What geographical and legal zones constitute the Arctic region above the Arctic Circle?

The Arctic region above the Arctic Circle encompasses land, internal waters, territorial seas, exclusive economic zones (EEZs), and international waters. These areas are subject to the jurisdiction of the eight Arctic coastal states or governed by international law.

Which eight nations are identified as Arctic coastal states?

The eight Arctic coastal states are Canada, Denmark (via Greenland), Finland, Iceland, Norway, Russia, Sweden, and the United States. These nations have jurisdiction over their respective land, internal waters, territorial seas, and EEZs within the Arctic.

According to international law, who owns the North Pole and the surrounding Arctic Ocean?

Under international law, the North Pole and the Arctic Ocean region surrounding it are not owned by any single country. Instead, they are considered international waters, with sovereignty over adjacent maritime areas governed by international conventions like the UN Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS).

What are the three primary maritime zones defined by UNCLOS that regulate Arctic coastal states' sovereignty?

The United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS) defines three key maritime zones: the Territorial Sea (extending 12 nautical miles from the baseline, where a state exercises full sovereignty), the Contiguous Zone (extending 24 nautical miles, allowing enforcement of certain laws), and the Exclusive Economic Zone (EEZ) (extending up to 200 nautical miles, granting exclusive rights to explore and exploit resources).

What is the 'Arctic exception' provided for in Article 234 of UNCLOS?

Article 234 of UNCLOS, often called the 'Arctic exception' or 'Canadian Clause,' allows states to implement special measures to protect the local environment and prevent vessel-source pollution in areas within their EEZs that are covered with ice for most of the year. These measures must be based on scientific evidence and cannot discriminate against foreign vessels.

What areas beyond national jurisdiction are considered 'heritage of all mankind'?

Waters and the seabed not confirmed as part of an extended continental shelf beyond exclusive economic zones are considered the 'heritage of all mankind.' The exploitation of mineral resources in these areas is administered by the UN International Seabed Authority, and fisheries can only be limited by international treaty.

What is the process for a country to claim an extended continental shelf under UNCLOS?

Upon ratifying the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS), a country has a ten-year period to submit claims for an extended continental shelf. These claims must be presented to the Commission on the Limits of the Continental Shelf, supported by geological evidence, to establish exclusive rights to resources on or below the seabed in that extended area.

Which Arctic nations have initiated projects to claim extended continental shelves beyond their EEZs?

Norway, Russia, Canada, and Denmark have launched projects to establish claims for extended continental shelves beyond their 200-nautical-mile exclusive economic zones. The United States has signed but not yet ratified UNCLOS.

How did Canada initially assert its maritime boundaries northward in the Arctic?

In 1925, Canada became the first country to formally extend its maritime boundaries northward to the North Pole, based on the sector principle. This claim covered the area between 60°W and 141°W longitude, although the actual ocean distance between the Pole and Canada's northernmost land point is significant.

What was the Soviet Union's (USSR) sector claim in the Arctic?

On April 15, 1926, the Presidium of the Supreme Soviet of the USSR declared the territory between specific lines of longitude (32°04′35″E to 168°49′30″W) drawn from west of Murmansk and the eastern Chukchi Peninsula to the North Pole as Soviet territory.

How did Canada reinforce its territorial claims in the Arctic during the Cold War?

During the Cold War, Canada undertook actions such as the High Arctic relocation, moving Inuit families to the far north, partly to establish territorial presence. Additionally, a royal tour in 1970 by Queen Elizabeth II and other royals aimed to demonstrate Canada's claim to its strategic Arctic territories to the United States and the Soviet Union.

What is the basis for a state's claim to an extended continental shelf (ECS) under UNCLOS?

Under UNCLOS, states can claim an ECS extending up to 150 nautical miles beyond their 200-nautical-mile EEZ limit, or 100 nautical miles from the 2,500-meter isobath, whichever is farther. These claims must be supported by geological evidence proving the seabed is a natural prolongation of the landmass.

How do extended continental shelf claims differ from Exclusive Economic Zones (EEZs)?

While EEZs grant coastal states sovereign rights over resources in the water column and seabed within 200 nautical miles, extended continental shelf (ECS) claims, if validated, grant exclusive rights only to resources on or below the seabed beyond the 200-nautical-mile limit. ECS claims do not extend a state's rights into the water column above that extended seabed area.

