Wiki2Web Studio

Create complete, beautiful interactive educational materials in less than 5 minutes.

Print flashcards, homework worksheets, exams/quizzes, study guides, & more.

Export your learner materials as an interactive game, a webpage, or FAQ style cheatsheet.

Unsaved Work Found!

It looks like you have unsaved work from a previous session. Would you like to restore it?

The 1950 United States House of Representatives Elections: Analysis and Outcomes

At a Glance

Title: The 1950 United States House of Representatives Elections: Analysis and Outcomes

Total Categories: 6

Category Stats

  • National Overview and Political Context: 10 flashcards, 13 questions
  • Congressional Leadership and Structure: 3 flashcards, 6 questions
  • Special Elections and Their Results: 7 flashcards, 4 questions
  • Incumbent Dynamics: Retirements and Renominations: 26 flashcards, 11 questions
  • District-Specific Electoral Shifts: 30 flashcards, 10 questions
  • Third Parties and Independent Candidates: 16 flashcards, 8 questions

Total Stats

  • Total Flashcards: 92
  • True/False Questions: 25
  • Multiple Choice Questions: 27
  • Total Questions: 52

Instructions

Click the button to expand the instructions for how to use the Wiki2Web Teacher studio in order to print, edit, and export data about The 1950 United States House of Representatives Elections: Analysis and Outcomes

Welcome to Your Curriculum Command Center

This guide will turn you into a Wiki2web Studio power user. Let's unlock the features designed to give you back your weekends.

The Core Concept: What is a "Kit"?

Think of a Kit as your all-in-one digital lesson plan. It's a single, portable file that contains every piece of content for a topic: your subject categories, a central image, all your flashcards, and all your questions. The true power of the Studio is speed—once a kit is made (or you import one), you are just minutes away from printing an entire set of coursework.

Getting Started is Simple:

  • Create New Kit: Start with a clean slate. Perfect for a brand-new lesson idea.
  • Import & Edit Existing Kit: Load a .json kit file from your computer to continue your work or to modify a kit created by a colleague.
  • Restore Session: The Studio automatically saves your progress in your browser. If you get interrupted, you can restore your unsaved work with one click.

Step 1: Laying the Foundation (The Authoring Tools)

This is where you build the core knowledge of your Kit. Use the left-side navigation panel to switch between these powerful authoring modules.

⚙️ Kit Manager: Your Kit's Identity

This is the high-level control panel for your project.

  • Kit Name: Give your Kit a clear title. This will appear on all your printed materials.
  • Master Image: Upload a custom cover image for your Kit. This is essential for giving your content a professional visual identity, and it's used as the main graphic when you export your Kit as an interactive game.
  • Topics: Create the structure for your lesson. Add topics like "Chapter 1," "Vocabulary," or "Key Formulas." All flashcards and questions will be organized under these topics.

🃏 Flashcard Author: Building the Knowledge Blocks

Flashcards are the fundamental concepts of your Kit. Create them here to define terms, list facts, or pose simple questions.

  • Click "➕ Add New Flashcard" to open the editor.
  • Fill in the term/question and the definition/answer.
  • Assign the flashcard to one of your pre-defined topics.
  • To edit or remove a flashcard, simply use the ✏️ (Edit) or ❌ (Delete) icons next to any entry in the list.

✍️ Question Author: Assessing Understanding

Create a bank of questions to test knowledge. These questions are the engine for your worksheets and exams.

  • Click "➕ Add New Question".
  • Choose a Type: True/False for quick checks or Multiple Choice for more complex assessments.
  • To edit an existing question, click the ✏️ icon. You can change the question text, options, correct answer, and explanation at any time.
  • The Explanation field is a powerful tool: the text you enter here will automatically appear on the teacher's answer key and on the Smart Study Guide, providing instant feedback.

🔗 Intelligent Mapper: The Smart Connection

This is the secret sauce of the Studio. The Mapper transforms your content from a simple list into an interconnected web of knowledge, automating the creation of amazing study guides.

  • Step 1: Select a question from the list on the left.
  • Step 2: In the right panel, click on every flashcard that contains a concept required to answer that question. They will turn green, indicating a successful link.
  • The Payoff: When you generate a Smart Study Guide, these linked flashcards will automatically appear under each question as "Related Concepts."

Step 2: The Magic (The Generator Suite)

You've built your content. Now, with a few clicks, turn it into a full suite of professional, ready-to-use materials. What used to take hours of formatting and copying-and-pasting can now be done in seconds.

