This is a visual explainer based on the Wikipedia article on Samuel Chase. Read the full source article here. (opens in new tab)

Samuel Chase

A Signer of the Declaration, a Federalist Justice, and the only member of the Supreme Court to face impeachment. Uncover the story of a founder at the center of America's earliest political battles.

Who Was He? ๐Ÿ‘‡ The Impeachment Trial โš–๏ธ

Dive in with Flashcard Learning!


When you are ready...
๐ŸŽฎ Play the Wiki2Web Clarity Challenge Game๐ŸŽฎ

Early Life & Character

Formative Years

Samuel Chase was born on April 17, 1741, in Somerset County, Maryland. He was the only child of Reverend Thomas Chase, a clergyman who had immigrated to the colony, and Matilda Walker. Following his mother's death, Chase was educated at home by his father. At eighteen, he relocated to Annapolis to pursue a legal education, studying under the attorney John Hall. He was formally admitted to the bar in 1761, launching a legal practice that would set the stage for his influential and often turbulent career.

Family & Property

In 1762, Chase married Anne Baldwin, with whom he had seven children, though only four reached adulthood. After Anne's death in 1776, Chase remarried in 1784 while in England on state business. His second wife was Hannah Kilty, with whom he had two daughters. Like many prominent men of his era, Chase was a slaveholder; records indicate he owned fifteen enslaved people at the time of his death in 1811. He also began construction on the grand Chaseโ€“Lloyd House in Annapolis, now a National Historic Landmark, though he sold it before its completion.

A Fiery Reputation

Chase was known for his combative and passionate personality. His colleagues at the bar bestowed upon him the nickname "Old Bacon Face," a moniker believed to stem from his ruddy complexion or his tendency to flush when angered or excited. This temperament was evident early in his career; in 1762, he was expelled from the Forensic Club, an Annapolis debating society, for what was described as "extremely irregular and indecent" behavior. This fiery disposition would become a defining characteristic throughout his public life.

A Revolutionary Politician

Incendiary Patriot

Elected to the Maryland General Assembly in 1764, Chase quickly established himself as a leading voice against British policy. He co-founded the Anne Arundel County chapter of the Sons of Liberty with his close friend William Paca and was a fervent opponent of the 1765 Stamp Act. His aggressive stance made him a target for loyalists, who publicly decried him as a "foul-mouthed and inflaming son of discord and faction." Chase, undeterred, fired back with equal vitriol.

In a public letter dated July 18, 1766, Chase responded to attacks from prominent loyalists like Walter Dulany and George Steuart. He accused them of "vanity...pride and arrogance" and claimed their power was derived from "proprietary influence, court favour, and the wealth and influence of the tools and favourites who infest this city." This war of words cemented his reputation as a fearless and "reckless incendiary" in the cause of liberty.

Continental Congressman

Chase's influence extended to the national stage. He represented Maryland in the Continental Congress from 1774 to 1778. As a delegate, he was a signatory to two of the nation's foundational documents: the Continental Association in 1774, which established a trade boycott with Great Britain, and the United States Declaration of Independence in 1776. His commitment to the revolutionary cause placed him among the key figures advocating for a complete break from British rule.

Anti-Federalist Opposition

Despite his role as a Founding Father, Chase was not initially a supporter of the U.S. Constitution. At the 1788 Maryland Ratifying Convention, he emerged as a prominent Anti-Federalist. He argued against the new framework of government, fearing it concentrated too much power at the federal level. Although his efforts were unsuccessfulโ€”Maryland became the seventh state to ratify the Constitutionโ€”his opposition highlights the complex and evolving political philosophies of the nation's early leaders.

The Partisan Justice

Maryland's Chief Justice

After moving to Baltimore in 1786, Chase's career pivoted toward the judiciary. In 1788, he was appointed chief justice of the city's District Criminal Court. Three years later, in 1791, he ascended to the position of Chief Justice of the Maryland General Court. His decade of service in these high-level state judicial roles provided him with extensive legal experience and solidified his reputation as a formidable, if controversial, jurist.

Supreme Court Appointment

Recognizing his legal acumen, President George Washington nominated Samuel Chase as an Associate Justice of the Supreme Court of the United States on January 26, 1796. The Senate confirmed his appointment the very next day, and he was sworn into office on February 4. This appointment placed the staunch Federalist on the nation's highest court, where his judicial philosophy and partisan leanings would soon come under intense scrutiny.

Controversial Conduct

On the bench, Justice Chase's conduct often blurred the lines between judge and prosecutor. During trials under the Alien and Sedition Acts, such as that of Thomas Cooper, he was accused of acting with overt hostility toward the defendants. In another instance, he refused to discharge a grand jury in Delaware, insisting they indict a specific printer for sedition. His actions were widely seen as demonstrating a profound political bias, a perception that would ultimately lead to an unprecedented constitutional crisis.

