Welcome!

Enter a player name to begin or load your saved progress.

Zeta Banovina Wiki2Web Clarity Challenge

Study Hints Create Teach
Global Score: 0
Trophies: 0 🏆

‹ Back

Score: 0 / 100

Study Guide: The Zeta Banovina: Administration, Geography, and Leadership (1929-1941)

Cheat Sheet:
The Zeta Banovina: Administration, Geography, and Leadership (1929-1941) Study Guide

Overview and Establishment

The Zeta Banovina was an independent nation that existed alongside the Kingdom of Yugoslavia, rather than an administrative subdivision.

Answer: False

Explanation: The Zeta Banovina was an administrative province and a devolved autonomous banate within the Kingdom of Yugoslavia, functioning as one of its subdivisions, not an independent nation.

Return to Game

The Zeta Banovina existed exclusively during the period of World War II, from 1939 to 1945.

Answer: False

Explanation: The Zeta Banovina existed from 1929 to 1941, a period commonly referred to as the Interwar period, which concluded with the Invasion of Yugoslavia.

Return to Game

King Peter I and King Alexander I were the monarchs of Yugoslavia during the entire existence of the Zeta Banovina.

Answer: False

Explanation: Alexander I and Peter II were the monarchs of Yugoslavia during the Zeta Banovina's existence.

Return to Game

The Zeta Banovina was officially established on September 3, 1931, coinciding with the enactment of the new Yugoslav Constitution.

Answer: False

Explanation: The Zeta Banovina was officially established on October 3, 1929, while the 1931 Yugoslav Constitution was enacted on September 3, 1931.

Return to Game

The 1931 Yugoslav Constitution was enacted prior to the establishment of the Zeta Banovina, setting up its initial framework.

Answer: False

Explanation: The Zeta Banovina was established on October 3, 1929, whereas the 1931 Yugoslav Constitution was enacted later, on September 3, 1931.

Return to Game

The 1931 Yugoslav Constitution abolished all regional administrative divisions, including the Zeta Banovina.

Answer: False

Explanation: The 1931 Yugoslav Constitution provided the legal framework for the administrative divisions of the Kingdom of Yugoslavia, including the definition of the borders for provinces like the Zeta Banovina, rather than abolishing them.

Return to Game

The Zeta Banovina was an administrative province within the Kingdom of Yugoslavia, functioning as one of its subdivisions.

Answer: True

Explanation: The Zeta Banovina was an administrative province, or banovina, within the Kingdom of Yugoslavia, functioning as one of its subdivisions and characterized as a devolved autonomous banate.

Return to Game

The Zeta Banovina existed from 1929 to 1941, a period commonly referred to as the Interwar period.

Answer: True

Explanation: The Zeta Banovina existed from 1929 to 1941, a period commonly referred to as the Interwar period, which falls between World War I and World War II.

Return to Game

Alexander I and Peter II were the monarchs of Yugoslavia during the Zeta Banovina's existence.

Answer: True

Explanation: During the period of the Zeta Banovina, the monarchs of Yugoslavia were Alexander I, who reigned from 1929 to 1934, and Peter II, who reigned from 1934 to 1941.

Return to Game

The Zeta Banovina was officially established on October 3, 1929.

Answer: True

Explanation: The Zeta Banovina was officially established on October 3, 1929.

Return to Game

The 1931 Yugoslav Constitution was enacted on September 3, 1931, serving as a key legal framework during the Zeta Banovina's active period.

Answer: True

Explanation: The 1931 Yugoslav Constitution was enacted on September 3, 1931, which was a key legal framework for the Kingdom of Yugoslavia during the time the Zeta Banovina was an active province.

Return to Game

What was the administrative role of the Zeta Banovina within the Kingdom of Yugoslavia?

Answer: An administrative province or banovina, functioning as a subdivision.

Return to Game

During which historical period did the Zeta Banovina exist?

Answer: The Interwar period, from 1929 to 1941.

Return to Game

Who were the two monarchs of Yugoslavia during the entire existence of the Zeta Banovina?

Answer: Alexander I and Peter II.

Return to Game

When was the Zeta Banovina officially established?

Answer: October 3, 1929.

