Enter a player name to begin or load your saved progress.
The Kingdom of Yugoslavia was initially known as the Kingdom of Serbs, Croats, and Slovenes upon its formation.
Answer: True
Explanation: The Kingdom of Yugoslavia was established in 1918 under the name Kingdom of Serbs, Croats, and Slovenes.
From 1918 to 1922, the Kingdom of Serbs, Croats, and Slovenes utilized a new administrative system based on 33 centrally administered 'oblasts'.
Answer: False
Explanation: From 1918 to 1922, the Kingdom of Serbs, Croats, and Slovenes maintained the administrative divisions inherited from the pre-World War I era, not a new system of 33 'oblasts'.
The Vidovdan Constitution of 1921 established the Kingdom of Serbs, Croats, and Slovenes as a federal state.
Answer: False
Explanation: The Vidovdan Constitution of 1921 established the Kingdom of Serbs, Croats, and Slovenes as a unitary state, not a federal one.
Until 1922, the Kingdom maintained administrative divisions inherited solely from the former Kingdom of Serbia.
Answer: False
Explanation: Until 1922, the Kingdom maintained administrative divisions inherited from predecessor states, including Austria-Hungary and Montenegro, not solely from the former Kingdom of Serbia.
The administrative divisions between 1918 and 1922 included provinces like Bosnia and Herzegovina, Serbia, and Montenegro.
Answer: True
Explanation: The administrative divisions from 1918 to 1922 included provinces such as Bosnia and Herzegovina, Serbia, and Montenegro, reflecting the pre-World War I territorial arrangements.
Districts and counties from Montenegro were maintained as subdivisions until 1922.
Answer: True
Explanation: Until the 1922 administrative reform, the Kingdom maintained subdivisions inherited from predecessor states, including districts and counties from Montenegro.
The Kingdom of Serbs, Croats, and Slovenes was initially divided into 9 provinces.
Answer: False
Explanation: The Kingdom of Serbs, Croats, and Slovenes was initially divided into provinces based on pre-World War I administrative structures, not a uniform system of 9 provinces.
What was the administrative structure of the Kingdom of Serbs, Croats, and Slovenes between 1918 and 1922?
Answer: Pre-World War I administrative divisions inherited from predecessor states.
Explanation: Between 1918 and 1922, the Kingdom of Serbs, Croats, and Slovenes maintained the administrative divisions inherited from the pre-World War I era, based on the territories of Austria-Hungary, Serbia, and Montenegro.
Which of the following was listed as a province ('pokrajina') in the Kingdom of Serbs, Croats, and Slovenes between 1918 and 1922?
Answer: Bosnia and Herzegovina
Explanation: Bosnia and Herzegovina was one of the provinces ('pokrajine') maintained in the Kingdom of Serbs, Croats, and Slovenes between 1918 and 1922.
The administrative divisions from before World War I were maintained until which year?
Answer: 1922
Explanation: The administrative divisions from before World War I were maintained until 1922, when the 'oblasts' system was introduced.
What was the initial name of the country that later became known as the Kingdom of Yugoslavia?
Answer: Kingdom of Serbs, Croats, and Slovenes
Explanation: The initial name of the country that later became known as the Kingdom of Yugoslavia was the Kingdom of Serbs, Croats, and Slovenes.
Which of the following was NOT among the main provinces ('pokrajine') of the Kingdom of Serbs, Croats, and Slovenes between 1918 and 1922?
Answer: Vrbas Banovina
Explanation: Vrbas Banovina was not among the main provinces ('pokrajine') of the Kingdom of Serbs, Croats, and Slovenes between 1918 and 1922; it was a 'banate' established later in 1929.
Which of the following correctly describes the administrative subdivisions maintained until 1922?
Answer: Pre-WWI divisions from Austria-Hungary, Serbia, and Montenegro.
Explanation: The administrative subdivisions maintained until 1922 were the pre-World War I divisions from Austria-Hungary, Serbia, and Montenegro.
The Vidovdan Constitution of 1921 defined the Kingdom of Serbs, Croats, and Slovenes as what type of state?
Answer: A unitary state with central administration.
Explanation: The Vidovdan Constitution of 1921 defined the Kingdom of Serbs, Croats, and Slovenes as a unitary state with central administration.
The 'oblasts' introduced in 1922 were primarily named after prominent ethnic groups within the Kingdom to foster regional identity.
Answer: False
Explanation: The 'oblasts' introduced in 1922 were named after geographical features such as rivers and regions, not ethnic groups, to promote a unified Yugoslav identity.
The 'oblasts' established in 1922 were named using a convention that emphasized geographical features over ethnic affiliations.
Answer: True
Explanation: The 'oblasts' established in 1922 were named after geographical features such as rivers and regions, rather than ethnic affiliations, to promote a unified national identity.
