Enter a player name to begin or load your saved progress.
The "Stop Arming Terrorists Act" was designed to prohibit the allocation of U.S. Government funds for the provision of assistance to specific terrorist organizations and nations identified as supporting them.
Answer: True
Explanation: The legislative intent of the "Stop Arming Terrorists Act" was indeed to prohibit the allocation of U.S. Government funds towards assisting designated terrorist organizations and nations identified as state sponsors of terrorism.
The "Stop Arming Terrorists Act" additionally sought to prohibit U.S. funding directed towards nations identified as providing support to specified terrorist organizations.
Answer: True
Explanation: A key objective of the Act was to prohibit U.S. Government funds from being used to assist countries identified as supporting specified terrorist organizations.
The "Stop Arming Terrorists Act" was signed into law by the President in early 2017.
Answer: False
Explanation: The "Stop Arming Terrorists Act" was a proposed Act of Congress and was not signed into law in early 2017. Its provisions were later incorporated into the NDAA.
What was the principal objective of the "Stop Arming Terrorists Act"?
Answer: To prohibit the U.S. government from funding terrorist organizations and their state sponsors.
Explanation: The primary objective was to prevent U.S. government funds from being used to assist specific terrorist organizations and countries that support them.
Besides terrorist organizations, what other entities did the "Stop Arming Terrorists Act" seek to prohibit U.S. funding for?
Answer: Countries that support the specified terrorist organizations.
Explanation: The Act aimed to prohibit U.S. funding not only for terrorist organizations but also for countries identified as supporting them.
The original "Stop Arming Terrorists Act" proposal aimed to prevent U.S. funding for which specific types of entities?
Answer: Terrorist organizations and countries supporting them.
Explanation: The Act proposed to prohibit U.S. funding for both specific terrorist organizations and the countries identified as supporting them.
Tulsi Gabbard and Rand Paul served as the principal sponsors of the "Stop Arming Terrorists Act" during the 115th Congress.
Answer: True
Explanation: Representative Tulsi Gabbard and Senator Rand Paul were indeed the primary sponsors of the "Stop Arming Terrorists Act" during the 115th Congress.
Tulsi Gabbard introduced H.R. 608, asserting its necessity to terminate the practice of funding regime change wars.
Answer: True
Explanation: Representative Tulsi Gabbard introduced H.R. 608, stating that it was necessary to end the practice of funding regime change wars.
Representative Thomas Garrett Jr. (R–VA-5) served as a principal co-sponsor of H.R. 608, the House version of the Act.
Answer: True
Explanation: Thomas Garrett Jr. (R–VA-5) was indeed a key co-sponsor of H.R. 608.
Senator Rand Paul sponsored S. 532, representing the state of Kentucky.
Answer: True
Explanation: Senator Rand Paul, representing Kentucky, sponsored S. 532.
Representative Tulsi Gabbard successfully facilitated the inclusion of a provision germane to the "Stop Arming Terrorists Act" within the 2020 National Defense Authorization Act.
Answer: True
Explanation: Tulsi Gabbard successfully secured the inclusion of a provision related to the "Stop Arming Terrorists Act" in the 2020 National Defense Authorization Act.
Tulsi Gabbard contended that it is legal for the U.S. government to provide assistance to terrorist groups.
Answer: False
Explanation: Tulsi Gabbard argued that it is illegal for any American to provide assistance to terrorist groups and that the provision she passed would apply these rules to the U.S. government.
Representative Josh Gottheimer proposed an amendment on July 11, 2019, intended to broaden the enumeration of prohibited organizations within the NDAA.
Answer: True
Explanation: Representative Josh Gottheimer proposed an amendment on July 11, 2019, to expand the list of prohibited organizations within the NDAA.
What was Tulsi Gabbard's primary justification for introducing the "Stop Arming Terrorists Act"?
Answer: To prevent U.S. taxpayer money from funding regime change wars and supporting terrorist groups.
Explanation: Gabbard argued that it was necessary to end the practice of spending taxpayer dollars to fund regime change wars and to prevent support for terrorist groups.
