What is the informal name for the First Agreement of Principles Governing the Normalisation of Relations?

The First Agreement of Principles Governing the Normalisation of Relations is informally known as the Brussels Agreement. In Serbian, it is called Briselski sporazum, and in Albanian, it is referred to as Marrëveshja e Brukselit.

What was the primary objective of the 2013 Brussels Agreement?

The primary objective of the 2013 Brussels Agreement was to normalize relations between the governments of Serbia and Kosovo. This agreement was negotiated and concluded under the auspices of the European Union.

When and where was the Brussels Agreement signed?

The Brussels Agreement was signed on April 19, 2013, in Brussels, Belgium. The agreement was the result of negotiations held under the mediation of the European Union.

What was Serbia's official stance on Kosovo's sovereignty at the time of the agreement?

At the time of the agreement, the government of Serbia did not recognize Kosovo as a sovereign state. However, Serbia began normalizing relations with the government of Kosovo as a consequence of signing the agreement.

How was the Brussels Agreement received by protestors in Belgrade?

In Belgrade, the Brussels Agreement faced criticism from protestors who viewed it as a validation or convalidation of Kosovo's independence. This indicates a segment of the Serbian population disagreed with the normalization process.

What historical events preceded the 2013 Brussels Agreement regarding Kosovo's status?

Following the Kosovo War and the 1999 NATO bombing of Yugoslavia, Kosovo, then part of Serbia and the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia, was placed under United Nations administration. Kosovo unilaterally declared independence in 2008, an action not recognized by Serbia, which maintains Kosovo is part of its territory.

Under which UN Security Council resolution was Kosovo administered prior to its declaration of independence?

Prior to Kosovo's unilateral declaration of independence in 2008, it was placed under United Nations administration under UNSC Resolution 1244. This resolution governed the interim administration of Kosovo following the 1999 conflict.

When did the EU-mediated dialogue between Kosovo and Serbia commence?

The European Union-mediated dialogue between Kosovo and Serbia began in March 2011. This dialogue aimed to address issues related to the normalization of relations between the two entities.

Was Serbia obligated to recognize Kosovo's independence during the EU-mediated dialogue?

No, Serbia was not obliged to recognize Kosovo's independence during the EU-mediated dialogue process. The agreement focused on normalizing relations rather than immediate recognition.

How many rounds of talks were held at the European External Action Service office in Brussels for the agreement?

Ten rounds of talks were held at the European External Action Service office in Brussels leading up to the agreement. These discussions spanned two years under the initial chairing of Catherine Ashton.

Who succeeded Catherine Ashton as the EU mediator for the Kosovo-Serbia dialogue?

Federica Mogherini succeeded Catherine Ashton as the EU mediator for the Kosovo-Serbia dialogue. She continued the process after Ashton's tenure.

What were the implications of the Brussels Agreement for Serbia's relationship with the European Union?

The Brussels Agreement significantly advanced Serbia's path towards European Union membership. It brought Serbia closer to opening EU accession talks, a key step in its integration process.

What was the implication of the Brussels Agreement for Kosovo's relationship with the European Union?

For Kosovo, the Brussels Agreement paved the way for initializing a Stabilisation and Association Agreement (SAA) with the European Union. This SAA was later signed in October 2015.

What role did United States diplomats play in the EU-led dialogue between Serbia and Kosovo?

United States diplomats actively supported the EU-led dialogue. U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton encouraged Baroness Ashton to travel in the Balkans, and they conducted joint visits to Belgrade, Pristina, and Sarajevo in October 2012.

Which international organizations supported the 2013 Brussels Agreement?

The 2013 Brussels Agreement was supported by several major international organizations, including the European Union, NATO, the OSCE (Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe), and the United Nations.

How long was the main document of the Brussels Agreement?

The main document of the Brussels Agreement was two pages long and contained 15 paragraphs detailing the principles for normalizing relations.

What did paragraphs 1-6 of the Brussels Agreement primarily address?

Paragraphs 1 through 6 of the Brussels Agreement focused on the establishment, scope, and functions of the planned Community of Serb Municipalities. This community is intended to provide a framework for self-governance for Serb-majority areas in Kosovo.

What provisions did the Brussels Agreement make regarding police and security in Kosovo?

The agreement stipulated the establishment of a single police force for all of Kosovo, including the northern regions, known as the Kosovo Police. This aimed to integrate security structures across the territory.

