Enter a player name to begin or load your saved progress.
The Siege of Valencia (1092-1094) resulted in a Christian victory for the forces of the Kingdom of Castile.
Answer: True
Explanation: The Siege of Valencia (1092-1094) concluded with a Christian victory for the Kingdom of Castile, leading to the establishment of the Lordship of Valencia.
Rodrigo Díaz de Vivar, known as El Cid, commanded the forces for the Kingdom of Castile during the Siege of Valencia.
Answer: True
Explanation: Rodrigo Díaz de Vivar, famously known as El Cid, was the Castilian nobleman and military leader who commanded the forces of the Kingdom of Castile during the Siege of Valencia.
The Siege of Valencia was a significant part of the broader historical period known as the Reconquista.
Answer: True
Explanation: The Siege of Valencia (1092-1094) is recognized as a significant event within the Reconquista, the centuries-long effort by Christian kingdoms to reclaim territory from Muslim rule in the Iberian Peninsula.
Valencia fell to El Cid in 1094 after a siege that lasted approximately two years.
Answer: True
Explanation: Valencia capitulated to El Cid in May 1094, concluding a siege that spanned two years, from 1092 to 1094.
El Cid's siege of Valencia was prolonged for nineteen months.
Answer: True
Explanation: El Cid's siege of Valencia indeed lasted for nineteen months, from 1092 until the city's fall in May 1094.
The Siege of Valencia (1092-1094) was primarily a naval conflict for control of the Mediterranean trade routes.
Answer: False
Explanation: The Siege of Valencia (1092-1094) was a military conflict focused on the conquest of the Muslim kingdom of Valencia by land forces, not primarily a naval conflict.
The Taifa of Valencia received support from the Almoravid dynasty during the siege.
Answer: True
Explanation: The Taifa of Valencia did receive support from the Almoravid dynasty, a powerful Muslim empire, during the siege against El Cid.
The statue of El Cid referenced in the source material is located in Valencia, Spain.
Answer: False
Explanation: The statue of El Cid referenced in the source material is located in San Diego, California, not Valencia, Spain.
The Siege of Valencia took place on the western coast of the Iberian Peninsula.
Answer: False
Explanation: The Siege of Valencia occurred on the eastern coast of the Iberian Peninsula, where the city of Valencia is located.
What was the primary objective of the Siege of Valencia (1092-1094)?
Answer: To conquer the Muslim kingdom of Valencia for the Kingdom of Castile.
Explanation: The primary objective of the Siege of Valencia was the conquest of the Muslim kingdom of Valencia by the forces of the Kingdom of Castile, led by El Cid.
Who led the forces of the Kingdom of Castile during the Siege of Valencia (1092-1094)?
Answer: Rodrigo Díaz de Vivar
Explanation: Rodrigo Díaz de Vivar, known as El Cid, was the Castilian military leader who commanded the forces of the Kingdom of Castile during the Siege of Valencia.
What was the ultimate outcome of the Siege of Valencia (1092-1094)?
Answer: A Christian victory, leading to the Lordship of Valencia.
Explanation: The Siege of Valencia concluded with a Christian victory for the Kingdom of Castile, resulting in the establishment of the Lordship of Valencia.
Which broader historical period was the Siege of Valencia a part of?
Answer: The Reconquista
Explanation: The Siege of Valencia was an integral event within the Reconquista, the historical period of Christian reconquest of the Iberian Peninsula from Muslim rule.
How long did El Cid's siege of Valencia last before the city finally fell?
Answer: Nineteen months
Explanation: El Cid's siege of Valencia lasted for nineteen months, from 1092 until the city's fall in May 1094.
The Siege of Valencia (1092-1094) involved the Kingdom of Castile against which Muslim entity?
Answer: The Taifa of Valencia
Explanation: The Siege of Valencia pitted the Kingdom of Castile, led by El Cid, against the Taifa of Valencia, which received support from the Almoravid dynasty.
