Enter a player name to begin or load your saved progress.
Running-fight games are primarily characterized by complex narrative structures and deep character development.
Answer: False
Explanation: This statement is inaccurate. Running-fight games are fundamentally defined by their combination of race game movement mechanics and elimination game objectives, not by narrative complexity or character development.
In running-fight games, capturing an opponent's piece typically results in that piece being sent back to the starting position.
Answer: False
Explanation: The capture mechanic in running-fight games involves the permanent removal of the opponent's piece from play, distinguishing it from the 'sending back' mechanism common in many race games.
The primary objective in a running-fight game is to reach the end of the track before any opponent.
Answer: False
Explanation: The primary objective in running-fight games is the complete capture and elimination of all opponent pieces, rather than reaching a finish line.
In running-fight games, pieces move along tracks determined solely by player strategy, without any element of chance.
Answer: False
Explanation: Movement in running-fight games typically involves an element of chance, such as dice rolls, to determine how pieces advance along the tracks, complementing strategic play.
The track structure in running-fight games typically features a clear finish line that players aim to cross first.
Answer: False
Explanation: Unlike many traditional race games, running-fight games often utilize continuous circuit tracks that lack a defined finish line, facilitating ongoing interaction and capture.
When a piece lands on an occupied space in a running-fight game, the opponent's piece is captured and returned to the owner's hand.
Answer: False
Explanation: In running-fight games, landing on an occupied space results in the opponent's piece being captured and permanently removed from play, not returned to the owner's hand or starting position.
The capture mechanic in running-fight games is identical to that found in games like Chess.
Answer: False
Explanation: While both Chess and running-fight games involve capturing opponent pieces, the specific mechanics differ. In Chess, pieces are removed from the board. In running-fight games, captured pieces are permanently eliminated from play, and the game's track structure and movement determination differ significantly from Chess.
The concept of 'running-fight' accurately describes games where players race to collect items without any player interaction.
Answer: False
Explanation: The term 'running-fight' implies both movement ('running') and conflict ('fight'), specifically the capture of opponent pieces. Games solely focused on collecting items without interaction do not fit this definition.
Running-fight games are characterized by strategic combat on a grid, similar to Chess or Go.
Answer: False
Explanation: Running-fight games typically involve movement along linear tracks, often circuits, rather than strategic combat on a grid like Chess or Go. While they involve capturing, the overall gameplay structure is distinct.
The primary mechanism for determining piece movement in running-fight games involves dice rolls or similar randomizers.
Answer: True
Explanation: Piece movement in running-fight games is typically determined by random elements such as dice rolls, aligning with the mechanics found in race games.
The continuous circuit track design in running-fight games facilitates ongoing interaction and potential for captures throughout the game.
Answer: True
Explanation: The absence of a defined end point and the use of continuous circuits in running-fight games ensure that players remain engaged in interaction and potential captures throughout the duration of the game.
The core combination defining a running-fight game is the merging of race game movement with the objective of capturing opponent pieces.
Answer: True
Explanation: This accurately describes the fundamental definition: the integration of race game movement mechanics (often chance-based) with the elimination objective characteristic of games like Chess.
What is the fundamental characteristic that defines a running-fight game?
Answer: It combines the movement mechanics of race games with the objective of elimination games.
Explanation: The defining characteristic of a running-fight game is its synthesis of race game movement principles, often involving chance, with the strategic objective of capturing and eliminating opponent pieces, akin to elimination games.
How does the capture mechanic in running-fight games differ from typical race games?
Answer: In running-fight games, captured pieces are permanently removed from play, unlike many race games where they are simply sent back to the starting position.
Explanation: The primary distinction lies in the consequence of capture: in running-fight games, captured pieces are permanently eliminated. Conversely, many race games return captured pieces to the starting position rather than removing them entirely.
What is the primary winning condition in most running-fight games?
Answer: Capturing all of the opponent's pieces.
Explanation: The principal objective and winning condition in running-fight games is the complete elimination of all opponent pieces through capture.
What track characteristic allows continuous interaction in running-fight games?
Answer: Tracks often lack a defined end and consist of continuous circuits.
Explanation: The design of tracks as continuous circuits, rather than linear paths with a finish line, is crucial for enabling sustained player interaction and opportunities for capture throughout the game.
What role does chance, typically through dice, play in running-fight games?
Answer: It dictates how pieces advance along the linear tracks.
Explanation: Chance elements, such as dice rolls, are primarily employed in running-fight games to determine the movement distance or specific move of pieces along the game's tracks.
What is the significance of the term 'elimination-based games' in the definition of running-fight games?
Answer: It highlights the objective of capturing and permanently removing opponent pieces.
Explanation: The term 'elimination-based games' signifies that the core objective within running-fight games involves capturing and permanently removing the opponent's pieces from play.