What did the Brussels Agreement stipulate concerning municipal elections?

The agreement stipulated that municipal elections would be held throughout Kosovo under Kosovo law. This was a key step towards integrating the administration of all municipalities.

What commitment was made in Paragraph 12 of the Brussels Agreement?

Paragraph 12 of the Brussels Agreement committed the parties to the creation of an implementation plan and specified a date by which this plan was to be concluded, although that date has since passed.

What was the undertaking mentioned in Paragraph 13 of the agreement?

Paragraph 13 of the agreement involved an undertaking to intensify discussions on energy and telecommunications matters between Serbia and Kosovo. These are crucial sectors for the functioning of daily life and infrastructure.

What did Paragraph 14 of the Brussels Agreement state regarding EU integration paths?

Paragraph 14 stated that neither side would block, nor encourage others to block, the other side's progress in their respective European Union paths. This clause aimed to prevent obstruction of EU accession or association processes.

What was envisioned in Paragraph 15 of the Brussels Agreement?

Paragraph 15 envisaged the establishment of an implementation committee, with facilitation provided by the European Union. This committee would oversee the execution of the agreement's provisions.

What specific guarantees were provided for Kosovo Serbs regarding the judicial system under the agreement?

The agreement guaranteed that all judicial matters would fall under Kosovo law, but with specific provisions for Kosovo Serbs. These included ensuring Kosovo Serbs formed a majority on certain judicial panels and that a panel, the Mitrovica District Court, must sit in North Mitrovica.

What specific guarantees were provided for Kosovo Serbs regarding policing under the agreement?

Regarding policing, the agreement stipulated that all police operations would be conducted by the Kosovo Police. However, it also specified that the regional commander for Serb-majority areas must be a Kosovo Serb chosen from a list provided by Kosovo Serb municipalities.

What key agreements were reached in February and August 2015 following the initial Brussels Agreement?

Following the initial agreement, a judicial agreement was reached in February 2015. Subsequently, agreements on energy and telecommunications operators were made, and on August 25, 2015, an agreement was concluded to establish the Association of Serbian Communities.

What concerns arose regarding the 2013 local-government elections in Kosovo in relation to the Brussels Agreement?

Concerns arose about how the 2013 local-government elections in Kosovo would be administered, particularly regarding ballot papers. The Serbian government objected to any mention of 'the state of Kosovo' on these papers.

How did the Serbian government address the issue of ballot papers for the 2013 elections in Kosovo?

Despite objections to the wording on ballot papers, the Serbian government agreed to encourage Serbs residing in northern Kosovo to participate in the local elections. This decision was part of the implementation process following the Brussels Agreement.

What arrangement was made in October 2013 concerning Serbian officials and North Kosovo?

In October 2013, arrangements were made that allowed Serbian officials to visit North Kosovo. This was part of the ongoing implementation and dialogue process.

What agreement was reached regarding electoral bodies in Kosovo and the international dialing code?

It was agreed that electoral bodies in Kosovo would include Kosovo Serb representatives. Additionally, the international dialing code +383 would be assigned to Kosovo, which was implemented in December 2016 after some delay.

What criticism did scholars Smilja Avramov and Elena Guskova level against the Brussels Agreement?

Scholars Smilja Avramov and Elena Guskova maintained that the Brussels Agreement violated Serbia's Constitution and the United Nations Charter. They also argued that it constituted an indirect recognition of Kosovo's independence.

How did the Assembly of Kosovo treat the Brussels Agreement?

The Assembly of Kosovo ratified the Brussels Agreement, incorporated it into law, and officially treats it as an international agreement. This contrasts with Serbia's approach to the agreement.

How did the National Assembly of Serbia handle the Brussels Agreement compared to Kosovo's assembly?

Unlike Kosovo's Assembly, the National Assembly of Serbia did not treat the Brussels Agreement as an international agreement requiring formal ratification according to Serbian procedure. However, it did accept the government's report on the dialogue process and the implementation of agreements.

What was the stance of the constitutional court in Belgrade regarding the constitutionality of the Brussels Agreement?

The constitutional court in Belgrade declined to rule on the constitutionality of the Brussels Agreement. In December 2014, it stated that the issue was a political question rather than a legal one, thus avoiding a definitive judgment.

What did Serbian President Aleksandar Vučić state about the Brussels Agreement in 2018?

