This is a visual explainer based on the Wikipedia article on the Battle of Verdun. Read the full source article here. (opens in new tab)

Verdun: The Anvil of Attrition

An exhaustive analysis of the longest and most devastating battle of the First World War, where military strategy was measured in human lives.

Uncover the Strategy 👇 Explore the Battle ⚔️

Dive in with Flashcard Learning!


When you are ready...
🎮 Play the Wiki2Web Clarity Challenge Game🎮

The German Gamble

Falkenhayn's Attrition Strategy

The Battle of Verdun was born from a chilling strategic calculation by German Chief of Staff Erich von Falkenhayn. Believing a decisive breakthrough on the Western Front was impossible, he pivoted to a strategy of attrition (Ermattungsstrategie). His goal was not to capture the city of Verdun itself, but to threaten this point of immense national pride for France. Falkenhayn theorized that the French high command would be compelled to "throw in every man they have" to defend it. This would create a kill zone where German heavy artillery, enjoying a tactical advantage from the surrounding heights, could inflict catastrophic and unsustainable casualties on the French Army, effectively "bleeding France white" and forcing it to sue for a separate peace.

The Verdun Salient

For centuries, Verdun had been a cornerstone of French defense, a fortress city on the Meuse river. By 1916, it formed a salient—a bulge—in the Western Front, making it vulnerable to attack from three sides. The city was ringed by a double layer of 28 major forts and numerous smaller works, a system designed in the 1870s. However, French Commander-in-Chief Joseph Joffre, believing modern super-heavy artillery had rendered such fortifications obsolete, had significantly weakened the Verdun defenses. In 1915, he ordered the removal of over 54 artillery batteries and 128,000 rounds of ammunition. Forts like the colossal Douaumont were stripped of their guns and left with skeleton maintenance crews, a critical miscalculation that would have devastating consequences.

Battle Statistics at a Glance

The Battle of Verdun was one of the longest, costliest, and most ferocious battles in human history, lasting 302 days from February to December 1916.

Category German Empire French Republic
Primary Commanders Erich von Falkenhayn, Crown Prince Wilhelm, Max von Gallwitz Joseph Joffre, Philippe Pétain, Robert Nivelle, Charles Mangin
Initial Strength Approx. 50 divisions committed over the course of the battle Approx. 75 divisions rotated through the battle (Noria system)
Total Casualties ~336,000–355,000 ~379,000–400,000
Fatalities (Killed/Missing) c. 143,000 c. 163,000
Total Estimated Casualties Over 714,000 (averaging over 70,000 per month)
Outcome Decisive French strategic victory; German offensive halted

The Ten-Month Siege

Phase I: Operation Judgement (Feb 21 – Mar 1)

After weather delays, the German offensive, codenamed Unternehmen Gericht (Operation Judgement), began on February 21 with a ten-hour artillery bombardment of unprecedented intensity. Over one million shells were fired by 808 guns, pulverizing the French front lines. At 4:00 p.m., German stormtroopers advanced, using flamethrowers and grenades to overwhelm the dazed French survivors. The initial advance was swift. Within three days, the Germans had pushed 5 km, but the pivotal moment came on February 25. A small party of German soldiers from the 24th Brandenburg Regiment found Fort Douaumont—the keystone of Verdun's eastern defenses—almost entirely undefended. They entered the fort without a fight and captured its skeleton crew, a massive tactical victory and a devastating psychological blow to France.

Phase II: The West Bank (Mar 6 – Apr 15)

The German advance on the east bank stalled as it came under punishing fire from French artillery positioned on the west bank of the Meuse. To eliminate this threat, Falkenhayn reluctantly expanded the offensive. On March 6, the Germans attacked key positions on the west bank, primarily the twin hills of Le Mort Homme (The Dead Man) and Côte 304 (Hill 304). What followed was a brutal, grinding fight for these commanding heights. The Germans captured parts of Mort Homme but faced relentless French counter-attacks. The battle for the west bank turned into a miniature Verdun, a costly sideshow that failed to achieve its objective of silencing the French guns and instead consumed even more German resources.

Phase III: The Grinding Match (Apr 16 – Jul 1)

With the offensive bogged down on both banks, the battle devolved into a series of localized, savage attacks and counter-attacks. In early May, General Philippe Pétain, who had organized the French defense, was promoted, and the more aggressive Robert Nivelle took command. The Germans shifted their focus back to the east bank, launching a major assault on Fort Vaux. After a week of brutal fighting, much of it underground in the fort's dark corridors, the French garrison, having run out of water, was forced to surrender on June 7. On June 22, the Germans unleashed a new weapon: Diphosgene (Green Cross) gas shells, which neutralized French artillery. The subsequent infantry attack captured the village of Fleury and brought German troops to within 4 km of Verdun's citadel, the high-water mark of their offensive.

Phase IV: The French Counter-Stroke (Jul 1 – Dec 18)

The strategic landscape of the war shifted dramatically on July 1 with the start of the Anglo-French Somme Offensive. This, combined with the Russian Brusilov Offensive on the Eastern Front, forced Germany to divert troops and artillery away from Verdun. The German offensive at Verdun was effectively over. The French, now under the command of Charles Mangin and Robert Nivelle, seized the initiative. Using innovative tactics like the creeping barrage, where infantry advanced closely behind a moving curtain of artillery fire, the French launched a series of counter-offensives. On October 24, they spectacularly recaptured Fort Douaumont. Fort Vaux was retaken on November 2. By mid-December, a final French push had driven the Germans back almost to their starting positions of February, securing a hard-won and symbolic victory for France.

