Wiki2Web Studio

Create complete, beautiful interactive educational materials in less than 5 minutes.

Print flashcards, homework worksheets, exams/quizzes, study guides, & more.

Export your learner materials as an interactive game, a webpage, or FAQ style cheatsheet.

Unsaved Work Found!

It looks like you have unsaved work from a previous session. Would you like to restore it?



The 1976 Zagreb Mid-Air Collision

At a Glance

Title: The 1976 Zagreb Mid-Air Collision

Total Categories: 6

Category Stats

  • The Zagreb Air Disaster: Incident Overview: 5 flashcards, 11 questions
  • Aircraft and Flight Specifics: 15 flashcards, 22 questions
  • Air Traffic Control and Procedural Failures: 16 flashcards, 14 questions
  • Human Factors and Crew Experience: 2 flashcards, 3 questions
  • Consequences and Historical Significance: 11 flashcards, 15 questions
  • Investigations and Media Documentation: 7 flashcards, 2 questions

Total Stats

  • Total Flashcards: 56
  • True/False Questions: 42
  • Multiple Choice Questions: 25
  • Total Questions: 67

Instructions

Click the button to expand the instructions for how to use the Wiki2Web Teacher studio in order to print, edit, and export data about The 1976 Zagreb Mid-Air Collision

Welcome to Your Curriculum Command Center

This guide will turn you into a Wiki2web Studio power user. Let's unlock the features designed to give you back your weekends.

The Core Concept: What is a "Kit"?

Think of a Kit as your all-in-one digital lesson plan. It's a single, portable file that contains every piece of content for a topic: your subject categories, a central image, all your flashcards, and all your questions. The true power of the Studio is speed—once a kit is made (or you import one), you are just minutes away from printing an entire set of coursework.

Getting Started is Simple:

  • Create New Kit: Start with a clean slate. Perfect for a brand-new lesson idea.
  • Import & Edit Existing Kit: Load a .json kit file from your computer to continue your work or to modify a kit created by a colleague.
  • Restore Session: The Studio automatically saves your progress in your browser. If you get interrupted, you can restore your unsaved work with one click.

Step 1: Laying the Foundation (The Authoring Tools)

This is where you build the core knowledge of your Kit. Use the left-side navigation panel to switch between these powerful authoring modules.

⚙️ Kit Manager: Your Kit's Identity

This is the high-level control panel for your project.

  • Kit Name: Give your Kit a clear title. This will appear on all your printed materials.
  • Master Image: Upload a custom cover image for your Kit. This is essential for giving your content a professional visual identity, and it's used as the main graphic when you export your Kit as an interactive game.
  • Topics: Create the structure for your lesson. Add topics like "Chapter 1," "Vocabulary," or "Key Formulas." All flashcards and questions will be organized under these topics.

🃏 Flashcard Author: Building the Knowledge Blocks

Flashcards are the fundamental concepts of your Kit. Create them here to define terms, list facts, or pose simple questions.

  • Click "➕ Add New Flashcard" to open the editor.
  • Fill in the term/question and the definition/answer.
  • Assign the flashcard to one of your pre-defined topics.
  • To edit or remove a flashcard, simply use the ✏️ (Edit) or ❌ (Delete) icons next to any entry in the list.

✍️ Question Author: Assessing Understanding

Create a bank of questions to test knowledge. These questions are the engine for your worksheets and exams.

  • Click "➕ Add New Question".
  • Choose a Type: True/False for quick checks or Multiple Choice for more complex assessments.
  • To edit an existing question, click the ✏️ icon. You can change the question text, options, correct answer, and explanation at any time.
  • The Explanation field is a powerful tool: the text you enter here will automatically appear on the teacher's answer key and on the Smart Study Guide, providing instant feedback.

🔗 Intelligent Mapper: The Smart Connection

This is the secret sauce of the Studio. The Mapper transforms your content from a simple list into an interconnected web of knowledge, automating the creation of amazing study guides.

  • Step 1: Select a question from the list on the left.
  • Step 2: In the right panel, click on every flashcard that contains a concept required to answer that question. They will turn green, indicating a successful link.
  • The Payoff: When you generate a Smart Study Guide, these linked flashcards will automatically appear under each question as "Related Concepts."

Step 2: The Magic (The Generator Suite)

You've built your content. Now, with a few clicks, turn it into a full suite of professional, ready-to-use materials. What used to take hours of formatting and copying-and-pasting can now be done in seconds.

🎓 Smart Study Guide Maker

Instantly create the ultimate review document. It combines your questions, the correct answers, your detailed explanations, and all the "Related Concepts" you linked in the Mapper into one cohesive, printable guide.