The 'oblasts' system, implemented in 1922, consisted of 25 administrative units.
Answer: False
Explanation: The 'oblasts' system, implemented in 1922, consisted of 33 administrative units, not 25.
The administrative system prior to 1922 was based on 33 'oblasts'.
Answer: False
Explanation: The administrative system prior to 1922 was based on pre-World War I divisions, not on 33 'oblasts', which were introduced in 1922.
The Vidovdan Constitution's adoption in 1921 was a prerequisite for the creation of the 'oblasts'.
Answer: True
Explanation: The adoption of the Vidovdan Constitution in 1921, which established the Kingdom as a unitary state, was a prerequisite for the subsequent creation of the 'oblasts' administrative system in 1922.
What was the primary characteristic of the naming convention used for the 33 'oblasts' created in 1922?
Answer: They were named after major rivers and geographical features.
Explanation: The 33 'oblasts' created in 1922 were primarily named after rivers and geographical features, rather than ethnic groups, to foster a unified national identity.
Which of the following oblasts was established in 1922?
Answer: Zeta Oblast
Explanation: The Zeta Oblast was one of the administrative units established in 1922.
The 'oblasts' system, introduced in 1922, consisted of how many administrative units?
Answer: 33
Explanation: The 'oblasts' system, introduced in 1922, consisted of 33 administrative units.
In 1929, the Kingdom of Yugoslavia implemented a new administrative system consisting of 15 administrative units called 'banates'.
Answer: False
Explanation: In 1929, the Kingdom of Yugoslavia implemented a new administrative system consisting of nine administrative units called 'banates' (banovinas).
The borders of the banates established in 1929 were designed to align closely with the historical ethnic boundaries of the constituent peoples.
Answer: False
Explanation: The borders of the banates established in 1929 were intentionally designed to avoid alignment with historical ethnic or pre-World War I boundaries, aiming to centralize power.
Most banates were named after major rivers, with the exception being the Littoral Banovina.
Answer: True
Explanation: Most banates were named after major rivers, but the Littoral Banovina was named after its coastal location.
The City of Belgrade, along with Zemun and Pančevo, was administratively part of the Danube Banovina.
Answer: False
Explanation: The City of Belgrade, along with Zemun and Pančevo, constituted an administrative unit that was independent of the neighboring Danube Banovina.
The 1931 Constitution led to the complete dissolution of the banate system.
Answer: False
Explanation: The 1931 Constitution introduced slight modifications to the existing banate borders but did not lead to the complete dissolution of the banate system.
The Vrbas Banovina's capital was located in Sarajevo.
Answer: False
Explanation: The capital of the Vrbas Banovina was Banja Luka, not Sarajevo.
The Kingdom of Yugoslavia was renamed the Kingdom of Serbs, Croats, and Slovenes in 1929.
Answer: False
Explanation: In 1929, the Kingdom of Serbs, Croats, and Slovenes was renamed the Kingdom of Yugoslavia and reorganized with the introduction of banates (banovinas).
The Zeta Banovina's capital was Split.
Answer: False
Explanation: The capital of the Zeta Banovina was Cetinje, not Split.
The Littoral Banovina was named after a major river flowing through its territory.
Answer: False
Explanation: The Littoral Banovina was named after its coastal location, not a major river.
In which year was the administrative system of nine 'banates' (banovinas) implemented in the Kingdom of Yugoslavia?
Answer: 1929
Explanation: The system of nine 'banates' (banovinas) was implemented in the Kingdom of Yugoslavia in 1929.
Which of the following was a capital city of one of the nine banates established in 1929?
Answer: Niš
Explanation: Niš served as the capital of the Morava Banovina, one of the nine banates established in 1929.
Which banovina was an exception to the naming convention of being named after a river?
Answer: Littoral Banovina
Explanation: The Littoral Banovina was an exception to the naming convention, as it was named after its coastal location rather than a river.
What administrative status did Belgrade, Zemun, and Pančevo hold within the banate system?
Answer: They formed an independent administrative unit.
Explanation: Belgrade, Zemun, and Pančevo formed an administrative unit that was independent of the surrounding Danube Banovina.
What change occurred regarding the banates' borders in 1931?
Answer: Slight modifications were made to the existing banate borders.
Explanation: In 1931, slight modifications were made to the existing banate borders as part of constitutional changes.
Which of the following cities served as the capital of the Sava Banovina?
Answer: Zagreb
Explanation: Zagreb served as the capital of the Sava Banovina.
The Kingdom of Yugoslavia was renamed and reorganized with the introduction of 'banates' in what year?
Answer: 1929
Explanation: The Kingdom of Serbs, Croats, and Slovenes was renamed the Kingdom of Yugoslavia and reorganized with the introduction of 'banates' in 1929.
What was the capital of the Drava Banovina?
