Enter a player name to begin or load your saved progress.
The primary purpose of the Right to Information (RTI) Act, 2005, is to promote transparency and accountability in the functioning of public authorities.
Answer: True
Explanation: The Right to Information (RTI) Act, 2005, enacted by the Parliament of India, establishes a framework for citizens to access information held by public authorities, with the core objectives of promoting transparency and accountability in their functioning.
The RTI Act, 2005, mandates that public authorities must proactively publish certain categories of information.
Answer: True
Explanation: The RTI Act, 2005, mandates that public authorities must proactively disseminate specific categories of information, thereby promoting transparency and reducing the need for formal requests.
The primary purpose of the RTI Act, 2005, is to expedite government decision-making processes.
Answer: False
Explanation: The primary purpose of the RTI Act, 2005, is to foster transparency and accountability in public authorities, not to expedite government decision-making processes.
Public authorities are only required to publish information upon formal request.
Answer: False
Explanation: The RTI Act, 2005, mandates that public authorities must proactively publish certain categories of information, in addition to responding to formal requests.
What is the primary purpose of the Right to Information (RTI) Act, 2005 in India?
Answer: To promote transparency and accountability in the functioning of public authorities.
Explanation: The primary purpose of the RTI Act, 2005, is to establish a framework for citizens to access information held by public authorities, thereby promoting transparency and accountability in their functioning.
According to its long title, what is a key purpose of the RTI Act, 2005?
Answer: To establish a framework for citizens to access information held by public authorities.
Explanation: According to its long title, a key purpose of the RTI Act, 2005, is to establish a framework for citizens to access information held by public authorities.
Any citizen of India is eligible to request information from a 'public authority' under the RTI Act, 2005.
Answer: True
Explanation: Under the RTI Act, 2005, any citizen of India is eligible to request information from entities designated as 'public authorities,' which encompass government bodies and instrumentalities of the state.
The RTI Act, 2005, extends its provisions only to the northern states of India.
Answer: False
Explanation: The RTI Act, 2005, has nationwide applicability, extending its provisions to the entire territory of India, not exclusively to the northern states.
Only government employees are eligible to request information under the RTI Act.
Answer: False
Explanation: Eligibility to request information under the RTI Act extends to any citizen of India, not exclusively government employees.
All private companies are directly covered under the RTI Act, regardless of government funding.
Answer: False
Explanation: Private institutions and NGOs are generally not directly covered by the RTI Act unless they receive over 95% of their infrastructure funding from the government.
Who is eligible to request information under the RTI Act, 2005?
Answer: Any citizen of India
Explanation: Any citizen of India is eligible to request information from a 'public authority' under the RTI Act, 2005.
Under what condition are private institutions and NGOs generally covered by the RTI Act?
Answer: If they receive over 95% of their infrastructure funds from the government.
Explanation: Private institutions and NGOs are covered under the RTI Act if they receive over 95% of their infrastructure funds from the government.
Public authorities must respond to all RTI requests within 15 days of receiving them.
Answer: False
Explanation: Public authorities are generally required to respond to RTI requests within thirty days; however, requests involving a citizen's life and liberty must be addressed within 48 hours.
Citizens belonging to disadvantaged communities are exempt from paying the application fee for seeking information under the RTI Act.
Answer: True
Explanation: Citizens identified as belonging to disadvantaged communities are indeed exempt from paying the prescribed application fee when seeking information under the RTI Act.
If an RTI request involves the petitioner's life and liberty, the information must be provided within 48 hours.
Answer: True
Explanation: In cases where an RTI request pertains to a citizen's life and liberty, the public authority is mandated to provide the requested information within 48 hours.
What is the general timeframe for a public authority to respond to an information request under the RTI Act?
Answer: Within 30 days
Explanation: Public authorities are generally required to respond to RTI requests within thirty days of receipt.
If an RTI request involves a citizen's life and liberty, within what timeframe must the information be provided?
