This is an academic overview derived from the Wikipedia article on Carl Schmitt. Access the source material here. (opens in new tab)

Carl Schmitt: Architect of Political Thought

An exploration of the influential, yet deeply controversial, German jurist and political theorist, examining his core concepts and historical context.

Discover Schmitt 👇 Explore Key Texts 📚

Dive in with Flashcard Learning!


When you are ready...
🎮 Play the Wiki2Web Clarity Challenge Game🎮

Biographical Foundations

Early Life and Education

Born in Plettenberg, German Empire, Carl Schmitt (1888–1985) embarked on his academic journey in law. He pursued legal studies at the Universities of Berlin, Munich, and Strasbourg, culminating in doctoral and habilitation degrees from Strasbourg in 1910 and 1916, respectively. His early academic work, including his doctoral thesis "On Guilt and Types of Guilt," laid the groundwork for his later theoretical explorations.

Religious and Intellectual Influences

Schmitt's early life was marked by a devout Roman Catholic upbringing, though he later distanced himself from the Church. During his time in Munich, he attended lectures by Max Weber, engaging with concepts like "Politics as a Vocation." These intellectual encounters, alongside his personal spiritual journey, profoundly shaped his perspective on the relationship between theology and political structures.

Academic and Legal Trajectory

Professorships and Key Publications

Schmitt held academic positions at several German universities, including Greifswald, Bonn, Munich, Cologne, and Berlin. During this period, he published seminal works that defined his critical stance against liberal democracy and parliamentary systems. His 1922 essay, Political Theology, introduced the concept that "The sovereign is he who decides on the exception," a cornerstone of his political theory.

Constitutional Theory and Practice

Schmitt actively engaged with contemporary legal and political issues. He served as counsel for the Reich government in the significant 1932 case Preussen contra Reich, concerning the federal structure of the Weimar Republic. This involvement highlighted his theoretical contributions to understanding constitutional crises and the nature of state power.

Political Engagement and Controversy

Nazi Party Affiliation

Schmitt joined the Nazi Party in May 1933, aligning himself with the regime and providing theoretical justifications for its actions. He held prominent positions, including editor-in-chief of the Deutsche Juristen-Zeitung and president of the Association of National Socialist German Jurists. His writings from this period, such as "The Leader Protects the Law," supported the Nazi legal and political order.

Despite his initial enthusiasm, Schmitt's position within the Nazi hierarchy became precarious due to internal party critiques questioning his loyalty and intellectual alignment. The SS publication Das Schwarze Korps accused him of opportunism and adherence to Hegelian and Catholic thought, leading to his resignation from certain party posts. However, he retained his professorship and state council position, continuing his work under the regime until the end of World War II.

Post-War Isolation and Continued Work

Following World War II, Schmitt was interned by American forces. Barred from academic positions due to his Nazi past and refusal of denazification processes, he lived in relative isolation in Plettenberg. Despite this, he continued his intellectual work, focusing on international law and engaging with visiting scholars, maintaining a significant, albeit controversial, intellectual presence.

Seminal Works and Concepts

The Dictatorship and Political Theology

In The Dictatorship (1921), Schmitt analyzed the Weimar Constitution, emphasizing the President's power to declare a "state of exception" (Ausnahmezustand). Political Theology (1922) further developed this, defining sovereignty as the authority to decide on exceptions, arguing that "all significant concepts of the modern theory of the state are secularized theological concepts."

The Concept of the Political

Schmitt's 1932 essay, "The Concept of the Political," posits that the essence of politics lies in the distinction between "friend" and "enemy." This existential grouping, he argued, defines political identity and necessitates a sovereign power capable of decisive action, distinguishing the political realm from economic or moral spheres.

The friend-enemy distinction is not based on moral judgment but on the potential for intense, existential conflict between political entities. Schmitt contended that political concepts are polemical, deriving their meaning from concrete conflicts. This framework was later applied to justify Nazi ideology's identification and targeting of enemies.

Nomos of the Earth

Published in 1950, The Nomos of the Earth examines the historical development and decline of the Eurocentric international legal order. Schmitt viewed the European sovereign state as a product of rationalism that civilized warfare by limiting it to state-vs-state conflicts. He analyzed the rise of the New World and the United States' role in shaping a new global order.

Literary and Historical Analysis

Schmitt also applied his theoretical lens to literature and history. Works like Hamlet or Hecuba (1956) explored the interplay of aesthetics, politics, and history through literary analysis. Theory of the Partisan (1962) re-examined concepts of war and enmity in the post-European age, influencing later scholarship on conflict and terrorism.

