Enter a player name to begin or load your saved progress.
The Zeta Banovina was an independent nation that existed alongside the Kingdom of Yugoslavia, rather than an administrative subdivision.
Answer: False
Explanation: The Zeta Banovina was an administrative province and a devolved autonomous banate within the Kingdom of Yugoslavia, functioning as one of its subdivisions, not an independent nation.
The Zeta Banovina existed exclusively during the period of World War II, from 1939 to 1945.
Answer: False
Explanation: The Zeta Banovina existed from 1929 to 1941, a period commonly referred to as the Interwar period, which concluded with the Invasion of Yugoslavia.
King Peter I and King Alexander I were the monarchs of Yugoslavia during the entire existence of the Zeta Banovina.
Answer: False
Explanation: Alexander I and Peter II were the monarchs of Yugoslavia during the Zeta Banovina's existence.
The Zeta Banovina was officially established on September 3, 1931, coinciding with the enactment of the new Yugoslav Constitution.
Answer: False
Explanation: The Zeta Banovina was officially established on October 3, 1929, while the 1931 Yugoslav Constitution was enacted on September 3, 1931.
The 1931 Yugoslav Constitution was enacted prior to the establishment of the Zeta Banovina, setting up its initial framework.
Answer: False
Explanation: The Zeta Banovina was established on October 3, 1929, whereas the 1931 Yugoslav Constitution was enacted later, on September 3, 1931.
The 1931 Yugoslav Constitution abolished all regional administrative divisions, including the Zeta Banovina.
Answer: False
Explanation: The 1931 Yugoslav Constitution provided the legal framework for the administrative divisions of the Kingdom of Yugoslavia, including the definition of the borders for provinces like the Zeta Banovina, rather than abolishing them.
The Zeta Banovina was an administrative province within the Kingdom of Yugoslavia, functioning as one of its subdivisions.
Answer: True
Explanation: The Zeta Banovina was an administrative province, or banovina, within the Kingdom of Yugoslavia, functioning as one of its subdivisions and characterized as a devolved autonomous banate.
The Zeta Banovina existed from 1929 to 1941, a period commonly referred to as the Interwar period.
Answer: True
Explanation: The Zeta Banovina existed from 1929 to 1941, a period commonly referred to as the Interwar period, which falls between World War I and World War II.
Alexander I and Peter II were the monarchs of Yugoslavia during the Zeta Banovina's existence.
Answer: True
Explanation: During the period of the Zeta Banovina, the monarchs of Yugoslavia were Alexander I, who reigned from 1929 to 1934, and Peter II, who reigned from 1934 to 1941.
The Zeta Banovina was officially established on October 3, 1929.
Answer: True
Explanation: The Zeta Banovina was officially established on October 3, 1929.
The 1931 Yugoslav Constitution was enacted on September 3, 1931, serving as a key legal framework during the Zeta Banovina's active period.
Answer: True
Explanation: The 1931 Yugoslav Constitution was enacted on September 3, 1931, which was a key legal framework for the Kingdom of Yugoslavia during the time the Zeta Banovina was an active province.
What was the administrative role of the Zeta Banovina within the Kingdom of Yugoslavia?
Answer: An administrative province or banovina, functioning as a subdivision.
During which historical period did the Zeta Banovina exist?
Answer: The Interwar period, from 1929 to 1941.
Who were the two monarchs of Yugoslavia during the entire existence of the Zeta Banovina?
Answer: Alexander I and Peter II.
What significant constitutional event for Yugoslavia occurred on September 3, 1931, during the Zeta Banovina's existence?
Answer: The enactment of the 1931 Yugoslav Constitution.
The 1931 Yugoslav Constitution was a key legal framework for the Kingdom of Yugoslavia, enacted during the time the Zeta Banovina was an active province. What was its enactment date?
Answer: September 3, 1931.
Which monarch reigned from 1929 to 1934 during the Zeta Banovina's existence?
Answer: Alexander I.
Which of the following was a key function of the 1931 Yugoslav Constitution regarding administrative divisions?
Answer: It provided the legal framework for administrative divisions, including border definitions.
Which monarch reigned from 1934 to 1941 during the Zeta Banovina's existence?
Answer: Peter II.
The Zeta Banovina was an administrative province within what larger political entity?
Answer: The Kingdom of Yugoslavia.
