French colony in Texas.
Answer: False
Explanation: The French colony in Texas was destroyed by Indigenous peoples (specifically, those speaking Karankawa), not by Spanish forces.
The discovery of the shipwreck La Belle in 1995 provided significant archaeological insights into La Salle's Texas colony.
Answer: True
Explanation: The recovery of La Salle's ship La Belle from Matagorda Bay in 1995 yielded a wealth of 17th-century artifacts, greatly enhancing our understanding of the ill-fated Texas settlement.
Artifacts recovered from the wreck of La Belle are officially owned by the state of Texas.
Answer: False
Explanation: Under international agreements, the artifacts recovered from La Belle belong to France, although they are managed and displayed by the Texas Historical Commission in various Texas museums.
The Texas Historical Commission has confirmed the identification of La Salle's ship L'Aimable within Matagorda Bay.
Answer: False
Explanation: While claims have been made regarding the discovery of L'Aimable's wreck, the Texas Historical Commission has not definitively confirmed its identity, suggesting the found wreckage may be from a different vessel.
Archaeological investigations at the Keeran Ranch site in Texas have yielded evidence corroborating the location of La Salle's Fort Saint Louis colony.
Answer: True
Explanation: Excavations at the Keeran Ranch site in Texas have uncovered artifacts, including French cannons, that support the identification of the location as the site of La Salle's Fort Saint Louis colony.
La Salle's 1684 expedition was intended to establish a French colony at the mouth of the Rio Grande River.
Answer: False
Explanation: The objective of the 1684 expedition was to establish a colony at the mouth of the Mississippi River, not the Rio Grande. The expedition's navigational errors led them to the coast of Texas.
What was the principal objective of La Salle's 1684 expedition that embarked from France?
Answer: To establish a French colony at the mouth of the Mississippi River on the Gulf of Mexico.
Explanation: The ambitious goal of the 1684 expedition was to establish a French colony strategically located at the mouth of the Mississippi River, thereby securing French claims on the Gulf Coast.
Where was the French settlement established during La Salle's ill-fated Texas expedition?
Answer: On the coast of Matagorda Bay, Texas.
Explanation: The French colony founded during La Salle's Texas expedition was situated on the coast of Matagorda Bay, Texas, near Garcitas Creek.
What was the ultimate fate of the French colony established in Texas?
Answer: It was destroyed by Indigenous peoples.
Explanation: The French colony in Texas met a tragic end in 1688 when it was destroyed by Indigenous peoples, specifically those speaking Karankawa, who killed the adult colonists and took children captive.
What fate befell La Salle's ship, La Belle?
Answer: It sank in Matagorda Bay, Texas.
Explanation: La Belle, one of the ships in La Salle's Texas expedition, sank in Matagorda Bay, Texas, contributing significantly to the failure of the colony.
The discovery of which shipwreck in 1995 significantly advanced the understanding of La Salle's ill-fated Texas colony?
Answer: La Belle
Explanation: The archaeological discovery and recovery of La Salle's ship La Belle in Matagorda Bay in 1995 provided critical material evidence and context for understanding the circumstances of the Texas colony.
Which Indigenous group is identified as having been responsible for the destruction of the French colony in Texas?
Answer: The Karankawa
Explanation: The historical accounts indicate that the Karankawa-speaking Indigenous peoples were responsible for the destruction of the French settlement in Texas.
Which statement accurately describes the ownership of artifacts recovered from the wreck of La Belle?
Answer: They are owned by the French government and displayed in Texas museums.
Explanation: Artifacts recovered from the wreck of La Belle are legally owned by the French Republic, pursuant to international maritime law and treaties. These artifacts are entrusted to the Texas Historical Commission for curation and exhibition in museums across Texas.
La Salle's strategic establishment of forts and cultivation of alliances with Native tribes were integral to French colonial policy in North America.
Answer: True
Explanation: La Salle's approach, involving the construction of forts and the formation of alliances with Indigenous peoples, became a cornerstone of French policy aimed at securing and expanding their territorial claims in North America.
The U.S. state of Louisiana owes its name to La Salle's proclamation of the territory for France.
Answer: True
Explanation: The name 'Louisiana' (La Louisiane) was bestowed by La Salle upon his claim of the Mississippi River basin for France in 1682, honoring King Louis XIV. This name persists today in the U.S. state.
A statue commemorating La Salle is prominently displayed in Chicago's financial district on LaSalle Street.
Answer: False
Explanation: While LaSalle Street in Chicago is named in his honor, a statue of La Salle is located in Lincoln Park, not the financial district. The street itself serves as a major memorial.
La Salle University's athletic teams are nicknamed the 'Explorers' due to a historical misconception linking the university's name to the French explorer.
Answer: True
Explanation: La Salle University, named after Saint Jean-Baptiste de La Salle, adopted the 'Explorers' nickname in 1932 after a sportswriter mistakenly believed the university was named in honor of the French explorer René-Robert Cavelier, Sieur de La Salle.
LaSalle Street in Chicago, a prominent financial center, is named in honor of the French explorer.
Answer: True
Explanation: LaSalle Street in Chicago, renowned for its financial institutions, is indeed named in tribute to René-Robert Cavelier, Sieur de La Salle.
How did La Salle's later expedition indirectly contribute to the United States' eventual claim over Texas?
Answer: His presence and subsequent events, like the Louisiana Purchase, created a putative claim.
Explanation: Although La Salle's colony failed, his expedition established a French presence in Texas. This historical claim, alongside the subsequent Louisiana Purchase from France in 1803, contributed to the complex geopolitical landscape that informed later U.S. territorial claims in the region.
How did La Salle University acquire the nickname 'Explorers' for its athletic teams?
Answer: A sportswriter mistakenly believed the university was named after the explorer, leading to the adoption of the nickname.
Explanation: The nickname 'Explorers' for La Salle University's athletic teams originated from a sportswriter's erroneous assumption in 1931 that the university was named in honor of the French explorer, rather than Saint Jean-Baptiste de La Salle.