This is a visual explainer based on the Wikipedia article on Pseudo-Plutarch. Read the full source article here. (opens in new tab)

The Phantom Scribes

An academic exploration into the authorship and legacy of texts falsely attributed to the venerable Plutarch, delving into their historical context and scholarly significance.

Introduction ๐Ÿ‘‡ Key Works ๐Ÿ“š

Dive in with Flashcard Learning!


When you are ready...
๐ŸŽฎ Play the Wiki2Web Clarity Challenge Game๐ŸŽฎ

Introduction: The Enigma of Authorship

Defining Pseudo-Plutarch

The designation "Pseudo-Plutarch" is a scholarly convention used to identify the unknown authors responsible for a collection of ancient texts. These works were erroneously attributed to the renowned historian and biographer Plutarch, but critical analysis has established they were not penned by him. Such misattributions are common in classical literature, often arising from attempts to lend authority or prestige to a text by associating it with a famous figure.

Inclusion in Scholarly Editions

Despite their non-Plutarchan origins, several of these pseudepigraphal works were historically included in various editions of Plutarch's corpus, particularly within the collection known as the Moralia. This practice highlights the complex textual transmission and editorial decisions made throughout history, where the distinction between genuine and attributed works was not always rigorously maintained.

The Scholarly Pursuit

Identifying the true authors or origins of these texts is a significant task in classical scholarship. Textual criticism, comparative analysis of sources, and linguistic dating are employed to understand the historical context and intellectual lineage of these writings. The study of Pseudo-Plutarch offers valuable insights into the intellectual currents and literary practices of the periods in which they were actually composed.

Notable Works Attributed to Pseudo-Plutarch

Lives of the Ten Orators

This collection presents biographies of prominent Athenian orators. Its content is believed to be derived from earlier sources, possibly including the work of Caecilius of Calacte, and shares common material with the biographical entries compiled by Photius I of Constantinople. It offers a valuable, albeit indirectly transmitted, glimpse into the rhetorical and political landscape of ancient Athens.

The Doctrines of the Philosophers

Known in Greek as Placita Philosophorum, this work compiles the philosophical views of various ancient thinkers, particularly concerning natural philosophy. It serves as a crucial repository of information on pre-Socratic and other early philosophical schools, preserving doctrines that might otherwise be lost. The writer likely depended on the lost work of the Peripatetic philosopher Aetius.

De Musica (On Music)

This treatise explores the theory and practice of music in antiquity. While attributed to Plutarch, its style and content suggest a later origin. It contributes to our understanding of ancient Greek musical theory and its philosophical underpinnings.

Greek and Roman Parallel Stories (Parallela Minora)

This work presents a collection of anecdotes and stories comparing Greek and Roman figures, customs, or events. It functions as a comparative historical and cultural text, offering insights into how ancient authors viewed the relationship between these two major classical civilizations.

De fluviis (On Rivers)

Also known as About the Names of Rivers and Mountains, this text delves into the etymology and significance of geographical features, particularly rivers. It reflects an antiquarian interest common in later classical periods, seeking explanations for names and their associated myths or histories.

Other Works

Several other texts are included under the Pseudo-Plutarchan umbrella, such as Whether Fire or Water is More Useful, Pro Nobilitate (Noble Lineage), De Homero (On Homer), De Unius in Re Publica Dominatione (On the Rule of One in the Republic), and Consolatio ad Apollonium (Consolation to Apollonius). Each offers a unique perspective on philosophical, ethical, or historical themes.

Dating and Provenance

Late Antiquity Origins

The majority of works attributed to Pseudo-Plutarch are generally dated to Late Antiquity, typically spanning the 3rd to 4th centuries AD. This period follows Plutarch's own lifetime (c. 46 โ€“ c. 120 AD) by a significant margin. The linguistic style, philosophical content, and references within these texts often point towards this later era.

Specific Case Studies

Scholarly research has provided more precise dating for certain texts. For instance, the philosophical work De Fato (On Fate), found within the Moralia, is considered a 2nd-century Middle Platonic text. More recently, David Blank's research (2011) has demonstrated that Pro Nobilitate was authored by Arnoul Le Ferron (Arnoldus Ferronus) and first published in 1556, placing it firmly in the Renaissance period, far removed from Plutarch's era.

Stromateis: A Key Source

The work titled Stromateis ("Patchwork") is another significant text falsely ascribed to Plutarch. It is particularly valued by scholars as an important source for reconstructing the doctrines of Pre-Socratic philosophy, offering fragments and summaries of early Greek thinkers.

The Authorship Question

The Challenge of Identification

Pinpointing the exact authors behind the Pseudo-Plutarchan texts remains a complex challenge. Scholars analyze internal evidence, such as philosophical leanings, historical knowledge, and writing style, alongside external evidence like manuscript traditions and citations by later authors. While definitive identification is often elusive, the process reveals much about the intellectual landscape of Late Antiquity and the Renaissance.

Interconnected Sources

Many of these works draw upon and synthesize earlier sources. For example, the Lives of the Ten Orators shows dependence on figures like Caecilius of Calacte, and The Doctrines of the Philosophers relies on sources like Aetius. Understanding these inter-textual relationships is key to tracing the transmission of knowledge and the evolution of ideas.

Enduring Significance

Window into Antiquity

Despite their pseudepigraphal nature, these texts are invaluable primary sources. They provide crucial information on ancient philosophy, history, rhetoric, music, and biography that might otherwise be inaccessible. Their preservation allows scholars to reconstruct intellectual traditions and understand the reception and adaptation of classical ideas through subsequent centuries.

Authority Control Databases

The scholarly consensus on the nature and attribution of these works is reflected in international authority control databases. These systems help catalog and organize information about authors and texts, distinguishing between the genuine Plutarch and the various pseudepigraphal works attributed to him.

International Identifiers

International

ISNI: 000000051423768X

National

France (BnF data): ark:/12148/cb13197358f

Spain (BNE): datos.bne.es/resource/XX1077973

Netherlands: data.bibliotheken.nl/id/thes/p069951284

Poland: dbn.bn.org.pl/descriptor-details/9810702870905606

Other

Czech Republic (NKC): ica=jo2016919640

IdRef: 027995194

Teacher's Corner

Edit and Print this course in the Wiki2Web Teacher Studio

Edit and Print Materials from this study in the wiki2web studio
Click here to open the "Pseudo-plutarch" Wiki2Web Studio curriculum kit

Use the free Wiki2web Studio to generate printable flashcards, worksheets, exams, and export your materials as a web page or an interactive game.

True or False?

Test Your Knowledge!

Gamer's Corner

Are you ready for the Wiki2Web Clarity Challenge?

Learn about pseudo-plutarch while playing the wiki2web Clarity Challenge game.
Unlock the mystery image and prove your knowledge by earning trophies. This simple game is addictively fun and is a great way to learn!

Play now

References

References

A full list of references for this article are available at the Pseudo-Plutarch Wikipedia page

Feedback & Support

To report an issue with this page, or to find out ways to support the mission, please click here.

Academic Disclaimer

Important Notice

This page has been generated by an Artificial Intelligence, synthesizing information from publicly available academic sources, primarily Wikipedia. It is intended for educational and informational purposes only, aimed at students pursuing higher education.

This is not a substitute for scholarly research or professional academic consultation. The content reflects current understanding based on the provided source data but may not encompass all nuances or the latest scholarly debates. Always consult primary sources and peer-reviewed academic literature for comprehensive study.

The creators of this page are not responsible for any interpretations, omissions, or actions taken based on the information presented herein. Critical engagement with the material is encouraged.