Where is the statue of El Cid referenced in the source material located?
Answer: San Diego, California
Explanation: The statue of El Cid mentioned in the source material is situated in San Diego, California.
The Siege of Valencia was located on which coast of the Iberian Peninsula?
Answer: Eastern coast
Explanation: Valencia is situated on the eastern coast of the Iberian Peninsula, which was the location of the siege.
Yahya al-Qadir was the ruler of Valencia who successfully negotiated a peace treaty with El Cid in October 1092.
Answer: False
Explanation: Yahya al-Qadir was the ruler whom the Valencians sought to depose in October 1092, and he was subsequently apprehended and sentenced to death, not a negotiator of a peace treaty.
Ibn Jahhaf proclaimed himself governor of Valencia on October 29, 1092, after the deposition of Yahya al-Qadir.
Answer: True
Explanation: Ibn Jahhaf indeed proclaimed himself governor of Valencia on October 29, 1092, following the deposition and execution of the previous ruler, Yahya al-Qadir.
El Cid initially agreed to make Ibn Jahhaf ruler of Valencia on the condition that he would not surrender the city to the Almoravids.
Answer: True
Explanation: El Cid's initial agreement with Ibn Jahhaf stipulated that Ibn Jahhaf would rule Valencia and pay tribute, provided he did not surrender the city to the Almoravids.
Ibn Jahhaf remained loyal to El Cid throughout the siege, never seeking external assistance.
Answer: False
Explanation: Ibn Jahhaf did not remain loyal; he secretly sent messages to Yusuf ibn Tashfin, the Almoravid leader, requesting intervention against El Cid.
During El Cid's siege, the citizens of Valencia were internally divided, with some supporting defense and others negotiating with El Cid.
Answer: True
Explanation: The citizens of Valencia were indeed internally divided during the siege, with factions supporting defense against El Cid and others, including Ibn Jahhaf, engaging in negotiations.
The initial unrest in Valencia in October 1092 was triggered by El Cid's direct attack on the city.
Answer: False
Explanation: The initial unrest in Valencia in October 1092 was triggered by the Valencians' desire to depose their ruler, Yahya al-Qadir, and their appeal to Muhammad ibn Aisa, not by a direct attack from El Cid.
Yahya al-Qadir was able to successfully flee Valencia disguised as a woman and escape execution.
Answer: False
Explanation: Yahya al-Qadir attempted to flee Valencia disguised as a woman but was apprehended and subsequently sentenced to death, not escaping execution.
Ibn Jahhaf's secret agreement with El Cid during the siege was fully finalized, leading to a swift end to the conflict.
Answer: False
Explanation: Ibn Jahhaf's secret negotiations with El Cid were not finalized, which contributed to the prolongation of the siege for many months.
The initial agreement between El Cid and Ibn Jahhaf required Ibn Jahhaf to surrender Valencia to the Almoravids immediately.
Answer: False
Explanation: The initial agreement between El Cid and Ibn Jahhaf explicitly stipulated that Ibn Jahhaf would *not* surrender the city to the Almoravids.
Who was the ruler of Valencia whom the Valencians sought to depose in October 1092?
Answer: Yahya al-Qadir
Explanation: Yahya al-Qadir was the ruler of Valencia whom the Valencians sought to depose in October 1092, leading to an uprising.
How did Ibn Jahhaf come to power in Valencia in October 1092?
Answer: He proclaimed himself governor after the deposition and execution of Yahya al-Qadir.
Explanation: Ibn Jahhaf proclaimed himself governor of Valencia on October 29, 1092, following the successful deposition and execution of Yahya al-Qadir by the Valencians.
What was a key condition El Cid imposed on Ibn Jahhaf when making him ruler of Valencia initially?
Answer: Ibn Jahhaf had to pay tribute and not surrender the city to the Almoravids.
Explanation: El Cid's initial agreement with Ibn Jahhaf stipulated that he would pay tribute and, crucially, not surrender Valencia to the Almoravids.