The geographical scope of the Zeta Banovina was limited solely to the territory of present-day Montenegro.
Answer: False
Explanation: The Zeta Banovina encompassed the entire territory of present-day Montenegro, along with adjacent areas now part of Central Serbia, Croatia, Kosovo, and Bosnia and Herzegovina.
According to the 1931 census, the Zeta Banovina had a population of over one million inhabitants and an area of less than 20,000 square kilometers.
Answer: False
Explanation: The 1931 census reported the Zeta Banovina had a population of 925,516 inhabitants and an area of 30,997 square kilometers.
The northern boundaries of the Zeta Banovina were defined by the Sava and Danube rivers according to the 1931 Constitution.
Answer: False
Explanation: The 1931 Constitution defined the northern boundaries of the Zeta Banovina by the southern boundaries of the Littoral and Drina Banovinas, extending to the intersection of the Dragačevo, Žiča, and Studenica districts.
The eastern boundary of the Zeta Banovina was primarily defined by the Morava River, excluding several eastern districts.
Answer: False
Explanation: The eastern boundary of the Zeta Banovina followed the eastern boundaries of the Studenica, Deževa, Mitrovica, Drenica, and Drin districts, including them within the banovina's territory.
The southern boundary of the Zeta Banovina was entirely inland, never reaching the Adriatic Sea.
Answer: False
Explanation: The southern and western boundary of the Zeta Banovina coincided with the Yugoslav-Albanian State frontier, extending continuously until it reached the Adriatic Sea.
Only Montenegro and Albania contain territory that was formerly part of the Zeta Banovina.
Answer: False
Explanation: The territory that once belonged to the Zeta Banovina is now distributed among Montenegro, Kosovo, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Serbia, and Croatia, in addition to Albania.
The Zeta Banovina encompassed the entire territory of present-day Montenegro, along with adjacent areas now part of Central Serbia, Croatia, Kosovo, and Bosnia and Herzegovina.
Answer: True
Explanation: The Zeta Banovina encompassed the entire territory of present-day Montenegro, along with adjacent areas that are now part of Central Serbia, Croatia, Kosovo, and Bosnia and Herzegovina.
The 1931 census reported the Zeta Banovina had a population of 925,516 inhabitants and an area of 30,997 square kilometers.
Answer: True
Explanation: Based on the 1931 census, the Zeta Banovina had a population of 925,516 inhabitants and covered an area of 30,997 square kilometers.
The 1931 Constitution defined the northern boundaries of the Zeta Banovina by the southern boundaries of the Littoral and Drina Banovinas, extending to the intersection of Dragačevo, Žiča, and Studenica districts.
Answer: True
Explanation: According to the 1931 Constitution of the Kingdom of Yugoslavia, the northern boundaries of the Zeta Banovina were determined by the southern boundaries of the Littoral and Drina Banovinas, extending to the intersection point of the Dragačevo, Žiča, and Studenica districts.
The eastern boundary of the Zeta Banovina followed the eastern boundaries of the Studenica, Deževa, Mitrovica, Drenica, and Drin districts, including them within the banovina's territory.
Answer: True
Explanation: From the intersection of the Dragačevo, Žiča, and Studenica districts, the eastern boundary of the Zeta Banovina followed the eastern boundaries of the Studenica, Deževa, Mitrovica, Drenica, and Drin districts, with all these districts being included within the banovina's territory.
The southern and western boundary of the Zeta Banovina coincided with the Yugoslav-Albanian State frontier, extending to the Adriatic Sea.
Answer: True
Explanation: The southern and western boundary of the Zeta Banovina coincided with the Yugoslav-Albanian State frontier, extending continuously until it reached the Adriatic Sea.
Modern-day Montenegro, Kosovo, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Serbia, and Croatia all include territory that was once part of the Zeta Banovina.
Answer: True
Explanation: The territory that once belonged to the Zeta Banovina is now distributed among several modern-day countries: Montenegro, Kosovo, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Serbia, and Croatia.
Which modern-day country's entire territory was encompassed by the Zeta Banovina?
Answer: Montenegro.
According to the 1931 census, what was the approximate population of the Zeta Banovina?
Answer: 925,516 inhabitants.
According to the 1931 Constitution, the northern boundaries of the Zeta Banovina extended to the intersection point of which three districts?