What is the main difference between the track structure of running-fight games and many traditional race games?
Answer: Running-fight tracks usually lack a defined end, often being continuous circuits.
Explanation: A key difference is that running-fight games frequently employ continuous circuit tracks without a specific finish line, contrasting with many traditional race games that feature a defined endpoint.
Which aspect of Chess is mirrored in the objective of running-fight games?
Answer: Capturing opponent pieces.
Explanation: The objective of capturing opponent pieces, a central element in Chess, is also a fundamental aspect of the goal in running-fight games.
The definition of a running-fight game combines elements from which two broader categories of games?
Answer: Race games and elimination games
Explanation: Running-fight games are defined by the integration of mechanics from race games (movement along tracks, often with chance) and elimination games (capturing opponent pieces).
What is the primary difference highlighted between running-fight games and traditional race games regarding captured pieces?
Answer: In running-fight games, captured pieces are permanently eliminated; in race games, they are typically sent back to the start.
Explanation: The fundamental difference concerning captured pieces is that in running-fight games, they are permanently removed from play, whereas in traditional race games, they are usually sent back to the starting position.
Running-fight games are exclusively found in European cultures.
Answer: False
Explanation: While European examples exist, running-fight games are predominantly found in cultures influenced by Islam, spanning from West Africa to India, and also include pre-Columbian Mesoamerican games.
The geographical distribution of running-fight games is limited to North Africa and the Middle East.
Answer: False
Explanation: The distribution extends beyond North Africa and the Middle East, encompassing regions from West Africa to India within Islamic-influenced cultures, and also includes European and Mesoamerican examples.
Which of the following regions is NOT predominantly associated with the origin or prevalence of running-fight games?
Answer: Northern Europe
Explanation: While specific Nordic examples like Daldøs exist, the predominant association for running-fight games lies with cultures influenced by Islam (spanning West Africa to India), Mesoamerica, and specific European regions, not Northern Europe as a whole.
According to the source, where are running-fight games predominantly found?
Answer: Almost exclusively in cultures influenced by Islam.
Explanation: The source indicates that running-fight games are predominantly found within cultures influenced by Islam, with a geographical spread from West Africa to India.
Which of the following statements accurately reflects the geographical distribution mentioned for running-fight games?
Answer: Their range extends from West Africa across to India within Islamic-influenced cultures.
Explanation: The geographical distribution is described as extensive, primarily within Islamic-influenced cultures, spanning from West Africa eastward to India, alongside other regional examples.
The game Tâb is an example of a running-fight game found in Islamic-influenced cultures.
Answer: True
Explanation: The game Tâb is indeed cited as a running-fight game prevalent within Islamic-influenced cultures, and the family of games is sometimes collectively referred to by this name.
Daldøs/Daldøsa is a running-fight game originating from Iceland.
Answer: False
Explanation: Daldøs/Daldøsa is identified as a running-fight game, but its origin is cited as Denmark or Norway, not Iceland. Aðelta stelpur is the Icelandic example.
Sáhkku is a running-fight game associated with the Sami people.
Answer: True
Explanation: The game Sáhkku is correctly identified as a running-fight game associated with the Sami people.
The pre-Columbian Mesoamerican game known as Puluc is considered a type of running-fight game.
Answer: True
Explanation: Puluc, along with games like Bul and Boolik, is classified as a pre-Columbian Mesoamerican running-fight game.
Aðelta stelpur is the name of the running-fight game originating from Denmark or Norway.
Answer: False
Explanation: Aðelta stelpur is identified as a running-fight game, but its origin is cited as Iceland. Daldøs/Daldøsa is the game originating from Denmark or Norway.
The image caption for the game Bul indicates that captured pieces are placed back on the starting square.
Answer: False
Explanation: The image caption for Bul describes a distinct capture mechanic where captured pieces are stacked underneath the piece that captured them, not placed back on the starting square.
The game Sáhkku is an example of a running-fight game found in Iceland.
Answer: False
Explanation: Sáhkku is associated with the Sami people, not Iceland. The Icelandic running-fight game mentioned is Aðelta stelpur.
The game Bul, Boolik, and Puluc are examples of running-fight games from West Africa.
Answer: False
Explanation: Bul, Boolik, and Puluc are classified as pre-Columbian Mesoamerican running-fight games, not games originating from West Africa.
The game Sáhkku belongs to the running-fight category and is associated with which group?
Answer: The Sami people
Explanation: Sáhkku is identified as a running-fight game specifically associated with the Sami people.
Which of these is cited as a European example of a running-fight game?
Answer: Daldøs/Daldøsa
Explanation: Daldøs/Daldøsa is explicitly mentioned as a European running-fight game originating from Denmark or Norway.
How did the game Bul visually represent the capture of opponent pieces, according to the image caption?
Answer: Captured pieces were stacked underneath the piece that captured them.