Return to Game

What significant constitutional event for Yugoslavia occurred on September 3, 1931, during the Zeta Banovina's existence?

Answer: The enactment of the 1931 Yugoslav Constitution.

Return to Game

The 1931 Yugoslav Constitution was a key legal framework for the Kingdom of Yugoslavia, enacted during the time the Zeta Banovina was an active province. What was its enactment date?

Answer: September 3, 1931.

Return to Game

Which monarch reigned from 1929 to 1934 during the Zeta Banovina's existence?

Answer: Alexander I.

Return to Game

Which of the following was a key function of the 1931 Yugoslav Constitution regarding administrative divisions?

Answer: It provided the legal framework for administrative divisions, including border definitions.

Return to Game

Which monarch reigned from 1934 to 1941 during the Zeta Banovina's existence?

Answer: Peter II.

Return to Game

The Zeta Banovina was an administrative province within what larger political entity?

Answer: The Kingdom of Yugoslavia.

Return to Game

Geography and Demographics

The geographical scope of the Zeta Banovina was limited solely to the territory of present-day Montenegro.

Answer: False

Explanation: The Zeta Banovina encompassed the entire territory of present-day Montenegro, along with adjacent areas now part of Central Serbia, Croatia, Kosovo, and Bosnia and Herzegovina.

Return to Game

According to the 1931 census, the Zeta Banovina had a population of over one million inhabitants and an area of less than 20,000 square kilometers.

Answer: False

Explanation: The 1931 census reported the Zeta Banovina had a population of 925,516 inhabitants and an area of 30,997 square kilometers.

Return to Game

The northern boundaries of the Zeta Banovina were defined by the Sava and Danube rivers according to the 1931 Constitution.

Answer: False

Explanation: The 1931 Constitution defined the northern boundaries of the Zeta Banovina by the southern boundaries of the Littoral and Drina Banovinas, extending to the intersection of the Dragačevo, Žiča, and Studenica districts.

Return to Game

The eastern boundary of the Zeta Banovina was primarily defined by the Morava River, excluding several eastern districts.

Answer: False

Explanation: The eastern boundary of the Zeta Banovina followed the eastern boundaries of the Studenica, Deževa, Mitrovica, Drenica, and Drin districts, including them within the banovina's territory.

Return to Game

The southern boundary of the Zeta Banovina was entirely inland, never reaching the Adriatic Sea.

Answer: False

Explanation: The southern and western boundary of the Zeta Banovina coincided with the Yugoslav-Albanian State frontier, extending continuously until it reached the Adriatic Sea.

Return to Game

Only Montenegro and Albania contain territory that was formerly part of the Zeta Banovina.

Answer: False

Explanation: The territory that once belonged to the Zeta Banovina is now distributed among Montenegro, Kosovo, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Serbia, and Croatia, in addition to Albania.

Return to Game

The Zeta Banovina encompassed the entire territory of present-day Montenegro, along with adjacent areas now part of Central Serbia, Croatia, Kosovo, and Bosnia and Herzegovina.

Answer: True

Explanation: The Zeta Banovina encompassed the entire territory of present-day Montenegro, along with adjacent areas that are now part of Central Serbia, Croatia, Kosovo, and Bosnia and Herzegovina.

Return to Game

The 1931 census reported the Zeta Banovina had a population of 925,516 inhabitants and an area of 30,997 square kilometers.

Answer: True

Explanation: Based on the 1931 census, the Zeta Banovina had a population of 925,516 inhabitants and covered an area of 30,997 square kilometers.

Return to Game

The 1931 Constitution defined the northern boundaries of the Zeta Banovina by the southern boundaries of the Littoral and Drina Banovinas, extending to the intersection of Dragačevo, Žiča, and Studenica districts.

Answer: True

Explanation: According to the 1931 Constitution of the Kingdom of Yugoslavia, the northern boundaries of the Zeta Banovina were determined by the southern boundaries of the Littoral and Drina Banovinas, extending to the intersection point of the Dragačevo, Žiča, and Studenica districts.

Return to Game

The eastern boundary of the Zeta Banovina followed the eastern boundaries of the Studenica, Deževa, Mitrovica, Drenica, and Drin districts, including them within the banovina's territory.

