This is an educational resource based on the Wikipedia article on Slash-and-burn agriculture. Explore the source material here. (opens in new tab)

Terra Ignis

Understanding a fundamental, yet controversial, method of land management and cultivation.

What is it? ๐Ÿ‘‡ Explore History โณ

Dive in with Flashcard Learning!


When you are ready...
๐ŸŽฎ Play the Wiki2Web Clarity Challenge Game๐ŸŽฎ

What is Slash-and-Burn?

The Core Practice

Slash-and-burn agriculture is a form of shifting cultivation. It involves the cutting and burning of vegetation in a forest or woodland to create a field, known as a swidden. This process begins by clearing trees and woody plants, leaving the felled vegetation to dry. Typically, this occurs before the rainiest season, allowing the dried biomass to be burned. The resulting ash is rich in nutrients, fertilizing the soil and temporarily suppressing weed and pest populations.

The Cycle of Cultivation

After approximately three to five years, the productivity of a swidden typically declines due to nutrient depletion and the resurgence of weeds and pests. Farmers then abandon the field, allowing it to recover. The recovery period varies significantly by location, ranging from five years to over two decades, after which the cycle of clearing, burning, and cultivation can recommence.

Regional Nomenclature

This agricultural system is practiced globally, with different names in various regions. In Bangladesh and India, for instance, the practice is commonly referred to as jhum or jhoom cultivation. This highlights the diverse cultural adaptations and terminology associated with this ancient farming method.

Historical Context

Ancient Origins

Slash-and-burn cultivation has been practiced across the globe for millennia. Even before the advent of agriculture, hunter-gatherer societies utilized fire for land management, clearing areas to promote the growth of edible plants and to create new grazing grounds for game animals. During the Neolithic Revolution, as communities transitioned to settled agriculture, slash-and-burn became essential for clearing forested lands for crops and livestock, particularly in regions where forests dominated the landscape.

European Prehistory

In prehistoric Europe, slash-and-burn was a common practice among nomadic and semi-nomadic groups. Extended families would clear and cultivate swidden plots sequentially, moving to new areas as soil fertility diminished. This method allowed for the efficient utilization of forest resources for sustenance, forming a cornerstone of early agricultural societies.

The Methodical Process

Land Preparation

The process typically begins months before the dry season. Forests are cut down, and the resulting vegetation, or "slash," is left to dry. This dried material is then burned during the dry season, creating a layer of nutrient-rich ash.

Cultivation and Fertility

The ash-laden soil is then planted, usually at the onset of the next rainy season. Crops such as rice, maize, or cassava are commonly grown. The ash provides essential nutrients, and the burning process helps to eliminate weeds and pests. This method was historically performed using simple tools like machetes, axes, hoes, and shovels.

Land Use and Abandonment

Swidden plots are typically used by a family until the soil's fertility is exhausted, usually within three to five years. Ownership rights are then often abandoned, allowing the land to regenerate into forest. This cycle necessitates access to substantial land areas or a low population density to remain sustainable.

Ecological and Societal Implications

Sustainable Aspects

For millennia, slash-and-burn agriculture has provided millions with sustenance and income, often proving ecologically sustainable in areas with low population density. Its suitability for nutrient-poor tropical soils, such as those found in the Amazon basin, makes it one of the few viable agricultural methods in such environments. The practice, when traditional, often fosters biodiversity by creating mosaic habitats rather than large-scale monocultures.

Environmental Concerns

However, the sustainability of slash-and-burn is highly dependent on population density and the frequency of land use. Increased populations accelerate the rate of deforestation and habitat loss. When practiced too frequently, it depletes soil nutrients, increases vulnerability to erosion, and contributes to the loss of vital carbon reservoirs. It is also generally considered unsuitable for the large-scale production of cash crops.