Which of the following was NOT among the original co-sponsors of H.R. 608 mentioned in the source?
Answer: Rand Paul
Explanation: Rand Paul was a sponsor of the Senate version (S. 532), not an original co-sponsor of the House version (H.R. 608) mentioned in the source.
What action did Tulsi Gabbard take on June 13, 2019, concerning the "Stop Arming Terrorists Act"?
Answer: She secured the inclusion of a related provision in the FY2020 NDAA.
Explanation: On June 13, 2019, Tulsi Gabbard secured the inclusion of a provision related to the "Stop Arming Terrorists Act" in the FY2020 NDAA.
According to Tulsi Gabbard, what is the legal status of providing assistance to terrorist groups for private U.S. citizens?
Answer: It is illegal.
Explanation: Gabbard stated that it is illegal for any American citizen to provide money or assistance to terrorist groups.
H.R. 608 designated the bill number for the Senate version of the "Stop Arming Terrorists Act" introduced in early 2017.
Answer: False
Explanation: H.R. 608 was the bill number for the House version; the Senate version was designated S. 532.
H.R. 608 was formally introduced in the House of Representatives on January 23, 2017.
Answer: True
Explanation: The bill H.R. 608 was introduced in the House of Representatives on January 23, 2017.
As of November 2017, Rand Paul's Senate bill, S. 532, had accumulated 14 co-sponsors.
Answer: False
Explanation: As of November 2017, Senator Rand Paul's Senate bill, S. 532, had zero co-sponsors.
The Senate version of the bill, designated S. 532, was introduced on March 6, 2017.
Answer: True
Explanation: S. 532, the Senate version of the "Stop Arming Terrorists Act," was introduced on March 6, 2017.
Tulsi Gabbard's tweet concerning the "Stop Arming Terrorists Act" preceded the introduction of H.R. 608 by six days.
Answer: True
Explanation: The source indicates that Tulsi Gabbard's tweet occurred six days prior to the introduction of H.R. 608.
The abbreviation "S." in S. 532 signifies that the bill originated in the House of Representatives.
Answer: False
Explanation: The abbreviation "S." in legislative bill designations indicates that the bill originated in the Senate, not the House of Representatives.
On what date was H.R. 608, the House version of the bill, formally introduced?
Answer: January 23, 2017
Explanation: H.R. 608 was introduced in the House of Representatives on January 23, 2017.
How many co-sponsors did Rand Paul's Senate bill, S. 532, have as of November 2017?
Answer: Zero
Explanation: As of November 2017, Senator Rand Paul's Senate bill, S. 532, had zero co-sponsors.
What does the abbreviation "H.R." signify in the context of U.S. legislation like H.R. 608?
Answer: House of Representatives
Explanation: "H.R." signifies that a bill was introduced in the U.S. House of Representatives.
The initial proposal for the "Stop Arming Terrorists Act" explicitly identified Al Qaeda, Hamas, and Hizballah as targeted organizations.
Answer: False
Explanation: The original proposal explicitly named Al Qaeda, Jabhat Fateh al-Sham, and the Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant (ISIL), not Hamas or Hizballah.
Section 1228 of the NDAA FY2020 mandates the prohibition of Department of Defense funds being utilized to support specific terrorist organizations and their affiliates.
Answer: True
Explanation: Section 1228 of the NDAA FY2020 indeed prohibits the use of Department of Defense funds to support specific terrorist organizations and their affiliates.
Section 1228 of the NDAA FY2020 prohibits support to groups including Al Qaeda, ISIS, and Saudi Arabia.
Answer: False
Explanation: Section 1228 of the NDAA FY2020 prohibits support to groups including Al Qaeda and ISIS, among others. Saudi Arabia is not listed as a prohibited group in the provided text.
The provision secured by Representative Gabbard for the FY2020 NDAA was intended to prohibit the use of taxpayer funds for supporting entities engaged in arms trading with terrorist organizations.
Answer: True
Explanation: The provision aimed to prohibit taxpayer funds from supporting entities that trade arms with terrorist organizations, aligning with the Act's broader goals.