🎓 Smart Study Guide Maker

Instantly create the ultimate review document. It combines your questions, the correct answers, your detailed explanations, and all the "Related Concepts" you linked in the Mapper into one cohesive, printable guide.

📝 Worksheet & 📄 Exam Builder

Generate unique assessments every time. The questions and multiple-choice options are randomized automatically. Simply select your topics, choose how many questions you need, and generate:

  • A Student Version, clean and ready for quizzing.
  • A Teacher Version, complete with a detailed answer key and the explanations you wrote.

🖨️ Flashcard Printer

Forget wrestling with table layouts in a word processor. Select a topic, choose a cards-per-page layout, and instantly generate perfectly formatted, print-ready flashcard sheets.

Step 3: Saving and Collaborating

  • 💾 Export & Save Kit: This is your primary save function. It downloads the entire Kit (content, images, and all) to your computer as a single .json file. Use this to create permanent backups and share your work with others.
  • ➕ Import & Merge Kit: Combine your work. You can merge a colleague's Kit into your own or combine two of your lessons into a larger review Kit.

You're now ready to reclaim your time.

You're not just a teacher; you're a curriculum designer, and this is your Studio.

This page is an interactive visualization based on the Wikipedia article "1950 United States House of Representatives elections" (opens in new tab) and its cited references.

Text content is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License (opens in new tab). Additional terms may apply.

Disclaimer: This website is for informational purposes only and does not constitute any kind of advice. The information is not a substitute for consulting official sources or records or seeking advice from qualified professionals.


Owned and operated by Artificial General Intelligence LLC, a Michigan Registered LLC
Prompt engineering done with Gracekits.com
All rights reserved
Sitemaps | Contact

Export Options





Study Guide: The 1950 United States House of Representatives Elections: Analysis and Outcomes

Study Guide: The 1950 United States House of Representatives Elections: Analysis and Outcomes

National Overview and Political Context

The 1950 United States House of Representatives elections were primarily held in early September, with a few states holding them later in November.

Answer: False

The 1950 U.S. House elections were primarily held on November 7, 1950, with only Maine holding its elections earlier in September.

Related Concepts:

  • When were the 1950 United States House of Representatives elections primarily held?: The 1950 United States House of Representatives elections were primarily held on November 7, 1950, with Maine holding its elections earlier on September 11, 1950. These elections determined the members who would serve in the 82nd United States Congress.

President Harry Truman's popularity was at an all-time high during the 1950 U.S. House elections, which positively impacted the Democratic Party's performance.

Answer: False

President Truman's popularity experienced a significant decline during the 1950 U.S. House elections, coinciding with the beginning of the Korean War, which contributed to the Democratic Party's net loss of seats.

Related Concepts:

  • What was the broader political context surrounding the 1950 U.S. House elections?: The 1950 U.S. House elections occurred midway through President Harry Truman's second term, coinciding with the onset of the Korean War. This period saw a significant decline in President Truman's personal popularity.
  • What was the net outcome for the Democratic Party in the 1950 U.S. House elections?: The Democratic Party experienced a net loss of 28 seats to the Republican Party in the 1950 U.S. House elections. This result reflected a challenging political climate, influenced by the Korean War and President Truman's diminished approval.

The Democratic Party gained a net of 28 seats from the Republican Party in the 1950 U.S. House elections.

Answer: False

The Democratic Party lost a net of 28 seats to the Republican Party in the 1950 U.S. House elections, decreasing their total from 263 to 235 seats.

Related Concepts:

  • What was the net outcome for the Democratic Party in the 1950 U.S. House elections?: The Democratic Party experienced a net loss of 28 seats to the Republican Party in the 1950 U.S. House elections. This result reflected a challenging political climate, influenced by the Korean War and President Truman's diminished approval.
  • Compare the Democratic Party's seat count in the 1948 election to its performance in 1950.: In the 1948 election, the Democratic Party held 263 seats. In the 1950 elections, they secured 235 seats, marking a decrease of 28 seats.
  • Compare the Republican Party's seat count in the 1948 election to its performance in 1950.: In the 1948 election, the Republican Party held 171 seats. In the 1950 elections, they won 199 seats, representing an increase of 28 seats.

The Democratic Party's popular vote percentage in the 1950 U.S. House elections was higher than that of the Republican Party.

Answer: True

The Democratic Party received 49.6% of the popular vote, while the Republican Party received 48.9%, indicating a higher percentage for the Democrats.

