This is a visual explainer based on the Wikipedia article on the IUCN Red List. Read the full source article here. (opens in new tab)

Guardians of Biodiversity

An authoritative assessment of global species conservation status and extinction risk.

Understanding Status ๐Ÿ‘‡ Explore Categories ๐Ÿท๏ธ

Dive in with Flashcard Learning!


When you are ready...
๐ŸŽฎ Play the Wiki2Web Clarity Challenge Game๐ŸŽฎ

Conservation Status

The IUCN Red List

The International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN) Red List of Threatened Species, established in 1964, serves as a comprehensive inventory cataloging the global conservation status and extinction risk of biological species. It is complemented by Regional Red Lists that assess extinction risks within specific political or geographical boundaries.[1]

Core Objectives

The primary objectives of the Red List are to provide scientifically rigorous information on species status, highlight the severity of biodiversity threats, inform policy and decision-making processes at national and international levels, and guide conservation actions.[2]

Collaborative Assessment

Major species assessments are conducted by organizations such as BirdLife International, the Institute of Zoology (Zoological Society of London), the World Conservation Monitoring Centre, and numerous Specialist Groups within the IUCN Species Survival Commission (SSC). These collaborative efforts account for a significant portion of the species evaluated on the Red List.[3]

Re-evaluation Cycle

The IUCN endeavors to re-evaluate the conservation status of each species at least every ten years, with a preference for a five-year cycle where feasible. This process is conducted through peer review, typically managed by the IUCN Species Survival Commission Specialist Groups, which act as Red List Authorities (RLAs) responsible for specific taxa or regions.[3]

Current Scope

As of recent assessments, a substantial number of species have been evaluated. For instance, in 2023, over 150,000 species were surveyed, with a significant proportion, approximately 42,108, identified as being at risk of extinction due to anthropogenic factors like overfishing, hunting, and land development.[5][6]

Conservation Categories

Extinct Categories

These categories denote species that are no longer extant or are critically endangered in the wild.

  • Extinct (EX): No reasonable doubt that the species is extinct.
  • Extinct in the Wild (EW): Survives only in captivity or outside its native range.

Threatened Categories

Species facing a very high risk of extinction in the wild, meeting specific quantitative criteria.

  • Critically Endangered (CR): Extremely high risk of extinction in the wild.
  • Endangered (EN): Very high risk of extinction in the wild.
  • Vulnerable (VU): High risk of extinction in the wild.

Collectively, these three categories are referred to as "Threatened" species.[24]

Lower Risk & Data Deficient

Species that are not currently threatened but may be at risk in the future, or those for which insufficient data exists.

  • Near Threatened (NT): Close to qualifying for a threatened category.
  • Least Concern (LC): Widespread and abundant.
  • Data Deficient (DD): Inadequate information to assess risk.
  • Not Evaluated (NE): Has not yet been assessed.

Older frameworks included "Conservation Dependent" (CD) and "Lower Risk" (LR) subcategories.[23]

Historical Development

Early Concepts

The foundational concept for a Red Data Book was proposed by Sir Peter Scott in 1963. The initial Red Lists, published from 1966 to 1977, were designed for specialists and issued in a flexible loose-leaf format. Early volumes covered mammals, birds, reptiles, amphibians, and flowering plants.[7][8][9][10][11][12]

Public Awareness

An early attempt to reach a broader audience was the 1969 publication, The Red Book: Wildlife in Danger. This volume provided a more accessible overview of threatened species across various groups.[13]

Key Milestones

Significant updates and releases have marked the Red List's evolution:

  • 2006: Evaluation of over 40,000 species.[14]
  • 2007: Upgraded status for gorillas and orangutans, highlighting primate endangerment.[15]
  • 2008: Confirmed a global mammal extinction crisis.[16]
  • 2012: Released at Rio+20, adding nearly 2,000 species and noting declining conservation status for many.[17][18][19]

Critiques and Refinements

Data Transparency

In 1997, the IUCN Red List faced criticism regarding the perceived lack of transparency and documentation surrounding its data sources. This spurred efforts within the IUCN to enhance data quality, improve documentation practices, and incorporate more rigorous peer-review processes for taxa assessments.[31]

Potential Misuse

A 2002 article in Trends in Ecology & Evolution suggested that the Red List, along with similar initiatives, could be susceptible to misuse by governmental and other entities, potentially leading to the drawing of inappropriate conclusions about environmental states or influencing resource exploitation.[33]

Methodological Concerns

A 2016 study published in Science Advances highlighted significant inconsistencies in species classification methods employed by the IUCN. The researchers argued that the categorization process was potentially outdated and could be improved by integrating readily available geospatial data, such as satellite and aerial imagery, which might lead to reclassifying more species into higher risk categories.[34]

List Versions

Evolution of Categories

The IUCN Red List has undergone several revisions to refine its categories and criteria for assessing extinction risk. Key versions include:

  • Version 1.0 (1991)
  • Version 2.0 (1992)
  • Version 2.1 (1993)
  • Version 2.2 (1994)
  • Version 2.3 (1994)
  • Version 3.0 (1999)
  • Version 3.1 (2001)

Since 2001, all new assessments have utilized Version 3.1 of the categories and criteria.[29][30]

Category Distribution

Visualizations of the Red List data illustrate the distribution of species across different threat levels. For example, the 2023 data indicates that a substantial percentage of assessed species fall into threatened categories, underscoring the ongoing biodiversity crisis.[5]

Teacher's Corner

Edit and Print this course in the Wiki2Web Teacher Studio

Edit and Print Materials from this study in the wiki2web studio
Click here to open the "Iucn Red List" Wiki2Web Studio curriculum kit

Use the free Wiki2web Studio to generate printable flashcards, worksheets, exams, and export your materials as a web page or an interactive game.

True or False?

Test Your Knowledge!

Gamer's Corner

Are you ready for the Wiki2Web Clarity Challenge?

Learn about iucn_red_list while playing the wiki2web Clarity Challenge game.
Unlock the mystery image and prove your knowledge by earning trophies. This simple game is addictively fun and is a great way to learn!

Play now

Explore More Topics

Discover other topics to study!

                                        

References

References

  1.  CITES (Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora), Joint Meeting of the Animals and Plants Committees, Shepherdstown (United States of America), 7รขย€ย“9 December 2000, Retrieved 14 November 2012.
A full list of references for this article are available at the IUCN Red List Wikipedia page

Feedback & Support

To report an issue with this page, or to find out ways to support the mission, please click here.

Academic Disclaimer

Important Notice

This content has been generated by an Artificial Intelligence model for educational purposes, drawing upon publicly available data from Wikipedia. While efforts have been made to ensure accuracy and comprehensiveness, the information represents a snapshot and may not be entirely exhaustive or current.

This is not professional conservation advice. The information provided herein is not a substitute for expert consultation with conservation biologists, ecologists, or relevant authorities. Always consult official IUCN documentation and qualified professionals for specific conservation planning or assessment needs.

The creators of this educational resource are not liable for any errors, omissions, or actions taken based on the information presented.