📝 Worksheet & 📄 Exam Builder

Generate unique assessments every time. The questions and multiple-choice options are randomized automatically. Simply select your topics, choose how many questions you need, and generate:

  • A Student Version, clean and ready for quizzing.
  • A Teacher Version, complete with a detailed answer key and the explanations you wrote.

🖨️ Flashcard Printer

Forget wrestling with table layouts in a word processor. Select a topic, choose a cards-per-page layout, and instantly generate perfectly formatted, print-ready flashcard sheets.

Step 3: Saving and Collaborating

  • 💾 Export & Save Kit: This is your primary save function. It downloads the entire Kit (content, images, and all) to your computer as a single .json file. Use this to create permanent backups and share your work with others.
  • ➕ Import & Merge Kit: Combine your work. You can merge a colleague's Kit into your own or combine two of your lessons into a larger review Kit.

You're now ready to reclaim your time.

You're not just a teacher; you're a curriculum designer, and this is your Studio.

This page is an interactive visualization based on the Wikipedia article "1976 Zagreb mid-air collision" (opens in new tab) and its cited references.

Text content is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License (opens in new tab). Additional terms may apply.

Disclaimer: This website is for informational purposes only and does not constitute any kind of advice. The information is not a substitute for consulting official sources or records or seeking advice from qualified professionals.


Owned and operated by Artificial General Intelligence LLC, a Michigan Registered LLC
Prompt engineering done with Gracekits.com
All rights reserved
Sitemaps | Contact

Export Options





Study Guide: The 1976 Zagreb Mid-Air Collision

Study Guide: The 1976 Zagreb Mid-Air Collision

The Zagreb Air Disaster: Incident Overview

The mid-air collision occurred at an altitude of approximately 33,000 feet.

Answer: True

The collision took place at an altitude of approximately 33,000 feet, which corresponds to Flight Level 330.

Related Concepts:

  • At what altitude did the two aircraft collide?: The mid-air collision occurred at Flight Level 330, approximately 33,000 feet (10,000 meters).

The collision happened on September 10, 1976, at 10:14:41 UTC.

Answer: True

The mid-air collision occurred precisely at 10:14:41 UTC on September 10, 1976.

Related Concepts:

  • What was the date of the 1976 Zagreb mid-air collision?: The 1976 Zagreb mid-air collision occurred on September 10, 1976.
  • At what precise time did the mid-air collision occur?: The mid-air collision occurred at 10:14:41 UTC.

The collision occurred over Samoborec, Croatia, within Yugoslavian airspace.

Answer: True

The collision took place over Samoborec, a location within Croatia, which was then part of Yugoslavia.

Related Concepts:

  • Where did the 1976 Zagreb mid-air collision take place?: The collision occurred near Zagreb, specifically over Samoborec in Croatia, which was then part of Yugoslavia.

The collision involved the wingtip of the DC-9 striking the forward section of the Trident's fuselage.

Answer: True

The impact occurred when the last five meters of the DC-9's left wing collided with the Trident's cockpit and forward passenger compartment.

Related Concepts:

  • Describe the nature of the physical contact between the two aircraft during the collision.: The collision involved the last five meters of the DC-9's left wing striking the Trident's cockpit section and forward passenger compartment.

The collision occurred at Flight Level 330, approximately 33,000 feet.

Answer: True

The collision took place at an altitude of approximately 33,000 feet, corresponding to Flight Level 330.

Related Concepts:

  • At what altitude did the two aircraft collide?: The mid-air collision occurred at Flight Level 330, approximately 33,000 feet (10,000 meters).

The collision happened over Yugoslavia.

Answer: True

The collision occurred over Samoborec, Croatia, which was part of Yugoslavia at the time.

Related Concepts:

  • Where did the 1976 Zagreb mid-air collision take place?: The collision occurred near Zagreb, specifically over Samoborec in Croatia, which was then part of Yugoslavia.

The collision occurred at 10:14:41 UTC on September 10, 1976.

Answer: True

The mid-air collision occurred precisely at 10:14:41 UTC on September 10, 1976.

Related Concepts:

  • What was the date of the 1976 Zagreb mid-air collision?: The 1976 Zagreb mid-air collision occurred on September 10, 1976.
  • At what precise time did the mid-air collision occur?: The mid-air collision occurred at 10:14:41 UTC.

The collision happened at an altitude of approximately 10,000 meters.

Answer: False

The collision occurred at approximately 33,000 feet, not 10,000 meters. 33,000 feet is approximately 10,000 meters, but the primary unit used in aviation for this altitude is feet.