Answer: Ljubljana
Explanation: Ljubljana served as the capital of the Drava Banovina.
What was the capital of the Vrbas Banovina?
Answer: Banja Luka
Explanation: Banja Luka was the capital of the Vrbas Banovina.
The Banovina of Croatia was created in 1939 through the Cvetković-Maček Agreement.
Answer: True
Explanation: The Banovina of Croatia was established in 1939 as a result of the Cvetković-Maček Agreement.
The Banovina of Croatia was formed solely by merging the Sava and Littoral Banovinas.
Answer: False
Explanation: The Banovina of Croatia was formed by merging the Sava and Littoral Banovinas, along with incorporating territories from other banovinas where ethnic Croats formed the majority.
Zagreb served as the capital of the Banovina of Croatia.
Answer: True
Explanation: Zagreb was designated as the capital of the Banovina of Croatia.
The primary purpose of creating the Banovina of Croatia in 1939 was to appease Croatian political demands.
Answer: True
Explanation: The creation of the Banovina of Croatia in 1939 was primarily motivated by the need to address the political demands of Croatian representatives.
The creation of the Banovina of Croatia in 1939 involved incorporating territories where ethnic Croats formed a minority.
Answer: False
Explanation: The Banovina of Croatia, created in 1939, incorporated territories where ethnic Croats formed a majority, alongside the Sava and Littoral Banovinas.
Which administrative unit was established in 1939 through the Cvetković-Maček Agreement?
Answer: The Banovina of Croatia
Explanation: The Banovina of Croatia was established in 1939 through the Cvetković-Maček Agreement.
How was the territory of the Banovina of Croatia primarily constituted?
Answer: It merged the Sava and Littoral Banovinas, plus parts of others with Croat majorities.
Explanation: The Banovina of Croatia was constituted by merging the Sava and Littoral Banovinas and incorporating parts of other banovinas where ethnic Croats formed the majority.
The creation of the Banovina of Croatia in 1939 aimed to address which issue?
Answer: The long-standing political demands related to Croatia.
Explanation: The creation of the Banovina of Croatia in 1939 aimed to address the long-standing political demands related to Croatia.
The Banovina of Croatia, formed in 1939, incorporated territories from which other banovinas based on majority populations?
Answer: Drina, Dunav, Vrbas, and Zeta Banovinas.
Explanation: The Banovina of Croatia, formed in 1939, incorporated territories from the Drina, Dunav, Vrbas, and Zeta Banovinas, in addition to the Sava and Littoral Banovinas, where ethnic Croats formed the majority.
What was the capital of the Banovina of Croatia, established in 1939?
Answer: Zagreb
Explanation: Zagreb served as the capital of the Banovina of Croatia, established in 1939.
The administrative reforms, such as the shift to oblasts and banovinas, aimed to reinforce regional identities and decentralize power.
Answer: False
Explanation: The administrative reforms, including the introduction of oblasts and banovinas, were intended to centralize state power and diminish regional or ethnic identities, rather than reinforce them.
The administrative structure implemented in 1922 aimed to unify the population by promoting a common national identity.
Answer: True
Explanation: The administrative structure implemented in 1922, with its focus on geographical naming conventions for the 'oblasts', aimed to unify the population by promoting a common national identity.
The 'oblasts' system was replaced because it was highly popular across all regions of the country.
Answer: False
Explanation: The 'oblasts' system was replaced primarily because it was unpopular in several parts of the country, not because it was popular.
What was the stated rationale for designing the banate borders in a way that did not align with ethnic or historical boundaries?
Answer: To centralize power and diminish regional or ethnic identities.
Explanation: The banate borders were designed to avoid alignment with ethnic or historical boundaries to centralize power and diminish regional or ethnic identities.
What was the main goal behind the administrative reforms, such as the introduction of 'oblasts' and 'banovinas'?
Answer: To promote a unified Yugoslav identity and centralize the state.
Explanation: The main goal behind administrative reforms like the introduction of 'oblasts' and 'banovinas' was to promote a unified Yugoslav identity and centralize the state.
The 'oblasts' system, implemented in 1922, was eventually replaced primarily because:
Answer: It was found to be unpopular in several parts of the country.
Explanation: The 'oblasts' system was replaced primarily because it was found to be unpopular in several parts of the country.
The naming of 'oblasts' after rivers and regions, rather than ethnic groups, was intended to promote:
Answer: Yugoslavism and a unified national identity
Explanation: The naming of 'oblasts' after rivers and regions, rather than ethnic groups, was intended to promote Yugoslavism and a unified national identity.
Which administrative reform replaced the 'oblasts' system?
Answer: The implementation of the 'banates' (banovinas) system.
Explanation: The 'oblasts' system was replaced by the implementation of the 'banates' (banovinas) system in 1929.