Welcome!

Enter a player name to begin or load your saved progress.

South Vietnamese Popular Force Wiki2Web Clarity Challenge

Study Hints Create Teach
Global Score: 0
Trophies: 0 🏆

‹ Back

Score: 0 / 100

Study Guide: South Vietnamese Popular Force (PF) in the Vietnam War

Cheat Sheet:
South Vietnamese Popular Force (PF) in the Vietnam War Study Guide

Operational Capabilities and Challenges

The Popular Force and Regional Force units together were responsible for inflicting approximately 10% of the total PAVN/VC casualties during the Vietnam War.

Answer: False

Explanation: Collectively, the Popular Force and Regional Force units were responsible for inflicting an estimated 30% of the total PAVN/VC casualties throughout the course of the Vietnam War.

Return to Game

The PF and Regional Force units were particularly effective in roles such as ambush, reconnaissance, and detection compared to larger conventional forces.

Answer: True

Explanation: The Popular Force and Regional Force units demonstrated particular efficacy in specialized roles, including ambush, reconnaissance, and detection, often outperforming larger, less agile conventional forces in these capacities.

Return to Game

Desertion rates for the Self-Defense Corps/Popular Force decreased significantly between 1962 and 1965.

Answer: False

Explanation: Desertion rates for the Self-Defense Corps/Popular Force did not decrease; rather, they increased substantially between 1962 and 1965, indicating significant personnel attrition.

Return to Game

The Joint General Staff (JGS) prohibited the enlistment of 17-30 year olds into the Popular Forces, contributing to recruiting difficulties.

Answer: True

Explanation: The Joint General Staff (JGS) imposed restrictions on enlistment, specifically prohibiting individuals aged 17-30 from joining the Popular Forces, which consequently exacerbated recruiting challenges.

Return to Game

In October 1967, the Popular Forces were primarily armed with modern M16 rifles and M60 machine guns.

Answer: False

Explanation: In October 1967, the Popular Forces were primarily equipped with carbines and older Browning automatic rifles, rather than modern M16 rifles and M60 machine guns.

Return to Game

In October 1967, MACV estimated that over 2,000 Popular Forces platoons were directly supporting the revolutionary development effort.

Answer: False

Explanation: In October 1967, MACV estimated that 754 Popular Forces platoons, not over 2,000, were directly supporting the revolutionary development effort.

Return to Game

What percentage of total PAVN/VC casualties were inflicted by the PF and Regional Force units?

Answer: Approximately 30%

Explanation: The combined efforts of the Popular Force and Regional Force units were responsible for inflicting approximately 30% of the total PAVN/VC casualties.

Return to Game

Which of the following roles were PF and Regional Force units particularly adept at?

Answer: Ambushes, reconnaissance, and detection.

Explanation: PF and Regional Force units demonstrated particular adeptness in roles such as ambushes, reconnaissance, and detection.

Return to Game

What significant personnel issue plagued the Self-Defense Corps/Popular Force between 1962 and 1965?

Answer: High rates of desertion.

Explanation: High rates of desertion constituted a significant personnel issue plaguing the Self-Defense Corps/Popular Force between 1962 and 1965.

Return to Game

In early 1968, what was the primary disadvantage of the territorial forces' small arms compared to PAVN/VC forces?

Answer: They were Korean War-era weapons, leaving the forces outgunned.

Explanation: The primary disadvantage of the territorial forces' small arms in early 1968 was their Korean War-era origin, which rendered them outgunned by the PAVN/VC.

Return to Game

Which factor contributed to recruiting difficulties for the Popular Forces?

Answer: A ban on enlisting individuals aged 17-30 by the JGS.

Explanation: A contributing factor to recruiting difficulties for the Popular Forces was the JGS's prohibition on enlisting individuals aged 17-30.

Return to Game

What specific weapons were the Popular Forces primarily armed with in October 1967?

Answer: Carbines and older Browning automatic rifles.

Explanation: In October 1967, the Popular Forces were primarily armed with carbines and older Browning automatic rifles.