Related Concepts:

  • At what altitude did the two aircraft collide?: The mid-air collision occurred at Flight Level 330, approximately 33,000 feet (10,000 meters).

What was the date of the catastrophic mid-air collision near Zagreb?

Answer: September 10, 1976

The catastrophic mid-air collision near Zagreb occurred on September 10, 1976.

Related Concepts:

  • What was the date of the 1976 Zagreb mid-air collision?: The 1976 Zagreb mid-air collision occurred on September 10, 1976.

At what altitude did the two aircraft collide?

Answer: Approximately 33,000 feet

The mid-air collision occurred at an altitude of approximately 33,000 feet, corresponding to Flight Level 330.

Related Concepts:

  • At what altitude did the two aircraft collide?: The mid-air collision occurred at Flight Level 330, approximately 33,000 feet (10,000 meters).

Where did the 1976 Zagreb mid-air collision take place?

Answer: Over Samoborec, near Zagreb, Yugoslavia

The collision occurred near Zagreb, specifically over Samoborec in Croatia, which was then part of Yugoslavia.

Related Concepts:

  • Where did the 1976 Zagreb mid-air collision take place?: The collision occurred near Zagreb, specifically over Samoborec in Croatia, which was then part of Yugoslavia.

Aircraft and Flight Specifics

The mid-air collision near Zagreb in 1976 involved British Airways Flight 476 and Inex-Adria Aviopromet Flight 550.

Answer: True

The collision occurred between British Airways Flight 476 and Inex-Adria Aviopromet Flight 550.

Related Concepts:

  • Which two aircraft were involved in the mid-air collision near Zagreb on September 10, 1976?: The two aircraft involved were British Airways Flight 476 and Inex-Adria Aviopromet Flight 550.

British Airways Flight 476 was en route from London Heathrow to Istanbul Ataturk Airport when the collision occurred.

Answer: True

British Airways Flight 476 was traveling from London Heathrow Airport to Istanbul Ataturk Airport.

Related Concepts:

  • What was the intended flight path for British Airways Flight 476?: British Airways Flight 476 was scheduled to fly from London Heathrow Airport to Istanbul Ataturk Airport.
  • From where did British Airways Flight 476 originate?: British Airways Flight 476 originated from London Heathrow Airport in the United Kingdom.

Inex-Adria Aviopromet Flight 550 was a McDonnell Douglas DC-9-32 registered as YU-AJR.

Answer: True

Inex-Adria Aviopromet Flight 550 was a McDonnell Douglas DC-9-32 registered as YU-AJR.

Related Concepts:

  • What was the aircraft model and registration number for Inex-Adria Aviopromet Flight 550?: The aircraft was a McDonnell Douglas DC-9-32, registered as YU-AJR. It belonged to Inex-Adria, a charter airline based in Slovenia, Yugoslavia.

British Airways Flight 476 was a Hawker Siddeley Trident 3B.

Answer: True

British Airways Flight 476 was a Hawker Siddeley Trident 3B.

Related Concepts:

  • What was the aircraft type and registration number for British Airways Flight 476?: British Airways Flight 476 was a Hawker Siddeley Trident 3B, registered as G-AWZT. This aircraft was a former British European Airways plane and retained the 'Bealine' callsign.

Inex-Adria Flight 550 was carrying primarily German tourists returning from Yugoslavia.

Answer: True

The passengers on Inex-Adria Flight 550 were predominantly German tourists.

Related Concepts:

  • What was the total number of individuals aboard Inex-Adria Aviopromet Flight 550?: Inex-Adria Aviopromet Flight 550 carried 113 individuals, comprising 108 passengers and a crew of 5.

The 'Bealine' callsign used by BA476 was standard for British Airways at the time.

Answer: False

The standard call sign for British Airways was 'Speedbird.' BA476 used 'Bealine 476' because its aircraft was a former British European Airways plane.

Related Concepts:

  • What was the call sign used by British Airways Flight 476, and why was it considered unique?: The call sign for British Airways Flight 476 was BEALINE 476. This was because the aircraft, G-AWZT, was a former British European Airways aircraft and retained its previous callsign instead of the standard British Airways 'Speedbird' callsign.

British Airways Flight 476 carried 63 people, including 9 crew members.

Answer: True

British Airways Flight 476 carried a total of 63 individuals, comprising 54 passengers and a crew of 9.

Related Concepts:

  • How many individuals were on board British Airways Flight 476?: British Airways Flight 476 carried a total of 63 individuals, comprising 54 passengers and a crew of 9.