Analysis & The Human Cost

The Failure of Attrition

Falkenhayn's strategy to "bleed France white" ultimately failed because it was based on a critical miscalculation: that Germany could inflict casualties at a far greater rate than it suffered them. He anticipated a kill ratio of 5:2 in Germany's favor. In reality, the brutal, reciprocal nature of trench warfare, dominated by artillery from both sides, resulted in a near 1:1 casualty ratio. The German 5th Army commanders, driven by the desire for a tangible victory, often reverted to costly infantry assaults rather than adhering to the pure attrition doctrine. The French army, though battered, never broke. The battle of attrition became a double-edged sword, draining the German army of its own strategic reserves and moral strength just as severely as it did the French.

The Noria System

A key factor in the French ability to withstand the German onslaught was General Pétain's "Noria" system of troop rotation. Named after the bucket-wheel system used for irrigation, this policy ensured that divisions were not left in the hellish conditions of the front line until they disintegrated. Instead, units were rapidly cycled in and out of the battle. While this meant that a vast proportion of the French Army (up to 85 of 95 divisions) eventually served at Verdun, it preserved the fighting capacity and morale of individual units. In contrast, German divisions were often kept in the line for far longer periods, leading to immense physical and psychological exhaustion and a degradation of combat effectiveness.

The Battlefield Environment

The fighting at Verdun transformed the landscape into a nightmarish moonscape. Relentless artillery fire, with an estimated 10 million shells fired, obliterated forests, villages, and the very topsoil itself. The clay-rich earth, churned by explosions and soaked by rain, became a quagmire of mud, shell craters, and human remains. Soldiers drowned in water-filled craters, and the psychological toll was immense. Accounts of "shell shock" and complete mental breakdowns were common. The French lieutenant Alfred Joubaire wrote in his diary, "Humanity is mad. It must be mad to do what it is doing... Hell cannot be so terrible. Men are mad!" This environment, as much as the enemy, became a relentless foe for the soldiers of both armies.

Legacy in Scars and Stone

A Symbol of a Nation

For France, Verdun is more than a battle; it is the defining memory of the Great War. It represents the pinnacle of national sacrifice and determination, encapsulated in Nivelle's famous order of the day, "Ils ne passeront pas!" (They shall not pass!). The battle's immense cost and ultimate victory forged a powerful symbol of French resilience. In 1920, the Unknown Soldier, who now rests beneath the Arc de Triomphe in Paris, was chosen from the unidentified dead of Verdun, cementing the battle's central place in the nation's commemorative consciousness.

The Red Zone (Zone Rouge)

The devastation was so complete that large areas of the battlefield were deemed uninhabitable after the war. This Zone Rouge (Red Zone) was a landscape poisoned by unexploded ordnance, chemical agents, and human remains. Six villages, including Beaumont-en-Verdunois and Fleury-devant-Douaumont, were declared "dead for France" and never rebuilt. Today, forests planted in the 1930s cover much of the scarred land, but the undulating ground, pockmarked with countless shell craters, remains a vast, silent graveyard and a stark testament to the battle's destructive power.

A Gesture of Reconciliation

In the decades following World War II, Verdun transformed from a symbol of bitter enmity into a powerful icon of Franco-German reconciliation. The shared memory of immense suffering became a foundation for peace. This transformation was famously symbolized on September 22, 1984, when French President François Mitterrand and German Chancellor Helmut Kohl stood hand-in-hand at the Douaumont Ossuary. This simple, poignant gesture acknowledged their common loss and marked a profound step towards a united Europe, built upon the lessons learned from the continent's darkest hours.

Teacher's Corner

Edit and Print this course in the Wiki2Web Teacher Studio

Edit and Print Materials from this study in the wiki2web studio
Click here to open the "Battle Of Verdun" Wiki2Web Studio curriculum kit

Use the free Wiki2web Studio to generate printable flashcards, worksheets, exams, and export your materials as a web page or an interactive game.

True or False?

Test Your Knowledge!

Gamer's Corner

Are you ready for the Wiki2Web Clarity Challenge?

Learn about battle_of_verdun while playing the wiki2web Clarity Challenge game.
Unlock the mystery image and prove your knowledge by earning trophies. This simple game is addictively fun and is a great way to learn!

Play now

Explore More Topics

Discover other topics to study!

                                        

References

References

  1.  Schwencke 1925–1930, p. 118; Holstein 2011, p. 82.
  2.  Schwencke 1925–1930, pp. 118–124.
  3.  Chickering & Förster 2006, pp. 130, 126.
  4.  Terraine 1992, p. 59; Dupuy & Dupuy 1993, p. 1052.
A full list of references for this article are available at the Battle of Verdun Wikipedia page

Feedback & Support

To report an issue with this page, or to find out ways to support the mission, please click here.

Disclaimer

Important Notice

This page was generated by an Artificial Intelligence and is intended for informational and educational purposes only. The content is based on a snapshot of publicly available data from Wikipedia and may not be entirely accurate, complete, or up-to-date.

This is not professional historical advice. The information provided on this website is not a substitute for scholarly research or consultation with a qualified historian. The interpretations and analyses presented here are for educational context and should not be used as a primary source for academic work. Always consult peer-reviewed historical texts and primary sources for serious study.

The creators of this page are not responsible for any errors or omissions, or for any actions taken based on the information provided herein.