Wiki2Web Studio

Create complete, beautiful interactive educational materials in less than 5 minutes.

Print flashcards, homework worksheets, exams/quizzes, study guides, & more.

Export your learner materials as an interactive game, a webpage, or FAQ style cheatsheet.

Unsaved Work Found!

It looks like you have unsaved work from a previous session. Would you like to restore it?


The 1971 Salem, Illinois Amtrak Derailment: Causes and Consequences

At a Glance

Title: The 1971 Salem, Illinois Amtrak Derailment: Causes and Consequences

Total Categories: 6

Category Stats

  • The Incident Overview: 13 flashcards, 16 questions
  • Mechanical Failures and Contributing Factors: 15 flashcards, 23 questions
  • NTSB Investigation and Findings: 7 flashcards, 9 questions
  • Consequences and Impact: 7 flashcards, 9 questions
  • Safety Recommendations and Subsequent Actions: 5 flashcards, 8 questions
  • Unidentified Victims and Identification Efforts: 4 flashcards, 4 questions

Total Stats

  • Total Flashcards: 51
  • True/False Questions: 33
  • Multiple Choice Questions: 36
  • Total Questions: 69

Instructions

Click the button to expand the instructions for how to use the Wiki2Web Teacher studio in order to print, edit, and export data about The 1971 Salem, Illinois Amtrak Derailment: Causes and Consequences

Welcome to Your Curriculum Command Center

This guide will turn you into a Wiki2web Studio power user. Let's unlock the features designed to give you back your weekends.

The Core Concept: What is a "Kit"?

Think of a Kit as your all-in-one digital lesson plan. It's a single, portable file that contains every piece of content for a topic: your subject categories, a central image, all your flashcards, and all your questions. The true power of the Studio is speed—once a kit is made (or you import one), you are just minutes away from printing an entire set of coursework.

Getting Started is Simple:

  • Create New Kit: Start with a clean slate. Perfect for a brand-new lesson idea.
  • Import & Edit Existing Kit: Load a .json kit file from your computer to continue your work or to modify a kit created by a colleague.
  • Restore Session: The Studio automatically saves your progress in your browser. If you get interrupted, you can restore your unsaved work with one click.

Step 1: Laying the Foundation (The Authoring Tools)

This is where you build the core knowledge of your Kit. Use the left-side navigation panel to switch between these powerful authoring modules.

⚙️ Kit Manager: Your Kit's Identity

This is the high-level control panel for your project.

  • Kit Name: Give your Kit a clear title. This will appear on all your printed materials.
  • Master Image: Upload a custom cover image for your Kit. This is essential for giving your content a professional visual identity, and it's used as the main graphic when you export your Kit as an interactive game.
  • Topics: Create the structure for your lesson. Add topics like "Chapter 1," "Vocabulary," or "Key Formulas." All flashcards and questions will be organized under these topics.

🃏 Flashcard Author: Building the Knowledge Blocks

Flashcards are the fundamental concepts of your Kit. Create them here to define terms, list facts, or pose simple questions.

  • Click "➕ Add New Flashcard" to open the editor.
  • Fill in the term/question and the definition/answer.
  • Assign the flashcard to one of your pre-defined topics.
  • To edit or remove a flashcard, simply use the ✏️ (Edit) or ❌ (Delete) icons next to any entry in the list.

✍️ Question Author: Assessing Understanding

Create a bank of questions to test knowledge. These questions are the engine for your worksheets and exams.

  • Click "➕ Add New Question".
  • Choose a Type: True/False for quick checks or Multiple Choice for more complex assessments.
  • To edit an existing question, click the ✏️ icon. You can change the question text, options, correct answer, and explanation at any time.
  • The Explanation field is a powerful tool: the text you enter here will automatically appear on the teacher's answer key and on the Smart Study Guide, providing instant feedback.

🔗 Intelligent Mapper: The Smart Connection

This is the secret sauce of the Studio. The Mapper transforms your content from a simple list into an interconnected web of knowledge, automating the creation of amazing study guides.

  • Step 1: Select a question from the list on the left.
  • Step 2: In the right panel, click on every flashcard that contains a concept required to answer that question. They will turn green, indicating a successful link.
  • The Payoff: When you generate a Smart Study Guide, these linked flashcards will automatically appear under each question as "Related Concepts."

Step 2: The Magic (The Generator Suite)

You've built your content. Now, with a few clicks, turn it into a full suite of professional, ready-to-use materials. What used to take hours of formatting and copying-and-pasting can now be done in seconds.

🎓 Smart Study Guide Maker

Instantly create the ultimate review document. It combines your questions, the correct answers, your detailed explanations, and all the "Related Concepts" you linked in the Mapper into one cohesive, printable guide.

📝 Worksheet & 📄 Exam Builder

Generate unique assessments every time. The questions and multiple-choice options are randomized automatically. Simply select your topics, choose how many questions you need, and generate:

  • A Student Version, clean and ready for quizzing.
  • A Teacher Version, complete with a detailed answer key and the explanations you wrote.

🖨️ Flashcard Printer

Forget wrestling with table layouts in a word processor. Select a topic, choose a cards-per-page layout, and instantly generate perfectly formatted, print-ready flashcard sheets.

Step 3: Saving and Collaborating

  • 💾 Export & Save Kit: This is your primary save function. It downloads the entire Kit (content, images, and all) to your computer as a single .json file. Use this to create permanent backups and share your work with others.
  • ➕ Import & Merge Kit: Combine your work. You can merge a colleague's Kit into your own or combine two of your lessons into a larger review Kit.

You're now ready to reclaim your time.

You're not just a teacher; you're a curriculum designer, and this is your Studio.

This page is an interactive visualization based on the Wikipedia article "1971 Salem, Illinois, derailment" (opens in new tab) and its cited references.

Text content is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License (opens in new tab). Additional terms may apply.

Disclaimer: This website is for informational purposes only and does not constitute any kind of advice. The information is not a substitute for consulting official sources or records or seeking advice from qualified professionals.


Owned and operated by Artificial General Intelligence LLC, a Michigan Registered LLC
Prompt engineering done with Gracekits.com
All rights reserved
Sitemaps | Contact

Export Options





Study Guide: The 1971 Salem, Illinois Amtrak Derailment: Causes and Consequences

Study Guide: The 1971 Salem, Illinois Amtrak Derailment: Causes and Consequences

The Incident Overview

The 1971 Salem, Illinois derailment involved Amtrak's passenger train, the *City of Chicago*.