Inex-Adria Flight 550 originated from Split Airport.

Answer: True

Inex-Adria Flight 550's origin was Split Airport in Yugoslavia.

Related Concepts:

  • From where did Inex-Adria Aviopromet Flight 550 originate?: Inex-Adria Aviopromet Flight 550 originated from Split Airport in SR Croatia, Yugoslavia.

The call sign ADRIA 550 was used by Inex-Adria Flight 550, not British Airways Flight 476.

Answer: True

ADRIA 550 was the call sign for Inex-Adria Flight 550. British Airways Flight 476 used the call sign BEALINE 476.

Related Concepts:

  • What was the designated call sign for Inex-Adria Aviopromet Flight 550?: The call sign for Inex-Adria Aviopromet Flight 550 was ADRIA 550.

Inex-Adria was a charter airline based in Slovenia, Yugoslavia.

Answer: True

Inex-Adria was a charter airline headquartered in Slovenia, which was then part of Yugoslavia.

Related Concepts:

  • What was the aircraft model and registration number for Inex-Adria Aviopromet Flight 550?: The aircraft was a McDonnell Douglas DC-9-32, registered as YU-AJR. It belonged to Inex-Adria, a charter airline based in Slovenia, Yugoslavia.

The British Airways aircraft, a Hawker Siddeley Trident 3B, was a former British European Airways (BEA) aircraft.

Answer: True

The Hawker Siddeley Trident 3B operated by British Airways had previously belonged to British European Airways.

Related Concepts:

  • What was the aircraft type and registration number for British Airways Flight 476?: British Airways Flight 476 was a Hawker Siddeley Trident 3B, registered as G-AWZT. This aircraft was a former British European Airways plane and retained the 'Bealine' callsign.

Which two flights were involved in the 1976 Zagreb mid-air collision?

Answer: British Airways Flight 476 and Inex-Adria Flight 550

The two aircraft involved in the collision were British Airways Flight 476 and Inex-Adria Aviopromet Flight 550.

Related Concepts:

  • Which two aircraft were involved in the mid-air collision near Zagreb on September 10, 1976?: The two aircraft involved were British Airways Flight 476 and Inex-Adria Aviopromet Flight 550.

What was the intended destination of British Airways Flight 476?

Answer: Istanbul Ataturk Airport

British Airways Flight 476 was scheduled to fly from London Heathrow Airport to Istanbul Ataturk Airport.

Related Concepts:

  • What was the intended flight path for British Airways Flight 476?: British Airways Flight 476 was scheduled to fly from London Heathrow Airport to Istanbul Ataturk Airport.

What type of aircraft was Inex-Adria Aviopromet Flight 550?

Answer: McDonnell Douglas DC-9-32

Inex-Adria Aviopromet Flight 550 was a McDonnell Douglas DC-9-32 aircraft.

Related Concepts:

  • What was the aircraft model and registration number for Inex-Adria Aviopromet Flight 550?: The aircraft was a McDonnell Douglas DC-9-32, registered as YU-AJR. It belonged to Inex-Adria, a charter airline based in Slovenia, Yugoslavia.

How many people were on board Inex-Adria Flight 550?

Answer: 113

Inex-Adria Flight 550 carried a total of 113 individuals, including 108 passengers and a crew of 5.

Related Concepts:

  • What was the total number of individuals aboard Inex-Adria Aviopromet Flight 550?: Inex-Adria Aviopromet Flight 550 carried 113 individuals, comprising 108 passengers and a crew of 5.

What was the registration number of the British Airways Hawker Siddeley Trident?

Answer: G-AWZT

The registration number of the British Airways Hawker Siddeley Trident was G-AWZT.

Related Concepts:

  • What was the registration number of the British Airways Hawker Siddeley Trident aircraft?: The registration number of the British Airways Hawker Siddeley Trident was G-AWZT.

What was the intended origin of Inex-Adria Aviopromet Flight 550?

Answer: Split Airport

Inex-Adria Aviopromet Flight 550 originated from Split Airport in Yugoslavia.

Related Concepts:

  • From where did Inex-Adria Aviopromet Flight 550 originate?: Inex-Adria Aviopromet Flight 550 originated from Split Airport in SR Croatia, Yugoslavia.

What was the call sign for Inex-Adria Aviopromet Flight 550?

Answer: ADRIA 550

The designated call sign for Inex-Adria Aviopromet Flight 550 was ADRIA 550.

Related Concepts:

  • What was the designated call sign for Inex-Adria Aviopromet Flight 550?: The call sign for Inex-Adria Aviopromet Flight 550 was ADRIA 550.