Regional Practices

Asia

In the northeastern Indian states of Tripura, Arunachal Pradesh, Meghalaya, Mizoram, and Nagaland, as well as in the Bangladeshi districts of Rangamati, Khagrachari, Bandarban, and Sylhet, this practice is known as jhum or podu cultivation. It is often performed on forested slopes, with cleared treetops allowing sunlight to reach the land. While beneficial for soil fertilization, it can increase erosion risk. Vietnam also sees its use among rural ethnic communities.

Americas

Ancient civilizations like the Maya utilized slash-and-burn techniques. Indigenous peoples across North and South America also employed fire in their agricultural and hunting practices. In the Amazon basin, communities such as the Yanomami rely on this method due to the region's inherently poor soil quality.

Northern Europe

In Sweden, the practice is known as svedjebruk, originating from Russian techniques and spreading with Finnish migration in the 16th century. It was also adopted in Norway and brought to New Sweden in North America, becoming integral to pioneering efforts there. Finland's Telkkรคmรคki Nature Reserve demonstrates this historical farming method.

Modern Perspectives and Alternatives

Proposed Innovations

Contemporary approaches often seek to mitigate the environmental impacts of slash-and-burn. Methods like slash-and-char, which involves partially burning vegetation and incorporating the charcoal into the soil, are proposed to enhance yields and soil carbon. Projects like 'Inga alley cropping' suggest planting crops such as beans and citrus between Inga trees to improve soil fertility and reduce the need for frequent clearing.

Discouragement and Alternatives

Many development and environmental organizations advocate for transitioning away from slash-and-burn. Recommended alternatives include adopting more intensive, permanent farming methods or encouraging shifts towards higher-paying industries. Other initiatives focus on improving the productivity of existing practices through enhanced techniques and support for farmers.

Key Scholarly Works

Foundational Texts

Several scholarly works provide critical insights into slash-and-burn agriculture:

  • Conklin, H. C. (1961). "The Study of Shifting Cultivation". Current Anthropology.
  • Nesholen, Birger (1994). "Svedjebrukerne", ร˜stlandske Skogsomrรฅder.
  • Pyne, Stephen J. (1997). Vestal Fire: An Environmental History, Told Through Fire, of Europe and Europe's Encounter with the World.
  • Sawyer, Birgit; Sawyer, Peter H. (1993). Medieval Scandinavia: from Conversion to Reformation, Circa 800โ€“1500.
  • Stagg, Frank Noel (1956). East Norway and Its Frontier.