Related Concepts:

  • What was the Democratic Party's popular vote percentage in the 1950 U.S. House elections?: The Democratic Party garnered 49.6% of the popular vote in the 1950 U.S. House elections, amounting to 19,991,683 votes.
  • What was the Republican Party's popular vote percentage in the 1950 U.S. House elections?: The Republican Party received 48.9% of the popular vote in the 1950 U.S. House elections, totaling 19,735,173 votes.

The Democratic Party experienced a popular vote increase of 3.0 percentage points in the 1950 elections.

Answer: False

The Democratic Party experienced a decrease of 3.0 percentage points in their popular vote share in the 1950 elections.

Related Concepts:

  • What was the popular vote swing for the Democratic Party in the 1950 elections?: The Democratic Party experienced a decrease of 3.0 percentage points in their popular vote share in the 1950 elections.

The Republican Party saw an increase of 3.5 percentage points in their popular vote share in the 1950 elections.

Answer: True

The Republican Party experienced an increase of 3.5 percentage points in their popular vote share in the 1950 elections.

Related Concepts:

  • What was the popular vote swing for the Republican Party in the 1950 elections?: The Republican Party experienced an increase of 3.5 percentage points in their popular vote share in the 1950 elections.

The total popular vote across all parties in the 1950 U.S. House elections exceeded 50 million votes.

Answer: False

The total popular vote across all parties in the 1950 U.S. House elections was 40,341,883 votes, which is less than 50 million.

Related Concepts:

  • What was the total popular vote across all parties in the 1950 U.S. House elections?: The total popular vote across all parties in the 1950 U.S. House elections was 40,341,883 votes.

On what date were the 1950 United States House of Representatives elections primarily held?

Answer: November 7, 1950

The 1950 U.S. House elections were primarily held on November 7, 1950, with Maine being an exception.

Related Concepts:

  • When were the 1950 United States House of Representatives elections primarily held?: The 1950 United States House of Representatives elections were primarily held on November 7, 1950, with Maine holding its elections earlier on September 11, 1950. These elections determined the members who would serve in the 82nd United States Congress.

What significant event coincided with the 1950 U.S. House elections and contributed to President Truman's declining popularity?

Answer: The beginning of the Korean War

The 1950 U.S. House elections coincided with the beginning of the Korean War, which significantly contributed to President Truman's declining popularity.

Related Concepts:

  • What was the broader political context surrounding the 1950 U.S. House elections?: The 1950 U.S. House elections occurred midway through President Harry Truman's second term, coinciding with the onset of the Korean War. This period saw a significant decline in President Truman's personal popularity.

How many seats did the Democratic Party lose to the Republican Party in the 1950 U.S. House elections?

Answer: 28 seats

The Democratic Party experienced a net loss of 28 seats to the Republican Party in the 1950 U.S. House elections.

Related Concepts:

  • What was the net outcome for the Democratic Party in the 1950 U.S. House elections?: The Democratic Party experienced a net loss of 28 seats to the Republican Party in the 1950 U.S. House elections. This result reflected a challenging political climate, influenced by the Korean War and President Truman's diminished approval.
  • Compare the Democratic Party's seat count in the 1948 election to its performance in 1950.: In the 1948 election, the Democratic Party held 263 seats. In the 1950 elections, they secured 235 seats, marking a decrease of 28 seats.
  • Compare the Republican Party's seat count in the 1948 election to its performance in 1950.: In the 1948 election, the Republican Party held 171 seats. In the 1950 elections, they won 199 seats, representing an increase of 28 seats.

What was the popular vote percentage for the Democratic Party in the 1950 U.S. House elections?

Answer: 49.6%

The Democratic Party received 49.6% of the popular vote in the 1950 U.S. House elections.

Related Concepts:

  • What was the Democratic Party's popular vote percentage in the 1950 U.S. House elections?: The Democratic Party garnered 49.6% of the popular vote in the 1950 U.S. House elections, amounting to 19,991,683 votes.

What was the popular vote swing for the Republican Party in the 1950 elections?

Answer: An increase of 3.5 percentage points

The Republican Party experienced an increase of 3.5 percentage points in their popular vote share in the 1950 elections.

Related Concepts:

  • What was the popular vote swing for the Republican Party in the 1950 elections?: The Republican Party experienced an increase of 3.5 percentage points in their popular vote share in the 1950 elections.

What was the total popular vote across all parties in the 1950 U.S. House elections?

Answer: Approximately 40 million votes

The total popular vote across all parties in the 1950 U.S. House elections was 40,341,883 votes, which is approximately 40 million.

Related Concepts:

  • What was the total popular vote across all parties in the 1950 U.S. House elections?: The total popular vote across all parties in the 1950 U.S. House elections was 40,341,883 votes.

