What is the primary focus of the concept of Pramana?

The core focus of Pramana is on understanding how correct knowledge is acquired, how one knows what they know, how one distinguishes knowing from not knowing, and the extent to which knowledge about a subject can be obtained.

How many pramanas are generally accepted across different Indian philosophical systems?

While the number varies, many ancient and medieval Indian texts identify six pramanas as correct means to knowledge and truth. However, some systems accept fewer, with the Carvaka school accepting only one, and Buddhism accepting two.

What are the three pramanas that are almost universally accepted in Indian philosophy?

The three pramanas that are widely recognized across various Indian philosophical schools are perception (Pratyaksha), inference (Anumana), and testimony or the word of reliable experts (Shabda).

What are the three pramanas that are considered more contentious or debated among Indian philosophical schools?

The more debated pramanas include comparison and analogy (Upamana), postulation or derivation from circumstances (Arthapatti), and non-perception or proof from absence (Anupalabdhi).

How is the Sanskrit term Pramana etymologically derived?

The term Pramana is derived from the Sanskrit roots pra (meaning "forth" or "outward") and ma (meaning "measurement"). Combined, prama signifies correct notion or true knowledge, making Pramana the means by which this correct knowledge is acquired.

What are the three core concepts that describe the Indian view on how knowledge is gained, with Pramana being one of them?

Pramana is part of a trio that includes Pramatri (the subject or knower) and Prameya (the object or knowable). These three elements are interconnected and influence the process and outcome of gaining knowledge.

According to the Taittiriya Aranyaka, what were the four means of attaining correct knowledge mentioned?

The Taittiriya Aranyaka, dating back to approximately the 9th to 6th centuries BCE, listed four means of attaining correct knowledge: scripture or tradition (smriti), perception (pratyaksha), expert testimony or historical tradition (aitihya), and inference (anumana).

What is the definition of Pratyaksha in the context of Indian epistemology?

Pratyaksha, meaning perception, is described in Hindu texts as arising from the interaction of sensory organs with worldly objects (external perception) or from the inner sense, the mind (internal perception). It is considered a direct means of knowing.

What are the four requirements for correct perception (Pratyaksha) as identified in ancient and medieval Indian texts?

The four requirements are: direct experience by sensory organs with the object (Indriyarthasannikarsa), non-verbal communication (Avyapadesya), consistency that does not change or deceive (Avyabhichara), and definite judgment without bias or inferential mixing (Vyavasayatmika).

What does Anumana signify in Sanskrit, and what is a common example used to illustrate it?

Anumana signifies "inference" in Sanskrit. A classic example used to explain it is observing smoke and inferring the presence of fire, demonstrating how a conclusion is reached from observed facts and prior knowledge.

What are the three essential parts of the inference (Anumana) process as described in Indian philosophical texts?

The process of inference is typically explained as consisting of three parts: pratijna (the hypothesis or statement to be proven), hetu (the reason or evidence supporting the hypothesis), and drishtanta (examples that illustrate the connection between the reason and the hypothesis).

How is Upamana defined, and what is its role in acquiring knowledge?

Upamana means comparison and analogy. It serves as a means of knowledge by helping one identify or understand an unfamiliar object or concept by relating it to something already known through similarity or resemblance.

What is Arthapatti, and what is a common example used to illustrate it?

Arthapatti refers to postulation or derivation from circumstances. An example is inferring that a person who is known to be fat must eat at night if it's also known they do not eat during the day, illustrating how a conclusion is drawn from existing conditions.

What does Anupalabdhi mean, and how is it considered a valid means of knowledge?

Anupalabdhi means non-perception or negative/cognitive proof. It suggests that knowing something is absent or impossible (e.g., "there is no jug in this room") is a valid form of knowledge, contributing to understanding by confirming what is not present.

What is Shabda, and why is it considered a Pramana?

Shabda means "word" or testimony, specifically referring to the testimony of reliable experts, including sacred texts like the Vedas. It is considered a Pramana because humans often need to rely on the knowledge and experience of others to learn facts beyond their direct experience.

Which school of Indian philosophy is known for its focus on the study of Pramanas?

The Nyaya school is particularly known for its systematic study and elaboration of pramanas, with the term "Nyaya" itself often referring to the science and study of these means of knowledge.

How does the Carvaka school of thought approach the concept of Pramana?

