The Intuitive Compass
Navigating Knowledge with Common Sense: An exploration of its historical philosophical roots, evolution, and enduring relevance.
What is Common Sense? ๐ Key Thinkers ๐งDive in with Flashcard Learning!
๐ฎ Play the Wiki2Web Clarity Challenge Game๐ฎ
What is Common Sense?
Sound Judgment
Common sense is often defined as sound practical judgment or knowledge of basic facts that most adult human beings are expected to possess. It represents a fundamental capacity for discernment in everyday matters, often held without explicit reasoning or debate.
Universal Understanding
The term "common" signifies that this knowledge and judgment are shared by nearly all people. It acts as a baseline for understanding and interacting with the world, forming a shared intellectual and practical foundation within society.
Linguistic Roots
The concept originates from the Latin term sensus communis and the Ancient Greek koinฤ aisthฤsis. While direct translations can vary, these terms broadly refer to a shared sensory or cognitive faculty, highlighting its communal and perceptual dimensions.
Etymological Foundations
Aristotelian Origins
Aristotle first articulated the concept of a "common sense" (koinฤ aisthฤsis) as a faculty that integrates perceptions from the five specialized senses. This faculty allows for the discrimination of objects by processing sensory data, distinct from individual sensory perceptions and higher rational thought.
Roman Ethical Dimension
In Roman thought, influenced by Stoicism, sensus communis evolved to include a natural sensitivity towards fellow humans and the community. This meaning emphasized shared notions, ethical virtue, and a sense of public spirit, contributing to a more socially oriented understanding.
Linguistic Nuances
While English often uses "common sense" broadly, other languages have distinct terms. French bon sens (good sense) and German Gemeinsinn (community sense) highlight different facets, reflecting the complex evolution and varied interpretations of the concept across cultures.
Historical Trajectory
Medieval and Renaissance
The Aristotelian concept of common sense was preserved and debated by medieval scholars. Later, during the Renaissance and Enlightenment, it became intertwined with discussions on rhetoric, taste, and the foundations of knowledge, often contrasted with purely rationalistic or metaphysical approaches.
Enlightenment Debates
The Enlightenment saw common sense emerge as a positive concept, associated with empiricism and modernity, contrasting with the perceived obscurantism of metaphysics. Thinkers like Thomas Paine championed "common sense" as a tool for political and social change.
Rationalism vs. Empiricism
Renรฉ Descartes, while acknowledging bon sens, cautioned against its uncritical use, advocating for methodical skepticism. This sparked a debate with empiricists like John Locke and David Hume, who emphasized experience and inductive reasoning, often grounding common sense in shared experience and emotion.
Philosophical Evolution
Cartesian Skepticism
Descartes' emphasis on methodical doubt and mathematical certainty led to a re-evaluation of common sense. He located the faculty in the pineal gland, but his approach ultimately questioned the reliability of unexamined judgment, paving the way for its eventual rejection as a primary epistemological tool.
Post-Cartesian Critiques
Following Descartes, philosophers like Hobbes and Spinoza further emphasized reason over common sense. However, figures like Berkeley and Hume sought to ground knowledge in experience and natural sentiment, re-emphasizing aspects of common sense, particularly in ethics and epistemology.
Kant and Aesthetics
Immanuel Kant proposed a specific meaning of sensus communis in aesthetics, referring to a communal faculty of judgment that considers the perspectives of others. He distinguished this from the more general "healthy understanding" criticized by the Scottish school, highlighting its role in shared aesthetic appreciation.
Key Thinkers
Aristotle
Introduced the concept of koinฤ aisthฤsis as the faculty integrating sensory input, crucial for perceiving common sensibles like shape and motion. This laid the groundwork for subsequent philosophical discussions.
Renรฉ Descartes
While acknowledging bon sens (good sense), Descartes cautioned against its uncritical reliance, advocating for methodical skepticism. He located the faculty in the pineal gland, bridging the gap between mind and body.
Thomas Reid
Founder of the Scottish School of Common Sense Realism, Reid posited common sense as a set of self-evident principles essential for life, defending it against Hume's skepticism and emphasizing its innate, necessary nature.