How did Ibn Jahhaf betray his agreement with El Cid?
Answer: He secretly requested intervention from the Almoravid leader, Yusuf ibn Tashfin.
Explanation: Ibn Jahhaf betrayed El Cid by secretly sending messages to Yusuf ibn Tashfin, the Almoravid leader, requesting his intervention to expel El Cid from the region.
What was the internal state of the citizens of Valencia during El Cid's nineteen-month siege?
Answer: They were internally divided, with some supporting defense and others negotiating with El Cid.
Explanation: During El Cid's prolonged siege, the citizens of Valencia were internally divided, with factions supporting defense and others, including Ibn Jahhaf, engaging in negotiations with El Cid.
What was Yahya al-Qadir's fate during the Valencian uprising in October 1092?
Answer: He was deposed and subsequently sentenced to death.
Explanation: During the Valencian uprising in October 1092, Yahya al-Qadir was deposed and, after attempting to flee, was sentenced to death.
What was the nature of the secret agreement between Ibn Jahhaf and El Cid during the prolonged siege?
Answer: The negotiations were not finalized, prolonging the siege.
Explanation: The secret negotiations between Ibn Jahhaf and El Cid during the siege were not finalized, which contributed to the siege's extended duration.
What was the primary reason for the Valencians' initial unrest in October 1092 while El Cid was away?
Answer: A desire to depose their ruler, Yahya al-Qadir.
Explanation: The primary reason for the Valencians' initial unrest in October 1092 was their collective decision to depose their ruler, Yahya al-Qadir.
The first Almoravid army sent to assist Valencia under Abu Bakr ibn Ibrahim ibn Tashfin successfully engaged El Cid's forces.
Answer: False
Explanation: The first Almoravid army, led by Abu Bakr ibn Ibrahim ibn Tashfin, retreated without engaging El Cid's forces, thus failing to assist Valencia.
Yusuf ibn Tashfin, the Almoravid leader, ordered the recapture of Valencia after El Cid's initial victory.
Answer: True
Explanation: Yusuf ibn Tashfin, the leader of the Almoravid dynasty, did indeed order the recapture of Valencia following El Cid's successful conquest.
The Almoravid army for the recapture of Valencia was composed solely of troops from Ceuta.
Answer: False
Explanation: The Almoravid army for the recapture of Valencia was assembled from troops in Ceuta, reinforced by garrisons in Andalusia, and augmented by contingents from various Taifas, not solely from Ceuta.
The Almoravid army for the recapture of Valencia was led by Yusuf ibn Tashfin himself.
Answer: False
Explanation: Yusuf ibn Tashfin ordered the recapture but appointed his nephew, Abu 'Abdullah Muhammad, to lead the Almoravid expedition, not himself.
The Zirid Taifa of Granada contributed troops to the Almoravid army attempting to recapture Valencia.
Answer: True
Explanation: The Almoravid army for the recapture of Valencia was indeed joined by part of the garrison and army of the extinct Zirid Taifa of Granada, among other Taifas.
What was the outcome of the first Almoravid army's attempt to assist Valencia under Abu Bakr ibn Ibrahim ibn Tashfin?
Answer: They retreated without engaging in a fight, abandoning Valencia.
Explanation: The first Almoravid army, led by Abu Bakr ibn Ibrahim ibn Tashfin, retreated without engaging El Cid's forces, effectively abandoning Valencia to its fate.
Who ordered the recapture of Valencia after El Cid's initial victory in 1094?
Answer: Yusuf ibn Tashfin
Explanation: Yusuf ibn Tashfin, the leader of the Almoravid dynasty, issued the order for the recapture of Valencia following El Cid's initial conquest in 1094.
Why was Abu 'Abdullah Muhammad chosen to lead the Almoravid expedition to recapture Valencia instead of Muhammad ibn Aisa?
Answer: Muhammad ibn Aisa lacked a permanent army.
