Beyond job creation, what other objectives did the ARRA aim to achieve?

In addition to saving and creating jobs, the ARRA aimed to provide temporary relief programs for individuals most affected by the recession. It also focused on making investments in key areas such as infrastructure, education, health, and renewable energy to foster long-term economic benefits.

What was the estimated cost of the ARRA at the time of its passage, and how was it later revised?

The approximate cost of the economic stimulus package was initially estimated at $787 billion when it was passed. This figure was later revised, with estimates placing the total cost between $831 billion for the period of 2009 to 2019.

On what economic theory was the ARRA based?

The rationale behind the ARRA was rooted in Keynesian economic theory. This theory suggests that during economic downturns, government intervention through increased public spending can counteract the decrease in private spending, thereby saving jobs and preventing further economic decline.

What was the political reception of the ARRA, particularly from Republicans?

The politics surrounding the ARRA were highly contentious. Republicans criticized the size of the stimulus package, and not a single Republican member of the House voted for it, while only three Republican senators supported it. The opposition from Republicans may have contributed to the Tea Party movement and the Republican gains in the 2010 midterm elections.

What is the general consensus among economists regarding the ARRA's effectiveness?

Most economists agree that the stimulus package was smaller than what might have been needed to fully address the recession. However, surveys indicate overwhelming agreement that the ARRA did reduce unemployment and that its benefits ultimately outweighed its costs.

Who primarily drafted the House and Senate versions of the ARRA?

The House and Senate versions of the bill were largely developed by Democratic congressional committee leaders and their staff. Aides to President-Elect Obama also held numerous meetings with these leaders and staffers as the bill was being formulated before Obama officially took office.

What was the legislative history of the ARRA in the House of Representatives?

The House version of the bill, H.R. 1, was introduced on January 26, 2009, by Dave Obey. The House passed the bill on January 28, 2009, with a vote of 244-188. This swift passage was facilitated by combining numerous proposed amendments into fewer floor votes.

What was the legislative history of the ARRA in the Senate?

The Senate introduced its version of the bill as S. 1 on January 6, 2009. It was later substituted into the House bill. The Senate began debate on the bill in early February 2009, eventually voting to advance it on February 9 and passing it on February 10, 2009, with a vote of 61-37.

What significant difference existed between the House and Senate versions of the ARRA?

A notable difference was the Senate's inclusion of a one-year extension for revisions to the alternative minimum tax, which added approximately $70 billion to the bill's total cost compared to the House version.

What was the final outcome of the legislative process for the ARRA?

After passing both the House and Senate in different forms, a Conference Report was completed on February 11, 2009. The House agreed to the report on February 13, 2009 (246-183), followed by the Senate (60-38). President Barack Obama signed the bill into law on February 17, 2009.

How was the ARRA's funding allocated among its main components?

The Act specified that approximately 37% of its total funding, amounting to $288 billion, was dedicated to tax incentives. Another 18%, or $144 billion, was allocated to state and local fiscal relief, with over 90% of that aid directed towards Medicaid and education. The remaining 45%, totaling $357 billion, was designated for federal spending programs.

What were the main categories of federal spending programs funded by the ARRA?

The federal spending programs funded by the ARRA included investments in transportation, communication, wastewater, and sewer infrastructure improvements. It also funded energy efficiency upgrades in private and federal buildings, extended federal unemployment benefits, and supported scientific research programs.

What was the total amount allocated for tax incentives for individuals under the ARRA?

The ARRA allocated $237 billion towards tax incentives for individuals. This included a new payroll tax credit, adjustments to the alternative minimum tax, expansions of the child tax credit and earned income tax credit, and credits for college tuition and home energy efficiency.

What specific tax incentive was provided for individuals related to their paychecks?

A new payroll tax credit was introduced, providing $400 per worker and $800 per couple for 2009 and 2010. This credit began phasing out for individuals earning over $75,000 and couples earning over $150,000.

How did the ARRA address the Alternative Minimum Tax (AMT)?