Answer: True

Explanation: From the intersection of the Dragačevo, Žiča, and Studenica districts, the eastern boundary of the Zeta Banovina followed the eastern boundaries of the Studenica, Deževa, Mitrovica, Drenica, and Drin districts, with all these districts being included within the banovina's territory.

Return to Game

The southern and western boundary of the Zeta Banovina coincided with the Yugoslav-Albanian State frontier, extending to the Adriatic Sea.

Answer: True

Explanation: The southern and western boundary of the Zeta Banovina coincided with the Yugoslav-Albanian State frontier, extending continuously until it reached the Adriatic Sea.

Return to Game

Modern-day Montenegro, Kosovo, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Serbia, and Croatia all include territory that was once part of the Zeta Banovina.

Answer: True

Explanation: The territory that once belonged to the Zeta Banovina is now distributed among several modern-day countries: Montenegro, Kosovo, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Serbia, and Croatia.

Return to Game

Which modern-day country's entire territory was encompassed by the Zeta Banovina?

Answer: Montenegro.

Return to Game

According to the 1931 census, what was the approximate population of the Zeta Banovina?

Answer: 925,516 inhabitants.

Return to Game

According to the 1931 Constitution, the northern boundaries of the Zeta Banovina extended to the intersection point of which three districts?

Answer: Dragačevo, Žiča, and Studenica.

Return to Game

Which of the following modern-day countries does NOT include territory that was once part of the Zeta Banovina?

Answer: Slovenia.

Return to Game

What was the area of the Zeta Banovina in square kilometers, according to the 1931 census?

Answer: 30,997 sq km.

Return to Game

The southern and western boundary of the Zeta Banovina was defined by its coincidence with which international border?

Answer: The Yugoslav-Albanian State frontier.

Return to Game

Which of the following districts was NOT mentioned as part of the eastern boundary delineation of the Zeta Banovina?

Answer: Morava.

Return to Game

What was the approximate area of the Zeta Banovina in square miles, according to the 1931 census?

Answer: 11,968 square miles.

Return to Game

The eastern boundary of the Zeta Banovina included which of the following districts?

Answer: Studenica.

Return to Game

Administrative Structure and Capital

Podgorica served as the capital of the Zeta Banovina throughout its entire existence.

Answer: False

Explanation: Cetinje, a city with historical significance, was designated as the capital of the Zeta Banovina, not Podgorica.

Return to Game

The Zeta Banovina was characterized as a centralized, directly governed province with no degree of self-governance.

Answer: False

Explanation: The Zeta Banovina was a devolved autonomous banate, indicating a regional administrative unit with a degree of self-governance under the central authority of the Kingdom of Yugoslavia.

Return to Game

Belgrade and Zagreb were listed as major cities within the Zeta Banovina.

Answer: False

Explanation: Belgrade and Zagreb were not listed among the cities and towns that were part of the Zeta Banovina.

Return to Game

The 'Ban' was a ceremonial title with no real administrative power in the Zeta Banovina.

Answer: False

Explanation: The 'Ban' was the chief administrator or governor of the Zeta Banovina, overseeing its devolved autonomous governance, indicating significant administrative power.

Return to Game

Cetinje, a city with historical significance, was designated as the capital of the Zeta Banovina.

Answer: True

Explanation: Cetinje, a city with historical significance in the region, was designated as the capital of the Zeta Banovina.

Return to Game

The Zeta Banovina was a devolved autonomous banate, indicating a degree of self-governance under the central authority of the Kingdom of Yugoslavia.

Answer: True

Explanation: The Zeta Banovina was characterized as a devolved autonomous banate, indicating a regional administrative unit with a degree of self-governance under the central authority of the Kingdom of Yugoslavia.

Return to Game

What city served as the capital of the Zeta Banovina?

Answer: Cetinje.

Return to Game

What type of government structure best describes the Zeta Banovina?

Answer: A devolved autonomous banate.

Return to Game

Which of the following cities was NOT listed as part of the Zeta Banovina at some point during its existence?

Answer: Belgrade.

Return to Game

What was the role of the 'Ban' in the Zeta Banovina?

Answer: The chief administrator or governor.

Return to Game

Dissolution and Post-War Reorganization

The Zeta Banovina ceased to exist due to internal political reforms within Yugoslavia in 1939.