What was the significance of the Russian Arktika 2007 expedition?

The Arktika 2007 expedition, utilizing MIR submersibles, was significant as it marked the first time explorers descended to the seabed at the North Pole. During this expedition, a Russian flag was planted, and samples were collected to support Russia's extended continental shelf claim, asserting that geological features like the Lomonosov and Mendeleyev Ridges are extensions of the Eurasian continent.

How did Canada respond to Russia's 2007 flag-planting expedition in the Arctic?

Canada's Foreign Affairs Minister, Peter MacKay, dismissed the Russian action as mere 'posturing,' stating that dropping a flag on the ocean floor does not change territorial claims. In response to perceived Russian assertiveness, Canada announced plans to build new Arctic patrol ships and enhance military infrastructure in the North.

What geological features does Russia cite in its extended continental shelf claims?

Russia bases its extended continental shelf claims in the Arctic on geological features such as the Lomonosov Ridge and the Mendeleyev Ridge. Moscow argues that these underwater mountain ranges are extensions of the Siberian continental shelf and, therefore, part of Russia's territory.

What is Denmark's primary argument for its extended continental shelf claim in the Arctic?

Denmark's claim is largely based on Greenland's proximity to the North Pole. Denmark argues that the Lomonosov Ridge is a natural extension of Greenland's continental shelf, supporting its claim to a significant portion of the Arctic seabed, including areas around the North Pole.

What potential economic value is associated with the Arctic due to climate change?

The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) has indicated that Arctic climate change could unlock significant economic opportunities. This includes potential riches for the shipping industry, as well as the possibility of lucrative petroleum and natural gas reserves beneath the seafloor, leading to a potential 'race' for resources.

What was the outcome of the Arctic Ocean Conference held in Ilulissat, Greenland, in 2008?

At the 2008 Arctic Ocean Conference, the five Arctic coastal states (Canada, Denmark, Norway, Russia, and the United States) announced the Ilulissat Declaration. This declaration stated that demarcation issues in the Arctic should be resolved through bilateral agreements between the involved parties.

What was the territorial dispute concerning Hans Island between Canada and Denmark?

Hans Island, located in the Nares Strait between Canada and Greenland, was the subject of a territorial dispute between Canada and Denmark. While a 1973 treaty defined maritime boundaries, it left a small gap around the island, leading to conflicting claims. This dispute was resolved in 2022 with the establishment of a land border through the island.

What is the nature of the maritime boundary dispute in the Beaufort Sea between Canada and the United States?

The maritime boundary dispute in the Beaufort Sea involves a wedge-shaped area claimed by both Canada and the United States. Canada advocates for the boundary to follow the natural prolongation principle, extending the land boundary in a straight line, while the U.S. supports the equidistance principle, a line equidistant from both coastlines.

What is the legal status dispute surrounding the Northwest Passage?

The legal status of the Northwest Passage is contested: Canada considers it internal waters, granting it full regulatory control. Conversely, the United States and most maritime nations view it as an international strait, allowing foreign vessels the right of 'transit passage' with fewer regulatory constraints.

How does Russia view the Northern Sea Route in relation to its territorial claims?

Russia considers portions of the Northern Sea Route, specifically navigational routes through waters in the Kara, Vilkitskiy, and Sannikov Straits east of Novaya Zemlya, to be within its territorial and internal waters. These straits are located within Russia's Arctic EEZ.

What is the potential economic impact of the Northern Sea Route becoming more navigable?

The Northern Sea Route, also known as the Northeast Passage, has the potential to significantly reduce shipping costs between Europe and Asia by approximately 50% if it becomes reliably navigable year-round. Projections suggest increased navigability in the coming decades due to climate change.

Which Arctic coastal states have made claims to extended continental shelves that encompass the North Pole?

Both Canada and Denmark (via Greenland) have announced plans or made claims that include the North Pole as part of their extended continental shelf claims. Russia's claim also extends towards the North Pole, based on underwater ridges.

What was the outcome of Russia's 2001 submission for an extended continental shelf claim to the UN?

In 2001, Russia submitted a claim for an extended continental shelf to the UN Commission on the Limits of the Continental Shelf (CLCS). The CLCS recommended further research and neither rejected nor accepted the proposal at that time.

What specific geological features does Russia cite to support its claim to an extended continental shelf?

