Enter a player name to begin or load your saved progress.
In the UK, shared appreciation mortgages were structured as a form of equity release, allowing homeowners to sell a portion of their property to the lender while retaining the right to live there.
Answer: False
Explanation: In the UK, shared appreciation mortgages allowed borrowers to retain full ownership of the property, unlike Home Reversion plans where a portion is sold. The lender provided a capital sum in exchange for a share of future appreciation.
Bank of Scotland sold approximately 12,000 shared appreciation mortgages between November 1996 and March 1998, primarily through financial advisers.
Answer: True
Explanation: Bank of Scotland was a prominent seller, distributing approximately 12,000 shared appreciation mortgages through financial advisers during this period.
Barclays Bank marketed its shared appreciation mortgages directly to borrowers, selling 3,253 SAMs between May and July 1998.
Answer: True
Explanation: Barclays Bank indeed marketed its shared appreciation mortgages directly to borrowers and sold 3,253 SAMs within the specified timeframe.
The average loan size for Barclays Bank's shared appreciation mortgages was approximately £30,126.
Answer: True
Explanation: Barclays Bank loaned a total of £98 million across 3,253 SAMs, resulting in an average loan size of approximately £30,126.
For zero-interest shared appreciation mortgages in the UK, the lender typically lent a sum up to a maximum of 50% of the property's initial value.
Answer: False
Explanation: For zero-interest shared appreciation mortgages in the UK, the lender typically lent a sum up to a maximum of 25% of the property's initial value, not 50%.
Bank of Scotland's interest-bearing shared appreciation mortgages allowed borrowers to take out a maximum loan of 75% of the property's value.
Answer: True
Explanation: Bank of Scotland's interest-bearing shared appreciation mortgages indeed allowed borrowers to take out a maximum loan of 75% of the property's value, in contrast to the 25% limit for zero-interest SAMs.
Securitization was initially a core component of the first version of shared appreciation mortgages due to its positive reputation in the market.
Answer: False
Explanation: Securitization was initially excluded from the first version of shared appreciation mortgages due to its negative reputation and significant taxation risks for the bank, not its positive reputation.
Bank of Scotland offered two main interest rate choices for SAMs: 0% interest for up to 25% LTV, and 5.75% interest for up to 75% LTV.
Answer: True
Explanation: Bank of Scotland indeed offered these two distinct interest rate and loan-to-value options for its shared appreciation mortgages.
The 0% SAMs offered by Bank of Scotland were securitized into fixed rate bonds for investors.
Answer: False
Explanation: The 0% SAMs offered by Bank of Scotland were securitized into *floating rate bonds* linked to the three-month Libor, while the 5.75% SAMs were securitized into fixed rate bonds.
Shared appreciation mortgages were expected to appeal to investors because their earnings were linked to house prices, which historically performed better than shares.
Answer: False
Explanation: Shared appreciation mortgages were expected to appeal to investors because their earnings were linked to house prices, which historically performed better than inflation *but not as well as shares*.
Bank of Scotland managed SAM funds by establishing a single, large independent company to oversee all SAM operations.
Answer: False
Explanation: Bank of Scotland managed SAM funds by establishing an *independent company for each SAM*, not a single large one, to keep them separate from its other operations.
Bank of Scotland's first shared appreciation mortgages (BoS SAM 1 and BoS SAM 2) were launched in March 1998.
Answer: False
Explanation: Bank of Scotland's first shared appreciation mortgages (BoS SAM 1 and BoS SAM 2) were launched on November 11, 1996, not March 1998.
Pension funds were the primary investors in the initial Bank of Scotland SAMs, as anticipated.
Answer: False
Explanation: Unexpectedly, pension funds did not invest in the initial Bank of Scotland SAMs, contrary to expectations.
Barclays Bank launched its shared appreciation mortgage product in March 1998, after Bank of Scotland had already withdrawn theirs.
Answer: True
Explanation: Barclays Bank launched its SAM product in March 1998, which was indeed after Bank of Scotland had withdrawn its own SAMs.
Shared appreciation mortgages returned to the market in 2000 after a temporary withdrawal in 1998.
Answer: False
Explanation: Shared appreciation mortgages did not subsequently return to the market after their temporary withdrawal in July 1998.
The Bank of Scotland shared appreciation mortgage was recognized by the Design Council as a 'Millennium Product' for its innovation.