How many people were on board British Airways Flight 476?

Answer: 63

British Airways Flight 476 carried a total of 63 individuals, comprising 54 passengers and a crew of 9.

Related Concepts:

  • How many individuals were on board British Airways Flight 476?: British Airways Flight 476 carried a total of 63 individuals, comprising 54 passengers and a crew of 9.

What was the registration number of the Inex-Adria McDonnell Douglas DC-9?

Answer: YU-AJR

The registration number of the Inex-Adria McDonnell Douglas DC-9 was YU-AJR.

Related Concepts:

  • What was the registration number of the Inex-Adria McDonnell Douglas DC-9 aircraft?: The registration number of the Inex-Adria McDonnell Douglas DC-9 was YU-AJR.

What was the intended origin of British Airways Flight 476?

Answer: London Heathrow Airport

British Airways Flight 476 originated from London Heathrow Airport in the United Kingdom.

Related Concepts:

  • From where did British Airways Flight 476 originate?: British Airways Flight 476 originated from London Heathrow Airport in the United Kingdom.

What was the standard call sign for British Airways flights, which BA476 did not use?

Answer: SPEEDBIRD

The standard call sign for British Airways is 'Speedbird.' BA476 used 'Bealine 476' due to its aircraft's previous registration.

Related Concepts:

  • What was the call sign used by British Airways Flight 476, and why was it considered unique?: The call sign for British Airways Flight 476 was BEALINE 476. This was because the aircraft, G-AWZT, was a former British European Airways aircraft and retained its previous callsign instead of the standard British Airways 'Speedbird' callsign.

Air Traffic Control and Procedural Failures

The primary cause of the 1976 Zagreb mid-air collision was attributed to a mechanical failure in the navigation systems of both aircraft.

Answer: False

The official findings indicated that procedural errors by air traffic controllers were the primary cause, rather than mechanical system failures.

Related Concepts:

  • What was identified as the primary cause of the 1976 Zagreb mid-air collision?: The collision was primarily attributed to procedural errors made by air traffic controllers in Zagreb.

The Zagreb air traffic control region in the mid-1970s was characterized by high traffic volume, understaffing, and inadequate equipment.

Answer: True

The region faced operational challenges due to high air traffic density, insufficient staffing levels, and outdated or inadequate equipment.

Related Concepts:

  • What were the prevailing operational conditions within the Zagreb air traffic control region during the mid-1970s?: The Zagreb air traffic control region was characterized by high air traffic volume, significant understaffing, and inadequate equipment.

Inex-Adria Flight 550 was cleared to climb to Flight Level 260.

Answer: False

Inex-Adria Flight 550 was cleared to climb to Flight Level 350, not Flight Level 260.

Related Concepts:

  • What altitude adjustment did Inex-Adria Flight 550 request?: Inex-Adria Flight 550 requested a higher flight level, as it was at FL260 and higher levels were unavailable. It was offered and accepted FL350.
  • To what flight level was Inex-Adria Flight 550 cleared to climb?: Inex-Adria Flight 550 was cleared to climb to Flight Level 350.

The last communication from British Airways Flight 476 confirmed they were squawking transponder code 2312.

Answer: True

The final transmission from BA476 confirmed adherence to the instruction to squawk transponder code 2312.

Related Concepts:

  • What was the final communication received from British Airways Flight 476 prior to the collision?: The last communication from BA476 was at 10:04:40 UTC, confirming they were squawking transponder code 2312 as instructed.

Controller Gradimir Tasić issued a critical instruction to Inex-Adria Flight 550 in Serbo-Croatian, rather than the required English.

Answer: True

Controller Gradimir Tasić issued a critical instruction to Inex-Adria Flight 550 in Serbo-Croatian, rather than the required English, violating regulations.

Related Concepts:

  • In what language did controller Tasić issue his final, critical instruction to JP550?: Tasić reverted to his native Serbo-Croatian language for the instruction, which was against regulations and likely not understood by the British Airways crew.

The middle-sector controller, Bojan Erjavec, was involved in clearing JP550 to a higher altitude, but coordination issues involved other controllers.

Answer: True

While Bojan Erjavec was involved in the clearance process for JP550, the overall coordination breakdown and the critical error in the upper sector were key factors.

Related Concepts:

  • What role did the middle-sector controller, Bojan Erjavec, play in the events leading up to the collision?: Erjavec was involved in clearing JP550 for a higher altitude and was the controller who received the agitated report from the Lufthansa captain about the collision.
  • What critical error occurred during the coordination of Inex-Adria Flight 550's climb?: There was a breakdown in communication and coordination between controllers regarding JP550's ascent, leading it to climb into the same altitude level as BA476.