Josh Gottheimer's amendment proposed the inclusion of groups such as the Taliban and Al-Shabaab to the prohibited list.
Answer: False
Explanation: Josh Gottheimer's amendment proposed adding Hamas, Hizballah, Palestine Islamic Jihad, al-Shabaab, and the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps. The Taliban was not among the groups proposed for inclusion.
Section 1228 of the NDAA FY2020 prohibits the use of Department of Defense funds allocated for fiscal year 2021 to support prohibited groups.
Answer: False
Explanation: Section 1228 of the NDAA FY2020 pertains to funds for fiscal year 2020, not fiscal year 2021.
Section 1228 of the NDAA FY2020 prohibits the Department of Defense from knowingly providing support to the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps.
Answer: True
Explanation: The Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps is explicitly listed among the entities prohibited from receiving support under Section 1228 of the NDAA FY2020.
Under Section 1228 of the NDAA FY2020, which of the following entities is explicitly prohibited from receiving support?
Answer: Al-Shabaab
Explanation: Al-Shabaab is explicitly listed among the groups prohibited from receiving support under Section 1228 of the NDAA FY2020.
Under Section 1228 of the NDAA FY2020, which of the following groups is explicitly prohibited from receiving support?
Answer: Al-Shabaab
Explanation: Al-Shabaab is explicitly listed among the groups prohibited from receiving support under Section 1228 of the NDAA FY2020.
Which of the following organizations was proposed for inclusion by Josh Gottheimer's amendment?
Answer: Hamas
Explanation: Josh Gottheimer's amendment proposed adding Hamas, Hizballah, Palestine Islamic Jihad, al-Shabaab, and the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps to the prohibited list.
Under Section 1228 of the NDAA FY2020, funds are prohibited from being knowingly utilized to provide support to which of the following entities?
Answer: Any group affiliated with Al Qaeda
Explanation: Section 1228 explicitly prohibits the use of funds to knowingly provide support to Al Qaeda and any groups affiliated with it.
What was the stated goal of the provision included in the FY2020 NDAA by Tulsi Gabbard?
Answer: To prohibit U.S. government support for specific terrorist organizations and arms traders.
Explanation: The provision aimed to prohibit U.S. government support for specific terrorist organizations and entities trading arms with them.
What was the outcome of Representative Josh Gottheimer's amendment concerning the enumeration of prohibited organizations?
Answer: It successfully expanded the list within the NDAA.
Explanation: Josh Gottheimer's amendment successfully expanded the list of prohibited organizations within the NDAA.
Within the context of the "Stop Arming Terrorists Act," what does the term "assistance" encompass?
Answer: Financial aid, weapons, training, and intelligence.
Explanation: The term "assistance" in this context is broad and can include financial aid, weapons, training, and intelligence.
The Senate approved the NDAA FY2020, incorporating provisions analogous to the "Stop Arming Terrorists Act", on December 20, 2019.
Answer: True
Explanation: The Senate passed the NDAA FY2020 on December 20, 2019, which contained provisions related to the "Stop Arming Terrorists Act".
What is the significance of Section 1228 within the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2020 (NDAA FY2020)?
Answer: It prohibits the use of Department of Defense funds to support specific terrorist organizations.
Explanation: Section 1228 of the NDAA FY2020 specifically prohibits the use of Department of Defense funds to support designated terrorist organizations and their affiliates.
Which date marks the Senate's passage of the NDAA FY2020, which contained prohibitions related to arming terrorists?
Answer: December 20, 2019
Explanation: The Senate passed the NDAA FY2020 on December 20, 2019.
Annually, the National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) delineates which aspect of U.S. federal law?
Answer: Budget, expenditures, and policies of the Department of Defense
Explanation: The NDAA specifies the annual budget, expenditures, and policies for the Department of Defense.
What is the primary function of the National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA)?
Answer: To determine the annual budget and policies for the Department of Defense.