The ARRA included a provision for a one-year increase in the AMT floor to $70,950 for joint filers for the tax year 2009. This measure aimed to prevent a significant number of taxpayers from being subject to the AMT.

What changes were made to the child tax credit under the ARRA?

The ARRA expanded the child tax credit, allocating $15 billion to make the $1,000 credit accessible to more families, including those who did not owe federal income taxes. This expansion aimed to provide greater relief to low-income workers with children.

What was the homebuyer credit provision in the ARRA?

The Act provided an $8,000 refundable credit for all homes purchased between January 1, 2009, and December 1, 2009. Additionally, the repayment provision for this credit was repealed for homes purchased in 2009 and held for more than three years, specifically for first-time homebuyers.

What tax incentives were provided for companies under the ARRA?

The ARRA allocated $51 billion in tax incentives for companies. These included provisions allowing companies to use current losses to offset previous profits for tax refunds, extending tax credits for renewable energy production, and modifying bonus depreciation rules for businesses purchasing equipment.

How did the ARRA impact healthcare spending and policy?

The ARRA allocated $155.1 billion to healthcare, significantly boosting spending on Medicaid ($86.8 billion) to help states. It also invested $25.8 billion in health information technology (HITECH Act), provided subsidies for the unemployed to continue health insurance under COBRA ($25.1 billion), and funded health research and facility construction.

What was the HITECH Act, and how did it relate to the ARRA?

The Health Information Technology for Economic and Clinical Health (HITECH) Act was enacted as part of the ARRA. It aimed to promote the adoption and meaningful use of health information technology, allocating $25.8 billion for investments and incentive payments in this area.

What was the total allocation for education under the ARRA, and what were some key provisions?

The ARRA allocated approximately $100 billion to education. Key provisions included $53.6 billion in aid to local school districts to prevent layoffs, $15.6 billion to increase Pell Grants, and funding for special education (IDEA) and Head Start programs.

How did the ARRA aim to assist low-income workers, the unemployed, and retirees?

The Act provided $82.2 billion for aid in these areas. This included extending unemployment benefits, increasing them by $25 per week, enhancing the Food Stamp Program, providing one-time payments to Social Security and SSI recipients, and funding job training programs.

What was the total investment in infrastructure under the ARRA, and what were the major components?

The ARRA invested a total of $105.3 billion in infrastructure. The largest portion, $48.1 billion, was dedicated to transportation projects like highways, bridges, and rail. Other significant investments were made in water, sewage, environmental protection, and public lands.

How much funding was allocated for transportation infrastructure, and what specific projects were prioritized?

A total of $48.1 billion was allocated for transportation infrastructure. Priority was given to highway and bridge construction projects ($27.5 billion), intercity passenger rail and high-speed rail projects ($8 billion), and new equipment for public transportation projects ($6.9 billion).

What investments were made in water, sewage, environmental, and public lands projects through the ARRA?

The Act allocated $18 billion to these sectors. Funds were directed towards the Army Corps of Engineers for environmental restoration and flood protection, the EPA for wastewater and drinking water infrastructure improvements, hazardous waste cleanup at Superfund sites, and various projects for national parks, forests, and wildlife refuges.

How did the ARRA support energy infrastructure and efficiency initiatives?

The ARRA invested $21.5 billion in energy infrastructure, including $6 billion for cleanup of radioactive waste and $4.5 billion for modernizing the electrical grid and smart grid technology. It also allocated $27.2 billion for energy efficiency and renewable energy research and investment, such as weatherizing homes and supporting renewable energy loan guarantees.

What was the total funding allocated for housing programs under the ARRA?

The ARRA allocated $14.7 billion towards housing programs. These funds were designated for repairing and modernizing public housing, financing low-income housing construction, providing Section 8 rental assistance, and supporting the Neighborhood Stabilization Program to purchase and repair foreclosed properties.

What was the purpose of the 'Buy American' provision included in the ARRA?

