This is an educational exploration based on the Wikipedia article on Vedanta. Read the full source article here. (opens in new tab)

Vedanta: The Apex of Vedic Wisdom

An Exploration of the Culmination of Vedic Thought and Philosophy.

What is Vedanta? 👇 Explore Schools 🏛️

Dive in with Flashcard Learning!


When you are ready...
🎮 Play the Wiki2Web Clarity Challenge Game🎮

Introduction

Orthodox Tradition

Vedanta, meaning "the conclusion of the Vedas," is one of the six orthodox (āstika) traditions of Hindu philosophy. It encompasses the profound ideas that emerged from, or aligned with, the speculations found within the Upanishads.

Core Focus

Vedanta centers on the investigation of Brahman (the ultimate reality) and Atman (the self), exploring concepts of ontology, soteriology, and epistemology. It emphasizes devotion, knowledge, and liberation as paths to understanding the Absolute.

Global Significance

While deeply rooted in Indian tradition, Vedanta's philosophical inquiries into the nature of reality, consciousness, and existence have resonated globally, influencing diverse intellectual and spiritual traditions.

Etymology & Nomenclature

Meaning of Vedanta

The term "Vedanta" is derived from Sanskrit: वेद (Veda) meaning "sacred knowledge" and अंत (anta) meaning "end" or "conclusion." Thus, Vedanta signifies "the end of the Vedas" or "the culmination of Vedic wisdom."

Canonical Texts

Originally referring to the Upanishads, the meaning of Vedanta expanded to include interpretations of the Prasthānatrayī—the three foundational sources: the Upanishads, the Brahma Sutras, and the Bhagavad Gita.

Uttara Mimamsa

Vedanta is also known as Uttara Mimāṃsā, meaning "the latter inquiry," contrasting with Pūrva Mimāṃsā ("the former inquiry"). While Pūrva Mimāṃsā focuses on Vedic rituals, Uttara Mimāṃsā delves into the deeper philosophical and metaphysical questions.

Core Philosophy

Brahman & Atman

A central tenet across Vedanta traditions is the investigation of Brahman (the ultimate, absolute reality) and Ātman (the individual self or soul). The relationship between these two is a primary point of divergence among the schools.

Scriptural Authority

Vedanta places paramount importance on scriptural testimony (śabda) as the most reliable means of knowledge (pramāṇa) for understanding spiritual truths beyond empirical perception or logical inference.

Samsara & Moksha

All Vedanta traditions accept the concepts of rebirth (saṃsāra) and the ultimate goal of liberation (mokṣa) from the cycle of birth and death.

Metaphysical Framework

Brahman: The Absolute

Vedanta posits Brahman as the ultimate reality. Conceptions vary: from the undifferentiated, attributeless Absolute (nirguṇa Brahman) in Advaita, to the personal, attributive God (saguṇa Brahman) in theistic schools like Vishishtadvaita and Dvaita.

Ātman: The Self

The nature of the individual self (Ātman or Jīva) and its relationship to Brahman is a key differentiator. Advaita asserts their identity, while Vishishtadvaita sees a qualified non-duality, and Dvaita maintains a fundamental difference.

The World (Jagat/Prakriti)

The empirical world (Jagat or Prakriti) is viewed differently: as an illusion (Maya) in Advaita, as a real manifestation or mode of Brahman in Vishishtadvaita, or as a distinct, real entity in Dvaita.

Epistemological Foundations

Pramana: Means of Knowledge

Vedanta relies on valid means of knowledge (pramāṇa) to ascertain truth. The primary means include perception (pratyakṣa), inference (anumāna), and scriptural testimony (śabda).

Primacy of Scripture

While perception and inference are acknowledged, scriptural testimony (śruti), particularly the Upanishads, is considered the ultimate authority for understanding Brahman, as human reason alone is insufficient for comprehending the Absolute.

School Disagreements

The validity and hierarchy of these pramāṇas differ among schools. Advaita accepts six, while Vishishtadvaita and Dvaita typically accept three, with varying emphasis on the supremacy of scriptural testimony.

Major Schools of Vedanta

Advaita Vedanta

Propounded by Adi Shankara, this school emphasizes non-dualism (advaita), asserting the identity of Ātman and Brahman. The world is often viewed as Maya (illusion).