The flight crew of BA476 did not report the collision to Zagreb control.

Answer: True

Neither flight crew reported the collision; the event was deduced from witness accounts and radar data.

Related Concepts:

  • What initial instructions did the Zagreb Upper sector controller issue to British Airways Flight 476?: The controller instructed BA476 to select transponder code 2312 and to report when passing the Zagreb VOR (VHF Omnidirectional Range).
  • What was the role of the Zagreb VOR navigational aid in the context of the accident?: The Zagreb VOR served as a crucial reporting point for air traffic control within a busy airway system, and both aircraft were expected to pass it around the time of the collision.

The collision occurred over the Zagreb VOR navigational aid.

Answer: True

The Zagreb VOR served as a crucial reporting point for air traffic control within a busy airway system, and both aircraft were expected to pass it around the time of the collision.

Related Concepts:

  • What was the role of the Zagreb VOR navigational aid in the context of the accident?: The Zagreb VOR served as a crucial reporting point for air traffic control within a busy airway system, and both aircraft were expected to pass it around the time of the collision.

The collision occurred because Inex-Adria Flight 550 was cleared to climb into the path of British Airways Flight 476.

Answer: True

The accident resulted from a procedural error that allowed Inex-Adria Flight 550 to climb into the same airspace occupied by British Airways Flight 476.

Related Concepts:

  • What altitude adjustment did Inex-Adria Flight 550 request?: Inex-Adria Flight 550 requested a higher flight level, as it was at FL260 and higher levels were unavailable. It was offered and accepted FL350.
  • What critical error occurred during the coordination of Inex-Adria Flight 550's climb?: There was a breakdown in communication and coordination between controllers regarding JP550's ascent, leading it to climb into the same altitude level as BA476.

What was identified as the primary cause of the mid-air collision?

Answer: A procedural error by air traffic controllers

The primary cause identified was a procedural error made by air traffic controllers in managing the separation of the two aircraft.

Related Concepts:

  • What was identified as the primary cause of the 1976 Zagreb mid-air collision?: The collision was primarily attributed to procedural errors made by air traffic controllers in Zagreb.

The Zagreb air traffic control region was noted for which operational issues in the mid-1970s?

Answer: High traffic volume, understaffing, and inadequate equipment

The Zagreb air traffic control region faced challenges including high air traffic volume, insufficient staffing, and inadequate equipment during the mid-1970s.

Related Concepts:

  • What were the prevailing operational conditions within the Zagreb air traffic control region during the mid-1970s?: The Zagreb air traffic control region was characterized by high air traffic volume, significant understaffing, and inadequate equipment.

What critical factor complicated the coordination for Inex-Adria Flight 550's climb?

Answer: The upper-sector controller was working alone and overwhelmed.

The coordination was significantly complicated because the upper-sector controller was working alone due to a late replacement and was overwhelmed with managing air traffic.

Related Concepts:

  • What factor significantly complicated the coordination for Inex-Adria Flight 550's climb?: The coordination was complicated because the upper-sector controller, Gradimir Tasić, was working alone due to his replacement being late and was overwhelmed with other air traffic.

What flight level did Inex-Adria Flight 550 request?

Answer: FL350

Inex-Adria Flight 550 requested to climb to Flight Level 350.

Related Concepts:

  • What altitude adjustment did Inex-Adria Flight 550 request?: Inex-Adria Flight 550 requested a higher flight level, as it was at FL260 and higher levels were unavailable. It was offered and accepted FL350.

What specific communication error did controller Gradimir Tasić commit?

Answer: He issued a critical instruction in Serbo-Croatian instead of English.

Controller Gradimir Tasić issued a critical instruction to Inex-Adria Flight 550 in Serbo-Croatian, rather than the required English, violating regulations.

Related Concepts:

  • In what language did controller Tasić issue his final, critical instruction to JP550?: Tasić reverted to his native Serbo-Croatian language for the instruction, which was against regulations and likely not understood by the British Airways crew.

Human Factors and Crew Experience

The captain of British Airways Flight 476, Dennis Tann, had logged over 10,000 flying hours.

Answer: True

Captain Dennis Tann of British Airways Flight 476 possessed extensive experience, having logged 10,781 flying hours.

Related Concepts:

  • Who captained British Airways Flight 476, and what was their flight experience?: Captain Dennis Tann of British Airways Flight 476 possessed extensive experience, having logged 10,781 flying hours.

The captain of Inex-Adria Flight 550, Jože Krumpak, had accumulated over 10,000 flying hours.