Explanation: The NDAA is the primary legislative vehicle for establishing the annual budget, expenditures, and policies of the Department of Defense.
An "Act of Congress" formally becomes law subsequent to its passage by both legislative chambers and its approval by the President, or following an override of a presidential veto.
Answer: True
Explanation: This statement accurately defines the process by which a bill becomes an Act of Congress.
The National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) is enacted annually to establish defense policy.
Answer: False
Explanation: The National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) is passed annually, not every five years, to set defense policy.
The term "co-sponsor" denotes a member of Congress who supports a bill introduced by another member and adds their name to it.
Answer: True
Explanation: This definition accurately describes the role of a co-sponsor in the legislative process.
A legislative "provision" is not a formal veto by the President, but rather a specific clause or requirement within a bill or law.
Answer: True
Explanation: A provision refers to a specific part of a legislative text, not a presidential veto.
An "amendment" constitutes a proposed modification or addition to a bill during its progression through the legislative process.
Answer: True
Explanation: This accurately defines an amendment within the context of legislative procedures.
The U.S. federal government's fiscal year runs from January 1st to December 31st.
Answer: False
Explanation: The U.S. federal government's fiscal year operates from October 1 to September 30.
Funds are considered "appropriated" upon Congressional passage of a law authorizing their expenditure for a designated purpose.
Answer: True
Explanation: The process of appropriation involves Congressional authorization for the use of funds for specific purposes.
The "Department of Defense" is responsible for managing U.S. foreign policy.
Answer: False
Explanation: The Department of Defense is primarily responsible for military forces and national security, not the formulation of U.S. foreign policy, which falls under the purview of the Department of State.
A "regime change war" is defined as a conflict initiated with the objective of establishing a new government within a nation.
Answer: True
Explanation: This definition accurately captures the essence of a regime change war.
A "state sponsor" of terrorism is a nation designated by the U.S. Department of State for its persistent provision of support for international terrorism.
Answer: True
Explanation: This statement correctly defines a state sponsor of terrorism according to U.S. designation criteria.
As delineated in the provided text, what is the definition of an "Act of Congress"?
Answer: A bill that has passed both chambers and been signed by the President (or overridden veto).
Explanation: An Act of Congress is a bill that has successfully passed both legislative chambers and received Presidential approval, or had a veto overridden.
In the context of congressional proceedings, what is the meaning of the term "introduced" when applied to a bill?
Answer: The bill has been formally presented for consideration.
Explanation: "Introduced" refers to the formal act of presenting a bill to a legislative body for consideration.
In legislative parlance, which description most accurately defines a "provision"?
Answer: A specific clause or requirement within a bill or law.
Explanation: A provision is a specific clause, stipulation, or requirement within a legislative document.
For the U.S. federal government, what temporal period does the term "fiscal year" denote?
Answer: October 1 to September 30
Explanation: The U.S. federal government's fiscal year runs from October 1 to September 30.
What is the designated role of the Department of Defense?
Answer: Managing the nation's military forces and ensuring national security.
Explanation: The Department of Defense is responsible for managing the nation's military forces and ensuring national security.
In the context of terrorism, what is the precise meaning of the designation "state sponsor"?
Answer: A country designated by the U.S. for repeatedly supporting international terrorism.
Explanation: A state sponsor of terrorism is a nation designated by the U.S. Department of State for its repeated support of international terrorism.
The article's maintenance notice indicates an over-reliance on primary sources and recommends the integration of secondary or tertiary sources.
Answer: True
Explanation: A maintenance notice within the source material suggests that the article relies too heavily on primary sources and would benefit from the inclusion of secondary or tertiary sources.
The "See also" section enumerates the "Justice Against Sponsors of Terrorism Act" as a related topic.
Answer: True
Explanation: The "See also" section of the source material lists the "Justice Against Sponsors of Terrorism Act" as a related legislative topic.
What image is featured in the infobox related to the "Stop Arming Terrorists Act"?
Answer: The Great Seal of the United States
Explanation: The infobox for the "Stop Arming Terrorists Act" features an image of the Great Seal of the United States.