Congressional Leadership and Structure

A total of 435 seats were contested in the 1950 U.S. House elections, requiring 218 seats for a majority.

Answer: True

All 435 seats in the House of Representatives were up for election in 1950, and 218 seats were necessary to form a majority.

Related Concepts:

  • How many seats were contested in the 1950 U.S. House elections, and what constituted a majority?: All 435 seats in the United States House of Representatives were contested in 1950, with 218 seats required to achieve a majority.

Joseph Martin, a Democrat, served as the Speaker of the House both before and after the 1950 elections.

Answer: False

Joseph Martin was the Republican leader, not the Speaker. Sam Rayburn, a Democrat, was the Speaker both before and after the 1950 elections.

Related Concepts:

  • Who served as the Democratic and Republican leaders in the House of Representatives during the 1950 elections?: Sam Rayburn, representing Texas's 4th congressional district, was the Democratic leader, a role he had held since September 16, 1940. Joseph Martin, representing Massachusetts's 14th congressional district, was the Republican leader, serving since January 3, 1939.
  • Who served as the Speaker of the United States House of Representatives both before and after the 1950 elections?: Sam Rayburn, a Democrat, maintained his position as Speaker of the United States House of Representatives both before and after the 1950 elections, despite the Democratic Party's net loss of seats.

Sam Rayburn, representing Texas's 4th congressional district, was the Democratic leader in the House during the 1950 elections.

Answer: True

Sam Rayburn, representing Texas's 4th congressional district, served as the Democratic leader in the House of Representatives during the 1950 elections.

Related Concepts:

  • Who served as the Democratic and Republican leaders in the House of Representatives during the 1950 elections?: Sam Rayburn, representing Texas's 4th congressional district, was the Democratic leader, a role he had held since September 16, 1940. Joseph Martin, representing Massachusetts's 14th congressional district, was the Republican leader, serving since January 3, 1939.

How many seats were required to secure a majority in the United States House of Representatives during the 1950 elections?

Answer: 218 seats

To secure a majority in the 1950 U.S. House of Representatives, 218 seats were required out of the total 435 contested seats.

Related Concepts:

  • How many seats were contested in the 1950 U.S. House elections, and what constituted a majority?: All 435 seats in the United States House of Representatives were contested in 1950, with 218 seats required to achieve a majority.

Who was the Republican leader in the House of Representatives during the 1950 elections?

Answer: Joseph Martin

Joseph Martin, representing Massachusetts's 14th congressional district, served as the Republican leader in the House during the 1950 elections.

Related Concepts:

  • Who served as the Democratic and Republican leaders in the House of Representatives during the 1950 elections?: Sam Rayburn, representing Texas's 4th congressional district, was the Democratic leader, a role he had held since September 16, 1940. Joseph Martin, representing Massachusetts's 14th congressional district, was the Republican leader, serving since January 3, 1939.

Who served as the Speaker of the United States House of Representatives both before and after the 1950 elections?

Answer: Sam Rayburn

Sam Rayburn, a Democrat, held the position of Speaker of the United States House of Representatives both before and after the 1950 elections.

Related Concepts:

  • Who served as the Speaker of the United States House of Representatives both before and after the 1950 elections?: Sam Rayburn, a Democrat, maintained his position as Speaker of the United States House of Representatives both before and after the 1950 elections, despite the Democratic Party's net loss of seats.

Special Elections and Their Results

There were exactly three special elections held during the year of the 1950 U.S. House elections.

Answer: False

A total of six special elections were held throughout the year of the 1950 U.S. House elections.

Related Concepts:

  • How many special elections were conducted during the year of the 1950 U.S. House elections?: A total of six special elections were held throughout the year of the 1950 U.S. House elections.

How many special elections were conducted during the year of the 1950 U.S. House elections?

Answer: Six

There were six special elections held throughout the year of the 1950 U.S. House elections.

Related Concepts:

  • How many special elections were conducted during the year of the 1950 U.S. House elections?: A total of six special elections were held throughout the year of the 1950 U.S. House elections.

What was the outcome of the special election in New Jersey's 7th congressional district in February 1950?

Answer: A Republican hold

In New Jersey's 7th congressional district, William B. Widnall (Republican) was elected in a special election, maintaining a Republican hold after the incumbent's resignation.

Related Concepts:

  • What was the outcome of the special election in New Jersey's 7th congressional district in February 1950?: In New Jersey's 7th congressional district, Republican J. Parnell Thomas resigned on January 2, 1950. William B. Widnall, also a Republican, was elected on February 6, 1950, securing a Republican hold. Widnall was subsequently re-elected in the general election.