Russia cites the Lomonosov Ridge and the Mendeleyev Ridge as key geological features supporting its claim to an extended continental shelf. Russia argues these features are extensions of the Eurasian continent's continental shelf.

What is the significance of the Lomonosov Ridge in Denmark's Arctic claim?

Denmark's claim to an extended continental shelf includes the Lomonosov Ridge, arguing that it is a natural prolongation of Greenland's continental shelf. This geological argument is central to Denmark's assertion of sovereign rights over seabed resources in that region.

How did the US Coast Guard icebreaker USCGC Healy contribute to the US Arctic claim efforts?

The USCGC Healy conducted expeditions in the Arctic Ocean off Alaska to map the sea floor. This mapping work is intended to determine the extent of the U.S. continental shelf north of Alaska, providing data relevant to potential extended continental shelf claims.

What is the primary resource interest driving claims in the Arctic seabed?

The primary resource interest driving territorial and extended continental shelf claims in the Arctic seabed is the potential for significant petroleum and natural gas reserves. These resources are known to exist in areas like the Barents, Kara, and Beaufort Seas.

What was the outcome of the dispute over Hans Island in 2022?

In 2022, Canada and Denmark successfully resolved their territorial dispute over Hans Island. They established a land border through the island, effectively dividing it between the two nations and ending decades of disagreement.

What are the differing principles guiding the Canada-US maritime boundary dispute in the Beaufort Sea?

Canada's position is based on the principle of natural prolongation, extending the land boundary in a straight line. The United States advocates for the equidistance principle, drawing a boundary equidistant from the respective coastlines of the two nations.

What potential impact could the opening of the Northwest Passage have on global shipping?

The potential opening of the Northwest Passage due to melting ice could significantly shorten cargo sea routes between Europe and the Far East by at least 4,000 nautical miles. This could transform international shipping and commerce if Canada's claim to it as internal waters is not universally recognized.

What is the Russian Federation's position on the navigability of the Northern Sea Route?

Russia considers parts of the Northern Sea Route to pass through its territorial and internal waters, specifically in straits like the Kara, Vilkitskiy, and Sannikov Straits. The year-round navigability of this route is projected to significantly reduce shipping costs between Europe and Asia.

What did the 2023 CLCS decision state regarding Russia's Arctic shelf claims?

In 2023, the CLCS agreed with most of Russia's claims, granting rights to delineate its continental shelf based on the Mendeleev-Alpha Rise, Podvodnikov Basin, and Lomonosov Ridge as parts of the Asian continental shelf. However, the CLCS did not recognize the Gakkel Ridge, which is contested by Denmark, as part of Russia's continental shelf.

What is the significance of the 'Arctic exception' (Article 234 of UNCLOS) for environmental protection?

Article 234 of UNCLOS allows Arctic states to implement stringent environmental regulations for vessels in ice-covered areas within their EEZs. This provision is crucial for protecting the fragile Arctic environment from potential pollution, offering stronger protections than might exist under general international maritime law.

How does Canada's claim over the Canadian Arctic Archipelago differ from the U.S. perspective?

Canada claims the waters within the Canadian Arctic Archipelago as its internal waters. The United States, however, does not recognize this claim, nor similar claims by other countries regarding Arctic archipelagic waters, and has reportedly sent submarines under the ice near Canadian islands without seeking permission.

What was the purpose of the LOMROG expeditions conducted by Denmark?

The LOMROG (Lomonosov Ridge off Greenland) expeditions, including LOMROG I and II, were conducted by Denmark as part of the 2007-2008 International Polar Year program. These expeditions aimed to gather geological data, particularly concerning the Lomonosov Ridge, to support Denmark's claim to an extended continental shelf.

What potential hydrocarbon reserves are believed to exist in the Arctic seabed?

Significant hydrocarbon reserves, including oil and natural gas, are believed to exist beneath the Arctic seafloor, particularly in areas like the Barents, Kara, and Beaufort Seas. Much of the known Arctic oil and gas resources are already located within uncontested EEZs.

What is the stated rationale behind the U.S. not ratifying UNCLOS?

While the U.S. has not ratified UNCLOS, it asserts that its rights to an extended continental shelf are established under customary international law. A key consequence of non-ratification is that the U.S. is not obligated to participate in the revenue-sharing system established by Article 82 of the convention for resources extracted from the continental shelf beyond 200 nautical miles.

What was the outcome of the 1973 treaty between Canada and Denmark regarding maritime boundaries?