Answer: False

The Amtrak train involved in the June 10, 1971 derailment was the *City of New Orleans*, not the *City of Chicago*. The *City of Chicago* was a different service operated by Amtrak.

Related Concepts:

  • Articulate the historical significance of this particular derailment event for the newly established Amtrak corporation.: The 1971 Salem, Illinois derailment marked Amtrak's first fatal accident since it took over the operation of most intercity passenger trains in the United States on May 1, 1971.
  • Identify the specific Amtrak passenger train involved in the 1971 Salem, Illinois derailment.: The train involved was Amtrak's passenger train named the *City of New Orleans*.

The derailment occurred on June 10, 1971, around 12:30 PM Central Time.

Answer: True

The catastrophic derailment transpired on June 10, 1971, at approximately 12:30 PM Central Time.

Related Concepts:

  • Ascertain the precise date and approximate time of day when the 1971 Salem, Illinois derailment occurred.: The derailment took place on June 10, 1971, around 12:30 PM Central Time.
  • What specific transportation incident is comprehensively detailed within the provided textual data?: The provided text details the 1971 Salem, Illinois derailment, a significant train crash that occurred on June 10, 1971.

The *City of New Orleans* train departed Chicago at 8:00 AM CT on June 10, 1971.

Answer: True

Amtrak's *City of New Orleans* commenced its journey from Chicago at 08:00 Central Time on June 10, 1971.

Related Concepts:

  • Detail the route and operational schedule of the *City of New Orleans* train on the day the accident occurred.: The *City of New Orleans* departed Chicago's Central Station at 8:00 AM CT on June 10, 1971. It was a daytime train operating between Chicago and New Orleans, Louisiana, with a scheduled arrival in New Orleans at 1:30 AM on June 11.
  • Identify the specific Amtrak passenger train involved in the 1971 Salem, Illinois derailment.: The train involved was Amtrak's passenger train named the *City of New Orleans*.

Locomotive #4031 derailed as it passed over a crossover switch at Tonti, Illinois.

Answer: True

Locomotive #4031 derailed precisely as it traversed a crossover switch located at Tonti, Illinois.

Related Concepts:

  • Pinpoint the exact location where locomotive #4031 derailed.: Locomotive #4031 derailed as it passed over a crossover switch at Tonti, Illinois.
  • Specify the geographical location where the 1971 Salem, Illinois derailment took place.: The derailment occurred near Salem, Illinois. It is also sometimes referred to as the Tonti derailment, named after the unincorporated community of Tonti, Illinois, which was the site of the crash.

Before Amtrak, this train was known as Illinois Central #2.

Answer: False

Prior to Amtrak's operational commencement, this specific train service was known as Illinois Central #1, not Illinois Central #2.

Related Concepts:

  • What was the official designation of this train service prior to Amtrak implementing its standardized naming conventions?: Before Amtrak issued a new timetable in November 1971, trains were officially nameless and used numbers assigned by their previous operators. This train had been Illinois Central #1.
  • Identify the original railroad operator of the *City of New Orleans* train service prior to Amtrak's assumption of operations.: Prior to Amtrak's assumption of operations on April 30, 1971, the *City of New Orleans* train had been operated by the Illinois Central Railroad.

The derailment occurred near the unincorporated community of Effingham, Illinois.

Answer: False

The derailment site was located near Tonti, Illinois, not Effingham. The incident is sometimes referred to as the Tonti derailment.

Related Concepts:

  • Specify the geographical location where the 1971 Salem, Illinois derailment took place.: The derailment occurred near Salem, Illinois. It is also sometimes referred to as the Tonti derailment, named after the unincorporated community of Tonti, Illinois, which was the site of the crash.
  • Provide the rationale for the derailment incident sometimes being referred to as the 'Tonti derailment'.: It is sometimes referred to as the Tonti derailment because the crash occurred near the unincorporated community of Tonti, Illinois.

The train consisted of 15 cars, including baggage, coaches, a diner-counter, a lounge car, and a combination car.

Answer: True

The train comprised 15 cars: one baggage car, eleven coaches, a diner-counter, a lounge car, and a combination coach/food service car.

Related Concepts:

  • Specify the total number of cars that constituted the *City of New Orleans* train at the moment of its derailment.: The train consisted of 15 cars: one baggage car, eleven coaches, a diner-counter, a lounge car, and a combination coach/food service car.

Which Amtrak train was involved in the June 10, 1971 derailment?

Answer: The *City of New Orleans*

The Amtrak passenger train involved in the catastrophic derailment on June 10, 1971, near Salem, Illinois, was identified as the *City of New Orleans*.

Related Concepts:

  • Identify the specific Amtrak passenger train involved in the 1971 Salem, Illinois derailment.: The train involved was Amtrak's passenger train named the *City of New Orleans*.
  • What specific transportation incident is comprehensively detailed within the provided textual data?: The provided text details the 1971 Salem, Illinois derailment, a significant train crash that occurred on June 10, 1971.

The derailment occurred near which unincorporated community, leading to an alternative name for the incident?

Answer: Tonti

The derailment occurred in proximity to the unincorporated community of Tonti, Illinois, which is why the incident is sometimes referred to as the Tonti derailment.

Related Concepts:

  • Specify the geographical location where the 1971 Salem, Illinois derailment took place.: The derailment occurred near Salem, Illinois. It is also sometimes referred to as the Tonti derailment, named after the unincorporated community of Tonti, Illinois, which was the site of the crash.
  • Provide the rationale for the derailment incident sometimes being referred to as the 'Tonti derailment'.: It is sometimes referred to as the Tonti derailment because the crash occurred near the unincorporated community of Tonti, Illinois.

How many cars were part of the *City of New Orleans* train during the derailment?

Answer: 15

The *City of New Orleans* train comprised 15 cars at the time of the derailment, including baggage, coaches, a diner-counter, a lounge car, and a combination car.

Related Concepts:

  • Specify the total number of cars that constituted the *City of New Orleans* train at the moment of its derailment.: The train consisted of 15 cars: one baggage car, eleven coaches, a diner-counter, a lounge car, and a combination coach/food service car.
  • Identify the specific Amtrak passenger train involved in the 1971 Salem, Illinois derailment.: The train involved was Amtrak's passenger train named the *City of New Orleans*.