Answer: True
Explanation: The Bank of Scotland shared appreciation mortgage was indeed selected as one of 1,012 'Millennium Products' by the Design Council for its innovation.
By the time the final list of Millennium Products was announced in December 1999, shared appreciation mortgages were still being actively offered for sale by both Bank of Scotland and Barclays Bank.
Answer: False
Explanation: By December 1999, shared appreciation mortgages were no longer being offered for sale by either Bank of Scotland or Barclays Bank, despite one of their products receiving Millennium Product recognition.
In the 20 years preceding Bank of Scotland's SAM sales, the UK House Price Index increased by an average annual inflation of 9.0%.
Answer: True
Explanation: The UK House Price Index indeed increased by an average annual inflation of 9.0% in the 20 years preceding Bank of Scotland's SAM sales in November 1996.
Under Home Reversion plans, the borrower retains full ownership of the property, similar to a Shared Appreciation Mortgage.
Answer: False
Explanation: Under Home Reversion plans, a portion of the house is sold to the lender, transferring partial property ownership. In contrast, with Shared Appreciation Mortgages, full ownership is retained by the borrower.
How were shared appreciation mortgages primarily structured in the UK as a form of equity release?
Answer: Lenders provided a capital sum, and borrowers agreed to share future property value increases while retaining ownership.
Explanation: In the UK, SAMs as equity release involved lenders providing a capital sum, with borrowers retaining full ownership but agreeing to share future property appreciation.
Which bank was prominent in selling approximately 12,000 shared appreciation mortgages between November 1996 and March 1998?
Answer: Bank of Scotland
Explanation: Bank of Scotland was prominent in selling approximately 12,000 shared appreciation mortgages during this period, primarily through financial advisers.
What was the approximate average loan size for Barclays Bank's shared appreciation mortgages, given they loaned £98 million across 3,253 SAMs?
Answer: £30,126
Explanation: Dividing the total loaned amount (£98 million) by the number of SAMs sold (3,253) yields an average loan size of approximately £30,126.
For a typical zero-interest shared appreciation mortgage in the UK, what was the maximum percentage of the property's initial value that could be borrowed?
Answer: 25%
Explanation: For zero-interest shared appreciation mortgages in the UK, borrowers could typically borrow up to a maximum of 25% of the property's initial value.
For shared appreciation mortgage repayment calculations, who commissioned the final property valuation and who paid for it?
Answer: The lender commissioned it, and the borrower paid for it.
Explanation: The final property valuation for SAM repayment was commissioned by the lender but the cost was borne by the borrower.
What was the maximum loan amount for Bank of Scotland's interest-bearing shared appreciation mortgages?
Answer: 75% of the property's value
Explanation: Bank of Scotland's interest-bearing shared appreciation mortgages allowed for a maximum loan amount of 75% of the property's value.
What was a primary reason for securitization being initially excluded from the first version of the shared appreciation mortgage product?
Answer: It had a negative reputation and posed significant taxation risks for the bank.
Explanation: Securitization was initially excluded due to its negative reputation and the significant taxation risks associated with proposed interest rate swaps for the bank.
Which two main interest rate choices were offered to borrowers for shared appreciation mortgages by Bank of Scotland?
Answer: 0% and 5.75% interest mortgages
Explanation: Bank of Scotland offered two main interest rate choices: a 0% interest mortgage for up to 25% LTV, and a 5.75% interest mortgage for up to 75% LTV.
How were the 0% SAMs offered by Bank of Scotland securitized for investors?
Answer: Into floating rate bonds linked to the three-month Libor.
Explanation: The 0% SAMs were securitized into floating rate bonds, with a variable interest rate linked to the three-month Libor.
When were Bank of Scotland's first shared appreciation mortgages (BoS SAM 1 and BoS SAM 2) launched?
Answer: November 1996
Explanation: Bank of Scotland's first shared appreciation mortgages (BoS SAM 1 and BoS SAM 2) were launched on November 11, 1996.
What was an unexpected finding regarding the typical age of borrowers for the initial Bank of Scotland SAMs?
Answer: The majority of borrowers were in their fifties or sixties, not seventies.
Explanation: While borrowers were anticipated to be in their seventies, most of them turned out to be in their fifties or sixties, indicating a broader appeal than initially projected.
In what month and year did Barclays Bank launch its shared appreciation mortgage product?