Vishishtadvaita

Championed by Ramanuja, this "qualified non-dualism" posits that Ātman and Brahman are distinct yet eternally connected, forming an organic whole. It emphasizes devotion (bhakti) to a personal God (Vishnu).

Dvaita Vedanta

Founded by Madhvacharya, this dualistic school asserts a fundamental and eternal difference between Brahman (Vishnu), the individual souls (Jivas), and the material world (Jagat).

Bhedabheda

This tradition, encompassing schools like Nimbarka's Dvaitadvaita and Chaitanya's Achintya Bheda Abheda, posits that reality is simultaneously different and non-different, reconciling seemingly contradictory Upanishadic statements.

Historical Trajectory

Early Foundations

Vedanta's roots lie in the Upanishads, the concluding philosophical sections of the Vedas. Early systematization efforts preceded Badarayana's Brahma Sutras (c. 400-450 CE), which synthesized Upanishadic thought and refuted rival philosophies.

Classical Period

The period between the Brahma Sutras and Adi Shankara (5th-8th centuries) saw the development of various schools, notably Bhedabheda. Shankara's Advaita Vedanta emerged as a highly influential synthesis.

Medieval & Modern Developments

The Bhakti movement spurred the growth of theistic Vedanta schools (Vishishtadvaita, Dvaita, etc.) from the 11th century onwards. Modern Vedanta, including Neo-Vedanta, emerged in the 19th century, reinterpreting and disseminating these philosophies globally.

Profound Influence

Within Hinduism

Vedanta has profoundly shaped Hinduism, providing the philosophical underpinnings for numerous devotional traditions (Vaishnavism, Shaivism, Shaktism) and influencing popular literature, ethics, and spiritual practices.

Global Reach

Through translations and the work of figures like Swami Vivekananda, Vedanta, particularly Advaita Vedanta, gained significant traction in the West, influencing philosophers, theologians, and spiritual seekers, fostering cross-cultural dialogue.

East-West Dialogue

Comparisons drawn between Vedanta and Western philosophies, such as Spinoza's monism, highlight its universal appeal and the shared human quest for understanding ultimate reality, consciousness, and the self.

Key Texts

The Prasthanatrayi

The foundational scriptures for all Vedanta schools are the Prasthānatrayī: the Upanishads (Śruti Prasthāna), the Brahma Sutras (Nyāya Prasthāna), and the Bhagavad Gita (Smṛti Prasthāna).

Upanishads

These ancient texts form the philosophical core of the Vedas, exploring profound questions about Brahman, Ātman, the nature of existence, and the path to liberation.

Brahma Sutras

Attributed to Badarayana, these aphorisms systematically synthesize Upanishadic teachings, providing a framework for subsequent Vedantic commentaries and debates.

Bhagavad Gita

This revered scripture, part of the Mahabharata, offers a synthesis of various philosophical paths—knowledge (jnana), action (karma), and devotion (bhakti)—within a narrative context.

Influential Teachers

Advaita Masters

Key figures include Gaudapada, Adi Shankara, and later proponents like Vidyaranya, who articulated and disseminated the non-dualistic philosophy.

Vishishtadvaita Gurus

Ramanuja, Vedanta Desika, and Nathamuni are central figures in this qualified non-dualistic tradition, emphasizing devotion to a personal God.

Dvaita Acharyas

Madhvacharya, Jayatirtha, and Vyasatirtha laid the foundation for the dualistic school, emphasizing the distinct reality of Brahman and the individual soul.

Modern Thinkers

Figures like Swami Vivekananda, Sri Aurobindo, and Sarvepalli Radhakrishnan played pivotal roles in reinterpreting and popularizing Vedanta in modern times, both in India and globally.

Core Concepts

Brahman

The ultimate, unchanging reality; the Absolute; the source and ground of all existence. Its nature is described differently across Vedanta schools.

Ātman

The individual self or soul, often considered identical to Brahman (Advaita) or distinct yet related (Vishishtadvaita, Dvaita).

Samsara

The cycle of birth, death, and rebirth, driven by karma, from which liberation (Moksha) is sought.

Karma

The law of cause and effect, where actions determine future consequences and influence one's journey through Samsara.

Moksha

Liberation from Samsara; the ultimate spiritual goal, achieved through various paths like knowledge, devotion, or right action, depending on the school.

Maya

Often translated as "illusion," Maya refers to the power that conceals the true nature of reality (Brahman) and projects the phenomenal world. Its exact nature and role are debated among schools.