Immanuel Kant
Developed a unique concept of sensus communis for aesthetics, emphasizing a communal judgment that considers universal human perspectives. He distinguished this from the empirical "healthy understanding."
Giambattista Vico
Integrated Greek and Roman meanings, advocating for a humanist interpretation of common sense. Vico saw it as essential for rhetoric, practical judgment, and understanding the wisdom of nations, critiquing Cartesian rationalism.
Contemporary Relevance
Epistemology and Ethics
In contemporary philosophy, common sense remains a subject of debate in epistemology (e.g., G.E. Moore's defense, phenomenal conservatism) and ethics. It informs discussions on foundational beliefs, moral sentiment, and the nature of rational discourse.
Social Sciences
The concept influences economic theory (methodological individualism vs. social sentiment) and political philosophy. Debates continue on whether to prioritize rational models or acknowledge the role of shared understanding and communal judgment in societal structures.
Postmodern Critiques
Postmodern thought, particularly figures like Lyotard, has introduced concepts like "dissensus communis," questioning the possibility of universal common ground. Hannah Arendt adapted Kant's idea for political judgment, highlighting the absence of common sense as a factor in the "banality of evil."
Cultural Variations
French Bon Sens
In French, bon sens emphasizes practical wisdom and good judgment, often associated with clarity and reasonableness. It aligns closely with the modern English understanding of common sense as sound practical reasoning.
German Gemeinsinn
German philosophy distinguishes between gesunder Verstand (healthy understanding, akin to English common sense) and Gemeinsinn (community sense). The latter, influenced by Kant, refers to a shared sensibility and public spirit, crucial for social cohesion and aesthetic judgment.
British Pragmatism
British philosophers like Shaftesbury and Hutcheson emphasized the moral and social dimensions of common sense, linking it to empathy and public spirit. This influenced later thinkers and contributed to the pragmatic tradition, valuing practical outcomes and shared experience.
References
Source Material
The content presented here is derived from a comprehensive analysis of philosophical texts and historical discourse on common sense. The following list provides the foundational sources consulted.
Teacher's Corner
Edit and Print this course in the Wiki2Web Teacher Studio

Click here to open the "Common Sense" Wiki2Web Studio curriculum kit
Use the free Wiki2web Studio to generate printable flashcards, worksheets, exams, and export your materials as a web page or an interactive game.
True or False?
Test Your Knowledge!
Gamer's Corner
Are you ready for the Wiki2Web Clarity Challenge?
Unlock the mystery image and prove your knowledge by earning trophies. This simple game is addictively fun and is a great way to learn!
Play now
References
References
- De Anima column 427a. Plato, in his Theaetatus 185aรขยยc uses the question of how to judge if sound or colour are salty.
- Posterior Analytics II.19.
- Gregoriรย (2007, p.ย 11). See below concerning Descartes.
- De Oratore, I, 3, 12
- Descartes (1901) Chapter: MEDITATION II.: Of the Nature of the Human Mind; and that It is More Easily Known than the Body.
- Descartes (1901) Chapter: MEDITATION VI.: Of the Existence of Material Things, and of the Real Distinction Between the Mind and Body of Man.
- Chapter II, "OF PRINCIPLES ADVERSE TO THAT OF UTILITY", in "An Introduction to the Principles of Morals and Legislation".
- Vico (1968), I.ii "Elements" (รยงรยง141-146) and I.iv "Method" (รยงรยง347-350).
- Gadamer (1989, pp.ย 32รขยย34). Note: The source makes it clear that "English" includes Scottish authors.
Feedback & Support
To report an issue with this page, or to find out ways to support the mission, please click here.
Disclaimer
Important Notice
This page was generated by an Artificial Intelligence and is intended for informational and educational purposes only. The content is based on a synthesis of philosophical and historical texts and may not capture the full nuance or complexity of every perspective.
This is not philosophical advice. The information provided on this website is not a substitute for professional academic consultation, critical analysis, or independent research. Always engage with primary sources and scholarly discourse for a comprehensive understanding of philosophical concepts.
The creators of this page are not responsible for any errors or omissions, or for any actions taken based on the information provided herein.