The 'Buy American' provision required that iron, steel, and manufactured goods used in public building or public works projects funded by the stimulus package must be produced in the United States. This was a protectionist measure intended to support domestic industries.

How did the 'Buy American' provision impact international trade relations, particularly with Canada?

The 'Buy American' provision caused significant backlash in the Canadian business community, leading Canada to consider its own restrictions on U.S. bidders for city contracts. Eventually, the United States and Canada reached an agreement exempting Canadian companies from these provisions to avoid harming the Canadian economy.

What did economists like Martin Feldstein, Larry Summers, and Paul Krugman recommend regarding the ARRA?

Economists such as Martin Feldstein, Larry Summers, and Nobel laureates Joseph Stiglitz and Paul Krugman generally favored a larger economic stimulus than what was enacted. Feldstein expressed concern that the ARRA needed revision to more directly address consumer spending and unemployment, while Krugman felt the plan was too small and politically compromised.

What was the stance of economists who placed a full-page ad in The New York Times and Wall Street Journal opposing Obama's stimulus plan?

These economists, including Nobel laureates Edward C. Prescott, Vernon L. Smith, and James M. Buchanan, believed that policymakers should focus on reforms that remove impediments to work, saving, investment, and production. They argued that lower tax rates and reduced government burdens were the best fiscal policy tools for boosting growth, directly contradicting the stimulus approach.

What were the Congressional Budget Office's (CBO) initial projections for the ARRA's impact on GDP and employment?

The CBO initially projected that the ARRA would increase GDP by 1.4% to 3.8% by the end of 2009 and boost employment by 0.8 million to 2.3 million people by the end of 2009. These positive impacts were expected to continue, though gradually decrease, through 2011.

What did the CBO estimate regarding the ARRA's long-term impact on GDP and the federal budget deficit?

The CBO estimated that by 2019, the ARRA would lead to a net decrease in GDP of 0.1% to 0.3% due to 'crowding out' effects from increased national debt. It also projected that the Act would increase federal budget deficits by $787 billion over the 2009-2019 period.

What was the stated purpose of Recovery.gov, and what criticisms did it face?

Recovery.gov was created as the official website for the ARRA to provide unprecedented transparency, allowing taxpayers to track how the stimulus money was being spent. However, early criticisms noted that the site offered little detail beyond news releases and complex spreadsheets, contrasting with privately run sites that provided more accessible information.

What were some of the reported issues with the Recovery.gov website?

Reports emerged about errors on the Recovery.gov website, including claims of fund distribution to non-existent congressional districts. Additionally, a controversy arose from a Drudge Report allegation about USDA contracts for small quantities of food, which the USDA clarified was a misrepresentation of bulk purchasing data.

What did the CBO's final analysis in February 2015 conclude about the ARRA's effects?

The CBO's final analysis found that over six years, the ARRA boosted real GDP by an average of 1.7% to 9.2%, reduced the unemployment rate by 1.1 to 4.8 percentage points, and increased full-time equivalent employment-years by 2.1 million to 11.6 million. Total outlays for the program were $663 billion.

What was the Obama administration's justification for the discrepancy between projected and actual unemployment rates after the ARRA's passage?

Supporters of the ARRA argued that the actual recession was more severe than initially projected when the stimulus package was drafted. This greater severity, they contended, accounted for why the unemployment rate exceeded initial forecasts, even with the stimulus in place.

What role did Vice President Joe Biden and Earl Devaney play in the ARRA's oversight?

Vice President Biden led a high-level advisory body, the President's Economic Recovery Advisory Board, to oversee the stimulus's implementation. Earl Devaney, as Inspector General of the Department of the Interior, was appointed to head the Recovery Accountability and Transparency Board (RATB) to monitor fund allocation and prevent fraud and waste.

What was the outcome of Senator Orrin Hatch's investigation into green energy grants funded by the ARRA?