In 2018, Serbian President Aleksandar Vučić described the Brussels Agreement as a difficult compromise for Serbia. He also stated that Serbia had met all of its obligations under the agreement.

What did Serbian President Aleksandar Vučić claim about the Brussels Agreement in March 2022?

On March 24, 2022, Serbian President Aleksandar Vučić claimed that the Brussels Agreement 'no longer exists'. He cited specific actions by Kosovo authorities as the primary reasons for this assertion.

What specific actions did President Vučić cite as reasons for the Brussels Agreement no longer existing?

President Vučić cited the suspension of the court president of Mitrovica, Ljiljana Stevanović, by the Kosovo Judicial Council, and alleged plans to remove all Serb commanders from the Kosovo police force as the primary reasons for his statement that the agreement was defunct.

What similar remarks were made by Serbian Prime Minister Ana Brnabić regarding the agreement and the Serb community?

Serbian Prime Minister Ana Brnabić made similar remarks to President Vučić, suggesting the Brussels Agreement was effectively dead. She also claimed that the basic human rights of the Serb community in Kosovo were not being respected.

What is the significance of the 'Community of Serb Municipalities' mentioned in the agreement?

The Community of Serb Municipalities is a key component of the Brussels Agreement, outlined in its initial paragraphs. It is intended to provide a form of self-governance for municipalities in Kosovo with a Serb majority, ensuring greater autonomy and representation for the Serb community.

What does the term 'normalization of relations' imply in the context of the Brussels Agreement?

In the context of the Brussels Agreement, 'normalization of relations' refers to the process of establishing functional, cooperative ties between Serbia and Kosovo, despite Serbia's non-recognition of Kosovo's independence. It involves practical arrangements covering areas like governance, security, and justice.

How did the EU facilitate the implementation of the Brussels Agreement?

The EU facilitated the implementation of the Brussels Agreement through various means, including chairing talks, mediating discussions, and establishing an implementation committee. The agreement itself stipulated EU facilitation for this committee.

What was the role of the European External Action Service (EEAS) in the talks?

The European External Action Service (EEAS) served as the venue for the ten rounds of talks leading to the Brussels Agreement. Its office in Brussels hosted the negotiations, chaired initially by Catherine Ashton.

What is the relationship between the Brussels Agreement and Kosovo's pursuit of EU membership?

The Brussels Agreement is a crucial step for Kosovo in its pursuit of EU membership. Normalizing relations with neighboring states is a prerequisite for EU integration, and the agreement helped Kosovo move towards initializing a Stabilisation and Association Agreement (SAA).

What is the significance of the international dialing code +383 for Kosovo in relation to the agreement?

The assignment and implementation of the international dialing code +383 to Kosovo was an outcome agreed upon as part of the normalization process facilitated by the Brussels Agreement. This provided Kosovo with its own unique telephone code, a symbol of its functional sovereignty.

What does the term 'convalidation' refer to in the context of Belgrade protestors' reaction to the agreement?

When protestors in Belgrade referred to the Brussels Agreement as a 'convalidation' of Kosovo independence, they meant that the agreement served to validate or give official approval to Kosovo's declaration of independence. This implied that by normalizing relations, Serbia was implicitly acknowledging Kosovo's statehood.

What was the purpose of the 'Implementation Committee' established under the Brussels Agreement?

The Brussels Agreement envisaged the establishment of an implementation committee, with EU facilitation, to oversee and manage the execution of the agreement's provisions. This committee would ensure that the agreed-upon steps were being taken by both parties.

How did the agreement address the integration of Serb-majority municipalities in North Kosovo?

The agreement stipulated the integration of Serb-majority municipalities in North Kosovo into the Kosovar legal system. This integration was accompanied by specific guarantees to protect the interests and autonomy of the Serb population in these areas.

What was the outcome of the Serbian constitutional court's review of the Brussels Agreement?

The Serbian constitutional court did not provide a ruling on the constitutionality of the Brussels Agreement. It declared the matter to be a political question, not a legal one, in December 2014.

What is the Belgrade–Pristina Dialogue, and how does the Brussels Agreement relate to it?

The Belgrade–Pristina Dialogue is the overarching process of talks between Serbia and Kosovo, facilitated by the EU, aimed at normalizing their relations. The 2013 Brussels Agreement represents a significant milestone within this ongoing dialogue, codifying key principles for normalization.