Which railroad previously operated the *City of New Orleans* before Amtrak took over?

Answer: Illinois Central

The Illinois Central Railroad was the original operator of the service now known as the *City of New Orleans* prior to Amtrak's assumption of operations.

Related Concepts:

  • Identify the original railroad operator of the *City of New Orleans* train service prior to Amtrak's assumption of operations.: Prior to Amtrak's assumption of operations on April 30, 1971, the *City of New Orleans* train had been operated by the Illinois Central Railroad.
  • What was the official designation of this train service prior to Amtrak implementing its standardized naming conventions?: Before Amtrak issued a new timetable in November 1971, trains were officially nameless and used numbers assigned by their previous operators. This train had been Illinois Central #1.

The derailment occurred on which railroad line?

Answer: Illinois Central

The catastrophic derailment occurred on the Illinois Central railroad line.

Related Concepts:

  • Specify the geographical location where the 1971 Salem, Illinois derailment took place.: The derailment occurred near Salem, Illinois. It is also sometimes referred to as the Tonti derailment, named after the unincorporated community of Tonti, Illinois, which was the site of the crash.
  • Identify the original railroad operator of the *City of New Orleans* train service prior to Amtrak's assumption of operations.: Prior to Amtrak's assumption of operations on April 30, 1971, the *City of New Orleans* train had been operated by the Illinois Central Railroad.

What was the scheduled arrival time for the *City of New Orleans* in New Orleans on June 11?

Answer: 1:30 AM CT

The scheduled arrival time for the *City of New Orleans* in New Orleans on June 11, 1971, was 1:30 AM Central Time.

Related Concepts:

  • Detail the route and operational schedule of the *City of New Orleans* train on the day the accident occurred.: The *City of New Orleans* departed Chicago's Central Station at 8:00 AM CT on June 10, 1971. It was a daytime train operating between Chicago and New Orleans, Louisiana, with a scheduled arrival in New Orleans at 1:30 AM on June 11.

The derailment site is located in which U.S. state?

Answer: Illinois

The geographical location of the derailment site is situated within the U.S. state of Illinois.

Related Concepts:

  • Specify the geographical location where the 1971 Salem, Illinois derailment took place.: The derailment occurred near Salem, Illinois. It is also sometimes referred to as the Tonti derailment, named after the unincorporated community of Tonti, Illinois, which was the site of the crash.

What was the original operator number for the *City of New Orleans* before Amtrak?

Answer: Illinois Central #1

The operational designation for the *City of New Orleans* service under its previous operator, the Illinois Central Railroad, was Illinois Central #1.

Related Concepts:

  • Identify the original railroad operator of the *City of New Orleans* train service prior to Amtrak's assumption of operations.: Prior to Amtrak's assumption of operations on April 30, 1971, the *City of New Orleans* train had been operated by the Illinois Central Railroad.
  • What was the official designation of this train service prior to Amtrak implementing its standardized naming conventions?: Before Amtrak issued a new timetable in November 1971, trains were officially nameless and used numbers assigned by their previous operators. This train had been Illinois Central #1.

What geographical coordinates are provided for the derailment site?

Answer: 38.665431°N 88.977421°W

The precise geographical coordinates provided within the source material for the derailment site are 38.665431°N 88.977421°W.

Related Concepts:

  • What specific geographical information is conveyed by the coordinates 38.665431°N 88.977421°W?: These coordinates pinpoint the geographical location of the 1971 Salem, Illinois derailment.

Mechanical Failures and Contributing Factors

Locomotive #4031, the lead engine, was an EMD E9B model manufactured in 1960.

Answer: False

Locomotive #4031, the lead engine, was an EMD E8A model manufactured in 1952, not an EMD E9B manufactured in 1960.

Related Concepts:

  • Provide the precise model designation and manufacturing year of the lead locomotive, identified as unit #4031.: The lead locomotive, #4031, was an EMD E8A, originally manufactured in 1952.
  • Identify the classification and origin of the locomotives that were assigned to pull the *City of New Orleans* train.: The train was pulled by a set of four leased Illinois Central EMD E-units, including E8A #4031 (leading), E9Bs #4109 and #4106, and E10A #2024.

The #1 engine on locomotive #4031 failed during the southbound run from Chicago.

Answer: False

The mechanical failure occurred in the #2 engine of locomotive #4031 during its southbound transit from Chicago, not the #1 engine.

Related Concepts:

  • Describe the specific mechanical malfunction encountered by the #2 engine of locomotive #4031 prior to the derailment incident.: During the southbound run from Chicago, the #2 engine on locomotive #4031 failed and could not be repaired at that time.
  • Describe the mechanical issue that locomotive #4031 encountered during its preceding trip on June 6.: On the June 6 trip from Chicago to New Orleans, locomotive #4031's #2 engine had also failed.

After the crew change in Champaign, the new crew found the #2 engine on locomotive #4031 to be completely unresponsive.

Answer: False

Following the crew change in Champaign, the incoming crew erroneously concluded that the #2 engine of locomotive #4031 was functional, as it responded to the throttle, despite its prior mechanical issues.

Related Concepts:

  • Detail the observations made by the incoming crew regarding locomotive #4031's #2 engine subsequent to the crew change in Champaign, Illinois.: After the crew change in Champaign, the new crew observed that the #2 engine responded to the throttle, leading them to believe it was operational again.
  • Describe the specific mechanical malfunction encountered by the #2 engine of locomotive #4031 prior to the derailment incident.: During the southbound run from Chicago, the #2 engine on locomotive #4031 failed and could not be repaired at that time.

The traction motor on the front truck of #4031 seized, causing the wheels to lock.

Answer: False

The critical mechanical failure involved the traction motor on the *rear* truck of locomotive #4031 seizing, which subsequently caused the wheels to lock.

Related Concepts:

  • Identify the specific component failure within the locomotive that precipitated the locking of the wheels.: The investigation determined that the traction motor on the rear truck of #4031 had seized prior to the accident, causing the wheels to lock.
  • Identify the specific component of locomotive #4031 that seized, initiating the chain of events leading to the derailment.: The traction motor on the rear truck of locomotive #4031 seized, which was the critical mechanical failure.

The wheels likely locked up during a station stop in Effingham, Illinois, creating a false flange.