Answer: Dragačevo, Žiča, and Studenica.
Which of the following modern-day countries does NOT include territory that was once part of the Zeta Banovina?
Answer: Slovenia.
What was the area of the Zeta Banovina in square kilometers, according to the 1931 census?
Answer: 30,997 sq km.
The southern and western boundary of the Zeta Banovina was defined by its coincidence with which international border?
Answer: The Yugoslav-Albanian State frontier.
Which of the following districts was NOT mentioned as part of the eastern boundary delineation of the Zeta Banovina?
Answer: Morava.
What was the approximate area of the Zeta Banovina in square miles, according to the 1931 census?
Answer: 11,968 square miles.
The eastern boundary of the Zeta Banovina included which of the following districts?
Answer: Studenica.
Podgorica served as the capital of the Zeta Banovina throughout its entire existence.
Answer: False
Explanation: Cetinje, a city with historical significance, was designated as the capital of the Zeta Banovina, not Podgorica.
The Zeta Banovina was characterized as a centralized, directly governed province with no degree of self-governance.
Answer: False
Explanation: The Zeta Banovina was a devolved autonomous banate, indicating a regional administrative unit with a degree of self-governance under the central authority of the Kingdom of Yugoslavia.
Belgrade and Zagreb were listed as major cities within the Zeta Banovina.
Answer: False
Explanation: Belgrade and Zagreb were not listed among the cities and towns that were part of the Zeta Banovina.
The 'Ban' was a ceremonial title with no real administrative power in the Zeta Banovina.
Answer: False
Explanation: The 'Ban' was the chief administrator or governor of the Zeta Banovina, overseeing its devolved autonomous governance, indicating significant administrative power.
Cetinje, a city with historical significance, was designated as the capital of the Zeta Banovina.
Answer: True
Explanation: Cetinje, a city with historical significance in the region, was designated as the capital of the Zeta Banovina.
The Zeta Banovina was a devolved autonomous banate, indicating a degree of self-governance under the central authority of the Kingdom of Yugoslavia.
Answer: True
Explanation: The Zeta Banovina was characterized as a devolved autonomous banate, indicating a regional administrative unit with a degree of self-governance under the central authority of the Kingdom of Yugoslavia.
What type of government structure best describes the Zeta Banovina?
Answer: A devolved autonomous banate.
Which of the following cities was NOT listed as part of the Zeta Banovina at some point during its existence?
Answer: Belgrade.
What was the role of the 'Ban' in the Zeta Banovina?
Answer: The chief administrator or governor.
The Zeta Banovina ceased to exist due to internal political reforms within Yugoslavia in 1939.
Answer: False
Explanation: The Zeta Banovina ceased to exist following the Invasion of Yugoslavia on April 17, 1941, not due to internal political reforms in 1939.
In 1939, the entire coastal region of the Zeta Banovina, including its capital Cetinje, was transferred to the Banovina of Croatia.
Answer: False
Explanation: In 1939, predominantly Catholic areas from Konavle to Pelješac, including Dubrovnik, were merged into the Banovina of Croatia, not the entire coastal region or Cetinje.
Following the 1941 Axis occupation, the entire remaining territory of the Zeta Banovina was annexed solely by Fascist Italy.
Answer: False
Explanation: After the Axis occupation in 1941, only a small portion around the Gulf of Kotor was annexed by Fascist Italy, while other parts were incorporated into Italian-occupied Montenegro and Albania, German-occupied Serbia, and the Independent State of Croatia.
After World War II, the entire territory of the former Zeta Banovina was unified into a single Socialist Republic of Montenegro.
Answer: False
Explanation: After World War II, the territory of the former Zeta Banovina was divided and integrated into the federal Socialist Yugoslavia, becoming parts of Montenegro, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Serbia, and Croatia.
Dubrovnik remained an independent city-state throughout the existence of the Zeta Banovina.
Answer: False
Explanation: Dubrovnik was initially part of the Zeta Banovina but was later merged with the new Banovina of Croatia in 1939.
The Gulf of Kotor region became part of German-occupied Serbia after the 1941 invasion.
Answer: False
Explanation: During the World War II occupation in 1941, a small area around the Gulf of Kotor was specifically annexed by Fascist Italy, not German-occupied Serbia.
