Welcome!

Enter a player name to begin or load your saved progress.

Serfdom in Russia Wiki2Web Clarity Challenge

Study Hints Create Teach
Global Score: 0
Trophies: 0 🏆

‹ Back

Score: 0 / 100

Study Guide: Serfdom in Imperial Russia: Origins, Evolution, and Emancipation

Cheat Sheet:
Serfdom in Imperial Russia: Origins, Evolution, and Emancipation Study Guide

Nature of Serfdom and Social Structure

By the 19th century, legal distinctions between serfs and slaves in Russia had largely disappeared, making them practically indistinguishable in many aspects.

Answer: True

Explanation: The source indicates that by the 19th century, the requirement for serfs to be sold only with land largely ceased, rendering them practically indistinguishable from slaves in many respects, despite earlier legal distinctions.

Return to Game

Serfdom was most common in the northern and northeastern parts of the Russian Empire, where free peasants were rare.

Answer: False

Explanation: Serfdom was most common in the central and southern areas of the Tsardom of Russia. Free peasants were primarily found in the northern and northeastern parts of the country.

Return to Game

The term 'muzhik' is a Russian word that, when used in English, refers to a 'Russian noble.'

Answer: False

Explanation: The term 'muzhik' refers to a 'Russian peasant' in English literature, not a noble.

Return to Game

According to 17th-century censuses, approximately four-fifths of Russian peasants were serfs.

Answer: True

Explanation: Censuses from 1678 and 1719 confirm that approximately four-fifths of Russian peasants were indeed serfs.

Return to Game

*Dvorovie lyudi*, a class of serfs who could be sold without land, had no legal protections and could not file complaints against their landowners.

Answer: False

Explanation: *Dvorovie lyudi* possessed legal protections for their movable property, religious rights, and inviolability, and could file complaints against landowners.

Return to Game

Before the 1861 emancipation, state peasants and peasants under the Tsar's patronage were considered personally free and could not be sold.

Answer: True

Explanation: State peasants and 'udelnye krestiane' were indeed considered personally free and could not be sold, distinguishing them from privately owned serfs.

Return to Game

By the mid-19th century, private serfs constituted over 50% of the Russian Empire's total population.

Answer: False

Explanation: According to the 1857 census, private serfs constituted 37.7% of the total population, not over 50%.

Return to Game

What was the Russian term for an unfree peasant who was originally tied to the land?

Answer: Krepostnoy krest'yanin

Explanation: The Russian term 'krepostnoy krest'yanin' directly translates to 'bonded peasant' and refers to an unfree peasant tied to the land.

Return to Game

In which regions was serfdom rare until the reign of Catherine the Great?

Answer: Little Russia, other Cossack lands, the Urals, and Siberia

Explanation: Serfdom was rare in Little Russia, other Cossack lands, the Urals, and Siberia until Catherine the Great's reign.

Return to Game

What does the Russian term 'muzhik' refer to in English literature?

Answer: A Russian peasant

Explanation: The term 'muzhik' is used in English literature to refer to a Russian peasant.

Return to Game

According to 17th-century censuses, what proportion of Russian peasants were serfs?

Answer: Approximately four-fifths

Explanation: 17th-century censuses indicated that approximately four-fifths of Russian peasants were serfs.

Return to Game

What legal protection did *dvorovie lyudi* possess, despite being serfs who could be sold without land?

Answer: Their movable property, religious rights, and inviolability were officially protected.

Explanation: *Dvorovie lyudi* had legal protections for their movable property, religious rights, and personal inviolability, and could file complaints against landowners.

Return to Game

Before the Great Emancipation of 1861, how many Russians were estimated to be privately owned serfs?

Answer: 23 million

Explanation: Before 1861, an estimated 23 million Russians were privately owned serfs.

Return to Game

How did state peasants and 'udelnye krestiane' differ from privately owned serfs before 1861?

Answer: They were considered personally free and could not be sold.

Explanation: State peasants and 'udelnye krestiane' were considered personally free and could not be sold, unlike privately owned serfs.

Return to Game

According to the 1857 census, what percentage of the Russian Empire's total population consisted of private serfs?

Answer: 37.7%

Explanation: The 1857 census reported that private serfs constituted 37.7% of the Russian Empire's total population.