Answer: True

The wheels are believed to have locked up during a station stop in Effingham, Illinois, resulting in the development of a false flange.

Related Concepts:

  • At which location are the wheels believed to have locked up, and what resulting condition did this create on the wheel?: The wheels likely locked up at Effingham, Illinois, during a station stop. This prolonged sliding created a false flange on the wheel.
  • What specific evidence is illustrated by the caption 'Flat spots on a wheel on #4031's rear truck'?: This caption points to photographic evidence showing the damaged condition of the wheels on the rear truck of locomotive #4031, specifically highlighting the flat areas caused by sliding, which was a key finding in the investigation.

The false flange developed on locomotive #4031's wheel caused it to derail when encountering a curve.

Answer: False

The false flange, a consequence of the locked and sliding wheel, caused the derailment when the locomotive encountered a crossover switch at Tonti, not simply a curve.

Related Concepts:

  • Explain the causal relationship between the false flange and the derailment event at Tonti.: When the compromised wheel, which had developed a false flange due to sliding, encountered the switch at the crossover in Tonti, it caused the locomotive to derail.
  • At which location are the wheels believed to have locked up, and what resulting condition did this create on the wheel?: The wheels likely locked up at Effingham, Illinois, during a station stop. This prolonged sliding created a false flange on the wheel.

Locomotive #4031 had experienced engine trouble on its previous trip from Chicago to New Orleans on June 6.

Answer: True

Locomotive #4031 had experienced engine trouble on its previous trip from Chicago to New Orleans on June 6.

Related Concepts:

  • Describe the mechanical issue that locomotive #4031 encountered during its preceding trip on June 6.: On the June 6 trip from Chicago to New Orleans, locomotive #4031's #2 engine had also failed.
  • Describe the specific mechanical malfunction encountered by the #2 engine of locomotive #4031 prior to the derailment incident.: During the southbound run from Chicago, the #2 engine on locomotive #4031 failed and could not be repaired at that time.

To prevent further issues after the June 6 incident, the reverser for the #1 engine was locked in neutral.

Answer: False

To prevent further issues after the June 6 incident, the reverser for the #2 engine was locked in neutral, not the #1 engine.

Related Concepts:

  • What specific precautionary measure was implemented concerning locomotive #4031's reverser following the June 6 incident?: To prevent further issues, the reverser for the #2 engine was locked in neutral for the trip back to Chicago.
  • Describe the mechanical issue that locomotive #4031 encountered during its preceding trip on June 6.: On the June 6 trip from Chicago to New Orleans, locomotive #4031's #2 engine had also failed.

Locking the reverser in neutral improved the functionality of the wheel slip indicator.

Answer: False

Locking the reverser in neutral critically *disabled* the wheel slip indicator, thereby removing a crucial safety alert for the engineer.

Related Concepts:

  • Articulate the direct consequence of locking the reverser mechanism in neutral.: Locking the reverser in neutral disabled the wheel slip indicator, which normally alerts the locomotive engineer to wheels that are slipping or sliding.

A 'false flange' is a normal component of a railroad wheel designed to guide it through switches.

Answer: False

A 'false flange' is *not* a normal component; it is an abnormal ridge or buildup on a wheel's tread, often caused by prolonged sliding, which can mimic a proper flange and lead to derailment.

Related Concepts:

  • Define the 'false flange' as it pertains to railroad wheels.: A false flange is an abnormal ridge or buildup on a wheel's tread that can mimic the function of a proper wheel flange. In this case, it was created by a locked, sliding wheel, and it caused the wheel to interact incorrectly with a track switch, leading to derailment.

The train was pulled by four EMD E-unit locomotives leased from Illinois Central.

Answer: True

The train was indeed pulled by four EMD E-unit locomotives, which were leased from the Illinois Central Railroad.

Related Concepts:

  • Identify the classification and origin of the locomotives that were assigned to pull the *City of New Orleans* train.: The train was pulled by a set of four leased Illinois Central EMD E-units, including E8A #4031 (leading), E9Bs #4109 and #4106, and E10A #2024.
  • Provide the precise model designation and manufacturing year of the lead locomotive, identified as unit #4031.: The lead locomotive, #4031, was an EMD E8A, originally manufactured in 1952.

The seized traction motor was located on the lead locomotive's front truck.

Answer: False

The seized traction motor was located on the *rear* truck of the lead locomotive (#4031), not the front truck.

Related Concepts:

  • Identify the specific component failure within the locomotive that precipitated the locking of the wheels.: The investigation determined that the traction motor on the rear truck of #4031 had seized prior to the accident, causing the wheels to lock.
  • Identify the specific component of locomotive #4031 that seized, initiating the chain of events leading to the derailment.: The traction motor on the rear truck of locomotive #4031 seized, which was the critical mechanical failure.

What type of locomotives were pulling the train?

Answer: Illinois Central EMD E-units

The train was pulled by a consist of four EMD E-unit locomotives, which were leased from the Illinois Central Railroad.

Related Concepts:

  • Identify the classification and origin of the locomotives that were assigned to pull the *City of New Orleans* train.: The train was pulled by a set of four leased Illinois Central EMD E-units, including E8A #4031 (leading), E9Bs #4109 and #4106, and E10A #2024.
  • Provide the precise model designation and manufacturing year of the lead locomotive, identified as unit #4031.: The lead locomotive, #4031, was an EMD E8A, originally manufactured in 1952.

What was the specific model of the lead locomotive, #4031?

Answer: EMD E8A

The lead locomotive, unit #4031, was an EMD E8A model, manufactured in 1952.

Related Concepts:

  • Provide the precise model designation and manufacturing year of the lead locomotive, identified as unit #4031.: The lead locomotive, #4031, was an EMD E8A, originally manufactured in 1952.
  • Identify the specific component of locomotive #4031 that seized, initiating the chain of events leading to the derailment.: The traction motor on the rear truck of locomotive #4031 seized, which was the critical mechanical failure.

Which engine on locomotive #4031 experienced a mechanical failure during the trip?

Answer: The #2 engine

The #2 engine on locomotive #4031 experienced a critical mechanical failure during the southbound transit from Chicago.