The Carvaka school, a materialist and skeptical tradition, accepted only one pramana as valid: perception (Pratyaksha). They considered all other means of knowledge to be unreliable or prone to error.

What are the pramanas accepted by the Vaisheshika school of Hinduism?

The Vaisheshika school, which focused on atomism and categories of reality, epistemologically accepted only two pramanas: perception (Pratyaksha) and inference (Anumana).

Which Hindu philosophical schools accept perception, inference, and testimony (Shabda) as the primary means of knowledge?

The Sankhya, Yoga, Vishishtadvaita Vedanta, and Dvaita Vedanta schools of Hinduism consider these three pramanas – perception, inference, and testimony – as the essential and valid means to acquire knowledge.

What are the six pramanas accepted by the Advaita Vedanta and Bhatta Mimamsa schools of Hinduism?

These schools accept all six pramanas: Shabda (word/testimony), Pratyaksha (perception), Anumana (inference), Upamana (comparison/analogy), Arthapatti (postulation), and Anupalabdhi (non-perception/cognitive proof).

What is the Buddhist perspective on the number of valid pramanas?

Buddhism, particularly the traditions influenced by Dignaga and Dharmakirti, strictly accepts only two pramanas as valid: perception (Pratyaksha) and inference (Anumana).

How do Buddhist traditions view scriptures and the words of enlightened beings in relation to pramanas?

While primarily accepting perception and inference, Buddhism also considers scriptures, the words of the Buddha, and other "valid persons" or "valid minds" as a third source of knowledge. However, this testimony is understood as being ultimately rooted in or consistent with perception and inference.

Who are considered the two most important scholars in the development of Buddhist epistemology (Pramana)?

Dignaga and Dharmakirti are recognized as the key figures who significantly shaped and advanced the discipline of Buddhist logic and epistemology, particularly concerning the concept of pramana.

What is the concept of Apoha in Buddhist logic, and what does it explain?

Apoha, introduced by Dignaga, is a theory that explains how the mind recognizes objects by comparing and negating known objects. It posits that generalities are mental constructs based on differences from other things, rather than inherent universal truths.

How did the Madhyamaka school, particularly Bhavaviveka, incorporate logic into its philosophical framework?

Bhavaviveka, a proponent of the Svātantrika approach, integrated logical arguments and epistemological reasoning into the Madhyamaka philosophy, using them to analyze and debate the nature of reality, even while maintaining a Middle Way perspective.

What is the difference in the acceptance of pramanas between the Nyaya school and the Vaisheshika school?

While both are Hindu schools, Nyaya accepts four pramanas (perception, inference, comparison, word), whereas Vaisheshika accepts only two (perception, inference).

What is the significance of Yukti in relation to Pramana in some Indian philosophical texts?

Yukti, meaning active application of epistemology or reasoning, is discussed alongside Pramana. Yukti is seen as the active process of gaining knowledge, contrasting with the more passive observation or perception that Pramana might entail.

What is the role of Shabda as a pramana, and what is the main point of contention regarding its validity?

Shabda, or testimony, is considered a valid means of knowledge because humans rely on others for information. The debate centers on how to establish the reliability of the source of testimony, with some schools rejecting it entirely.

What does the term Pramatri represent in the context of the three core concepts of knowledge acquisition?

Pramatri is the Sanskrit term for the subject or the knower, representing the individual who is engaged in the process of acquiring knowledge.

What does the term Prameya refer to in the context of Indian epistemology?

Prameya is the Sanskrit term for the object of knowledge, or the knowable. It is what is being investigated or understood through the means of knowledge.

What is the difference between Laukika and Alaukika perception in the Nyaya school?

Laukika (ordinary) perception involves the standard interaction of the five senses with objects. Alaukika (extraordinary) perception includes more unusual forms like perceiving generality from a particular, perceiving prior states, or yogic perception of past/present/future.

What are the two modes of perception described in the Nyaya school's epistemology?

The two modes are Nirvikalpa, which is indeterminate perception (just perceiving an object without identifying its features), and Savikalpa, which is determinate perception (clearly knowing the object's features).

What is the role of Sapaksha and Vipaksha in the context of Anumana (inference)?

Sapaksha refers to positive examples that support an inference, while Vipaksha refers to negative examples or counter-evidence. The validity of an inference often depends on the presence of Sapaksha and the absence of Vipaksha.

What is the primary argument against Arthapatti (postulation) by some Indian philosophical schools?