In May 2016, Senator Orrin Hatch launched an inquiry into the ARRA's grants for solar and green energy companies by sending questions to the IRS and Treasury Department. Such letters from senior senators often initiate formal congressional investigations.

What was Section 1603 of the Recovery Act, and what action was taken regarding a Spanish company that received funds?

Section 1603 provided cash grants to solar companies to encourage investment in solar technology, offering cash instead of tax credits for companies not yet profitable. In September 2015, the U.S. government requested a Spanish company return $1 million it had received under this program, which the company stated it complied with.

What did the CBO estimate about the ARRA's impact on GDP and employment in its February 4, 2009 report?

The CBO's February 4, 2009 report projected that while the stimulus would increase economic output and employment in the short run, the GDP would see a net decrease of 0.1% to 0.3% by 2019 compared to the baseline estimate, primarily due to increased national debt.

What did the National Association of Business Economists (NABE) project about the ARRA's impact?

A NABE survey indicated that 60.3% of economists projected the ARRA would have a modest impact on shortening the recession, while 29.4% anticipated little or no impact, and 10.3% predicted a strong impact. They identified physical infrastructure, expanded unemployment benefits, and personal tax cuts as the most effective components.

What did Moody's and IHS Global Insight estimate regarding job creation from the ARRA one year after its enactment?

One year after the ARRA's enactment, independent macroeconomic firms like Moody's and IHS Global Insight estimated that the stimulus had saved or created between 1.6 to 1.8 million jobs. They forecast a total impact of 2.5 million jobs saved by the time the stimulus measures were fully implemented.

What was the criticism leveled by Senators Tom Coburn and John McCain regarding ARRA projects?

In August 2010, Senators Coburn and McCain released a report highlighting 100 projects they deemed wasteful, totaling about $15 billion (less than 2% of the total stimulus). While acknowledging the stimulus had a positive economic effect, they criticized it for not maximizing job creation for the money spent.

What realization did President Obama have regarding 'shovel-ready' projects?

By 2010, President Obama acknowledged that the concept of 'shovel-ready' projects, which were intended to quickly generate jobs through infrastructure spending, was not as straightforward as initially believed. He stated, 'there's no such thing as shovel-ready projects,' reflecting the delays encountered in implementing many infrastructure initiatives.

What was the DCCC's 'Hypocrisy Hall of Fame' initiative?

The Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee (DCCC) created a 'Hypocrisy Hall of Fame' to list Republican Representatives who had voted against the ARRA but subsequently sought or took credit for ARRA-funded programs in their districts. As of September 2011, they had listed 128 House Republicans in this category.

What did the White House Council of Economic Advisers (CEA) estimate in July 2010 regarding the ARRA's job impact?

In July 2010, the CEA estimated that the ARRA had saved or created between 2.5 and 3.6 million jobs as of the second quarter of 2010. At that time, stimulus spending outlays totaled $257 billion, and tax cuts amounted to $223 billion.

What was the estimated cost per job created according to critics' calculations of the ARRA?

Using a direct mathematical calculation based on the total spending and estimated job creation, critics reported that the ARRA cost taxpayers between $185,000 to $278,000 per job created. However, this calculation did not account for the permanent infrastructure and other benefits resulting from the investments.

What did the CBO report in November 2011 regarding the ARRA's employment effects?

In November 2011, the CBO updated its reports, stating that the employment effects of the ARRA began to wane at the end of 2010 and continued to do so throughout 2011. Nevertheless, in the third quarter of 2011, the CBO estimated the Act had increased full-time equivalent jobs by 0.5 million to 3.3 million.

American Recovery And Reinvestment Act Of 2009 Wiki: The American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009: An In-Depth Analysis of Economic Intervention

Dive in with Flashcard Learning!

When you are ready...
🎮 Play the Wiki2Web Clarity Challenge Game🎮

Act Overview

Legislative Framework

The American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 (ARRA), colloquially known as the Recovery Act, was a comprehensive stimulus package enacted by the 111th United States Congress and signed into law by President Barack Obama in February 2009. It was developed as a federal statute in response to the Great Recession.