Related Concepts:

  • Describe the specific mechanical malfunction encountered by the #2 engine of locomotive #4031 prior to the derailment incident.: During the southbound run from Chicago, the #2 engine on locomotive #4031 failed and could not be repaired at that time.
  • Describe the mechanical issue that locomotive #4031 encountered during its preceding trip on June 6.: On the June 6 trip from Chicago to New Orleans, locomotive #4031's #2 engine had also failed.
  • Identify the specific component of locomotive #4031 that seized, initiating the chain of events leading to the derailment.: The traction motor on the rear truck of locomotive #4031 seized, which was the critical mechanical failure.

What condition did the wheels on locomotive #4031's rear truck develop due to prolonged sliding?

Answer: A false flange.

As a consequence of prolonged sliding, the wheels on locomotive #4031's rear truck developed a false flange, an abnormal ridge that mimicked a proper flange.

Related Concepts:

  • What specific evidence is illustrated by the caption 'Flat spots on a wheel on #4031's rear truck'?: This caption points to photographic evidence showing the damaged condition of the wheels on the rear truck of locomotive #4031, specifically highlighting the flat areas caused by sliding, which was a key finding in the investigation.
  • At which location are the wheels believed to have locked up, and what resulting condition did this create on the wheel?: The wheels likely locked up at Effingham, Illinois, during a station stop. This prolonged sliding created a false flange on the wheel.

Where did the wheels of locomotive #4031 likely lock up, causing them to slide?

Answer: Effingham

The wheels are believed to have locked up during a station stop in Effingham, Illinois, initiating the prolonged slide that led to the false flange.

Related Concepts:

  • What specific evidence is illustrated by the caption 'Flat spots on a wheel on #4031's rear truck'?: This caption points to photographic evidence showing the damaged condition of the wheels on the rear truck of locomotive #4031, specifically highlighting the flat areas caused by sliding, which was a key finding in the investigation.
  • At which location are the wheels believed to have locked up, and what resulting condition did this create on the wheel?: The wheels likely locked up at Effingham, Illinois, during a station stop. This prolonged sliding created a false flange on the wheel.

How did the false flange on the wheel lead to the derailment?

Answer: It caused the wheel to improperly interact with the crossover switch.

The false flange, a consequence of the locked and sliding wheel, caused the derailment when the compromised wheel encountered the crossover switch at Tonti, leading to improper guidance and derailment.

Related Concepts:

  • Explain the causal relationship between the false flange and the derailment event at Tonti.: When the compromised wheel, which had developed a false flange due to sliding, encountered the switch at the crossover in Tonti, it caused the locomotive to derail.

What safety device was rendered ineffective due to the reverser being locked in neutral?

Answer: Wheel slip indicator

Locking the reverser in neutral critically disabled the wheel slip indicator, thereby removing a crucial safety alert for the engineer regarding wheel slippage or sliding.

Related Concepts:

  • Articulate the direct consequence of locking the reverser mechanism in neutral.: Locking the reverser in neutral disabled the wheel slip indicator, which normally alerts the locomotive engineer to wheels that are slipping or sliding.

What is the purpose of a wheel slip indicator?

Answer: To alert the engineer if wheels are rotating too fast or sliding.

A wheel slip indicator is a critical safety device designed to alert the locomotive engineer when a wheel is rotating too fast or sliding on the tracks, which can lead to damage and hazardous conditions.

Related Concepts:

  • Describe the primary function of a wheel slip indicator in locomotive operation.: A wheel slip indicator is a safety device that alerts the locomotive engineer when a wheel is rotating too fast or sliding on the tracks, which can cause damage and lead to accidents.

What specific part of locomotive #4031 failed, initiating the sequence of events leading to the derailment?

Answer: The traction motor on the rear truck

The traction motor on the rear truck of locomotive #4031 seized, thereby initiating the chain of events that culminated in the derailment.

Related Concepts:

  • Identify the specific component of locomotive #4031 that seized, initiating the chain of events leading to the derailment.: The traction motor on the rear truck of locomotive #4031 seized, which was the critical mechanical failure.
  • Summarize the findings of the NTSB investigation concerning the condition of the wheels on locomotive #4031's rear truck.: The NTSB investigation discovered flat spots on the wheels of the rear truck of locomotive #4031.

What was the approximate horsepower rating of the EMD E8A locomotive #4031?

Answer: 2,250 hp

The EMD E8A locomotive, unit #4031, had an approximate horsepower rating of 2,250 hp.

Related Concepts:

  • What was the rated horsepower of the EMD E8A locomotive, unit #4031?: The EMD E8A locomotive #4031 developed 2,250 horsepower (1,680 kW).
  • Provide the precise model designation and manufacturing year of the lead locomotive, identified as unit #4031.: The lead locomotive, #4031, was an EMD E8A, originally manufactured in 1952.

Why was the failure of the #2 engine on locomotive #4031 particularly problematic?

Answer: It led to the disabling of the wheel slip indicator when its reverser was locked.

The failure of the #2 engine was particularly problematic because locking its reverser in neutral, a measure taken to mitigate the failure, subsequently disabled the wheel slip indicator, removing a critical safety alert.

Related Concepts:

  • Describe the specific mechanical malfunction encountered by the #2 engine of locomotive #4031 prior to the derailment incident.: During the southbound run from Chicago, the #2 engine on locomotive #4031 failed and could not be repaired at that time.
  • Articulate the direct consequence of locking the reverser mechanism in neutral.: Locking the reverser in neutral disabled the wheel slip indicator, which normally alerts the locomotive engineer to wheels that are slipping or sliding.
  • Identify the specific component of locomotive #4031 that seized, initiating the chain of events leading to the derailment.: The traction motor on the rear truck of locomotive #4031 seized, which was the critical mechanical failure.

NTSB Investigation and Findings

The National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) determined the derailment was caused by a signal malfunction.

Answer: False

The NTSB investigation concluded that the derailment was caused by mechanical failure, specifically a false flange on a wheel due to a seized axle bearing, not a signal malfunction.

Related Concepts:

  • According to the National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) investigation, what was identified as the primary mechanical cause of the 1971 Salem, Illinois derailment?: The National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) investigation concluded that the derailment was caused by a mechanical fault on the lead engine, specifically a false flange on a flat wheel that resulted from a seized axle bearing.
  • What was the National Transportation Safety Board's definitive conclusion regarding the probable cause of the derailment?: The NTSB concluded that mechanical faults within Illinois Central locomotive #4031 were the cause of the derailment.