Schools that reject Arthapatti argue that it is either redundant, as its conclusions can be derived from other pramanas like inference, or that it is inherently unreliable because circumstantial evidence can be misinterpreted or incomplete.

What is the core idea behind Anupalabdhi (non-perception) as a pramana?

Anupalabdhi posits that the knowledge of absence or non-existence is a valid form of knowledge. It expands understanding by confirming what is not present, which can be as informative as knowing what is present.

What is the significance of Vaidika versus Laukika Shabda in the Nyaya school's acceptance of testimony as a pramana?

Vaidika Shabda refers to the testimony found in the sacred Vedas, considered authoritative. Laukika Shabda refers to the testimony of trustworthy human beings, which is also accepted if the source is deemed reliable.

How did Dignaga's work, the Pramana-samuccaya, influence Buddhist epistemology?

Dignaga's Pramana-samuccaya was a foundational text that significantly shaped the discipline of epistemology in Buddhism, integrating logical discourse and establishing key concepts like Apoha.

What is the main difference in the number of pramanas accepted between Hinduism and Buddhism?

Hinduism generally accepts up to six pramanas, with variations among schools, while Buddhism primarily accepts only two: perception and inference.

What is the meaning of Pramana in the context of Tibetan Buddhism, and what is its association?

In Tibetan Buddhism, Pramana (Tibetan: tshad ma) refers to valid cognition and is closely associated with the tradition of logic (rtags rigs) and epistemology (blo rigs), particularly as developed by Dignaga and Dharmakirti.

What does Ju Mipham state about the necessity of reasoning and logic in understanding the Buddha's teachings?

Ju Mipham asserted that the Buddha's doctrine must be established through reasoning and analytical investigation. He considered the claim that logic and the science of pramana are unnecessary as a harmful impediment to fully assimilating the Buddha's words.

What is the relationship between Pramana and Yukti as discussed in some Indian philosophical texts?

Yukti, representing the active application of epistemology or reasoning, is often discussed alongside Pramana. Yukti is seen as the active process of knowledge acquisition, contrasting with the more passive reception of knowledge through Pramana.

What is the core difference in the epistemological approach between the Nyaya school and the Carvaka school regarding pramanas?

The Nyaya school accepts multiple pramanas (perception, inference, comparison, word) as valid means of knowledge, emphasizing rigorous analysis. In contrast, the Carvaka school is highly skeptical, accepting only perception as a valid pramana.

What is the concept of Pratibha in relation to perception in Hindu epistemology?

Pratibha, often translated as intuition, is considered by some Hindu scholars as a form of internal perception, representing an unusual or immediate insight that goes beyond standard sensory experience.

What is the significance of Vyavasayatmika in the context of correct perception (Pratyaksha)?

Vyavasayatmika refers to the quality of definite, unbiased judgment in perception. It means that correct perception is clear, lacks doubt, and does not mix inferential judgments with direct observation.

What is the role of Smriti in the context of perception (Pratyaksha)?

Smriti, or memory, is distinguished from direct perception (anubhava). While direct perception is immediate sensory input, remembered perception refers to knowledge recalled from past sensory experiences.

What is the primary contribution of the Nyaya school to the understanding of inference (Anumana)?

The Nyaya school is credited with a detailed analysis of inference, including its structure (hypothesis, reason, example) and classification (e.g., purvavat, sheshavat, samanyatodrishta), as well as the conditions under which inference can be erroneous.

What is the meaning of Pramana in the context of the three core concepts of knowledge acquisition: Pramana, Pramatri, and Prameya?

Pramana represents the reliable means or instrument used to acquire knowledge. It is the method or source that enables the knower (Pramatri) to understand the knowable (Prameya).

What is the "Middle Way" perspective in Madhyamaka philosophy concerning the use of logic and epistemology?

The Middle Way, as interpreted by figures like Candrakirti, suggests that ultimate reality transcends conceptual thought and logic. While logic can be used to refute other systems, it is not the primary means to directly grasp ultimate truth.

What does the term "Pramana" literally mean in Sanskrit?

Pramana literally translates from Sanskrit to mean "proof" or "means of knowledge."

What are the two types of Pratyaksha (perception) mentioned in Hindu texts?

Hindu texts describe Pratyaksha as having two types: external perception, which arises from the interaction of the five senses with worldly objects, and internal perception, which is related to the mind or inner sense.