The Invasion of Yugoslavia on April 17, 1941, marked the dissolution of the Zeta Banovina.
Answer: True
Explanation: The Zeta Banovina ceased to exist following the Invasion of Yugoslavia on April 17, 1941, which marked the beginning of World War II occupation in the region.
In 1939, predominantly Catholic areas from Konavle to Pelješac, including Dubrovnik, were merged into the Banovina of Croatia from the Zeta Banovina.
Answer: True
Explanation: In 1939, predominantly Catholic areas of the Zeta Banovina, specifically from Konavle to Pelješac and including the city of Dubrovnik, were merged into the newly established Banovina of Croatia.
After Axis occupation in 1941, a portion around the Gulf of Kotor was annexed by Fascist Italy, while other parts were incorporated into Italian-occupied Montenegro and Albania, German-occupied Serbia, and the Independent State of Croatia.
Answer: True
Explanation: After the Axis Powers occupied the remaining area of the Zeta Banovina in 1941, a small portion around the Gulf of Kotor was annexed by Fascist Italy. Much of the rest was incorporated into Italian-occupied Montenegro and Albania, while eastern areas became part of German-occupied Serbia, and western areas were included in the Independent State of Croatia.
After World War II, the territory of the former Zeta Banovina was divided and integrated into the federal Socialist Yugoslavia, becoming parts of Montenegro, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Serbia, and Croatia.
Answer: True
Explanation: Following World War II, the territory that once comprised the Zeta Banovina was divided and integrated into the federal Socialist Yugoslavia, specifically becoming parts of Montenegro, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Serbia, and Croatia.
What event directly led to the dissolution of the Zeta Banovina?
Answer: The Invasion of Yugoslavia on April 17, 1941.
Which of the following areas was merged from the Zeta Banovina into the newly established Banovina of Croatia in 1939?
Answer: Predominantly Catholic areas from Konavle to Pelješac, including Dubrovnik.
After the Axis occupation in 1941, what happened to a small portion of the Zeta Banovina around the Gulf of Kotor?
Answer: It was annexed by Fascist Italy.
How was the territory of the former Zeta Banovina reorganized after World War II?
Answer: It was divided and integrated into federal Socialist Yugoslavia, becoming parts of Montenegro, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Serbia, and Croatia.
Which of the following was NOT a modern-day country that received territory from the former Zeta Banovina after World War II?
Answer: Slovenia.
Which of the following cities was part of the Zeta Banovina until 1939?
Answer: Dubrovnik.
What was the primary reason for the dissolution of the Zeta Banovina?
Answer: The Invasion of Yugoslavia.
After the Axis occupation in 1941, much of the remaining Zeta Banovina was incorporated into which two Italian-occupied territories?
Answer: Italian-occupied Montenegro and Albania.
Uroš Krulj was the first Ban of Zeta, serving from 1929 to 1931.
Answer: False
Explanation: Krsta Smiljanić was the first Ban of Zeta, serving from October 9, 1929, to January 10, 1931. Uroš Krulj succeeded him as the second Ban.
Krsta Smiljanić was affiliated with the Yugoslav Radical Union and served under Peter II of Yugoslavia.
Answer: False
Explanation: Krsta Smiljanić was affiliated with the Military and served as Ban under the reign of Alexander I of Yugoslavia.
Aleksa Stanišić immediately succeeded Krsta Smiljanić as Ban of Zeta.
Answer: False
Explanation: Uroš Krulj succeeded Krsta Smiljanić as the second Ban of Zeta. Aleksa Stanišić was the third Ban.
Uroš Krulj served from 1932 to 1934 and was affiliated with the Yugoslav Radical Union.
Answer: False
Explanation: Uroš Krulj served from January 10, 1931, to July 3, 1932, and was affiliated with the Yugoslav Radical Peasants' Democracy (JRSD).
Aleksa Stanišić was the fourth Ban of Zeta, born in Trebinje.
Answer: False
Explanation: Aleksa Stanišić was the third Ban of Zeta, born in Prijepolje. Petar Ivanišević was the fifth Ban, born in Trebinje.
Aleksa Stanišić served from 1934 to 1936 and was affiliated with the Military.
Answer: False
Explanation: Aleksa Stanišić served from July 3, 1932, to April 23, 1934, and was affiliated with the Yugoslav Radical Peasants' Democracy (JRSD).
