Measuring Flourishing: The OECD Better Life Index Unveiled
An analytical exploration into multi-dimensional well-being indicators across nations, beyond traditional economic metrics.
Explore Index 👇 View Rankings 📈Dive in with Flashcard Learning!
🎮 Play the Wiki2Web Clarity Challenge Game🎮
Introduction to the Index
Beyond Traditional Metrics
The OECD Better Life Index (BLI), launched in May 2011 by the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, represents a pioneering effort to develop economic indicators that comprehensively capture the multifaceted dimensions of economic and social progress. This initiative moves beyond conventional macroeconomic statistics like Gross Domestic Product (GDP), which often fail to provide a holistic view of people's current and future well-being.
Origins and Rationale
The BLI emerged from the broader OECD Better Life Initiative, established in 2011. This initiative was a direct response to the recommendations of the Stiglitz-Sen-Fitoussi Commission, which highlighted the limitations of GDP in reflecting true societal well-being. The core objective is to foster a "beyond growth" approach to economic progress, focusing on key areas such as environmental sustainability, enhanced well-being, reduced inequality, and robust systems resilience.
Citizen Engagement & Policy Influence
A distinctive feature of the BLI is its interactive online tool, "Your Better Life Index." This platform empowers citizens to personalize their own well-being index by ranking 11 key indicators according to their personal importance. Users are encouraged to share and discuss their customized indexes, fostering a dialogue between the public and policymakers. The aggregated user data informs the bi-annual "How's Life? Well-being" report, influencing governments to integrate citizen well-being into their policy-making frameworks.
Methodology & Calculation
Structure of the Index
First published on May 24, 2011, the OECD Better Life Index is constructed around 11 fundamental topics of well-being. Each of these topics is further composed of one to four individual indices. This multi-layered structure allows for a nuanced assessment, with the specific indices being refined over time as new data and insights become available from previous years' collections.
User-Defined Weighting
Initially, all 11 topics are assigned equal weighting to generate baseline scores and country rankings. However, the interactive tool allows users to create a personalized economic index by assigning a score from 0 (not important) to 5 (very important) to each topic. These user scores are then transformed into a percentage weighting using the following formula, ensuring the sum of all weights totals 100%:
Topic Score
--------------------
∑ (All Topic Scores)
Normalization & Aggregation
To ensure comparability, individual measures within each topic, which may be expressed in various units (e.g., percent, currency, years), are normalized to a score (χ) between 0 and 1. For indicators where a lower value is more desirable (e.g., unemployment), the score is inverted (1-χ). The total score for a given topic is then calculated by summing the normalized scores of its constituent measures and dividing by the total number of measures for that topic. For instance, a country's Health score is derived as:
(Life Expectancy Score + Self-reported Health Score)
---------------------------------------------------
2
The 11 Pillars of Well-being
Housing
Evaluates housing conditions and expenditures, including factors such as real estate pricing and access to adequate living spaces.
Income
Measures household income after taxes and transfers, alongside net financial wealth, reflecting economic security.
Jobs
Assesses earnings, job security, and unemployment rates, indicating labor market health and individual stability.
Community
Reflects the quality and strength of social support networks available to individuals within a country.
Education
Examines educational attainment and the outcomes derived from it, including cognitive skills of students.
Environment
Focuses on the quality of the natural environment, encompassing aspects related to environmental health and sustainability.
Civic
Measures citizen involvement in democratic processes and public life, formerly known as "Governance."
Health
Includes indicators such as life expectancy and self-reported health status, reflecting overall population health.
Satisfaction
Gauges the general level of happiness and contentment reported by individuals within a country.
Safety
Analyzes murder and assault rates, providing insight into personal security and public safety.
Work-Life
Evaluates the balance between professional responsibilities and personal life, including leisure time and family commitments.
Evolution of the Index
Key Updates in 2012
In 2012, the OECD relaunched the Better Life Index with significant enhancements to its framework. These updates included the introduction of new indicators specifically addressing inequality and gender disparities. Furthermore, the rankings were expanded to include Brazil and Russia, broadening the global scope of the index. Several existing indicators were either removed or updated to improve relevance and accuracy.
Renamed & Refined Categories
As part of the 2012 overhaul, the "Governance" topic was thoughtfully renamed to "Civic engagement" to better reflect its focus on citizen participation. The "employment rate of women with children" was replaced by a more comprehensive integration of gender information within the broader employment data. Additionally, "students' reading skills" was expanded to "students' cognitive skills," encompassing reading, mathematics, and sciences, to provide a more holistic view of educational outcomes.
Data Comparability & Reporting
It is important to note that the methodology of the Better Life Index is continuously fine-tuned, meaning the index is not yet directly comparable over extended periods. For a longitudinal perspective on well-being trends, the OECD advises consulting the "How's Life - Well-being database." The findings from the BLI, including over 80 indicators and detailed socio-economic data, are regularly compiled and reported in the bi-annual publication, "How's Life? Well-being."