Pramana Wiki: Pramana: The Architecture of Indian Epistemological Frameworks

Dive in with Flashcard Learning!

When you are ready...
🎮 Play the Wiki2Web Clarity Challenge Game🎮

What is Pramana?

Core Concept

Pramana, derived from Sanskrit, literally translates to "proof" or "means of knowledge." It is a foundational concept in Indian epistemology, referring to the reliable and valid methods through which humans acquire accurate and true knowledge. The study of pramana addresses how knowledge is gained, the nature of knowing, and the extent to which knowledge about reality can be acquired.

Philosophical Significance

The focus of pramana lies in understanding the mechanisms of acquiring correct knowledge. It delves into the distinctions between knowing, not knowing, and the processes that lead to certainty. Different schools of Indian philosophy engage in rigorous debate regarding the number and validity of these pramanas, shaping their respective metaphysical and ontological views.

Historical Context

The concept of pramana has been a subject of extensive discussion and refinement throughout the history of Indian philosophical traditions, including Hinduism, Buddhism, and Jainism. Ancient and medieval Indian texts meticulously analyze these means of knowledge, categorizing them and debating their scope, limitations, and potential for error.

Etymology and Structure

Linguistic Roots

The Sanskrit term Pramāṇa (प्रमाण) is composed of the prefix pra (meaning "outward" or "forth") and the root mā (meaning "to measure"). The term pramā signifies "correct notion," "true knowledge," or "basis." Thus, Pramāṇa denotes that which serves as a "means of acquiring pramā," or a reliable instrument for obtaining certain knowledge.

The Triad of Knowing

Pramana is intrinsically linked to two other crucial concepts: pramātṛ (the subject or knower) and prameya (the object or knowable). These three elements—the means of knowledge, the knower, and the known—form an interconnected triad that influences the entire process of acquiring and validating knowledge within Indian philosophical systems.

The Six Pillars of Knowledge

Pratyakṣa (Perception)

Pratyakṣa refers to direct perception, involving the interaction of sensory organs with objects. It is broadly categorized into external perception (through the five senses) and internal perception (through the mind). Ancient texts detail requirements for correct perception, such as sensory organ-object contact, non-verbal understanding, consistency, and lack of bias.

Correct perception requires specific conditions: direct sensory engagement with the object, absence of hearsay or intermediate agency, consistency (not changing or being deceptive), and definiteness (lacking doubt or inferential judgment). Some traditions also discuss "unusual perception" like intuition or perception of prior states.

Anumāna (Inference)

Anumāna signifies inference, the process of reaching a new conclusion from existing observations or truths by applying reason. It typically involves a hypothesis, a reason, and examples. The validity of inference relies on establishing a necessary connection (vyāpti) between the reason and the inferred conclusion.

Inference is structured into parts like pratijñā (hypothesis), hetu (reason), and dṛṣṭānta (example). The hypothesis must be supported by positive examples (sapakṣa) and absence of negative examples (vipakṣa). The crucial element is vyāpti, ensuring the reason invariably leads to the conclusion.

Upamāna (Comparison)

Upamāna involves comparison and analogy, used to gain knowledge by relating a known object to an unknown one based on shared attributes. This method is considered valid for conditional knowledge, helping to identify unfamiliar entities through descriptive comparisons.

The process involves an upameyam (subject of comparison), an upamānam (object of comparison), and sāmānya (common attribute). For instance, describing an unfamiliar animal as "like a cow but with these differences" aids recognition. Various types of comparisons have been analyzed for their epistemological utility.

Arthāpatti (Postulation)

Arthāpatti, or postulation, is the derivation of knowledge from circumstances or implications. It involves inferring a truth based on a set of facts that would otherwise be contradictory or incomplete. This method is sometimes debated for its reliability.

A classic example is inferring that a person who is fat and does not eat during the day must eat at night. While some schools find this method valid for conditional knowledge, others argue it is either derivable from other pramanas or inherently flawed due to potential alternative explanations.

Anupalabdhi (Non-Perception)

Anupalabdhi signifies non-perception or negative proof, asserting that the knowledge of absence or non-existence is a valid means of knowing. It allows one to gain knowledge by establishing what is not the case.

This pramana is accepted by only a few Hindu schools. It posits that knowing something is absent (e.g., "there is no jug in this room") is a form of valid knowledge. It is further refined into types like termination of existence, absolute non-existence, mutual negation, and prior non-existence.