The NTSB investigation found no significant issues with the wheels on locomotive #4031's rear truck.

Answer: False

Contrary to the assertion, the NTSB investigation *did* find significant issues, specifically flat spots, on the wheels of locomotive #4031's rear truck.

Related Concepts:

  • Summarize the findings of the NTSB investigation concerning the condition of the wheels on locomotive #4031's rear truck.: The NTSB investigation discovered flat spots on the wheels of the rear truck of locomotive #4031.
  • What specific evidence is illustrated by the caption 'Flat spots on a wheel on #4031's rear truck'?: This caption points to photographic evidence showing the damaged condition of the wheels on the rear truck of locomotive #4031, specifically highlighting the flat areas caused by sliding, which was a key finding in the investigation.

Markings on the tracks indicated that the wheels on #4031 had spun excessively rather than slid.

Answer: False

Evidence from track markings indicated that the wheels on #4031 had experienced prolonged sliding, not excessive spinning.

Related Concepts:

  • What specific evidence found at the scene indicated that the locomotive's wheels had experienced sliding rather than spinning?: Markings found on the tracks between Tonti and Effingham, Illinois, suggested that the wheels had slid instead of spinning.
  • What specific evidence is illustrated by the caption 'Flat spots on a wheel on #4031's rear truck'?: This caption points to photographic evidence showing the damaged condition of the wheels on the rear truck of locomotive #4031, specifically highlighting the flat areas caused by sliding, which was a key finding in the investigation.

Illinois Central maintenance forces correctly identified the locked reverser during repairs in Chicago.

Answer: False

Illinois Central maintenance personnel failed to identify the locked reverser on locomotive #4031 during repairs in Chicago.

Related Concepts:

  • Detail the oversight committed by Illinois Central maintenance personnel during the servicing of locomotive #4031 in Chicago.: During the repair process in Chicago, Illinois Central maintenance forces failed to notice that the reverser was locked and did not realize that the rear truck was not receiving power.
  • What was the National Transportation Safety Board's definitive conclusion regarding the probable cause of the derailment?: The NTSB concluded that mechanical faults within Illinois Central locomotive #4031 were the cause of the derailment.

According to the NTSB, what was the direct mechanical cause of the derailment?

Answer: A seized axle bearing causing a flat wheel and false flange.

The NTSB's comprehensive investigation concluded that the direct mechanical cause of the derailment was a seized axle bearing on the lead locomotive's rear truck, which led to a flat wheel and subsequently a false flange.

Related Concepts:

  • According to the National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) investigation, what was identified as the primary mechanical cause of the 1971 Salem, Illinois derailment?: The National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) investigation concluded that the derailment was caused by a mechanical fault on the lead engine, specifically a false flange on a flat wheel that resulted from a seized axle bearing.
  • Summarize the findings of the NTSB investigation concerning the condition of the wheels on locomotive #4031's rear truck.: The NTSB investigation discovered flat spots on the wheels of the rear truck of locomotive #4031.
  • Identify the specific component failure within the locomotive that precipitated the locking of the wheels.: The investigation determined that the traction motor on the rear truck of #4031 had seized prior to the accident, causing the wheels to lock.

What oversight did Illinois Central maintenance personnel make regarding locomotive #4031?

Answer: They failed to notice the reverser was locked in neutral.

Illinois Central maintenance personnel committed a significant oversight by failing to notice that the reverser on locomotive #4031 was locked in neutral during repairs in Chicago.

Related Concepts:

  • Detail the oversight committed by Illinois Central maintenance personnel during the servicing of locomotive #4031 in Chicago.: During the repair process in Chicago, Illinois Central maintenance forces failed to notice that the reverser was locked and did not realize that the rear truck was not receiving power.
  • What was the National Transportation Safety Board's definitive conclusion regarding the probable cause of the derailment?: The NTSB concluded that mechanical faults within Illinois Central locomotive #4031 were the cause of the derailment.

Which organization is responsible for investigating major transportation accidents in the US and issuing safety recommendations?

Answer: National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB)

The National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) is the federal agency constitutionally mandated to investigate major transportation accidents within the United States and subsequently issue safety recommendations.

Related Concepts:

  • Elucidate the role played by the National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) in investigating incidents of this nature.: The NTSB is responsible for investigating major transportation accidents, determining their probable cause, and issuing safety recommendations to prevent future occurrences.
  • Define the Federal Railroad Administration (FRA) and its mandate.: The Federal Railroad Administration (FRA) is an agency within the U.S. Department of Transportation responsible for developing and enforcing railroad safety regulations.

The NTSB investigation identified flat spots on the wheels of which part of locomotive #4031?

Answer: The rear truck

The NTSB investigation identified the presence of flat spots on the wheels located on the *rear* truck of locomotive #4031.

Related Concepts:

  • Summarize the findings of the NTSB investigation concerning the condition of the wheels on locomotive #4031's rear truck.: The NTSB investigation discovered flat spots on the wheels of the rear truck of locomotive #4031.
  • What specific evidence is illustrated by the caption 'Flat spots on a wheel on #4031's rear truck'?: This caption points to photographic evidence showing the damaged condition of the wheels on the rear truck of locomotive #4031, specifically highlighting the flat areas caused by sliding, which was a key finding in the investigation.

The image caption 'Flat spots on a wheel on #4031's rear truck' refers to what key piece of evidence?

Answer: Visual evidence of the wheel sliding.

The descriptive caption 'Flat spots on a wheel on #4031's rear truck' refers to critical physical evidence uncovered during the investigation, specifically visual confirmation of the prolonged wheel sliding that occurred.

Related Concepts:

  • What specific evidence is illustrated by the caption 'Flat spots on a wheel on #4031's rear truck'?: This caption points to photographic evidence showing the damaged condition of the wheels on the rear truck of locomotive #4031, specifically highlighting the flat areas caused by sliding, which was a key finding in the investigation.
  • Summarize the findings of the NTSB investigation concerning the condition of the wheels on locomotive #4031's rear truck.: The NTSB investigation discovered flat spots on the wheels of the rear truck of locomotive #4031.

Consequences and Impact

The 1971 Salem, Illinois derailment resulted in 11 fatalities and 163 injuries.

Answer: True

The 1971 Salem, Illinois derailment resulted in 11 fatalities and 163 reported injuries.