Petar Ivanišević became Ban after Aleksa Stanišić, serving under King Alexander I.
Answer: False
Explanation: Mujo Sočica became the fourth Ban of Zeta after Aleksa Stanišić, serving under Prince Paul of Yugoslavia. Petar Ivanišević was the fifth Ban.
Mujo Sočica served from 1931 to 1932 and was affiliated with the Yugoslav Radical Peasants' Democracy.
Answer: False
Explanation: Mujo Sočica served from April 23, 1934, to August 13, 1936, and was affiliated with the Yugoslav Radical Union (JRZ).
Petar Ivanišević was the sixth Ban of Zeta, born in Jagodina.
Answer: False
Explanation: Petar Ivanišević was the fifth Ban of Zeta, born in Trebinje. Božidar Krstić was the sixth Ban, born in Jagodina.
Petar Ivanišević served from 1934 to 1936 and was affiliated with the Military.
Answer: False
Explanation: Petar Ivanišević served from August 13, 1936, to May 25, 1939, and was affiliated with the Yugoslav Radical Union (JRZ).
Božidar Krstić was the fifth Ban of Zeta, serving for over three years.
Answer: False
Explanation: Božidar Krstić was the sixth Ban of Zeta, serving for 1 year and 306 days, not over three years.
Božidar Krstić was affiliated with the Military and was born in Plužine.
Answer: False
Explanation: Božidar Krstić was affiliated with the Yugoslav Radical Union (JRZ) and was born in Jagodina.
Blažo Đukanović was the last Ban of Zeta, serving for over a year until 1941.
Answer: False
Explanation: Blažo Đukanović was the last Ban of Zeta, but his term was notably brief, lasting only 21 days from April 1 to April 17, 1941.
Blažo Đukanović was affiliated with the Yugoslav Radical Union and served under Alexander I.
Answer: False
Explanation: Blažo Đukanović was affiliated with the Military and served as Ban under the monarch Peter II of Yugoslavia.
Uroš Krulj and Mujo Sočica were the two Bans of Zeta affiliated with the Military.
Answer: False
Explanation: Krsta Smiljanić and Blažo Đukanović were the two Bans of Zeta affiliated with the Military. Uroš Krulj was affiliated with JRSD and Mujo Sočica with JRZ.
Petar Ivanišević and Božidar Krstić were affiliated with the Yugoslav Radical Peasants' Democracy (JRSD).
Answer: False
Explanation: Petar Ivanišević and Božidar Krstić were affiliated with the Yugoslav Radical Union (JRZ). Uroš Krulj and Aleksa Stanišić were affiliated with the JRSD.
Krsta Smiljanić, Uroš Krulj, and Blažo Đukanović were affiliated with the Yugoslav Radical Union (JRZ).
Answer: False
Explanation: Krsta Smiljanić and Blažo Đukanović were affiliated with the Military. Uroš Krulj was affiliated with the Yugoslav Radical Peasants' Democracy (JRSD). Mujo Sočica, Petar Ivanišević, and Božidar Krstić were affiliated with the Yugoslav Radical Union (JRZ).
Mujo Sočica served the longest term as Ban of Zeta, exceeding three years.
Answer: False
Explanation: The longest term served by a Ban of Zeta was 2 years and 285 days, held by Petar Ivanišević. Mujo Sočica served for 2 years and 112 days.
Božidar Krstić was born in Ljubiš.
Answer: False
Explanation: Božidar Krstić was born in Jagodina. Krsta Smiljanić was born in Ljubiš.
Krsta Smiljanić was the first Ban of Zeta, serving from October 9, 1929, to January 10, 1931.
Answer: True
Explanation: The first Ban of Zeta was Krsta Smiljanić, who served from October 9, 1929, to January 10, 1931, a term lasting 1 year and 93 days.
Krsta Smiljanić, the first Ban of Zeta, was affiliated with which group?
Answer: The Military.
Uroš Krulj, the second Ban of Zeta, was affiliated with which political party?
Answer: Yugoslav Radical Peasants' Democracy (JRSD).
Aleksa Stanišić, the third Ban of Zeta, was born in which city, now part of Serbia?
Answer: Prijepolje.
Mujo Sočica served as Ban of Zeta under which monarch or regent?
Answer: Prince Paul of Yugoslavia (as regent).