Śabda (Word/Testimony)

Śabda refers to knowledge gained from reliable testimony, whether spoken or written, from past or present experts. This includes scriptures and the teachings of trustworthy individuals. The validity hinges on the reliability of the source.

This pramana acknowledges that humans cannot directly experience all knowledge. Reliance on testimony is essential for acquiring vast amounts of information. The key debate lies in establishing the criteria for reliability, with some schools accepting Vedic testimony as paramount, while others are more skeptical.

Philosophical Schools' Acceptance

Hindu Traditions

Hindu philosophical schools exhibit varying degrees of acceptance for the pramanas. The Nyaya school is particularly known for its detailed analysis, accepting four pramanas: Pratyakṣa, Anumāna, Upamāna, and Śabda. Other schools like Sankhya, Yoga, Vishishtadvaita Vedanta, and Dvaita Vedanta generally accept these three: Pratyakṣa, Anumāna, and Śabda. Advaita Vedanta and Bhatta Mimamsa additionally accept Arthāpatti and Anupalabdhi, totaling six pramanas.

Carvaka: Accepted only Pratyakṣa (perception).

Vaiśeṣika: Accepted Pratyakṣa and Anumāna.

Sankhya, Yoga, Vishishtadvaita, Dvaita Vedanta: Accepted Pratyakṣa, Anumāna, and Śabda.

Nyaya: Accepted Pratyakṣa, Anumāna, Upamāna, and Śabda.

Prabhakara Mimamsa: Accepted Pratyakṣa, Anumāna, Śabda, Upamāna, and Arthāpatti.

Advaita Vedanta & Bhatta Mimamsa: Accepted all six: Pratyakṣa, Anumāna, Upamāna, Arthāpatti, Anupalabdhi, and Śabda.

Buddhist Traditions

Buddhist epistemology, particularly as developed by scholars like Dignāga and Dharmakīrti, primarily accepts two valid pramanas: Pratyakṣa (perception) and Anumāna (inference). While scriptures and reliable testimony (Śabda) are valued, they are often interpreted as forms of perception or inference within the Buddhist framework.

The Buddhist tradition, influenced by Dignāga and Dharmakīrti, emphasizes Pratyakṣa and Anumāna. They developed sophisticated logical systems, including the concept of Apoha (exclusion) to understand how the mind categorizes reality by differentiating objects. While acknowledging the importance of valid teachings (from "valid minds" or "valid persons"), these are ultimately subsumed under perception and inference.

Key Thinkers and Debates

Dignāga and Dharmakīrti

These influential Buddhist philosophers significantly shaped the discourse on pramana. Dignāga's Pramāṇasamuccaya and Dharmakīrti's Pramāṇavārttika are seminal works that established a rigorous logical and epistemological framework, emphasizing perception and inference and introducing concepts like Apoha.

Nyaya School's Contribution

The Nyaya school is synonymous with the study of pramana. Its scholars meticulously analyzed the nature of valid cognition, categorizing perception into ordinary and extraordinary types, and developing complex theories of inference, comparison, and testimony, including detailed discussions on potential errors and their correction.

Scholarly Disagreements

A central theme in the study of pramana is the ongoing debate among various schools regarding the validity and interdependence of these means of knowledge. Disagreements often centered on whether certain pramanas were reducible to others or whether they represented distinct, irreducible sources of valid cognition.

Teacher's Corner

Edit and Print this course in the Wiki2Web Teacher Studio

Edit and Print Materials from this study in the wiki2web studio

Click here to open the "Pramana" Wiki2Web Studio curriculum kit

Use the free Wiki2web Studio to generate printable flashcards, worksheets, exams, and export your materials as a web page or an interactive game.

True or False?

Test Your Knowledge!

Gamer's Corner

Are you ready for the Wiki2Web Clarity Challenge?

Learn about pramana while playing the wiki2web Clarity Challenge game.

Unlock the mystery image and prove your knowledge by earning trophies. This simple game is addictively fun and is a great way to learn!