2013 Brussels Agreement Wiki: The Brussels Accord: Normalizing Balkan Relations

Dive in with Flashcard Learning!

When you are ready...
🎮 Play the Wiki2Web Clarity Challenge Game🎮

Historical Context

Post-Conflict Landscape

Following the Kosovo War and the 1999 NATO bombing of Yugoslavia, Kosovo was placed under United Nations administration via UNSC Resolution 1244. Kosovo unilaterally declared independence in 2008, a move recognized by over 100 countries but not by Serbia, which maintains Kosovo as part of its territory.^[5] This unresolved status created a complex geopolitical situation in the Western Balkans.

The Dialogue Initiative

To address the normalization of relations, the European Union facilitated a dialogue between Kosovo and Serbia, commencing in March 2011. While Serbia was not obligated to recognize Kosovo during this process, the talks were crucial for both entities' aspirations towards EU membership. Serbia's path to EU accession and Kosovo's potential Stabilisation and Association Agreement (SAA) were closely linked to progress in these negotiations.

International Framework

The dialogue operated within the framework established by UN Security Council Resolution 1244. International actors, including the United States, actively supported the EU-led process. U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, for instance, made joint visits to the region with EU High Representative Catherine Ashton, underscoring the international community's engagement.

The Negotiation Process

EU-Facilitated Discussions

Ten rounds of high-level talks were conducted at the European External Action Service headquarters in Brussels. The negotiations were primarily mediated by EU High Representatives, initially Catherine Ashton for two years, followed by Federica Mogherini. These discussions were instrumental in shaping the eventual agreement.

European Integration Pathway

The normalization of relations was a key prerequisite for both Serbia and Kosovo in their respective integration processes with the European Union. The successful conclusion of the Brussels Agreement paved the way for Serbia to commence EU accession negotiations and for Kosovo to initial a Stabilisation and Association Agreement (SAA) with the EU, signed in October 2015.

Key Negotiators

The agreement was a direct result of intensive negotiations between the political leadership of Serbia and Kosovo. Serbian Prime Minister Ivica Dačić and Kosovo Prime Minister Hashim Thaçi were the principal signatories, representing their governments in these critical discussions mediated by the EU.

The Agreement's Core Tenets

Community of Serb Municipalities

A significant portion of the agreement (paragraphs 1-6) focused on establishing the Community of Serb Municipalities. This entity was envisioned to provide a framework for self-governance for Kosovo's Serb population, particularly in areas with a Serb majority. The agreement outlined its scope and functions, aiming to integrate Serb-majority municipalities within Kosovo's legal system while ensuring specific guarantees for the Serb community.

Policing and Judiciary

The agreement stipulated that policing across all of Kosovo would be unified under the Kosovo Police. Specific provisions were made for the north, including ensuring a majority of Kosovo Serbs within certain judicial panels and establishing a panel of the Mitrovica District Court in North Mitrovica. Additionally, the regional police commander for Serb-majority areas was to be a Kosovo Serb selected from a list provided by local municipalities.

Legal and Administrative Framework

Key administrative and legal points included the stipulation that municipal elections would be held throughout Kosovo under Kosovo law. An implementation plan was to be established, and discussions were to intensify regarding energy and telecommunications. Crucially, paragraph 14 stated that neither side would obstruct the other's progress in their respective EU integration paths.

Post-Agreement Developments

Ongoing Dialogue and Agreements

Following the 2013 accord, regular meetings continued to implement its provisions. Subsequent agreements were reached on critical issues such as energy, telecommunications, and the establishment of the Association of Serbian Communities in August 2015. The assignment of the international dialing code +383 to Kosovo was also a significant outcome, implemented in December 2016 after initial delays.

Electoral Participation

The administration of the 2013 local government elections in Kosovo was a point of contention, particularly regarding ballot paper wording. However, Serbia agreed to encourage its Serb population in northern Kosovo to participate, a move seen as a step towards integration and adherence to the agreement's spirit.

Implementation Challenges

Despite progress, the full implementation of certain aspects, particularly the establishment of the Community of Serb Municipalities, has faced significant challenges and political disputes over the years. Tensions have resurfaced periodically, impacting the ongoing normalization process.