Return to Game

What was the estimated number of Popular Forces platoons directly supporting the revolutionary development effort in October 1967?

Answer: 754

Explanation: In October 1967, MACV estimated that 754 Popular Forces platoons were directly supporting the revolutionary development effort.

Return to Game

What was the monthly desertion rate for the Popular Forces during the first six months of 1966?

Answer: 27.0 per 1,000

Explanation: During the first six months of 1966, the monthly desertion rate for the Popular Forces was recorded at 27.0 per 1,000 personnel.

Return to Game

Command, Administration, and Integration

The province chiefs typically controlled Regional Forces companies, while district and village chiefs directed Popular Forces platoons.

Answer: True

Explanation: The command structure generally placed Regional Forces companies under the control of province chiefs, while district and village chiefs were responsible for directing Popular Forces platoons.

Return to Game

The JGS consolidated the 37 Popular Forces training camps into 19 camps in 1968 to improve training infrastructure.

Answer: True

Explanation: In 1968, the Joint General Staff (JGS) undertook a consolidation of the Popular Forces training infrastructure, reducing the number of camps from 37 to 19.

Return to Game

The Popular Force was integrated into the regular Army of the Republic of Vietnam (ARVN) command structure in 1970.

Answer: True

Explanation: The integration of the Popular Force into the regular Army of the Republic of Vietnam (ARVN) command structure was completed in 1970.

Return to Game

Province and district military staffs were generally unburdened by the management of territorial forces due to their small numbers.

Answer: False

Explanation: Province and district military staffs were frequently overwhelmed by the management of territorial forces, owing to the substantial number of Regional Force companies and Popular Force platoons they were responsible for.

Return to Game

The regular ARVN showed significant interest in the deployment and operational activities of the territorial forces, providing substantial support.

Answer: False

Explanation: The regular ARVN provided some training and supplies to the territorial forces but generally exhibited little interest in their deployment and operational activities.

Return to Game

What action did the Joint General Staff (JGS) take in 1966 to increase ARVN control over territorial forces?

Answer: Transformed the territorial command into a directorate of the JGS.

Explanation: In 1966, the Joint General Staff (JGS) took action to increase ARVN control over territorial forces by transforming the territorial command into a directorate of the JGS and establishing dedicated staff sections within Corps headquarters.

Return to Game

How did the regular ARVN generally view the deployment and operational activities of the territorial forces?

Answer: With little interest, despite providing some training and supplies.

Explanation: The regular ARVN generally displayed little interest in the deployment and operational activities of the territorial forces, notwithstanding the provision of some training and supplies.

Return to Game

What administrative change did the JGS implement in 1968 concerning Popular Forces training camps?

Answer: Reduced the number of camps from 37 to 19 and consolidated them.

Explanation: In 1968, the JGS implemented an administrative change by reducing the number of Popular Forces training camps from 37 to 19 and consolidating them.

Return to Game

What was the role of U.S. Army captains as territorial advisors?

Answer: Province Territorial Forces advisers, working on command and administration.

Explanation: U.S. Army captains served as Province Territorial Forces advisers, focusing their efforts on improving command, administration, and supply systems.

Return to Game

What did the JGS do in 1966 to improve ARVN control over territorial forces?

Answer: Created separate staff sections for Territorial Forces within each Corps headquarters.

Explanation: In 1966, the JGS improved ARVN control over territorial forces by creating separate staff sections for Territorial Forces within each Corps headquarters and transforming the territorial command into a directorate of the JGS.

Return to Game

Key Programs and Engagements

The Combined Action Program (CAP) involved integrating a U.S. Marine rifle squad, a Navy Corpsman, and a Popular Force platoon for hamlet security.

Answer: True

Explanation: The Combined Action Program (CAP) was characterized by the integration of a U.S. Marine rifle squad, a U.S. Navy Corpsman, and a Popular Force platoon, specifically for the purpose of enhancing hamlet security.

Return to Game

The Combined Action Program (CAP) reached its peak operational strength in January 1970 with approximately 50 Combined Action Platoons.