Related Concepts:

  • What specific transportation incident is comprehensively detailed within the provided textual data?: The provided text details the 1971 Salem, Illinois derailment, a significant train crash that occurred on June 10, 1971.
  • Quantify the number of fatalities that resulted directly from the 1971 Salem, Illinois derailment.: The derailment resulted in 11 deaths.
  • Quantify the number of individuals who sustained injuries during the 1971 Salem, Illinois derailment.: A total of 163 people sustained injuries in the incident.

This incident was the second fatal accident experienced by Amtrak since its inception.

Answer: False

This incident was Amtrak's first fatal accident since its inception on May 1, 1971.

Related Concepts:

  • Articulate the historical significance of this particular derailment event for the newly established Amtrak corporation.: The 1971 Salem, Illinois derailment marked Amtrak's first fatal accident since it took over the operation of most intercity passenger trains in the United States on May 1, 1971.
  • Elaborate on the significance of the train being operated by Amtrak, considering its status as a newly formed entity in 1971.: The text notes that Amtrak had only recently assumed control of most intercity passenger rail services, making this derailment its first fatal accident and highlighting the challenges of integrating operations from previous railroad companies.

None of the passengers were ejected from the train during the derailment.

Answer: False

Six passengers were ejected through the train's large side windows during the derailment, contributing to the fatalities.

Related Concepts:

  • Explain the mechanism through which some of the fatalities occurred during the derailment event.: Six of the eleven fatalities occurred when passengers were ejected through the train's large side windows.

The second locomotive, #4109, caught fire and was completely destroyed.

Answer: True

The second locomotive in the consist, unit #4109, sustained catastrophic damage, including catching fire and being completely destroyed.

Related Concepts:

  • Provide a detailed description of the damage incurred by the locomotives and passenger cars as a result of the derailment.: The lead locomotive, #4031, was badly damaged. The second locomotive, #4109, caught fire and was destroyed. The rear two locomotives remained upright with minimal damage. The lead baggage car and the first five coaches were destroyed, while the remaining eight cars suffered varying degrees of damage.

How many people lost their lives in the 1971 Salem, Illinois derailment?

Answer: 11

The 1971 Salem, Illinois derailment resulted in 11 fatalities.

Related Concepts:

  • Quantify the number of fatalities that resulted directly from the 1971 Salem, Illinois derailment.: The derailment resulted in 11 deaths.
  • What specific transportation incident is comprehensively detailed within the provided textual data?: The provided text details the 1971 Salem, Illinois derailment, a significant train crash that occurred on June 10, 1971.

What significant milestone did this derailment represent for Amtrak?

Answer: It was Amtrak's first fatal accident since beginning operations.

This derailment represented a significant, albeit tragic, milestone for the nascent Amtrak corporation, marking its first fatal accident since commencing operations on May 1, 1971.

Related Concepts:

  • Articulate the historical significance of this particular derailment event for the newly established Amtrak corporation.: The 1971 Salem, Illinois derailment marked Amtrak's first fatal accident since it took over the operation of most intercity passenger trains in the United States on May 1, 1971.
  • Elaborate on the significance of the train being operated by Amtrak, considering its status as a newly formed entity in 1971.: The text notes that Amtrak had only recently assumed control of most intercity passenger rail services, making this derailment its first fatal accident and highlighting the challenges of integrating operations from previous railroad companies.

What was the condition of the two rear locomotives after the derailment?

Answer: They remained upright with minimal damage.

The two rear locomotives in the train consist remained upright and sustained minimal damage following the derailment event.

Related Concepts:

  • Describe the condition of the two rear locomotives following the derailment event.: The two rear locomotives remained upright and suffered little damage following the derailment.
  • Provide a detailed description of the damage incurred by the locomotives and passenger cars as a result of the derailment.: The lead locomotive, #4031, was badly damaged. The second locomotive, #4109, caught fire and was destroyed. The rear two locomotives remained upright with minimal damage. The lead baggage car and the first five coaches were destroyed, while the remaining eight cars suffered varying degrees of damage.

What was the fate of the lead locomotive, #4031, after the derailment?

Answer: It was badly damaged but remained upright.

The lead locomotive, unit #4031, sustained significant damage subsequent to the derailment event but remained upright.

Related Concepts:

  • Provide a detailed description of the damage incurred by the locomotives and passenger cars as a result of the derailment.: The lead locomotive, #4031, was badly damaged. The second locomotive, #4109, caught fire and was destroyed. The rear two locomotives remained upright with minimal damage. The lead baggage car and the first five coaches were destroyed, while the remaining eight cars suffered varying degrees of damage.
  • Summarize the findings of the NTSB investigation concerning the condition of the wheels on locomotive #4031's rear truck.: The NTSB investigation discovered flat spots on the wheels of the rear truck of locomotive #4031.

The derailment occurred approximately how long after Amtrak began operating passenger services?

Answer: Less than one month

Amtrak commenced passenger operations on May 1, 1971, making this derailment, which occurred on June 10, 1971, approximately less than one month later.

Related Concepts:

  • Articulate the historical significance of this particular derailment event for the newly established Amtrak corporation.: The 1971 Salem, Illinois derailment marked Amtrak's first fatal accident since it took over the operation of most intercity passenger trains in the United States on May 1, 1971.
  • Elaborate on the significance of the train being operated by Amtrak, considering its status as a newly formed entity in 1971.: The text notes that Amtrak had only recently assumed control of most intercity passenger rail services, making this derailment its first fatal accident and highlighting the challenges of integrating operations from previous railroad companies.

Safety Recommendations and Subsequent Actions

The NTSB recommended improvements to locomotive wheel-slip detection devices.

Answer: True

The NTSB issued recommendations for enhancements to locomotive wheel-slip detection systems.

Related Concepts:

  • Specify the NTSB's recommendations pertaining to improvements in locomotive safety devices.: The NTSB recommended improvements to wheel-slip detection devices used on locomotives.
  • What procedural enhancements did the NTSB propose in the wake of its investigation?: The NTSB recommended enhancements to pre-departure testing procedures for trains.

The NTSB did not make any recommendations regarding pre-departure testing procedures.

Answer: False

The NTSB *did* make recommendations concerning pre-departure testing procedures, advocating for their enhancement.

Related Concepts:

  • What procedural enhancements did the NTSB propose in the wake of its investigation?: The NTSB recommended enhancements to pre-departure testing procedures for trains.