Answer: March 1998
Explanation: Barclays Bank launched its shared appreciation mortgage product in March 1998.
What was the ultimate fate of shared appreciation mortgages in the market after their temporary withdrawal in July 1998?
Answer: They did not subsequently return to the market.
Explanation: Shared appreciation mortgages did not return to the market after their temporary withdrawal in July 1998.
What recognition did the Bank of Scotland shared appreciation mortgage receive from the Design Council?
Answer: It was selected as one of 1,012 'Millennium Products'.
Explanation: The Bank of Scotland shared appreciation mortgage was recognized as one of 1,012 'Millennium Products' by the Design Council for its innovation.
By December 1999, when the final list of Millennium Products was announced, what was the status of shared appreciation mortgages?
Answer: They were no longer being offered for sale by either Bank of Scotland or Barclays Bank.
Explanation: By December 1999, shared appreciation mortgages were no longer actively offered for sale by either Bank of Scotland or Barclays Bank.
What was the average annual inflation of the UK House Price Index in the 20 years preceding Bank of Scotland's SAM sales in November 1996?
Answer: 9.0%
Explanation: In the 20 years preceding Bank of Scotland's SAM sales, the UK House Price Index increased by an average annual inflation of 9.0%.
What was the key distinction between Home Reversion plans and Shared Appreciation Mortgages in terms of property ownership?
Answer: Home Reversion involves selling a portion of the house, while SAMs retain full ownership by the borrower.
Explanation: The key distinction is that Home Reversion plans involve selling a portion of the property, transferring ownership, whereas Shared Appreciation Mortgages allow the borrower to retain full ownership.
What was the total repayment amount, including fees, for the example £30,000 loan on a £120,000 house in the BoS SAM No. 4 PLC sales booklet, assuming 4.5% average house price inflation over 20 years?
Answer: £158,944
Explanation: According to the BoS SAM No. 4 PLC sales booklet example, the total repayment, including the initial loan, shared appreciation, and various fees, amounted to £158,944 under the specified conditions.
What was the primary reason for the withdrawal of shared appreciation mortgages from the market in July 1998?
Answer: Demand from borrowers exceeded the supply of money from the bonds market.
Explanation: Shared appreciation mortgages were withdrawn from the market in July 1998 because the demand from borrowers surpassed the available supply of money from the bonds market.
Shared appreciation mortgages sold in the UK between 1996 and 1998 consistently proved beneficial for the borrowers.
Answer: False
Explanation: Shared appreciation mortgages sold in the UK between 1996 and 1998 did not consistently prove beneficial for borrowers, with many facing unfavorable outcomes due to the terms and subsequent market conditions.
A significant negative consequence for SAM borrowers was having more money available to downsize to a smaller property due to the appreciation share.
Answer: False
Explanation: A significant negative consequence for SAM borrowers was often having *insufficient* funds to downsize or cover care home fees, as the appreciation share left them with only a small proportion of their property's value.
In the 1990s, shared appreciation mortgages were fully regulated under the Financial Services Authority (FSA).
Answer: False
Explanation: In the 1990s, shared appreciation mortgages were not fully regulated under the Financial Services Authority (FSA), as the FSA did not begin regulating mortgage business until October 31, 2004.
The Consumer Credit Act 2006 allowed borrowers to challenge unfair debtor-creditor relationships in court, with retrospective changes.
Answer: True
Explanation: The Consumer Credit Act 2006, with its retrospective changes, indeed empowered borrowers to challenge unfair debtor-creditor relationships in court.
The Unfair Terms in Consumer Contracts Regulations 1999 mandated that contract terms must be expressed in complex legal jargon to ensure clarity for all parties.
Answer: False
Explanation: The Unfair Terms in Consumer Contracts Regulations 1999 mandated that contract terms must be expressed in *plain, intelligible language*, not complex legal jargon, to ensure clarity for consumers.
The Treasury's 2002 Green Paper proposed deregulating equity release plans to stimulate market growth.
Answer: False
Explanation: The Treasury's 2002 Green Paper proposed exploring options to create a level playing field for the *regulation* of equity release and home reversion plans, with the goal of protecting consumers and improving market functioning, not deregulating them.
Paul Boateng announced in July 2003 that all mortgage-based equity release schemes would be regulated by the FSA starting October 31, 2004.
