This is an educational resource based on the Wikipedia article on Greenhouse Gases. Read the full source article here. (opens in new tab)

Atmospheric Sentinels

An authoritative exploration of the gases that regulate Earth's climate, from molecular interactions to global impact. Understand the science behind the greenhouse effect.

What are GHGs? 👇 Monitor Emissions 🛰️

Dive in with Flashcard Learning!


When you are ready...
🎮 Play the Wiki2Web Clarity Challenge Game🎮

Introduction to Greenhouse Gases

Regulating Earth's Temperature

Greenhouse gases (GHGs) are atmospheric constituents that absorb and emit thermal infrared radiation. This fundamental property enables the greenhouse effect, a natural process crucial for maintaining planetary habitability. Without these gases, Earth's average surface temperature would be approximately -18°C (0°F), significantly colder than the current average of 15°C (59°F).[2][3]

Key Atmospheric Components

The primary greenhouse gases in Earth's atmosphere, ranked by average global mole fraction, are water vapor (H₂O), carbon dioxide (CO₂), methane (CH₄), nitrous oxide (N₂O), and ozone (O₃). Additionally, synthetic compounds like chlorofluorocarbons (CFCs), hydrofluorocarbons (HFCs), perfluorocarbons (PFCs), sulfur hexafluoride (SF₆), and nitrogen trifluoride (NF₃) are potent GHGs, despite their lower atmospheric concentrations.[5][6]

Anthropogenic Influence

Since the Industrial Revolution (circa 1750), human activities have significantly increased atmospheric concentrations of GHGs. Carbon dioxide levels have risen by over 50%, and methane levels by approximately 150%.[8][9] CO₂ emissions, primarily from fossil fuel combustion, account for roughly three-quarters of the observed global warming, with methane contributing most of the remainder.[10]

Molecular Properties and Mechanisms

Infrared Absorption

Greenhouse gases are characterized by their ability to absorb and emit infrared radiation. This occurs because their molecular structure, containing atoms of different elements, allows for vibrational modes that interact with electromagnetic waves in the infrared spectrum. In contrast, diatomic molecules composed of the same element, such as nitrogen (N₂) and oxygen (O₂), which constitute about 99% of Earth's dry atmosphere, lack the necessary charge asymmetry and are largely transparent to thermal radiation.[20]

Atmospheric Transmission

The interaction between atmospheric gases and electromagnetic radiation varies significantly with wavelength. While certain wavelengths are readily absorbed by GHGs like CO₂ and water vapor, others pass through the atmosphere relatively unimpeded, creating "atmospheric windows." The absorption bands of CO₂, particularly around the 15-micron wavelength, coincide with the peak thermal emission from Earth's surface, explaining its significant heat-trapping capacity.[19]

Upper Atmosphere Cooling

The increased concentration of GHGs in the lower atmosphere not only traps heat near the surface but also leads to a cooling effect in the upper atmosphere. This occurs because heat re-emitted at higher altitudes is less likely to be reabsorbed by the thinner atmospheric layers, facilitating its escape into space. This phenomenon contributes to the contraction of the upper atmosphere.[30]

Major Greenhouse Gases

Gas Composition and Impact

The relative contribution of each gas to the greenhouse effect is determined by its atmospheric concentration, its ability to absorb infrared radiation, and its atmospheric lifetime. Water vapor, while the most abundant GHG and responsible for a substantial portion of the natural greenhouse effect (41-67%), acts primarily as a feedback mechanism in response to temperature changes, rather than a direct driver of warming.[32][33][35]

Global Warming Potential (GWP)

Global Warming Potential (GWP) quantifies the heat-trapping ability of a greenhouse gas relative to carbon dioxide over a specified time horizon (e.g., 20, 100, or 500 years). For instance, methane has a GWP-100 of approximately 27.9, indicating it traps 27.9 times more heat than CO₂ over a century. This metric allows for the calculation of carbon dioxide equivalents (CO₂e) to compare the climate impact of different gases.[39]

Key Greenhouse Gases Table

The following table details the primary long-lived greenhouse gases, their atmospheric lifetimes, 100-year Global Warming Potentials (GWPs), pre-industrial and current concentrations, and their associated radiative forcings.

