This is an analytical overview based on the Wikipedia article on the February 1992 Venezuelan coup attempt. Read the full source article here. (opens in new tab)

Venezuela's Crucible

An analytical exploration of the pivotal events of the February 1992 coup attempt, examining its causes, execution, and lasting impact on the nation's political landscape.

Overview 👇 Historical Context 📜

Dive in with Flashcard Learning!


When you are ready...
🎮 Play the Wiki2Web Clarity Challenge Game🎮

The February 1992 Coup Attempt

The Event

On 4 February 1992, a significant attempt was made to overthrow the government of President Carlos Andrés Pérez. This coordinated action was led by the Revolutionary Bolivarian Movement-200 (MBR-200), spearheaded by Lieutenant Colonel Hugo Chávez.

Despite its ultimate failure to depose the government, the coup attempt dramatically propelled Chávez into the national consciousness, marking a critical turning point in Venezuelan political history.

Objectives and Outcome

The primary objective was to seize control of the state apparatus and remove President Pérez, whom the MBR-200 viewed as corrupt and responsible for the nation's severe economic decline and social unrest.

The coup failed due to a combination of strategic miscalculations, loyalist resistance, and communication breakdowns. However, it exposed deep-seated discontent within the military and populace.

Immediate Impact

The violence associated with the coup resulted in significant casualties, officially numbering at least 143 dead and hundreds injured, predominantly civilians caught in the crossfire.

While militarily unsuccessful, the event served as a catalyst, weakening the established political system and paving the way for future political transformations.

Historical Context

Economic Decline

Venezuela had experienced a period of prosperity in the 1970s due to high oil prices. However, the 1980s saw a sharp decline in oil revenues, leading to severe economic contraction. Per capita income dropped significantly, exacerbating poverty, inflation, and unemployment.

The government's fiscal policies and reliance on international loans, coupled with widespread corruption, fueled public outrage, particularly among the lower classes.

Social Unrest

In response to International Monetary Fund (IMF)-mandated austerity measures, President Pérez implemented liberalization policies in 1989. These reforms, including reduced social spending and removal of price controls, disproportionately affected the poor.

This discontent erupted into widespread protests known as the "Caracazo" beginning on 27 February 1989, which were met with brutal state repression, further deepening societal divisions.

Political Landscape

Venezuela had enjoyed relative democratic stability since 1958, characterized by a bipartisan system dominated by Democratic Action (AD) and COPEI. However, this system was increasingly perceived as corrupt and clientelistic.

The economic crisis and the government's handling of the Caracazo eroded public trust in the established political parties, creating fertile ground for radical alternatives.

Origins of the Movement

MBR-200 Formation

The Revolutionary Bolivarian Movement-200 (MBR-200) was founded in 1982 by Lieutenant Colonel Hugo Chávez Frías. The movement drew inspiration from the ideals of Simón Bolívar and sought to fundamentally change Venezuela's political and economic system.

Key figures like Francisco Arias Cárdenas joined Chávez, united by their rejection of the ruling political establishment and the nation's socio-economic conditions.

Alleged Cuban Influence

Sources suggest potential involvement or influence from Cuba, particularly its intelligence agency (DGI), in the planning and execution of the coup. This alleged support aimed to destabilize Venezuela and potentially secure Cuban strategic interests.

Allegations include the provision of intelligence, strategic advice, and sleeper agents to foster unrest, with Chávez potentially serving as a figurehead to mitigate direct U.S. intervention.

Strategic Goals

The MBR-200's core grievance was the perceived corruption and ineffectiveness of the traditional political parties (AD and COPEI). They aimed to dismantle this system and establish a new form of governance.

The coup plotters envisioned a radical transformation, potentially involving a civil-military action to reshape the nation's future.

The Coup Attempt Unfolds

Execution of the Plan

The coup commenced in the early hours of 4 February 1992. Chávez's units moved to seize key military and communication installations in Caracas, including Miraflores Palace and La Carlota military airport.

An initial objective was to intercept President Pérez upon his return from Davos, Switzerland, though this plan was complicated by intelligence failures and Pérez's evasive maneuvers.

Confrontation and Resistance

Insurgent forces faced resistance from loyalist troops. A significant firefight occurred near Miraflores Palace, resulting in casualties among Pérez's bodyguards and preventing the capture of the president.

Rebel advances were made in cities like Valencia, Maracaibo, and Maracay, supported by some civilian elements, but the failure to secure Caracas proved critical.