Explanation: Abu 'Abdullah Muhammad was chosen to lead the Almoravid expedition because Muhammad ibn Aisa, another potential leader, did not possess a permanent army.
Which of the following Taifas contributed troops to the Almoravid army for the recapture of Valencia?
Answer: Granada, Lérida, and Tortosa
Explanation: The Almoravid army for the recapture of Valencia was reinforced by troops from the Zirid Taifa of Granada, as well as from Lérida, Tortosa, Alpuente, and Albarracín.
The Almoravid army for the recapture of Valencia was assembled by mobilizing troops in which key location before crossing the Strait of Gibraltar?
Answer: Ceuta
Explanation: The Almoravid army for the recapture of Valencia was primarily assembled by mobilizing troops in Ceuta before they crossed the Strait of Gibraltar.
Which leader of the Almoravid dynasty ordered the recapture of Valencia after El Cid's initial victory?
Answer: Yusuf ibn Tashfin
Explanation: Yusuf ibn Tashfin, the supreme leader of the Almoravid dynasty, commanded the recapture of Valencia following El Cid's initial victory.
The Almoravid army for the recapture of Valencia gathered additional contingents from garrisons in which region?
Answer: Andalusia
Explanation: The Almoravid army for the recapture of Valencia was reinforced by troops from garrisons in Andalusia after crossing the Strait of Gibraltar.
Before attempting to recapture Valencia, the Muslim forces camped in Quart de Poblet.
Answer: True
Explanation: The Muslim forces, prior to their attempt to recapture Valencia, established their encampment in Quart de Poblet, a few kilometers from the city.
The morale of the Almoravid besiegers remained high throughout their attempt to recapture Valencia, despite El Cid's presence.
Answer: False
Explanation: The morale of the Almoravid besiegers declined significantly when news of El Cid's appeal to Alfonso VI for help spread, leading to desertions.
El Cid launched his decisive attack on the Almoravid forces without waiting for promised help from Alfonso VI of León.
Answer: True
Explanation: El Cid strategically decided to attack the Almoravid forces, exploiting their low morale, without waiting for the reinforcements promised by Alfonso VI of León.
El Cid's decisive attack on October 25, 1094, involved a direct frontal assault on the well-prepared Almoravid camp.
Answer: False
Explanation: El Cid's decisive attack on October 25, 1094, was a strategic maneuver involving a feigned retreat and an ambush, not a direct frontal assault on a well-prepared camp.
The victory on October 25, 1094, solidified El Cid's control over the Lordship of Valencia and hindered Almoravid expansion.
Answer: True
Explanation: El Cid's victory on October 25, 1094, indeed led to the firm establishment of the Lordship of Valencia under his control and effectively delayed the Almoravid dynasty's expansion in the region.
The Muslim citizens of Valencia had high morale upon seeing the Almoravid army, believing their liberation was imminent.
Answer: True
Explanation: Upon the arrival of the Almoravid army, the Muslim citizens of Valencia indeed experienced high morale, anticipating their imminent liberation from El Cid's rule.
El Cid's final victory in 1094 involved a direct, prolonged battle of attrition against the Almoravid forces.
Answer: False
Explanation: El Cid's decisive victory on October 25, 1094, was achieved through a strategic ambush following a feigned retreat, not a prolonged battle of attrition.
Where did the Muslim forces camp before their attempt to recapture Valencia?
Answer: In Quart de Poblet, a few kilometers from Valencia
Explanation: The Muslim forces established their camp in Quart de Poblet, located a few kilometers from Valencia, before commencing their recapture attempt.
What caused the morale of the Almoravid besiegers to decline during their attempt to recapture Valencia?
Answer: News that El Cid had appealed to Alfonso VI of Leon for help.
Explanation: The morale of the Almoravid besiegers significantly declined due to the spread of news that El Cid had sought assistance from Alfonso VI of León, leading to desertions.
How did El Cid exploit the low morale of the Almoravid forces during the recapture attempt?
Answer: He launched a surprise night attack with a cavalry group without waiting for reinforcements.