Primary Objectives

The principal objective of ARRA was to mitigate the economic downturn by saving existing jobs and creating new ones with utmost urgency. Secondary goals included providing temporary relief programs for individuals most affected by the recession and stimulating investment in critical sectors such as infrastructure, education, healthcare, and renewable energy.

Financial Scope and Rationale

The estimated cost of the stimulus package was approximately $787 billion at the time of its passage, later revised to $831 billion over the period of 2009 to 2019. The underlying economic rationale was rooted in Keynesian economic theory, advocating for increased government spending to counterbalance decreased private sector expenditure during economic downturns, thereby preserving employment and halting further economic deterioration.

Legislative Journey

Drafting and Introduction

The legislative process for ARRA commenced prior to President Obama's official inauguration. Key congressional leaders, in consultation with the President-elect's transition team, drafted the House version (H.R. 1) and the Senate version (S. 1). These bills were primarily authored by Democratic congressional committee leaders and their staff, reflecting the administration's priorities for economic stimulus.

Congressional Debate and Passage

The House passed its version on January 28, 2009, with bipartisan opposition, as no Republican members voted in favor. The Senate followed suit, passing its version on February 10, 2009, with only three Republican senators voting in support. Significant debate occurred regarding the bill's size, scope, and specific provisions, including amendments proposed by Republicans to increase tax cuts and reduce overall spending.

Conference and Enactment

A conference committee reconciled the differences between the House and Senate versions. The final Conference Report was agreed upon by both chambers in mid-February 2009. President Barack Obama signed the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 into law on February 17, 2009, marking a significant legislative achievement early in his term.

Key Provisions

Allocation Breakdown

The Act strategically allocated funds across several key areas, aiming for broad economic impact. Approximately 37% was designated for tax incentives, 18% for state and local fiscal relief, and the remaining 45% for federal spending programs. This distribution underscored a multi-faceted approach to economic stabilization and growth.

Infobox Summary

The legislative framework of ARRA was detailed in an accompanying infobox, summarizing its long title, acronyms, nicknames, enactment details, and codification. This provided a concise overview of the Act's formal attributes and legislative history.

American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009
Citations
Long title	An Act making supplemental appropriations for job preservation and creation, infrastructure investment, energy efficiency and science, assistance to the unemployed, State, and local fiscal stabilization, for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2009, and for other purposes.
Acronyms	ARRA
Nicknames	Recovery Act
Enacted by	111th United States Congress
Effective	February 17, 2009
Public law	111-5
Statutes at Large	123 Stat. 115
Codification
Acts amended	Energy Policy Act of 2005, Energy Policy Act of 1992, Public Utility Regulatory Policies Act of 1978, Public Utility Holding Company Act of 1935
Titles amended	16 U.S.C.: Conservation, 42 U.S.C.: Public Health and Social Welfare
U.S.C. sections amended	16 U.S.C. ch. 46 § 2601 et seq., 42 U.S.C. ch. 134 § 13201 et seq., 42 U.S.C. ch. 149 § 15801 et seq.

Statement of Purpose

Section 3 of ARRA articulated the fundamental intentions behind its creation, emphasizing:

Job preservation and creation to foster economic recovery.
Assistance for those most severely impacted by the recession.
Investments to enhance economic efficiency through scientific and health advancements.
Infrastructure improvements for long-term economic benefits.
Stabilization of state and local government budgets to prevent service reductions and tax increases.

Tax Incentives

For Individuals

ARRA introduced several tax incentives for individuals, totaling approximately $237 billion. These included payroll tax credits, adjustments to the Alternative Minimum Tax (AMT) floor, expansions of the child tax credit and college credit, a homebuyer credit, and provisions related to unemployment compensation and energy efficiency home improvements.