IPCC list of greenhouse gases with lifetime, 100-year global warming potential, concentrations in the troposphere and radiative forcings. The abbreviations TAR, AR4, AR5 and AR6 refer to the different IPCC reports over the years. The baseline is pre-industrialization (year 1750).
Species Lifetime

(years) [48] : 731 

100-yr

GWP [48] : 731 

Mole Fraction [ppt — except as noted][A] + Radiative forcing [W m−2][B] Concentrations

over time[54][55]

up to year 2022

Baseline

Year 1750

TAR[56]

Year 1998

AR4[57]

Year 2005

AR5[48] : 678 

Year 2011

AR6[52] : 4–9 

Year 2019

CO₂ [ppm] [C] 1 278 365 (1.46) 379 (1.66) 391 (1.82) 410 (2.16) Mauna Loa CO2 monthly mean concentration.svg
CH₄ [ppb] 12.4 28 700 1,745 (0.48) 1,774 (0.48) 1,801 (0.48) 1866 (0.54) CH4_mm.png
N₂O [ppb] 121 265 270 314 (0.15) 319 (0.16) 324 (0.17) 332 (0.21) HATS_Nitrous_Oxide_concentration.png
CFC-11 45 4,660 0 268 (0.07) 251 (0.063) 238 (0.062) 226 (0.066) Hats_f11_global.png
CFC-12 100 10,200 0 533 (0.17) 538 (0.17) 528 (0.17) 503 (0.18) Hats_f12_global.png
CFC-13 640 13,900 0 4 (0.001) 2.7 (0.0007) 3.28 (0.0009) cfc13
CFC-113 85 6,490 0 84 (0.03) 79 (0.024) 74 (0.022) 70 (0.021) Hats_f113_global.png
CFC-114 190 7,710 0 15 (0.005) 16 (0.005) BK_CFC114.jpg
CFC-115 1,020 5,860 0 7 (0.001) 8.37 (0.0017) 8.67 (0.0021) cfc115
HCFC-22 11.9 5,280 0 132 (0.03) 169 (0.033) 213 (0.0447) 247 (0.0528) HCFC22_concentration.jpg
HCFC-141b 9.2 2,550 0 10 (0.001) 18 (0.0025) 21.4 (0.0034) 24.4 (0.0039) HCFC141b_concentration.jpg
HCFC-142b 17.2 5,020 0 11 (0.002) 15 (0.0031) 21.2 (0.0040) 22.3 (0.0043) HCFC142b_concentration.jpg
CH₃CCl₃ 5 160 0 69 (0.004) 19 (0.0011) 6.32 (0.0004) 1.6 (0.0001) BK_MC.jpg
CCl₄ 26 1,730 0[D] 102 (0.01) 93 (0.012) 85.8 (0.0146) 78 (0.0129) Hats_ccl4_global.png
HFC-23 222 12,400 0 14 (0.002) 18 (0.0033) 24 (0.0043) 32.4 (0.0062) HFC-23_mm.png
HFC-32 5.2 677 0 4.92 (0.0005) 20 (0.0022) BK_HFC32.jpg
HFC-125 28.2 3,170 0 3.7 (0.0009) 9.58 (0.0022) 29.4 (0.0069) HFC125_concentration.jpg
HFC-134a 13.4 1,300 0 7.5 (0.001) 35 (0.0055) 62.7 (0.0100) 107.6 (0.018) HFC-134a_mm.png
HFC-143a 47.1 4,800 0 12.0 (0.0019) 24 (0.0040) HFC143a_concentration.jpg
HFC-152a 1.5 138 0 0.5 (0.0000) 3.9 (0.0004) 6.4 (0.0006) 7.1 (0.0007) HFC152a_concentration.jpg
CF₄ (PFC-14) 50,000 6,630 40[63][E] 80 (0.003) 74 (0.0034) 79 (0.0040) 85.5 (0.0051) Tetrafluoromethane_concentration.jpg
C₂F₆ (PFC-116) 10,000 11,100 3 (0.001) 2.9 (0.0008) 4.16 (0.0010) 4.85 (0.0013) Hexafluoroethane_concentration.jpg
SF₆ 3,200 23,500 0.01[63] 4.2 (0.002) 5.6 (0.0029) 7.28 (0.0041) 9.95 (0.0056) Sulfur_Hexafluoride_concentration.png
SO₂F₂ 36 4,090 0 1.71 (0.0003) 2.5 (0.0005) SO2F2_mm.png
NF₃ 500 16,100 0 0.9 (0.0002) 2.05 (0.0004) Nitrogen_Trifluoride_concentration.jpg