Return to Game

Imperial Policies and Attempts at Reform

Peter III's 1762 reforms included ending mandatory military service for nobles, which removed a key justification for their control over serfs.

Answer: True

Explanation: Peter III's 1762 reform ending mandatory military service for nobles indeed removed a primary justification for their landownership and control over serfs.

Return to Game

Catherine II completely abolished the cruel treatment of serfs by estate owners through a series of strict decrees in 1775.

Answer: False

Explanation: Catherine II took measures to prosecute cruel estate owners in 1775, but these were limited interventions, not a complete abolition of cruel treatment, which continued to be addressed in later decades.

Return to Game

Alexander I's reforms included liberating serfs in Estonia, Livonia, and Courland in the early 19th century.

Answer: True

Explanation: Alexander I did liberate serfs in Estonia (1816), Livonia (1816), and Courland (1817) as part of his early reforms.

Return to Game

Alexander I consistently expanded serf rights throughout his reign, never reversing any of his reforms.

Answer: False

Explanation: Alexander I reversed some of his reforms in 1822-23, forbidding serfs from complaining to authorities and restoring landlords' right to exile peasants to Siberia.

Return to Game

Nicholas I's 'decree on obliged peasants' in 1842 granted peasants full ownership of their plots upon emancipation, without further duties to the landlord.

Answer: False

Explanation: The 'decree on obliged peasants' granted peasants use of plots, not ownership, and they were still required to perform duties for the landlord.

Return to Game

Which two key measures did Peter III introduce in 1762 that indirectly influenced the abolition of serfdom?

Answer: He ended mandatory military service for nobles and secularized church estates.

Explanation: Peter III's 1762 reforms included ending mandatory military service for nobles and secularizing church estates, both indirectly impacting serfdom.

Return to Game

Which of the following was NOT a reform introduced by Alexander I concerning serfs?

Answer: Restoring landlords' right to exile peasants to Siberia.

Explanation: Alexander I initially cancelled the right to exile peasants to Siberia, but later *restored* this right as part of his reversals, meaning it was not a reform *introduced* to expand serf rights.

Return to Game

Why did Alexander I reverse some of his serfdom reforms in 1822-23?

Answer: Due to changes in the domestic political course.

Explanation: Alexander I reversed some of his reforms due to shifts in the domestic political course.

Return to Game

Which of the following was a measure taken by Nicholas I to mitigate serfdom without abolishing it?

Answer: He banned the sale of serfs at public auctions with family splitting.

Explanation: Nicholas I banned the sale of serfs at public auctions with family splitting as one of his measures to mitigate serfdom.

Return to Game

Socio-Economic Impact and Resistance

Serfdom was highly efficient for agriculture, leading to significant improvements in land yields due to serf labor.

Answer: False

Explanation: Serfdom was largely inefficient for agriculture, resulting in low and stagnant yields due to a lack of incentive for both serfs and nobles to improve the land.

Return to Game

Major rebellions like those of Stenka Razin and Yemelyan Pugachev were primarily directed at abolishing the institution of serfdom itself.

Answer: False

Explanation: These rebellions were not primarily aimed at abolishing serfdom as an institution; rather, peasants often joined as Cossacks to escape their serf status.

Return to Game

The newspaper *Kolokol* was instrumental in publicizing the abuses of serfdom within Russia, but its influence did not extend to Europe.

Answer: False

Explanation: *Kolokol* was published in London and Geneva and specifically drew international attention to the abuses of serfdom, indicating its influence extended to Europe.

Return to Game

The Russian state supported serfdom partly because conscripted serfs significantly increased the size of its military.

Answer: True

Explanation: Military conscription of serfs was a key reason the Russian state supported serfdom, as it provided a large military force.

Return to Game

By 1859, only a small fraction, about 20%, of all serfs were mortgaged to state credit institutions.

Answer: False

Explanation: By 1859, a significant majority, 66%, of all serfs were mortgaged to state credit institutions, not 20%.

Return to Game

Bourgeois individuals were never permitted to own serfs in Russia, as serf ownership was exclusively reserved for the nobility.

Answer: False

Explanation: Bourgeois individuals were permitted to own serfs during specific periods (1721–62 and 1798–1816) to encourage industrialization.

Return to Game

Russian literature and art often depicted serfdom, contributing to calls for social reform by highlighting the harsh realities of serf life.