Current Rankings (2020)
The following table presents the 2020 rankings for various countries across the 11 well-being topics, assuming an equal weighting of 1 for each topic. These scores are derived from the individual indices that comprise each topic group.
| Overall Rank | Country | Housing | Income | Jobs | Community | Education | Environment | Civic | Health | Satisfaction | Safety | Work-Life |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Norway | |||||||||||
| 2 | Australia | |||||||||||
| 3 | Iceland | |||||||||||
| 4 | Canada | |||||||||||
| 5 | Denmark | |||||||||||
| 6 | Switzerland | |||||||||||
| 7 | Finland | |||||||||||
| 8 | Netherlands | |||||||||||
| 9 | Sweden | |||||||||||
| 10 | United States | |||||||||||
| 11 | Luxembourg | |||||||||||
| 12 | New Zealand | |||||||||||
| 13 | Belgium | |||||||||||
| 14 | United Kingdom | |||||||||||
| 15 | Germany | |||||||||||
| 16 | Ireland | |||||||||||
| 17 | Austria | |||||||||||
| 18 | France | |||||||||||
| 19 | Spain | |||||||||||
| 20 | Slovenia | |||||||||||
| 21 | Estonia | |||||||||||
| 22 | Czech Republic | |||||||||||
| 23 | Israel | |||||||||||
| 24 | Italy | |||||||||||
| 25 | Japan | |||||||||||
| 26 | Slovakia | |||||||||||
| 27 | Poland | |||||||||||
| 28 | Lithuania | |||||||||||
| 29 | Portugal | |||||||||||
| 30 | South Korea | |||||||||||
| 31 | Hungary | |||||||||||
| 32 | Latvia | |||||||||||
| 33 | Russia | |||||||||||
| 34 | Chile | |||||||||||
| 35 | Brazil | |||||||||||
| 36 | Greece | |||||||||||
| 37 | Turkey | |||||||||||
| 38 | Colombia | |||||||||||
| 39 | Mexico | |||||||||||
| 40 | South Africa |
Key Findings (2020)
General Trends in Well-being
The fourth edition of the "How's Life?" report, released in 2020, reveals several overarching trends across OECD countries. Since 2010, there has been a notable increase in life expectancy, averaging more than one year. Concurrently, the average homicide rate has declined, contributing to a general increase in feelings of safety among populations. Both income and job opportunities have seen an upward trajectory over the past decade, and overall life satisfaction has improved since 2013.
Persistent Challenges & Disparities
Despite these positive trends, the report highlights significant disparities and persistent challenges. Nearly 40% of households across OECD countries face financial insecurity, and 12% of the population lives in relative income poverty. The number of individuals reporting difficulties in making ends meet has almost doubled since 2010. Furthermore, there is a concerning decline in social engagement, with people spending approximately half an hour less per week with friends and family compared to 2010, and one in eleven individuals reporting no reliable social support network.
Emotional Well-being & Catch-up Dynamics
Emotional well-being also presents a mixed picture, with 12% of men and 15% of women reporting more negative than positive feelings on a typical day. While overall life satisfaction has improved, 7% of people across OECD countries still report very low levels of satisfaction. The report also notes that countries showing the most significant improvements in well-being tend to be those that initially had weaker indicators, primarily concentrated in Eastern Europe, suggesting a "catching up" dynamic. Interestingly, improved well-being does not always correlate directly with increased GDP.
Addressing Inequalities
Disparities Across Demographics
The "How's Life?" report meticulously details various forms of inequality, examining differences based on gender, age, education level, and the performance gap between the top and bottom segments of well-being outcomes. Income inequality has remained largely unchanged since 2010, with the wealthiest 20% of the population earning six times more than the poorest 20%.
Gender-Specific Gaps
Gender disparities remain a significant concern. Women, on average, report stronger social connections than men. However, they earn 13% less than their male counterparts and dedicate an additional half-hour per day to both paid and unpaid work. These findings underscore the persistent challenges in achieving gender equity across various dimensions of well-being.
Equality and Overall Well-being
A crucial insight from the report is the strong correlation between higher levels of overall well-being and greater societal equality. Countries that demonstrate more equitable distributions across income, gender, and other socio-economic indicators tend to exhibit superior well-being outcomes for their citizens. This highlights the importance of addressing inequalities as a fundamental component of fostering a better life for all.
Teacher's Corner
Edit and Print this course in the Wiki2Web Teacher Studio
Click here to open the "Oecd Better Life Index" Wiki2Web Studio curriculum kit
Use the free Wiki2web Studio to generate printable flashcards, worksheets, exams, and export your materials as a web page or an interactive game.
True or False?
Test Your Knowledge!
Gamer's Corner
Are you ready for the Wiki2Web Clarity Challenge?
Unlock the mystery image and prove your knowledge by earning trophies. This simple game is addictively fun and is a great way to learn!
Play now
References
References
Feedback & Support
To report an issue with this page, or to find out ways to support the mission, please click here.
Disclaimer
Important Notice
This page was generated by an Artificial Intelligence and is intended for informational and educational purposes only. The content is based on a snapshot of publicly available data from Wikipedia and may not be entirely accurate, complete, or up-to-date. The information presented here should be considered a starting point for further academic inquiry and not a definitive source for policy decisions or economic analysis.
This is not professional financial or policy advice. The information provided on this website is not a substitute for professional economic analysis, policy consultation, or financial guidance. Always refer to official OECD publications, academic research, and consult with qualified professionals for specific research, policy development, or financial planning needs. Never disregard professional advice because of something you have read on this website.
The creators of this page are not responsible for any errors or omissions, or for any actions taken based on the information provided herein.