Payroll Tax Credit: $116 billion allocated for a credit of $400 per worker/$800 per couple in 2009-2010, with phase-outs for higher incomes.
Alternative Minimum Tax (AMT): $70 billion for a one-year increase in the AMT floor for joint filers in 2009.
Child Tax Credit Expansion: $15 billion to provide a $1,000 credit to more families, including those with low incomes.
College Credit Expansion: $14 billion for a $2,500 credit for tuition and expenses in 2009-2010.
Homebuyer Credit: $6.6 billion for an $8,000 refundable credit for homes purchased in 2009, with repayment provisions repealed for homes held over three years.
Unemployment Compensation: $4.7 billion to exclude the first $2,400 of unemployment benefits from taxation in 2009.
Earned Income Tax Credit: $4.7 billion to increase the credit for families with at least three children.
Home Energy Credit: $4.3 billion for energy efficiency improvements, allowing homeowners to recoup 30% of costs up to $1,500.
Sales Tax Deduction: $1.7 billion for the deduction of sales tax from car purchases.

For Companies

Corporate tax incentives amounted to approximately $51 billion. These measures were designed to encourage business investment and liquidity, including provisions for using current losses to offset past profits, extending tax credits for renewable energy production, and modifying rules for government contractors and financial institutions.

Loss Carryback: $15 billion to allow companies to use current losses to offset profits from the previous five years, facilitating tax refunds.
Renewable Energy Credits: $13 billion to extend tax credits for renewable energy production until 2014.
Government Contractors: $11 billion to repeal a law requiring government agencies to withhold 3% of payments to contractors.
Bank Credit Repeal: $7 billion to increase taxes on merged banks by repealing a provision allowing firms to use losses as tax credits.
Bonus Depreciation: $5 billion to extend accelerated depreciation for business equipment purchases.

Healthcare Investments

Health Information Technology

A significant component of ARRA was the Health Information Technology for Economic and Clinical Health (HITECH) Act. This legislation allocated $25.8 billion towards investments in health information technology, promoting the adoption and meaningful use of electronic health records (EHRs) to improve healthcare quality and efficiency.

State and Unemployed Support

The Act provided substantial support for state Medicaid programs, allocating $86.8 billion to help states manage their budgets and maintain healthcare services. Additionally, $25.1 billion was designated to subsidize health insurance premiums for the unemployed under the COBRA program, offering crucial support during economic hardship.

Research and Prevention

Further investments included $10 billion for National Institutes of Health (NIH) facilities and research, $2 billion for Community Health Centers, and $1 billion for prevention and wellness initiatives. These allocations aimed to bolster public health infrastructure and advance medical research.

Educational Funding

State Fiscal Stabilization

ARRA directed $53.6 billion through the State Fiscal Stabilization Fund to local school districts. This funding was intended to prevent teacher layoffs, maintain educational services, and support school modernization and repair efforts, thereby safeguarding the education sector during the recession.

Student Aid and Access

The Act significantly boosted student financial aid by increasing Pell Grants from $4,731 to $5,350, allocating $15.6 billion for this purpose. Additional funds were provided for low-income schoolchildren, special education (IDEA), Head Start programs, childcare services, and educational technology, totaling approximately $100 billion for the education sector.

Infrastructure Investment

Transportation Networks

A substantial portion of ARRA's infrastructure funding, totaling $48.1 billion, was dedicated to transportation projects. This included significant investments in highway and bridge construction, intercity passenger rail, high-speed rail initiatives, and improvements to public transportation systems and airports.

Environmental and Public Lands

The Act allocated $18 billion towards environmental infrastructure and public lands. Key investments included funding for the Army Corps of Engineers for environmental restoration, wastewater and drinking water infrastructure improvements managed by the EPA, and projects for national parks, forests, and hazardous waste cleanup.

Government Facilities

ARRA also directed $7.2 billion towards the repair and modernization of government facilities. This included significant funding for Defense Department facilities, military housing, federal buildings and courthouses, and improvements to facilities for the Coast Guard, National Guard, and other federal agencies.