Explanation: The image caption for Bul illustrates a specific capture mechanic wherein captured pieces are physically stacked beneath the piece that performed the capture.
The game Aðelta stelpur is identified as belonging to the running-fight family and originates from which country?
Answer: Iceland
Explanation: Aðelta stelpur is cited as a running-fight game originating specifically from Iceland.
Which of the following is a pre-Columbian Mesoamerican game classified as a running-fight game?
Answer: Puluc
Explanation: Puluc is identified as a pre-Columbian Mesoamerican game that falls under the classification of running-fight games.
The source mentions three European running-fight games. Which one is associated with Iceland?
Answer: Aðelta stelpur
Explanation: Among the European running-fight games mentioned, Aðelta stelpur is specifically identified as originating from Iceland.
The game Fang den Hut! is a modern descendant of running-fight games, potentially linked to the Mesoamerican game Bul.
Answer: True
Explanation: Fang den Hut! is identified as a modern game that belongs to the running-fight category and is potentially descended from the Mesoamerican game Bul, sharing similar capture mechanics.
Modern games like Coppit and Headache are considered descendants of running-fight games.
Answer: True
Explanation: Coppit and Headache are cited as modern games that are descendants of cross and circle games, and thus are classified within the running-fight game category.
The game Bul was described in English in 1907, potentially influencing later European games.
Answer: False
Explanation: The source indicates that Boolik (related to Bul) was described in English in 1907, and Puluc was described in German in 1906, suggesting potential influence on later European games like Fang den Hut!.
Thierry Depaulis wrote about Nordic running-fight games in Board Games Studies.
Answer: False
Explanation: Thierry Depaulis authored an article in Board Games Studies concerning race games in the Arab-Muslim world, not specifically Nordic running-fight games. Peter Michaelsen's article in the same volume focused on Daldøs.
Which modern game is suggested to potentially descend from the Mesoamerican game Bul, sharing its capture mechanic?
Answer: Fang den Hut!
Explanation: Fang den Hut! is proposed as a potential descendant of the Mesoamerican game Bul, notably sharing its distinctive capture mechanic.
The article by Thierry Depaulis in Board Games Studies (Volume 4, 2001) focuses on which running-fight game?
Answer: Tâb
Explanation: Thierry Depaulis's article in Board Games Studies (Volume 4, 2001) concerns race games within the Arab-Muslim world. Tâb is identified as a running-fight game found within this cultural sphere.
The relevance of Puluc's 1906 German publication is primarily that:
Answer: It provides evidence for the potential historical connection between Mesoamerican games and later European games like Fang den Hut!.
Explanation: The publication of Puluc's description in German in 1906, alongside Boolik's English publication in 1907, serves as evidence suggesting a potential historical link between Mesoamerican running-fight games and later European developments like Fang den Hut!.
Which publication details are provided for Robert Charles Bell's work on board games?
Answer: First published in 1960, revised in 1969, with a reprint in 1979.
Explanation: The provided details for Robert Charles Bell's 'Board and Table Games' indicate a first publication in 1960, a revised edition in 1969, and a reprint including volume 2 in 1979, published by Oxford University Press.
The game family is sometimes collectively referred to by the name 'Sig'.
Answer: False
Explanation: While 'Sig' is mentioned as a name associated with some games in the family, the collective name for the entire running-fight game family is often cited as 'Tâb games'.
The Navbox categorizes 'Running-fight game' under the broader classification of 'Card game'.
Answer: False
Explanation: The Navbox lists 'Running-fight game' under the broader category of 'Board game', indicating its classification as a type of tabletop game.
The term 'running-fight' implies a game focused solely on speed and distance covered.
Answer: False
Explanation: The term 'running-fight' encompasses both the 'running' aspect of movement along a track and the 'fight' aspect of capturing opponent pieces, indicating a combination of mechanics rather than solely speed.
Which game is mentioned as a common name for individual running-fight games, and also as a collective name for the entire family?
Answer: Tâb
Explanation: The game Tâb is noted as being both a specific example within the running-fight category and, in some contexts, used as a collective term for the entire family of such games.
Which of the following is NOT a name associated with games in the running-fight family?
Answer: Mancala
Explanation: Sig, Boolik, and Daldøsa are all associated with the running-fight game family. Mancala, however, represents a distinct category of games.
What is the significance of the Navbox listing 'Running-fight game' under 'Board game'?
Answer: They are considered a type of tabletop board game.
Explanation: The Navbox categorizes 'Running-fight game' under 'Board game', signifying its classification as a type of tabletop game.
What does the term 'running-fight' encapsulate about the gameplay?
Answer: A combination of continuous movement along a track and conflict involving piece capture.
Explanation: The term 'running-fight' aptly describes the gameplay, integrating the 'running' aspect of continuous movement on a track with the 'fight' aspect of engaging in conflict through piece capture.