Answer: 48 hours
Explanation: If an RTI request involves a citizen's life and liberty, the information must be provided within 48 hours.
If a citizen is dissatisfied with a PIO's response, where should the first appeal be filed?
Answer: With the First Appellate Authority within the public authority.
Explanation: If a citizen is dissatisfied with a PIO's response, the first appeal should be filed with the First Appellate Authority within the same public authority.
Who is exempt from paying the application fee for seeking information under the RTI Act?
Answer: Citizens belonging to disadvantaged communities
Explanation: Citizens identified as belonging to disadvantaged communities are exempt from paying the application fee for seeking information under the RTI Act.
What is the primary function of the RTI Portal?
Answer: To offer quick access to PIO/Appellate Authority details and disclosures.
Explanation: The RTI Portal serves as a gateway for citizens to efficiently locate information, including contact details for PIOs and Appellate Authorities, and access disclosures published by public authorities.
The 48-hour response timeframe under the RTI Act is triggered by requests involving:
Answer: A citizen's life and liberty
Explanation: The 48-hour response timeframe under the RTI Act is triggered by requests involving a citizen's life and liberty.
The Right to Information Act, 2005, replaced the Official Secrets Act, 1923.
Answer: False
Explanation: The Right to Information Act, 2005, replaced the Freedom of Information Act, 2002, not the Official Secrets Act, 1923. While it overrides provisions that restrict information disclosure, it did not directly replace the Official Secrets Act.
The RTI Bill was passed by the Indian Parliament on July 15, 2005.
Answer: False
Explanation: The RTI Bill was passed by the Indian Parliament on June 15, 2005, and the Act subsequently came into full force on October 12, 2005.
The Right to Information is explicitly listed as a Fundamental Right in Article 14 of the Indian Constitution.
Answer: False
Explanation: The Right to Information is not explicitly enumerated as a Fundamental Right in Article 14 or any other specific article of the Indian Constitution; rather, it is considered an implied fundamental right.
The Right to Information is considered an implied fundamental right derived from Article 19(1)(a) (Freedom of Expression) and Article 21 (Right to Life and Personal Liberty) of the Constitution.
Answer: True
Explanation: The Right to Information is recognized as an implied fundamental right, stemming from the constitutional guarantees of Freedom of Expression and Speech (Article 19(1)(a)) and the Right to Life and Personal Liberty (Article 21).
The RTI Act, 2005, overrides previous laws that restricted information disclosure, including the Official Secrets Act, 1923.
Answer: True
Explanation: The RTI Act, 2005, supersedes prior legislation that imposed restrictions on information disclosure, notably including the Official Secrets Act, 1923, thereby prioritizing the right to information.
The RTI Act, 2005, replaced the Freedom of Information Act, 1999.
Answer: False
Explanation: The Right to Information Act, 2005, replaced the Freedom of Information Act, 2002, not the 1999 Act.
The RTI Act, 2005, came fully into force on October 12, 2005.
Answer: True
Explanation: The Right to Information Act, 2005, was fully implemented on October 12, 2005, following its passage by the Parliament on June 15, 2005.
The Right to Information is explicitly listed as a Fundamental Right in Article 19(1)(a) of the Indian Constitution.
Answer: False
Explanation: While crucial for exercising Freedom of Expression (Article 19(1)(a)), the Right to Information is not explicitly listed as a Fundamental Right in that article but is considered an implied right.
The RTI Act, 2005, amended the Official Secrets Act, 1923, to allow greater disclosure.
Answer: False
Explanation: The RTI Act, 2005, overrides previous laws restricting information disclosure, including the Official Secrets Act, 1923, rather than directly amending it to allow greater disclosure.
Which legislation did the Right to Information Act, 2005 replace in India?
Answer: The Freedom of Information Act, 2002
Explanation: The Right to Information Act, 2005, replaced the earlier Freedom of Information Act, 2002, significantly expanding the provisions for citizens' access to information.