Teacher's Corner

Edit and Print this course in the Wiki2Web Teacher Studio

Edit and Print Materials from this study in the wiki2web studio
Click here to open the "Vedanta" Wiki2Web Studio curriculum kit

Use the free Wiki2web Studio to generate printable flashcards, worksheets, exams, and export your materials as a web page or an interactive game.

True or False?

Test Your Knowledge!

Gamer's Corner

Are you ready for the Wiki2Web Clarity Challenge?

Learn about vedanta while playing the wiki2web Clarity Challenge game.
Unlock the mystery image and prove your knowledge by earning trophies. This simple game is addictively fun and is a great way to learn!

Play now

Explore More Topics

Discover other topics to study!

                                        

References

References

  1.  A few Indian scholars such as Vedvyasa discuss ten; Krtakoti discusses eight; six is most widely accepted: see Nicholson (2010, pp. 149–150)
  2.  Proponents of other Vedantic schools continue to write and develop their ideas as well, although their works are not widely known outside of smaller circles of followers in India.
  3.  The Vedanta–sÅ«tra are known by a variety of names, including (1) Brahma–sÅ«tra, (2) ŚārÄ«raka–sutra, (3) Bādarāyaṇa–sÅ«tra and (4) Uttara–mÄ«māṁsā.
  4.  Estimates of the date of Bādarāyana's lifetime differ. Pandey 2000, p. 4
  5.  Nicholson (2010, p. 27) writes: "The Brahmasutras themselves espouse the realist Parinamavada position, which appears to have been the view most common among early Vedantins."
  6.  Koller 2013, pp. 100–106; Sharma 1994, p. 211
  7.  Raju 1992, pp. 176–177; Isaeva 1992, p. 35 with footnote 30
  8.  Fowler 2002, pp. 34, 66; Flood 1996, pp. 238–239
  9.  Das 1952; Doniger & Stefon 2015; Lochtefeld 2000, p. 122; Sheridan 1991, p. 136
  10.  Ranganathan; Grimes 1990, pp. 6–7
  11.  Bartley, Christopher (2015). An Introduction to Indian Philosophy Hindu and Buddhist Ideas from Original Sources, p. 176. Bloomsbury Academic.
  12.  Bryant, Edwin. Krishna the Beautiful Legend of God (Srimad Bhagavata Purana Book X) (Penguin Classics), Introduction (pp. ix - lxxix).
  13.  Raju 1992, pp. 176–177, 505–506; Fowler 2002, pp. 49–59, 254, 269, 294–295, 345
  14.  Das 1952; Puligandla 1997, p. 222
  15.  Jones & Ryan 2006, p. 51; Johnson 2009, p. 'see entry for Atman(self)'
  16.  Lipner 1986, pp. 40–41, 51–56, 144; Hiriyanna 2008, pp. 23, 78, 158–162
  17.  Fowler 2002, p. 317; Chari 1988, pp. 2, 383
  18.  Ä€didevānanda 2014, pp. 9–10.
  19.  Betty 2010, pp. 215–224; Stoker 2011; Chari 1988, pp. 2, 383
  20.  Craig 2000, pp. 517–18; Stoker 2011; Bryant 2007, pp. 361–363
  21.  Lochtefeld 2000, pp. 520–521; Chari 1988, pp. 73–76
  22.  Potter 2002, pp. 25–26; Bhawuk 2011, p. 172
  23.  Bhawuk 2011, p. 172; Chari 1988, pp. 73–76; Flood 1996, pp. 225
  24.  Grimes 2006, p. 238; Puligandla 1997, p. 228; Clayton 2006, pp. 53–54
  25.  Indich 1995, pp. 65; Gupta 1995, pp. 137–166
  26.  Fowler 2002, p. 304; Puligandla 1997, pp. 208–211, 237–239; Sharma 2000, pp. 147–151
  27.  [1] Comparative analysis of Brahma Sutra commentaries
  28.  Nicholson; Sivananda 1993, p. 247
  29.  Das 1952; Hiriyanna 2008, pp. 160–161; O'Flaherty 1986, p. 119
  30.  Indich 1995, pp. 1–2, 97–102; Etter 2006, pp. 57–60, 63–65; Perrett 2013, pp. 247–248