Which party gained a seat in the special election for Texas's 18th congressional district in May 1950?

Answer: Republican Party

In Texas's 18th congressional district, Ben H. Guill (Republican) won the special election, marking a Republican gain.

Related Concepts:

  • Which party gained a seat in the special election for Texas's 18th congressional district in May 1950?: In Texas's 18th congressional district, Democratic incumbent Eugene Worley resigned on April 3, 1950. Ben H. Guill, a Republican, was elected on May 6, 1950, marking a Republican gain. However, Guill subsequently lost re-election in the general election.

Incumbent Dynamics: Retirements and Renominations

In Tennessee's 1st congressional district, the incumbent Dayton E. Phillips (Republican) lost renomination but successfully won re-election as an Independent.

Answer: False

Dayton E. Phillips lost renomination and was subsequently defeated as an Independent candidate; the seat was won by Republican B. Carroll Reece.

Related Concepts:

  • What was the result of the election in Tennessee's 1st congressional district for the incumbent, Dayton E. Phillips?: In Tennessee's 1st congressional district, the incumbent, Dayton E. Phillips (Republican), lost renomination and was subsequently defeated as an Independent candidate. B. Carroll Reece (Republican) won the election with 46.5% of the vote, maintaining a Republican hold for the district.

Following the death of Martin Gorski (Democratic) in Illinois's 5th congressional district, a Republican candidate won the special election.

Answer: False

Following Martin Gorski's death, John C. Kluczynski (Democratic) won the election, maintaining a Democratic hold on the seat.

Related Concepts:

  • Who won the seat in Illinois's 5th congressional district after the incumbent's death?: Following the death of incumbent Martin Gorski (Democratic) in Illinois's 5th congressional district, John C. Kluczynski (Democratic) won the election with 65.6% of the vote, maintaining a Democratic hold.

Richard Nixon, the incumbent in California's 12th congressional district, retired to run for Governor of California.

Answer: False

Richard Nixon retired from California's 12th congressional district to run for U.S. senator, not Governor of California.

Related Concepts:

  • In California's 12th congressional district, why did the incumbent retire, and who won the seat?: In California's 12th congressional district, incumbent Richard Nixon (Republican) retired to run for U.S. senator. Patrick J. Hillings (Republican) won the seat with 60.1% of the vote, maintaining a Republican hold.

Helen Gahagan Douglas (Democratic) retired from California's 14th congressional district to run for U.S. senator, and the seat remained a Democratic hold.

Answer: True

Helen Gahagan Douglas retired to run for U.S. senator, and Sam Yorty (Democratic) won the seat, maintaining a Democratic hold.

Related Concepts:

  • What was the reason for the incumbent's retirement in California's 14th congressional district, and who won the seat?: In California's 14th congressional district, incumbent Helen Gahagan Douglas (Democratic) retired to run for U.S. senator. Sam Yorty (Democratic) won the seat with 49.4% of the vote, maintaining a Democratic hold.

Mike Monroney (Democratic) retired from Oklahoma's 5th congressional district to run for U.S. senator, and the seat was successfully held by a Democrat.

Answer: True

Mike Monroney retired to run for U.S. senator, and John Jarman (Democratic) won the seat, ensuring a Democratic hold.

Related Concepts:

  • What was the reason for the incumbent's retirement in Oklahoma's 5th congressional district, and who won the seat?: In Oklahoma's 5th congressional district, incumbent Mike Monroney (Democratic) retired to run for U.S. senator. John Jarman (Democratic) won the seat with 58.8% of the vote, maintaining a Democratic hold.

In Ohio's 8th congressional district, Frederick Cleveland Smith (Republican) retired, and the seat was subsequently won by a Democrat.

Answer: False

Frederick Cleveland Smith (Republican) retired, and Jackson Edward Betts (Republican) won the election, maintaining a Republican hold on the seat.

Related Concepts:

  • Who succeeded the retiring Republican incumbent in Ohio's 8th congressional district?: In Ohio's 8th congressional district, incumbent Frederick Cleveland Smith (Republican) retired. Jackson Edward Betts (Republican) won the election with 62.7% of the vote, maintaining a Republican hold.

Which Democratic incumbent retired in Florida's 1st congressional district, and who won the seat?

Answer: J. Hardin Peterson, succeeded by Chester B. McMullen (Democratic)

J. Hardin Peterson (Democratic) retired from Florida's 1st congressional district, and Chester B. McMullen (Democratic) won the seat uncontested.