Note: Values in parentheses represent the radiative forcing in W/m². ppt = parts per trillion; ppm = parts per million; ppb = parts per billion.

Radiative Forcing

Balancing Energy Flows

Radiative forcing quantifies the impact of external factors on Earth's energy balance, measured in watts per square meter (W/m²). An increase in greenhouse gas concentrations results in positive radiative forcing, indicating more incoming energy than outgoing energy, which leads to warming. Conversely, factors like aerosols can exert negative radiative forcing, causing cooling.[19][27]

Impact on Atmospheric Layers

While GHGs warm the lower atmosphere (troposphere), they simultaneously cause cooling and contraction in the upper atmosphere (stratosphere). This occurs because heat re-emitted by GHGs at higher altitudes escapes more readily into space due to the lower density of atmospheric molecules.[30]

Contributions to the Greenhouse Effect

Quantifying Impact

Estimates of the contribution of various components to the total greenhouse effect vary slightly depending on the methodology and inclusion of factors like clouds. Water vapor and clouds together account for a significant portion of the total effect, while carbon dioxide is the next most significant contributor. Other gases like tropospheric ozone, methane, and nitrous oxide also play important roles.[32][33]

Comparative Contributions Table

The table below illustrates the estimated percentage contributions to the total greenhouse effect, differentiating between clear sky and cloudy conditions, based on different scientific assessments.

Percent contribution to total greenhouse effect
K&T (1997)[32] Schmidt (2010)[33]
Contributor Clear Sky With Clouds Clear Sky With Clouds
Water vapor 60 41 67 50
Clouds 31 25
CO₂ 26 18 24 19
Tropospheric O₃ 8
N₂O + CH₄ 6
Other 9 9 7

K&T (1997) used 353 ppm CO₂ and calculated 125 W/m² total clear-sky greenhouse effect; relied on single atmospheric profile and cloud model. "With Clouds" percentages are from Schmidt (2010) interpretation of K&T (1997).
Schmidt (2010) used 1980 climatology with 339 ppm CO₂ and 155 W/m² total greenhouse effect; accounted for temporal and 3-D spatial distribution of absorbers.

Monitoring and Data Networks

Measuring Atmospheric Concentrations

The monitoring of greenhouse gases involves direct measurement of atmospheric concentrations and indirect calculation of emissions. Techniques include infrared analysis and manometry for CO₂, and specialized instruments like differential absorption lidar (DIAL) for methane and nitrous oxide. Satellite missions, such as the Orbiting Carbon Observatory (OCO), and ground-based networks like the Integrated Carbon Observation System (ICOS) provide crucial data.[76][58]

Annual Greenhouse Gas Index (AGGI)

The Annual Greenhouse Gas Index (AGGI), developed by NOAA, tracks the cumulative radiative forcing of long-lived GHGs relative to 1990 levels. It serves as a key indicator of the ongoing commitment to climate change, reflecting the total warming influence from these gases and providing a low-uncertainty measure of societal impact.[42][78]

Sources of Greenhouse Gases

Natural vs. Anthropogenic

While natural processes maintain a relative balance in the carbon cycle over geological timescales, human activities have significantly perturbed this equilibrium. Natural sources and sinks for GHGs exist, but anthropogenic emissions, particularly since the Industrial Revolution, have led to increased atmospheric concentrations.[84][85]