Answer: True

Captain Jože Krumpak of Inex-Adria Flight 550 had accumulated 10,157 flying hours.

Related Concepts:

  • Who captained Inex-Adria Aviopromet Flight 550, and what was their flight experience?: The captain of Inex-Adria Aviopromet Flight 550 was Jože Krumpak, aged 51, who had accumulated 10,157 flying hours.

What was the documented flight experience of Captain Jože Krumpak of Inex-Adria Flight 550?

Answer: 10,157 flying hours

Captain Jože Krumpak had accumulated 10,157 flying hours at the time of the accident.

Related Concepts:

  • Who captained Inex-Adria Aviopromet Flight 550, and what was their flight experience?: The captain of Inex-Adria Aviopromet Flight 550 was Jože Krumpak, aged 51, who had accumulated 10,157 flying hours.

Consequences and Historical Significance

Both aircraft involved in the 1976 Zagreb collision were completely destroyed, resulting in 176 fatalities.

Answer: True

The collision resulted in the complete destruction of both aircraft and the tragic loss of all 176 lives on board.

Related Concepts:

  • What was the total number of fatalities resulting from the 1976 Zagreb mid-air collision?: Tragically, all 176 individuals aboard both aircraft perished in the collision, resulting in zero survivors.
  • What is the current aviation accident record for this event in Croatia and Yugoslavia?: The 1976 Zagreb mid-air collision remains the deadliest aviation accident in the history of both Yugoslavia and Croatia.

The collision near Zagreb in 1976 was the deadliest mid-air collision recorded globally at the time.

Answer: True

At the time of the incident, the 1976 Zagreb mid-air collision was the deadliest mid-air collision recorded worldwide.

Related Concepts:

  • What was the historical significance of this collision at the time it occurred?: At the time of the incident, the 1976 Zagreb mid-air collision was the deadliest mid-air collision recorded worldwide.
  • What is the current aviation accident record for this event in Croatia and Yugoslavia?: The 1976 Zagreb mid-air collision remains the deadliest aviation accident in the history of both Yugoslavia and Croatia.

Controller Gradimir Tasić was the only air traffic controller convicted for his role in the collision.

Answer: True

Gradimir Tasić was the sole air traffic controller convicted in relation to the accident.

Related Concepts:

  • What was the legal outcome for the air traffic controllers following the investigation and trial?: Gradimir Tasić was the only controller convicted and sentenced to seven years imprisonment. However, he was released early after serving nearly two years and three months.

The collision caused the Inex-Adria DC-9 to disintegrate instantly upon impact.

Answer: False

The Inex-Adria DC-9 did not disintegrate instantly; it entered a steep nose-dive after losing a portion of its wing.

Related Concepts:

  • What happened to the McDonnell Douglas DC-9 subsequent to the collision?: The DC-9, having lost a significant portion of its left wing, entered a steep nose-dive and crashed near the village of Dvorište near Rakovec, 25 seconds after the collision.

Following the accident, Gradimir Tasić served his full seven-year sentence.

Answer: False

Gradimir Tasić served approximately two years and three months of his seven-year sentence before being released early.

Related Concepts:

  • What was the legal outcome for the air traffic controllers following the investigation and trial?: Gradimir Tasić was the only controller convicted and sentenced to seven years imprisonment. However, he was released early after serving nearly two years and three months.

The collision remains the deadliest aviation accident in the history of both Yugoslavia and Croatia.

Answer: True

The 1976 Zagreb mid-air collision holds the grim distinction of being the deadliest aviation accident in the historical records of both Yugoslavia and Croatia.

Related Concepts:

  • What is the current aviation accident record for this event in Croatia and Yugoslavia?: The 1976 Zagreb mid-air collision remains the deadliest aviation accident in the history of both Yugoslavia and Croatia.

A baby and a boy were found alive near the crash sites but later died.

Answer: True

Initial reports indicated that a baby and a boy were found alive near the crash sites but subsequently died.

Related Concepts:

  • Were there any reports of potential survivors discovered near the crash sites?: Yes, initial reports from a police officer and locals mentioned a baby and a boy found near the crash sites showing signs of life, but they later died.

The air traffic controller Gradimir Tasić was found to have been unfairly made a scapegoat for the accident.

Answer: True

A petition from other air traffic controllers suggested that Gradimir Tasić had been unfairly scapegoated for the accident.

Related Concepts:

  • Why was Gradimir Tasić ultimately considered to have been unfairly scapegoated?: Following a petition from other air traffic controllers, it was determined that Tasić had been unfairly made a scapegoat for the accident.