Energy Sector Initiatives

Efficiency and Renewables

The Act channeled $27.2 billion into energy efficiency and renewable energy research and investment. This encompassed loan guarantees for renewable energy technologies, weatherization programs for homes, funding for carbon capture research, grants for energy efficiency initiatives, and support for advanced battery and electric vehicle technologies.

Grid Modernization

Significant funding, approximately $6 billion, was allocated to modernize the nation's electrical grid and develop smart grid technologies. Additionally, $6 billion was earmarked for loan guarantees for renewable energy and electric transmission projects, aiming to enhance energy reliability and sustainability.

Scientific Research Funding

Agency Investments

ARRA allocated $7.6 billion to various scientific research agencies. This included substantial funding for the National Science Foundation ($3 billion), the Department of Energy ($2 billion), NASA ($1 billion), and the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) ($600 million), supporting critical research and development activities.

Infrastructure and Instruments

Within these allocations, funds were designated for upgrading scientific facilities and acquiring new major scientific instruments. For instance, the National Institute of Standards and Technology received funding for building construction, energy efficiency upgrades, and solar panel installations, enhancing its research capabilities.

Housing and Community Development

Public and Affordable Housing

The Act provided $14.7 billion for housing initiatives. This included funding for repairing and modernizing public housing, increasing its energy efficiency, and providing tax credits for low-income housing construction. It also supported rental assistance programs to prevent homelessness and aid for Native American housing.

Neighborhood Stabilization

A key component was the Neighborhood Stabilization Program, which received $2 billion to enable state and local governments to purchase and repair vacant, foreclosed housing. This initiative aimed to revitalize distressed neighborhoods and mitigate the impact of the housing crisis.

Oversight and Accountability

Monitoring Mechanisms

To ensure transparency and accountability, ARRA established oversight mechanisms. Vice President Joe Biden played a key role, supported by the President's Economic Recovery Advisory Board and the Recovery Accountability and Transparency Board (RATB). These bodies were tasked with monitoring fund allocation and preventing fraud, waste, and loss.

Recovery.gov

The official website, Recovery.gov, was created to provide public access to information regarding the Act's implementation and spending. While initially facing challenges with data accuracy and accessibility, subsequent redesigns aimed to enhance transparency, allowing taxpayers to track the distribution of stimulus funds.

Independent Review

The Act included provisions for independent inspectors general and an advisory panel to oversee the administration of funds. These measures were crucial in maintaining public trust and ensuring that the stimulus investments were used effectively and responsibly, despite criticisms regarding the pace of project implementation and the overall impact on job creation.

Teacher's Corner

Edit and Print this course in the Wiki2Web Teacher Studio

Edit and Print Materials from this study in the wiki2web studio

Click here to open the "American Recovery And Reinvestment Act Of 2009" Wiki2Web Studio curriculum kit

Use the free Wiki2web Studio to generate printable flashcards, worksheets, exams, and export your materials as a web page or an interactive game.

True or False?

Test Your Knowledge!

Gamer's Corner

Are you ready for the Wiki2Web Clarity Challenge?

Learn about american_recovery_and_reinvestment_act_of_2009 while playing the wiki2web Clarity Challenge game.

Unlock the mystery image and prove your knowledge by earning trophies. This simple game is addictively fun and is a great way to learn!

Play now

Explore More Topics

Discover other topics to study!

prospect dolerite intrusion

References

Roll call vote 046, via Clerk.House.gov

Roll call vote 59, via Senate.gov

Roll call vote 60, via Senate.gov

House Conference report 111-? Final partially handwritten report released by Nancy Pelosi's Office 2/13/09

Roll call vote 070, via Clerk.House.gov

Note that there are deviations in how some sources allocate spending and tax incentives and loans to different categories

H.R. 1 (111th Cong.) ENR Title XIII

The American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 (ARRA); Enacted February 17, 2009 fhwa.dot.gov

stimulus summary.xls. (PDF) . Retrieved on 2014-05-11.