Explanation: El Cid capitalized on the Almoravid forces' low morale by launching a surprise night attack with his cavalry, without awaiting the promised reinforcements from Alfonso VI.
Describe El Cid's decisive attack on the Muslim camp on October 25, 1094.
Answer: A feigned retreat by El Cid's cavalry, leading to an ambush of the pursuing Muslim forces.
Explanation: El Cid's decisive attack on October 25, 1094, involved a strategic feigned retreat by his cavalry, drawing the Muslim forces into an ambush by concealed Christian soldiers.
What was the immediate consequence of El Cid's victory on October 25, 1094?
Answer: The establishment of the Lordship of Valencia and delayed Almoravid expansion.
Explanation: El Cid's victory on October 25, 1094, immediately led to the firm establishment of the Lordship of Valencia under his control and significantly delayed the Almoravid dynasty's expansion in the region.
What was the initial morale of the Muslim citizens of Valencia when the Almoravid army arrived to recapture the city?
Answer: High, believing their liberation was imminent.
Explanation: Upon the arrival of the Almoravid army, the Muslim citizens of Valencia experienced high morale, anticipating their imminent liberation from El Cid's rule.
On what date did El Cid launch his decisive attack on the Muslim camp, leading to an Almoravid rout?
Answer: October 25, 1094
Explanation: El Cid launched his decisive attack on the Muslim camp on the morning of October 25, 1094, resulting in a significant Almoravid rout.
What was the key element of El Cid's strategy to defeat the Almoravid forces on October 25, 1094?
Answer: A surprise night attack followed by an ambush after a feigned retreat.
Explanation: El Cid's key strategy on October 25, 1094, involved a surprise night attack, a feigned retreat by his cavalry, and a subsequent ambush of the pursuing Muslim forces.
The Lordship of Valencia, established by El Cid, eventually fell into Almoravid hands in 1102.
Answer: True
Explanation: The Lordship of Valencia, founded by El Cid, was eventually conquered by the Almoravids in 1102, eight years after its establishment.
The establishment of the Lordship of Valencia meant the city and its surrounding territories came under Muslim rule.
Answer: False
Explanation: The establishment of the Lordship of Valencia signified that the city and its surrounding territories transitioned from Muslim Taifa rule to Christian rule under El Cid.
The Almoravid dynasty's expansion in the region was permanently halted after El Cid's victory on October 25, 1094.
Answer: False
Explanation: While El Cid's victory on October 25, 1094, delayed Almoravid expansion, it was not permanently halted, as the Lordship of Valencia eventually fell to the Almoravids in 1102.
The Lordship of Valencia established by El Cid lasted for eight years before falling to the Almoravids.
Answer: True
Explanation: The Lordship of Valencia, established in 1094, indeed fell to the Almoravids in 1102, lasting for eight years.
What was the ultimate fate of the Lordship of Valencia established by El Cid?
Answer: It fell into Almoravid hands in 1102, eight years after its establishment.
Explanation: The Lordship of Valencia, established by El Cid, eventually fell to the Almoravids in 1102, eight years after its creation, despite his earlier victory.
What territorial change was the direct result of El Cid's conquest of Valencia in 1094?
Answer: The establishment of the Lordship of Valencia.
Explanation: El Cid's conquest of Valencia in 1094 directly led to the establishment of the Lordship of Valencia, bringing the city under Christian rule.
Which of the following was NOT a direct consequence of El Cid's victory on October 25, 1094?
Answer: The immediate fall of Valencia to the Almoravids.
Explanation: El Cid's victory on October 25, 1094, led to the firm establishment of the Lordship of Valencia and delayed Almoravid expansion; the city did not immediately fall to the Almoravids at that time.
How many years did the Lordship of Valencia, established by El Cid, last before it fell to the Almoravids?
Answer: Eight years
Explanation: The Lordship of Valencia, established in 1094, endured for eight years before it was conquered by the Almoravids in 1102.