Answer: False

Explanation: The Zeta Banovina ceased to exist following the Invasion of Yugoslavia on April 17, 1941, not due to internal political reforms in 1939.

Return to Game

In 1939, the entire coastal region of the Zeta Banovina, including its capital Cetinje, was transferred to the Banovina of Croatia.

Answer: False

Explanation: In 1939, predominantly Catholic areas from Konavle to Pelješac, including Dubrovnik, were merged into the Banovina of Croatia, not the entire coastal region or Cetinje.

Return to Game

Following the 1941 Axis occupation, the entire remaining territory of the Zeta Banovina was annexed solely by Fascist Italy.

Answer: False

Explanation: After the Axis occupation in 1941, only a small portion around the Gulf of Kotor was annexed by Fascist Italy, while other parts were incorporated into Italian-occupied Montenegro and Albania, German-occupied Serbia, and the Independent State of Croatia.

Return to Game

After World War II, the entire territory of the former Zeta Banovina was unified into a single Socialist Republic of Montenegro.

Answer: False

Explanation: After World War II, the territory of the former Zeta Banovina was divided and integrated into the federal Socialist Yugoslavia, becoming parts of Montenegro, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Serbia, and Croatia.

Return to Game

Dubrovnik remained an independent city-state throughout the existence of the Zeta Banovina.

Answer: False

Explanation: Dubrovnik was initially part of the Zeta Banovina but was later merged with the new Banovina of Croatia in 1939.

Return to Game

The Gulf of Kotor region became part of German-occupied Serbia after the 1941 invasion.

Answer: False

Explanation: During the World War II occupation in 1941, a small area around the Gulf of Kotor was specifically annexed by Fascist Italy, not German-occupied Serbia.

Return to Game

The Invasion of Yugoslavia on April 17, 1941, marked the dissolution of the Zeta Banovina.

Answer: True

Explanation: The Zeta Banovina ceased to exist following the Invasion of Yugoslavia on April 17, 1941, which marked the beginning of World War II occupation in the region.

Return to Game

In 1939, predominantly Catholic areas from Konavle to Pelješac, including Dubrovnik, were merged into the Banovina of Croatia from the Zeta Banovina.

Answer: True

Explanation: In 1939, predominantly Catholic areas of the Zeta Banovina, specifically from Konavle to Pelješac and including the city of Dubrovnik, were merged into the newly established Banovina of Croatia.

Return to Game

After Axis occupation in 1941, a portion around the Gulf of Kotor was annexed by Fascist Italy, while other parts were incorporated into Italian-occupied Montenegro and Albania, German-occupied Serbia, and the Independent State of Croatia.

Answer: True

Explanation: After the Axis Powers occupied the remaining area of the Zeta Banovina in 1941, a small portion around the Gulf of Kotor was annexed by Fascist Italy. Much of the rest was incorporated into Italian-occupied Montenegro and Albania, while eastern areas became part of German-occupied Serbia, and western areas were included in the Independent State of Croatia.

Return to Game

After World War II, the territory of the former Zeta Banovina was divided and integrated into the federal Socialist Yugoslavia, becoming parts of Montenegro, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Serbia, and Croatia.

Answer: True

Explanation: Following World War II, the territory that once comprised the Zeta Banovina was divided and integrated into the federal Socialist Yugoslavia, specifically becoming parts of Montenegro, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Serbia, and Croatia.

Return to Game

What event directly led to the dissolution of the Zeta Banovina?

Answer: The Invasion of Yugoslavia on April 17, 1941.

Return to Game

Which of the following areas was merged from the Zeta Banovina into the newly established Banovina of Croatia in 1939?

Answer: Predominantly Catholic areas from Konavle to Pelješac, including Dubrovnik.

Return to Game

After the Axis occupation in 1941, what happened to a small portion of the Zeta Banovina around the Gulf of Kotor?

Answer: It was annexed by Fascist Italy.

Return to Game

How was the territory of the former Zeta Banovina reorganized after World War II?

Answer: It was divided and integrated into federal Socialist Yugoslavia, becoming parts of Montenegro, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Serbia, and Croatia.