Related Concepts:

  • Which Democratic incumbent retired in Florida's 1st congressional district, and who won the seat?: In Florida's 1st congressional district, incumbent J. Hardin Peterson (Democratic) retired. Chester B. McMullen (Democratic) won the seat uncontested, ensuring a Democratic hold.

Why did Richard Nixon, the incumbent in California's 12th congressional district, retire?

Answer: To run for U.S. senator

Richard Nixon retired from his congressional seat in California's 12th district to pursue a campaign for U.S. senator.

Related Concepts:

  • In California's 12th congressional district, why did the incumbent retire, and who won the seat?: In California's 12th congressional district, incumbent Richard Nixon (Republican) retired to run for U.S. senator. Patrick J. Hillings (Republican) won the seat with 60.1% of the vote, maintaining a Republican hold.

Who succeeded the retiring Republican incumbent John C. Sanborn in Idaho's 2nd congressional district?

Answer: Hamer H. Budge

Hamer H. Budge (Republican) won the election in Idaho's 2nd congressional district, succeeding the retiring Republican incumbent John C. Sanborn.

Related Concepts:

  • Who succeeded the retiring Republican incumbent in Idaho's 2nd congressional district?: In Idaho's 2nd congressional district, incumbent John C. Sanborn (Republican) retired to run for U.S. senator. Hamer H. Budge (Republican) won the election with 57.1% of the vote, maintaining a Republican hold.

Which Democratic incumbent lost renomination in South Carolina's 2nd congressional district, and who won the seat?

Answer: Hugo S. Sims Jr., succeeded by John J. Riley (Democratic).

Hugo S. Sims Jr. (Democratic) lost renomination in South Carolina's 2nd congressional district, and John J. Riley (Democratic) won the seat, maintaining a Democratic hold.

Related Concepts:

  • Which Democratic incumbent lost renomination in South Carolina's 2nd congressional district, and who won the seat?: In South Carolina's 2nd congressional district, incumbent Hugo S. Sims Jr. (Democratic) lost renomination. John J. Riley (Democratic) won the seat uncontested, maintaining a Democratic hold.

What was the outcome for the incumbent George G. Sadowski in Michigan's 1st congressional district?

Answer: He lost renomination but the seat remained Democratic.

George G. Sadowski (Democratic) lost renomination in Michigan's 1st congressional district, but Thaddeus M. Machrowicz (Democratic) won the election, keeping the seat Democratic.

Related Concepts:

  • What was the result for the incumbent in Michigan's 1st congressional district?: In Michigan's 1st congressional district, incumbent George G. Sadowski (Democratic) lost renomination. Thaddeus M. Machrowicz (Democratic) won the election with 82.2% of the vote, maintaining a Democratic hold.

District-Specific Electoral Shifts

Compton I. White (Democratic) retired from Idaho's 1st congressional district to run for governor, leading to a Republican gain in the seat.

Answer: False

Compton I. White (Democratic) retired from Idaho's 1st congressional district to run for U.S. senator, not governor, and the seat was indeed a Republican gain.

Related Concepts:

  • What was the outcome in Idaho's 1st congressional district, where the incumbent retired?: In Idaho's 1st congressional district, incumbent Compton I. White (Democratic) retired to run for U.S. senator. John Travers Wood (Republican) won the seat with 50.5% of the vote, resulting in a Republican gain.

All Democratic incumbents in Illinois's 2nd, 3rd, and 4th congressional districts successfully defended their seats in the 1950 elections.

Answer: False

Democratic incumbents Barratt O'Hara (2nd district), Neil J. Linehan (3rd district), and James V. Buckley (4th district) all lost re-election to Republican challengers.

Related Concepts:

  • What was the result for the Democratic incumbent in Illinois's 2nd congressional district?: In Illinois's 2nd congressional district, incumbent Barratt O'Hara (Democratic) lost re-election. Richard B. Vail (Republican) won the seat with 53.6% of the vote, marking a Republican gain.
  • Who won Illinois's 3rd congressional district, and what was the fate of the Democratic incumbent?: In Illinois's 3rd congressional district, incumbent Neil J. Linehan (Democratic) lost re-election. Fred E. Busbey (Republican) won the seat with 57.2% of the vote, resulting in a Republican gain.
  • What was the outcome of the election in Illinois's 4th congressional district?: In Illinois's 4th congressional district, incumbent James V. Buckley (Democratic) lost re-election. William E. McVey (Republican) won the seat with 55.8% of the vote, marking a Republican gain.