Reactions and Critiques

Serbian Constitutional Concerns

In Serbia, the agreement faced criticism from some scholars, such as Smilja Avramov and Elena Guskova, who argued it violated the Serbian Constitution and the UN Charter. They contended that the agreement constituted an indirect recognition of Kosovo's independence. The Serbian National Assembly did not formally ratify it as an international treaty, though it accepted reports on the dialogue process.

Legal Interpretation

The constitutional court in Belgrade declined to rule on the agreement's constitutionality, deeming it a political rather than a legal matter. Meanwhile, the Assembly of Kosovo ratified the agreement, incorporating it into law and treating it as an international accord.

Evolving Stances

Serbian officials have described the agreement as a difficult compromise. In March 2022, Serbian President Aleksandar Vučić claimed the Brussels Agreement "no longer exists," citing actions by Kosovo authorities, such as the suspension of a court president and alleged plans to remove Serb commanders from the Kosovo police force. Prime Minister Ana Brnabić echoed these sentiments, stating that the agreement's core principles were not being respected.

Teacher's Corner

Edit and Print this course in the Wiki2Web Teacher Studio

Edit and Print Materials from this study in the wiki2web studio

Click here to open the "2013 Brussels Agreement" Wiki2Web Studio curriculum kit

Use the free Wiki2web Studio to generate printable flashcards, worksheets, exams, and export your materials as a web page or an interactive game.

True or False?

Test Your Knowledge!

Gamer's Corner

Are you ready for the Wiki2Web Clarity Challenge?

Learn about 2013_brussels_agreement while playing the wiki2web Clarity Challenge game.

Unlock the mystery image and prove your knowledge by earning trophies. This simple game is addictively fun and is a great way to learn!

Play now

Explore More Topics

Discover other topics to study!

list of russian mathematicians

joan c. edwards stadium

r ū ḥ

top500

References

A full list of references for this article are available at the 2013 Brussels Agreement Wikipedia page

Feedback & Support

To report an issue with this page, or to find out ways to support the mission, please click here.

Disclaimer

Important Notice

This document was generated by an Artificial Intelligence and is intended for informational and educational purposes only. The content is derived from publicly available data and may not reflect the most current developments or nuances of the subject matter.

This is not political or legal advice. The information provided herein is not a substitute for professional consultation regarding international relations, diplomacy, or legal matters. Always consult with qualified experts and refer to official sources for definitive information.

The creators of this page are not responsible for any errors or omissions, or for any actions taken based on the information provided.

The Brussels Accord

💡 Dive in with Flashcard Learning! 💡

Historical Context 🌍

🕊️ Post-Conflict Landscape

💬 The Dialogue Initiative

🇺🇳 International Framework

The Negotiation Process 🗣️

🏛️ EU-Facilitated Discussions

🇪🇺 European Integration Pathway

🤝 Key Negotiators

The Agreement's Core Tenets 📜

🏘️ Community of Serb Municipalities

👮 Policing and Judiciary

⚖️ Legal and Administrative Framework

Post-Agreement Developments ➡️

🗓️ Ongoing Dialogue and Agreements

🗳️ Electoral Participation

❓ Implementation Challenges

Reactions and Critiques 🤔

⚖️ Serbian Constitutional Concerns

🏛️ Legal Interpretation

🗣️ Evolving Stances

Teacher's Corner 🧑‍🏫

Edit and Print this course in the Wiki2Web Teacher Studio

True or False? 🤔

❓ Test Your Knowledge! ❓

Gamer's Corner 🎮

Are you ready for the Wiki2Web Clarity Challenge?

Explore More Topics

📜 Discover other topics to study!

References

📜 References

Feedback & Support 👍

To report an issue with this page, or to find out ways to support the mission, please click here.

Disclaimer ⚠️

📜 Important Notice

Dive in with Flashcard Learning!

Historical Context

Post-Conflict Landscape

The Dialogue Initiative

International Framework

The Negotiation Process

EU-Facilitated Discussions

European Integration Pathway

Key Negotiators

The Agreement's Core Tenets

Community of Serb Municipalities

Policing and Judiciary

Legal and Administrative Framework

Post-Agreement Developments

Ongoing Dialogue and Agreements

Electoral Participation

Implementation Challenges

Reactions and Critiques

Serbian Constitutional Concerns

Legal Interpretation

Evolving Stances

Teacher's Corner

True or False?

Test Your Knowledge!

Gamer's Corner

Discover other topics to study!

References

Feedback & Support

Disclaimer

Important Notice