Answer: True
Explanation: Paul Boateng's announcement in July 2003 confirmed that all mortgage-based equity release schemes would fall under FSA regulation from October 31, 2004, to enhance consumer protection.
What was the general outcome for borrowers who took out shared appreciation mortgages in the UK between 1996 and 1998?
Answer: They generally faced unfavorable outcomes due to the terms and market conditions.
Explanation: Shared appreciation mortgages sold in the UK between 1996 and 1998 did not consistently prove beneficial, with many borrowers facing unfavorable outcomes due to the terms and significant house price increases.
Which of the following represents a significant negative consequence for borrowers with shared appreciation mortgages?
Answer: Insufficient funds to downsize or cover care home fees.
Explanation: The substantial repayment amounts and small remaining equity often left borrowers with insufficient funds for downsizing, care home fees, or leaving an inheritance.
How did the regulatory environment in the 1990s affect shared appreciation mortgages in the UK?
Answer: Mortgages were not fully regulated, and separate SAM companies were not signatories to voluntary codes, limiting consumer complaint avenues.
Explanation: In the 1990s, mortgages were not fully regulated, and the separate companies administering SAMs were not signatories to voluntary codes, which limited consumer complaint avenues through the Financial Ombudsman Service.
When did the Financial Services Authority (FSA) begin to regulate mortgage business in the UK?
Answer: October 31, 2004
Explanation: The Financial Services Authority (FSA) began regulating mortgage business in the UK on October 31, 2004.
What was a key impact of the Consumer Credit Act 2006 on shared appreciation mortgage borrowers?
Answer: It allowed borrowers to challenge unfair debtor-creditor relationships in court, with retrospective changes.
Explanation: The Consumer Credit Act 2006, with its retrospective changes, enabled borrowers to challenge unfair debtor-creditor relationships in court, potentially varying loan agreement terms.
According to the Unfair Terms in Consumer Contracts Regulations 1999, what was required regarding the language of contract terms?
Answer: Terms had to be expressed in plain, intelligible language.
Explanation: Regulation 7 of the Unfair Terms in Consumer Contracts Regulations 1999 mandated that written contract terms must be expressed in plain, intelligible language.
Harold Fisher's complaint about his Bank of Scotland SAM was successfully resolved in his favor by the Financial Ombudsman Service.
Answer: False
Explanation: The Financial Ombudsman Service ruled against Harold Fisher, stating they typically sided with banks in such disputes, meaning his complaint was not resolved in his favor.
The Shared Appreciation Mortgage Victims Action Group (SAMVIC) was formed in 2003 to coordinate legal action against banks.
Answer: True
Explanation: SAMVIC was indeed formed in 2003 by homeowners who felt deceived, with the purpose of coordinating legal action against the banks.
Barclays Bank launched a formal Shared Appreciation Mortgage Hardship Scheme in 2007 to assist customers facing difficulties.
Answer: True
Explanation: Barclays Bank indeed launched a formal SAM Hardship Scheme in June 2007 to provide assistance to customers experiencing substantial hardship due to changed circumstances.
The Shared Appreciation Mortgage Action Group (SAMAG) successfully won its class action against the banks, leading to altered mortgage terms for its members.
Answer: False
Explanation: SAMAG's class action was unsuccessful; the banks won their appeal, leading to the withdrawal of the customers' case and no alteration of mortgage terms through this action.
Teacher Stern LLP achieved confidential settlements with both Barclays Bank and Bank of Scotland for SAM claimants in 2021 and 2024, respectively.
Answer: True
Explanation: Teacher Stern LLP successfully negotiated confidential settlements with Barclays Bank in 2021 and Bank of Scotland in 2024 for SAM claimants.
Group claims for Scottish shared appreciation mortgages are straightforward to pursue under English law due to legal similarities.
Answer: False
Explanation: Group claims for Scottish shared appreciation mortgages are challenging because some agreements are governed by Scots law, which differs from English law, and English solicitors are currently not prepared to make such claims.
What was the outcome of Harold Fisher's complaint to the Financial Ombudsman Service regarding his Bank of Scotland SAM?
Answer: The FOS ruled against him, stating they typically sided with banks in such disputes.
Explanation: The Financial Ombudsman Service ruled against Harold Fisher, indicating a general tendency to side with banks in such disputes.
What was the primary purpose of the Shared Appreciation Mortgage Victims Action Group (SAMVIC), formed in 2003?