Human-Caused Emissions

The primary anthropogenic source of carbon dioxide is the combustion of fossil fuels (coal, natural gas, oil) for energy production. Other significant contributors include cement manufacturing, industrial processes, and land-use changes like deforestation.[12][11] Methane emissions stem from agriculture (e.g., rice cultivation, livestock), fossil fuel extraction and transport, and waste decomposition.[13]

Mitigation Strategies

Emissions Reduction Targets

To limit global warming to 1.5°C, global greenhouse gas emissions must be drastically reduced. Scientific assessments indicate that emissions need to peak before 2025 and decline significantly thereafter, necessitating rapid, economy-wide transformations rather than incremental changes.[100]

Negative Emissions Technologies

Technologies aimed at removing GHGs from the atmosphere, known as negative emissions, are considered crucial in climate mitigation scenarios. These include bio-energy with carbon capture and storage (BECCS), direct air capture (DAC), and biochar application. Research is also exploring methods for atmospheric methane removal.[105][107]

Historical Context of Discovery

Early Scientific Understanding

In the late 19th century, scientists experimentally determined that gases like water vapor and carbon dioxide absorb infrared radiation, unlike nitrogen and oxygen. This laid the groundwork for understanding their role in regulating Earth's temperature. The term "greenhouse" was first applied to this phenomenon by Nils Gustaf Ekholm in 1901.[111][112]

Early Recognition of Impact

As early as 1912, scientific publications noted the potential impact of industrial activities, specifically coal consumption, on atmospheric CO₂ levels and subsequent climate change, demonstrating an early awareness of anthropogenic influence.[108] By the late 20th century, a scientific consensus emerged linking increased GHG concentrations to significant global temperature rises and broader climate system changes.[113]

Greenhouse Effects on Other Planets

Planetary Atmospheres

Greenhouse gases are present in the atmospheres of various celestial bodies, influencing their surface temperatures. Notable examples include Mars, with its thin CO₂ atmosphere, and Titan, Saturn's moon, which possesses a dense atmosphere rich in nitrogen and methane. Venus exhibits an extreme greenhouse effect due to its extremely dense CO₂ atmosphere, leading to surface temperatures hot enough to melt lead.[114]

Runaway Greenhouse Effect

While Venus serves as an example of a runaway greenhouse effect, the conditions required for such an extreme scenario (e.g., a significantly brighter sun) are not replicable through human-induced GHG emissions on Earth. The concept highlights the powerful role of atmospheric composition in determining planetary surface temperatures.[115]

Teacher's Corner

Edit and Print this course in the Wiki2Web Teacher Studio

Edit and Print Materials from this study in the wiki2web studio
Click here to open the "Greenhouse Gas" Wiki2Web Studio curriculum kit

Use the free Wiki2web Studio to generate printable flashcards, worksheets, exams, and export your materials as a web page or an interactive game.

True or False?

Test Your Knowledge!

Gamer's Corner

Are you ready for the Wiki2Web Clarity Challenge?

Learn about greenhouse_gas while playing the wiki2web Clarity Challenge game.
Unlock the mystery image and prove your knowledge by earning trophies. This simple game is addictively fun and is a great way to learn!

Play now

Explore More Topics

Discover other topics to study!

                                        

References

References

  1.  Mole fractions: μmol/mol = ppm = parts per million (106); nmol/mol = ppb = parts per billion (109); pmol/mol = ppt = parts per trillion (1012).
  2.  Figure is combined total natural abundance of all perfluorocarbons: no data exist for individual compounds.
  3.  RAMCES webpage
A full list of references for this article are available at the Greenhouse gas Wikipedia page

Feedback & Support

To report an issue with this page, or to find out ways to support the mission, please click here.

Disclaimer

Important Notice

This content has been generated by an Artificial Intelligence model and is intended for educational and informational purposes only. The information presented is derived from publicly available data, primarily Wikipedia, and may not represent the most current or exhaustive scientific understanding.

This is not scientific advice. The information provided herein should not be considered a substitute for professional consultation with atmospheric scientists, climate experts, or relevant authorities. Always consult qualified professionals for accurate and up-to-date information regarding climate science and policy.

The creators of this page are not responsible for any errors, omissions, or actions taken based on the information provided.