Return to Game

Which of the following was NOT a modern-day country that received territory from the former Zeta Banovina after World War II?

Answer: Slovenia.

Return to Game

Which of the following cities was part of the Zeta Banovina until 1939?

Answer: Dubrovnik.

Return to Game

What was the primary reason for the dissolution of the Zeta Banovina?

Answer: The Invasion of Yugoslavia.

Return to Game

After the Axis occupation in 1941, much of the remaining Zeta Banovina was incorporated into which two Italian-occupied territories?

Answer: Italian-occupied Montenegro and Albania.

Return to Game

Bans of Zeta: Leadership and Terms

Uroš Krulj was the first Ban of Zeta, serving from 1929 to 1931.

Answer: False

Explanation: Krsta Smiljanić was the first Ban of Zeta, serving from October 9, 1929, to January 10, 1931. Uroš Krulj succeeded him as the second Ban.

Return to Game

Krsta Smiljanić was affiliated with the Yugoslav Radical Union and served under Peter II of Yugoslavia.

Answer: False

Explanation: Krsta Smiljanić was affiliated with the Military and served as Ban under the reign of Alexander I of Yugoslavia.

Return to Game

Aleksa Stanišić immediately succeeded Krsta Smiljanić as Ban of Zeta.

Answer: False

Explanation: Uroš Krulj succeeded Krsta Smiljanić as the second Ban of Zeta. Aleksa Stanišić was the third Ban.

Return to Game

Uroš Krulj served from 1932 to 1934 and was affiliated with the Yugoslav Radical Union.

Answer: False

Explanation: Uroš Krulj served from January 10, 1931, to July 3, 1932, and was affiliated with the Yugoslav Radical Peasants' Democracy (JRSD).

Return to Game

Aleksa Stanišić was the fourth Ban of Zeta, born in Trebinje.

Answer: False

Explanation: Aleksa Stanišić was the third Ban of Zeta, born in Prijepolje. Petar Ivanišević was the fifth Ban, born in Trebinje.

Return to Game

Aleksa Stanišić served from 1934 to 1936 and was affiliated with the Military.

Answer: False

Explanation: Aleksa Stanišić served from July 3, 1932, to April 23, 1934, and was affiliated with the Yugoslav Radical Peasants' Democracy (JRSD).

Return to Game

Petar Ivanišević became Ban after Aleksa Stanišić, serving under King Alexander I.

Answer: False

Explanation: Mujo Sočica became the fourth Ban of Zeta after Aleksa Stanišić, serving under Prince Paul of Yugoslavia. Petar Ivanišević was the fifth Ban.

Return to Game

Mujo Sočica served from 1931 to 1932 and was affiliated with the Yugoslav Radical Peasants' Democracy.

Answer: False

Explanation: Mujo Sočica served from April 23, 1934, to August 13, 1936, and was affiliated with the Yugoslav Radical Union (JRZ).

Return to Game

Petar Ivanišević was the sixth Ban of Zeta, born in Jagodina.

Answer: False

Explanation: Petar Ivanišević was the fifth Ban of Zeta, born in Trebinje. Božidar Krstić was the sixth Ban, born in Jagodina.

Return to Game

Petar Ivanišević served from 1934 to 1936 and was affiliated with the Military.

Answer: False

Explanation: Petar Ivanišević served from August 13, 1936, to May 25, 1939, and was affiliated with the Yugoslav Radical Union (JRZ).

Return to Game

Božidar Krstić was the fifth Ban of Zeta, serving for over three years.

Answer: False

Explanation: Božidar Krstić was the sixth Ban of Zeta, serving for 1 year and 306 days, not over three years.

Return to Game

Božidar Krstić was affiliated with the Military and was born in Plužine.

Answer: False

Explanation: Božidar Krstić was affiliated with the Yugoslav Radical Union (JRZ) and was born in Jagodina.

Return to Game

Blažo Đukanović was the last Ban of Zeta, serving for over a year until 1941.

Answer: False

Explanation: Blažo Đukanović was the last Ban of Zeta, but his term was notably brief, lasting only 21 days from April 1 to April 17, 1941.

Return to Game

Blažo Đukanović was affiliated with the Yugoslav Radical Union and served under Alexander I.