Obama's $800bn stimulus may not be enough, Irish Times

CBO letter to Sen. Judd Gregg. February 11, 2010. http://www.cbo.gov/ftpdocs/99xx/doc9987/Gregg_Year-by-Year_Stimulus.pdf

A full list of references for this article are available at the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 Wikipedia page

Feedback & Support

To report an issue with this page, or to find out ways to support the mission, please click here.

Disclaimer

Important Notice

This page has been generated by an Artificial Intelligence and is intended for informational and educational purposes only. The content is derived from publicly available data and has been refined to align with academic standards for a Master's level audience.

This is not financial or economic advice. The information provided herein is not a substitute for professional consultation regarding economic policy, fiscal management, or legislative analysis. Always consult with qualified experts for specific advice tailored to your needs. Reliance on any information provided on this page is solely at your own risk.

The creators of this page are not responsible for any errors, omissions, or for any actions taken based on the information provided. The data reflects information available at the time of its compilation and may not account for subsequent developments or revised analyses.

The American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009

💡 Dive in with Flashcard Learning! 💡

Act Overview ℹ️

🏛️ Legislative Framework

🎯 Primary Objectives

💰 Financial Scope and Rationale

Legislative Journey 📜

✍️ Drafting and Introduction

⚖️ Congressional Debate and Passage

🤝 Conference and Enactment

Key Provisions 🧩

📊 Allocation Breakdown

🏛️ Infobox Summary

📜 Statement of Purpose

Tax Incentives 💸

🧑‍💼 For Individuals

🏢 For Companies

Healthcare Investments ❤️

💻 Health Information Technology

🏥 State and Unemployed Support

🔬 Research and Prevention

Educational Funding 📚

🏫 State Fiscal Stabilization

🎓 Student Aid and Access

Infrastructure Investment 🏗️

🛣️ Transportation Networks

💧 Environmental and Public Lands

🏢 Government Facilities

Energy Sector Initiatives ⚡

💡 Efficiency and Renewables

🔌 Grid Modernization

Scientific Research Funding 🔬

🔭 Agency Investments

🛠️ Infrastructure and Instruments

Housing and Community Development 🏠

🏘️ Public and Affordable Housing

🏡 Neighborhood Stabilization

Oversight and Accountability 🔍

👨‍⚖️ Monitoring Mechanisms

🌐 Recovery.gov

⚖️ Independent Review

Teacher's Corner 🧑‍🏫

Edit and Print this course in the Wiki2Web Teacher Studio

True or False? 🤔

❓ Test Your Knowledge! ❓

Gamer's Corner 🎮

Are you ready for the Wiki2Web Clarity Challenge?

Explore More Topics

📜 Discover other topics to study!

References

📜 References

Feedback & Support 👍

To report an issue with this page, or to find out ways to support the mission, please click here.

Disclaimer ⚠️

📜 Important Notice

Dive in with Flashcard Learning!

Act Overview

Legislative Framework

Primary Objectives

Financial Scope and Rationale

Legislative Journey

Drafting and Introduction

Congressional Debate and Passage

Conference and Enactment

Key Provisions

Allocation Breakdown

Infobox Summary

Statement of Purpose

Tax Incentives

For Individuals

For Companies

Healthcare Investments

Health Information Technology

State and Unemployed Support

Research and Prevention

Educational Funding

State Fiscal Stabilization

Student Aid and Access

Infrastructure Investment

Transportation Networks

Environmental and Public Lands

Government Facilities

Energy Sector Initiatives

Efficiency and Renewables

Grid Modernization

Scientific Research Funding

Agency Investments

Infrastructure and Instruments

Housing and Community Development

Public and Affordable Housing

Neighborhood Stabilization

Oversight and Accountability

Monitoring Mechanisms

Recovery.gov

Independent Review

Teacher's Corner

True or False?

Test Your Knowledge!

Gamer's Corner

Discover other topics to study!

References

Feedback & Support

Disclaimer

Important Notice