The 1973 treaty between Canada and Denmark defined maritime boundaries from Davis Strait to Robeson Channel using geodesic lines between specified points. However, the treaty did not draw a line for a short segment (875 meters) between points 122 and 123, which encompassed Hans Island, leaving its ownership disputed.

What diplomatic actions did Canada take regarding Hans Island prior to the 2022 resolution?

Prior to the 2022 resolution, Canada had formally protested Denmark's actions of planting Danish flags on Hans Island in 1984, 1988, 1995, and 2003. A diplomatic quarrel also arose in 2005 when a former Canadian defense minister made an unannounced stop on the island.

What is the basis for Canada's claim to the Northwest Passage as internal waters?

Canada considers the Northwest Passage to be part of its historic internal waters. This classification grants Canada greater regulatory authority over the passage, including environmental and safety regulations, compared to the rights it would have if it were considered an international strait.

What is the primary difference in approach between Canada and the US regarding Arctic maritime boundary delimitation?

Canada's approach to Arctic maritime boundary delimitation favors the principle of natural prolongation, extending existing land boundaries. In contrast, the United States typically applies the equidistance principle, creating a boundary equidistant from the coastlines of the involved nations.

What was the purpose of the 2008 Ilulissat Declaration?

The Ilulissat Declaration, adopted by the five Arctic Ocean coastal states at the 2008 Arctic Ocean Conference, affirmed that any boundary demarcation issues in the Arctic should be resolved through bilateral negotiations between the contesting parties, emphasizing a cooperative approach to managing Arctic maritime space.

What specific areas did Norway submit claims for regarding its extended continental shelf?

Norway submitted claims for an extended continental shelf in three areas: the 'Loop Hole' in the Barents Sea, the Western Nansen Basin in the Arctic Ocean, and the 'Banana Hole' in the Norwegian Sea. These submissions aimed to extend Norwegian seabed claims beyond the 200-nautical-mile EEZ.

What was the outcome of Russia's 2015 and 2016 submissions regarding its Arctic continental shelf claim?

In 2015, Russia submitted additional data to the UN supporting its bid for an extended continental shelf, claiming 1.2 million square kilometers. In 2016, further data was submitted reinforcing claims to areas including the North Pole region. The UN Commission on the Limits of the Continental Shelf began reviewing these submissions in August 2016.

What is the significance of the 'Arctic exception' (Article 234 of UNCLOS) for environmental protection?

Article 234 of UNCLOS allows Arctic states to implement stringent environmental regulations for vessels in ice-covered areas within their EEZs. This provision is crucial for protecting the fragile Arctic environment from potential pollution, offering stronger protections than might exist under general international maritime law.

What specific geological features does Russia cite to support its claim to an extended continental shelf?

Russia cites the Lomonosov Ridge and the Mendeleyev Ridge as key geological features supporting its claim to an extended continental shelf. Russia argues these features are extensions of the Eurasian continent's continental shelf.

Territorial Claims In The Arctic Wiki: Arctic Frontiers: Navigating Sovereignty and Claims

Dive in with Flashcard Learning!

When you are ready...
🎮 Play the Wiki2Web Clarity Challenge Game🎮

Maritime Zones

Jurisdictional Overview

The Arctic region encompasses land, internal waters, territorial seas, exclusive economic zones (EEZs), and international waters north of the Arctic Circle. These areas fall under the jurisdiction of eight Arctic coastal states: Canada, Denmark (via Greenland), Finland, Iceland, Norway, Russia, Sweden, and the United States.^[1] International law, particularly the UN Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS), governs these maritime areas.

UNCLOS Maritime Zones

UNCLOS defines several maritime zones:

Territorial Sea: Extends 12 nautical miles from the baseline. Coastal states exercise full sovereignty, subject to the right of innocent passage for foreign vessels.^[3]
Contiguous Zone: Extends up to 24 nautical miles from the baseline. Allows coastal states limited enforcement rights for customs, fiscal, immigration, and sanitary laws.^[3]
Exclusive Economic Zone (EEZ): Extends up to 200 nautical miles from the baseline. Grants the coastal state exclusive rights for resource exploration and exploitation (water column and seabed).^[2]

The Arctic Exception

Article 234 of UNCLOS, often termed the "Arctic exception," allows Arctic states to implement special measures to protect the local environment and prevent vessel-source pollution in areas covered by ice for most of the year.^[5]^[6] Such measures must be based on scientific evidence and cannot discriminate against foreign vessels.