Answer: False

Explanation: Blažo Đukanović was affiliated with the Military and served as Ban under the monarch Peter II of Yugoslavia.

Return to Game

Uroš Krulj and Mujo Sočica were the two Bans of Zeta affiliated with the Military.

Answer: False

Explanation: Krsta Smiljanić and Blažo Đukanović were the two Bans of Zeta affiliated with the Military. Uroš Krulj was affiliated with JRSD and Mujo Sočica with JRZ.

Return to Game

Petar Ivanišević and Božidar Krstić were affiliated with the Yugoslav Radical Peasants' Democracy (JRSD).

Answer: False

Explanation: Petar Ivanišević and Božidar Krstić were affiliated with the Yugoslav Radical Union (JRZ). Uroš Krulj and Aleksa Stanišić were affiliated with the JRSD.

Return to Game

Krsta Smiljanić, Uroš Krulj, and Blažo Đukanović were affiliated with the Yugoslav Radical Union (JRZ).

Answer: False

Explanation: Krsta Smiljanić and Blažo Đukanović were affiliated with the Military. Uroš Krulj was affiliated with the Yugoslav Radical Peasants' Democracy (JRSD). Mujo Sočica, Petar Ivanišević, and Božidar Krstić were affiliated with the Yugoslav Radical Union (JRZ).

Return to Game

Mujo Sočica served the longest term as Ban of Zeta, exceeding three years.

Answer: False

Explanation: The longest term served by a Ban of Zeta was 2 years and 285 days, held by Petar Ivanišević. Mujo Sočica served for 2 years and 112 days.

Return to Game

Božidar Krstić was born in Ljubiš.

Answer: False

Explanation: Božidar Krstić was born in Jagodina. Krsta Smiljanić was born in Ljubiš.

Return to Game

Krsta Smiljanić was the first Ban of Zeta, serving from October 9, 1929, to January 10, 1931.

Answer: True

Explanation: The first Ban of Zeta was Krsta Smiljanić, who served from October 9, 1929, to January 10, 1931, a term lasting 1 year and 93 days.

Return to Game

Who was the first Ban of Zeta?

Answer: Krsta Smiljanić.

Return to Game

Krsta Smiljanić, the first Ban of Zeta, was affiliated with which group?

Answer: The Military.

Return to Game

Who succeeded Krsta Smiljanić as the Ban of Zeta?

Answer: Uroš Krulj.

Return to Game

Uroš Krulj, the second Ban of Zeta, was affiliated with which political party?

Answer: Yugoslav Radical Peasants' Democracy (JRSD).

Return to Game

Aleksa Stanišić, the third Ban of Zeta, was born in which city, now part of Serbia?

Answer: Prijepolje.

Return to Game

Mujo Sočica served as Ban of Zeta under which monarch or regent?

Answer: Prince Paul of Yugoslavia (as regent).

Return to Game

What was the political affiliation of Mujo Sočica, the fourth Ban of Zeta?

Answer: Yugoslav Radical Union (JRZ).

Return to Game

Petar Ivanišević, the fifth Ban of Zeta, was born in which city, now part of Bosnia and Herzegovina?

Answer: Trebinje.

Return to Game

What was the longest term served by any Ban of Zeta?

Answer: Petar Ivanišević, 2 years and 285 days.

Return to Game

Božidar Krstić, the sixth Ban of Zeta, was born in which city, now located in Serbia?

Answer: Jagodina.

Return to Game

Who was the last Ban of Zeta?

Answer: Blažo Đukanović.

Return to Game

Blažo Đukanović, the last Ban of Zeta, served for how many days?

Answer: 21 days.

Return to Game

Which two Bans of Zeta were affiliated with the Military?

Answer: Krsta Smiljanić and Blažo Đukanović.

Return to Game

Which three Bans of Zeta were affiliated with the Yugoslav Radical Union (JRZ)?

Answer: Mujo Sočica, Petar Ivanišević, and Božidar Krstić.

Return to Game

Which Ban of Zeta was born in Mostar?

Answer: Uroš Krulj.

Return to Game

Which Ban of Zeta was born in Plužine?

Answer: Mujo Sočica.

Return to Game

Under which monarch did Krsta Smiljanić, the first Ban of Zeta, serve?