Enduring Legacy and Debate

Contemporary Relevance

Schmitt's ideas continue to resonate across the political spectrum, influencing contemporary discussions on sovereignty, constitutionalism, and international relations. Scholars argue his theories have impacted political thought in nations like China and Russia, and movements such as neoconservatism and Trumpism, highlighting the persistent relevance of his critiques of liberal democracy.

Critical Reception

While recognized as a significant thinker, Schmitt remains highly controversial due to his Nazi affiliations and the perceived authoritarian nature of his theories. Critics, like Richard Wolin, note that his proposed "cure" for the weaknesses of liberalism proved far worse than the perceived disease. His concept of the "state of exception" has been particularly influential, albeit debated, in analyses of modern governance and emergency powers.

Influence on Left and Right

Schmitt's work is referenced by both the intellectual left and right. Thinkers like Giorgio Agamben and Chantal Mouffe engage with his concepts of political theology and the state of exception. Simultaneously, his critiques of liberalism and emphasis on decisive leadership find resonance within conservative and nationalist circles, demonstrating the complex and contested nature of his intellectual legacy.

Teacher's Corner

Edit and Print this course in the Wiki2Web Teacher Studio

Edit and Print Materials from this study in the wiki2web studio
Click here to open the "Carl Schmitt" Wiki2Web Studio curriculum kit

Use the free Wiki2web Studio to generate printable flashcards, worksheets, exams, and export your materials as a web page or an interactive game.

True or False?

Test Your Knowledge!

Gamer's Corner

Are you ready for the Wiki2Web Clarity Challenge?

Learn about carl_schmitt while playing the wiki2web Clarity Challenge game.
Unlock the mystery image and prove your knowledge by earning trophies. This simple game is addictively fun and is a great way to learn!

Play now

Explore More Topics

Discover other topics to study!

                                        

References

References

  1.  Oliver W. Lembcke, Claudia Ritzi, Gary S. Schaal (eds.): Zeitgenössische Demokratietheorien: Band 1: Normative Demokratietheorien, Springer, 2014, p. 331.
  2.  Vinx 2019, ch. 5 "Liberal Cosmopolitanism and ...".
  3.  McCormick, John P. Carl Schmitt's Critique of Liberalism: Against Politics as Technology. 1st paperback ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999:86–87.
  4.  Müller, Jan-Werner. A Dangerous Mind: Carl Schmitt in Post-War European Thought. New Haven: Yale University Press, 2003:xxix.
  5.  Deutsche Juristen-Zeitung, 38, 1934; trans. as "The Führer Protects Justice" in Detlev Vagts, Carl Schmitt's Ultimate Emergency: The Night of the Long Knives (2012) 87(2) The Germanic Review 203.
  6.  Carl Schmitt and Leo Strauss: the hidden dialogue, Heinrich Meier, University of Chicago Press 1995, 123
  7.  Carl Schmitt and Leo Strauss: the hidden dialogue, Heinrich Meier, University of Chicago Press 1995, 125
  8.  Howse, Robert. (2003). The use and abuse of Leo Strauss in the Schmitt revival on the German right—The case of Heinrich Meier. University of Michigan Law School.
  9.  Löwith, Karl. (1995). “The Occasional Decisionism of Carl Schmitt.” in K. Löwith, Martin Heidegger and European Nihilism, R. Wolin (ed.) and G. Steiner (trans.), New York: Columbia University Press, pp. 37–69.
  10.  See for example Lebovic, Nitzan (2008), "The Jerusalem School: The Theo-Political Hour", New German Critique (103), 97–120.
A full list of references for this article are available at the Carl Schmitt Wikipedia page

Feedback & Support

To report an issue with this page, or to find out ways to support the mission, please click here.

Academic Disclaimer

Important Considerations

This content has been generated by an AI model for educational purposes, drawing exclusively from the provided source material. While efforts have been made to ensure accuracy and maintain an academic tone suitable for advanced study, the information reflects a specific dataset and may not encompass all nuances or interpretations of Carl Schmitt's complex and controversial body of work.

This is not political or legal advice. The material presented is intended for informational and analytical purposes only and should not substitute professional consultation in political science, law, or history. Readers are encouraged to consult primary sources and diverse scholarly analyses for a comprehensive understanding.

The creators of this page are not responsible for any interpretations, omissions, or actions taken based on the information provided.