Answer: True

Explanation: Prominent Russian authors and artists used serfdom as a backdrop, portraying its realities and contributing to calls for social reform.

Return to Game

How did serfdom generally impact agricultural efficiency in Russia?

Answer: It resulted in low and stagnant yields due to lack of incentive.

Explanation: Serfdom was largely inefficient, leading to low and stagnant agricultural yields because neither serfs nor nobles had sufficient incentive for improvement.

Return to Game

What was a key characteristic of major rebellions involving serfs, such as those led by Stenka Razin and Yemelyan Pugachev?

Answer: Peasants often joined as Cossacks to escape their peasant status.

Explanation: These rebellions saw peasants joining Cossack movements primarily to escape their serf status, rather than to abolish serfdom as an institution.

Return to Game

What was the primary role of the newspaper *Kolokol* regarding serfdom?

Answer: To collect and publicize cases of serf abuse, drawing international attention.

Explanation: *Kolokol* played a crucial role in exposing and publicizing the abuses of serfdom, garnering international attention.

Return to Game

What was the percentage of all serfs mortgaged to state credit institutions by 1859?

Answer: 66%

Explanation: By 1859, 66% of all serfs were mortgaged to state credit institutions.

Return to Game

During which periods were bourgeois individuals permitted to own serfs in Russia?

Answer: 1721–62 and 1798–1816

Explanation: Bourgeois individuals were permitted to own serfs during the periods of 1721–62 and 1798–1816.

Return to Game

Which prominent Russian authors used serfdom as a backdrop in their literature, portraying serf characters with emotional depth?

Answer: Leo Tolstoy and Fyodor Dostoevsky

Explanation: Leo Tolstoy and Fyodor Dostoevsky are noted for using serfdom as a backdrop in their literature, portraying serf characters with emotional depth.

Return to Game

The Emancipation of 1861 and its Aftermath

Serfdom in Russia was abolished by Emperor Nicholas I in 1861, making it one of the first European countries to do so.

Answer: False

Explanation: Serfdom was abolished by Emperor Alexander II in 1861, not Nicholas I. Furthermore, Russia's abolition occurred later than in many other European countries.

Return to Game

One of the primary reasons for the abolition of serfdom was the government's concern about a potential large-scale peasant revolt.

Answer: True

Explanation: Scholars identify the government's fear of a large-scale peasant revolt as a key reason for the abolition of serfdom.

Return to Game

After serfdom was abolished in Estland, Courland, and Livonia, all the land was immediately transferred to the peasants.

Answer: False

Explanation: After serfdom was abolished in these Baltic provinces, all the land remained in the hands of the nobility, and labor rent continued for decades.

Return to Game

The nobility was too weak to effectively oppose the emancipation of serfs due to widespread mortgaging of their serfs and estates.

Answer: True

Explanation: The extensive mortgaging of serfs and estates, along with other factors, significantly weakened the nobility's ability to oppose emancipation.

Return to Game

Grand Duchess Elena Pavlovna played a significant behind-the-scenes role in supporting Alexander II's emancipation reform.

Answer: True

Explanation: Grand Duchess Elena Pavlovna actively supported and guided Alexander II in his reform efforts, mobilizing advisors for the cause.

Return to Game

Serfdom was abolished in Kalmykia in 1861, at the same time as the main emancipation reform.

Answer: False

Explanation: Serfdom in Kalmykia was abolished much later, in 1892, not in 1861.

Return to Game

Following the 1861 emancipation, peasants often received highly fertile and contiguous plots of land at below-market prices.

Answer: False

Explanation: Peasants often received less fertile, non-contiguous plots at prices higher than market value, and had to pay a redemption fee.

Return to Game

A 2018 study found that the abolition of serfdom led to significant negative economic impacts, including decreased agricultural productivity.

Answer: False

Explanation: A 2018 study found that the abolition of serfdom led to 'substantial increases in agricultural productivity, industrial output, and peasants' nutrition,' indicating positive economic impacts.

Return to Game

After the 1861 emancipation, the household patriarch gained more power as he could rely on landowner intervention to enforce obedience.

Answer: False

Explanation: After emancipation, the household patriarch lost some traditional power because landowner intervention was no longer available to enforce obedience, and younger generations gained independence.