Answer: To coordinate legal action against the banks on behalf of homeowners.
Explanation: SAMVIC was formed to coordinate legal action against banks on behalf of homeowners who felt deceived by shared appreciation mortgages.
What was the nature of the Barclays Shared Appreciation Mortgage (SAM) Hardship Scheme launched in 2007?
Answer: It provided an interest-free loan to help customers move or adapt their homes, repayable upon the new home's sale.
Explanation: The Barclays SAM Hardship Scheme offered an interest-free loan to assist customers in moving or adapting their homes due to hardship, with repayment due upon the sale of the new home.
What was the outcome of SAMAG's class action against the banks?
Answer: The banks won their appeal, leading to the withdrawal of the customers' case.
Explanation: The banks won their appeal against SAMAG's class action, which ultimately led to the withdrawal of the customers' case due to insufficient funds for further legal action.
Which law firm successfully negotiated confidential settlements with Barclays Bank and Bank of Scotland for SAM claimants in 2021 and 2024?
Answer: Teacher Stern LLP
Explanation: Teacher Stern LLP successfully negotiated confidential settlements with Barclays Bank in 2021 and Bank of Scotland in 2024 for SAM claimants.
Why are group claims for Scottish shared appreciation mortgages currently challenging?
Answer: Some agreements are governed by Scots law, which differs from English law, and English solicitors are not prepared to make such claims.
Explanation: Group claims for Scottish SAMs are challenging because they are governed by Scots law, which differs from English law, and English solicitors are currently unwilling to pursue such claims.
In the US commercial mortgage context, the contingent interest in a SAM is determined and due upon the sale of the property or termination of the mortgage.
Answer: True
Explanation: In the US commercial mortgage context, the contingent interest, representing the lender's share of appreciated value, is indeed determined and due upon the sale of the property or termination of the mortgage.
The IRS Revenue Ruling 83-51 states that contingent interest in a SAM is never considered tax-deductible mortgage interest.
Answer: False
Explanation: IRS Revenue Ruling 83-51 specifies conditions under which contingent interest in a SAM *may be considered* tax-deductible mortgage interest, particularly if the SAM stipulates an unconditional obligation for principal payment.
In US affordable housing programs, shared appreciation clauses are structured as 'silent' first mortgages, requiring immediate payments.
Answer: False
Explanation: In US affordable housing programs, shared appreciation clauses are typically structured as 'silent' *second* mortgages, where borrowers make no payments until the home is sold or the first mortgage is refinanced.
The City of Seattle's down payment assistance program imposes a maximum effective interest rate of 10% on shared appreciation loans.
Answer: False
Explanation: The City of Seattle's down payment assistance program imposes a maximum effective interest rate of *6%* on shared appreciation loans, as a usury limitation.
In the US commercial mortgage context, what is the share of appreciated value received by the lender known as?
Answer: Contingent interest
Explanation: In the US commercial mortgage context, the lender's share of appreciated value is known as 'contingent interest'.
According to IRS Revenue Ruling 83-51, under what condition may contingent interest in a US shared appreciation mortgage be considered tax-deductible mortgage interest?
Answer: If the SAM stipulates an unconditional obligation for principal payment.
Explanation: IRS Revenue Ruling 83-51 states that contingent interest in a SAM may be considered tax-deductible mortgage interest if the SAM stipulates an unconditional obligation for principal payment.
How are shared appreciation clauses typically structured in US affordable housing programs?
Answer: As 'silent' second mortgages where borrowers make no payments until sale or refinance.
Explanation: In US affordable housing programs, shared appreciation clauses are typically structured as 'silent' second mortgages, requiring no payments until the home is sold or refinanced.
If a $50,000 subsidy was provided for a $250,000 home in an affordable housing SAM program, what percentage of home price appreciation would the family typically return upon sale?
Answer: 20%
Explanation: The share of appreciation is typically based on the proportion of the original purchase price that was subsidized. A $50,000 subsidy on a $250,000 home represents 20% of the value, so 20% of the appreciation would be returned.
What limitation can be placed on shared appreciation in affordable housing programs, as exemplified by the City of Seattle?
Answer: A usury limitation, such as a maximum effective interest rate of 6%.
Explanation: The City of Seattle's program exemplifies a usury limitation, imposing a maximum effective interest rate of 6% on shared appreciation loans.