Extended Continental Shelf Claims

The UNCLOS Process

Under UNCLOS, states have a ten-year window from ratification to submit claims for an extended continental shelf beyond the 200-nautical-mile EEZ limit. These claims, based on geological evidence of seabed extension, are reviewed by the Commission on the Limits of the Continental Shelf (CLCS).^[7] Valid claims grant exclusive rights to seabed resources, but do not extend the EEZ itself.

Seabed Resource Potential

Significant petroleum and natural gas reserves are believed to exist beneath the Arctic seabed, particularly within the EEZs of Arctic nations. However, extended continental shelf claims cover much of the remaining seabed, potentially assigning rights to these resources exclusively to the coastal states.^[54]

Overlapping Claims and High Seas

While the CLCS judges the scientific validity of claims, it does not define borders. Overlapping claims necessitate bilateral settlements between states. The areas not falling under national jurisdiction are considered "high seas," administered by the International Seabed Authority for resource exploitation.^[2]

National Claims & Disputes

Canada

Canada claims Arctic sectors based on the sector principle and asserts sovereignty over the waters within the Canadian Arctic Archipelago as internal waters. It has actively pursued extended continental shelf claims, including areas around the North Pole.^[20] Disputes exist with the U.S. regarding the maritime boundary in the Beaufort Sea, based on differing interpretations of boundary delimitation principles (natural prolongation vs. equidistance).^[64] Canada and Denmark resolved their dispute over Hans Island in 2022, establishing a land border.^[63]

Denmark (Greenland)

Denmark, via Greenland, claims an extended continental shelf reaching past the North Pole, arguing the Lomonosov Ridge is a geological extension of Greenland.^[29] This claim overlaps with those of Canada and Russia.^[50] Denmark also maintains its position on the legal status of Danish Straits based on historical treaties.

Norway

Norway ratified UNCLOS and submitted claims for an extended continental shelf in the Barents Sea and the Arctic Ocean, including areas like the Western Nansen Basin. It has resolved a long-standing maritime boundary dispute with Russia in the Barents Sea.^[39]^[40]

Russia

Russia claims a vast extended continental shelf within its Arctic sector, asserting that the Lomonosov and Mendeleyev Ridges are extensions of the Siberian continental shelf.^[42] Expeditions like Arktika 2007, involving submersible descents to the North Pole seabed, provided data supporting these claims.^[44] While the CLCS recognized most of Russia's claims in 2023, it did not recognize the Gakkel Ridge area contested with Denmark.^[50]

United States

The U.S. has not ratified UNCLOS but asserts that its rights to an extended continental shelf are established under customary international law. It is conducting seabed mapping off Alaska to determine its shelf boundaries.^[51] The U.S. position on the Beaufort Sea boundary differs from Canada's, leading to a dispute over a potentially resource-rich area.^[64]

Navigational Passages

Northwest Passage

The legal status of the Northwest Passage is contested. Canada views it as internal waters, allowing for robust environmental and regulatory control. Conversely, the U.S. and many maritime nations consider it an international strait, granting rights of transit passage.^[68]^[70] Its potential opening due to climate change presents significant geopolitical and economic implications for global shipping.

Northeast Passage (Northern Sea Route)

Russia considers parts of the Northern Sea Route, east of Novaya Zemlya, to be within its territorial and internal waters. Year-round navigability, projected to increase due to climate change, could significantly reduce shipping costs between Europe and Asia.^[2]^[74]

Future Outlook

Climate Change Impact

Arctic climate change is reducing sea ice extent, potentially opening new shipping routes and increasing access to resources. This transformation presents both economic opportunities and challenges, including potential resource competition and environmental risks.^[53]

Cooperation vs. Conflict

While narratives of an "Arctic resources race" and potential conflict exist, international cooperation frameworks like the Arctic Council and declarations like the Ilulissat Declaration emphasize bilateral dispute resolution and shared governance.^[58] However, overlapping claims and strategic interests continue to shape the region's geopolitical dynamics.