The captain of a Lufthansa flight reported seeing a flash, followed by smoke, and then two descending aircraft just before the collision.

Answer: True

The Lufthansa captain's account described seeing a flash and smoke, followed by the observation of two aircraft descending, indicating the collision had occurred.

Related Concepts:

  • How did the captain of a Lufthansa flight describe witnessing the collision?: The Lufthansa captain described seeing a flash, followed by a ball of smoke, and then two aircraft descending rapidly towards the ground.
  • What did the captain of the Lufthansa flight report observing immediately after the collision?: The Lufthansa captain reported seeing two aircraft descending rapidly with smoke, indicating a mid-air collision had occurred directly overhead.

The Lufthansa aircraft witnessing the event was flying at Flight Level 290.

Answer: True

The Lufthansa aircraft was flying at Flight Level 290, approximately 29,000 feet.

Related Concepts:

  • What was the approximate altitude of the Lufthansa Boeing 737 that witnessed the collision?: The Lufthansa aircraft was flying at Flight Level 290, which is approximately 29,000 feet (8,800 meters).

The 1976 Zagreb mid-air collision is the deadliest aviation accident in Croatian history.

Answer: True

The 1976 Zagreb mid-air collision remains the deadliest aviation accident in the history of Croatia.

Related Concepts:

  • What is the current aviation accident record for this event in Croatia and Yugoslavia?: The 1976 Zagreb mid-air collision remains the deadliest aviation accident in the history of both Yugoslavia and Croatia.

How did the captain of a Lufthansa flight describe the visual evidence of the collision?

Answer: He witnessed a flash, then smoke, and two descending aircraft.

The Lufthansa captain reported seeing a flash, followed by smoke, and then two aircraft descending rapidly towards the ground.

Related Concepts:

  • How did the captain of a Lufthansa flight describe witnessing the collision?: The Lufthansa captain described seeing a flash, followed by a ball of smoke, and then two aircraft descending rapidly towards the ground.
  • What did the captain of the Lufthansa flight report observing immediately after the collision?: The Lufthansa captain reported seeing two aircraft descending rapidly with smoke, indicating a mid-air collision had occurred directly overhead.

Why was Gradimir Tasić considered a scapegoat?

Answer: Other controllers petitioned, stating he was unfairly blamed.

A petition from other air traffic controllers suggested that Gradimir Tasić had been unfairly scapegoated for the accident.

Related Concepts:

  • Why was Gradimir Tasić ultimately considered to have been unfairly scapegoated?: Following a petition from other air traffic controllers, it was determined that Tasić had been unfairly made a scapegoat for the accident.

What happened to the Hawker Siddeley Trident after the collision?

Answer: Its forward section disintegrated, causing it to fall near Gaj.

The collision caused explosive decompression that disintegrated the forward section of the Trident's fuselage, leading to its crash near Gaj.

Related Concepts:

  • What was the immediate physical impact of the collision on the Hawker Siddeley Trident?: The collision caused an explosive decompression that disintegrated the forward section of the Trident's fuselage, killing the pilots instantly. The aircraft then fell near the village of Gaj.

What was the approximate altitude of the Lufthansa Boeing 737 that witnessed the collision?

Answer: Flight Level 290

The Lufthansa aircraft was flying at Flight Level 290, approximately 29,000 feet.

Related Concepts:

  • What was the approximate altitude of the Lufthansa Boeing 737 that witnessed the collision?: The Lufthansa aircraft was flying at Flight Level 290, which is approximately 29,000 feet (8,800 meters).

Investigations and Media Documentation

The book 'Zagreb One Four: Cleared to Collide?' was written by Richard Weston and Ronald Hurst.

Answer: True

The book detailing the collision is titled 'Zagreb One Four: Cleared to Collide?' and was authored by Richard Weston and Ronald Hurst.

Related Concepts:

  • What is the title of the book that provides a detailed account of this collision?: A book detailing the collision is titled 'Zagreb One Four: Cleared to Collide?' by Richard Weston and Ronald Hurst.

Which of the following aviation incidents was NOT listed in the 'See also' section of the source material?

Answer: 1985 Japan Airlines Flight 123 crash

The 1985 Japan Airlines Flight 123 crash was not listed among the related aviation incidents in the 'See also' section.

Related Concepts:

  • What other mid-air collisions are mentioned in the 'See also' section of the source material?: The 'See also' section lists the 1973 Nantes mid-air collision, the 2001 Japan Airlines mid-air incident (a near miss), and the 2002 Überlingen mid-air collision.

Home | Sitemaps | Contact | Terms | Privacy