Answer: False

Explanation: The Combined Action Program (CAP) attained its peak operational strength in January 1970, but this peak comprised approximately 114 Combined Action Platoons, not 50.

Return to Game

Following the Tet Offensive in February 1968, General Westmoreland requested modern weaponry for territorial forces because their existing arms were outdated.

Answer: True

Explanation: Subsequent to the Tet Offensive in February 1968, General Westmoreland requested modern weaponry for territorial forces, citing the inadequacy of their existing Korean War-era arms against PAVN/VC equipment.

Return to Game

The Combined Action Program (CAP) was primarily instituted by which branch of the U.S. military in I Corps?

Answer: U.S. Marines

Explanation: The Combined Action Program (CAP) in I Corps was primarily instituted by the U.S. Marines.

Return to Game

What was the peak number of Combined Action Platoons (CAPs) in operation?

Answer: 114

Explanation: The Combined Action Program (CAP) reached its peak operational strength with 114 Combined Action Platoons.

Return to Game

Which of the following was listed as a key engagement involving the South Vietnamese Popular Force?

Answer: The Tet Offensive

Explanation: The Tet Offensive was listed as a key engagement involving the South Vietnamese Popular Force.

Return to Game

Comparative Roles: PF, RF, and VC Forces

The Popular Force resembled the local force and village-guerrilla component of the Viet Cong in its role and structure.

Answer: True

Explanation: The organizational structure and operational role of the Popular Force bore significant resemblance to the local force and village-guerrilla components of the Viet Cong.

Return to Game

The Popular Forces were primarily involved in static defense roles, similar to the Viet Cong's village guerrilla component.

Answer: True

Explanation: The Popular Forces primarily engaged in static defense roles, mirroring the function of the Viet Cong's village guerrilla component.

Return to Game

How did the Popular Force (PF) differ from the Regional Force (RF) in South Vietnam?

Answer: The PF was a part-time local militia for village defense, while the RF was a full-time force for provincial operations.

Explanation: The Popular Force (PF) functioned as a part-time local militia dedicated to village defense, whereas the Regional Force (RF) constituted a full-time military contingent operating at the provincial level.

Return to Game

Resource Allocation and Personnel

In 1965, General William Westmoreland planned to decrease the size of the Popular Force to allow more ARVN units to focus on offensive operations.

Answer: False

Explanation: In 1965, General William Westmoreland's plan involved expanding, not decreasing, the size of the Popular Force, with the objective of freeing up regular ARVN units for offensive operations.

Return to Game

In 1972, the Popular Forces budget constituted nearly 20% of the total South Vietnamese defense budget.

Answer: False

Explanation: In 1972, the budget allocated to the Popular Forces represented approximately 4.5% of the total South Vietnamese defense budget.

Return to Game

General Westmoreland adjusted his expansion plans for the Popular Forces downwards in June 1966 due to successful recruitment drives.

Answer: False

Explanation: In June 1966, General Westmoreland adjusted his expansion plans for the Popular Forces downwards due to high desertion rates and recruiting shortfalls, not successful recruitment drives.

Return to Game

The JGS proposed expanding the Popular Forces to nearly 3,000 platoons in 1969 to alleviate ARVN area security missions.

Answer: True

Explanation: In 1969, the JGS proposed expanding the Popular Forces to a total of 2,869 platoons, with the aim of relieving ARVN regular forces from area security duties.

Return to Game

What was the approximate percentage of the total defense budget allocated to the Popular Forces in 1972?

Answer: 4.5%

Explanation: In 1972, the Popular Forces received approximately 4.5% of the total South Vietnamese defense budget.

Return to Game

What was the net change in Popular Forces strength during 1965?

Answer: A net loss of approximately 25,000 troops.

Explanation: During 1965, the Popular Forces experienced a net loss of approximately 25,000 troops, primarily due to casualties and desertions, reducing their numbers to about 135,000 by the end of the year.

Return to Game

The JGS proposed expanding the Popular Forces to a total of how many platoons in 1969?

Answer: 2,869

Explanation: In 1969, the JGS proposed expanding the Popular Forces to a total of 2,869 platoons.

Return to Game