When did the RTI Act, 2005 fully come into force?
Answer: October 12, 2005
Explanation: The RTI Act, 2005, fully came into force on October 12, 2005.
How is the Right to Information considered in relation to the Indian Constitution?
Answer: It is an implied fundamental right derived from other guarantees.
Explanation: The Right to Information is considered an implied fundamental right derived from constitutional guarantees such as Freedom of Expression and the Right to Life and Personal Liberty, rather than being explicitly listed.
The RTI Act is considered crucial for exercising which fundamental rights?
Answer: Freedom of Speech and Expression, and Right to Life and Personal Liberty
Explanation: The RTI Act is crucial for exercising the fundamental rights to Freedom of Speech and Expression (Article 19(1)(a)) and the Right to Life and Personal Liberty (Article 21).
How does the RTI Act, 2005, interact with the Official Secrets Act, 1923?
Answer: The RTI Act overrides previous laws that restricted information disclosure, including the Official Secrets Act.
Explanation: The RTI Act, 2005, overrides previous laws that restricted information disclosure, including the Official Secrets Act, 1923.
Public Information Officers (PIOs) perform administrative functions only and do not have quasi-judicial powers.
Answer: False
Explanation: Public Information Officers (PIOs) and First Appellate Authorities under the RTI Act perform quasi-judicial functions, as they are involved in deciding on information requests and appeals, respectively.
The original RTI Act set the term for Information Commissioners at 7 years.
Answer: False
Explanation: The original RTI Act, 2005, stipulated a term of five years for Central and State Chief Information Commissioners and Information Commissioners, not seven years.
The final appeal for state government information lies with the Central Information Commission.
Answer: False
Explanation: The final appeal for information requests made to state government bodies lies with the respective State Information Commission (SIC), not the Central Information Commission (CIC).
What is the primary role of a Public Information Officer (PIO) under the RTI Act?
Answer: To receive and process information requests from citizens.
Explanation: The primary role of a Public Information Officer (PIO) under the RTI Act is to receive and process information requests from citizens.
What was the original term of office for Central and State Chief Information Commissioners under the RTI Act, 2005?
Answer: 5 years
Explanation: The original RTI Act, 2005, set the term of office for Central and State Chief Information Commissioners and Information Commissioners at five years.
Which two main bodies are responsible for governing the Right to Information in India?
Answer: Central Information Commission (CIC) and State Information Commissions (SICs)
Explanation: The two primary bodies governing the Right to Information in India are the Central Information Commission (CIC) for central departments and ministries, and the State Information Commissions (SICs) for state governments.
What is the scope of the Central Information Commission's (CIC) authority?
Answer: It heads central departments and ministries and is the final appellate authority for them.
Explanation: The Central Information Commission (CIC) oversees all central departments and ministries and their Public Information Officers (PIOs). It functions as the apex appellate authority for citizens' grievances concerning central government bodies.
If a citizen is unsatisfied with the decision of the First Appellate Authority at the state level, what is the next step?
Answer: File a second appeal with the State Information Commission (SIC).
Explanation: If a citizen is unsatisfied after appealing to the state-level appellate authority, they may escalate their appeal to the State Information Commission (SIC).
The RTI Act was significantly amended in 2010.
Answer: False
Explanation: The provided data indicates that the RTI Act was significantly amended in 2019, not 2010.
The Supreme Court of India upheld a decision confirming that the office of the Chief Justice of India falls under the purview of the RTI Act, 2005.
Answer: True
Explanation: The Supreme Court of India affirmed a Delhi High Court ruling, confirming that the office of the Chief Justice of India is subject to the provisions of the RTI Act, 2005.
The Central Information Commission (CIC) ruled that political parties are public authorities and are answerable to citizens under the RTI Act.
Answer: True
Explanation: The Central Information Commission (CIC) classified political parties as public authorities, deeming them answerable to citizens under the RTI Act due to their substantial indirect government funding and public functions.