Chávez's Broadcast

Following the operational setbacks, Chávez surrendered. He was permitted to appear on national television to call for an end to hostilities. In this broadcast, he famously stated that the objectives had not been achieved "por ahora" ("for now"), signaling his intent to continue the struggle.

This televised address, despite the military failure, cemented his image as a defiant leader among segments of the population.

Government and International Response

Presidential Reaction

President Pérez, having evaded capture, rallied loyal military forces. His directive was clear: "No negotiations. Give them bullets." This firm stance aimed to quell the rebellion decisively.

The government's suppression of the coup involved significant force, leading to accusations of extrajudicial killings and disproportionate use of violence against both combatants and civilians.

Legal and Civil Liberties

In the aftermath, constitutional guarantees were suspended, and media censorship was imposed. Demonstrations calling for Pérez's resignation were met with state violence.

The trials of the coup participants were conducted under military justice systems, drawing criticism for potential due process violations, although the Supreme Court later found procedural issues unrelated to the core criticisms.

International Condemnation

Governments worldwide, including Brazil, Cuba, Mexico, the United States, and the European Community, condemned the coup attempts. This international stance reinforced the legitimacy of the existing Venezuelan government.

Despite the condemnation, the underlying issues that fueled the coup—economic hardship and political disillusionment—persisted, influencing future political developments.

The Aftermath and Legacy

Chávez's Ascendancy

The failed coup paradoxically elevated Hugo Chávez to a national hero status among many impoverished Venezuelans who saw him as a symbol of resistance against corruption and inequality.

Imprisoned after the event, Chávez used his platform to articulate his vision, which resonated widely and set the stage for his eventual political rise.

Political Realignment

The coup attempts significantly weakened the traditional bipartisanship of AD and COPEI. President Pérez eventually resigned in May 1993 amidst corruption charges.

The political vacuum and public disillusionment allowed Rafael Caldera, who had allegedly been aware of the coup plot, to win the 1993 presidential election, promising pardons for the coup plotters.

Path to Power

The pardons granted to the coup participants, including Chávez, enabled them to re-enter political life. Chávez's subsequent participation and victory in the 1998 presidential election marked the beginning of the Bolivarian Revolution.

Several leaders from the coup attempt, such as Francisco Arias Cárdenas, later played prominent roles in Venezuelan politics, underscoring the long-term impact of the 1992 events.

Media and International Perspectives

Media Coverage

Media outlets like the Los Angeles Times highlighted the underlying causes of the coup attempts, pointing to regional recession, government corruption, and potential involvement of military factions in illicit activities.

The narrative often focused on the deep-seated instability and the potential for military figures to exploit the situation for personal gain or political power.

Global Viewpoint

International reactions were largely condemnatory, with major global powers and regional organizations expressing support for the Venezuelan government and denouncing the use of force.

This unified international stance underscored the prevailing norm against military coups in the Americas during that era.

Teacher's Corner

Edit and Print this course in the Wiki2Web Teacher Studio

Edit and Print Materials from this study in the wiki2web studio
Click here to open the "February 1992 Venezuelan Coup Attempt" Wiki2Web Studio curriculum kit

Use the free Wiki2web Studio to generate printable flashcards, worksheets, exams, and export your materials as a web page or an interactive game.

True or False?

Test Your Knowledge!

Gamer's Corner

Are you ready for the Wiki2Web Clarity Challenge?

Learn about february_1992_venezuelan_coup_attempt while playing the wiki2web Clarity Challenge game.
Unlock the mystery image and prove your knowledge by earning trophies. This simple game is addictively fun and is a great way to learn!

Play now

Explore More Topics

References

References

  1.  Statistical Abstract of the United States, 1971. 1982, and 1994 editions, "Comparative International Statistics"
A full list of references for this article are available at the February 1992 Venezuelan coup attempt Wikipedia page

Feedback & Support

To report an issue with this page, or to find out ways to support the mission, please click here.

Disclaimer

Important Notice

This page was generated by an Artificial Intelligence and is intended for informational and educational purposes only. The content is based on a snapshot of publicly available data from Wikipedia and may not be entirely accurate, complete, or up-to-date.

This is not historical or political advice. The information provided on this website is not a substitute for professional historical analysis, political science consultation, or expert interpretation. Always refer to primary sources and consult with qualified professionals for specific academic or research needs.

The creators of this page are not responsible for any errors or omissions, or for any actions taken based on the information provided herein.