Echoes of Empire: The Second Opium War
An academic exploration into the geopolitical forces, pivotal conflicts, and lasting repercussions of the mid-19th century Anglo-French intervention in Qing China.
Begin Exploration ๐ View Impact ๐Dive in with Flashcard Learning!
๐ฎ Play the Wiki2Web Clarity Challenge Game๐ฎ
Introduction
A Defining Conflict
The Second Opium War, also recognized as the Second Anglo-Chinese War or the Arrow War, represents a critical period in 19th-century global history. Fought between 1856 and 1860, this conflict pitted the combined forces of the United Kingdom and France against the Qing dynasty of China. At its core, the war was a struggle over the right to import opium into China and the broader expansion of Western commercial and diplomatic privileges.
Key Chronology & Outcome
Spanning four years and sixteen days, from October 8, 1856, to October 24, 1860, the war concluded with a decisive Allied victory. This outcome led to a second significant defeat for the Qing dynasty, compelling the forced legalization of the opium trade and further opening China to Western influence. Many Chinese officials began to perceive these conflicts not merely as traditional wars but as symptoms of an impending national crisis.
Naming Conventions
The designation "Second Opium War" highlights a primary British strategic objective: the legalization of the opium trade and the opening of all China to British merchants, alongside exemption from internal transit duties for foreign imports. Conversely, the "Arrow War" refers to the specific incident involving the cargo ship Arrow, which served as the immediate catalyst for the conflict's escalation.
Historical Context
Legacy of the First War
This conflict directly succeeded the First Opium War (1839โ1842), which concluded with the Treaty of Nanking. This earlier treaty granted Britain significant concessions, including an indemnity, extraterritoriality for its citizens, the opening of five treaty ports, and the cession of Hong Kong Island. However, these provisions ultimately failed to satisfy Britain's broader objectives for expanded trade and improved diplomatic relations with China, setting the stage for further confrontation.
Western Imperial Ambitions
The mid-1850s were marked by an accelerating pace of Western imperialism. Powers like Britain, France, the United States, and Russia shared common goals: to expand their overseas markets, establish new ports of call, and secure greater influence. Britain, leveraging its "most favoured nation" status, pressed the Qing authorities to renegotiate the Treaty of Nanking to further its interests.
China's Modern Dawn
In China, the First Opium War is widely regarded as the genesis of modern Chinese history, marking the beginning of a period often referred to as the "century of humiliation." The subsequent Second Opium War further intensified this perception, highlighting the Qing dynasty's vulnerability to external pressures and the urgent need for internal reform.
Ignition Points
The Arrow Incident (1856)
The immediate spark for the war was the seizure of the British-registered cargo ship Arrow by Qing officials in Canton on October 8, 1856. Twelve of its fourteen Chinese crew members were arrested on suspicion of piracy. Despite the ship's British registration having expired and its prior use by pirates, the British consul, Harry Parkes, vehemently protested the alleged insult to the British flag. Viceroy Ye Mingchen released nine crew members but refused to release the remaining three, escalating the diplomatic crisis.
French Missionary's Execution
France's entry into the conflict was primarily motivated by the execution of Auguste Chapdelaine, a French missionary from the Paris Foreign Missions Society, by Chinese local authorities in Guangxi province. This region was not open to foreigners at the time, and the incident provided France with a justification to join the British in seeking redress from China, as articulated by their envoy, Baron Jean-Baptiste-Louis Gros.
First Battle of Canton (1856)
Following the Arrow incident, the British initiated military action. On October 23, 1856, British forces destroyed four barrier forts. A demand for entry into Canton was made, and upon refusal, the British began bombarding the city on October 26. The Royal Navy breached the city walls on October 29, and troops entered Canton. Despite the U.S. Consul James Keenan planting the American flag on Ye Mingchen's residence, negotiations failed, leading to continued bombardment and the destruction of 23 war junks. The British eventually returned to Hong Kong on January 5, 1857.
American and Russian Involvement
Both the United States and Russia initially offered military assistance to the British and French. While Russia ultimately provided no military aid, the U.S. engaged in a minor, concurrent conflict in 1856. After a U.S. Navy steamer was shelled by the Chinese garrison at Canton, the U.S. Navy retaliated in the Battle of the Pearl River Forts, bombarding and capturing the river forts. Subsequently, an agreement for U.S. neutrality in the Second Opium War was signed with the Chinese government.
Interlude: Diplomatic Engagements
Treaties of Tianjin (1858)
The initial phase of the war concluded in June 1858 with the signing of the four Treaties of Tianjin, involving Britain, France, Russia, and the United States. These treaties aimed to expand Western access and privileges in China. Despite their signing, the Qing government initially refused to ratify them, leading to a resumption of hostilities.
Treaty of Aigun (1858)
Concurrently, on May 28, 1858, a separate Treaty of Aigun was signed between China and Russia. This agreement significantly revised the existing border between the two empires, which had been established by the Nerchinsk Treaty in 1689. Russia gained control over the left bank of the Amur River, effectively shifting the border south from the Stanovoy mountains. This territorial acquisition was further solidified by the later Convention of Peking in 1860, which granted Russia a non-freezing port on the Pacific coast, leading to the founding of Vladivostok.