Source Citations

Reference List

  1. Britannica, Encyclopaedia. "Slash-and-burn agriculture". Encyclopaedia Britannica. 22 May 2024.
  2. EcoLogic Development Fund. "Slash and Burn Agriculture". ecologic.org.
  3. Islam, Md Shahidul. "Jhum". In Sirajul Islam and Ahmed A. Jamal (ed.). Banglapedia: National Encyclopedia of Bangladesh (Second ed.). Asiatic Society of Bangladesh. 2012.
  4. Choudhury, Sanjoy. "Jhum". Geography and You. Marchโ€“April 2010.
  5. Disha Experts. 1500+ MCQs with Explanatory Notes For Geography, Ecology & Environment. Disha Publications. 2018.
  6. Skegg, Martin. "TV highlights 27/09/2011". The Guardian. 24 September 2011.
  7. Hands, Michael. "The search for a sustainable alternative to slash-and-burn agriculture in the World's rain forests: the Guama Model and its implementation". Royal Society Open Science. 8 (2) rsos.201204. 2021.
  8. Geography.about.com. "Slash and Burn Agriculture โ€“ An Overview of Slash and Burn". Archived from the original on 2013-12-05. Retrieved 2013-06-22.
  9. Kukla, Jaroslav; Whitfeld, Timothy; Cajthaml, Tomรกลก; Baldrian, Petr; Veselรก-ล imรกฤkovรก, Hana; Novotnรฝ, Vojtฤ›ch; Frouz, Jan. "The effect of traditional slash-and-burn agriculture on soil organic matter, nutrient content, and microbiota in tropical ecosystems of Papua New Guinea". Land Degradation & Development. 30 (2): 166โ€“177. 2019.
  10. Awe, Jaime. Maya Cities and Sacred Caves. Cu bola Books. 2006.
  11. Clark J.G.D. Farming: Clearance and Cultivation II Prehistoric Europe: The Economic Basis. Cambridge. 1952.
  12. University of Georgia Libraries. "Best Management Practices for Wood Ash as Agricultural Soil Amendment". athenaeum.libs.uga.edu.
  13. EcoLogic Development Fund. "Slash and Burn Agriculture | EcoLogic Development Fund". www.ecologic.org. Retrieved 2018-01-10.
  14. Banglapedia. "Jhum". banglapedia.org.
  15. TI Trade. "The Assam Tribune Online". Assamtribune.com. 2011-01-17. Retrieved 2013-06-22.
  16. Huy, Nguyรชรฑ Vฤƒn. The Cultural Mosaic Of Ethnic Groups In Vietnam. Education Publishing House. 2001.
  17. Pyne, Stephen J. (1997). Vestal Fire: An Environmental History, Told Through Fire, of Europe and Europe's Encounter with the World.
  18. Owl, M. Y. "Yanomamo ecology, population control, and their relationship to slash and burn agriculture". California Anthropologist. 6 (2): 6โ€“20. 1976.
  19. Northern Bush. "Sviรฐna, Svedjebruk and Slash & Burn cultivation | Northern Bush". Retrieved 2020-10-12.
  20. Outdoors.fi. "Telkkรคmรคki Nature Reserve". 2013-05-14. Archived from the original on 2013-07-17. Retrieved 2013-06-22.
  21. YouTube. Video on the procedure.
  22. Biederman, L. A. "Biochar and its effects on plant productivity and nutrient cycling: a meta-analysis". GCB Bioenergy. 5 (2): 202โ€“214. 2012.
  23. Elkan, Daniel. "Fired with ambition". The Guardian. 21 April 2004.
  24. ECHOcommunity. "Inga Alley Cropping". Retrieved 2024-11-11.
  25. Kettler, . S. "Fallow enrichment of a traditional slash/mulch system in southern Costa Rica: comparisons of biomass production and crop yield". Agroforestry Systems. 35 (2): 165โ€“176. 1996.

Teacher's Corner

Edit and Print this course in the Wiki2Web Teacher Studio

Edit and Print Materials from this study in the wiki2web studio
Click here to open the "Slash-and-burn Agriculture" Wiki2Web Studio curriculum kit

Use the free Wiki2web Studio to generate printable flashcards, worksheets, exams, and export your materials as a web page or an interactive game.

True or False?

Test Your Knowledge!

Gamer's Corner

Are you ready for the Wiki2Web Clarity Challenge?

Learn about slash-and-burn_agriculture while playing the wiki2web Clarity Challenge game.
Unlock the mystery image and prove your knowledge by earning trophies. This simple game is addictively fun and is a great way to learn!

Play now

Explore More Topics

Discover other topics to study!

                                        

References

References

  1.  Clark J.G.D., 1952, Farming: Clearance and Cultivation II Prehistoric Europe: The Economic Basis, pg.s 91รขย€ย“107, Cambridge.
  2.  Video on the procedure. In: YouTube
A full list of references for this article are available at the Slash-and-burn agriculture Wikipedia page

Feedback & Support

To report an issue with this page, or to find out ways to support the mission, please click here.

Disclaimer

Important Notice

This page was generated by an Artificial Intelligence and is intended for informational and educational purposes only. The content is based on a snapshot of publicly available data from Wikipedia and may not be entirely accurate, complete, or up-to-date.

This is not agricultural or environmental advice. The information provided on this website is not a substitute for professional consultation regarding sustainable land management, agricultural practices, or environmental impact assessments. Always consult with qualified experts for specific guidance related to your needs.

The creators of this page are not responsible for any errors or omissions, or for any actions taken based on the information provided herein.