  31.  Betty 2010, pp. 215–224; Craig 2000, pp. 517–518
  32.  Bartley 2013, pp. 1–2, 9–10, 76–79, 87–98; Sullivan 2001, p. 239; Doyle 2006, pp. 59–62
  33.  Etter 2006, pp. 57–60, 63–65; van Buitenin 2010
  34.  Schultz 1981, pp. 81–84; van Buitenin 2010; Sydnor 2012, pp. 84–87
  35.  Stoker 2011; von Dehsen 1999, p. 118
  36.  Jones & Ryan 2006, p. 266; Sarma 2000, pp. 19–21
  37.  Jones & Ryan 2006, p. 266; Sharma 1962, pp. 417–424; Sharma 1994, p. 373
  38.  Sharma 1994, pp. 374–375; Bryant 2007, pp. 361–362
  39.  Bryant 2007, p. 407; Gupta 2007, pp. 47–52
  40.  Nakamura 1989, p. 436. "... we can take it that 400-450 is the period during which the Brahma-sÅ«tra was compiled in its extant form."
  41.  Lochtefeld 2000, p. 746; Nakamura 1949, p. 436
  42.  Nakamura 2004, p. 3; Sharma 1996, pp. 124–125
  43.  Hiriyanna 2008, pp. 19, 21–25, 151–152; Sharma 1994, pp. 239–241; Nicholson 2010, p. 26
  44.  Isaeva 1992, p. 36.
  45.  Nicholson 2010, pp. 26–27; Mohanty & Wharton 2011
  46.  Comans 2000, p. 163; Jagannathan 2011
  47.  Olivelle 1992, pp. 17–18; Rigopoulos 1998, pp. 62–63; Phillips 1995, p. 332 with note 68
  48.  Olivelle 1992, pp. x–xi, 8–18; Sprockhoff 1976, pp. 277–294, 319–377
  49.  Sharma 1994, p. 239; Nikhilananda 2008, pp. 203–206; Nakamura 2004, p. 308; Sharma 1994, p. 239
  50.  Jackson 1992; Jackson 1991; Hawley 2015, pp. 304–310.
  51.  Sullivan 2001, p. 239; Schultz 1981, pp. 81–84; Bartley 2013, pp. 1–2; Carman 1974, p. 24
  52.  Olivelle 1992, pp. 10–11, 17–18; Bartley 2013, pp. 1–4, 52–53, 79
  53.  Bernard 1947, pp. 9–12; Sydnor 2012, pp. 0–11, 20–22
  54.  Bryant 2007, pp. 12–13, 359–361; Sharma 2000, pp. 77–78
  55.  Sharma 1962, pp. 128–129, 180–181; Sharma 1994, pp. 150–151, 372, 433–434; Sharma 2000, pp. 80–81
  56.  Lochtefeld 2000, p. 396; Stoker 2011
  57.  King 1999, p. 135; Flood 1996, p. 258; King 2002, p. 93
  58.  Witz 1998, p. 11; Schuon 1975, p. 91
  59.  Brooks 1990, pp. 20–22, 77–79; Nakamura 2004, p. 3
  60.  Smith 2003, pp. 126–128; Klostermaier 1984, pp. 177–178
  61.  Davis 2014, p. 167 note 21; Dyczkowski 1989, pp. 43–44
  62.  Vasugupta 2012, pp. 252, 259; Flood 1996, pp. 162–167
  63.  McDaniel 2004, pp. 89–91; Brooks 1990, pp. 35–39; Mahony 1997, p. 274 with note 73
  64.  Jones 1801, p. 164.
  65.  Goldstucker 1879, p. 32.
A full list of references for this article are available at the Vedanta Wikipedia page

Feedback & Support

To report an issue with this page, or to find out ways to support the mission, please click here.

Disclaimer

Important Notice

This content has been generated by an AI model and is intended for informational and educational purposes only. While efforts have been made to ensure accuracy and adherence to the provided source material, the information is based on a snapshot of data and may not be entirely comprehensive, up-to-date, or reflect the nuanced interpretations within the field of Vedanta.

This is not philosophical or spiritual advice. The information presented here should not substitute for consultation with qualified scholars, spiritual guides, or practitioners of Vedanta. Always seek guidance from appropriate experts for personal study and practice.

The creators of this page are not responsible for any errors or omissions, or for any actions taken based on the information provided herein.