Answer: Alexander I.

Return to Game

What was the duration of Uroš Krulj's term as Ban of Zeta?

Answer: 1 year and 176 days.

Return to Game

Aleksa Stanišić served as Ban of Zeta for how long?

Answer: 1 year and 293 days.

Return to Game

Mujo Sočica's term as Ban of Zeta lasted for how many days?

Answer: 2 years and 112 days.

Return to Game

Petar Ivanišević's term as Ban of Zeta lasted for how many days?

Answer: 2 years and 285 days.

Return to Game

Božidar Krstić served as Ban of Zeta for how long?

Answer: 1 year and 306 days.

Return to Game

Which Ban of Zeta was born in Ljubiš, now part of Serbia?

Answer: Krsta Smiljanić.

Return to Game

What was the term length of the shortest-serving Ban of Zeta?

Answer: 21 days.

Return to Game

Which of the following was NOT a political affiliation of any Ban of Zeta mentioned in the source?

Answer: Communist Party of Yugoslavia.

Return to Game

Which of the following cities was the birthplace of Aleksa Stanišić?

Answer: Prijepolje.

Return to Game

Which of the following cities was the birthplace of Petar Ivanišević?

Answer: Trebinje.

Return to Game

Which of the following cities was the birthplace of Božidar Krstić?

Answer: Jagodina.

Return to Game

Which of the following was NOT a political affiliation of a Ban of Zeta?

Answer: Socialist Party.

Return to Game

Symbols and Contextual Information

The Zeta Banovina was named after a prominent mountain range that ran through its territory.

Answer: False

Explanation: The province was named after the Zeta River, which also gave its name to a medieval state, not a mountain range.

Return to Game

The source material provides a unique flag specifically designed for the Zetska Banovina, distinct from the Kingdom of Yugoslavia's flag.

Answer: False

Explanation: The flag of Zetska Banovina, as represented in the source material, is specifically identified as the Flag of the Kingdom of Yugoslavia, not a unique design.

Return to Game

The source material depicts a unique coat of arms for the Zetska Banovina, separate from the Kingdom of Yugoslavia's emblem.

Answer: False

Explanation: The coat of arms of Zetska Banovina, as depicted in the source material, is specifically identified as the Coat of arms of the Kingdom of Yugoslavia, not a separate emblem.

Return to Game

The source material includes a map showing the Zeta Banovina as an island nation separate from the main Yugoslav territory.

Answer: False

Explanation: The locator map visually represents the Zeta Banovina in red, situated within the larger territory of the Kingdom of Yugoslavia, which is depicted in light yellow, indicating it was not an island nation.

Return to Game

The official name of the Zeta Banovina was primarily in Montenegrin, with Serbo-Croatian as a secondary translation.

Answer: False

Explanation: The primary language used for the official name of the Zeta Banovina was Serbo-Croatian, appearing as Zetska banovina in Latin script and Zetska banovina in Cyrillic script.

Return to Game

The province of Zeta Banovina was named after the Zeta River, which also gave its name to a medieval state.

Answer: True

Explanation: The province was named after the Zeta River. This river also historically gave its name to the medieval state of Zeta, which roughly corresponded to the area of modern-day Montenegro.

Return to Game

From what geographical feature did the Zeta Banovina derive its name?

Answer: The Zeta River.

Return to Game

What was the primary language used for the official name of the Zeta Banovina?

Answer: Serbo-Croatian.

Return to Game

The flag of Zetska Banovina, as represented in the source material, was identified as which flag?

Answer: The Flag of the Kingdom of Yugoslavia.

Return to Game

What historical entity, existing from 1919 to 1929, is mentioned in the 'See also' section as related to the Zeta Banovina?

Answer: The Zeta Oblast.

Return to Game

The Zeta Banovina was known in Serbo-Croatian by which of the following names?

Answer: Zetska banovina or Zetska banovina.

Return to Game

The coat of arms of Zetska Banovina, as depicted in the source, was specifically identified as which coat of arms?

Answer: The Coat of arms of the Kingdom of Yugoslavia.

Return to Game

The locator map in the source visually represents the Zeta Banovina in what color within the Kingdom of Yugoslavia?

Answer: Red.

Return to Game