References

Source Citations

"The Arctic Council". Arctic Council.
Carlson, Jon D.; Hubach, Christopher; Long, Joseph; Minteer, Kellen; Young, Shane (2013). "Scramble for the Arctic: Layered Sovereignty, UNCLOS, and Competing Maritime Territorial Claims". The SAIS Review of International Affairs. 33 (2): 21–43. ISSN 1945-4716. JSTOR 26995398.
Larkin, John E. D. (2009–2010). "UNCLOS and the Balance of Environmental and Economic Resources in the Arctic". Georgetown International Environmental Law Review. 22: 307.
Larkin, John E. D. (2009–2010). "UNCLOS and the Balance of Environmental and Economic Resources in the Arctic". Georgetown International Environmental Law Review. 22: 307.
Solski, Jan Jakub (2021-01-02). "The Genesis of Article 234 of the UNCLOS". Ocean Development & International Law. 52: 1–19. doi:10.1080/00908320.2020.1835026. hdl:10037/21803. ISSN 0090-8320.
Hossain, Kamrul (2023). "Article 234 of UNCLOS and the Arctic Prerogative for an Ice-covered Area" (PDF). Arctic Law in 1000 Words.
"United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (Annex 2, Article 4)". Retrieved 2007-07-26.
"Maritime jurisdiction and boundaries in the Arctic region" (PDF). Durham University International Boundaries Research Unit. 2008-07-24.
"Canada to claim north pole as its own". The Guardian. December 9, 2013. Retrieved 10 December 2013.
"Transnational Issues CIA World Fact Book". CIA. Retrieved 2012-01-10.
"Boundary dispute Backgrounder". Global Affairs Canada. 2022. Retrieved 14 June 2022.
"Territorial claims – The Right Arctic". Arcticcontroversy.weebly.com. Retrieved 2015-05-31.
"Russia's Arctic Shelf Bid and the Commission on the Limits of the Continental Shelf, Explained". The Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs. 2023-03-02. Retrieved 2024-12-19.
"Frequently Asked Questions-U.S. Extended Continental Shelf Project". United States Department of State. n.d. Retrieved 2 January 2023.
"Conference in Ilulissat, Greenland: Landmark political declaration on the future of the Arctic". Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Denmark. 2008-05-28.
Cornell Overfield (September 25, 2021). "Could a Kiwi Sailor's Northwest Passage Transit Break the Legal Ice Between Canada and the U.S.?". Lawfare. Retrieved 10 January 2012.
"American Economic Growth in the Information Age". ISUMA. Archived from the original on 31 January 2002. Retrieved 8 May 2015.
Chen, Jinlei; Kang, Shichang; You, Qinglong; Zhang, Yulan; Du, Wentao (2022-12-01). "Projected changes in sea ice and the navigability of the Arctic Passages under global warming of 2 °C and 3 °C". Anthropocene. 40 100349. doi:10.1016/j.ancene.2022.100349. ISSN 2213-3054.
"Continental Shelf – submission to the Commission by Norway". United Nations. Retrieved 8 May 2015.
"Evolution of Arctic Territorial Claims and Agreements: A Timeline (1903–Present)" (PDF). Henry L. Stimson Center. 15 September 2013. Accessed: 17 December 2014.
"Continental Shelf – submission to the Commission by the Russian Federation". United Nations. Retrieved 8 May 2015.
"The Battle for the Next Energy Frontier: The Russian Polar Expedition and the Future of Arctic Hydrocarbons", by Shamil Yenikeyeff and Timothy Fenton Krysiek, Oxford Institute for Energy Studies, August 2007
"Russia's Arctic Shelf Bid and the Commission on the Limits of the Continental Shelf, Explained". The Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs. 2023-03-02. Retrieved 2024-12-19.
The Edmonton Journal (9 April 2006). "Northwest Passage gets political name change". Canada.com.
"The Big Melt: A Series About the Arctic and Climate Change From The New York Times".
Larkin, John E. D. (2009–2010). "UNCLOS and the Balance of Environmental and Economic Resources in the Arctic". Georgetown International Environmental Law Review. 22: 307.
Solski, Jan Jakub (2021-01-02). "The Genesis of Article 234 of the UNCLOS". Ocean Development & International Law. 52: 1–19. doi:10.1080/00908320.2020.1835026. hdl:10037/21803. ISSN 0090-8320.
"United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (Annex 2, Article 4)". Retrieved 2007-07-26.
"Transnational Issues CIA World Fact Book". CIA. Retrieved 2012-01-10.
"Continental Shelf – submission to the Commission by the Russian Federation". United Nations. Retrieved 8 May 2015.
"Russia's Arctic Shelf Bid and the Commission on the Limits of the Continental Shelf, Explained". The Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs. 2023-03-02. Retrieved 2024-12-19.
Cornell Overfield (September 25, 2021). "Could a Kiwi Sailor's Northwest Passage Transit Break the Legal Ice Between Canada and the U.S.?". Lawfare. Retrieved 10 January 2012.
"American Economic Growth in the Information Age". ISUMA. Archived from the original on 31 January 2002. Retrieved 8 May 2015.