The Impeachment Trial

Jefferson's Target

Following the contentious election of 1800, President Thomas Jefferson and his Democratic-Republican party sought to weaken the Federalist stronghold on the federal judiciary. Justice Chase became their prime target. The final catalyst was a charge Chase delivered to a Baltimore grand jury in May 1803, in which he denounced the repeal of the Judiciary Act of 1801, warning it would lead to "mobocracy." Jefferson seized on this, initiating the impeachment process by asking a congressman, "Ought the seditious and official attack... to go unpunished?"

The Articles of Impeachment

On March 12, 1804, the House of Representatives voted to impeach Justice Chase. Later that year, they adopted eight articles of impeachment. The charges did not allege corruption or high crimes in the traditional sense, but rather centered on his judicial conduct, alleging that his political bias had led him to act in a blatantly unfair and partisan manner. The articles cited his handling of the trials of John Fries and James Callender, his conduct with the New Castle grand jury, and his "intemperate and inflammatory" remarks.

The eight articles essentially accused Chase of:

  • Allowing his political bias to control his decisions.
  • Mishandling the treason trial of John Fries.
  • Behaving as a prosecutor in the libel trial of James Callender.
  • "Descending from the dignity of a judge" to act as an "informer" with a grand jury.
  • Committing procedural errors in various cases.
  • Delivering "indecent and unbecoming" political speeches from the bench.

The Senate Acquittal

The impeachment trial began in the Senate on February 9, 1805, with Vice President Aaron Burr presiding. Despite the Democratic-Republicans controlling the chamber, the prosecution failed to secure the necessary two-thirds majority for conviction on any of the articles. On March 1, 1805, the Senate voted to acquit Chase on all charges. The closest vote was 18 for conviction to 16 for acquittal on the article concerning his Baltimore grand jury charge. Chase remained on the Supreme Court, and the outcome of his trial would have profound implications for the future of the American judiciary.

Enduring Legacy

Securing Judicial Independence

The acquittal of Samuel Chase is a landmark event in American legal history. Many historians argue it established a vital precedent for judicial independence. By rejecting the notion that a judge could be removed for the "quality" of his judicial performance or for partisan reasons, the Senate set a de facto limit on the impeachment power. This ensured that judges could not be easily removed by a hostile Congress or President simply for making unpopular decisions, thereby protecting the judiciary as a co-equal branch of government.

Defining the Role of a Judge

While Chase was acquitted, his trial served as a powerful warning to the judiciary. It clarified that while judges must be independent, they are not above the norms of judicial temperament. The trial helped define the appropriate role of a judge in a criminal trial and established an expectation that judges should avoid the appearance of overt political partisanship. Since Chase, all federal judicial impeachments have been based on allegations of clear legal or ethical misconduct, not on judicial philosophy or political leanings.

Final Years

Samuel Chase continued to serve on the Supreme Court after his trial until he died of a heart attack on June 19, 1811, at the age of 70. He was buried in Old Saint Paul's Cemetery in Baltimore, the city he had called home for the latter part of his life. His name was later honored with the naming of the SS Samuel Chase, a Liberty Ship that served during World War II, a testament to his enduring, if complicated, status as a Founding Father.

Teacher's Corner

Edit and Print this course in the Wiki2Web Teacher Studio

Edit and Print Materials from this study in the wiki2web studio
Click here to open the "Samuel Chase" Wiki2Web Studio curriculum kit

Use the free Wiki2web Studio to generate printable flashcards, worksheets, exams, and export your materials as a web page or an interactive game.

True or False?

Test Your Knowledge!

Gamer's Corner

Are you ready for the Wiki2Web Clarity Challenge?

Learn about samuel_chase while playing the wiki2web Clarity Challenge game.
Unlock the mystery image and prove your knowledge by earning trophies. This simple game is addictively fun and is a great way to learn!

Play now

Explore More Topics

References

References

  1.  Rehnquist, William H. Grand Inquests: The Historic Impeachments of Justice Samuel Chase and President Andrew Johnson. Quill: 1992, p. 52.
  2.  Keith E. Whittington, "Reconstructing the Federal Judiciary: The Chase Impeachment and the Constitution," Studies in American Political Development 1995 v9#1: 55รขย€ย“116.
A full list of references for this article are available at the Samuel Chase Wikipedia page

Feedback & Support

To report an issue with this page, or to find out ways to support the mission, please click here.

Disclaimer

Important Notice

This page was generated by an Artificial Intelligence and is intended for informational and educational purposes only. The content is based on a snapshot of publicly available data from Wikipedia and may not be entirely accurate, complete, or up-to-date.

This is not professional legal or historical advice. The information provided on this website is not a substitute for scholarly research or consultation with qualified historians or legal experts. Always refer to primary sources and academic works for in-depth analysis. Never disregard professional advice because of something you have read on this website.

The creators of this page are not responsible for any errors or omissions, or for any actions taken based on the information provided herein.