Philippine Federalism: Pathways to Decentralization
An academic exploration of the historical evolution, proposed structures, and political discourse surrounding federalism in the Philippines.
Overview ๐ Key Initiatives ๐๏ธDive in with Flashcard Learning!
๐ฎ Play the Wiki2Web Clarity Challenge Game๐ฎ
Understanding Federalism in the Philippines
Defining the Movement
Federalism in the Philippines refers to various political movements advocating for a federal system of governance. This concept has gained significant traction among the Filipino populace in recent decades, with numerous political figures successfully incorporating federalist platforms into their campaigns. Notably, Bongbong Marcos secured the presidency in 2022 under the banner of the pro-federalist Partido Federal ng Pilipinas (PFP).
Core Principles
At its heart, federalism involves the division of powers between a central national government and constituent political units (states or regions). Proponents argue that this structure can lead to more efficient governance, better resource allocation, and greater responsiveness to the diverse needs of the archipelago's various regions, particularly those outside the traditional center of power in Metro Manila.
Growing Popularity
The appeal of federalism has been amplified by concerns over perceived governmental inefficiency, regional disparities, and the desire for greater local autonomy. Political leaders have championed federalism as a means to address historical grievances, foster economic development at the regional level, and potentially resolve long-standing socio-political issues, especially in regions like Mindanao.
Historical Roots and Evolution
Early Visions
The concept of federal governance in the Philippines traces back to the late 19th century. National hero Dr. Jose Rizal, in his 1889 essay "Filipinas dentro de cien aรฑos" ("The Philippines a Century Hence"), envisioned a federalist structure for the nation. Later, during the revolutionary period, Emilio Aguinaldo and Apolinario Mabini proposed dividing the islands into three federal states: Luzon, Visayas, and Mindanao. This led to the establishment of the short-lived Federal State of the Visayas, which was later abolished by the central government in Malolos.
21st Century Advocacy
In the contemporary era, prominent figures like Professor Jose Abueva of the University of the Philippines have been key advocates, arguing that federalism is essential for effectively managing the country's diversity and decentralizing power away from "Imperial Manila." Senator Aquilino Pimentel Jr. was another significant proponent, championing federalism from 2001 onwards as a means to address the Mindanao crisis, appease Moro insurgents, and accelerate economic development by granting states greater discretion over resources.
Public Sentiment and Resistance
The push for constitutional reform, including a shift to federalism, has often met with public skepticism and resistance. In 2009, significant protests occurred in Makati against proposed amendments, fueled by concerns that then-President Gloria Macapagal Arroyo might use charter change to extend her term. Public opinion surveys, such as those conducted by Pulse Asia, have consistently shown divided or predominantly opposed sentiments regarding federalism, often attributed to a lack of public awareness or distrust in the motives behind proposed reforms.
Duterte's Federalism Campaign
Rodrigo Duterte significantly propelled federalism into the national political discourse during his 2016 presidential campaign. He argued that federalism would improve service delivery, rectify the disproportionate allocation of funds favoring Metro Manila, and address the ethno-religious conflicts prevalent in Mindanao. His administration established a Consultative Committee (ConCom) via Executive Order No. 10 in 2016 to draft a new federal constitution, though proposed drafts faced criticism for omitting certain safeguards and removing the Vice Presidency.
Legislative and Administrative Initiatives
Under President Gloria Macapagal Arroyo
During President Arroyo's administration, significant legislative efforts were made towards federalism. In 2008, Senator Aquilino Pimentel Jr. introduced Joint Resolution No. 10, proposing a revision of the 1987 Constitution to establish a federal and presidential system with a bicameral legislature. This resolution envisioned the creation of eleven federal states and one federal administrative region, with proposed capitals and geographic extents.
Additionally, House Concurrent Resolution No. 15, filed by Rep. Monico Puentevella, supported the Senate's resolution and introduced the option of a constitutional convention, while excluding the People's Initiative mode for amendments. Speaker Prospero Nograles, a proponent of federalism, expressed strong support for these moves.
Under President Rodrigo Duterte
President Rodrigo Duterte made federalism a cornerstone of his platform. Upon taking office, he issued Executive Order No. 10, establishing a 25-member Consultative Committee (ConCom) tasked with reviewing the 1987 Constitution. The ConCom submitted draft proposals, notably one on July 9, 2018, which aimed to establish a federal republic. However, subsequent versions faced criticism for omitting safeguards against political dynasties and turncoatism, and for removing the position of Vice President.
The Duterte administration continued to pursue the shift, exploring options such as a Constitutional Convention (Con-Con), Constituent Assembly (Con-Ass), or people's initiative to amend the constitution. The submission of the Bangsamoro Basic Law, establishing an autonomous region, also provided momentum for federalism proponents seeking greater decentralization nationwide.
Public Opinion and Awareness
Awareness Levels
Surveys conducted in 2018 by organizations like Social Weather Stations (SWS) indicated a significant lack of public awareness regarding federalism. The SWS poll revealed that approximately 75% of Filipinos were unaware of federalism as a form of government. This low awareness level was identified as a key factor contributing to the limited public support for federalism initiatives.
Support and Opposition
Despite the low awareness, among those who were aware, opinions were divided. A Pulse Asia poll in March 2018 found that 27% of Filipinos supported a federal government, while a substantial 66% expressed opposition, and 6% remained unsure. Another SWS survey in early 2018 showed that among the aware respondents, 37% supported federalism, 29% opposed it, and 34% were undecided, highlighting a complex and evolving public sentiment.
Teacher's Corner
Edit and Print this course in the Wiki2Web Teacher Studio

Click here to open the "Federalism In The Philippines" Wiki2Web Studio curriculum kit
Use the free Wiki2web Studio to generate printable flashcards, worksheets, exams, and export your materials as a web page or an interactive game.
True or False?
Test Your Knowledge!
Gamer's Corner
Are you ready for the Wiki2Web Clarity Challenge?
Unlock the mystery image and prove your knowledge by earning trophies. This simple game is addictively fun and is a great way to learn!
Play now
References
References
- Eleven senators endorse federal system of govt.
Feedback & Support
To report an issue with this page, or to find out ways to support the mission, please click here.
Disclaimer
Important Notice
This page has been generated by an Artificial Intelligence and is intended solely for informational and educational purposes. The content is derived from publicly available data and may not encompass all nuances or the most current developments regarding federalism in the Philippines.
This is not political or legal advice. The information presented here should not be considered a substitute for professional consultation with political scientists, legal experts, or governance specialists. Always consult with qualified professionals for specific advice tailored to your needs. Do not disregard professional advice or delay seeking it due to information obtained from this page.
The creators of this page are not responsible for any inaccuracies, omissions, or actions taken based on the information provided herein.