In New York's 20th congressional district, Franklin D. Roosevelt Jr. was re-elected as a Liberal Party candidate, maintaining the Liberal Party's hold on the seat.

Answer: False

Franklin D. Roosevelt Jr. was re-elected as a Democrat, having previously represented the Liberal Party, marking a Democratic gain for the seat.

Related Concepts:

  • Who won the election in New York's 20th congressional district, and what was notable about the incumbent's party change?: In New York's 20th congressional district, incumbent Franklin D. Roosevelt Jr. was re-elected as a Democrat, having previously represented the Liberal Party. He won with 62.1% of the vote, marking a Democratic gain for the seat.

Who won the election in California's 9th congressional district, marking a Republican gain?

Answer: Allan O. Hunter

Allan O. Hunter (Republican) won the election in California's 9th congressional district, defeating the incumbent Cecil F. White (Democratic) and securing a Republican gain.

Related Concepts:

  • What was the result of the election in California's 9th congressional district?: In California's 9th congressional district, the incumbent, Cecil F. White (Democratic), lost re-election. Allan O. Hunter (Republican) won the seat with 52.0% of the vote, marking a Republican gain.

In Illinois's 2nd congressional district, what was the outcome for the Democratic incumbent Barratt O'Hara?

Answer: He lost re-election to a Republican.

Barratt O'Hara (Democratic) lost re-election in Illinois's 2nd congressional district to Republican Richard B. Vail.

Related Concepts:

  • What was the result for the Democratic incumbent in Illinois's 2nd congressional district?: In Illinois's 2nd congressional district, incumbent Barratt O'Hara (Democratic) lost re-election. Richard B. Vail (Republican) won the seat with 53.6% of the vote, marking a Republican gain.

What was the outcome for Vito Marcantonio, the American Labor Party incumbent in New York's 18th congressional district?

Answer: He lost re-election to a Democratic candidate.

Vito Marcantonio, the American Labor Party incumbent, lost re-election in New York's 18th congressional district to James G. Donovan (Democratic).

Related Concepts:

  • What was the outcome for Vito Marcantonio, the American Labor Party incumbent in New York's 18th congressional district?: Vito Marcantonio, the American Labor Party incumbent in New York's 18th congressional district, lost re-election. James G. Donovan (Democratic) won the seat with 57.8% of the vote, resulting in a Democratic gain.

In Ohio's 14th congressional district, what was the result for the Democratic incumbent Walter B. Huber?

Answer: He lost re-election to a Republican.

Walter B. Huber (Democratic) lost re-election in Ohio's 14th congressional district to William Hanes Ayres (Republican).

Related Concepts:

  • What was the result for the Democratic incumbent in Ohio's 14th congressional district?: In Ohio's 14th congressional district, incumbent Walter B. Huber (Democratic) lost re-election. William Hanes Ayres (Republican) won the seat with 48.7% of the vote, marking a Republican gain.

Who gained the seat in Oklahoma's 1st congressional district, and what was the result for the incumbent?

Answer: Dixie Gilmer (Democratic) lost re-election to George B. Schwabe (Republican).

In Oklahoma's 1st congressional district, incumbent Dixie Gilmer (Democratic) lost re-election to George B. Schwabe (Republican), resulting in a Republican gain.

Related Concepts:

  • Who gained the seat in Oklahoma's 1st congressional district, and what was the result for the incumbent?: In Oklahoma's 1st congressional district, incumbent Dixie Gilmer (Democratic) lost re-election. George B. Schwabe (Republican) won the seat with 52.9% of the vote, resulting in a Republican gain.

What was the outcome for the at-large Democratic incumbent in Ohio, Stephen M. Young?

Answer: He lost re-election to a Republican.

Stephen M. Young (Democratic), the at-large incumbent in Ohio, lost re-election to Republican George H. Bender.

Related Concepts:

  • What was the outcome for the at-large Democratic incumbent in Ohio?: In Ohio's at-large congressional district, incumbent Stephen M. Young (Democratic) lost re-election. George H. Bender (Republican) won the seat with 53.9% of the vote, marking a Republican gain.

In Pennsylvania's 23rd congressional district, what happened to the incumbent Anthony Cavalcante (Democratic)?

Answer: He lost re-election to Edward L. Sittler Jr. (Republican).

Anthony Cavalcante (Democratic) lost re-election in Pennsylvania's 23rd congressional district to Edward L. Sittler Jr. (Republican).