The NTSB urged the FRA to develop safety standards for passenger ejection prevention.

Answer: True

The NTSB formally urged the Federal Railroad Administration (FRA) to establish safety standards aimed at preventing passenger ejection through windows.

Related Concepts:

  • Identify the specific safety standard the NTSB urged the Federal Railroad Administration (FRA) to develop.: The NTSB recommended that the Federal Railroad Administration (FRA) draft safety standards to address the issue of passengers being ejected through windows during accidents.
  • What procedural enhancements did the NTSB propose in the wake of its investigation?: The NTSB recommended enhancements to pre-departure testing procedures for trains.

The NTSB recommended that the FRA develop standards for locomotive horsepower.

Answer: False

The NTSB's recommendations did not include developing standards for locomotive horsepower; rather, they focused on other safety aspects like passenger ejection prevention and testing procedures.

Related Concepts:

  • What specific recommendation did the NTSB issue concerning passenger safety protocols in the event of train accidents?: The NTSB recommended that the Federal Railroad Administration (FRA) develop safety standards to prevent passengers from being ejected through windows during accidents.
  • What procedural enhancements did the NTSB propose in the wake of its investigation?: The NTSB recommended enhancements to pre-departure testing procedures for trains.

What specific safety standard did the NTSB recommend the FRA develop?

Answer: Standards to prevent passengers from being ejected through windows.

The NTSB recommended that the Federal Railroad Administration (FRA) develop specific safety standards aimed at preventing passengers from being ejected through windows during accidents.

Related Concepts:

  • Identify the specific safety standard the NTSB urged the Federal Railroad Administration (FRA) to develop.: The NTSB recommended that the Federal Railroad Administration (FRA) draft safety standards to address the issue of passengers being ejected through windows during accidents.
  • What procedural enhancements did the NTSB propose in the wake of its investigation?: The NTSB recommended enhancements to pre-departure testing procedures for trains.

What did the NTSB recommend regarding pre-departure train testing?

Answer: Enhance pre-departure testing procedures.

The NTSB recommended enhancing pre-departure testing procedures for trains to improve safety and prevent future incidents.

Related Concepts:

  • What procedural enhancements did the NTSB propose in the wake of its investigation?: The NTSB recommended enhancements to pre-departure testing procedures for trains.

Which of the following was NOT among the recommendations made by the NTSB?

Answer: Mandating the use of specific locomotive models.

Mandating the use of specific locomotive models was explicitly excluded from the safety recommendations issued by the NTSB following their investigation.

Related Concepts:

  • What procedural enhancements did the NTSB propose in the wake of its investigation?: The NTSB recommended enhancements to pre-departure testing procedures for trains.
  • What specific recommendation did the NTSB issue concerning passenger safety protocols in the event of train accidents?: The NTSB recommended that the Federal Railroad Administration (FRA) develop safety standards to prevent passengers from being ejected through windows during accidents.
  • Specify the NTSB's recommendations pertaining to improvements in locomotive safety devices.: The NTSB recommended improvements to wheel-slip detection devices used on locomotives.

What was the primary function of the Federal Railroad Administration (FRA) mentioned in the NTSB recommendations?

Answer: To develop and enforce railroad safety regulations.

The primary regulatory function of the Federal Railroad Administration (FRA), as referenced in the context of the NTSB recommendations, is to develop and enforce railroad safety regulations.

Related Concepts:

  • Define the Federal Railroad Administration (FRA) and its mandate.: The Federal Railroad Administration (FRA) is an agency within the U.S. Department of Transportation responsible for developing and enforcing railroad safety regulations.
  • What procedural enhancements did the NTSB propose in the wake of its investigation?: The NTSB recommended enhancements to pre-departure testing procedures for trains.

Unidentified Victims and Identification Efforts

X-rays during an exhumation revealed multiple unidentified victims in the grave intended for one person.

Answer: True

Subsequent exhumation and radiographic analysis revealed that the grave designated for a single unidentified decedent actually contained multiple individuals, including what appeared to be a child.

Related Concepts:

  • What unexpected finding emerged during the exhumation process concerning the grave of the unidentified decedent?: During the exhumation of the grave intended for the single unidentified decedent, X-rays revealed the presence of at least two, and possibly three, unidentified victims within the same grave, including what appeared to be a child.

The DNA Doe Project is assisting in identifying the remains of unknown victims from the crash.

Answer: True

The DNA Doe Project, a specialized organization, has lent its expertise to the ongoing effort of identifying the remains of unknown victims associated with the crash.

Related Concepts:

  • Explain the significance of the reference to the DNA Doe Project in the context of the crash investigation.: The DNA Doe Project, an organization specializing in identifying unidentified individuals using genetic genealogy, has become involved in the ongoing investigation to identify the remains found in the grave of an unknown victim from the crash.
  • Which specialized organization has joined the investigation concerning the unidentified remains?: The DNA Doe Project has joined the investigation into the unidentified remains found in the grave of an unknown victim from the crash.

What unexpected finding emerged during the exhumation related to the unidentified victim?

Answer: The grave held multiple unidentified individuals, possibly including a child.

During the exhumation process concerning the grave of the unidentified decedent, an unexpected discovery revealed the presence of multiple individuals, including what appeared to be a child.

Related Concepts:

  • What unexpected finding emerged during the exhumation process concerning the grave of the unidentified decedent?: During the exhumation of the grave intended for the single unidentified decedent, X-rays revealed the presence of at least two, and possibly three, unidentified victims within the same grave, including what appeared to be a child.

What organization has joined the effort to identify the unknown victim(s) using genetic genealogy?

Answer: The DNA Doe Project

The DNA Doe Project, a specialized organization, has joined the investigative efforts to identify the unknown victim(s) through the application of genetic genealogy.

Related Concepts:

  • Explain the significance of the reference to the DNA Doe Project in the context of the crash investigation.: The DNA Doe Project, an organization specializing in identifying unidentified individuals using genetic genealogy, has become involved in the ongoing investigation to identify the remains found in the grave of an unknown victim from the crash.
  • Which specialized organization has joined the investigation concerning the unidentified remains?: The DNA Doe Project has joined the investigation into the unidentified remains found in the grave of an unknown victim from the crash.

Home | Sitemaps | Contact | Terms | Privacy