The Second Campaign (1858-1860)
Battles of Taku Forts
The Qing Emperor Xianfeng's refusal to ratify the Treaties of Tianjin led to renewed hostilities, particularly around the strategically vital Taku Forts near Tianjin. General Sengge Rinchen reinforced these forts with artillery and Mongol cavalry.
The Burning of the Old Summer Palace
Following the capture of Tianjin and the arrest and torture of British and French officers, including Harry Parkes, Lord Elgin ordered a punitive measure. After a decisive victory at Baliqiao (Eight Mile Bridge) on September 21, where Sengge Rinchen's Mongol cavalry was annihilated, Anglo-French forces advanced to Beijing. The Xianfeng Emperor fled, leaving Prince Gong to negotiate. To exact revenge for the mistreatment of prisoners and to deter future such actions, Lord Elgin ordered the destruction of the Old Summer Palace (Yuanmingyuan) on October 18. The French forces declined to participate in this act. The razing of the palace, renowned for its valuable artwork and imperial property, took two days, with many accounts extending it to three days and nights, leaving behind iconic ruins.
Aftermath & Legacy
The Convention of Peking (1860)
On October 24, 1860, Prince Gong, acting on behalf of the fleeing Emperor, conceded to the Allied demands by signing the Convention of Peking. This treaty formally ratified the Treaties of Tianjin and imposed further significant concessions on the Qing Empire. Key outcomes included the permanent establishment of diplomatic presences in Beijing for Britain, France, and Russia, a concession the Qing had long resisted as it implied equality with European powers.
Qing Humiliation and Reform
The Qing army's defeat by a numerically smaller Anglo-French force, coupled with the Emperor's flight and the destruction of the Summer Palace, delivered a profound blow to the Qing Empire's prestige and authority. This period is often cited as a stark demonstration of China's vulnerability to Western military and diplomatic pressure. In response, a major modernization initiative known as the Self-Strengthening Movement was initiated, leading to various institutional reforms aimed at bolstering China's capabilities.
Opposition to the Opium Trade
The opium trade, a central issue in both Opium Wars, faced intense opposition even within Britain. William Ewart Gladstone, who would later become Prime Minister, vehemently condemned it as "most infamous and atrocious," particularly the trade between China and British India. He fiercely opposed both Opium Wars, denouncing British violence against the Chinese and expressing "dread of the judgments of God upon England for our national iniquity towards China." His personal experiences, including the effects of opium on his sister Helen, fueled his strong moral stance against the trade.
Recognitions
Campaign Medals
Both the British and French governments issued campaign medals to commemorate the service of their forces during the Second Opium War. These medals served as tangible recognitions of participation and valor in the distant Chinese campaigns.
Victoria Cross Recipients
Seven awards of the Victoria Cross, Britain's highest military decoration for valor, were bestowed for gallantry demonstrated during the Second Opium War. All these awards were specifically for actions on August 21, 1860, by soldiers of the 44th Regiment of Foot and the 67th Regiment of Foot during the Battle of Taku Forts (1860).
Participating Forces
British and Empire Regiments
A diverse array of British and Empire forces participated in the Second Opium War, reflecting the global reach of the British Empire. These included cavalry, infantry, artillery, and engineering units from across the British Isles and India.
French and US Forces
France contributed significant military assets to the Allied effort, while the United States, though officially neutral in the main conflict, had its own naval presence and engagements in the region.
Teacher's Corner
Edit and Print this course in the Wiki2Web Teacher Studio

Click here to open the "Second Opium War" Wiki2Web Studio curriculum kit
Use the free Wiki2web Studio to generate printable flashcards, worksheets, exams, and export your materials as a web page or an interactive game.
True or False?
Test Your Knowledge!
Gamer's Corner
Are you ready for the Wiki2Web Clarity Challenge?

Unlock the mystery image and prove your knowledge by earning trophies. This simple game is addictively fun and is a great way to learn!
Play now
References
References
- Frontier and Overseas Expeditions from India. Volume 6. Calcutta: Superintendent Government Printing. 1911. p.ย 446.
- Wolseley, G. J. (1862). Narrative of the War with China in 1860. London: Longman, Green, Longman, and Roberts. p.ย 1.
- Rallings, Colin; Thrasher, Michael, eds. (2000), British Electoral Facts 1832รขยย1999, Ashgate
- John Thomson 1837รขยย1921, "Chap on Hong Kong", Illustrations of China and Its People (London, 1873รขยย1874)
- E. W. R. Lumby, "Lord Elgin and the Burning of the Summer Palace." History Today (July 1960) 10#7 pp 479รขยย480.
- M'Ghee, Robert. (1862). How we got to Pekin: A Narrative of the Campaign in China of 1860, pp. 202รขยย216.
Feedback & Support
To report an issue with this page, or to find out ways to support the mission, please click here.
Disclaimer
Important Notice
This page was generated by an Artificial Intelligence and is intended for informational and educational purposes only. The content is based on a snapshot of publicly available data from Wikipedia and may not be entirely accurate, complete, or up-to-date.
This is not professional historical or political advice. The information provided on this website is not a substitute for rigorous academic research, consultation with professional historians, or expert analysis of geopolitical events. Always refer to primary sources, peer-reviewed academic literature, and consult with qualified experts for in-depth understanding and specific research needs. Never disregard professional academic guidance because of something you have read on this website.
The creators of this page are not responsible for any errors or omissions, or for any actions taken based on the information provided herein.