What was the political affiliation of Mujo Sočica, the fourth Ban of Zeta?
Answer: Yugoslav Radical Union (JRZ).
Petar Ivanišević, the fifth Ban of Zeta, was born in which city, now part of Bosnia and Herzegovina?
Answer: Trebinje.
What was the longest term served by any Ban of Zeta?
Answer: Petar Ivanišević, 2 years and 285 days.
Božidar Krstić, the sixth Ban of Zeta, was born in which city, now located in Serbia?
Answer: Jagodina.
Which two Bans of Zeta were affiliated with the Military?
Answer: Krsta Smiljanić and Blažo Đukanović.
Which three Bans of Zeta were affiliated with the Yugoslav Radical Union (JRZ)?
Answer: Mujo Sočica, Petar Ivanišević, and Božidar Krstić.
Under which monarch did Krsta Smiljanić, the first Ban of Zeta, serve?
Answer: Alexander I.
What was the duration of Uroš Krulj's term as Ban of Zeta?
Answer: 1 year and 176 days.
Mujo Sočica's term as Ban of Zeta lasted for how many days?
Answer: 2 years and 112 days.
Petar Ivanišević's term as Ban of Zeta lasted for how many days?
Answer: 2 years and 285 days.
Which of the following was NOT a political affiliation of any Ban of Zeta mentioned in the source?
Answer: Communist Party of Yugoslavia.
Which of the following cities was the birthplace of Aleksa Stanišić?
Answer: Prijepolje.
Which of the following cities was the birthplace of Petar Ivanišević?
Answer: Trebinje.
Which of the following cities was the birthplace of Božidar Krstić?
Answer: Jagodina.
Which of the following was NOT a political affiliation of a Ban of Zeta?
Answer: Socialist Party.
The Zeta Banovina was named after a prominent mountain range that ran through its territory.
Answer: False
Explanation: The province was named after the Zeta River, which also gave its name to a medieval state, not a mountain range.
The source material provides a unique flag specifically designed for the Zetska Banovina, distinct from the Kingdom of Yugoslavia's flag.
Answer: False
Explanation: The flag of Zetska Banovina, as represented in the source material, is specifically identified as the Flag of the Kingdom of Yugoslavia, not a unique design.
The source material depicts a unique coat of arms for the Zetska Banovina, separate from the Kingdom of Yugoslavia's emblem.
Answer: False
Explanation: The coat of arms of Zetska Banovina, as depicted in the source material, is specifically identified as the Coat of arms of the Kingdom of Yugoslavia, not a separate emblem.
The source material includes a map showing the Zeta Banovina as an island nation separate from the main Yugoslav territory.
Answer: False
Explanation: The locator map visually represents the Zeta Banovina in red, situated within the larger territory of the Kingdom of Yugoslavia, which is depicted in light yellow, indicating it was not an island nation.
The official name of the Zeta Banovina was primarily in Montenegrin, with Serbo-Croatian as a secondary translation.
Answer: False
Explanation: The primary language used for the official name of the Zeta Banovina was Serbo-Croatian, appearing as Zetska banovina in Latin script and Zetska banovina in Cyrillic script.
The province of Zeta Banovina was named after the Zeta River, which also gave its name to a medieval state.
Answer: True
Explanation: The province was named after the Zeta River. This river also historically gave its name to the medieval state of Zeta, which roughly corresponded to the area of modern-day Montenegro.
From what geographical feature did the Zeta Banovina derive its name?
Answer: The Zeta River.
What was the primary language used for the official name of the Zeta Banovina?
Answer: Serbo-Croatian.
The flag of Zetska Banovina, as represented in the source material, was identified as which flag?
Answer: The Flag of the Kingdom of Yugoslavia.
What historical entity, existing from 1919 to 1929, is mentioned in the 'See also' section as related to the Zeta Banovina?
Answer: The Zeta Oblast.
The Zeta Banovina was known in Serbo-Croatian by which of the following names?
Answer: Zetska banovina or Zetska banovina.
The coat of arms of Zetska Banovina, as depicted in the source, was specifically identified as which coat of arms?
Answer: The Coat of arms of the Kingdom of Yugoslavia.
The locator map in the source visually represents the Zeta Banovina in what color within the Kingdom of Yugoslavia?
Answer: Red.