Return to Game

Which emperor was responsible for officially abolishing serfdom in Russia in 1861?

Answer: Alexander II

Explanation: Emperor Alexander II officially abolished serfdom in Russia through his emancipation reform of 1861.

Return to Game

Which of the following was NOT a key reason scholars proposed for the abolition of serfdom?

Answer: A sudden, widespread serf uprising demanding freedom

Explanation: While fear of revolt was a factor, a sudden, widespread uprising demanding freedom is not listed as a primary reason for abolition; rather, it was a concern that contributed to the government's decision.

Return to Game

What was the status of land ownership in Estland, Courland, and Livonia after serfdom was abolished there?

Answer: All the land remained in the hands of the nobility.

Explanation: After serfdom was abolished in these Baltic provinces, all land remained with the nobility, and peasants continued to pay labor rent.

Return to Game

What was a significant factor contributing to the nobility's inability to effectively oppose the emancipation of serfs?

Answer: The extensive mortgaging of their serfs and estates.

Explanation: The extensive mortgaging of serfs and estates was a major factor in the nobility's weakened position to oppose emancipation.

Return to Game

When was serfdom abolished in Kalmykia?

Answer: 1892

Explanation: Serfdom was abolished in Kalmykia in 1892.

Return to Game

According to a 2018 study, what was a positive economic impact of the abolition of serfdom?

Answer: Substantial increases in agricultural productivity

Explanation: A 2018 study found that the abolition of serfdom led to substantial increases in agricultural productivity, industrial output, and peasants' nutrition.

Return to Game

How did the emancipation of serfs in 1861 affect the power dynamics within peasant households?

Answer: Younger generations gained more independence by earning their own wages.

Explanation: The emancipation led to a decrease in the household patriarch's power and increased independence for younger generations who could earn their own wages.

Return to Game

Serf Obligations and Daily Life

'Barshchina' was a levy or payment made to the landowner, while 'obrok' was obligatory work on the landowner's land.

Answer: False

Explanation: The definitions are reversed: 'barshchina' was obligatory work, and 'obrok' was a levy or payment.

Return to Game

Paul I's 1797 ukase described a 'barshchina' of three days a week as a normal and sufficient amount of labor.

Answer: True

Explanation: Paul I's 1797 ukase indeed described three days a week of 'barshchina' as normal and sufficient.

Return to Game

The Russian Orthodox Church's rules allowed serf marriages to occur at any time of the year, including during fasting periods.

Answer: False

Explanation: The Russian Orthodox Church had strict rules prohibiting marriage during fasting periods, on the eve or day of holidays, and at other specific times, concentrating marriages into certain months.

Return to Game

After 1830, the minimum marriage age for serf women was 16 and for men was 18.

Answer: True

Explanation: The minimum marriage ages for serfs were raised to 16 for women and 18 for men after 1830.

Return to Game

In the Central Black Earth Region, the majority of serfs performed 'obrok' (payments) rather than 'barshchina' (labor services).

Answer: False

Explanation: In the Central Black Earth Region, 70-77% of serfs performed 'barshchina' (labor services), meaning the majority performed labor, not payments.

Return to Game

What were the two main types of labor and obligations performed by serfs?

Answer: Barshchina and Obrok

Explanation: The two main types of labor and obligations performed by serfs were 'barshchina' (labor) and 'obrok' (payments).

Return to Game

What was the typical extent of 'barshchina' described by Paul I's 1797 ukase?

Answer: Three days a week

Explanation: Paul I's 1797 ukase described a 'barshchina' of three days a week as normal and sufficient.

Return to Game

Which months were most marriages concentrated in due to Russian Orthodox Church rules before 1861?

Answer: January, February, October, November

Explanation: Due to Orthodox Church rules prohibiting marriage during fasting and holidays, most marriages were concentrated in January, February, October, and November.

Return to Game

What was the minimum marriage age for serf women after 1830?

Answer: 16 years old

Explanation: After 1830, the minimum marriage age for serf women was raised to 16 years old.

Return to Game

In the Central Black Earth Region, what percentage of serfs performed 'barshchina' (labor services)?

Answer: 70-77%

Explanation: In the Central Black Earth Region, 70-77% of serfs performed 'barshchina' (labor services).

Return to Game