The Right to Information (Amendment) Act, 2019, primarily affected Sections 5 and 10 of the original Act.
Answer: False
Explanation: The Right to Information (Amendment) Act, 2019, primarily targeted Sections 13, 16, and 27 of the original RTI Act, 2005, concerning the terms and conditions of service for Information Commissioners.
The Supreme Court ruled that the office of the Prime Minister is exempt from the RTI Act.
Answer: False
Explanation: The provided source material discusses the Supreme Court's ruling that the office of the Chief Justice of India falls under the purview of the RTI Act, but it does not contain information regarding the Prime Minister's office being exempt.
Which sections of the RTI Act, 2005, were primarily targeted by the Right to Information (Amendment) Act, 2019?
Answer: Sections 13, 16, and 27
Explanation: The Right to Information (Amendment) Act, 2019, primarily targeted Sections 13, 16, and 27 of the original RTI Act, 2005.
What did the Supreme Court rule regarding the office of the Chief Justice of India (CJI) and the RTI Act?
Answer: The CJI's office falls under the purview of the RTI Act.
Explanation: The Supreme Court upheld the Delhi High Court's decision, confirming that the office of the Chief Justice of India falls under the purview of the RTI Act, 2005.
What was the Central Information Commission's (CIC) decision regarding political parties?
Answer: Political parties are public authorities answerable under the RTI Act.
Explanation: The Central Information Commission (CIC) ruled that political parties are public authorities and are answerable to citizens under the RTI Act.
Which of the following organizations is explicitly mentioned in the provided source as being exempted under Section 24 of the RTI Act?
Answer: Narcotics Control Bureau (NCB)
Explanation: The Narcotics Control Bureau (NCB) is explicitly mentioned in the source as an organization exempted under Section 24 of the RTI Act.
What was the situation regarding the RTI Act in Jammu and Kashmir prior to the revocation of Article 370?
Answer: A separate J&K Right to Information Act was in force.
Explanation: Prior to the revocation of Article 370, a separate Jammu and Kashmir Right to Information Act was operative in the region.
Critics praised the 2019 amendment for strengthening the autonomy of Information Commissioners.
Answer: False
Explanation: Critics argued that the Right to Information (Amendment) Act, 2019, potentially compromised the autonomy of Information Commissioners by allowing the government to set their terms and salaries.
Approximately how many RTI applications are filed daily in India, based on the provided data?
Answer: Over 4,800
Explanation: Based on the provided data, over 4,800 RTI applications are filed daily in India.
What was a major criticism of the Right to Information (Amendment) Act, 2019?
Answer: It potentially compromised the independence of information commissions.
Explanation: A major criticism of the Right to Information (Amendment) Act, 2019, was that it potentially compromised the independence and autonomy of information commissions.
How have Intellectual Property rights been used in relation to the RTI Act?
Answer: As an argument by government agencies to deny information.
Explanation: Civil society members report that government agencies have invoked Intellectual Property rights arguments to subvert the RTI Act, citing examples such as the RBI denying information on demonetization and an irrigation department withholding project reports.
According to CHRI data mentioned in the source, what is the reported number of alleged murders linked to RTI applications?
Answer: Over 50
Explanation: According to Commonwealth Human Rights Initiative (CHRI) data, over 50 alleged murders have been linked to RTI applications.
What legislative protection has been suggested for RTI activists facing threats?
Answer: Mandatory registration of threats as FIRs and magistrate protection orders.
Explanation: Legislative protection suggested for RTI activists facing threats includes mandatory registration of threats as FIRs and magistrate protection orders.
How do activists generally view the impact of the RTI Act?
Answer: As a significant tool for empowering citizens and transforming governance.
Explanation: Activists generally view the RTI Act as a significant tool for empowering citizens and transforming governance towards greater transparency, reduced corruption, and increased accountability.