Play now

Explore More Topics

Discover other topics to study!

agneau de pré-salé

2024 uefa europa conference league final

References

pramANa Sanskrit-English Dictionary, Koeln University, Germany

MM Kamal (1998), The Epistemology of the Carvaka Philosophy, Journal of Indian and Buddhist Studies, 46(2): 13-16

à¤ªà¥à¤°à¤®à¤¾ Monier-Williams Sanskrit-English Dictionary, Koeln University, Germany

pramAtR Sanskrit-English Dictionary, Koeln University, Germany

prameya Sanskrit-English Dictionary, Koeln University, Germany

yukti Monier-Williams' Sanskrit-English Dictionary, Cologne Digital Sanskrit Lexicon, Germany

A. B. Keith (1925), The Religion and Philosophy of the Veda and Upanishads, Part II, p.482

S. C. Vidyabhusana (1971). A History of Indian Logic: Ancient, Mediaeval, and Modern Schools, p.23

Matt Stefan, pratyaksha, Encyclopedia Britannica.

Monier Williams (1893), Indian Wisdom - Religious, Philosophical and Ethical Doctrines of the Hindus, Luzac & Co, London, page 61

Monier Williams (1893), Indian Wisdom - Religious, Philosophical and Ethical Doctrines of the Hindus, Luzac & Co, London, pages 457-458

Arthapatti EncyclopÃ¦dia Britannica (2012)

Anantanand Rambachan (), Accomplishing the Accomplished: The Vedas as a Source of Valid Knowledge in Sankara, University of Hawaii Press, p.29

Ramkrishna Bhattacharya (2010), What the CÄrvÄkas Originally Meant?, Journal of Indian Philosophy, 38(6): 529-542

Pramana at Hindupedia, the Hindu Encyclopedia

A full list of references for this article are available at the Pramana Wikipedia page

Feedback & Support

To report an issue with this page, or to find out ways to support the mission, please click here.

Academic Disclaimer

Important Notice

This content has been generated by an AI model for educational purposes, drawing upon publicly available data. While efforts have been made to ensure accuracy and adherence to the source material, it is intended as an introductory overview and may not encompass the full depth or nuance of the subject matter.

This is not a substitute for scholarly research. Readers are encouraged to consult primary texts and academic resources for a comprehensive understanding of Pramana and Indian epistemology. The information provided should not be considered definitive or exhaustive.

The creators of this page are not responsible for any interpretations or actions taken based on the information presented herein.

Pramana: The Architecture of Indian Epistemological Frameworks

💡 Dive in with Flashcard Learning! 💡

What is Pramana? ℹ️

🔍 Core Concept

📜 Philosophical Significance

🌍 Historical Context

Etymology and Structure 📚

🔗 Linguistic Roots

🔄 The Triad of Knowing

The Six Pillars of Knowledge 🏛️

👁️ Pratyakṣa (Perception)

💡 Anumāna (Inference)

⚖️ Upamāna (Comparison)

🤔 Arthāpatti (Postulation)

🚫 Anupalabdhi (Non-Perception)

🗣️ Śabda (Word/Testimony)

Philosophical Schools' Acceptance 🏫

🕉️ Hindu Traditions

☸️ Buddhist Traditions

Key Thinkers and Debates 🧑‍🏫

🧠 Dignāga and Dharmakīrti

⚖️ Nyaya School's Contribution

💬 Scholarly Disagreements

Teacher's Corner 🧑‍🏫

Edit and Print this course in the Wiki2Web Teacher Studio

True or False? 🤔

❓ Test Your Knowledge! ❓

Gamer's Corner 🎮

Are you ready for the Wiki2Web Clarity Challenge?

Explore More Topics

📜 Discover other topics to study!

References

📜 References

Feedback & Support 👍

To report an issue with this page, or to find out ways to support the mission, please click here.

Academic Disclaimer ⚠️

📜 Important Notice

Dive in with Flashcard Learning!

What is Pramana?

Core Concept

Philosophical Significance

Historical Context

Etymology and Structure

Linguistic Roots

The Triad of Knowing

The Six Pillars of Knowledge

Pratyakṣa (Perception)

Anumāna (Inference)

Upamāna (Comparison)

Arthāpatti (Postulation)

Anupalabdhi (Non-Perception)

Śabda (Word/Testimony)

Philosophical Schools' Acceptance

Hindu Traditions

Buddhist Traditions

Key Thinkers and Debates

Dignāga and Dharmakīrti

Nyaya School's Contribution

Scholarly Disagreements

Teacher's Corner

True or False?

Test Your Knowledge!

Gamer's Corner

Discover other topics to study!

References

Feedback & Support

Academic Disclaimer

Important Notice