Related Concepts:

  • Who gained the seat in Pennsylvania's 23rd congressional district, and what happened to the incumbent?: In Pennsylvania's 23rd congressional district, incumbent Anthony Cavalcante (Democratic) lost re-election. Edward L. Sittler Jr. (Republican) won the seat with 51.8% of the vote, resulting in a Republican gain.

Third Parties and Independent Candidates

The 1950 U.S. House elections were notable for being the first time since 1908 that no third parties acquired any seats in the House of Representatives, with the exception of one Independent.

Answer: True

The 1950 elections marked the first time since 1908 that no third parties won seats, though one Independent candidate did secure a seat.

Related Concepts:

  • What was a historically significant aspect of the 1950 U.S. House elections concerning third parties?: The 1950 U.S. House elections were notable as the first time since 1908 that no third parties secured any seats in the House of Representatives, underscoring a strong two-party dominance.
  • How many seats did Independent politicians win in the 1950 U.S. House elections?: Independent politicians won 1 seat in the 1950 U.S. House elections, an increase of 1 seat from the previous election, and received 0.3% of the popular vote (119,634 votes).

The American Labor Party won one seat in the 1950 U.S. House elections, despite a decrease in their popular vote percentage.

Answer: False

The American Labor Party won no seats in the 1950 U.S. House elections, experiencing a decrease of one seat from the previous election.

Related Concepts:

  • Which third party received the highest popular vote percentage in the 1950 elections, and how many seats did they win?: The American Labor Party received the highest popular vote percentage among third parties at 0.6% (225,368 votes) but won no seats. They experienced a decrease of 1 seat from the previous election.

The Liberal Party in New York gained a seat in the 1950 elections, increasing their representation in the House.

Answer: False

The Liberal Party won no seats in the 1950 U.S. House elections, representing a decrease of one seat from the previous election.

Related Concepts:

  • What was the outcome for the Liberal Party in New York in the 1950 elections?: The Liberal Party won 0 seats in the 1950 U.S. House elections, a decrease of 1 seat from the previous election, and received 0.2% of the popular vote (87,827 votes).

The Prohibition Party won at least one seat in the 1950 U.S. House elections.

Answer: False

The Prohibition Party won no seats in the 1950 U.S. House elections, receiving only 0.1% of the popular vote.

Related Concepts:

  • What was the vote share for the Prohibition Party in the 1950 U.S. House elections?: The Prohibition Party received 0.1% of the popular vote (34,761 votes) and won no seats in the 1950 U.S. House elections.

The States' Rights Democratic Party received over 1,000 votes in the 1950 U.S. House elections.

Answer: False

The States' Rights Democratic Party received only 147 votes in the 1950 U.S. House elections.

Related Concepts:

  • Did the States' Rights Democratic Party win any seats in 1950, and what was their popular vote?: The States' Rights Democratic Party won 0 seats and received less than 0.1% of the popular vote (147 votes) in the 1950 U.S. House elections.

What was a unique historical aspect of the 1950 U.S. House elections regarding third parties?

Answer: It was the first time since 1908 that no third parties acquired any seats.

The 1950 U.S. House elections were historically significant as no third parties acquired any seats for the first time since 1908.

Related Concepts:

  • What was a historically significant aspect of the 1950 U.S. House elections concerning third parties?: The 1950 U.S. House elections were notable as the first time since 1908 that no third parties secured any seats in the House of Representatives, underscoring a strong two-party dominance.

In Ohio's 9th congressional district, what was unique about Frazier Reams' victory?

Answer: He won as an Independent candidate.

Frazier Reams' victory in Ohio's 9th congressional district was unique because he won as an Independent candidate, defeating the Democratic incumbent.

Related Concepts:

  • In Ohio's 9th congressional district, what was unique about the winner's party affiliation?: In Ohio's 9th congressional district, the incumbent, Thomas Henry Burke (Democratic), lost re-election. Frazier Reams won the seat as an Independent with 36.6% of the vote, marking an Independent gain. This was notable as it was one of the few instances of a non-major party candidate winning a seat.

Which third party received the highest popular vote percentage in the 1950 elections but won no seats?

Answer: American Labor Party

The American Labor Party received the highest popular vote percentage among third parties at 0.6% but failed to win any seats.

Related Concepts:

  • Which third party received the highest popular vote percentage in the 1950 elections, and how many seats did they win?: The American Labor Party received the highest popular vote percentage among third parties at 0.6% (225,368 votes) but won no seats. They experienced a decrease of 1 seat from the previous election.

Home | Sitemaps | Contact | Terms | Privacy