Teacher's Corner

Edit and Print this course in the Wiki2Web Teacher Studio

Edit and Print Materials from this study in the wiki2web studio

Click here to open the "Territorial Claims In The Arctic" Wiki2Web Studio curriculum kit

Use the free Wiki2web Studio to generate printable flashcards, worksheets, exams, and export your materials as a web page or an interactive game.

True or False?

Test Your Knowledge!

Gamer's Corner

Are you ready for the Wiki2Web Clarity Challenge?

Learn about territorial_claims_in_the_arctic while playing the wiki2web Clarity Challenge game.

Unlock the mystery image and prove your knowledge by earning trophies. This simple game is addictively fun and is a great way to learn!

Play now

Explore More Topics

Discover other topics to study!

personal chef

praeneste fibula

juan bautista aznar-cabañas

list of districts of ladakh

united nations peacekeeping force in cyprus

lou cannon

References

Territorial Sea Geographical Coordinates (Area 7) Order, SOR/85-872

Michael McCormack, "More than Words: Securitization and Policymaking in the Canadian Arctic under Stephen Harper", American Review of Canadian Studies (2020) 50#4 pp 436-460.

A full list of references for this article are available at the Territorial claims in the Arctic Wikipedia page

Feedback & Support

To report an issue with this page, or to find out ways to support the mission, please click here.

Disclaimer

Important Notice

This page was generated by an Artificial Intelligence and is intended for informational and educational purposes only. The content is based on a snapshot of publicly available data from Wikipedia and may not be entirely accurate, complete, or up-to-date.

This is not legal advice. The information provided on this website pertains to international law and territorial claims, and should not be considered a substitute for professional legal consultation. Always consult with qualified legal professionals for advice regarding maritime law, international treaties, or sovereignty disputes.

The creators of this page are not responsible for any errors or omissions, or for any actions taken based on the information provided herein.

Arctic Frontiers

💡 Dive in with Flashcard Learning! 💡

Maritime Zones 🌊

🇨🇦 Jurisdictional Overview

⚖️ UNCLOS Maritime Zones

🧊 The Arctic Exception

Extended Continental Shelf Claims 🌍

📜 The UNCLOS Process

📈 Seabed Resource Potential

❓ Overlapping Claims and High Seas

National Claims & Disputes 🏛️

🇨🇦 Canada

🇩🇰 Denmark (Greenland)

🇳🇴 Norway

🇷🇺 Russia

🇺🇸 United States

Navigational Passages 🚢

➡️ Northwest Passage

↗️ Northeast Passage (Northern Sea Route)

Future Outlook 🔮

🌡️ Climate Change Impact

🤝 Cooperation vs. Conflict

References 📚

🔗 Source Citations

Teacher's Corner 🧑‍🏫

Edit and Print this course in the Wiki2Web Teacher Studio

True or False? 🤔

❓ Test Your Knowledge! ❓

Gamer's Corner 🎮

Are you ready for the Wiki2Web Clarity Challenge?

Explore More Topics

📜 Discover other topics to study!

References

📜 References

Feedback & Support 👍

To report an issue with this page, or to find out ways to support the mission, please click here.

Disclaimer ⚠️

📜 Important Notice

Dive in with Flashcard Learning!

Maritime Zones

Jurisdictional Overview

UNCLOS Maritime Zones

The Arctic Exception

Extended Continental Shelf Claims

The UNCLOS Process

Seabed Resource Potential

Overlapping Claims and High Seas

National Claims & Disputes

Canada

Denmark (Greenland)

Norway

Russia

United States

Navigational Passages

Northwest Passage

Northeast Passage (Northern Sea Route)

Future Outlook

Climate Change Impact

Cooperation vs. Conflict

References

Source Citations

Teacher's Corner

True or False?

Test Your Knowledge!

Gamer's Corner

Discover other topics to study!

References

Feedback & Support

Disclaimer

Important Notice